<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-30-6789-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Continental water storage trends and budgets from the GRACE/GRACE-FO Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P)</article-title><alt-title>Continental water storage trends and budgets</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Hohensinn</surname><given-names>Roland</given-names></name>
          <email>roland.hohensinn@gfz.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9617-2920</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Gou</surname><given-names>Junyang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-0577</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Ulrich</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3379-9213</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Jensen</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Humphrey</surname><given-names>Vincent</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2541-6382</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Dorigo</surname><given-names>Wouter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-7572</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Börgens</surname><given-names>Eva</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-9402</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Soja</surname><given-names>Benedikt</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7010-2147</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Gruber</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-7023</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff9">
          <name><surname>Eicker</surname><given-names>Annette</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-1445</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rast</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-3141</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff8">
          <name><surname>Güntner</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-8478</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>International Space Science Institute, Hallerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, ETH Zurich, Robert-Gnehm-Weg 15, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Operation Center 1, 8058 Zürich-Flughafen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, TU Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, Wien, 1040, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>University of Potsdam, Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24-25, Potsdam, 14476, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>HafenCity University Hamburg, Henning-Voscherau-Platz 1, Hamburg, 20457, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Roland Hohensinn (roland.hohensinn@gfz.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>November</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>30</volume>
      <issue>21</issue>
      <fpage>6789</fpage><lpage>6820</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Roland Hohensinn et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e244">The Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P) provides global groundwater storage (GWS) variations derived from GRACE/GRACE-FO terrestrial water storage (TWS) change by subtracting root-zone soil moisture, glacier mass change, surface water storage, and snow water equivalent. G3P thus provides the first globally consistent, publicly available groundwater dataset from satellite gravimetry for continental-scale water resources assessment. Here, we use G3P to assess global GWS trends over the extended GRACE/GRACE-FO record, jointly with TWS and the subtracted storage components.</p>

      <p id="d2e247">A central challenge is that apparent long-term trends in GRACE/GRACE-FO water storage records can reflect persistent storage change, natural climate variability, hydrological memory, and observational errors, complicating trend detection and continental-scale storage-change budgets. We address this using a calibrated trend-analysis framework that jointly accounts for trend, seasonal, and stochastic variations in each grid-cell time series. Statistically significant trends are then aggregated to quantify volumetric GWS and TWS gains, losses, and net changes at continental and global scales.</p>

      <p id="d2e250">Applying this framework to 21.5 years of data (April 2002–September 2023), we find that groundwater depletion is a major contributor to freshwater decline at continental scales, most prominently in Asia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), while cryospheric mass loss dominates the strongest TWS declines in high-latitude and glacierized regions. Pronounced regional contrasts include increasing groundwater storage across large parts of Africa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), negative trends in drought-affected regions, and widespread negative or near-threshold GWS tendencies across the Northern Hemisphere. Globally, significance-filtered net GWS and TWS changes are approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The corresponding gross negative GWS change of approximately 103 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is of the same order as model-based estimates of global groundwater depletion. Sensitivity tests indicate robust results: at 95 %, detected area increases by 30 % for TWS and 36 % for GWS, while net-loss magnitudes rise by only 9 % and 18 %. Across much of the seasonal-to-interannual spectral range, GWS is the dominant individual storage-component signal within TWS, which highlights the importance of groundwater for continental freshwater availability.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>1.1</label><title>Water storage: an Essential Climate Variable observed by satellite gravimetry</title>
      <p id="d2e383">Quantifying trends in terrestrial water storage (TWS) is central for assessing changes in global freshwater availability and its coupling to the climate system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120 bib1.bibx115" id="paren.1"/>. TWS integrates changes in groundwater storage (GWS), soil moisture, surface water, snow water equivalent, and glaciers. To reflect their importance, TWS and GWS have been endorsed as Essential Climate Variables by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx150" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e392">Since 2002, the GRACE (2002–2017) and GRACE Follow-On (since 2018) missions provide global observations of time-variable mass change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx138 bib1.bibx87" id="paren.3"/>, yielding an almost continuous over-two-decade record that substantially improves trend detectability compared to earlier GRACE-only studies. Within the Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P), consistent global GWS estimates (v1.12) are derived from GRACE/GRACE-FO TWS by subtracting contributions of other storage compartments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.4"/>. GRACE/GRACE-FO observations capture the combined effects of climate variability, cryospheric mass loss, and anthropogenic water use, including groundwater extraction for irrigation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. For global trend assessment, GRACE/GRACE-FO observations are particularly valuable because hydrological and land-surface models can exhibit divergent trend signs and magnitudes, which complicates trend inference (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126" id="altparen.6"/> or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="altparen.7"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>1.2</label><title>Observed global and continental-scale patterns in TWS and GWS</title>
      <p id="d2e420">GRACE-based assessments indicate spatially heterogeneous TWS trends. For 2002–2016, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="text.8"/> quantified 34 major regional TWS trends and attributed them to natural interannual variability, unsustainable groundwater consumption, climate change, or combinations thereof. Their analysis highlighted strong cryospheric losses in North America as well as major drying regions in Asia and other continents. In contrast, for Africa positive TWS tendencies in parts of the Sahel and East Africa are reported, attributed to precipitation variability and enhanced groundwater recharge, the so-called Sahelian Paradox <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx149 bib1.bibx135" id="paren.9"/>. South America shows moderate losses dominated by Patagonian glacier retreat, while strong variability driven by El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a complicating factor for detection in the Amazon Basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx123" id="paren.10"/>. Regarding recent synthesis efforts, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.11"/> report a global land TWS loss equivalent to 324 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (excluding Greenland and Antarctica), using a different spatial and methodological framework; this is one of the largest published global land TWS loss estimates to date.</p>
      <p id="d2e464">GWS represents a substantial and regionally heterogeneous component of TWS change. Global anthropogenic groundwater depletion has been estimated at approximately 100–150 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> during the early 21st century, with some model-based estimates reaching up to about 200 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.12"/>. However, regional groundwater gains partly compensate for these losses, which results in substantially smaller net global groundwater storage declines. For 2002–2014, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx144" id="text.13"/> partition global land water storage change by process. Summing the loss terms in their budget – groundwater depletion, endorheic and wetland losses, and deforestation – groundwater accounts for about half of the total, which makes it the largest single loss term. In contrast, for the GRACE/GRACE-FO era, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.14"/> report that groundwater depletion accounts for about 68 % of TWS loss over non-glaciated continental regions. Large-scale analyses based on groundwater well observations confirm widespread  groundwater decline, along with localized recovery resulting from policy interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.15"/>. Major depletion hotspots are the Indo-Gangetic Plain, North China Plain, and the Middle East <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.16"/>, as well as the High Plains Aquifer and California's Central Valley in North America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.17"/>. In Africa, positive GWS anomalies in parts of the Niger Basin and the East African Rift are in contrast to depletion in North African fossil aquifer systems, notably the North Western Sahara Aquifer System (NWSAS) and the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (NSAS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx149 bib1.bibx135" id="paren.18"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>1.3</label><title>Physical drivers, attribution, and interpretation limits</title>
      <p id="d2e539">Attribution of TWS and GWS trends to climate-related and anthropogenic drivers is important, yet challenging. Cryospheric mass loss is a dominant component of global land-mass decline, with Greenland and Antarctica losing approximately 169 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 and 92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 18 Gt yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, over 1992–2020, while glaciers outside the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets lost approximately 199 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 Gt yr<sup>−1</sup> over 2002–2016 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx151 bib1.bibx111" id="paren.19"/>. Outside glaciated regions, groundwater abstraction for irrigation is a major driver of persistent groundwater-storage decline in intensively managed aquifers. In many systems under stress, groundwater extraction exceeds renewable groundwater availability, which results in continued depletion of groundwater storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx143 bib1.bibx117" id="paren.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e594">Climate variability is linked to large-scale modes such as ENSO, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and the Indian Ocean Dipole and is known to modulate precipitation, soil moisture, surface water, and groundwater recharge on interannual to decadal time scales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.21"/>. Assessments indicate that, when integrating across storage compartments, climate forcing may exceed anthropogenic contributions to decadal land water storage change, although this is reported to strongly depend on the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx126" id="paren.22"/>. TWS trends also propagate into sea-level budgets and Earth-system mass closure, and provide constraints on coupled hydrosphere–cryosphere processes  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx118 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.23"/>. However, uncertainties across storage components remain substantial and yet unsolved (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.24"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e609">Hydrological memory is a limiting factor for trend interpretation: groundwater and glaciers contain multi-year climate signals, whereas soil moisture and surface water respond more rapidly. These memory effects, often underrepresented in models, can generate apparent secular trends caused by long-period transient variability in records of limited duration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69 bib1.bibx142" id="paren.25"/>. This provides a strong motivation for the use of statistical frameworks that explicitly account for persistence and stochastic variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.26"/>, as we present in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <label>1.4</label><title>Detectability limits under natural variability and observational errors</title>
      <p id="d2e626">GRACE/GRACE-FO trend magnitudes are typically small relative to seasonal and interannual variability, which motivates additive decompositions into trends, periodic signals, and residual variability from climate and observational noise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.27"/>. Representative global studies combining such decompositions with trend-significance testing show that, although basin-scale trends are often within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm yr<sup>−1</sup> compared to seasonal amplitudes of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 250 mm, statistically significant trends can still be detected across many regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx125" id="paren.28"/>. The trend-to-variability ratio further highlights that trend magnitude alone can falsely detect water-stress hotspots when natural variability is large <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx142" id="paren.29"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e668">Persistent stochastic variability and long-range memory can inflate trend uncertainties and produce apparent trends over finite records <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97 bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx71" id="paren.30"/>. Long-memory behavior (“Hurst effect”) motivates the use of parametric noise models such as ARFIMA processes, while short-term memory can be described by AR(1) models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx110" id="paren.31"/>. Colored noise has been identified in GRACE-derived TWS time series, resulting in underestimated uncertainties if autocorrelation is ignored <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.32"/>. Generalized least squares (GLS) approaches that explicitly model the covariance structure are therefore very well suited under the presence of stochastic memory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.33"/>, and least-squares regression remains reliable even under departures from required distribution properties (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="altparen.34"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <label>1.5</label><title>Research gap and study objectives</title>
      <p id="d2e695">The G3P dataset now enables a globally consistent assessment of GWS variations from satellite gravimetry. This allows us to quantify not only regional groundwater trends, but also continental and global groundwater gains, losses, and net storage changes over the extended GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite gravimetry record.</p>
