Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-7-7809-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-7-7809-2010
08 Oct 2010
 | 08 Oct 2010
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Groundwater contribution to river flows – using hydrograph separation, hydrological and hydrogeological models in a southern Quebec aquifer

M. Larocque, V. Fortin, M. C. Pharand, and C. Rivard

Abstract. Groundwater contribution to river flows, generally called base flows, often accounts for a significant proportion of total flow rate, especially during the dry season. The objective of this work is to test simple approaches requiring limited data to understand groundwater contribution to river flows. The Noire river basin in southern Quebec is used as a case study. A lumped conceptual hydrological model (the MOHYSE model), a groundwater flow model (MODFLOW) and hydrograph separation are used to provide estimates of base flow for the study area. Results show that the methods are complementary. Hydrograph separation and the MOHYSE surface flow model provide similar annual estimates for the groundwater contribution to river flow, but monthly base flows can vary significantly between the two methods. Both methods have the advantage of being easily implemented. However, the distinction between aquifer contribution and shallow subsurface contribution to base flow can only be made with a groundwater flow model. The aquifer renewal rate estimated with the MODFLOW model for the Noire River is 30% of the recharge estimated from base flow values. This is a significantly difference which can be crucial for regional-scale water management.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Larocque, V. Fortin, M. C. Pharand, and C. Rivard

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Larocque, V. Fortin, M. C. Pharand, and C. Rivard
M. Larocque, V. Fortin, M. C. Pharand, and C. Rivard

Viewed

Total article views: 1,821 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,166 568 87 1,821 70 72
  • HTML: 1,166
  • PDF: 568
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 1,821
  • BibTeX: 70
  • EndNote: 72
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.