Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-6847-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-10-6847-2013
03 Jun 2013
 | 03 Jun 2013
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Estimating monthly rainfall in rural river basins under climate change: an improved bias-correcting statistical downscaling approach

D. L. Jayasekera and J. J. Kaluarachchi

Abstract. This study extended the work of Kim et al. (2008) to generate future rainfall under climate change using a discrete-time/space Markov chain based on historical conditional probabilities. A bias-correction method is proposed by fitting suitable statistical distributions to transform rainfall from the general circulation model (GCM) scale to watershed scale. The demonstration example used the Nam Ngum River Basin (NNRB) in Laos which is a rural river basin with high potential for hydropower generation and significant rain-fed agriculture supporting rural livelihoods. This work generated weekly rainfall for a 100 yr period using historical rainfall data from 1961 to 2000 for ten selected weather stations. The bias-correction method showed the ability to reduce bias of the mean values of GCMs when compared to the observed mean amount at each station. The simulated rainfall series is perturbed using the delta change estimated at each station to project future rainfall for the Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A2. GCMs consisting of third generation coupled general circulation model (CGCM3.1 T63) and European center Hamburg model (ECHAM5) projected an increasing trend of mean annual rainfall in the NNRB. Seasonal rainfall percent changes showed an increase in the wet and dry seasons with the highest increase in the dry season mean rainfall of about 31% from 2051 to 2090. While the GCM projections showed good results with appropriate bias corrections, the Providing REgional Climates for Impacts Studies (PRECIS) regional climate model significantly underestimated historical behavior and produced higher mean absolute errors compared to the corresponding GCM predictions.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
D. L. Jayasekera and J. J. Kaluarachchi

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
D. L. Jayasekera and J. J. Kaluarachchi
D. L. Jayasekera and J. J. Kaluarachchi

Viewed

Total article views: 2,004 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
860 1,064 80 2,004 78 87
  • HTML: 860
  • PDF: 1,064
  • XML: 80
  • Total: 2,004
  • BibTeX: 78
  • EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.