      <p id="d2e698">However, reliable trend inference from GRACE/GRACE-FO water-storage time series remains challenging. Monthly TWS and GWS records contain persistence, hydrological memory, and correlated observation errors. If this temporal dependence is not considered, trend uncertainties can be underestimated and apparent trends may be incorrectly classified as significant. This also limits detection and attribution studies, because internally generated water-storage variability can be difficult to separate from externally forced change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.35"/>. While optimal fingerprinting is well established for temperature and precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.36"/>, its application to TWS and GWS remains difficult because modeled water-storage variability and individual storage components remain uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx126 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e710">Previous GRACE/GRACE-FO studies have provided important evidence for large-scale TWS change and regional groundwater depletion, e.g., well-studied groundwater and water-storage losses in California and other intensively managed or drought-affected regions  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx139 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.38"/>. However, global groundwater trend assessments still differ strongly in data products, study periods, component separation, spatial masks, and uncertainty treatment. In particular, a globally consistent assessment of statistically significant GWS trends from GRACE and G3P, together with continental and global groundwater gain, loss, and net storage-change budgets, represents a central contribution of this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e716">Here, we address this gap by applying a calibrated time-series framework to 21.5 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO-derived TWS and G3P-based GWS variations. The framework estimates trends and seasonal signals while accounting for short- and long-range temporal dependence in the residuals. This allows us to separate statistically significant long-term storage changes from stochastic variability and to aggregate significant grid-cell trends into volumetric storage-change budgets. By jointly analysing GWS, TWS, and the subtracted storage compartments – root-zone soil moisture, glacier mass, snow water equivalent, and surface water storage – we assess where groundwater dominates freshwater loss or gain, where other storage components control the TWS signal, and where interpretation remains uncertain.</p>
      <p id="d2e720">Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the G3P data products and the statistical trend detection framework. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> analyses spatio-temporal and spectral characteristics of the storage time series, and presents the principal results: statistically significant global and regional groundwater trends, their interpretation based on the literature, and the resulting volumetric storage changes. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> summarizes the main findings of this study and outlines future research.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>G3P data</title>
      <p id="d2e745">For G3P, TWS is based on the level-2 spherical harmonics solution of the COST-G combination product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx100" id="paren.39"/>. For obtaining gridded, spherical-harmonics-based time series of TWS and GWS, the GFZ and G3P data processing workflow for the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions follows a sequential processing chain. First, raw satellite observations are transformed into global gravity field solutions (level-0 to level-2), followed by the generation of gridded level-3 time series of TWS variations. Subsequently, gridded level-4 GWS variations are generated by subtracting the storage variations of the other continental water-storage compartments. The gridded data products are publicly available at GFZ's data portal GravIS (Gravity Information Service, <uri>https://gravis.gfz.de</uri>, last access: 22 October 2026)<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d2e754">GravIS is an online data portal that provides access to gravity-field-related data products, services, and visualizations derived from satellite gravimetry.</p></fn>. Detailed information explaining the processing and generation of the G3P data product is provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.40"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.41"/>. In the following, we highlight the most important aspects of level-4 processing, relevant to this study: GWS variations are derived from level-3 GRACE/GRACE-FO TWS anomalies using a water-balance approach in which storage variations of other continental water compartments are subtracted from TWS:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M28" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GWS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TWS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RZSM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SWE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>GM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SWS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e794">This approach is implemented in the G3P data product, which we use in this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.42"/>, <uri>https://www.g3p.eu/</uri>, last access: 22 October 2026, see, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.43"/> for a general overview). The water-storage compartments subtracted to estimate G3P GWS variations are: <list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d2e808"><italic>Root-zone soil moisture (RZSM).</italic> Derived from a multi-satellite surface soil moisture product of the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) with spatial-temporal gap filling and an infiltration approach to 2 m soil depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx116" id="paren.44"/>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d2e817"><italic>Snow water equivalent (SWE).</italic> Satellite-based data from the GlobSnow product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="paren.45"/> combined with the Copernicus Global Land Service operational SWE product and extended to global coverage for G3P.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label>
      <p id="d2e826"><italic>Glacier mass change (GM).</italic> Based on global gridded data from C3S <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.46"/>, further developed for G3P to monthly resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx157" id="paren.47"/>.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iv.</label>
      <p id="d2e838"><italic>Surface water storage (SWS).</italic> Storage in lakes, rivers, wetlands, and reservoirs from the OS LISFLOOD hydrological model as implemented in the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS) of the Copernicus Emergency Management Service <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx140" id="paren.48"/>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e846">To ensure consistency with the effective spatial resolution of GRACE-derived TWS (approximately 300–500 km), all monthly compartmental storage time series are spatially smoothed with a Gaussian filter of 250 km filter width prior to subtraction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx129" id="paren.49"/>. The filtered storage data are then subtracted from TWS to obtain GWS variations. All storage variables are treated as anomalies with respect to their temporal mean over the reference period. Measurement-type uncertainties are provided based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.50"/>. In this study, the stochastic uncertainty relevant for trend detection is calibrated from the time series themselves to represent the combined effects of measurement noise and natural climate variability (cf. Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e857">For each cell of the global grid, G3P delivers a time series of monthly water storage with units of equivalent water height. The G3P v1.12 dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.51"/>, which we use in this study, is provided on a 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° latitude–longitude grid (nominal resolution), although the effective resolution of GRACE/GRACE-FO observations is coarser <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 300–500 km due to filtering;</named-content></xref>. To reduce computational load while preserving spatial coverage relative to the effective GRACE/GRACE-FO resolution, we downsampled the data by selecting every second grid cell, resulting in 1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1° spacing. This yields a maximum of 14 766 continental time series for each variable, excluding Antarctica and Greenland. The analysed period ranges from April 2002 to September 2023. Because of missing monthly solutions, including the gap between the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions, each grid-cell time series contains a maximum of 225 monthly observations. Besides the focus variables TWS and GWS, we also processed the other compartmental storage variables.</p>
      <p id="d2e889">Since GWS is derived residually, uncertainties, systematic errors, or missing signals in any of the subtracted storage compartments can propagate into the resulting GWS estimate. This is particularly relevant where local or human-managed water-storage changes are not fully represented by the component products. For example, irrigation-related surface wetting may only be partly captured in the RZSM product where it is detectable by satellite surface-soil-moisture observations and may be attenuated during root-zone propagation. Similarly, while human-managed surface-water processes, such as reservoir operation and regulated river or lake storage, are represented in SWS through the OS LISFLOOD/GloFAS model setup, their quality depends on the available model input and process simulation, which are certainly not perfect for all water bodies. Such effects may therefore alias into residual GWS estimates, especially in strongly irrigated or regulated basins. Regarding spatial resolution, a common problem of satellite gravimetry as realized by GRACE and GRACE-FO is the leakage effect (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.53"/>). Leakage describes the inability to localize signals in the GRACE-derived data sets exactly. One cause of leakage is signal attenuation due to the distance between the signal source on, or close to, the Earth's surface and the observing satellites. Further processing steps towards TWS data, foremost spatial filtering, further reduce the spatial resolution of TWS. Together, leakage leads to apparent signal loss (leakage out) or gain (leakage in) inside a given integration region. In our data analysis, we refer to this effect where relevant for interpretation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Time series models</title>
      <p id="d2e910">The time series method described here is applied independently to each grid-cell time series: We estimate a linear trend and periodic signals, model the temporal correlation of the residuals, derive trend uncertainties from the calibrated stochastic model, and test whether the trend differs significantly from zero. The principal advantage of calibrating the stochastic model is a realistic assessment of trend uncertainty under temporal correlation. The corresponding GLS trend estimates may also differ from ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates when the residual covariance structure is taken into account (cf. Sect. S2.6).</p>
      <p id="d2e913">Each G3P time series analysed is represented by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">y</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indexes the monthly samples and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is time in days. Although GRACE/GRACE-FO monthly solutions are not exactly evenly spaced due to irregular mission operations (e.g., see <uri>https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/data/grace-months/</uri>, last access: 20 January 2026), we use an average monthly sampling interval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30.4375 d, consistent with the average length of a Gregorian month. Observations are assigned to the middle of each month. Missing monthly solutions, including the gap between the GRACE and GRACE-FO missions, are retained as missing epochs and are not interpolated. Trends estimated on the daily time axis in mm d<sup>−1</sup> are converted to mm yr<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1104">For each grid cell, the following additive time-series model is considered:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo mathsize="2.0em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the intercept and slope of the linear trend function. The periodic terms are described by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denoting the amplitude and phase of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th periodic signal at frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the exploratory spectral analysis and spatio-temporal analysis in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>, we choose <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, comprising the annual signal and its first five overtones (i.e. the second to sixth harmonics), with frequencies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> d<sup>−1</sup> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These terms define the functional model.</p>
      <p id="d2e1487">The residuals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contain remaining inter- and intra-annual geophysical variability, commonly referred to as “climate noise”, as well as measurement and processing noise. We model these residuals as combinations of autocorrelated and uncorrelated stochastic processes. Motivated by the exploratory power spectral density (PSD) analysis in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>, we consider two stochastic model combinations (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx101" id="altparen.54"/>):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PL</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WN</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">WN</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the variance component of each stochastic process, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the correlation matrix, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the identity matrix (both of dimensions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The first model combines power-law noise with white noise and represents long-range temporal dependence. The second combines first-order autoregressive noise with white noise and represents short-range persistence. In both cases, the white-noise term accounts for uncorrelated measurement and processing noise.</p>
      <p id="d2e1679">The power-law correlation matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the spectral index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which describes the slope of the power-law PSD in log-log space. Random-walk, flicker, and white noise are special cases of the power-law model, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, respectively. The AR(1) correlation matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AR</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the lag-1 coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and represents short-range temporal correlation.</p>
      <p id="d2e1782">We illustrate the different stochastic processes and noise types in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>. These synthetic time series are sampled in a GRACE-like manner. All process realizations were drawn from the same normally distributed white noise. The corresponding PSDs show that the processes reflect different correlation structures and strengths, particularly at low frequencies. Flicker-noise and random-walk realizations exhibit increasing power at low frequencies, which inflates the estimated trend uncertainties. These effects are weaker for short-range memory models such as AR(1). White noise has constant power across frequencies and no temporal correlation, which would lead to unrealistically narrow confidence intervals if coloured noise is present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. In general, stronger low-frequency power indicates stronger temporal correlation and results in larger, but more realistic trend uncertainty.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1794">Synthetic GRACE-like time series and corresponding power spectral densities (PSDs) for the stochastic processes considered in this study. Left: synthetic realizations of white noise, AR(1) noise, flicker noise, and random-walk noise; note the different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis scale for random-walk noise. Right: empirical PSD (dots) and analytical PSD (lines) of the time series shown in the left panel.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e1810">We use the Hector software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.56"/> to estimate the functional parameters of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and the parameters of the selected stochastic model for each grid-cell time series. The variance components and stochastic-model parameters are estimated from the residuals using restricted maximum likelihood estimation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx113" id="paren.57"/>, which accounts for the loss of degrees of freedom due to the fitted functional model, additionally resulting in more realistic variance estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The stochastic-model parameters include the spectral index of the power-law model and the lag-1 coefficient of the AR(1) model. For each grid-cell time series, main quantities are estimated trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and its uncertainty, represented by the standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are used for the significance test and volumetric aggregation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Significance testing</title>
