Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-11093-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-11093-2013
22 Aug 2013
 | 22 Aug 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Evaluation of the JULES land surface model in simulating catchment hydrology in Southern Africa

N. C. MacKellar, S. J. Dadson, M. New, and P. Wolski

Abstract. Land surface models (LSMs) are advanced tools which can be used to estimate energy, water and biogeochemical exchanges at regional scales. The inclusion of a river flow routing module in an LSM allows for the simulation of river discharge from a catchment and offers an approach to evaluate the response of the system to variations in climate and land-use, which can provide useful information for regional water resource management. This study offers insight into some of the pragmatic considerations of applying an LSM over a regional domain in Southern Africa. The objectives are to identify key parameter sensitivities and investigate differences between two runoff production schemes in physically contrasted catchments. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) LSM was configured for a domain covering Southern Africa at a 0.5° resolution. The model was forced with meteorological input from the WATCH Forcing Data for the period 1981–2001 and sensitivity to various model configurations and parameter settings were tested. Both the PDM and TOPMODEL sub-grid scale runoff generation schemes were tested for parameter sensitivities, with the evaluation focussing on simulated river discharge in sub-catchments of the Orange, Okavango and Zambezi rivers. It was found that three catchments respond differently to the model configurations and there is no single runoff parameterization scheme or parameter values that yield optimal results across all catchments. The PDM scheme performs well in the upper Orange catchment, but poorly in the Okavango and Zambezi, whereas TOPMODEL grossly underestimates discharge in the upper Orange and shows marked improvement over PDM for the Okavango and Zambezi. A major shortcoming of PDM is that it does not realistically represent subsurface runoff in the deep, porous soils typical of the Okavango and Zambezi headwaters. The dry-season discharge in these catchments is therefore not replicated by PDM. TOPMODEL, however, simulates a more realistic seasonal cycle of subsurface runoff and hence improved dry-season flow.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
N. C. MacKellar, S. J. Dadson, M. New, and P. Wolski
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
N. C. MacKellar, S. J. Dadson, M. New, and P. Wolski
N. C. MacKellar, S. J. Dadson, M. New, and P. Wolski

Viewed

Total article views: 2,083 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,154 847 82 2,083 101 115
  • HTML: 1,154
  • PDF: 847
  • XML: 82
  • Total: 2,083
  • BibTeX: 101
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024