Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-2555-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-2555-2014
03 Mar 2014
 | 03 Mar 2014
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Hydrological model parameter dimensionality is a weak measure of prediction uncertainty

S. Pande, L. Arkesteijn, H. H. G. Savenije, and L. A. Bastidas

Abstract. This paper presents evidence that model prediction uncertainty does not necessarily rise with parameter dimensionality (the number of parameters). Here by prediction we mean future simulation of a variable of interest conditioned on certain future values of input variables. We utilize a relationship between prediction uncertainty, sample size and model complexity based on Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) generalization theory. It suggests that models with higher complexity tend to have higher prediction uncertainty for limited sample size. However, model complexity is not necessarily related to the number of parameters. Here by limited sample size we mean a sample size that is limited in representing the dynamics of the underlying processes. Based on VC theory, we demonstrate that model complexity crucially depends on the magnitude of model parameters. We do this by using two model structures, SAC-SMA and its simplification, SIXPAR, and 5 MOPEX basin data sets across the United States. We conclude that parsimonious model selection based on parameter dimensionality may lead to a less informed model choice.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. Pande, L. Arkesteijn, H. H. G. Savenije, and L. A. Bastidas
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. Pande, L. Arkesteijn, H. H. G. Savenije, and L. A. Bastidas
S. Pande, L. Arkesteijn, H. H. G. Savenije, and L. A. Bastidas

Viewed

Total article views: 1,783 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,148 554 81 1,783 109 119
  • HTML: 1,148
  • PDF: 554
  • XML: 81
  • Total: 1,783
  • BibTeX: 109
  • EndNote: 119
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Mar 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024