Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-8941-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-8941-2012
27 Jul 2012
 | 27 Jul 2012
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Streamflow allocation in arid watersheds: a case study in Northwestern China

C. He, L. Zhang, L. Fu, Y. Luo, L. Li, and C. DeMarchi

Abstract. This paper proposes a framework for allocating water resources among the upper, middle, and lower reaches of arid watersheds to meet the multiple demands for water, including rehabilitation of downstream ecosystem. The framework includes: (1) hydrologic simulation of distribution of water resources in the study watershed; (2) development of water allocation criteria; and (3) implementation of the water allocation plan. The advantages of the proposed framework are: (1) spatial integration; (2) multiple objectives; (3) incorporation of local needs through participatory decision making; and (4) dynamic evaluation.

The framework was applied to the Heihe watershed, a large inland (terminal lake) watershed with a drainage area of over 128 000 km2 in Northwestern China. Simulation of the daily river flows for the period of 1990–2000 by the Distributed Large Basin Runoff Model shows that Qilian Mountain in the upper reach produced most of the runoff in the watershed, and the increased withdrawals of water for agricultural irrigation, industrial development, and municipal supplies at the middles reach oasis reduced the annual mean discharge by approximately 0.18 × 109 m3 over the simulation period, making the middle reach unable to deliver the mandated amount of 0.95 × 109 m3 water downstream by the State Council, under normal climatic conditions. Changes in land use practices need to be implemented to achieve the mandated water allocation plan. The paper suggests that a participatory watershed planning approach involving multiple stakeholders in the water allocation process be undertaken to address key questions regularly, including how much water should be allocated to what uses and for whom and at what price?

C. He, L. Zhang, L. Fu, Y. Luo, L. Li, and C. DeMarchi
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. He, L. Zhang, L. Fu, Y. Luo, L. Li, and C. DeMarchi
C. He, L. Zhang, L. Fu, Y. Luo, L. Li, and C. DeMarchi

Viewed

Total article views: 1,513 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
888 547 78 1,513 91 90
  • HTML: 888
  • PDF: 547
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 1,513
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 90
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 27 Apr 2024