Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
5.460
CiteScore value: 7.8
CiteScore
7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
SNIP1.623
IPP value: 4.91
IPP4.91
SJR value: 2.092
SJR2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
index
123
h5-index value: 65
h5-index65
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-34
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-34
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  04 Feb 2019

04 Feb 2019

Review status
This preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A final paper is not foreseen.

The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department Forest Ecology and Management, S-90183 Umeå, Sweden

Abstract. Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from a high resolution digital elevation model. Selecting the correct stream initiation threshold is key, but how do you do that on a national scale across physiographic regions? Here the Swedish landscape is used as a test bench to investigate how the mapping of small stream channels (< 6 m width) can be improved. The best modelled stream channel network was generated by pre-processing the DEM, calculating the accumulated flow, extracting a stream network using a stream initiation threshold of 2 ha. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for the 2 ha stream channel network was 0.463 while the best available maps of today, the Swedish property map (1 : 12 500) had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis of the 2 ha network show that there is additional improvements to be made by adapting the model to local conditions, as 15 % of the over and underestimation could be explained by the variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location. The most accurate stream channel network had a length 4.5 times longer the currently mapped stream network, demonstrating how important accurate stream networks is for upscaling aquatic and climate research.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Viewed

Total article views: 1,116 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
935 168 13 1,116 20 22
  • HTML: 935
  • PDF: 168
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 1,116
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 22
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 774 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 760 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 28 Sep 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Withdrawal notice

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from high resolution digital elevation models. Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for a modelled stream network was 0.463 while the best topographical maps of today, had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis showed that 15 % of the errors could be explained by variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location.
Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A...
Citation