      <p id="d2e1859">We apply the significance test under the assumption that the estimated trend is approximately normally distributed. Residual-distribution diagnostics for TWS and GWS, combined over all grid cells, are provided in Fig. S3 in the Supplement. To test whether the estimated trend <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> from each TWS and GWS time series is significant, we define the null and alternative hypotheses as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            For each time series and each variable, the test quantity is then formed as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation of the estimated trend, obtained from the corresponding diagonal element of the parameter covariance matrix. Our main results rely on two-sided 99 % confidence levels to reduce false-positive trend detections in the global grid-cell analysis. This results in a significance threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.58. The use of this test statistic, and its suitability when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is derived from a calibrated stochastic model, is discussed in more detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.59"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.60"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Clustering and volumetric aggregation</title>
      <p id="d2e2052">For the exploratory spatio-temporal analysis in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>, we further apply <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering is an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm that partitions data into a predefined number of clusters by minimizing within-cluster variance. When being applied to a time-series-populated feature matrix, it iteratively assigns each time series to the nearest cluster <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96" id="paren.61"/>. For the first application, the clustering is used to globally identify dominant TWS and GWS time series patterns. From this result we also use a GWS clustering class as an input for the illustration of significant and non-significant GWS time series. Therefore, we subsequently use another clustering to highlight differences between significant and non-significant time series classes, lying in adjacent regions. The clustering is not used for trend-significance testing or physical attribution.</p>
      <p id="d2e2074">Significant grid-cell trends are converted to volumetric rates and aggregated into continental and global gain, loss, and net storage-change budgets, as explained in the following: the inputs are the estimated grid-cell trends and trend uncertainties on the downsampled 1° integration grid. Grid centres are assigned to continents using the Natural Earth Admin-0 Countries 1:110m shapefile (<monospace>ne_110m_admin_0_countries.shp</monospace>). Grid centres not covered by a country polygon are assigned to the nearest valid land-country polygon; grid-cell areas are computed separately and  geodetically on the WGS84 ellipsoid. We use the Natural Earth <monospace>CONTINENT</monospace> attribute for all country-to-continent assignments, excluding Russia. For Russia, grid cells west of 60° E are assigned to Europe and those at or east of 60° E to Asia. A grid cell is classified as significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.58, corresponding to the two-sided 99 % confidence level used above. Only statistically significant grid-cell trends are included in the budgets. Greenland and Antarctica are excluded from both TWS and GWS aggregation. The defined Canadian Arctic Archipelago mask, detailed in Sect. S1.1 in the Supplement, is additionally excluded from the GWS aggregation because residual GWS signals there are especially sensitive to cryospheric leakage and GIA uncertainty; the same cells are retained in the TWS aggregation, where cryospheric mass change is a physically important part of TWS. For comparison, we additionally compute all-cell aggregates from all retained grid cells with finite trend estimates, without significance filtering, and assess GWS-to-TWS ratios under treatment of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago mask (Sect. S1.1).</p>
      <p id="d2e2115">Grid-cell trends in mm yr<sup>−1</sup> equivalent water height are converted to volumetric rates by multiplying with the corresponding grid-cell area:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M99" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the estimated grid-cell trend and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the grid-cell area in km<sup>2</sup>. The factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converts mm km<sup>2</sup> to km<sup>3</sup>, yielding volume-change rates in km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, numerically equivalent to Gt yr<sup>−1</sup> for freshwater.</p>
      <p id="d2e2274">Positive and negative significant grid-cell contributions are summed separately to obtain gross gains and gross losses; their sum defines the net storage-change rate. Continental values are obtained by aggregating the significant grid-cell contributions within each continent. Global gain, loss, and net storage-change rates are obtained by summing the corresponding continental contributions. Global mean trends in mm yr<sup>−1</sup> are reported as significant-area-weighted means. The procedure is described in more detail in Sect. S1.1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d2e2299">We first use exploratory spatio-temporal and spectral analyses to characterize the dominant variability patterns in the G3P storage time series (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>). We then present the core results, statistically significant TWS and GWS trends and their regional interpretation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>), followed by the continental and global storage-change budgets and additionally a 95 % threshold assessment (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>). We conclude this part with a discussion on trend significance, model validation and sensitivity to the regression method (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Exploratory analysis: spatio-temporal and spectral data features</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Time-domain clustering</title>
      <p id="d2e2324">We first use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering as an exploratory tool to summarize dominant time-series patterns present in the G3P data, and to motivate the choice of the methods presented in the previous section. Clustering is based on the temporal structure of the grid-cell time series and does not use the subsequently estimated trend magnitudes, uncertainties, or significance information. Clusters should not be interpreted as hydrological process classes, but as groups of regions with similar temporal time series behaviour.</p>
      <p id="d2e2334">The corresponding TWS clustering mainly separates background seasonal/interannual variability, tropical seasonal regimes with different phase and amplitude, moderate depletion-like behaviour, and strong cryosphere-dominated mass loss. The full TWS clustering result is shown and discussed in Sect. S2.1.</p>
      <p id="d2e2337">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows the exploratory clustering of GWS time series. Compared with TWS, GWS seasonality is generally less pronounced because root-zone soil moisture is removed in the G3P groundwater estimate. Most regions are characterized by background GWS variability or high-latitude seasonal/interannual variability (purple and blue clusters). Moderate GWS drying occurs mainly across mid-latitudes, including large parts of North America and Eastern Europe, and extends into Central and Southern Asia, as well as, to a lesser extent, South America, Southern Africa, and Oceania. The strongest negative behaviour is grouped in the strong GWS decline/cryosphere-adjacent cluster, including northern India and parts of the Canadian Arctic. The northern Indian pattern is consistent with known groundwater depletion from intensive groundwater use, whereas high-latitude signals near the Canadian Arctic require cautious interpretation because they may include leakage from nearby cryospheric mass loss or component-separation artefacts. Positive GWS tendencies occur in parts of Central Africa, South America, the U.S. Midwest and Great Lakes region, Russia, and Central China. The Amazon high-amplitude seasonality cluster remains distinct, reflecting large seasonal groundwater-storage variations.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2345">Exploratory <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering of groundwater storage (GWS) time-series from the G3P data. The map shows the spatial distribution of six clusters, and the sub-panels show the corresponding cluster time series with descriptive cluster names. The black line represents the cluster-mean time series. Units are millimetres of equivalent water height.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2361">Overall, the clustering reveals distinct GWS variability regimes, ranging from widespread background and seasonal/interannual variability to broad mid-latitude drying, localized strong depletion, and regional storage gains, while high-latitude residual signals require cautious interpretation. Formal trend detection and regional interpretation are presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>, while volumetric aggregation is presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Spectral analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e2376">To assess data characteristics in the spectral domain and to motivate the stochastic models used for trend uncertainty estimation, we compute Lomb-Scargle periodograms for all time series and for each storage compartment. The resulting globally averaged PSDs, averaged per frequency, are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, left panel. We observe pronounced peaks at the annual and semi-annual periods, indicating the substantial contribution of seasonal variability to water storage variations, particularly of RZSM and SWS to contribute to TWS. Further peaks occur at 3 and 4 cycles per year (cpy), corresponding to 4- to 3-month intervals, and additionally at 5 and 6 cpy for some compartment variables, i.e. approximately every second month. When compared with the synthetic examples presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>, all variables show pronounced contributions of coloured, i.e. correlated, noise of both long- and short-range type. This is indicated by higher PSD magnitudes at low frequencies, i.e. long periods, and lower magnitudes at high frequencies, i.e. short periods. The presence of trends still affects the PSDs at long periods.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2385">Averaged global power spectral densities (PSDs) of the G3P variables. Left: PSDs of the original time series. Right: PSDs after removal of linear trend and periodic terms by ordinary least-squares regression. TWS: terrestrial water storage; GWS: groundwater storage; RZSM: root-zone soil moisture; SWS: surface water storage; SWE: snow water equivalent; glaciers: glacier mass (GM).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2394">To better assess the influence of trends and seasonal signals, and to reveal the stochastic character of the data, we remove identified periodic seasonal signals (1–6 cpy) and a linear trend using OLS regression. The resulting PSDs of the residuals (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, right panel) mostly reflect inter and intraannual variations and observation-system noise. For TWS, GWS, SWS, and glacier mass, we observe spectra close to constant negative slopes in log-log space, indicating power-law behaviour and long-range dependence. Broad interannual power in TWS and GWS variations, approximately over 2–7-year periods, is largely explained by superposed climate modes: combinations of ENSO-, PDO-, and AMO-related effects account for 20 % to 70 % of interannual TWS variability in global basins, with interannual amplitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 cm equivalent water height <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx114" id="paren.62"/>. The observed power-law spectra of GWS are consistent with long-memory groundwater dynamics, as also found in multi-decadal groundwater-level records that exhibit fractal, power-law scaling and long-range persistence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91 bib1.bibx93" id="paren.63"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2413">The spectra of SWE and RZSM tend to flatten at long periods, indicating AR(1)-type, i.e. short-range memory, behaviour. RZSM residuals are well described by AR(1)-type exponential memory, with slightly stronger persistence in drier regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.64"/>. SWE anomalies exhibit strong within-season persistence, consistent with short-range memory behaviour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx132" id="paren.65"/>, which is also identifiable from our SWE spectrum. In contrast, PSDs of glacier mass and SWS variations indicate power-law behaviour. Long-range dependence with power-law behaviour has also been shown for global river runoff <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.66"/>, which is consistent with the influence of storage components with longer memory, such as groundwater and glaciers. Glacier mass anomalies can show power-law behaviour over the analysed frequency band, because multiple slow response times make glaciers a multi-timescale low-pass system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx121" id="paren.67"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2428">Remaining side lobes in the residual PSDs indicate that a fixed set of sinusoidal terms does not fully capture time-variable seasonal amplitude and phase. Such residual spectral structures are expected for hydrological time series with seasonally modulated storage dynamics, resulting from asymmetric recharge–discharge cycles, secondary seasonal peaks, and data gaps. They are particularly visible around the annual and semi-annual periods and in the 2–4 cpy band. As predominantly the intra-annual band is affected, their remaining effect on trend determination, particularly on uncertainty, is expected to be limited and is partially accounted for through the stochastic model calibration. A more detailed discussion of the component-wise spectral behaviour, including representative GWS and RZSM PSDs before and after removal of periodic and trend terms, is provided in Sect. S2.2.</p>
      <p id="d2e2431">Our exploratory spectral analysis yields three key findings: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2436"><italic>Trend-related low-frequency power.</italic> Differences between the PSDs of the original time series and the residuals show that trend-related low-frequency power is strongest for glacier mass and is also evident for TWS, SWS, and GWS, whereas RZSM and SWE exhibit comparatively weak trend contributions.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2442"><italic>Frequency-dependent component dominance.</italic> Across most of the analysed frequency range, GWS exhibits the largest spectral amplitudes among the individual storage components and therefore constitutes the dominant storage-component signal within TWS. Because GWS is obtained by component subtraction, these amplitudes may also include TWS observation errors and variability not represented in the subtracted components. Glacier mass dominates only at the very lowest frequencies, which results from strong trend contributions. Among the modelled non-groundwater components, RZSM has the largest spectral amplitudes across much of the seasonal-to-interannual frequency range.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2448"><italic>Variability and memory regimes.</italic> The residual spectra indicate long-memory behaviour for TWS, GWS, SWS, and glacier mass, and short-range persistence for RZSM and SWE. The detailed comparison of GWS and RZSM (Sect. S2.2) further shows that RZSM is dominated by seasonal periodic variability, whereas GWS exhibits a pronounced persistent inter-annual variability after removal of the functional signals.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e2453">Based on these spectral characteristics, we use power-law-plus-white-noise models for TWS, GWS, SWS, and glacier mass, and first-order-autoregressive-plus-white-noise models for RZSM and SWE when estimating trend uncertainties.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Global trends in TWS and GWS, and their significance</title>
