"Large-sample assessment of spatial scaling effects of the distributed wflow_sbm hydrological model shows that finer spatial resolution does not necessarily lead to better streamflow estimates" - Interactive discussionhttps://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2021-605/2022-03-14T09:54:16+01:00Copernicus Publicationshttps://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2021-605/hess-2021-605-AC2.pdfAC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jerom Aerts, 14 Mar 2022AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jerom Aerts, 14 Mar 2022Jerom Aerts2022-03-14T09:54:15+01:002022-03-14T09:54:15+01:00https://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2021-605/hess-2021-605-AC1.pdfAC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jerom Aerts, 14 Mar 2022AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jerom Aerts, 14 Mar 2022Jerom Aerts2022-03-14T09:53:05+01:002022-03-14T09:53:05+01:00https://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2021-605/hess-2021-605-RC2.pdfRC2: 'Review of “Large-sample assessment of spatial scaling effects of the distributed wflow_sbm hydrological model shows that finer spatial resolution does not necessarily lead to better streamflow estimation” by Aerts et al., 2021', Shervan Gharari, 21 Feb 2022RC2: 'Review of “Large-sample assessment of spatial scaling effects of the distributed wflow_sbm hydrological model shows that finer spatial resolution does not necessarily lead to better streamflow estimation” by Aerts et al., 2021', Shervan Gharari, 21 Feb 2022Shervan Gharari2022-02-21T03:27:54+01:002022-02-21T03:27:54+01:00https://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2021-605/hess-2021-605-RC1.pdfRC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-605', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Jan 2022RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-605', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Jan 2022Anonymous Referee #12022-01-18T20:09:56+01:002022-01-18T20:09:56+01:00