66 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Extended State Dependent Parameter modelling with a Data-Based Mechanistic approach to nonlinear model structure identification D. Mindham et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.015
2. Derivation of new analytical solution for pollution transport through large porous media J. Chabokpour et al. 10.1007/s13762-020-02766-1
3. A staggered approach to flash flood forecasting – case study in the Cévennes region L. Alfieri et al. 10.5194/adgeo-29-13-2011
4. Contribution of meteorological input in calibrating a distributed hydrologic model in a watershed in the Tianshan Mountains, China G. Fang et al. 10.1007/s12665-015-4244-7
5. Morris method of sensitivity analysis applied to assess the importance of input variables on urban water supply yield – A case study D. King & B. Perera 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.017
6. Evaluation of a Stepwise, Multiobjective, Multivariable Parameter Optimization Method for the APEX Model G. Senaviratne et al. 10.2134/jeq2013.12.0509
7. Multi-Objective Sensitivity Analysis of a Fully Distributed Hydrologic Model WetSpa J. Yang et al. 10.1007/s11269-011-9908-9
8. Quantifying the natural flood management potential of leaky dams in upland catchments, Part I: A data-based modelling approach Z. van Leeuwen et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130448
9. An assessment of DBM flood forecasting models M. Vaughan & N. McIntyre 10.1680/wama.2012.165.2.105
10. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: Mathematical model of coupled heat and mass transfer for a contact baking process A. Feyissa et al. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.09.012
11. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of mesoscale model downscaled hydro-meteorological variables for discharge prediction P. Srivastava et al. 10.1002/hyp.9946
12. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Hydrological Provision Ecosystem Services for Watershed Conservation Planning of Water Resources M. Fan & H. Shibata 10.1007/s11269-014-0691-2
13. Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis J. Yang 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.007
14. Errors in temporal disaggregation of temperature can lead to non-negligible biases in agroecosystem risk assessment S. Savalkar et al. 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109952
15. Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Design and improvement J. Antle et al. 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.10.002
16. A two-stage sensitivity analysis for parameter identification and calibration of a physically-based distributed model in a river basin S. Sreedevi & T. Eldho 10.1080/02626667.2019.1602730
17. Statistical Emulation of Large Linear Dynamic Models P. Young & M. Ratto 10.1198/TECH.2010.07151
18. On the choice of calibration periods and objective functions: A practical guide to model parameter identification R. Romanowicz et al. 10.2478/s11600-013-0157-6
19. Applying a Global Sensitivity Analysis Workflow to Improve the Computational Efficiencies in Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling N. Hsieh et al. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00588
20. Parameter uncertainty and identifiability of a conceptual semi-distributed model to simulate hydrological processes in a small headwater catchment in Northwest China S. Ouyang et al. 10.1186/s13717-014-0014-9
21. VISCOUS: A Variance‐Based Sensitivity Analysis Using Copulas for Efficient Identification of Dominant Hydrological Processes R. Sheikholeslami et al. 10.1029/2020WR028435
22. Assessment of a green roof practice using the coupled SWMM and HYDRUS models S. Baek et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109920
23. Simulating Water Resource Availability under Data Scarcity—A Case Study for the Ferghana Valley (Central Asia) I. Radchenko et al. 10.3390/w6113270
24. Global sensitivity analysis for choosing the main soil parameters of a crop model to be determined H. Varella et al. 10.4236/as.2012.37116
25. Stochastic modeling of expansion of starchy melts during extrusion P. Manepalli et al. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.10.005
26. Analysing the Sub-processes of a Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Using Information About the Parameter Sensitivity and Variance C. Massmann & H. Holzmann 10.1007/s10666-014-9414-6
27. Global Sensitivity Analysis of Groundwater Related Dike Stability under Extreme Loading Conditions T. van Woerkom et al. 10.3390/w13213041
28. Sensitivity and Uncertainty of Ground‐Water Discharge Estimates for Semiarid Shrublands1 J. Zhu & M. Young 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00312.x
29. Ensemble Evaluation of Hydrologically Enhanced Noah-LSM: Partitioning of the Water Balance in High-Resolution Simulations over the Little Washita River Experimental Watershed E. Rosero et al. 10.1175/2010JHM1228.1
30. Regional Snow Parameters Estimation for Large‐Domain Hydrological Applications in the Western United States N. Sun et al. 10.1029/2018JD030140
31. Identification of rural land management signals in runoff response N. McIntyre & M. Marshall 10.1002/hyp.7774
32. Modeling streamflow in headwater catchments: A data-based mechanistic grounded framework N. Fernandez et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101243
33. Reliability Assessment of Machine Learning Models in Hydrological Predictions Through Metamorphic Testing Y. Yang & T. Chui 10.1029/2020WR029471
