Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-626
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-626
 
22 Dec 2021
22 Dec 2021
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Comparing the runoff decompositions of small testbed catchments: end-member mixing analysis against hydrological modelling

Andrey Bugaets1, Boris Gartsman1,2, Tatiana Gubareva1,2, Sergei Lupakov1, Andrey Kalugin2, Vladimir Shamov1, and Leonid Gonchukov1,2 Andrey Bugaets et al.
  • 1Pacific Institute of Geography, FEB RAS, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia
  • 2Water Problems Institute, RAS, Moscow, 117971, Russia

Abstract. This study is focused on the comparison of catchment streamflow composition simulated with three well-known rainfall-runoff (RR) models (ECOMAG, HBV, SWAT) against hydrograph decomposition onto the principal constituents evaluated from End-Member Mixing Analysis (EMMA). There used the data provided by the short-term in-situ observations at two small mountain-taiga experimental catchments located in the south of Pacific Russia. All used RR models demonstrate that two neighboring small catchments disagree significantly in mutual dynamics of the runoff fractions due to geological and landscape structure differences. The geochemical analysis confirmed the differences in runoff generation processes at both studied catchments. The assessment of proximity of the runoff constituents to the hydrograph decomposition with the EMMA that makes a basis for the RR models benchmark analysis. We applied three data aggregation intervals (season, month and pentad) to find a reasonable data generalization period ensuring results clarity. In terms of runoff composition, the most conformable RR model to EMMA is found to be ECOMAG, HBV gets close to reflect specific runoff events well enough, SWAT gives distinctive behavior against other models. The study shows that along with using the standard efficiency criteria reflected proximity of simulated and modelling values of runoff, compliance with the EMMA results might give useful auxiliary information for hydrological modelling results validation.

Andrey Bugaets et al.

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-626', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Feb 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-626', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Feb 2022

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-626', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Feb 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-626', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Feb 2022

Andrey Bugaets et al.

Andrey Bugaets et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 634 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
500 118 16 634 7 6
  • HTML: 500
  • PDF: 118
  • XML: 16
  • Total: 634
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 609 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 609 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 25 May 2022
Download
Short summary
Comparison of streamflow composition of two small experimental catchments simulated with three well-known rainfall-runoff (RR) models against the End-Member Mixing Analysis (EMMA) results. All used RR models and EMMA outcome demonstrate that two neighboring catchments significantly different in mutual dynamics of the runoff fractions. Three data aggregation intervals (season, month and pentad) were applied to assess proximity of the RR models and EMMA hydrograph decomposition outcome.