the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Large-scale ERT surveys for investigating shallow regolith properties and architecture
Abstract. Within the Critical Zone, regolith plays a key role in the fundamental hydrological function of water collection, storage, mixing and release. Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is recognized as a remarkable tool for characterizing the geometry and properties of the regolith, overcoming limitations inherent to conventional borehole-based investigations. However, ERT measurements with a high vertical resolution remain restricted to shallow depths, essentially due to the requirement of small electrode spacing increments (ESI). Under these circumstances, the use of ERT measurements for large horizontal surveys remains cumbersome and time-consuming. Here we focus on the need to optimize the ESI parameter in order to adequately characterize the subsurface fabric. We use a set of synthetic three-layered soil–saprock/saprolite–bedrock models in combination with a field dataset. We demonstrate that oversized ESI can significantly affect our perception of shallow subsurface structures by missing important layers and increasing the ill-posed inverse problem effects. More precisely, we document how a thin surficial layer can influence inverted ERT results and cause a resistivity bias, both at the surface and at deeper horizons. To overcome this limitation, we propose adding interpolated levels of surficial apparent resistivity based on a limited number of ERT profiles with small ESI. We demonstrate that our protocol significantly improves the accuracy of ERT profiles based on large ESI. Our protocol is time and cost efficient – especially in the case of large-scale ERT surveys.
- Preprint
(2156 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1744 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
AC2: 'Reply to Editor (Access review)', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
RC2: 'Review of Gourdol et al HESS 2019 paper', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Apr 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Gourdol Laurent, 04 Jun 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Gourdol Laurent, 04 Jun 2019
-
RC1: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
AC1: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #1', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
AC2: 'Reply to Editor (Access review)', Gourdol Laurent, 06 Feb 2019
-
RC2: 'Review of Gourdol et al HESS 2019 paper', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Apr 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Gourdol Laurent, 04 Jun 2019
-
AC3: 'Reply to Anonymous Referee #2', Gourdol Laurent, 04 Jun 2019
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,971 | 622 | 101 | 3,694 | 285 | 141 | 156 |
- HTML: 2,971
- PDF: 622
- XML: 101
- Total: 3,694
- Supplement: 285
- BibTeX: 141
- EndNote: 156
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1