the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Modelling groundwater recharge, actual evaporation and transpiration in semi-arid sites of the Lake Chad Basin: The role of soil and vegetation on groundwater recharge
Abstract. The Lake Chad Basin, located in the center of North Africa, is characterized by strong climate seasonality with a pronounced short annual precipitation period and high potential evapotranspiration. Groundwater is an essential source for drinking water supply as well as for agriculture and groundwater related ecosystems. Thus, assessment of groundwater recharge is very important although difficult, because of the strong effects of evaporation and transpiration as well as limited available data.
A simple, generalized approach, which requires only a small number of field data, freely available remote sensing data as well as well-established concepts and models, is tested for assessing groundwater recharge in the southern part of the basin. This work uses the FAO-dual Kc concept to estimate E and T coefficients at six locations that differ in soil texture, climate, and vegetation conditions. Measured values of soil water content and chloride concentrations along vertical soil profiles together with different scenarios for E and T partitioning and a Bayesian calibration approach are used to numerically simulate water flow and chloride transport. Average groundwater recharge rates and the associated model uncertainty at the six locations are assessed for the 2003–2016 time-period.
Model results show that interannual variability of groundwater recharge is generally greater than the uncertainty of the modelled groundwater recharge. Furthermore, the soil moisture dynamics at all locations are limited rather by water availability for evaporation in the uppermost part of the soil and by water uptake in the root zone than by the reference evapotranspiration.
- Preprint
(2574 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1093 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-581', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Dec 2021
The authors proposed an interesting study. However, this manuscript still needs substantial improvement especially in the presentation and description. Attached is a commented PDF file. Authors are invited to improve the English form.I highly advice the help of a native speaker. In the commented file I suggest to add new Figures to present schematic overviews of the proposed methodology. The Sections are too fragmented and some sub-Sections are made of few lines (sub-Section 4.1 is just 3 lines). Figures require substantial improvement. I invite the authors to work hard on paper presentation to enhance clarity
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Vassolo, 16 Dec 2021
Thank you very much for all your pertinent comments that we will definitely include in our manuscript.
However, we do not share your view that including your corrections would imply "major changes". To our opinion, they can be easily built-in and would not need long hours of work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-581-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Vassolo, 16 Dec 2021
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-581', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Jan 2022
Please find my comments is the supplementary document
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Vassolo, 19 Jan 2022
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-581', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Dec 2021
The authors proposed an interesting study. However, this manuscript still needs substantial improvement especially in the presentation and description. Attached is a commented PDF file. Authors are invited to improve the English form.I highly advice the help of a native speaker. In the commented file I suggest to add new Figures to present schematic overviews of the proposed methodology. The Sections are too fragmented and some sub-Sections are made of few lines (sub-Section 4.1 is just 3 lines). Figures require substantial improvement. I invite the authors to work hard on paper presentation to enhance clarity
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Vassolo, 16 Dec 2021
Thank you very much for all your pertinent comments that we will definitely include in our manuscript.
However, we do not share your view that including your corrections would imply "major changes". To our opinion, they can be easily built-in and would not need long hours of work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-581-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sara Vassolo, 16 Dec 2021
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-581', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Jan 2022
Please find my comments is the supplementary document
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sara Vassolo, 19 Jan 2022
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
928 | 337 | 53 | 1,318 | 98 | 38 | 42 |
- HTML: 928
- PDF: 337
- XML: 53
- Total: 1,318
- Supplement: 98
- BibTeX: 38
- EndNote: 42
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1