Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-265
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-265

  11 Jun 2021

11 Jun 2021

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Does maximization of net carbon profit enable the prediction of vegetation behaviour in savanna sites along a precipitation gradient?

Remko Christiaan Nijzink1, Jason Beringer2, Lindsay Beaumont Hutley3, and Stanislaus Josef Schymanski1 Remko Christiaan Nijzink et al.
  • 1Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
  • 2University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
  • 3Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia

Abstract. Most terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) rely on more or less detailed information about the properties of the local vegetation. In contrast, optimality-based models require much less information about the local vegetation as they are designed to predict vegetation properties based on general principles related to natural selection and physiological limits. Although such models are not expected to reproduce current vegetation behaviour as closely as models that use local information, they promise to predict the behaviour of natural vegetation under future conditions, including the effects of physiological plasticity and shifts of species composition, which are difficult to capture by extrapolation of past observations.

A previous model intercomparison using conventional terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) revealed a range of deficiencies in reproducing water and carbon fluxes for savanna sites along a strong precipitation gradient of the North Australian Tropical Transect (Whitley et al., 2016). Here we examine the ability of an optimality-based model (the Vegetation Optimality Model, VOM) predict vegetation behaviour for the same savanna sites. The VOM optimizes key vegetation properties such as foliage cover, rooting depth and water use parameters in order to maximize the Net Carbon Profit (NCP), defined here as the difference between total carbon taken up by photosynthesis minus the carbon invested in construction and maintenance of plant organs.

Despite a reduced need for input data, the VOM performed similarly or better than the conventional TBMs in terms of reproducing the seasonal amplitude and mean annual fluxes recorded by flux towers at the different sites. It had a relative error of 0.08 for the seasonal amplitude in ET, and was among the best three models tested with the smallest relative error in the seasonal amplitude of gross primary productivity (GPP). Nevertheless, the VOM displayed some persistent deviations from observations, especially for GPP, namely an underestimation of dry season evapo-transpiration at the wettest site, suggesting that the hydrological assumptions (free drainage) have a strong influence on the results. Furthermore, our study exposes a persistent overprediction of vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons by the VOM. Our analysis revealed several areas for improvement in the VOM, including a better representation of the hydrological settings, as well as the costs and benefits related to plant water transport and light capture by the canopy.

The results of this study imply that vegetation optimality is a promising approach to explain vegetation dynamics and the resulting fluxes. It provides a way to derive vegetation properties independently from observations, and allows for a more insightful evaluation of model shortcomings as no calibration or site-specific information is required.

Remko Christiaan Nijzink et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-265', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Aug 2021
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Remko C. Nijzink, 24 Aug 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-265', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Aug 2021
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Remko C. Nijzink, 24 Aug 2021
  • RC3: 'Comment on hess-2021-265', Anonymous Referee #3, 24 Aug 2021
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Remko C. Nijzink, 24 Aug 2021

Remko Christiaan Nijzink et al.

Model code and software

VOM Stanislaus Josef Schymanski https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3630081

VOMcases Remko Christiaan Nijzink, Stanislaus Josef Schymanski https://renkulab.io/gitlab/remko.nijzink/vomcases

Remko Christiaan Nijzink et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 378 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
268 92 18 378 22 4 2
  • HTML: 268
  • PDF: 92
  • XML: 18
  • Total: 378
  • Supplement: 22
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Jun 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 325 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 325 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
Most models that simulate water and carbon exchanges with the atmosphere rely on information about vegetation, but optimality models predict vegetation properties based on general principles. Here, we use the Vegetation Optimality Model (VOM) to predict vegetation behaviour at five savanna sites. The VOM overpredicted vegetation cover and carbon uptake during the wet seasons, but performed also similarly as conventional models, which shows that vegetation optimality is a promising approach.