the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Impacts of Inter-basin Water Diversion Projects on the Feedback Loops of Water Supply-Hydropower Generation-Environment Conservation Nexus
Abstract. To balance water resource distribution among different areas, inter-basin water diversion projects (IWDPs) have been constructed around world. The unclear feedback loops of water supply-hydropower generation-environmental conservation (SHE) nexus with IWDPs increase the uncertainty in the rational scheduling of water resources for the water receiving and water donation areas. To address the different impacts of IWDPs on the dynamic SHE nexus and explore collaborative states, a framework was proposed to identify these impacts across the multiple temporal and spatial scales in a reservoirs group. The proposed approach was applied to the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB) in China as a case study. Multiple temporal and spatial scales runoffs from HRB were provided through the Variable Infiltration Capacity hydrological (VIC) model. And multi-level ecological flows and their corresponding multi-level ecological flow standards were also determined by the Modified Tennant Method Based on Multilevel Habitat Conditions (MTMMHC) method. 30 scenarios were set and modeled in a multisource input-output reservoir generalization model. Differences between scenarios were quantified with a response ratio indicator. The results indicated that: there are negative feedbacks between water supply (S) and hydropower generation (H), between S and environmental conservation (E) while positive feedbacks between H and E without IWDPs. The negative feedbacks of S on H and the positive feedbacks of E on H are weakened or even broken in abundant water periods. Water donation has negative impacts on feedback loops, while water receiving has positive impacts on these feedbacks. Feedback loops exhibit intrinsic similarity and stability across different time scales. Feedbacks in reservoirs with regulation function remain stable under the varying inflow conditions and feedbacks for downstream reservoirs are influenced by their upstream reservoirs, especially in low flow periods. The proposed approach can help quantify the impacts of IWDPs on SHE nexus and contribute to the sustainable development of SHE nexus.
- Preprint
(2935 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-399', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jan 2025
reply
 An interesting paper quantifying competition and collaboration in the feedback loops of the SHE nexus and how these feedbacks are impacted by IWDPs at different time scales. I have attached my comments.
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Shijun Chen, 06 Feb 2025
reply
This manuscript proposed a framework to address the different impacts of inter-basin water diversion projects on the dynamic water supply- hydropower generation- environment conservation nexus and to explore collaborative states across the multiple temporal and spatial scales.The proposed approach was applied to the Hanjiang River Basin in China, and the results clearly illustrate the SHE nexus within the basin and the impacts of inter-basin water diversion projects on it. This study is very interesting and aligns well with the requirements of the HESS.Although the method are reasonable and the result is abundant, there are still some points that should be emphasized to improve the quality of the paper.
1)While the methodology employed in the manuscript effectively addresses the issue of identifying the SHE nexus across multiple temporal and spatial scales, it is important to elaborate on the advantages of the chosen approach in the methodology or introduction section, rather than merely stating its ability to solve the problem.
2)The elements presented in Figure 4 are insufficient to clearly illustrate the geographical characteristics of the study area. Additionally, it is necessary to label the names of various hydrological stations and reservoirs on the map, so that readers can more easily interpret the information. The clarity of Figure 6 should be improved, and the color scheme used to differentiate observed and simulated data needs to be adjusted for better distinction. Furthermore, the title of Figure 6 could be simplified for conciseness.
3)Is the framework proposed in the manuscript broadly applicable? It might be helpful for the manuscript to provide a clearer explanation of the framework and further clarify the scope of applicability of the proposed method.
4)The manuscript offers limited description of the baseline scenarios. This section could be expanded to clarify the rationale behind the selection of the baseline scenarios, enabling readers to better understand the results.
5)The results and discussion section is too long, please make it more conciser and highlight the key results.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-399-RC2
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Shijun Chen, 06 Feb 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
149 | 22 | 4 | 175 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 149
- PDF: 22
- XML: 4
- Total: 175
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1