Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-3-135-2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-3-135-2006
16 Feb 2006
 | 16 Feb 2006
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Scaling effect for estimating soil loss in the RUSLE model using remotely sensed geospatial data in Korea

G.-S. Lee and K.-H. Lee

Abstract. Accurate estimation of soil loss/deposition forced by rainfall events plays a major role in water resources management and it directly affects the quality of agricultural land and water storage capacity in reservoirs. In this paper, the soil loss model, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was used to quantify soil loss in a small basin located in southern part of Korea. The surface characteristics, such as soil texture, elevation, and vegetation type, are needed to run the RUSLE model. Remotely sensed geospatial data has been successfully used to derive suitable model factors for this purpose. It is, however, difficult to select the grid size of elements for the best fit, which is, often, decided in a subjective and intuitive way. A GIS spatial analysis was performed to investigate the scaling effect for estimating soil loss in the RUSLE model using the remotely sensed geospatial data. The results show that the L- and S- factors are sensitive to the grid size and the optimal resolution to quantify soil loss in the RUSLE model for the study site is 125 m. This approach presents a method to select the suitable scale for estimating soil loss using the remotely sensed geospatial data and eventually improve the prediction of soil loss in a basin scale.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
G.-S. Lee and K.-H. Lee
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
G.-S. Lee and K.-H. Lee
G.-S. Lee and K.-H. Lee

Viewed

Total article views: 2,207 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,512 617 78 2,207 112 120
  • HTML: 1,512
  • PDF: 617
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 2,207
  • BibTeX: 112
  • EndNote: 120
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024