171 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A similarity framework to assess controls on shallow subsurface flow dynamics in hillslopes C. Harman & M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007067
2. Perceptual models of uncertainty for socio-hydrological systems: a flood risk change example I. Westerberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1356926
3. Rainfall seasonality and an ecohydrological feedback offset the potential impact of climate warming on evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge L. Pangle et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2012WR013253
4. Cattle vs. Ground Beef: What's the Difference? H. Lin https://doi.org/10.2136/sh2007.1.0009
5. The secret to ‘doing better hydrological science’: change the question! M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7242
6. Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments L. Pfister et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11134
7. Hortonian runoff closure relations for geomorphologic response units: evaluation against field data E. Vannametee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2981-2013
8. Groundwater hysteresis increasingly decouples flowing network length from streamflow as snow shifts to rain E. Boardman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5145-2026
9. Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? M. Weiler & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016731
10. Robust evidence for random fractal scaling of groundwater levels in unconfined aquifers M. Little & J. Bloomfield https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.031
11. Design and experimentation of an empirical multistructure framework for accurate, sharp and reliable hydrological ensembles G. Seiller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.002
12. Distributed hydrological modeling of floods in the Cévennes-Vivarais region, France: Impact of uncertainties related to precipitation estimation and model parameterization R. Navas & G. Delrieu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.032
13. A Scalable Earth Observations‐Based Decision Support System for Hydropower Planning in Africa A. Koppa et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12914
14. Climate change and fluvial flood risk in the UK: more of the same? R. Wilby et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6847
15. Age‐Ranked Storage‐Discharge Relations: A Unified Description of Spatially Lumped Flow and Water Age in Hydrologic Systems C. Harman https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022304
16. Ensembles vs. information theory: supporting science under uncertainty G. Nearing & H. Gupta https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-018-0709-9
17. The Numerical Formulation of Simple Hysteretic Models to Simulate the Large‐Scale Hydrological Impacts of Prairie Depressions M. Clark & K. Shook https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032694
18. Hydrological model calibration using a short period of observations T. Tada & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8302
19. A holistic perspective on soil architecture is needed as a key to soil functions H. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13152
20. Analysis of subsurface storage and streamflow generation in urban watersheds A. Bhaskar & C. Welty https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015607
21. A thermodynamic interpretation of Budyko and L'vovich formulations of annual water balance: Proportionality Hypothesis and maximum entropy production D. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016857
22. Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005563
23. Threshold behaviour in hydrological systems as (human) geo-ecosystems: manifestations, controls, implications E. Zehe & M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1273-2009
24. Improving the Predictive Skill of a Distributed Hydrological Model by Calibration on Spatial Patterns With Multiple Satellite Data Sets M. Dembélé et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026085
25. Characteristics of soil water retention curve at macro-scale F. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-009-0272-4
26. Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph J. McDonnell & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015141
27. HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments E. Zehe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014
28. Ecohydrological particle model based on representative domains C. Jackisch & E. Zehe https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3639-2018
29. Preferential flows and travel time distributions: defining adequate hypothesis tests for hydrological process models K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7718
30. Evaluation of storage–discharge relationships and recession analysis-based distributed hourly runoff simulation in large-scale, mountainous and snow-influenced catchment T. Hailegeorgis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1170939
31. Water storage dynamics in a till hillslope: the foundation for modeling flows and turnover times N. Amvrosiadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11046
32. Water balance components of the potential agricultural grabens along the Rift Valley in northern Ethiopia H. Meaza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100616
33. Deep learning, hydrological processes and the uniqueness of place K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13805
34. Reviews and Syntheses: Promoting the Advancement of Hillslope Hydrology and Stability in Taiwan from the Perspective of Critical Zone Science Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061234
35. Estimation of Total Drainable Water Storage Using GRACE in the Brahmaputra River Basin, India P. Parmita & R. Bhattacharjya https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6136
36. Seasonal connections between meteoric water and streamflow generation along a mountain headwater stream S. Leuthold et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14029
37. Fill‐and‐Spill: A Process Description of Runoff Generation at the Scale of the Beholder J. McDonnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027514
38. Inter-annual variability of catchment water balance in a montane spruce forest V. Skalova et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2093643
39. Hydrological partitioning in the critical zone: Recent advances and opportunities for developing transferable understanding of water cycle dynamics P. Brooks et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017039
40. Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity T. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x
41. On red herrings and real herrings: disinformation and information in hydrological inference K. Beven & I. Westerberg https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7963
42. Time‐Variability of Flow Recession Dynamics: Application of Machine Learning and Learning From the Machine M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032690
43. Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005
44. Tiny Machine Learning Approach for Grid-Based Monitoring of UAV Tracking and Cyber-Physical Systems in Hydraulic Surveying A. Kiran et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2024.3495332
