the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales
Abstract. Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from a high resolution digital elevation model. Selecting the correct stream initiation threshold is key, but how do you do that on a national scale across physiographic regions? Here the Swedish landscape is used as a test bench to investigate how the mapping of small stream channels (< 6 m width) can be improved. The best modelled stream channel network was generated by pre-processing the DEM, calculating the accumulated flow, extracting a stream network using a stream initiation threshold of 2 ha. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for the 2 ha stream channel network was 0.463 while the best available maps of today, the Swedish property map (1 : 12 500) had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis of the 2 ha network show that there is additional improvements to be made by adapting the model to local conditions, as 15 % of the over and underestimation could be explained by the variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location. The most accurate stream channel network had a length 4.5 times longer the currently mapped stream network, demonstrating how important accurate stream networks is for upscaling aquatic and climate research.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(619 KB)
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d69/48d69e772b8c277f6eb452d059ffb7306048d65f" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b4a3/1b4a3057823b7b8f88fe8bb2036bea6b46d6aa27" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Review of “The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales”', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
-
RC2: 'Review comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 May 2019
-
RC3: 'Review of manuscript hess-2019-34 by Agren & Lidgren', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 May 2019
-
EC1: 'Interruption of peer-review, check for new version', Bettina Schaefli, 20 Nov 2019
Interactive discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48d69/48d69e772b8c277f6eb452d059ffb7306048d65f" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b4a3/1b4a3057823b7b8f88fe8bb2036bea6b46d6aa27" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Review of “The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales”', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
-
RC2: 'Review comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 May 2019
-
RC3: 'Review of manuscript hess-2019-34 by Agren & Lidgren', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 May 2019
-
EC1: 'Interruption of peer-review, check for new version', Bettina Schaefli, 20 Nov 2019
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,483 | 501 | 54 | 2,038 | 72 | 65 |
- HTML: 1,483
- PDF: 501
- XML: 54
- Total: 2,038
- BibTeX: 72
- EndNote: 65
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
3 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Significant Emissions From Forest Drainage Ditches—An Unaccounted Term in Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Inventories? M. Peacock et al. 10.1029/2021JG006478
- An upscaling of methane emissions from Swedish flooded land M. Peacock et al. 10.1080/17583004.2024.2445254
- Policy change implications for forest water protection in Sweden over the last 50 years E. Hasselquist et al. 10.1007/s13280-019-01274-y