Understanding the diurnal cycle of land-atmosphere interactions from flux site observations
- Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, United States
- Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, 22030, United States
Abstract. Land–atmosphere interactions have been investigated at daily or longer time scales due to limited data availability and large sensor errors for measuring high-frequency signals. Yet coupling at the sub-daily time scale is characterized by the diurnal cycle of incoming solar radiation and soil wetness. Based on flux tower observations, this study investigates the climatology of the observed land–atmosphere interactions on a sub-daily time scale during the warm season. Process-based multivariate metrics are employed to quantitatively measure the segmented coupling processes and the mixing diagram is adopted to demonstrate the integrative moist and thermal energy budget evolution in the atmospheric mixed layer. The land, atmosphere, and combined couplings for the entire daily mean, midday, and midnight show the different situations to which surface latent and sensible heat fluxes are relevant, and they also reveal the climate sensitivity to soil moisture and surface air temperature. The coevolution of the diurnal moisture and thermal energy within the boundary layer traces a particular path on mixing diagrams, exhibiting different degrees of hysteresis in water– and energy–limited locations. Water– and energy–limited processes also show opposing long tails during the daytime and night-time related to the impact on the land and atmospheric couplings via latent heat flux and other diabatic processes like radiative cooling. This study illustrates the necessity of considering the whole diurnal cycle to understand land-atmosphere coupling processes comprehensively in observations and modelling.
-
Notice on discussion status
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
-
Preprint
(1337 KB)
-
Supplement
(338 KB)
-
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1337 KB) -
Supplement
(338 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Eunkyo Seo and Paul Alan Dirmeyer
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2022-216', Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arellano, 06 Jul 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Eunkyo Seo, 12 Aug 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2022-216', Timothy Lahmers, 08 Aug 2022
This manuscript will be a major contribution to the hydrometeorology community due to its thorough review of land-atmosphere interactions based on flux tower measurements. The authors demonstrate how fluxes between the land surface and the atmosphere change throughout the diurnal cycle, and they show how these processes differ in water-limited and energy-limited environments. As there are still some content and technical issues with this manuscript, I recommend that this manuscript be accepted with major revisions.
Major Comments:
1) Section 3.1: When analysis days were selected, major precipitation events were removed based on daily soil moisture tendencies. Is the 2-standard deviation threshold in soil moisture tendencies, for removing precipitation days from the analysis, sufficient? This method could still theoretically be affected by convection, especially in more arid environments where deep convection may occur even if rainfall is relatively light.
2) Section 3.4: The authors selected a method to separate water and energy-limited environments using a correlation between soil water content and evaporative fraction. Could the authors provide prior literature or observation data to justify this method? Has this selection method been compared to other widely used proxies for aridity, such as the Budyko curve?
3) Section 5: The findings of this paper are important for both the atmospheric modeling and observation applications of the PBL community. I would suggest that the conclusions include a more substantial discussion of the implications of this work for future atmospheric model development, such as for PBL parameterizations in mesoscale models. Also, consider breaking section 5 up into two sections. Lines 400-478 are more of a summary, while lines 479-499 are more of a discussion about the significance and potential for future work based on these results. These new sections could be broken up accordingly.
Technical/Minor Comments:
The figures provide useful information to the readers; however, the labels and values shown on the x and y-axis are relatively small and difficult to read. Consider revising the figures to make key values for the reader more legible.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Eunkyo Seo, 12 Aug 2022
Peer review completion








Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2022-216', Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arellano, 06 Jul 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Eunkyo Seo, 12 Aug 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2022-216', Timothy Lahmers, 08 Aug 2022
This manuscript will be a major contribution to the hydrometeorology community due to its thorough review of land-atmosphere interactions based on flux tower measurements. The authors demonstrate how fluxes between the land surface and the atmosphere change throughout the diurnal cycle, and they show how these processes differ in water-limited and energy-limited environments. As there are still some content and technical issues with this manuscript, I recommend that this manuscript be accepted with major revisions.
Major Comments:
1) Section 3.1: When analysis days were selected, major precipitation events were removed based on daily soil moisture tendencies. Is the 2-standard deviation threshold in soil moisture tendencies, for removing precipitation days from the analysis, sufficient? This method could still theoretically be affected by convection, especially in more arid environments where deep convection may occur even if rainfall is relatively light.
2) Section 3.4: The authors selected a method to separate water and energy-limited environments using a correlation between soil water content and evaporative fraction. Could the authors provide prior literature or observation data to justify this method? Has this selection method been compared to other widely used proxies for aridity, such as the Budyko curve?
3) Section 5: The findings of this paper are important for both the atmospheric modeling and observation applications of the PBL community. I would suggest that the conclusions include a more substantial discussion of the implications of this work for future atmospheric model development, such as for PBL parameterizations in mesoscale models. Also, consider breaking section 5 up into two sections. Lines 400-478 are more of a summary, while lines 479-499 are more of a discussion about the significance and potential for future work based on these results. These new sections could be broken up accordingly.
Technical/Minor Comments:
The figures provide useful information to the readers; however, the labels and values shown on the x and y-axis are relatively small and difficult to read. Consider revising the figures to make key values for the reader more legible.
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Eunkyo Seo, 12 Aug 2022
Peer review completion








Journal article(s) based on this preprint
Eunkyo Seo and Paul Alan Dirmeyer
Eunkyo Seo and Paul Alan Dirmeyer
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
422 | 159 | 16 | 597 | 32 | 4 | 5 |
- HTML: 422
- PDF: 159
- XML: 16
- Total: 597
- Supplement: 32
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.
- Preprint
(1337 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(338 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote