the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Combining time-lapse electrical resistivity and self-potential methods to assess soil moisture dynamics in a forested catchment under the rainfall event
Abstract. Infiltration process and soil moisture dynamics in response to rainfall are crucial for subsurface flow generation, landslide hazard control, and hydro-ecosystem management. Geophysical tools such as the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self-potential (SP) method have proven useful in providing greater temporal and spatial subsurface information and making connections to water content or water flux. In this study, the combination of ERT and SP was used to enhance our understanding of water infiltration processes caused by natural rainfall, subsurface structures, and plant root distribution. We installed 100 ERT electrodes with an electrode spacing of 0.5 m on a tree-covered hillslope to conduct ERT surveys every two weeks from June to October 2022, and increase the frequency of measurements during rainfall events. Non-polarized electrodes were used to measure SP along the hillslope and at various depths. Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) sensors were used to obtain the soil water content as an accurate reference to establish the petrophysical relationship between soil moisture and resistivity. Based on the robustness assessment of these relationships, the results suggest that the Dipole-Dipole configuration may help to obtain a more reasonable interpretation of resistivity at the forest site than the Wenner configuration. The joint interpretation of the SP and ERT results showed that water flow in the study area is dominated by vertical direction, and two preferential flow paths due to the fractured and permeable soil layer interface provide important vertical hydrological connections between deep and shallow soil layers. In addition, the subsurface infiltration processes were strongly influenced by the trees with different root characteristics. Trees with shallow roots tend to retain more water content at the surface. Deep-rooted trees absorb and store water in deeper layers, resulting in significant abrupt changes in the water content of the deeper soil layers. The results of this study provide a basis for investigating the hydrological connectivity and climate sensitivity of soil water distribution by linking rainfall with subsurface information provided by the ERT and SP.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(2834 KB)
-
Supplement
(4061 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(2834 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4061 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2023-190', Jacopo Boaga, 30 Oct 2023
The paper represents a relevant example of ERT and SP for the characterisation of forested catchment. The paper meets the scope of HESS and deserves publication after few minor revisione listed here below.
Ln 84 resolution of decimetres may seem too  ambitious, since your spacing was 0.5 m. Maybe you can chance in a generic ' high resolution'.
Ln 95-100 maybe ';' instead of '.' in the list
Fig 1 provide latitude and longitude of the area for a better geographical constrain.
Ln 132 missing dot at the end of the  sentence
Fig 2 panel showing the vertical deployment of instruments is not clear, maybe insert axis as depth cm
Ln 161 How was put the water if the system works unattended and managed from remote ? Not clear this part
Ln 164 why it was not possible to collect reciprocals in dipole dipole  array configuration? You should have more robust error estimation
Ln 168 for contact resistance problem affecting inversion consider  DOI 10.1002/nsg.12192
Ln 190 how the 3% error was chosen? Â what about stacking error in the dataset?
Fig. 5 why time lapse is presented with different reference background ? Maybe caption must be improved
Fig. 7 explain in caption what is the grey dashed line
Ln 436. How many channel can manage the adopted GD-20 Instrument? Â In the market there are several georesistivimeter able to measure all the potentials electrodes combination in one time (eg for dipole-dipole). This would considerably reduce the amount of time for acquisition.
Ln 476 for 'piston effect' in ERT findings and old water consider Cassiani et al 2016 (DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.113)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aimin Liao, 09 Nov 2023
Dear Prof. Jacopo Boaga:
We would like to thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. Taking into account all your comments, we have revised our paper thoroughly. All amendments were listed in this response (uploaded as a supplement) and shown in the revised manuscript with tracked changes.
Thank you again for your attention to our paper and this response!
Sincerely,
Aimin Liao et al.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Jacopo Boaga, 14 Nov 2023
Authors fully replied to my comments. The revised version of the manuscript can be considered acceptable from my view,
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Prof. Jacopo Boaga:
It is a great honor to receive your recognition for our work. We sincerely appreciate all your valuable comments and suggestions that have significantly enhanced the quality of our paper.
Sincerely,
Aimin Liao et al.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Jacopo Boaga, 14 Nov 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aimin Liao, 09 Nov 2023
-
RC3: 'Comment on hess-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2023
Dear authors,Â
with interest I read your paper on "Combining time-lapse electrical resistivity and self-potential methods to assess soil moisture dynamics in a forested catchment under the rainfall event". Your paper presents an interesting case study that highlights the joint use of ERT and SP to detect and image flow pathways, which is almost impossible using conventional soil water sensors. The paper is well written and easy to follow and succinct, but in some parts I'm missing detail. This is the case, e.g., for the description of the timelapse inversion strategy, which is completely missing, and a more detailed description of the experimental setup. The repetition rate for the rainfall experiment is only mentioned in the results.Â
Next to these rather minor comments, I am not fully convinced by the conclusions the authors have drawn from there data. You assign the spatially variable resistivity response solely to variations in vegetation cover and hence various root networks. Yet, while your soil analysis shows a reasonable homogeneous soil, the deeper resistivity may indicate a variation in bedrock composition. This is also indicated by the seismic velocities. Hence, I'm not fully convinced by the effect of the vegetation that is claimed to have been imaged, and I would suggest that the authors provide more info on the bedrock composition, which may be retrieved from deeper ERT and perhaps a detailed view of the SRT data.Â
In the attached you will find some more detailed comments. Â
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Dear reviewer,
We would like to thank you for your professional review work on our article. Following your suggestions, we have modified our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing. All amendments were listed in this response (uploaded as a supplement) and shown in the revised manuscript with tracked changes.
