Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
Comparison between radar and rain gauges data at different distances from radar and correlation existing between the rainfall values in the adjacent pixels
S. Sebastianelli,F. Russo,F. Napolitano,and L. Baldini
Abstract. Rainfall intensity data in pixels very far from radar are less correlated than values in pixels near the radar, because at far distances the width of a range-bin is comparable or bigger than the pixel width, so in a pixel there are one or just a few rainfall intensity values. Vice versa, near the radar, there are many radar resolution bins which belong to a single pixel, so great correlation between rainfall intensity values for contiguous pixels is expected. Moreover, the signal returned from precipitation at far distance from radar antenna can be due to a radar sample volume partially or completely filled with mixed phase or ice particles, or can be quite close to the minimum detectable signal. All these phenomena can influence the goodness of rainfall estimates, introducing errors which increase as the distance from radar increases. The objective of this work is to characterize these errors as a function of the distance. For this aim is possible to compare the rainfall data obtained by rain gauges at different distances from radar with rainfall radar data at the same distances, verifying the correlation existing between the rainfall values in the adjacent pixels and how the difference between radar and rain gauges data changes. The radar data utilized in this work have been collected from the CNR–ISAC (Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate of the National Research Council) Polar 55C radar in Rome Tor Vergata during 2008.
Received: 30 Jun 2010 – Discussion started: 30 Jul 2010
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.