45. HyGage: Solving the hysteresis puzzle with a new streamflow monitoring method M. Muste et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2026.105513
46. Benchmarking data-driven rainfall–runoff models in Great Britain: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models with four lumped conceptual models T. Lees et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5517-2021
47. Catchment Hysteresis From Pathway Branching and Storage Trapping: A Two‐Parameter Mittag‐Leffler Closure and Its Application to the Great Catchment Hysteresis Challenge F. Chishtie https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70728
48. Earth's Critical Zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances H. Lin https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-25-2010
49. Flow pathways in the Slapton Wood catchment using temperature as a tracer S. Birkinshaw & B. Webb https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.042
50. On inclusion of water resource management in Earth system models – Part 2: Representation of water supply and allocation and opportunities for improved modeling A. Nazemi & H. Wheater https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-63-2015
51. The Great Catchment Hysteresis Challenge K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70438
52. Reservoirs are hotspots of nitrogen cycling in peatland catchments D. Edokpa et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10892
53. Transport in the hydrologic response: Travel time distributions, soil moisture dynamics, and the old water paradox G. Botter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008371
54. Identifying dominant runoff mechanisms and their lumped modeling: a data-based modeling approach Y. Yokoo et al. https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.11.128
55. Effects of hydraulic conductivity variability on hillslope‐scale shallow subsurface flow response and storage‐discharge relations C. Harman & M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007228
56. Extension of the Representative Elementary Watershed approach for cold regions: constitutive relationships and an application L. Mou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-565-2008
57. Improving calibration of groundwater flow models using headwater streamflow intermittence R. Abhervé et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15167
58. Emergence of macroscopic hydraulic behaviors from data: a hybrid physics-AI universal differential equation framework for spatio-temporal soil moisture dynamics W. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136417
59. HESS Opinions: Advocating process modeling and de-emphasizing parameter estimation A. Bahremand https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1433-2016
60. Hysteresis of soil moisture spatial heterogeneity and the “homogenizing” effect of vegetation V. Ivanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008611
61. Transit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1155
62. The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment D. Penna et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-689-2011
63. Field-scale water balance closure in seasonally frozen conditions X. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5401-2017
64. Modeling hydrologic responses of the Zwalm catchment using the REW approach: propagation of uncertainty in soil properties to model output A. El Ouazzani Taibi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0268-1
65. Building a High-Precision 2D Hydrodynamic Flood Model Using UAV Photogrammetry and Sensor Network Monitoring J. Langhammer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110861
66. How much water can a watershed store? T. Sayama et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8288
67. Storage under the 2011 Chao Phraya River flood: An interpretation of watershed-scale storage changes at two neighboring mountainous watersheds in northern Thailand Y. Yokoo et al. https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.8.1
68. Hydropedology: Towards new insights into interactive pedologic and hydrologic processes across scales H. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.054
69. Velocities, celerities and the basin of attraction in catchment response K. Beven & J. Davies https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10699
70. From engineering hydrology to Earth system science: milestones in the transformation of hydrologic science M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1665-2018
71. Averaging over spatiotemporal heterogeneity substantially biases evapotranspiration rates in a mechanistic large-scale land evaporation model E. Rouholahnejad Freund et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5015-2020
72. Quantifying storage changes in regional Great Lakes watersheds using a coupled subsurface‐land surface process model and GRACE, MODIS products J. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015589
73. Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene S. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5013-2013
74. HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology M. Hrachowitz & M. Clark https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017
75. From spatially variable streamflow to distributed hydrological models: Analysis of key modeling decisions F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017398
76. A coupled hydrology–biogeochemistry model to simulate dissolved organic carbon exports from a permafrost‐influenced catchment J. Lessels et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10566
77. An experiment to gauge an ungauged catchment: rapid data assessment and eco-hydrological modelling in a data-scarce rural catchment C. Jackisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.870662
78. Calibration of a distributed hydrology and land surface model using energy flux measurements M. Larsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.11.012
79. Scaling Point‐Scale (Pedo)transfer Functions to Seamless Large‐Domain Parameter Estimates for High‐Resolution Distributed Hydrologic Modeling: An Example for the Rhine River R. Imhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026807
80. CoastFLOOD: A High-Resolution Model for the Simulation of Coastal Inundation Due to Storm Surges C. Makris et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10050103
81. Barriers to progress in distributed hydrological modelling O. Semenova & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10434
82. No monsters, no miracles: in nonlinear sciences hydrology is not an outlier! D. Schertzer et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.505173
83. Energy states of soil water – a thermodynamic perspective on soil water dynamics and storage-controlled streamflow generation in different landscapes E. Zehe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-971-2019
84. Multi‐Constrained Catchment Scale Optimization of Groundwater Abstraction Using Linear Programming M. Danapour et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13083
85. Effect of bedrock permeability on stream base flow mean transit time scaling relations: 1. A multiscale catchment intercomparison V. Hale & J. McDonnell https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016124
86. Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes H. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.013
87. Dealing with Landscape Heterogeneity in Watershed Hydrology: A Review of Recent Progress toward New Hydrological Theory P. Troch et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00186.x
88. Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterization, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward J. Kirchner https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006912
89. How old is streamwater? Open questions in catchment transit time conceptualization, modelling and analysis J. McDonnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7796
90. Three Principles of Soil Change and Pedogenesis in Time and Space H. Lin https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0130
91. Knots in the Strings: Do Small‐Scale River Features Shape Catchment‐Scale Fluxes? E. Wohl et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70036
92. An evaluation of the hysteresis in chemical concentration–discharge (C–Q) relationships from drained, intensively managed grasslands in southwest England A. Eludoyin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1313979
93. The Demographics of Water: A Review of Water Ages in the Critical Zone M. Sprenger et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000633
94. What makes Darwinian hydrology "Darwinian"? Asking a different kind of question about landscapes C. Harman & P. Troch https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-417-2014
95. Observation of hydrological processes and structures in the artificial Chicken Creek catchment K. Mazur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.10.001
96. Using uncertainty analysis and groundwater measurements to improve the confidence of river water balance estimates R. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.009
97. Topology of sustainable management of dynamical systems with desirable states: from defining planetary boundaries to safe operating spaces in the Earth system J. Heitzig et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-21-2016
98. HESS Opinions: The need for process-based evaluation of large-domain hyper-resolution models L. Melsen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1069-2016
99. Integrating field observations and process-based modeling to predict watershed water quality under environmental perturbations X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125762
100. Flood Simulations Using a Sensor Network and Support Vector Machine Model J. Langhammer https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112004
101. On doing better hydrological science K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7108
102. An equivalent cross-sectional basis for semidistributed hydrological modeling U. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014741
103. Quantifying groundwater storage dynamics in the Chesapeake Bay watershed (USA) using a large-scale integrated hydrologic model with detailed three-dimensional subsurface representation A. Seck & C. Welty https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-022-02563-9
104. Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models P. Groffman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5
105. Modelling subsurface storm flow with the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach: application to the Alzette River Basin G. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-937-2006
106. Scaling, similarity, and the fourth paradigm for hydrology C. Peters-Lidard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3701-2017
107. Hydropedological insights when considering catchment classification J. Bouma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1909-2011
108. Hysteresis and scale in catchment storage, flow and transport J. Davies & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10511
109. Picturing and modeling catchments by representative hillslopes R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1225-2017
110. Estimating the deep seepage component of the hillslope and catchment water balance within a measurement uncertainty framework C. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7788
111. Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analyses T. PAGE et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02756.x
112. Evaluating the effect of partial contributing storage on the storage–discharge function from recession analysis X. Chen & D. Wang https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4283-2013
113. Conceptualizing catchment processes: simply too complex? D. Tetzlaff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7069
114. A discrete particle representation of hillslope hydrology: hypothesis testing in reproducing a tracer experiment at Gårdsjön, Sweden J. Davies et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8085
115. Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: Pursuing certainty versus pursuing uberty V. Baker https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020078
116. A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017198
117. Reduction of evaporation from bare soil using plastic and gravel mulches and assessment of gravel mulch for partitioning evapotranspiration under irrigated canola P. Dlamini et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16098
118. Developing observational methods to drive future hydrological science: Can we make a start as a community? K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13622
119. lumpR 2.0.0: an R package facilitating landscape discretisation for hillslope-based hydrological models T. Pilz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3001-2017
120. A field and modeling study of nonlinear storage-discharge dynamics for an Alpine headwater catchment M. Camporese et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013604
121. The Skill of ECMWF Precipitation and Temperature Predictions in the Danube Basin as Forcings of Hydrological Models F. Pappenberger & R. Buizza https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2222120.1
122. Why can't we do better than Topmodel? W. Buytaert et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7125
123. Infiltration-Friendly Agroforestry Land Uses on Volcanic Slopes in the Rejoso Watershed, East Java, Indonesia D. Suprayogo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080240
124. Watersheds and stream networks viewed longitudinally: Example insights from novel spatial portrayals of watershed characteristics S. Raulerson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4107
125. On the value of a history of hydrology and the establishment of a History of Hydrology Working Group K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2452357
126. Towards closure relations in the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) framework containing observable parameters: Relations for Hortonian overland flow E. Vannametee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.029
127. A review and synthesis of hysteresis in hydrology and hydrological modeling: Memory, path-dependency, or missing physics? S. Gharari & S. Razavi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.037
