the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Multiobjective calibration of the MESH hydrological model on the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed
Abstract. The spatially distributed MESH hydrologic model (Pietroniro et al., 2007) was successfully calibrated and then validated for the prediction of snow water equivalent (SWE) and streamflow in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed in Idaho, USA. The tradeoff between fitting to SWE versus streamflow data was assessed and showed that both could be simultaneously predicted with good quality by the MESH model. Not surprisingly, calibrating to only one objective (e.g. SWE) yielded poor simulation results for the other objective (e.g. streamflow). The multiobjective calibration problem in this study was efficiently solved via a simple weighted objective function approach and analyses showed that the approach yielded a balanced solution between the objectives. Our approach therefore eliminated the need to rely on a potentially more computationally intensive evolutionary multiobjective algorithm to approximate the entire tradeoff surface between objectives. Additional calibration experiments showed that for our calibration computational budget (2000 model evaluations), the autocalibration procedure would fail without being initialized to a model parameter set carefully determined for this specific case study. This study serves as a benchmark for MESH model simulation accuracy which can be compared with future versions of MESH.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(694 KB)
Interactive discussion
-
RC C862: 'review', Juraj Parajka, 13 May 2010
- AC C1449: 'Response 1', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
-
RC C891: 'reviewed_hessd-7-2121-2010', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 May 2010
- AC C1452: 'response 2', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
-
RC C1283: 'Review', Erwin Zehe, 01 Jul 2010
- AC C1455: 'Response 3', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
Interactive discussion
-
RC C862: 'review', Juraj Parajka, 13 May 2010
- AC C1449: 'Response 1', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
-
RC C891: 'reviewed_hessd-7-2121-2010', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 May 2010
- AC C1452: 'response 2', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
-
RC C1283: 'Review', Erwin Zehe, 01 Jul 2010
- AC C1455: 'Response 3', Bryan Tolson, 15 Jul 2010
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
833 | 487 | 65 | 1,385 | 79 | 85 |
- HTML: 833
- PDF: 487
- XML: 65
- Total: 1,385
- BibTeX: 79
- EndNote: 85
Cited
6 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A methodological framework for the hydrological model selection process in water resource management projects D. Ghonchepour et al. 10.1111/nrm.12326
- Testing the ability of a semidistributed hydrological model to simulate contributing area S. Mengistu & C. Spence 10.1002/2016WR018760
- Multi-criteria parameter estimation for the Unified Land Model B. Livneh & D. Lettenmaier 10.5194/hess-16-3029-2012
- Multiobjective sensitivity analysis and optimization of distributed hydrologic model MOBIDIC J. Yang et al. 10.5194/hess-18-4101-2014
- On the relationship between flood and contributing area C. Spence & S. Mengistu 10.1002/hyp.13467
- Climate and water availability indicators in Canada: Challenges and a way forward. Part I – Indicators G. Koshida et al. 10.1080/07011784.2015.1006023