Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-7-2121-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-7-2121-2010
26 Mar 2010
 | 26 Mar 2010
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Multiobjective calibration of the MESH hydrological model on the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed

A. J. MacLean, B. A. Tolson, F. R. Seglenieks, and E. Soulis

Abstract. The spatially distributed MESH hydrologic model (Pietroniro et al., 2007) was successfully calibrated and then validated for the prediction of snow water equivalent (SWE) and streamflow in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed in Idaho, USA. The tradeoff between fitting to SWE versus streamflow data was assessed and showed that both could be simultaneously predicted with good quality by the MESH model. Not surprisingly, calibrating to only one objective (e.g. SWE) yielded poor simulation results for the other objective (e.g. streamflow). The multiobjective calibration problem in this study was efficiently solved via a simple weighted objective function approach and analyses showed that the approach yielded a balanced solution between the objectives. Our approach therefore eliminated the need to rely on a potentially more computationally intensive evolutionary multiobjective algorithm to approximate the entire tradeoff surface between objectives. Additional calibration experiments showed that for our calibration computational budget (2000 model evaluations), the autocalibration procedure would fail without being initialized to a model parameter set carefully determined for this specific case study. This study serves as a benchmark for MESH model simulation accuracy which can be compared with future versions of MESH.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
A. J. MacLean, B. A. Tolson, F. R. Seglenieks, and E. Soulis

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. J. MacLean, B. A. Tolson, F. R. Seglenieks, and E. Soulis
A. J. MacLean, B. A. Tolson, F. R. Seglenieks, and E. Soulis

Viewed

Total article views: 1,385 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
833 487 65 1,385 79 85
  • HTML: 833
  • PDF: 487
  • XML: 65
  • Total: 1,385
  • BibTeX: 79
  • EndNote: 85
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.