Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-271
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-271
25 Sep 2024
 | 25 Sep 2024
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Where can rewetting of forested peatland reduce extreme flows?

Maria Elenius, Charlotta Pers, Sara Schützer, and Berit Arheimer

Abstract. Historical drainage to improve forestry practices has resulted in 0.6–0.7 million hectares drained forested peatland in Sweden. This has reduced the storage of water in the landscape and may impact greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity and the damping of extreme water flows. National restoration actions therefore aim at rewetting 0.1 million hectares of forested peatland in Sweden, despite the limited and sometimes contradictory evidence in the impacts of rewetting. To clarify the potential impact on extreme flows and their cause-effects relationships from rewetting, we simulated flow under various conditions of the climate, local hydrology and rewetting practices (ditch blocking alone or combined with reduced tree cover). For this, we used the HYPE model setup across Sweden (450 000 km2) with improved calculations of runoff in drained forest and routines for inflow and outflow regions. National evaluation of changes in discharge extremes was combined with a detailed study in south-east Sweden, with the aim to understand rewetting impacts at various scales. We found that the change in discharge extremes from catchments of 10 km2 is small, because there is considerable mixing with runoff from various landcover. Hence, at the larger scale, rewetting is not an efficient measure to combat droughts or floods. However, for ecosystems in the streams only draining peatlands, rewetting can have an impact if appropriate sites for restoration are selected. The results show that groundwater level prior to rewetting and reduced tree cover are governing the effect on water runoff. Wetland allocation and management practices are thus crucial if the purpose is to reduce flow extremes in peatland streams.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Maria Elenius, Charlotta Pers, Sara Schützer, and Berit Arheimer

Status: open (until 20 Nov 2024)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Maria Elenius, Charlotta Pers, Sara Schützer, and Berit Arheimer

Data sets

Research data for the article Elenius et al, 'Where can rewetting of forested peatland reduce extreme flows?' Maria Elenius et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13472209

Maria Elenius, Charlotta Pers, Sara Schützer, and Berit Arheimer

Viewed

Total article views: 34 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
32 1 1 34 0 0
  • HTML: 32
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 34
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 33 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 33 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Sep 2024
Download
Short summary
Simulations of peatland rewetting in Sweden under various conditions of climate, local hydrology and rewetting practices showed insubstantial changes in landscape flow extremes due to mixing with runoff from various landcover. The impact on local hydrological extremes are governed by groundwater levels prior to rewetting and reduced tree cover, hence wetland allocation and management practices are crucial if the purpose is to reduce flow extremes in peatland streams.