the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Significance of the Leaf-Area-Index on the Evapotranspiration Estimation in SWAT-T for Characteristic Land Cover Types of Western Africa
Abstract. Evapotranspiration (ET) plays a pivotal role in the terrestrial water cycle in sub-humid and tropical regions. Thereby, the contribution of plant transpiration can be distinctively greater than the soil evaporation. The seasonal dynamics of plant phenology, e.g., commonly represented as the vegetation attribute leaf-area-index (LAI), closely correlates with actual ET (AET). Addressing the reciprocal LAI-AET interaction is hence essential for practitioners and researchers to comprehensively quantify the hydrological processes in water resources management, particularly in the perennially vegetated regions of Western Africa. However due to the lack of field measurements, the evaluation of the LAI-AET interaction still remains challenging. Hence, our study aims to improve the understanding of the role of LAI on the AET estimation with the investigation of characteristic regions of Western Africa. We setup eco-hydrological models (SWAT-T) for two homogeneous land cover types (forest and grassland) to guarantee the representativeness of field measurements for LAI and AET. To evaluate the LAI-AET interaction in SWAT-T, we apply different potential ET methods (Hargreaves, Penman-Monteith (PET-PM), Priestley-Taylor). Further, the parameter sensitivity for 27 relevant LAI-AET parameters is quantified with the elementary effects method. The comprehensive parameter set is then optimized using the Shuffled-Complex-Evolution algorithm. Finally, we apply a benchmark test to assess the performance of SWAT-T to simulate AET and to determine the relevance of a detailed LAI modelling. The results show that SWAT-T is capable to accurately predict LAI and AET on the footprint scale. While all three PET methods facilitate an adequate modelling of LAI and AET, PET-PM outperforms the methods for AET independent of the land cover type. Moreover, the benchmarking highlights that if an optimization process only accounts for LAI but disregards AET data, its prediction of AET still yields an adequate performance with SWAT-T for all PET methods and land cover types. Our findings demonstrate that the significance of a detailed LAI modelling on the AET estimation is more pronounced in the forested than in the grassland region.
- Preprint
(3861 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 12 Jul 2024)
-
CC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-131', Santiago Valencia, 18 May 2024
reply
Test
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131-CC1 -
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-131', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Jun 2024
reply
Manuscript number: hess-2024-131
Title: The Significance of the Leaf-Area-Index on the Evapotranspiration Estimation in SWAT-T for Characteristic Land Cover Types of Western Africa
Merk et al. explore the role of the Leaf Area Index (LAI) on the actual evapotranspiration (AET) by assessing the LAI-AET interactions in the SWAT-T model for forest and grassland land cover types in Western Africa. Using different potential ET (Hargreaves, Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor) methods and benchmark tests, manuscripts highlight that SWAT-T is capable of accurately predicting LAI-AET on the footprint scale for forest and grassland. Additionally, the benchmark analysis shows that the SWAT-T model can predict satisfactory AET based on only LAI calibration for all PET methods and land cover types. The study provides new insights into how the wide SWAT model simulates AET and its interactions with LAI, which is a suitable topic for publication in the Hydrology and Earth System Sciences journal. However, I have some comments that should be addressed before publication.
Major comments:
- The authors described that forest and grassland were defined with FRSD and RNGE land use codes from the SWAT crop data based on lines 203-204. However, it is not clear if their parametrization (i.e., initial values and calibration range) were adapted for tropical vegetation characteristics. In particular, the final values for some parameters like T_OPT (optimal temperature for plant growth) may not be realistic for the study region (see Alemayehu et al., 2017 results). For example, Tables A1 and A2 show that T_OPT final values for grassland and forest vegetation were larger than 35 Celsius degrees for all approaches and PET methods, except for forest in lower benchmark analysis. Thus, are realistic the final parameter values (e.g., T_OPT, T_BASE, RCHRG_DP)?
- The study highlights that “if an optimization process only accounts for LAI but disregards AET data, its prediction of AET still yields an adequate performance with SWAT-T for all PET methods and land cover types”. This represents an important contribution due to the lack of AET ground observations in tropical regions. However:
- Do you expect similar results for streamflow? Despite performance metrics showing that AET results are acceptable considering only LAI data, it is interesting to discuss what would be the performance of other water balance processes.
- How would be the LAI-AET interactions using only remote-sensing datasets (e.g., AET and LAI from MODIS)?
- The authors state that their results are transferable to other regions in Lines 543-544. However, it is necessary to provide further details regarding the generalization of their findings considering:
- Heterogeneous land cover and soil properties. Indeed, the SWA-T model was set up with a single HRU in this study.
- Do you expect similar results for larger watersheds (e.g., 10 – 100 km2)?
- Are the results similar for forested areas with a larger LAI (e.g., Amazon and Congo forests).
- Although ET is mainly controlled by water limitations in tropical ecosystems, some mountain areas exhibit energy limitations. What are the implications of the study’s finding for energy vs water limited ecosystems?
Minor comments:
- Lines 33-40: Many SWAT studies also have used ET data from remote-sensing datasets such as MODIS (e.g., Qiao et al., 2022; Rajib et al., 2018)
- Lines 50-55: Additional SWAT-T applications: Hoyos et al., 2019
- Lines 85-90: What tool or software was used for sensitivity analysis? SWAT-CUP?
- Lines 180-185: Are savanna dynamics affected by cropland management?
- Figure 2b: What is the annual cycle of solar radiation, relative humidity, and wind speed?
- Figure 2c: Why does AET decrease during the wet season? Could this pattern suggest an energy-limited environment? Include observed LAI.
- Line 222: Was the analysis also conducted for the grassland site?
- Figure 3: Include panel letters (a, b, c) and supplementary figures for other parameters.
- Line 315: What does mean “can be decisive”? Significant?
- Figure 4: Please consider color-blind palettes (apply in all figures).
- Figures 6 and 7: Daily time-scale results. Include panel letters. Plotting percentage anomalies can provide a clear idea of AET and LAI differences between observations and simulations. Please also include an annual cycle plot to show the results for dry and wet seasons (Lines 445-447).
- Lines 450-455: LAI is almost always lower than 3 for both forest and grassland vegetation (Figure 7).
References
Alemayehu, Tadesse, et al. "An improved SWAT vegetation growth module and its evaluation for four tropical ecosystems." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21.9 (2017): 4449-4467.
Hoyos, N., Correa-Metrio, A., Jepsen, S.M., Wemple, B., Valencia, S., Marsik, M., Doria, R., Escobar, J., Restrepo, J.C., Velez, M.I., 2019. Modeling Streamflow Response to Persistent Drought in a Coastal Tropical Mountainous Watershed, Sierra Nevada De Santa Marta, Colombia. Water 11, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010094
Qiao, Lei, et al. "Improvement of evapotranspiration estimates for grasslands in the southern Great Plains: Comparing a biophysical model (SWAT) and remote sensing (MODIS)." Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 44 (2022): 101275.
Rajib, Adnan, Venkatesh Merwade, and Zhiqiang Yu. "Rationale and efficacy of assimilating remotely sensed potential evapotranspiration for reduced uncertainty of hydrologic models." Water Resources Research 54.7 (2018): 4615-4637.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-131-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
258 | 97 | 17 | 372 | 7 | 9 |
- HTML: 258
- PDF: 97
- XML: 17
- Total: 372
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1