Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-1141-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-1141-2012
20 Jan 2012
 | 20 Jan 2012
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Improving the accuracy of the AFWA-NASA (ANSA) blended snow-cover product over the Lower Great Lakes region

D. K. Hall, J. L. Foster, S. Kumar, J. Y. L. Chien, and G. A. Riggs

Abstract. The Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) – NASA blended snow-cover product, called ANSA, utilizes Earth Observing System standard snow products from the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSR-E) to map daily snow cover and snow-water equivalent (SWE) globally. We have compared ANSA-derived SWE with SWE values calculated from snow depths reported at ~1500 National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) co-op stations in the Lower Great Lakes Basin. Compared to station data, the ANSA significantly underestimates SWE in densely-forested areas. We use two methods to remove some of the bias observed in forested areas to reduce the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the ANSA- and station-derived SWE. First, we calculated a 5-yr mean ANSA-derived SWE for the winters of 2005–2006 through 2009–2010, and developed a 5-yr mean bias-corrected SWE map for each month. For most of the months studied during the 5-yr period, the 5-yr bias correction improved the agreement between the ANSA-derived and station-derived SWE. However, anomalous months such as when there was very little snow on the ground compared to the 5-yr mean, or months in which the snow was much greater than the 5-yr mean, showed poorer results (as expected). We also used a 7-day running mean (7DRM) bias correction method using days just prior to the day in question to correct the ANSA data. This method was more effective in reducing the RMSE between the ANSA- and co-op-derived SWE values, and in capturing the effects of anomalous snow conditions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
D. K. Hall, J. L. Foster, S. Kumar, J. Y. L. Chien, and G. A. Riggs
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
D. K. Hall, J. L. Foster, S. Kumar, J. Y. L. Chien, and G. A. Riggs
D. K. Hall, J. L. Foster, S. Kumar, J. Y. L. Chien, and G. A. Riggs

Viewed

Total article views: 1,336 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
811 447 78 1,336 105 90
  • HTML: 811
  • PDF: 447
  • XML: 78
  • Total: 1,336
  • BibTeX: 105
  • EndNote: 90
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024