Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-412
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-412
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  28 Sep 2020

28 Sep 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Spatial-temporal changes in flow hydraulic characteristics and soil loss during gully headcut erosion

Mingming Guo1, Zhuoxin Chen2, Wenlong Wang2,3, Tianchao Wang4, Qianhua Shi2, Hongliang Kang2, Man Zhao2, and Lanqian Feng3 Mingming Guo et al.
  • 1Key laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Water and Soil Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • 3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • 4Ulanyab Grassland Station, Jining, Inner Mongolia 012000, China

Abstract. The temporal-spatial changes in flow hydraulics and energy consumption and their associated soil erosion remain unclear during gully headcut retreat. A simulated scouring experiment was conducted on five headcut plots consisting of upstream area (UA), gully headwall (GH) and gully bed (GB) to elucidate the temporal-spatial changes in flow hydraulic, energy consumption, and soil loss during headcut erosion. The flow velocity at the brink of headcut increased as a power function of time, whereas the jet velocity entry to plunge pool and jet shear stress logarithmically or linearly decreased over time. The jet properties significantly affected by upstream flow discharge. The Reynold number, runoff shear stress, and stream power of UA and GB increased as logarithmic or power functions of time, but the Froude number decreased logarithmically over time. The flow of UA and GB was supercritical and subcritical, respectively, and transformed to turbulent with inflow discharge increased. The Reynold number, shear stress and stream power decreased by 56.0 %, 63.8 % and 55.9 %, respectively, but the Froude number increased by 7.9 % when flow dropped from UA to GB. The accumulated runoff energy consumption of UA, GH and GB positions linearly increased with time, and their proportions of energy consumption are 18.3 %, 77.7 % and 4.0 %, respectively. The soil loss rate of the UA-GH-GB system initially rose and then gradually declined and levelled off. The soil loss of UA and GH decreased logarithmically over time, whereas the GB was mainly characterized by sediment deposition. The proportion of soil loss at UA and GH are 11.5 % and 88.5 %, respectively, of which the proportion of deposited sediment on GB reached 3.8 %. The change in soil loss of UA, GH and GB was significantly affected by flow hydraulic and jet properties. The critical energy consumption initiating soil erosion of UA, GH, and GB are 1.62 J s−1, 5.79 J s−1 and 1.64 J s−1, respectively. These results are helpful to reveal the mechanism of gully headcut erosion and built headcut migration model.

Mingming Guo et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 02 Dec 2020)
Status: open (until 02 Dec 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Mingming Guo et al.

Mingming Guo et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 194 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
161 28 5 194 3 2
  • HTML: 161
  • PDF: 28
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 194
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 175 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 175 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 26 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Gully headcut erosion is always a difficult issue in soil erosion field, which hinders the revelation of gully erosion mechanism and establishment of gully erosion model. Our study clarified the spatial-temporal changes in flow properties, energy consumption and soil loss, and confirmed that gully head consumed the most of flow energy (78 %) and can contribute 89 % of total soil loss. The critical energy consumption initiating soil erosion of upstream area, gully head and gully bed are determined.
Gully headcut erosion is always a difficult issue in soil erosion field, which hinders the...
Citation