Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-4753-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-4753-2011
13 May 2011
 | 13 May 2011
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Calculating the average natural recharge in large areas as a factor of their lithology and precipitation

E. Sanz, I. Menéndez Pidal de Navascués, and C. Távara

Abstract. In an area as large as Spain, it is shown by statistical inference on a sample of 875 springs (with discharges greater than 10 l s−1), whose average flow, lithology and catchment areas are known, and which were grouped into regions of contrasting rainfall, that the average annual recharge is a fixed fraction of annual rainfall for each lithology. Recharge rates have thus been established with respect to rainfall for six lithological groups of different permeability: sands, gravels and generally alluvial formations 8.3%; conglomerates, 5.6%; sandstones, 7.3%; limestone and dolomite 34.3%; marls, marly limestones, silts and clays, 3.3%; and hard rocks, 1.3%. Since Spain can be considered to be representative, given its large size and a highly varied lithology, topography and rainfall, these recharge rates with respect to rainfall are probably quasi-universal values, which can be used to estimate the average recharge or average groundwater resources of large regions in any part of the world (except in special cases such as areas that have permafrost). In any case, the recharge rates can be adapted for each region according to its particular characteristics. Rainfall and lithology data are abundant, and so the method can be widely used to calculate hydraulic balances. The method has been applied to the Duero basin in Spain and to other European countries (Portugal, Ireland and Italy), obtaining recharge results that are very similar to those calculated by other methods.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
E. Sanz, I. Menéndez Pidal de Navascués, and C. Távara
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
E. Sanz, I. Menéndez Pidal de Navascués, and C. Távara
E. Sanz, I. Menéndez Pidal de Navascués, and C. Távara

Viewed

Total article views: 1,384 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
731 580 73 1,384 98 100
  • HTML: 731
  • PDF: 580
  • XML: 73
  • Total: 1,384
  • BibTeX: 98
  • EndNote: 100
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024