      <p id="d2e2465">As explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, we fit trends and trend uncertainties to each TWS and GWS grid-cell time series. For the stochastic component, we use power-law-white-noise models as identified in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> represents the core results: along with the estimated trends, it highlights the significant trends at the 99 % confidence level in TWS (top) and GWS (bottom). Trends in the other G3P storage components (glacier mass, RZSM, SWS, SWE) are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, for which also the identified stochastic processes have been fitted. Maps of estimated TWS and GWS trends without significance-shading can be found in Figs. S4 and S5, Sect. S2.4 in the Supplement. The same figures also discuss stochastic properties (power-law coefficients and trend uncertainties) of the TWS and GWS data, which further support the choice of our models. Figure S6 compares histograms of the parameters shown in Figs. S4 and S5, for TWS and GWS. The median trend uncertainty is lower for GWS than for TWS (2.59 versus 3.86 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>), which is consistent with the reduced low-frequency persistence after component separation (Fig. S6, middle panel).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2490">Central result of the global trend analysis: significant G3P TWS <bold>(a)</bold> and GWS trends <bold>(b)</bold> under consideration of the calibrated time series models introduced in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, and the statistical test. Shading with “X” represents data with insignificant trends, while all non-shaded trends represent statistically significant trends.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2509">Global trends in glacier mass <bold>(a)</bold>, RZSM <bold>(b)</bold>, SWS <bold>(c)</bold>, and SWE <bold>(d)</bold>. Note that colorbar limits differ among panels.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2531">In the following, we discuss the main TWS and GWS trend patterns shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, ordered by continent and region. Where relevant, we relate these patterns to the component trends in RZSM, glacier mass, SWS, and SWE shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, and to the auxiliary fitting parameters presented in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d2e2538">At the global scale, the strongest significant TWS declines coincide with regions of strong ice and glacier mass loss, including Patagonia/Southern Andes, Alaska, and Arctic islands, consistent with earlier work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx141 bib1.bibx151 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.68"/>. In the G3P glacier component (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a), glacier retreat dominates low-frequency TWS decline in Canada, Alaska, the Arctic, Patagonia, and the Himalaya, reaching magnitudes up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. GRACE-derived glacier mass budgets similarly show strongly negative trends, e.g., in Alaska, Patagonia, Arctic Canada, Svalbard and the Russian Arctic, in total summing to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 199 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> over 2002–2016, excluding Greenland and Antarctica <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx151" id="paren.69"/>. Additional prominent negative TWS trends are associated with drought and water depletion, including regions with possible or partial direct human impact <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120" id="paren.70"/>, and with long-term declines in the Aral and Caspian basins driven by irrigation diversion in the Aral region and regional aridification and enhanced evaporation in the Caspian region. In contrast, the significant GWS trends highlight non-cryospheric freshwater-storage changes, dominating other TWS declines. Major negative GWS patterns occur in intensively managed or semi-arid aquifer regions, including northern India, the North China Plain, Southwest/Central Asia, the High Plains Aquifer, parts of the southwestern US and northern Mexico, and North African fossil aquifer systems. Notably, positive GWS tendencies are most prominent in parts of the Sahel, the Niger Basin, Central/East Africa, and selected mid-latitude regions. Apparent GWS declines in Arctic and ice-adjacent regions require careful interpretation because residual leakage from cryospheric mass loss, GIA uncertainty, and imperfections in the subtracted storage components can propagate into the residual GWS estimate.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>North America</title>
      <p id="d2e2614">For North America, our analysis separates four main regimes: cryosphere-dominated TWS decline in Alaska and Arctic Canada; significant non-cryospheric GWS losses in semi-arid and intensively managed aquifer regions; positive or weakly positive storage tendencies around the Great Lakes and eastern Canada; and regions where apparent TWS trends remain non-significant because of strong interannual variability and large trend uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Alaska, Yukon, and the Canadian Arctic</title>
      <p id="d2e2623">The strongest significant TWS declines in North America occur near the Gulf of Alaska and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, where they primarily reflect glacier and ice-mass loss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120 bib1.bibx151" id="paren.71"/>. Outside the strongly glaciated regions, negative TWS and locally significant GWS trends in parts of the Mackenzie and Yukon basins are identified, consistent with permafrost-thaw-related hydrological change, and including increased groundwater connectivity and discharge and associated changes in soil moisture, surface water, and evapotranspiration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx152" id="paren.72"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2632">The GWS pattern across Alaska and Yukon is spatially heterogeneous. Coastal negative anomalies may reflect residual leakage from the strong glacier-mass signal, whereas localized positive GWS tendencies of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> extend across parts of central Alaska, Yukon, and the Yukon–Kuskokwim lowlands. Their contrast with groundwater losses reported for earlier periods may reflect temporal changes, product and processing differences, or limitations of the storage-component separation in glaciated and permafrost-dominated regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx92" id="paren.73"/>. Localized positive TWS and GWS tendencies also occur across parts of the western Canadian Arctic Archipelago, largely outside the regions of strongest glacier mass loss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx108 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.74"/>. Because these areas are nevertheless affected by active permafrost degradation and thermokarst processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.75"/>, the mechanisms underlying the positive trends remain uncertain.</p>
      <p id="d2e2671">In the eastern Canadian Arctic Archipelago, particularly the Queen Elizabeth Islands, significant apparent GWS declines of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> require particularly careful interpretation. They may be influenced by leakage from Greenland and local ice-mass loss, errors in the GIA correction, or imperfections in the subtracted storage components. These high-latitude regions therefore represent GWS sensitivity zones where strong TWS trends, dominated by ice mass loss, cannot be directly attributed to groundwater depletion. These map-level GWS tendencies are retained in the spatial figures for interpretation, but all grid cells falling inside the defined mask (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>) are excluded from the volumetric GWS aggregation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Western and central Canada</title>
      <p id="d2e2708">In the Canadian Prairies, particularly Alberta and the Saskatchewan River Basin, negative TWS tendencies are often not statistically significant because of strong interannual and persistent low-frequency variability and the resulting large trend uncertainties (cf. Sect. S2.4, Fig. S4). GWS, in contrast, shows more spatially coherent and locally significant declines. The shift of power-law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the GWS series relative to TWS (Fig. S6) indicates reduced low-frequency variability after the component-separation step. This TWS–GWS contrast is one of the main regional findings for North America: groundwater-related drying can be detected more distinctly than total-storage decline where TWS is dominated by interannual variability. The GWS pattern is broadly consistent with groundwater abstraction under semi-arid conditions and recurrent drought <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx148" id="paren.76"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2721">Similar drying patterns occur around Great Slave Lake and towards the Hudson Bay region. In discontinuous-permafrost regions, thaw can enhance groundwater connectivity, subsurface drainage, and river discharge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx152 bib1.bibx68" id="paren.77"/>. Northern Quebec and adjacent regions also show a transition from previously reported wetting toward widespread drying, consistent with recent continental assessments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx148" id="paren.78"/>. However, GIA-model uncertainty is substantial around Hudson Bay and can affect both TWS and residual GWS trend magnitudes and, locally, their signs (cf. Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS7"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Great Lakes and eastern Canada</title>
      <p id="d2e2738">In the Great Lakes Basin, positive TWS tendencies are consistent with the observed transition from record-low water levels in 2013 to record highs by 2017 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.79"/>. The corresponding GWS tendencies are positive but not statistically significant. This differs from the GWS decline reported for 2002–2009 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="text.80"/>, plausibly because the longer study period includes the pronounced post-2013 lake-level recovery.</p>
      <p id="d2e2747">Localized significant positive TWS and GWS trends also occur across parts of eastern Canada, including southern Quebec and the Ottawa Valley, and may reflect increased precipitation and groundwater recharge under cold and humid climatic conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.81"/>. Their contrast with negative trends reported for some eastern Canadian regions over shorter periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.82"/> may arise from differences in study period, spatial resolution, GIA correction, or signal processing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Southwestern US, High Plains Aquifer, and northern Mexico</title>
      <p id="d2e2763">The clearest non-cryospheric GWS-depletion regime in North America extends across the southwestern US, the High Plains Aquifer, northern Mexico, and the Mexico City region. Significant TWS and GWS declines across New Mexico, Arizona, and the High Plains reflect groundwater abstraction for irrigation coupled with recurrent drought <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx124 bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.83"/>. In the High Plains Aquifer, local GWS trends exceed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, reflecting the documented long-term depletion of the aquifer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.84"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Component-level interpretation</title>
      <p id="d2e2797">The component trends assist in distinguishing groundwater-related change from snow, surface-water, and soil-moisture contributions. SWE decreases across southwestern Canada and the Canadian Pacific Northwest and also in parts of the eastern and northern Hudson Bay drainage regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d). In contrast, slightly positive SWE tendencies occur in parts of the Yukon and Mackenzie basins, indicating that their negative TWS tendencies are not explained by declining snow storage alone. SWS exhibits distinct basin-scale changes, including negative tendencies around Williston Lake and Lake Winnipeg, weaker negative tendencies around Great Slave and Great Bear Lakes, and positive tendencies in the Great Lakes and southern Quebec. These patterns reflect reservoir regulation, changing precipitation and flooding regimes, and observed lake-level variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx130 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.85"/>. RZSM decreases across substantial parts of central and western Canada, supporting the interpretation of regional drying associated with changing precipitation regimes and recurrent drought <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.86"/>; in northern regions, these changes may interact with permafrost-thaw-related drainage and enhanced hydrological connectivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx152" id="paren.87"/>. Thus, the Canadian TWS pattern reflects contributions from several storage components, while the more spatially coherent GWS losses identify regions in which groundwater-related drying is particularly pronounced.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>South America</title>
      <p id="d2e2819">Despite locally high-magnitude trend estimates, TWS and GWS exhibit few statistically significant trends across most of South America. More negative power-law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, locally approaching random-walk behaviour, indicate strong persistent low-frequency variability and correspondingly large trend uncertainties (Sect. S2.4, top and middle panels of Figs. S4 and S5). The main exceptions are the cryosphere-dominated TWS decline in Patagonia and localized significant GWS depletion in the northern Altiplano and adjacent Andean drylands. Our analysis therefore separates these localized groundwater losses from extensive regions where strong interannual and persistent low-frequency variability prevents the reliable detection of long-term trends. This contrast is particularly evident when GWS is considered separately from the well-documented cryospheric TWS decline in Patagonia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Altiplano and Andean drylands</title>
      <p id="d2e2835">The clearest significant GWS declines occur in the northern Altiplano, centred around La Paz and extending westward across the Peru–Bolivia–Chile tri-border region, with local trends reaching approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. These declines are spatially consistent with regions affected by groundwater stress related to agriculture and mining <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.88"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2860">Farther south, parts of the Andean “Lithium Triangle” across northern Argentina, southwestern Bolivia, and northeastern Chile show localized low-magnitude positive GWS trends instead of a principal depletion signal. Freshwater inputs in these basins are  low (2–33 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>), even as brine and freshwater are extracted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.89"/>. The positive residual GWS tendencies may reflect spatial and temporal variability in recharge, differences between freshwater and brine-storage signals, or limitations of the storage-component separation. This should therefore not yet be interpreted as evidence that mining-related extraction has no hydrological effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx7" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Patagonia</title>
      <p id="d2e2884">The strong TWS decline in Patagonia is primarily associated with the well-documented loss of glacier and ice mass <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.90"/>. The corresponding GWS pattern is spatially offset, including positive tendencies in northwestern Chubut and negative tendencies in northeastern Santa Cruz. Its limited spatial correspondence with the glacier component suggests that these GWS tendencies do not simply spatially match the dominant cryospheric TWS signal. However, their interpretation remains sensitive to leakage and uncertainty in the separation of the storage components.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx8" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Amazon, La Plata, and São Francisco basins</title>
