Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-478
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-478
26 Oct 2020
 | 26 Oct 2020
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Stratigraphic Identification with Airborne Electromagnetic Methods at the Hanford Site, Washington

Piyooh Jaysaval, Judith L. Robinson, and Timothy C. Johnson

Abstract. Stratigraphic units can influence the fate and transport of subsurface contaminants within groundwater. Units having coarse-grained sediments act as preferential flow pathways, and therefore can accelerate the transport of contaminants to reach human and ecological receptors. At legacy waste sites, detailed knowledge of subsurface stratigraphy can be used for effective monitoring and remediation planning to help minimize risk to human health and the environment. Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) methods can non-invasively provide information on kilometer-scale or larger subsurface stratigraphic features and fill informational gaps in directly sampled data from sparsely located boreholes. In this paper, we present inversion results of a 412 line-km frequency-domain AEM survey to delineate subsurface stratigraphic features at the Hanford Site, located in southeastern Washington State. The inversion was performed using a massively parallel 3D electromagnetic modeling and inversion code, where the modeling is based on solving frequency-domain Maxwell’s equations using an unstructured-mesh finite-element method and the inversion employs a Gauss-Newton optimization scheme. The results are compared to an underlying geologic framework model (GFM), built by interpolating contact depths of stratigraphic units interpreted from site borehole datasets. In areas with good borehole coverage, the inversion results show a good match with the GFM to a depth of about 60 m. Outside of these areas, the inversion results exhibit inconsistencies from the assumptions made to create the GFM, demonstrating that the AEM survey results can be used to improve the understanding of the geological conceptual model.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Piyooh Jaysaval, Judith L. Robinson, and Timothy C. Johnson

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Piyooh Jaysaval, Judith L. Robinson, and Timothy C. Johnson
Piyooh Jaysaval, Judith L. Robinson, and Timothy C. Johnson

Viewed

Total article views: 855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
607 223 25 855 27 34
  • HTML: 607
  • PDF: 223
  • XML: 25
  • Total: 855
  • BibTeX: 27
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 745 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 743 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
As contaminants within groundwater prefer to flow through coarse-grained rocks, a detailed mapping of these rocks in the subsurface is vital for effective monitoring and remediation planning to help minimize risk to human health and the environment at legacy waste sites. This work provides images that are obtained from airborne electromagnetic data to delineate subsurface rocks at the Hanford Site, a nuclear waste site located in southeastern Washington State, USA.