Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-6409-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-6409-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.
Which type of slope gradient should be used to determine flow-partition proportion in multiple-flow-direction algorithms – tangent or sine?
Abstract. This paper revisits the tangent expression for the slope gradient (tan β) used in the general flow-partition function in multiple-flow-direction (MFD) algorithms. The deduction of the flow-partition function performed here based on hydrological theory shows that sin β, instead of tan β as used currently, provides a clear theoretical basis for determining the flow-partition proportions in MFD algorithms.
How to cite. Zhan, L.-J., Qin, C.-Z., and Zhu, A.-X.: Which type of slope gradient should be used to determine flow-partition proportion in multiple-flow-direction algorithms – tangent or sine?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 9, 6409–6418, https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-6409-2012, 2012.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Download & links
Download & links
- Preprint
(600 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
- RC C3083: 'Review of the paper hess-2012-176', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jul 2012
-
RC C3779: 'Review of the paper hess-2012-176', Paolo Tarolli, 14 Aug 2012
- AC C3906: 'Reply to Dr. Paolo Tarolli', Cheng-Zhi Qin, 20 Aug 2012
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
- RC C3083: 'Review of the paper hess-2012-176', Anonymous Referee #1, 17 Jul 2012
-
RC C3779: 'Review of the paper hess-2012-176', Paolo Tarolli, 14 Aug 2012
- AC C3906: 'Reply to Dr. Paolo Tarolli', Cheng-Zhi Qin, 20 Aug 2012
Viewed
Total article views: 1,751 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,201 | 485 | 65 | 1,751 | 101 | 97 |
- HTML: 1,201
- PDF: 485
- XML: 65
- Total: 1,751
- BibTeX: 101
- EndNote: 97
Cited
Saved
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
L.-J. Zhan
State Key Laboratory of Resources & Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
C.-Z. Qin
State Key Laboratory of Resources & Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
A.-X. Zhu
State Key Laboratory of Resources & Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1491, USA