      <p id="d2e2897">Across the Amazon, La Plata, and São Francisco basins, most apparent TWS and GWS trends are not statistically significant after accounting for strong interannual and persistent low-frequency variability, with more negative power-law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values locally approaching random-walk behaviour (Sect. S2.4). Non-significance is therefore an important result: visible regional tendencies cannot generally be distinguished from stochastic storage variability over this study's data period. In the Amazon Basin, the estimated trends form a dipole-like pattern, with negative tendencies in the north and pronounced positive tendencies near the delta, but neither constitutes a pronounced basin-wide trend. Although a basin-mean tendency is broadly compatible with previously reported storage gains, it is not statistically significant in our analysis. Strong ENSO events and subsequent recovery periods contribute substantially to the observed variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx123" id="paren.91"/>. Similarly, drought-related storage losses previously reported for the southern La Plata Basin, particularly during 2002–2009 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.92"/>, do not remain significant over the full study period. This can be consistently interpreted with the episodic character of regional drought and with spatially uneven and partial recovery  during subsequent periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx105" id="paren.93"/>. In the São Francisco Basin, independent evidence for reductions in streamflow and groundwater-supported baseflow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.94"/> is likewise not expressed as a spatially extensive significant GWS trend in our analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx9" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Component-level interpretation</title>
      <p id="d2e2926">The component trends support regional hydrological drying without implying widespread significant groundwater depletion. RZSM decreases across central South America, including Bolivia, northeastern Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, and southern to southwestern Brazil (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). While future projections indicate possible soil-moisture increases in southeastern South America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.95"/>, historical multi-product assessments show substantial regional variability and drying tendencies over recent decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx122 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.96"/>. SWS also decreases in the broader São Francisco region, which is consistent with recurrent drought and documented reductions in streamflow and baseflow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.97"/>. Negative SWS tendencies around Uruguay and Paraguay likely reflect recurrent drought conditions in the La Plata Basin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx105" id="paren.98"/>. These component trends help explain parts of the TWS signal but do not alter the principal GWS result: significant groundwater losses are concentrated in the northern Altiplano and adjacent Andean drylands, while parts of the  Lithium Triangle show localized positive residual GWS tendencies. Significant  long-term groundwater trends remain limited across most of the continent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Europe</title>
      <p id="d2e2951">Our analysis indicates a broad but mostly moderate GWS drying tendency across Europe. At the primary 99 % significance level, negative GWS trends are spatially localized, particularly in eastern France, southern Ukraine, and northeastern Spain, which is broadly consistent with previously identified Euro-Mediterranean groundwater-depletion regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx153" id="paren.99"/>. Europe provides a useful example of moderate negative trends whose detected spatial extent depends on the significance threshold: At the 95 % threshold, the negative GWS pattern becomes substantially more spatially coherent, extending from northeastern Spain across large parts of France into Germany and the Alpine region (to be discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>). The 99 %-significant trends are therefore embedded within a broader negative pattern that becomes apparent when the significance threshold is slightly relaxed.</p>
      <p id="d2e2959">An important feature is that significant GWS trends cover a larger part of Europe than significant TWS trends at both thresholds. At 99 %, significant GWS trends cover 1.1 million km<sup>2</sup>, compared with 0.8 million km<sup>2</sup> for TWS (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). At 95 %, the corresponding areas increase to 2.2 and 1.3 million km<sup>2</sup>, respectively (Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplement). Thus, the broader GWS drying pattern is detected more consistently than the corresponding TWS pattern, despite the generally moderate magnitude of the GWS trends.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2996">Significance-filtered TWS trend and water budget statistics by continent. Significant trends computed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trend</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.58, corresponding to the 99 % confidence level. The mean trend is the area-weighted mean over significant grid cells, and Net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Loss.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Areal coverage </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Mean trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Volume change </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sig. area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sig. frac.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Gain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Loss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Net</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(mm yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">33.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">25.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">98.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>89.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">95.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oceania</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">16.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">132.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">21.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">232.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3516">Significance-filtered GWS trend statistics by continent. Significant trends computed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trend</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.58, corresponding to the 99 % confidence level. The mean trend is the area-weighted mean over significant grid cells, and Net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Gain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Loss.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Areal coverage </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">Mean trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8" align="center">Volume change </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sig. area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sig. frac.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Gain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Loss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Net</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(10<sup>6</sup> km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(mm yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">29.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">37.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">68.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oceania</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">17.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">76.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">103.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4026">Localized positive GWS trends occur in Denmark, coastal southwestern Finland, Estonia, and coastal western Norway. These may reflect regional recharge variability, but direct attribution is beyond the scope of this study. In northern and coastal regions, component-separation errors and uncertainty in the GIA correction may additionally affect the residual GWS signal.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx10" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Relation between TWS and GWS</title>
      <p id="d2e4035">Across many non-glaciated parts of Europe, TWS and GWS trends show broad spatial correspondence, suggesting a substantial groundwater contribution to regional TWS change. Significant declines in both quantities occur particularly in southern Scandinavia and the northern UK, while the broader GWS drying pattern is consistent with previous GRACE-based groundwater assessments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx153" id="paren.100"/>. The central Scandinavian decline may indicate a reversal relative to the wetting reported for 2002–2011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx146" id="paren.101"/>. The northern UK signal is less prominent in previous GRACE syntheses and is only partly consistent with reported in situ groundwater declines, which were mainly identified farther south <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.102"/>. The larger spatial extent of significant GWS trends, despite their smaller magnitude, likely reflects reduced temporal variability after removal of the other storage components. In TWS, seasonal and interannual variability from soil moisture, snow, and surface water increases trend uncertainty and can obscure moderate long-term groundwater-related changes. Because GWS is derived by component subtraction, however, this greater statistical detectability should not be interpreted as inherently lower physical uncertainty. The different spatial extent of significant TWS and GWS trends also highlights that trend magnitude does not imply statistical significance. At 99 %, the significant European TWS cells have an area-weighted mean trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.0 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> and a net change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.1 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, substantially more negative than the corresponding GWS values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). The strong TWS aggregate is therefore produced by a smaller significant area with comparatively large negative trends (e.g., Iceland), whereas the GWS drying signal is weaker in magnitude but significant over a larger area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx11" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Component-level interpretation and high-latitude sensitivity</title>
      <p id="d2e4153">The component trends help explain this contrast. RZSM shows weak-to-moderate drying over Iberia, consistent with recurrent drought conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx134" id="paren.103"/>, while SWS trends are mostly weak. SWE shows small positive tendencies in the north and negative tendencies farther south. Negative glacier trends over Norway and the Alps are consistent with accelerated glacier mass loss <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx158 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.104"/>. Because the adopted European domain also includes high-latitude cryosphere- and GIA-sensitive regions, the strongly negative continent-wide TWS aggregate cannot be interpreted as groundwater dominated without an additional cryosphere-specific analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e4162">In Fennoscandia and the British Isles, uncertainty in the GIA correction can affect both TWS and residual GWS trend magnitudes and, locally, their signs. GWS carries the additional uncertainty of the component-separation procedure, while leakage from glacier mass loss may further affect signals in western Norway. Northern Europe should therefore be regarded as an artefact-sensitive region, in the same sense as discussed for northern Canada.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Africa</title>
      <p id="d2e4173">Our analysis reveals one of the clearest continent-scale contrasts in GWS: statistically significant depletion across northern Africa is opposed by widespread positive GWS trends extending from the Sahel and Niger Basin into parts of central and eastern Africa. Localized declines additionally occur in southeastern Africa and Madagascar.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx12" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Northern Africa</title>
      <p id="d2e4182">Statistically significant, predominantly moderate, but large-scale GWS declines extend across Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, northern Chad, and northern Egypt. The spatial pattern is consistent with depletion of the North Western Sahara Aquifer System (NWSAS) and Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (NSAS) reported in previous modelling and GRACE-based assessments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx135 bib1.bibx128" id="paren.105"/>, now demonstrated to be significant. Groundwater pumping is commonly identified as the principal driver, although atmospheric water-balance variability may also contribute, particularly in the NWSAS. The broader pattern is also consistent with the high-resolution GRACE TWS trend analysis of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="text.106"/>. Despite a considerable natural variability previously reported for African TWS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx120 bib1.bibx106" id="paren.107"/>, the northern African GWS-depletion signal remains persistent under our stochastic significance assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx13" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>West Africa and the Sahel</title>
      <p id="d2e4202">Pronounced significant positive GWS trends, locally exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, are concentrated in the Niger Basin and surrounding Sahelian regions. These trends agree with previous reports indicating groundwater increases in the Sahel and are consistent with enhanced recharge associated with rainfall variability, land-use change, and the so-called “Sahelian paradox” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx149 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx135" id="paren.108"/>. Co-located positive TWS trends support the presence of a net regional water-storage increase, although the partitioning among storage components remains model-dependent. The available data are insufficient to attribute GWS gains to a single recharge mechanism.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx14" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Central and East Africa</title>
      <p id="d2e4233">Central Africa exhibits greater spatial heterogeneity. Non-significant negative tendencies occur in parts of the Congo Basin, whereas significant positive GWS trends are found around Chad and Sudan (in the Sahelian zone) and Cameroon. These spatial contrasts may reflect the combined influence of subsurface storage variability and large-scale climate modes, including ENSO and the Indian Ocean Dipole <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.109"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4239">In the broader northern East African region, significant positive GWS trends are concentrated across parts of South Sudan, large parts of Ethiopia, and Somalia. Farther south, strong interannual variability limits  trend detection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.110"/>, see Sect. S2.4, Fig. S5. Although pronounced trends characterize these regions, the absence of widespread significant trends is therefore a result of the stochastic behaviour under long memory, as it is the case for Uganda, for example.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx15" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Southern Africa and Madagascar</title>
      <p id="d2e4251">Southern Africa shows predominantly weak positive or non-significant GWS tendencies, interrupted by localized declines in southern Mozambique and Madagascar. These negative trends are spatially consistent with regions affected by recurrent drought <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx133" id="paren.111"/>. Drying tendencies over southern Angola and Namibia are more evident in RZSM than in GWS, indicating that regional drying is expressed more clearly in soil moisture than in groundwater storage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx16" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Component-level interpretation</title>
