Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
A decision analysis approach for optimal groundwater monitoring system design under uncertainty
N. B. Yenigül,A. M. M. Elfeki,C. van den Akker,and F. M. Dekking
Abstract. Groundwater contamination is the degradation of the natural quality of groundwater as a result of human activity. Landfills are one of the most common human activities threatening the groundwater quality. The objective of the monitoring systems is to detect the contaminant plumes before reaching the regulatory compliance boundary in order to prevent the severe risk to both society and groundwater quality, and also to enable cost-effective counter measures in case of a failure. The detection monitoring problem typically has a multi-objective nature. A multi-objective decision model (called MONIDAM) which links a classic decision analysis approach with a stochastic simulation model is applied to determine the optimal groundwater monitoring system given uncertainties due to the hydrogeological conditions and contaminant source characteristics. A Monte Carlo approach is used to incorporate uncertainties. Hydraulic conductivity and the leak location are the random inputs of the simulation model. The design objectives considered in the model are: (1) maximizing the detection probability, (2) minimizing the contaminated area and, (3) minimize the total cost of the monitoring system. The results show that the monitoring systems located close to the source are optimal except for the cases with very high unit installation and sampling cost and/or very cheap unit remediation cost.
Received: 08 Nov 2005 – Discussion started: 03 Jan 2006
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Water Resources Section, The Netherlands
A. M. M. Elfeki
King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Saudi Arabia
on leave from: Irrigation and Hydraulics Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
C. van den Akker
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Water Resources Section, The Netherlands
F. M. Dekking
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, The Netherlands