Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-5-2169-2008
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-5-2169-2008
06 Aug 2008
 | 06 Aug 2008
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Cost-effective raingauge deployment and rainfall heterogeneity effect on hydrograph simulation in mountainous watersheds

Jr-Chuan Huang, Shuh-Ji Kao, Kang-Tsung Chang, Chuan-Yao Lin, and Pao-Liang Chang

Abstract. To what extent hydrograph simulation was influenced by the representativeness of rainfall input were examined in meso-scale subtropical mountainous watersheds, accordingly, cost-effective raingauge deployment was suggested. Two nested watersheds in northern Taiwan and two extreme typhoons with torrential rains were undertaken as case studies. The input of radar rainfall estimates with high spatial resolution of 1.3 km2 served as a reference, which was applied onto hydrograph simulation in TOPMODEL. After calibration, optimal parameters were obtained and fixed to examine effect of deviated rainfall on hydrograph. To mimic possible raingauge networks we designed four raingauge number classes: very low (3 points/total pixels), low (10 points/total), medium (20 points/total), and high (50 points/total) based on radar rainfall for the two watersheds in different size, thus, creating wide spectrum of raingauge density. All the corresponding hydrographs were compared with the reference hydrograph to probe errors in event discharge induced by calculated rainfall input.

Results showed that with the decreasing of raingauge density the biases (indicated by RMSE) of rainfall field estimates increase and the potential variability in rainfall field due to random sampling in raingauge location is exaggerated. By contrast, biases in model hydrographs are significantly smaller than that in rainfall field. When the raingauge governing area is <10 km2/gauge, the biased rainfall field shows no detectable effect on hydrographs. Incomparably lower RMSE in hydrograph indicates that surplus and deficit rainfalls at different locations were compensated in model simulation. In term of reliable hydrograph simulation, obviously, the criterion for raingauge density is not as high as that for rainfall estimate. When gauge governing is <20 km2/gauge, both the rainfall and discharge were successfully (±10% error) estimated in term of total volume. Accordingly, we suggested that covering area ~20 km2/gauge is acceptable for raingauge deployment to constrain the inherent variability in rainfall field and hydrograph simulation in mountainous watersheds.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Jr-Chuan Huang, Shuh-Ji Kao, Kang-Tsung Chang, Chuan-Yao Lin, and Pao-Liang Chang
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Jr-Chuan Huang, Shuh-Ji Kao, Kang-Tsung Chang, Chuan-Yao Lin, and Pao-Liang Chang
Jr-Chuan Huang, Shuh-Ji Kao, Kang-Tsung Chang, Chuan-Yao Lin, and Pao-Liang Chang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,498 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
776 647 75 1,498 107 91
  • HTML: 776
  • PDF: 647
  • XML: 75
  • Total: 1,498
  • BibTeX: 107
  • EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024