      <p id="d2e4263">Across Africa, GWS also explains a substantial part of the large-scale TWS trend pattern, particularly the contrast between northern depletion and Sahelian and East African gains (cf. Figs. S4 and S5). The component trends nevertheless show important regional differences. RZSM decreases in northwest Africa, consistent with declining Mediterranean precipitation and increasing drought frequency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx127 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.112"/>, and also shows drying over southern Angola and Namibia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.113"/>. Additional RZSM drying tendencies in parts of central Africa remain uncertain and require validation with independent products.</p>
      <p id="d2e4272">SWS trends are spatially heterogeneous, with negative tendencies around Lakes Tanganyika and Victoria and positive tendencies around Lake Malawi. The former contrast with documented lake-level rises during 2019–2021, which could be the result of strong multi-annual variability and sensitivity to the analysed period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.114"/>. To date, no independent observational evidence supports the reported Lake Malawi trend.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS5">
  <label>3.2.5</label><title>Asia</title>
      <p id="d2e4286">Asia contains the largest continental net GWS loss and one of the most extensive significant groundwater-depletion patterns identified in our  analysis. Major depletion regimes extend across Southwest and Central Asia, northern India, the North China Plain, and the Tarim Basin. Localized positive trends occur in western India, the Yangtze and Sichuan basins, parts of central China, and locally across the Tibetan Plateau. The observed continental pattern confirms wide-area groundwater losses, primarily caused by depletion, but also reveals regional contrasts related to groundwater recharge, reservoir-related storage effects, and climate variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx17" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Southwest and Central Asia</title>
      <p id="d2e4295">Significant GWS declines of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, with localized hotspots below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, occur across the Arab–Persian region. Their spatial extent is consistent with previous GRACE-based evidence of groundwater depletion widely attributed to irrigation-driven abstraction under limited recharge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx107" id="paren.115"/>. Countries most affected by negative trends are Saudi Arabia, Iran and Afghanistan. Notably, significant positive TWS and GWS trends occur across large parts of Turkmenistan.  Their co-location coincides with the irrigation-induced regional redistribution of water storage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.116"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4352">Farther north, strong TWS and SWS declines dominate the Caspian and Aral Sea basins. Caspian Sea losses result from increased evaporation and aridification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.117"/>, whereas the Aral Sea signal reflects the long-term effects of irrigation and increasingly dry climatic conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx147" id="paren.118"/>. Significant negative GWS trends around the Aral Sea, locally reaching approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, may indicate groundwater depletion associated with irrigation. Although we observe a spatial separation, their attribution remains uncertain as errors in separating the large SWS signal can propagate into GWS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx18" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>South Asia</title>
      <p id="d2e4387">Northern India forms one of the strongest global GWS-depletion hotspots, with local trends approaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. The spatial pattern is consistent with unsustainable irrigation pumping documented by previous GRACE and groundwater studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx119 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.119"/>. Significant negative GWS tendencies also extend eastward across parts of eastern India and Bangladesh, indicating that the broader depletion pattern is not restricted to the northwestern Indo-Gangetic Basin, contributing to the heterogeneous nature of  observed continental water storage patters.</p>
      <p id="d2e4412">In contrast, positive GWS trends of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> occur near Surat in Gujarat and extend eastward. These trends are broadly consistent with previously reported groundwater refilling in parts of western India and with the influence of monsoon-driven recharge variability and water-management interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.120"/>. South Asia therefore illustrates that significant positive GWS tendencies can occur locally within a region predominantly characterized by depletion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx19" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>East Asia</title>
      <p id="d2e4443">China shows a pronounced spatial contrast in the drivers of significant negative GWS trends. Over the North China Plain and parts of northeastern China, the observed negative significant trend pattern coincides with one of the country's best-documented regions of groundwater over-abstraction, supported by well records, hydrological modelling, and geodetic observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx160" id="paren.121"/>. Significant GWS losses also extend across Xinjiang and the Tarim Basin, where arid conditions, limited recharge, and irrigation-dominated water use stress groundwater storage. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx159" id="text.122"/> reported a slight basin-wide TWS decline and pronounced spatial heterogeneity, but did not isolate the groundwater contribution or attribute the decline specifically to water extraction. In the neighbouring Hexi Corridor, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx137" id="text.123"/> similarly found declining TWS and GWS during 2002–2010, with the strongest losses in the Shiyang River Basin linked to agricultural water use. By contrast, the negative GWS trends in Yunnan and southwestern China are more consistent with drought and climate variability than with the intensive pumping regimes farther north <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx136" id="paren.124"/>. Our results therefore reveal a spatial contrast between well-documented abstraction-related depletion over the North China Plain, irrigation-associated losses in parts of the arid northwest, and declines in Yunnan and southwestern China that are more consistent with drought and climate variability.</p>
      <p id="d2e4458">Positive residual GWS trends occur in the Sichuan Basin, parts of central China, and locally across the Tibetan Plateau. In Sichuan, these positive tendencies broadly coincide with regions where previous GRACE studies reported increasing TWS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx156 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.125"/>. However, neither study independently isolated groundwater storage from the other TWS components. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx156" id="text.126"/> inferred a combined contribution from surface water and groundwater, whereas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.127"/> identified reservoir storage and climatic factors as major controls. The resulting contrast between depletion in northern and western China and positive trends in parts of central and southern China is a prominent feature of the heterogeneous Asian GWS pattern.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx20" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Northern Asia and Arctic Russia</title>
      <p id="d2e4476">Localized significant negative TWS and GWS trends occur over Taymyr and adjacent Kara Sea regions. These signals may reflect hydrological reorganization associated with permafrost degradation, including enhanced groundwater connectivity and discharge. Such responses have been modelled for the Yukon Flats Basin in Alaska <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx145" id="paren.128"/>, but their applicability to Taymyr remains tentative. High-latitude leakage, uncertainties in the representation of snow and surface water, and permafrost processes not explicitly represented by the component models can all influence the GWS estimate.</p>
      <p id="d2e4482">Across northern Russia more broadly, weak-to-moderate negative tendencies are spatially extensive but often not statistically significant. Their non-significance indicates that the apparent drying cannot generally be distinguished reliably from interannual and persistent low-frequency variability over the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSSx21" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Component-level interpretation</title>
      <p id="d2e4491">The component trends emphasize the strong regional contrasts across Asia. RZSM decreases in the Caspian–Aral region, whereas positive tendencies in northern India and northeastern China may reflect irrigation effects or wetter conditions; these interpretations require further investigation. Extensive RZSM drying across the northern Russian tundra and taiga requires further validation; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.129"/> identified northern Russia as a mega-drying region. However, it did not yet affect GWS or TWS trends to be large-scale significant, which also holds for the 95 % significance case (Fig. S7). Also, its interpretation remains uncertain because Arctic soil-moisture is reported to respond regionally heterogeneous and are affected by changing evapotranspiration, permafrost conditions, and surface-water–groundwater connectivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.130"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4500">SWS declines around the Caspian and Aral seas indicate that surface-water loss contributes substantially to the regional TWS decline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx131" id="paren.131"/>. Broad positive SWE tendencies across Siberia are broadly consistent with station observations showing increasing maximum SWE in parts of western and eastern Siberia, although the observation period and spatial coverage differ from those of the present analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.132"/>. Negative SWE trends in the Caucasus and parts of the Central Asian mountains require further  validation. Elevated persistent variability in parts of Central Asia, the Middle East, and China increases trend uncertainties and limits the spatial extent of statistically significant trends (Sect. S2.4). These component signals help interpret TWS patterns but do not change the principal Asian GWS result: widespread groundwater depletion is in contrast to significant regional gains and with areas where variability or component-separation uncertainty prevents a clear attribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS6">
  <label>3.2.6</label><title>Oceania/Australia</title>
      <p id="d2e4517">Australia is characterized by a pronounced wet–dry contrast and strong interannual variability rather than by spatially extensive significant GWS depletion. Previous GRACE-based analyses identify repeated storage gains in the tropical north and northeast and persistent deficits across western and southern Australia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx154" id="paren.133"/>. Our component analysis identifies a mild but significant GWS decline in central-western Australia, consistent with GRACE–model fusion studies indicating groundwater-dominated long-term TWS reductions under persistent rainfall deficits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx154" id="paren.134"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4526">In northern Australia, strong precipitation-driven interannual variability limits the detection of persistent long-term trends. GRACE-derived TWS anomalies in this region are closely related to rainfall and vegetation variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx155" id="paren.135"/>, indicating that episodic wet and dry periods dominate the storage record. The principal finding is therefore not widespread groundwater depletion, but a localized significant GWS decline in central-western Australia embedded within otherwise highly variable and largely non-significant regional patterns.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS7">
  <label>3.2.7</label><title>The role of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA)</title>
      <p id="d2e4540">GIA represents an important source of systematic uncertainty in GRACE/GRACE-FO trend analyses, particularly at northern latitudes and in formerly glaciated regions. Using an ensemble-based framework, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.136"/> demonstrate that in parts of North America and Fennoscandia the magnitude – and, in some localized cases, also the sign – of GRACE-derived TWS trends can depend on the adopted GIA realization. The strongest sensitivities occur around Hudson Bay and northern Quebec, where GIA gravity-rate signals are large and spatially heterogeneous and GIA-related uncertainty can locally exceed several cm yr<sup>−1</sup> equivalent water height.</p>
      <p id="d2e4558">These regions coincide with areas highlighted in our analysis as requiring cautious interpretation, including northern Canada, parts of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Fennoscandia, and the British Isles. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.137"/> show that hydrological trend estimates over large parts of Europe and other mid-latitude regions are comparatively less sensitive to the adopted GIA realization. This indicates that GIA uncertainty is particularly important at northern latitudes and in formerly glaciated regions, whereas most mid-latitude continental patterns are expected to be less strongly affected.</p>
      <p id="d2e4564">Because G3P GWS is derived by component subtraction from TWS, any residual GIA from the GRACE/-FO lower-level processing in TWS propagates directly into the estimated GWS trends. In strongly GIA-affected regions, apparent GWS trends may therefore be biased locally by several mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, potentially affecting both trend magnitude and statistical significance near the detection threshold. Residual GWS trends in the principal GIA-affected regions thus require particular caution because they combine GIA uncertainty with uncertainty from the storage-component separation. Outside these northern-latitude sensitivity regions, the large-scale continental interpretations are less likely to be much affected by GIA uncertainty and remain broadly consistent with independent hydrological evidence.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Rates of change, budgets and 95 % sensitivity</title>
      <p id="d2e4589">Here we present continentally aggregated, area-weighted mean trends and associated volume-change rates derived from G3P grid-cell time series that exhibit statistically significant trends, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. Unless stated otherwise, continental and global balances in this section refer to the sums of grid-cell volume-change rates passing the specified significance threshold. Gross gains and gross losses are reported as positive magnitudes, and the net volume-change rate is calculated as gain minus loss. Significance is assessed separately for TWS and GWS. Greenland and Antarctica are excluded from both aggregations. The primary TWS aggregation domain retains all eligible grid cells, and the primary GWS aggregation domain excludes signals in parts of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago because these strong GWS trends are particularly sensitive to glacier-signal leakage, GIA uncertainty, and potential limitations in the  storage-component models (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>). Consequently, the areas used for the TWS–GWS ratio analysis differ slightly; we assess this sensitivity separately.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Global 99 % aggregates</title>
      <p id="d2e4602">Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> summarise the 99 %-significance-filtered TWS and GWS trend and volume-change statistics by continent and globally.</p>
