the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
31 Mar 2021
31 Mar 2021
Critical transitions in the hydrological system: Early-warning signals and network analysis
- 1School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- 2Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- 1School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- 2Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Abstract. In this study, we identified the critical transitions of hydrological processes including precipitation and potential evapotranspiration by analysing their early-warning signals and system-based network structures. The statistical early-warning signals are manifest in increasing trends of autocorrelation and variance in the hydrology system ranging from regional to global scales, prior to climate shifts in the 1970s and 1990s in agreement with observations. We further extended the conventional statistics-based measures of early-warning signals to system-based network analysis in urban areas across the contiguous United States. The topology of urban precipitation network features hub-periphery (clustering) and modular organization, with strong intra-regional connectivity and inter-regional gateways (teleconnection). We found that several network parameters (mean correlation coefficient, density, and clustering coefficient) gradually increased prior to the critical transition in the 1990s, signifying the enhanced synchronization among urban precipitation pattern. These topological parameters not only can serve as novel system-based early-warning signals to critical transitions in hydrological processes, but also shed new lights on structure-dynamic interactions in the complex hydrological system.
Xueli Yang et al.
Status: open (until 23 Jul 2021)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-120', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Apr 2021
reply
This paper applies the autocorrelation process and a harvested population model as well as network analysis for the early warning signals of transition in the hydrological system at the global and CONUS city scale.
Overall, the paper is well-written and certainly contains many novel ideas potentially helpful for the borader community.
I see the paper will be strengthened by
- Line 50: important role
- Line 219 – 222: discussion about the relative magnitudes of AR1 and s.d. I agree that visually figures 1b and d are quite distinct, but the authors may want to provide more information about whether any objective measures of high and low exist or any reference state exists in AR1 and s.d. in gauging the state of the system regarding how far away from the tipping point.
- In addition, it appears unclear to the reviewer whether Figure 1 is an example toy problem to illustrate the concepts or related to the main finding.
- 2.3: the beginning few sentences seem to be repetitive of part of the introduction – therefore, may be better to combine with the introduction or shorten it.
- Line 253-254: single-plural mismatch
- “The year of critical transition was determined based on the abrupt change of slopes in each cumulative time series. We then divided each original precipitation (or PET) time series into two (quasi)stationary parts using this critical transition year” – maybe good to provide in the appendix, since this is quite important. Also, may want to give more explanation for what you mean by the two parts being quasi-stationary.
- Was the critical transition year 1994 identified a priori from the method described in point 6?
- Line 326 – 332: how is the claim supported? Maybe an additional figure or if not important may choose not to mention. The reviewer is confused.
- For city-scale analysis, is each transition year for each city identified using the same method as that for global scale?
- Why is CONUS PET not analyzed? Is it due to a lack of data?
- Figure 4a, is it possible to indicate region number 1-9 corresponding to the adjacency matrix in a? This will facilitate the readers to connect the meaning of b to the spatial pattern of the network in a.
- The trend of AR1 within the moving window prior to transition year: in figures showing this metric, the non-monotonic trend can make it less useful as an indicator.
- Another question the reviewer is wondering about: I understand the paper’s network analysis focuses on the network topology structure prior to transition, but will the network structure end up being different after the transition? i.e. will the enhanced network connectivity stay or gradually ‘relax’ towards some ‘climatological equilibrium state’?
- The phrase potentially catastrophic transition may be less emphasized: the mean precipitation anomalies (for CONUS cities) are analyzed. If another variable like the maximum precipitation or number of days exceeding historical summer mean (just arbitrary examples of more catastrophic flavor), the reviewers will be more convinced.
- The reviewer thinks that making more efforts to connect the global scale to the city scale will make the paper more coherent. For example, results in Fig. 3 are partially tied to global climates. Figure 5 and Figure 2 also seem to have some connections. In the introduction, the motivation for city-scale analysis may allude to some of these findings. E.g. city-scale responses are embedded in global hydrologic cycle changes but form systemic coherent structures/patterns – highly appealing to system-based network analysis.
-
AC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-120', Zhi-Hua Wang, 25 May 2021
reply
We thank the reviewer for the constructive feedback and help in improving the quality of this manuscript. Please see attached file for detailed response (as it contains figures).
-
RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-120', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Jun 2021
reply
The authors have answered all my questions and have done a good job revising the manuscirpt. Therefore I have no further comments and would recommend acceptance.
Xueli Yang et al.
Xueli Yang et al.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 429 | 100 | 9 | 538 | 0 | 2 |
- HTML: 429
- PDF: 100
- XML: 9
- Total: 538
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1