Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-153
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-153
11 Apr 2018
 | 11 Apr 2018
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Trends in evapotranspiration and its drivers in Great Britain: 1961 to 2015

Eleanor M. Blyth, Alberto Martinez-de la Torre, and Emma L. Robinson

Abstract. In a warming climate, the water budget of the land is subject to varying forces such as increasing evaporative demand, mainly through the increased temperature, and changes to the precipitation, which might go up or down.

Using a verified, physically based model with 55 years of observation-based meteorological forcing, an analysis of the water budget demonstrates that Great Britain is getting warmer and wetter.

Increases in precipitation (3.0 ± 2.0 mm yr−1 yr−1) and air temperature (0.20 ± 0.13 K decade−1) are driving increases in river flow (2.16 mm yr−1 yr−1) and evapotranspiration (0.87 mm yr−1 yr−1), with no significant trend in the soil moisture.

The change in evapotranspiration is roughly constant across the regions whereas runoff varies greatly between regions: the biggest change is seen in Scotland (4.56 mm yr−1 yr−1), where precipitation increases were also the greatest (5.4 ± 3.0 mm yr−1 yr−1) and smallest trend (0.29 mm yr−1 yr−1) is seen in the English Lowlands (East Anglia and Midlands), where the increase in rainfall is not statistically significant (1.1 ± 0.7 mm yr−1 yr−1).

Relative to their contribution to the evapotranspiration budget, the increase in interception is higher than the other components. This is due to the fact that it correlates strongly with precipitation which is seeing a greater increase than the potential evapotranspiration. This leads to a higher increase in actual evapotranspiration that the potential evapotranspiration, and a negligible increase in soil moisture or groundwater store.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Eleanor M. Blyth, Alberto Martinez-de la Torre, and Emma L. Robinson
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Eleanor M. Blyth, Alberto Martinez-de la Torre, and Emma L. Robinson
Eleanor M. Blyth, Alberto Martinez-de la Torre, and Emma L. Robinson

Viewed

Total article views: 2,381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,759 564 58 2,381 77 77
  • HTML: 1,759
  • PDF: 564
  • XML: 58
  • Total: 2,381
  • BibTeX: 77
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,030 with geography defined and 26 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
In a warming climate, the water budget of the land is subject to varying forces such as increasing evaporative demand, mainly through the increased temperature, and changes to the precipitation, which might go up or down. Using a verified, physically based model over with 55 years, an analysis of the water budget demonstrates that Great Britain is getting warmer and wetter. We demonstrated that amount of water captured on the trees has an impact on the overall trend.