      <p id="d2e4609">For TWS, the net global volume-change rate over grid cells with significant trends amounts to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183.4 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. The aggregate is dominated by losses in North America (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and Asia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>89.3 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), with smaller net losses in South America (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and Europe (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.1 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). Africa shows a net TWS gain of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4783">For GWS, the corresponding net global volume-change rate is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. This net decline is primarily associated with Asia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.3 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), with smaller net losses in Europe (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), North America (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), and South America (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). These losses are partly compensated for by a substantial net GWS gain in Africa of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. The global gross negative GWS change amounts to 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx2" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Global GWS-to-TWS ratios</title>
      <p id="d2e4984">Using the defined primary aggregation domains, the net negative GWS aggregate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is approximately 14 % of the net negative TWS aggregate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183.4 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, while the gross negative GWS change of 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is approximately 44 % of the corresponding TWS change of 232.1 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. The substantially smaller net than gross GWS-to-TWS ratio reflects compensation between regions of groundwater loss and gain. At the 99 % threshold, significant GWS gains of 76.7 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> compensate for approximately 74 % of the gross GWS loss, whereas significant TWS gains compensate for approximately 21 % of the gross TWS loss. The comparatively small global net GWS decline therefore does not imply uniformly weak groundwater trends, but partly results from compensation between substantial regional losses and gains, particularly the positive GWS aggregate in Africa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx3" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Sensitivity to the spatial domain</title>
      <p id="d2e5115">Because the primary TWS and GWS spatial domains differ slightly, we separately tested the sensitivity of these ratios to the treatment of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Applying the same exclusion mask used for GWS to TWS reduces its net and gross negative changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>144.9 and 193.6 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, yielding corresponding GWS-to-TWS ratios of approximately 18 % and 53 %. Conversely, retaining the excluded Arctic cells in the GWS aggregation increases its net negative and gross negative changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.8 and 112.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Thus, the primary descriptive GWS-to-TWS ratios are approximately 14 % for net loss and 44 % for gross loss, while the artefact-sensitivity analysis yields ratios of approximately 18 %–20 % and 49–53 %, respectively, depending on the treatment of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx4" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Comparison with previous estimates and all-cell results</title>
      <p id="d2e5181">The gross negative significance-filtered GWS change of 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is of the same order of magnitude as earlier model-based estimates of global groundwater depletion of approximately 100–150 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.138"/>. Most of the negative GWS aggregate is concentrated in established groundwater-depletion regions, although climate-driven recharge deficits, drought-related storage changes, permafrost-related processes, and residual component errors contribute locally. Groundwater depletion can itself be intensified by drought through reduced recharge and increased groundwater abstraction, as observed, for example, in the Persian/Iranian region.</p>
      <p id="d2e5229">As a complementary estimate of storage change, we also integrated all retained grid-cell trends without conditioning on statistical significance (Tables S3 and S4). The resulting global gross negative changes are substantially larger, amounting to 469.4 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for TWS and 262.6 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for GWS, corresponding to a gross GWS-to-TWS ratio of approximately 56 %. This all-cell ratio is closer to the 68 % groundwater contribution to TWS loss reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.139"/>, although differences in spatial  domain and methodology remain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx5" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Continental differences</title>
      <p id="d2e5283">The contribution of groundwater to continental TWS change differs strongly among continents, reflecting both the magnitude and spatial compensation of regional GWS trends. At the continental scale, the largest GWS contribution to significant TWS loss occurs in Asia: the net GWS loss is approximately 62 % of the net TWS loss, and the gross GWS loss approximately 70 % of the gross TWS loss. At the 99 % threshold, significant trends cover approximately one fifth of the analysed Asian area for both TWS and GWS. Africa shows the opposite behaviour, with a net GWS gain of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> compared with a net TWS gain of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25.9 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Significant GWS trends cover approximately 29 % of the analysed African area, compared with approximately 22 % for TWS.</p>
      <p id="d2e5343">The relation between TWS and GWS is considerably different on the other continents. In North America, the descriptive net GWS-to-TWS ratio is approximately 4 %, rising to about 8 % when both variables are aggregated over the same geographic domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The comparatively small net GWS loss reflects substantial regional compensation: significant GWS gains of 14.0 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> compensate for most of the gross loss of 17.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Thus, the spatially extensive  groundwater-drying pattern does not yet translate into a comparably large continental net loss. Significant trends cover approximately 21 % of the analysed GWS domain and 17 % of the TWS domain. In Europe, significant GWS trends similarly cover a larger fraction of the analysed domain than TWS trends (approximately 11 % versus 8 %). In South America, in contrast, the significant TWS net loss of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is accompanied by only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> of net significant GWS change. Thus, the continental TWS loss is not accompanied by a corresponding continent-wide groundwater-storage decline.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx6" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>95 % sensitivity</title>
      <p id="d2e5464">Repeating the analysis at the 95 % confidence level using a test threshold of 1.96 (Fig. S7) preserves the principal large-scale TWS and GWS patterns while increasing the spatial extent of trends classified as significant. Globally, the significant TWS area increases from 21.4 to 27.9 million km<sup>2</sup>, corresponding to an expansion of approximately 30 % relative to the 99 % values, while the significant GWS area increases from 24.7 to 33.6 million km<sup>2</sup>, corresponding to a relative expansion of approximately 36 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e5485">The corresponding changes in the integrated volume-change rates are more moderate. The net global TWS loss increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183.4 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>199.7 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (approximately 9 %), and the gross negative TWS change from 232.1 to 264.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (approximately 14 %). The net GWS decline increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31.4 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (approximately 18 %), and the gross negative GWS change from 103.2 to 128.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (approximately 25 %; Tables S1 and S2). At the same time, the magnitude of the global area-weighted mean trend over significant cells decreases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.6 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.2 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> for TWS and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.9 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> for GWS. Thus, lowering the significance threshold primarily expands the detected spatial footprint by accepting a broader set of moderate trends rather than substantially altering the storage-change budgets. This increased sensitivity is also accompanied by the expected rise in the nominal false-positive probability from 1 % to 5 %, while at the same time the risk of missing weaker true trends is reduced.</p>
      <p id="d2e5655">The relative relationships between the global significance-filtered aggregates also change only moderately. The net GWS-to-TWS ratio increases from approximately 14 % to 16 %, while the gross ratio increases from approximately 44 % to 49 %. Compensation between significant gains and losses is likewise stable: at 95 %, GWS gains compensate approximately 76 % of the gross GWS loss, compared with approximately 25 % for TWS, similar to the corresponding 74 % and 21 % values at 99 %. This confirms that the comparatively small net global GWS decline is strongly influenced by compensation between regional groundwater losses and gains.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx7" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Regional changes at 95 %</title>
      <p id="d2e5665">The increase in spatial coverage is particularly evident in Europe. Significant GWS area doubles from 1.1 to 2.2 million km<sup>2</sup>, corresponding to approximately 11 % and 22 % of the analysed European area, respectively. For TWS, the significant area increases from 0.8 to 1.3 million km<sup>2</sup>, or from approximately 8 % to 13 %. Negative GWS trends become more spatially coherent, extending from northeastern Spain across large parts of France into Germany and the Alpine region. The 99 %-significant trends are therefore spatially embedded within a broader moderate negative GWS pattern that becomes apparent when the significance threshold is relaxed.</p>
      <p id="d2e5686">The main continental contrasts remain stable under the lower significance threshold. In Asia, the significant area increases to approximately 26 % of the analysed continental area for both TWS and GWS. The net GWS-to-TWS ratio changes only from approximately 62 % at 99 % to 60 % at 95 %, while the corresponding gross-loss ratio remains nearly unchanged at approximately 70 % and 69 %, respectively. Africa retains positive net TWS and GWS changes, while the significant areas increase from 6.5 to 8.3 million km<sup>2</sup> for TWS (approximately 22 % to 28 % of the analysed area) and from 8.8 to 11.3 million km<sup>2</sup> for GWS (approximately 29 % to 38 %). In North America, the significant-area fractions increase from approximately 17 % to 23 % for TWS and from approximately 21 % to 30 % for GWS. The net significant GWS loss correspondingly increases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.6 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. A similar increase occurs in Europe, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.9 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the much larger Asian net GWS loss changes only moderately from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.3 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. This contrast indicates that the broad moderate drying patterns in North America and Europe are more sensitive to the significance threshold, whereas the major Asian depletion signal is comparatively threshold-stable. In South America, the significant TWS net loss changes only slightly from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.3 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the net significant GWS change remains close to zero.</p>
      <p id="d2e5850">Overall, lowering the significance threshold substantially expands the spatial coverage of detected trends, particularly for GWS and most prominently in Europe, while producing only moderate changes in the integrated storage budgets. The principal continental contrasts – strong and threshold-stable groundwater losses in Asia, compensating groundwater gains in Africa, increasingly coherent moderate GWS drying in Europe, and substantial South American TWS losses without a corresponding continent-wide GWS decline – are preserved. The main spatial patterns and continental-scale volume estimates therefore change little with the selected significance threshold, while the absolute global GWS-to-TWS ratios change little depending on how the artefact-prone Canadian Arctic Archipelago is treated.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Assessment of trend significance and model evaluation</title>
      <p id="d2e5863">To examine how trend magnitude and stochastic variability jointly determine trend significance, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> shows the estimated GWS trend against its standard deviation for each time-series cluster identified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. Gray-shaded regions denote trends classified as statistically significant, and logarithmic axes are used to improve visibility.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5872">GWS trend magnitude versus trend standard deviation for each time-series cluster identified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. Each dot represents one grid cell; gray-shaded regions denote statistically significant trends. Logarithmic axes are used for better visibility.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5883">The two globally dominant background-variability clusters (clusters 0 and 1; purple and blue) are largely characterized by non-significant trends (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>, top panels). The same applies to the Amazon high-amplitude seasonality cluster (cluster 5; red), where strong seasonal, interannual, and persistent low-frequency variability produces large trend uncertainties. In contrast, the strong-decline/cryosphere-adjacent cluster (cluster 4; orange), which includes Arctic regions and parts of India, is dominated by significant negative trends with comparatively limited scatter. The positive-GWS-tendency cluster (cluster 3; green) contains spatially widespread groundwater increases across several continents, of which approximately half reach statistical significance. Statistical significance does not, however, lead to unambiguous physical interpretation. This is particularly important for significant residual GWS trends in Arctic and cryosphere-adjacent regions, where leakage, GIA uncertainty, and errors in the modelled storage components can affect the estimated signal.</p>
      <p id="d2e5889">To investigate the transition between significant and non-significant trends in more detail, we focus on the moderate-GWS-drying cluster (cluster 2; turquoise; top-right panel of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>), which contains comparable numbers of significant and non-significant time series. Similar to the positive-GWS-tendency cluster, cluster 2 exhibits a similar distribution of trend magnitudes, but with greater variation in trend uncertainty associated with interannual and persistent low-frequency variability. The cluster predominantly contains small-to-moderate negative GWS trends and is therefore well suited for illustrating the sensitivity of significance classification to both trend magnitude and residual variability. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a shows its spatial distribution, with crosses marking grid cells whose trends are not statistically significant.</p>
      <p id="d2e5896">To select spatially coherent examples of significant and non-significant time series, we further group the cluster 2 series using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means, now based on binary trend significance and demeaned geographic latitude and longitude, with all features standardized. We use seven sub-clusters, which provide a practical balance between spatial coherence and interpretability. Because significance is itself included as a clustering feature, this grouping is intended to support visualization and comparison of tradeoffs between significant and non-significant clusters.</p>
