Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-83-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-83-2014
06 Jan 2014
 | 06 Jan 2014
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Is the groundwater reservoir linear? A mathematical analysis of two limiting cases

G. H. de Rooij

Abstract. Storage–discharge relationships of the groundwater reservoirs of several catchments in a temperate-humid climate were reported in the literature to be seemingly non-linear. Once recharge was adequately accounted for during model calibration they turned out to be linear. The question was posed if this linearity was a fundamental property of groundwater reservoirs in general. A mathematical analysis based on analytical solutions for several cases involving parallel flow in horizontal aquifers shows that this is not the case when the surface water level is close to the aquifer bottom. When the aquifer is of constant thickness, linear-reservoir behaviour arises when the forcings remain constant for a sufficiently long time. This can range from a few weeks for aquifers with a dense drainage network of streams or ditches to years or centuries for large aquifers drained by rivers many kilometers apart. The characteristic time of the groundwater reservoir depends on whether or not the aquifer is leaky and recharge is non-zero. It is concluded that groundwater reservoirs can only be linear if their thickness can be assumed independent of the hydraulic head, and if they have a dense drainage network. Even then, they behave non-linearly up to several weeks after a change in recharge. Models that conceptualize the catchment as a configuration of coupled reservoirs will normally assign the groundwater discharge surplus generated because of the initially non-linear behaviour of the groundwater to their fast-responding reservoirs, thereby exaggerating the importance of fast-responding flow routes in a catchment.

G. H. de Rooij
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
G. H. de Rooij
G. H. de Rooij

Viewed

Total article views: 1,627 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,030 525 72 1,627 88 99
  • HTML: 1,030
  • PDF: 525
  • XML: 72
  • Total: 1,627
  • BibTeX: 88
  • EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Jan 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024