the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin
Abstract. A distributed model (TETIS), a semi-distributed model (TOPMODEL) and a lumped model (HEC HMS soil moisture accounting) were used to simulate the discharge response of a tropical high mountain basin characterized by soils with high water storage capacity and high conductivity. The models were calibrated with the Shuffle Complex Evolution algorithm, using the Kling and Gupta efficiency as objective function. Performance analysis and diagnostics were carried out using the signatures of the flow duration curve and through analysis of the model fluxes in order to identify the most appropriate model for the study area for flood early warning. The impact of varying grid sizes was assessed in the TETIS model and the TOPMODEL in order to chose a model with balanced model performance and computational efficiency. The sensitivity of the models to variation in the precipitation input was analysed by forcing the models with a rainfall ensemble obtained from Gaussian simulation. The resulting discharge ensembles of each model were compared in order to identify differences among models structures. The results show that TOPMODEL is the most realistic model of the three tested, albeit showing the largest discharge ensemble spread. The main differences among models occur between HEC HMS soil moisture accounting and TETIS, and HEC HMS soil moisture accounting and TOPMODEL, with HEC HMS soil moisture accounting producing ensembles in a range lower than the other two models. The ensembles of TETIS and TOPMODEL are more similar.
- Preprint
(2905 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Comments on "Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin"', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2016
- AC1: 'Reply to comments Referee # 1', Carolina Rogelis, 20 Jul 2016
-
RC2: 'Review of "Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin"', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2016
- AC2: 'Response to comments Referee 2', Carolina Rogelis, 20 Jul 2016
-
RC1: 'Comments on "Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin"', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2016
- AC1: 'Reply to comments Referee # 1', Carolina Rogelis, 20 Jul 2016
-
RC2: 'Review of "Hydrological model assessment for flood early warning in a tropical high mountain basin"', Anonymous Referee #2, 31 Mar 2016
- AC2: 'Response to comments Referee 2', Carolina Rogelis, 20 Jul 2016
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,131 | 989 | 95 | 2,215 | 126 | 142 |
- HTML: 1,131
- PDF: 989
- XML: 95
- Total: 2,215
- BibTeX: 126
- EndNote: 142
Cited
12 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Local, Daily, and Total Bio-Optical Models of Coastal Waters of Manfredonia Gulf Applied to Simulated Data of CHRIS, Landsat TM, MIVIS, MODIS, and PRISMA Sensors for Evaluating the Error R. Cavalli 10.3390/rs12091428
- Numerical Approach for Channel Flood Routing in an Ungauged Basin: a Case Study in Kulsi River Basin, India B. Bharali & U. Misra 10.1007/s41101-022-00149-w
- Climatic drought impacts on key ecosystem services of a low mountain region in Germany A. Al-Qubati et al. 10.1007/s10661-023-11397-1
- Water-Quality Data Imputation with a High Percentage of Missing Values: A Machine Learning Approach R. Rodríguez et al. 10.3390/su13116318
- A signal-processing-based interpretation of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency L. Duc & Y. Sawada 10.5194/hess-27-1827-2023
- Development and testing of a rainfall-runoff model for flood simulation in dry mountain catchments: A case study for the Dez River Basin A. Samadi et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2018.07.003
- Insights Into the Aerodynamic Versus Radiometric Surface Temperature Debate in Thermal‐Based Evaporation Modeling K. Mallick et al. 10.1029/2021GL097568
- A Generalized Multistep Dynamic (GMD) TOPMODEL S. Goudarzi et al. 10.1029/2022WR032198
- Evaluation of Historical Simulations of CMIP6 Models for Temperature and Precipitation in Guatemala P. Rivera 10.1007/s41748-022-00333-x
- Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores W. Knoben et al. 10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019
- Parsimonious Modeling of Snow Accumulation and Snowmelt Processes in High Mountain Basins I. Orozco et al. 10.3390/w11061288
- A Signature‐Based Hydrologic Efficiency Metric for Model Calibration and Evaluation in Gauged and Ungauged Catchments M. Kiraz et al. 10.1029/2023WR035321