Articles | Volume 5, issue 4
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 615–628, 2001
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-615-2001
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 615–628, 2001
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-5-615-2001

  31 Dec 2001

31 Dec 2001

Raindrop size distributions and radar reflectivity–rain rate relationships for radar hydrology

R. Uijlenhoet R. Uijlenhoet
  • Sub-department Water Resources, Department of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands;
  • also Laboratoire d’étude des Transferts en Hydrologie et EnvironnementUMR 5564, CNRS-INPG-IRD-UJF, Grenoble, France
  • Email: remko.uijlenhoet@users.whh.wau.nl

Abstract. The conversion of the radar reflectivity factor Z(mm6m-3) to rain rate R(mm h-1 ) is a crucial step in the hydrological application of weather radar measurements. It has been common practice for over 50 years now to take for this conversion a simple power law relationship between Z and R. It is the purpose of this paper to explain that the fundamental reason for the existence of such power law relationships is the fact that Z and R are related to each other via the raindrop size distribution. To this end, the concept of the raindrop size distribution is first explained. Then, it is demonstrated that there exist two fundamentally different forms of the raindrop size distribution, one corresponding to raindrops present in a volume of air and another corresponding to those arriving at a surface. It is explained how Z and R are defined in terms of both these forms. Using the classical exponential raindrop size distribution as an example, it is demonstrated (1) that the definitions of Z and R naturally lead to power law Z–R relationships, and (2) how the coefficients of such relationships are related to the parameters of the raindrop size distribution. Numerous empirical Z–R relationships are analysed to demonstrate that there exist systematic differences in the coefficients of these relationships and the corresponding parameters of the (exponential) raindrop size distribution between different types of rainfall. Finally, six consistent Z–R relationships are derived, based upon different assumptions regarding the rain rate dependence of the parameters of the (exponential) raindrop size distribution. An appendix shows that these relationships are in fact special cases of a general Z–R relationship that follows from a recently proposed scaling framework for describing raindrop size distributions and their properties.

Keywords: radar hydrology, raindrop size distribution, radar reflectivity–rain rate relationship