the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Climate-change impact on reservoir evaporation and water availability in a tropical sub-humid region, north-eastern Brazil
Gláuber Pontes Rodrigues
Arlena Brosinsky
Ítalo Sampaio Rodrigues
George Leite Mamede
José Carlos de Araújo
Abstract. The potential effects of climatic changes on water resources are crucial to be assessed, particularly in dry regions such as Northeast Brazil (1 million km2), where water supply is highly reliant on open-water reservoirs. This study analyses the impact of evaporation (by the Penman method) on water availability for four scenarios based on two regional climatic models (Eta-CanESM2 and Eta-MIROC5) under the Representative Concentration Pathways 4.5 and 8.5. We compared the water availability in the period of 2071–2100 with that of the historical period (1961–2005). The scenarios derived from the Eta-CanESM2 model indicate an increase in dry season evaporative rate (2 % and 6 %, respectively) by the end of the century. Unlike the above scenarios, the ones derived from the Eta-MIROC5 model both show a decrease in dry season evaporative rate of −2 %. Consequently, for a 90 % reliability level, the expected reservoir capacity to supply water with high reliability is reduced in 80 %. It is reasonable to state that both patterns of future evaporation in the reservoirs may prove to be plausible. Because model-based projections of climate impact on water resources can be quite divergent, it is necessary to develop adaptations that do not need quantitative projections of changes in hydrological variables, but rather ranges of projected values. Our analysis shows how open water reservoirs might be impacted by climate change in dry regions. These findings complement a body of knowledge on estimation of water availability in a changing climate and provide new data and insights on water management in reservoir-dependent drylands.
- Preprint
(1717 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(401 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Gláuber Pontes Rodrigues et al.
Status: open (until 27 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2023-189', Maarten Krol, 23 Nov 2023
reply
The paper relevantly discusses the potential effects of climate-change-induced changes in reservoir evaporation in a region where water supply critically depends on reservoirs. The paper is clear in its methods, transparent in results and conclusions.
Still, some concerns remain, partly on the clarity of the research goal and on some methodological choices.
Where the goal of the paper is, to assess the uncertainty in climate change impacts on reservoir evaporation and water availability from reservoirs, it is important to observe that direct climate change effects on evaporation are studied, but climate change effects on hydrology and runoff (reservoir inflow) are not; the character of the study therefore is a sensitivity study on a specific process rather than a more integrated climate change assessment. That does not make the study less relevant, but this difference is important for water availability impacts and should be explicit in the description of the scope or even the title.
In the research methods, choices for climate scenario data are partly unexplained and partly limitedly connected to the research aims. Results from two GCMs is used; the choice of GCMs is implicit, where an explicit choice was expected, relating to the uncertainty envelope of simulated evaporation trends under climate change: extended the explanation of the choice may resolve this issue. The choice of RCP scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP 8.5) covers the median to upper range of climate change, where the uncertainty envelope does include more modest changes too. Here an addition of e.g. RCP 2.6 seems to remain consistent with the goal.
One specific assumption in the research methods requires more attention in the form of more discussion or reconsideration. Evaporation over land and over water are linearly related, based on an average of their ratio from (well-)analysed periods. The periods do show a very wide range in that ratio however, and it is likely that the ratio per period analysed depends on drought conditions. Therefore the relation, if expressed in a stationary ratio, can be expected to be sensitive to climate change. Here at least an extensive discussion is expected; an analysis and possible reconsideration is advised: results may be expected to significantly change.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-189-RC1
Gláuber Pontes Rodrigues et al.
Gláuber Pontes Rodrigues et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
272 | 68 | 9 | 349 | 18 | 4 | 7 |
- HTML: 272
- PDF: 68
- XML: 9
- Total: 349
- Supplement: 18
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1