Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-5051-2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-8-5051-2011
23 May 2011
 | 23 May 2011
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Hydrological impact of rainwater harvesting in the Modder river basin of central South Africa

W. A. Welderufael, Y. E. Woyessa, and D. C. Edossa

Abstract. Along the path of water flowing in a river basin are many water-related human interventions that modify the natural systems. Rainwater harvesting is one such intervention that involves harnessing of water in the upstream catchment. Increased water usage at upstream level is an issue of concern for downstream water availability to sustain ecosystem services. The upstream Modder River basin, located in a semi arid region in the central South Africa, is experiencing intermittent meteorological droughts causing water shortages for agriculture, livestock and domestic purpose. To address this problem a technique was developed for small scale farmers with the objective of harnessing rainwater for crop production. However, the hydrological impact of a wider adoption of this technique by farmers has not been well quantified. In this regard, the SWAT hydrological model was used to simulate the hydrological impact of such practices. The scenarios studied were: (1) Baseline scenario, based on the actual land use of 2000, which is dominated by pasture (combination of natural and some improved grass lands) (PAST); (2) Partial conversion of Land use 2000 (PAST) to conventional agriculture (Agri-CON); and (3) Partial conversion of Land use 2000 (PAST) to in-field rainwater harvesting which was aimed at improving the precipitation use efficiency (Agri-IRWH).

SWAT was calibrated using observed daily mean stream flow data of a sub-catchment (419 km2) in the study area. SWAT performed well in simulating the stream flow giving Nash and Sutcliffe (1970) efficiency index of 0.57 for the monthly stream flow calibration. The simulated water balance results showed that the highest peak mean monthly direct flow was obtained on Agri-CON land use (18 mm), followed by PAST (12 mm) and Agri-IRWH land use (9 mm). These were 19 %, 13 % and 11 % of the mean annual rainfall, respectively. The Agri-IRWH scenario reduced direct flow by 38 % compared to Agri-CON. On the other hand it was found that the Agri-IRWH contributed to more groundwater flow (40 mm) compared to PAST (32 mm) and Agri-CON (19 mm) scenarios. These results are in line with the intended purpose of Agri-IRWH. Although there was a visible impact of the rainwater harvesting technique on the water yield when considered on a monthly time frame, the overall result suggests that the water yield of one of the upper Modder River Basin quaternary catchment may not be adversely affected by the Agri-IRWH land use scenario despite its surface runoff abstraction design.

W. A. Welderufael, Y. E. Woyessa, and D. C. Edossa
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
W. A. Welderufael, Y. E. Woyessa, and D. C. Edossa
W. A. Welderufael, Y. E. Woyessa, and D. C. Edossa

Viewed

Total article views: 2,491 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,583 825 83 2,491 89 89
  • HTML: 1,583
  • PDF: 825
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 2,491
  • BibTeX: 89
  • EndNote: 89
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 27 Apr 2024