the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A New Method Towards More Rational Drought Propagation Characterization in Karst Regions
Abstract. Drought propagation time (TP) and lag time (TL) from meteorological to hydrological droughts are two important indicators for characterizing drought propagation, and thus, reasonable estimates of these indicators are conducive to improve the prediction of hydrological droughts. However, traditional quantification methods are mostly based on moving correlations of whole hydro-meteorological series, including the misinformative non-drought periods. Particularly for the karst regions, the flashy regime of rainfall-runoff relationship during non-drought periods might strongly bias the estimations of the drought propagation indicators. In this study, we propose a new method that use only the informative drought-period data to better quantify the above indicators. Moreover, we compared the effectiveness between the new and traditional methods in regions with different karstification degrees. The results revealed that: (1) hydrological drought events generally exhibited reduced frequencies, longer durations, and smaller deficit volumes than the corresponding meteorological drought events; (2) compared to conventional methods, the TP and TL obtained by using the new method better meet the practical requirements for monitoring more hydrological drought deficit volume, especially in karst regions; (3) the karstification degree is a key factor influencing the difference between the results obtained using the new and traditional methods, and the superiority of the new method is more pronounced with stronger karstification degrees of the region. The above results can improve our understanding of the drought propagation features in karst regions and can provide an evidence-base for precautional drought-mitigation actions.
- Preprint
(2207 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 16 Apr 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-308', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Mar 2025
reply
This manuscript proposes a new method based on drought-period data for characterizing drought propagation in karst regions. This method avoids the interference of data from non-drought periods, especially addressing the applicability issue in karst regions, and contrasts it with the limitations of traditional methods affected by non-drought period data. The research findings have practical significance for drought early warning and water resources management, particularly in karst regions where it is difficult to accurately simulate using hydrological models. However, due to the following issues, the manuscript currently does not meet the publication requirements of the HESS journal.
The specific comments are as follows:- The groundwater hydrological characteristics in karst regions have not been specifically quantified. Only a general description of "karstification degree" is used, which weakens the depth of the mechanism explanation. It is recommended to supplement karst development parameters (such as karst porosity, groundwater level dynamic data) or cite existing geological survey results, and clarify the classification criteria for karstification degree (such as based on the proportion of karst area or hydrogeological zoning).
- The data time range (1957–2008) is relatively early. Why not use more recent data? The impact of climate change in the past decade or so has been more significant. It is recommended to discuss the potential impact of climate change (such as the increased frequency of extreme precipitation) on drought propagation characteristics.
- In Figure 3, "meteorological drought inde" is used for all indices, while "index" is used in the text. Is this a spelling error or does it have a specific meaning?
- The new method has obvious limitations as it is only compared between karst and non-karst basins. It is recommended to increase case verifications in different climate zones (such as arid and humid zones), or cite existing studies to illustrate the transfer potential of the method. In the "Discussion" section, supplement the analysis of the applicability to other types of droughts (such as agricultural drought) to clarify the boundaries of the method.
- The description of some statistical tests is vague (for example, the Tp value of the Kruskal-Wallis H test is not fully labeled), and the impact of the sample size (such as the number of drought events) on the results has not been explained.
- The mechanism of the differences in TP and TL in karst regions has not been fully explored. It is only attributed to "weak regulation and storage capacity", lacking quantitative support from hydrogeological processes. It is recommended to analyze how the interaction between rapid runoff and slow seepage in karst areas prolongs the drought propagation time by combining groundwater flow models or field observation data, to enhance the scientific nature of the conclusion.
- Some figure citations are incomplete (for example, the descriptions of Figure 1 and Figure 5 have insufficient correspondence with the text), and the variable definitions in Equation (1) have not been fully explained. It is recommended to ensure that all chart titles and axis labels are complete, and explain key charts one by one in the text.
- The text descriptions and explanations of the figures are too simple, making it difficult to understand the specific meaning of the figures, especially for Figure 3 and Figure 4. For example, in Figure 3, there are three sub - figures (upper, middle, and lower), and the upper sub - figure is further divided into left and right parts, but the differences between them are not explained. In Figure 4, the bottom sub - figure lacks the label (c).
- The most crucial factors affecting the propagation from meteorological drought to hydrological drought in karst regions are the heterogeneity and sensitivity of the karst spatial structure. In particular, the drought propagation in different karst compartments has obvious differences. However, this part of the discussion is missing in the paper.
- It is recommended to use some specific terms. For example, "karsification degree" should preferably be replaced with the more common "karst development intensity" or refer to international karst classification standards (such as Ford & Williams, 2007).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-308-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
104 | 17 | 6 | 127 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 104
- PDF: 17
- XML: 6
- Total: 127
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1