Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-456
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-456
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  25 Sep 2020

25 Sep 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Estimating the Probability of Compound Floods in Estuarine Regions

Wenyan Wu1,2, Seth Westra2, and Michael Leonard2 Wenyan Wu et al.
  • 1The Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia
  • 2The School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Adelaide, 5005, Australia

Abstract. The quantification of flood risk in estuarine regions relies on accurate estimation of flood probability, which is often challenging due to the rareness of flood events and their multi-causal (or compound) nature. Failure to consider the compounding nature of estuarine floods can lead to significant underestimation of flood risk in these regions. This study provides a comparative review of alternative approaches for estuarine flood estimation; namely, traditional univariate flood frequency analysis applied to both observed historical data and simulated data, and multivariate frequency analysis applied to flood events. Three specific implementations of the above approaches are evaluated on a case study – the estuarine portion of Swan River in Western Australia, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. The theoretical understanding of the three approaches, combined with findings from the case study, enable generation of guidance on method selection for estuarine flood probability estimation, recognising issues such as data availability, complexity of the application/analysis process, location of interest within the estuarine region, computational demands and whether or not future conditions need to be assessed.

Wenyan Wu et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 20 Nov 2020)
Status: open (until 20 Nov 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Wenyan Wu et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 335 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
257 73 5 335 12 3 4
  • HTML: 257
  • PDF: 73
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 335
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Sep 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 274 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 274 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 26 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Flood probability estimation is important for applications such as land use planning, reservoir operation, infrastructure design and safety assessments. However, it is a challenging task, especially in estuarine areas where floods are caused by both intense rainfall and storm surge. This study provides a review of approaches to flood probability estimation in these areas. Based analysis of a real-world river system, guidance on method selection is provided.
Flood probability estimation is important for applications such as land use planning, reservoir...
Citation