Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-595
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-595
 
25 Oct 2017
25 Oct 2017
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Revisiting Kelvin Helmholtz Instabilities and von Kármán Vortices in Canopy Turbulence

Tirtha Banerjee1,2, Frederik De Roo2, and Rodman Linn1 Tirtha Banerjee et al.
  • 1(Current) Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 2Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

Abstract. Studying turbulence in vegetation canopies is important in the context of a number of micrometeorological and hydrological applications. While recent focus has shifted more towards exploring different kinds of canopy heterogeneities, there are still gaps in the existing knowledge on the multiple types of dynamics involved in the case of horizontally homogeneous canopies. For example, experimental studies have indicated that turbulence in the canopy sublayer (CSL) can be divided into three regimes. In the deep-zone, the flow-field is dominated by von Kármán vortex streets and interrupted by strong sweep events. The second zone near the canopy top is dominated by attached eddies and Kelvin-Helmholtz waves associated with the velocity inflection point in the mean longitudinal velocity profile. Above the canopy, the flow resembles classical boundary layer flow. In this study, these different kinds of dynamics are studied together by means of a large eddy simulation (LES). The main theme of this work is to address the question whether the parametrization of the canopy by a distributed drag force in numerical simulations instead of placing real solid obstacles is consistent with the three layer conceptual model. Unique techniques such as measures from information theory and coupled oscillator analysis are used to extract the coherent structures associated with the two motions. It can be stated that a better understanding of the rich dynamics associated with the simplest case of canopy turbulence can lead to more efficient simulations and more importantly improve the interpretation of more complex scenarios.

Tirtha Banerjee et al.

 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Tirtha Banerjee et al.

Tirtha Banerjee et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,220 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
822 356 42 1,220 57 63
  • HTML: 822
  • PDF: 356
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 1,220
  • BibTeX: 57
  • EndNote: 63
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Oct 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Oct 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,163 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,156 with geography defined and 7 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Sep 2022
Download
Short summary
The conceptual model of turbulent flow through vegetation canopies is a phenomenological one that is developed from experimental observations. However, standard numerical simulations of canopy turbulence usually don't resolve the canopy as solid obstructions. We seek to reconcile such numerical simulations with the observations using large eddy simulations and information theory. We find out that the traditional drag based representation contains signatures of the phenomenological model.