the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales
Abstract. Headwaters make up the majority of any given stream network, yet, they are poorly mapped. A solution to this is to model the stream networks from a high resolution digital elevation model. Selecting the correct stream initiation threshold is key, but how do you do that on a national scale across physiographic regions? Here the Swedish landscape is used as a test bench to investigate how the mapping of small stream channels (< 6 m width) can be improved. The best modelled stream channel network was generated by pre-processing the DEM, calculating the accumulated flow, extracting a stream network using a stream initiation threshold of 2 ha. The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) for the 2 ha stream channel network was 0.463 while the best available maps of today, the Swedish property map (1 : 12 500) had an MCC of 0.387. A residual analysis of the 2 ha network show that there is additional improvements to be made by adapting the model to local conditions, as 15 % of the over and underestimation could be explained by the variability in runoff, quaternary deposits, local topography and location. The most accurate stream channel network had a length 4.5 times longer the currently mapped stream network, demonstrating how important accurate stream networks is for upscaling aquatic and climate research.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(619 KB)
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of “The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales”', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2019
- AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
- RC2: 'Review comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 May 2019
- RC3: 'Review of manuscript hess-2019-34 by Agren & Lidgren', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 May 2019
- EC1: 'Interruption of peer-review, check for new version', Bettina Schaefli, 20 Nov 2019
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of “The importance of better mapping of stream networks using high resolution digital elevation models – upscaling from watershed scale to regional and national scales”', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Feb 2019
- AC1: 'Answer to Referee 1', William Lidberg, 26 Feb 2019
- RC2: 'Review comments', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 May 2019
- RC3: 'Review of manuscript hess-2019-34 by Agren & Lidgren', Anonymous Referee #3, 06 May 2019
- EC1: 'Interruption of peer-review, check for new version', Bettina Schaefli, 20 Nov 2019
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,453 | 492 | 52 | 1,997 | 70 | 63 |
- HTML: 1,453
- PDF: 492
- XML: 52
- Total: 1,997
- BibTeX: 70
- EndNote: 63
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1