"Can the Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica sand-fixing forest develop sustainably in a semi-arid region?" - Interactive discussionhttps://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/2019-05-18T07:43:35+02:00Copernicus Publicationshttps://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-AC4.pdfAC4: 'Reply to the constructive comments and revised edition', yiben cheng, 18 May 2019AC4: 'Reply to the constructive comments and revised edition', yiben cheng, 18 May 2019yiben cheng2019-05-18T07:43:33+02:002019-05-18T07:43:33+02:00https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-AC3.pdfAC3: 'Reply to the constructive comments and revised edition', yiben cheng, 18 May 2019AC3: 'Reply to the constructive comments and revised edition', yiben cheng, 18 May 2019yiben cheng2019-05-18T07:42:31+02:002019-05-18T07:42:31+02:00https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-AC2.pdfAC2: 'Reply to the constructive comments', yiben cheng, 02 May 2019AC2: 'Reply to the constructive comments', yiben cheng, 02 May 2019yiben cheng2019-05-02T15:25:31+02:002019-05-02T15:25:31+02:00https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-RC2.pdfRC2: 'Current manuscript lacks detailed methodology description hindering interpretation of results, and discussion is missing', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Apr 2019RC2: 'Current manuscript lacks detailed methodology description hindering interpretation of results, and discussion is missing', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Apr 2019Anonymous Referee #22019-04-26T10:59:37+02:002019-04-26T10:59:37+02:00https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-AC1.pdfAC1: 'Reply to the constructive comments', yiben cheng, 23 Apr 2019AC1: 'Reply to the constructive comments', yiben cheng, 23 Apr 2019yiben cheng2019-04-23T02:17:06+02:002019-04-23T02:17:06+02:00https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/hess-2019-110/hess-2019-110-RC1.pdfRC1: 'rejected subject based on the judgement of scientific contribution and quality', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Apr 2019RC1: 'rejected subject based on the judgement of scientific contribution and quality', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 Apr 2019Anonymous Referee #12019-04-18T04:00:53+02:002019-04-18T04:00:53+02:00