Thank you again for your attention to our paper and this response!Â
Best regards,
Aimin Liao et al.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2023-190', Jacopo Boaga, 30 Oct 2023
The paper represents a relevant example of ERT and SP for the characterisation of forested catchment. The paper meets the scope of HESS and deserves publication after few minor revisione listed here below.
Ln 84 resolution of decimetres may seem too  ambitious, since your spacing was 0.5 m. Maybe you can chance in a generic ' high resolution'.
Ln 95-100 maybe ';' instead of '.' in the list
Fig 1 provide latitude and longitude of the area for a better geographical constrain.
Ln 132 missing dot at the end of the  sentence
Fig 2 panel showing the vertical deployment of instruments is not clear, maybe insert axis as depth cm
Ln 161 How was put the water if the system works unattended and managed from remote ? Not clear this part
Ln 164 why it was not possible to collect reciprocals in dipole dipole  array configuration? You should have more robust error estimation
Ln 168 for contact resistance problem affecting inversion consider  DOI 10.1002/nsg.12192
Ln 190 how the 3% error was chosen? Â what about stacking error in the dataset?
Fig. 5 why time lapse is presented with different reference background ? Maybe caption must be improved
Fig. 7 explain in caption what is the grey dashed line
Ln 436. How many channel can manage the adopted GD-20 Instrument? Â In the market there are several georesistivimeter able to measure all the potentials electrodes combination in one time (eg for dipole-dipole). This would considerably reduce the amount of time for acquisition.
Ln 476 for 'piston effect' in ERT findings and old water consider Cassiani et al 2016 (DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.113)
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aimin Liao, 09 Nov 2023
Dear Prof. Jacopo Boaga:
We would like to thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions. Taking into account all your comments, we have revised our paper thoroughly. All amendments were listed in this response (uploaded as a supplement) and shown in the revised manuscript with tracked changes.
Thank you again for your attention to our paper and this response!
Sincerely,
Aimin Liao et al.
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Jacopo Boaga, 14 Nov 2023
Authors fully replied to my comments. The revised version of the manuscript can be considered acceptable from my view,
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Dear Prof. Jacopo Boaga:
It is a great honor to receive your recognition for our work. We sincerely appreciate all your valuable comments and suggestions that have significantly enhanced the quality of our paper.
Sincerely,
Aimin Liao et al.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-190-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Reply on AC1', Jacopo Boaga, 14 Nov 2023
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Aimin Liao, 09 Nov 2023
-
RC3: 'Comment on hess-2023-190', Anonymous Referee #2, 30 Dec 2023
Dear authors,Â
with interest I read your paper on "Combining time-lapse electrical resistivity and self-potential methods to assess soil moisture dynamics in a forested catchment under the rainfall event". Your paper presents an interesting case study that highlights the joint use of ERT and SP to detect and image flow pathways, which is almost impossible using conventional soil water sensors. The paper is well written and easy to follow and succinct, but in some parts I'm missing detail. This is the case, e.g., for the description of the timelapse inversion strategy, which is completely missing, and a more detailed description of the experimental setup. The repetition rate for the rainfall experiment is only mentioned in the results.Â
Next to these rather minor comments, I am not fully convinced by the conclusions the authors have drawn from there data. You assign the spatially variable resistivity response solely to variations in vegetation cover and hence various root networks. Yet, while your soil analysis shows a reasonable homogeneous soil, the deeper resistivity may indicate a variation in bedrock composition. This is also indicated by the seismic velocities. Hence, I'm not fully convinced by the effect of the vegetation that is claimed to have been imaged, and I would suggest that the authors provide more info on the bedrock composition, which may be retrieved from deeper ERT and perhaps a detailed view of the SRT data.Â
In the attached you will find some more detailed comments. Â
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Dear reviewer,
We would like to thank you for your professional review work on our article. Following your suggestions, we have modified our manuscript and supplemented extra data to make our results convincing. All amendments were listed in this response (uploaded as a supplement) and shown in the revised manuscript with tracked changes.
Thank you again for your attention to our paper and this response!Â
Best regards,
Aimin Liao et al.
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Aimin Liao, 26 Jan 2024
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
447 | 167 | 42 | 656 | 70 | 36 | 44 |
- HTML: 447
- PDF: 167
- XML: 42
- Total: 656
- Supplement: 70
- BibTeX: 36
- EndNote: 44
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Wenhang Jiang
Aimin Liao
Jiufu Liu
Guodong Liu
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(2834 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(4061 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote