Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-3-27-2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-3-27-2006
03 Jan 2006
 | 03 Jan 2006
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

A decision analysis approach for optimal groundwater monitoring system design under uncertainty

N. B. Yenigül, A. M. M. Elfeki, C. van den Akker, and F. M. Dekking

Abstract. Groundwater contamination is the degradation of the natural quality of groundwater as a result of human activity. Landfills are one of the most common human activities threatening the groundwater quality. The objective of the monitoring systems is to detect the contaminant plumes before reaching the regulatory compliance boundary in order to prevent the severe risk to both society and groundwater quality, and also to enable cost-effective counter measures in case of a failure. The detection monitoring problem typically has a multi-objective nature. A multi-objective decision model (called MONIDAM) which links a classic decision analysis approach with a stochastic simulation model is applied to determine the optimal groundwater monitoring system given uncertainties due to the hydrogeological conditions and contaminant source characteristics. A Monte Carlo approach is used to incorporate uncertainties. Hydraulic conductivity and the leak location are the random inputs of the simulation model. The design objectives considered in the model are: (1) maximizing the detection probability, (2) minimizing the contaminated area and, (3) minimize the total cost of the monitoring system. The results show that the monitoring systems located close to the source are optimal except for the cases with very high unit installation and sampling cost and/or very cheap unit remediation cost.

N. B. Yenigül, A. M. M. Elfeki, C. van den Akker, and F. M. Dekking
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
N. B. Yenigül, A. M. M. Elfeki, C. van den Akker, and F. M. Dekking
N. B. Yenigül, A. M. M. Elfeki, C. van den Akker, and F. M. Dekking

Viewed

Total article views: 1,469 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
974 425 70 1,469 78 84
  • HTML: 974
  • PDF: 425
  • XML: 70
  • Total: 1,469
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 27 Apr 2024