Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-34
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2019-34

  04 Feb 2019

04 Feb 2019

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A final paper is not foreseen.

The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Department Forest Ecology and Management, S-90183 Umeå, Sweden

Abstract. Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from a high resolution digital elevation model. Selecting the correct stream initiation threshold is key, but how do you do that on a national scale across physiographic regions? Here the Swedish landscape is used as a test bench to investigate how the mapping of small stream channels (< 6 m width) can be improved. The best modelled stream channel network was generated by pre-processing the DEM, calculating the accumulated flow, extracting a stream network using a stream initiation threshold of 2 ha. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for the 2 ha stream channel network was 0.463 while the best available maps of today, the Swedish property map (1 : 12 500) had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis of the 2 ha network show that there is additional improvements to be made by adapting the model to local conditions, as 15 % of the over and underestimation could be explained by the variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location. The most accurate stream channel network had a length 4.5 times longer the currently mapped stream network, demonstrating how important accurate stream networks is for upscaling aquatic and climate research.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Anneli M. Ågren and William Lidberg

Viewed

Total article views: 1,222 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
994 214 14 1,222 23 26
  • HTML: 994
  • PDF: 214
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 1,222
  • BibTeX: 23
  • EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 860 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 843 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Apr 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from high resolution digital elevation models. Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for a modelled stream network was 0.463 while the best topographical maps of today, had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis showed that 15 % of the errors could be explained by variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location.