128. Responses of annual runoff, evaporation, and storage change to climate variability at the watershed scale D. Wang & N. Alimohammadi https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011444
129. A reference data set of hillslope rainfall‐runoff response, Panola Mountain Research Watershed, United States H. Tromp‐van Meerveld et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006299
130. Using GRACE in a streamflow recession to determine drainable water storage in the Mississippi River basin H. Ehalt Macedo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3269-2019
131. Learning from satellite observations: increased understanding of catchment processes through stepwise model improvement P. Hulsman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-957-2021
132. The temporally varying roles of rainfall, snowmelt and soil moisture for debris flow initiation in a snow-dominated system K. Mostbauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3493-2018
133. Predicting event response in a nested catchment with generalized linear models and a distributed watershed model T. Graeff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8463
134. A comparison of watershed storage trends over the eastern and upper Midwestern regions of the United States, 2003–2015 B. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018617
135. Simulating streamflow and dissolved organic matter export from a forested watershed N. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011423
136. Are all runoff processes the same? J. McDonnell https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10076
137. Unravelling the impact of spatial discretization and calibration strategies on event-based flood models V. Manikanta & N. Umamahesh https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01936-7
138. Catchment travel time distributions and water flow in soils A. Rinaldo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010478
139. Understanding the rapidity of subsurface storm flow response from a fracture-oriented shallow vadose through a new perspective P. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.007
140. A subordinated kinematic wave equation for heavy‐tailed flow responses from heterogeneous hillslopes C. Harman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JF001273
141. Development of a system for automated setup of a physically-based, spatially-distributed hydrological model for catchments in Great Britain E. Lewis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.006
142. Groundwater dynamics mediate low‐flow response to global warming in snow‐dominated alpine regions C. Tague & G. Grant https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007179
143. A history of TOPMODEL K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-527-2021
144. Improving the Applicability of Hydrologic Models for Food–Energy–Water Nexus Studies Using Remote Sensing Data A. Koppa & M. Gebremichael https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040599
145. Hydrohill: A landmark public work created by Wei‐Zu Gu that advances experimental hydrology A. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15259
146. Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009827
147. Megascale thermodynamics in the presence of a conservative field: The watershed case P. Reggiani & S. Majid Hassanizadeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.09.002
148. Integrated modeling of metals biogeochemistry: Potential and limits V. Iordache et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2008.12.001
149. Prospects for the open treatment of uncertainty in environmental research J. Brown https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309357000
150. Estimating unconsolidated sediment cover thickness by using the horizontal distance to a bedrock outcrop as secondary information N. Kitterød https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4195-2017
151. Sensitivity of Catchment Transit Times to Rainfall Variability Under Present and Future Climates D. Wilusz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020894
152. Thinking inside the box: Investigating peak storm response in a simplified outdoor slope setup F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130064
153. Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process‐based hydrologic models M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910
154. Stable water isotopes and tritium tracers tell the same tale: no evidence for underestimation of catchment transit times inferred by stable isotopes in StorAge Selection (SAS)-function models S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3083-2023
155. Macropores and water flow in soils revisited K. Beven & P. Germann https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20156
156. Tall tales from the hydrological crypt: are models monsters? T. Mathevet & R. Garçon https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.503934
157. Comment on “Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water” by Eric F. Wood et al. K. Beven & H. Cloke https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010982
158. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183
159. The effects of topography and forest management on water storage in catchments in south‐central Chile G. Barrientos & A. Iroumé https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13261
160. An Analysis Platform for Multiscale Hydrogeologic Modeling with Emphasis on Hybrid Multiscale Methods T. Scheibe et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12179
161. Budyko‐Based Long‐Term Water and Energy Balance Closure in Global Watersheds From Earth Observations A. Koppa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028658
162. The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017
163. Preface: Linking landscape organisation and hydrological functioning: from hypotheses and observations to concepts, models and understanding C. Jackisch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021
164. A First Look at River Discharge Estimation From SWOT Satellite Observations K. Andreadis et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL114185
165. What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning? G. Nearing et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028091
166. Stochastic simulation experiment to assess radar rainfall retrieval uncertainties associated with attenuation and its correction R. Uijlenhoet & A. Berne https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-587-2008
167. How to make advances in hydrological modelling K. Beven https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.134
168. Are we unnecessarily constraining the agility of complex process-based models? P. Mendoza et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015820
169. Are all runoff processes the same? Numerical experiments comparing a Darcy‐Richards solver to an overland flow‐based approach for subsurface storm runoff simulation A. Ameli et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017199
170. Perceptual perplexity and parameter parsimony K. Beven & N. Chappell https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1530
171. Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the hydrology of the land surface K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-5003-4