34. AN AUTOMATED METHOD FOR EXTENDING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TO MODEL FUNCTIONS J. HEARNE 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2009.00058.x
35. Characterization of process-oriented hydrologic model behavior with temporal sensitivity analysis for flash floods in Mediterranean catchments P. Garambois et al. 10.5194/hess-17-2305-2013
36. Relative Importance of Input Parameters in the Modeling of Soil Moisture Dynamics of Small Urban Areas S. Nishat et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000461
37. A sensitivity analysis of tide-induced head fluctuations in coastal aquifers L. Slooten et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.032
38. Analysis of the behavior of a rainfall–runoff model using three global sensitivity analysis methods evaluated at different temporal scales C. Massmann & H. Holzmann 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.026
39. Uncertainty analysis of a semi-distributed hydrologic model based on a Gaussian Process emulator J. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.037
40. Quantitative Characterization of Population-Wide Tissue- and Metabolite-Specific Variability in Perchloroethylene Toxicokinetics in Male Mice C. Dalaijamts et al. 10.1093/toxsci/kfab057
41. Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models M. Ratto et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.003
42. Sensitivity Analysis for Hydraulic Models J. Hall et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000098
43. Scaling and predicting solute transport processes in streams R. González‐Pinzón et al. 10.1002/wrcr.20280
44. Biogas maximization using data-driven modelling with uncertainty analysis and genetic algorithm for municipal wastewater anaerobic digestion M. Asadi & K. McPhedran 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112875
45. Modified Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) Methodology for Considering the Subjectivity of Likelihood Measure Selection Y. Zhang et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000341
46. Hypothetico‐inductive data‐based mechanistic modeling of hydrological systems P. Young 10.1002/wrcr.20068
47. Natural vs. artificial groundwater recharge, quantification through inverse modeling H. Hashemi et al. 10.5194/hess-17-637-2013
48. An effective strategy for combining variance- and distribution-based global sensitivity analysis G. Baroni & T. Francke 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104851
49. Using the Morris sensitivity analysis method to assess the importance of input variables on time-reversal imaging of seismic sources A. Franczyk 10.1007/s11600-019-00356-5
50. Screening and Optimizing the Sensitive Parameters of BTOPMC Model Based on UQ-PyL Software: Case Study of a Flood Event in the Fuji River Basin, Japan L. Liu et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001970
51. Testing probabilistic adaptive real‐time flood forecasting models P. Smith et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12055
52. Making the most out of a hydrological model data set: Sensitivity analyses to open the model black‐box E. Borgonovo et al. 10.1002/2017WR020767
53. Investigating the role of ENSO in groundwater temporal variability across Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates using machine learning algorithms K. Alghafli et al. 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101389
54. Sensitivity analysis of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang rainfall-runoff fuzzy models A. Jacquin & A. Shamseldin 10.5194/hess-13-41-2009
55. Parameter sensitivity analysis and optimization of Noah land surface model with field measurements from Huaihe River Basin, China T. Hou et al. 10.1007/s00477-015-1033-5
56. Comprehensive evaluation of parameter importance and optimization based on the integrated sensitivity analysis system: A case study of the BTOP model in the upper Min River Basin, China L. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127819
57. Sensitivity analysis of permeable pavement hydrological modelling in the Storm Water Management Model E. Madrazo-Uribeetxebarria et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126525
58. Forests, water and food security in the northwestern highlands of Ethiopia: Knowledge synthesis S. Gebrehiwot 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.002
59. Resolving challenges of groundwater flow modelling for improved water resources management: a narrative review S. Wali et al. 10.15406/ijh.2024.08.00390
60. Structural uncertainty assessment in a discharge simulation model X. Zhang et al. 10.1080/02626667.2011.587426
61. Effects of flood wave shape on probabilistic slope stability of dikes under transient groundwater conditions T. van Woerkom et al. 10.1080/17499518.2023.2222540
62. Global sensitivity analysis measures the quality of parameter estimation: The case of soil parameters and a crop model H. Varella et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.012
63. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review M. Hrachowitz et al. 10.1080/02626667.2013.803183
64. Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models F. Pappenberger et al. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009
65. Quantifying parameter sensitivity, interaction, and transferability in hydrologically enhanced versions of the Noah land surface model over transition zones during the warm season E. Rosero et al. 10.1029/2009JD012035
66. Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation Y. Tang et al. 10.5194/hess-11-793-2007