      <p id="d2e5906">The spatial distribution of the resulting sub-clusters is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b, and representative time series are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>. In each panel, the upper series shows the observations after removal of the fitted periodic components for visual clarity, while the lower series shows the residuals from the complete parametric model fit. The panels in the left column show the time series of the significant trend clusters, the panels on the right column show the non-significant clusters.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e5915"><bold>(a)</bold> Spatial distribution of GWS cluster 2 from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>; crosses indicate grid cells with non-significant trends. <bold>(b)</bold> Sub-clustering based on binary trend significance and geographic location, used to select spatially coherent examples of significant and non-significant time series.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e5933">Representative time series corresponding to the sub-clustering of GWS cluster 2 shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b. The left panels show significant sub-clusters and the right panels non-significant sub-clusters. Observations after removal of the fitted periodic components are shown above the corresponding model residuals.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6789/2026/hess-30-6789-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5945">Comparison of the representative significant and non-significant time series in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/> illustrates systematic differences in both trend magnitude and residual variability. Significant trends range from approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas the selected non-significant trends are generally weaker, ranging from approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.1 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.1 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>. The significant examples also exhibit less residual variability, while stronger interannual and persistent low-frequency variations obscure the linear component in the non-significant examples.</p>
      <p id="d2e6003">In several cases, low-frequency residual variations are comparable to or larger than the fitted linear change. Some time series additionally exhibit weak non-linear behaviour, including slight positive tendencies before approximately 2007. These examples illustrate that trend significance depends jointly on the magnitude of the fitted trend and the stochastic properties of the time series; relatively large apparent trends may remain non-significant when persistent variability produces correspondingly large trend uncertainties.</p>
      <p id="d2e6006">Further evaluations include comparison of the empirical residual spectra with the fitted stochastic models and an assessment of the sensitivity of GWS trends to the treatment of temporal covariance using OLS and GLS (Sect. S2.6 “Model evaluation and trend sensitivity”). The fitted stochastic models reproduce the low- and intermediate-frequency empirical residual spectra well, including the frequencies most relevant for trend uncertainty. Compared with OLS, GLS yields a slightly narrower and more negative GWS trend distribution and global mean and median shifts of approximately 0.3–0.4 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>, which indicates the sensitivity to proper covariance modelling. By accounting explicitly for temporal covariance, GLS provides more reliable trend estimates in the presence of persistent interannual variability and is less susceptible to such variability influencing the fitted linear trend, as particularly evident in the latitude-dependent comparison of Fig. S9, e.g., for South America.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6024">Summary of the main findings on G3P GWS and TWS trends for 2002–2023.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Region/scale</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Main findings</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Global</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– At 99 %, net and gross negative GWS changes are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 and 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to approximately 14 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">and 44 % of the primary TWS aggregates. At 95 %, the corresponding ratios are approximately 16 % and 49 %.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Lowering the significance threshold from 99 % to 95 % expands significant area by approximately 30 % for TWS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">and 36 % for GWS, while net-loss magnitudes increase by only approximately 9 % and 18 %, respectively.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Regional gains offset approximately 74 %–76 % of gross GWS losses, compared with 21 %–25 % for TWS;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">the relatively small net global GWS decline therefore masks substantial regional gains and losses.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– The significance-filtered gross negative GWS change is of the same order as previous model-based</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">groundwater-depletion estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.140"/>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Groundwater losses extend across western and central Canada, the High Plains, the southwestern United States, and</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">northern Mexico, whereas positive tendencies occur in eastern Canada and around the Great Lakes. Regional gains</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">compensate for most gross GWS losses, while cryospheric contributions strongly affect the continental TWS budget.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">South America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Significant GWS losses are concentrated in parts of the northern Altiplano, while persistent interannual variability</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">limits trend detection across much of the continent. The significant continental TWS loss is</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">not accompanied by a corresponding continent-wide GWS decline.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– A broad but mostly moderate GWS drying tendency extends across Europe, with significant negative trends at 99 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentrated in eastern France, northeastern Spain, and southern Ukraine.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Moderate negative GWS tendencies become substantially more spatially coherent at 95 %; significant GWS area</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">doubles from 1.1 to 2.2 million km<sup>2</sup>. The considerably stronger continental TWS aggregate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">reflects contributions beyond groundwater.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Africa</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Strong regional contrasts occur between losses in northern Africa and gains across the Sahel, Niger Basin,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">and parts of central and eastern Africa. Africa exhibits the largest continental net GWS gain;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">much of the positive storage signal is consistent with increased precipitation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">and recharge and compensates groundwater losses elsewhere.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Asia exhibits the largest continental net GWS loss, with extensive depletion across Southwest and Central Asia,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">northern India, northern China, Xinjiang, and the Tarim Basin.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– China shows pronounced regional contrasts between abstraction-related depletion in the North China Plain,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">irrigation-associated losses in the arid northwest, climate-related declines in the southwest, and positive</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">trends in parts of central and southern China.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– The continental drying signal changes little with the significance threshold: net GWS-to-TWS ratios are approximately</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62 % and 60 %, and gross-loss ratios approximately 70 % and 69 %, at 99 % and 95 %, respectively.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oceania/Australia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Significant GWS trends remain localized, including losses in central-western Australia; strong precipitation-driven</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">interannual variability limits long-term trend detection across much of northern Australia.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">General</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– GWS is the dominant individual storage-component signal across most of the analysed spectral range,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">including much of the seasonal-to-interannual variability, whereas glacier mass trends dominate</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">at the lowest frequencies. Negative GWS tendencies are particularly widespread across the Northern Hemisphere,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">especially Canada and Europe, with broadly corresponding RZSM drying tendencies.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Separation of non-groundwater components reduces low-frequency persistence and median trend uncertainty</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">from 3.86 to 2.59 mm yr<sup>−1</sup>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– Trend significance depends jointly on trend magnitude and persistent variability; substantial apparent trends</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">can therefore remain non-significant in variability-dominated regions such as South America.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">– The global pattern is heterogeneous, with neighbouring depletion, gain, and variability-dominated regimes.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion and outlook</title>
      <p id="d2e6478">In this study, we present a globally consistent assessment of terrestrial water storage (TWS) and groundwater storage (GWS) trends using the Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P) and 21.5 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO observations from 2002 to 2023. Trend and periodic signals are estimated for each grid-cell time series together with a calibrated stochastic model of residual temporal covariance, which allows trend uncertainties to account for interannual variability, hydrological memory, and remaining observational noise. This provides significance-filtered continental and global groundwater gain, loss, and net storage-change estimates, complemented by aggregates over all retained grid-cell trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e6481">At the 99 % confidence level, significance-filtered net TWS and GWS changes amount to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183.4 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.5 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, while gross negative changes reach 232.1 and 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Over the spatial aggregation domains, these correspond to descriptive GWS-to-TWS ratios of approximately 14 % for net change and 44 % for gross negative change; artefact-aware sensitivity tests yield approximately 18 %–20 % and 49 %–53 %, respectively. Integrating all retained grid-cell trends increases the gross negative changes to 469.4 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for TWS and 262.6 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> for GWS, corresponding to a gross GWS-to-TWS ratio of approximately 56 %. Net balances additionally mask substantial compensating groundwater gains, particularly in Africa.</p>
      <p id="d2e6583">The principal global, regional, and methodological findings are synthesized in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. Asia accounts for the largest net GWS loss (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>55.3 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), with extensive depletion across Southwest and Central Asia, northern India, the North China Plain, and the Tarim Basin. Africa exhibits the largest compensating GWS gain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), with positive trends from the Sahel and Niger Basin into parts of central and eastern Africa despite continued depletion in northern Africa. Broad groundwater drying is also evident across western and central Canada and Europe, whereas persistent variability limits detection of spatially extensive trends across much of South America. Groundwater depletion can additionally be intensified by drought through reduced recharge and increased abstraction, illustrating coupled climatic and anthropogenic controls. GWS trends in GIA-, cryosphere-, surface-water-, reservoir-, and permafrost-affected regions, such as the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, require particular caution and should not be interpreted as groundwater change from statistical significance alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e6645">Across most of the analysed spectral range, residual GWS shows the largest spectral amplitudes among the individual storage components, including much of the seasonal-to-interannual range, whereas glacier mass dominates trends at  the lowest frequencies. Because GWS is derived by component subtraction, it may also contain TWS errors and variability not represented in the subtracted components. Negative GWS tendencies are particularly widespread across the Northern Hemisphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e6649">Repeating the analysis at the 95 % confidence level preserves the principal spatial and volumetric conclusions. Relative to 99 %, significant area expands by approximately 30 % for TWS and 36 % for GWS, whereas net-loss magnitudes increase by only approximately 9 % and 18 %, respectively. The net GWS-to-TWS ratio changes from approximately 14 % to 16 %, and the gross ratio from 44 % to 49 %. Relaxing the threshold thus primarily expands the spatial extent of detected moderate trends and has only little effect on storage change budgets.</p>
      <p id="d2e6652">Further evaluations show that trend significance depends jointly on trend magnitude and persistent stochastic variability. Power-law-plus-white-noise models reproduce the low- and intermediate-frequency residual spectra governing long-term trend uncertainty. Separation of modelled non-groundwater components generally reduces low-frequency variability and associated stochastic trend uncertainty, improving GWS detectability, but introduces additional uncertainty from the RZSM, SWS, SWE, and glacier-storage products. Accounting for temporal covariance through GLS yields a slightly narrower global GWS trend distribution shifted by approximately 0.3–0.4 mm yr<sup>−1</sup> toward more negative values relative to OLS, with the largest differences in South America. Global water-storage trend estimates therefore remain sensitive to stochastic modelling, product selection, spatial masking, component separation, and significance criteria.</p>
      <p id="d2e6667">Compared with approaches based primarily on deterministic trend fitting or direct TWS interpretation, the framework combines component-resolved groundwater estimation, calibrated temporal-covariance modelling, and significance-aware volumetric aggregation. This allows long-term trends to be distinguished more effectively from persistent hydrological variability and separates trend magnitude, detectability, and uncertainty explicitly.</p>
      <p id="d2e6670">The significance-filtered gross negative GWS change of 103.2 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> is of the same order of magnitude as previous model-based estimates of global groundwater depletion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.141"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. The complementary all-cell integration yields substantially larger gross negative changes and a GWS-to-TWS ratio of approximately 56 %, closer to the 68 % groundwater contribution to TWS loss reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.142"/>. The difference from previous estimates should be interpreted in light of differences in spatial domain, component definition, and aggregation methodology.</p>
      <p id="d2e6702">Future work should improve characterization of the non-groundwater storage components, particularly RZSM, SWS, SWE, and glacier storage, whose errors propagate directly into residual GWS trends. A more complete uncertainty assessment should jointly account for the reduced stochastic uncertainty achieved through component separation and the additional uncertainty introduced by the component products. Improved leakage treatment and GIA corrections remain particularly important in high-latitude and glacier-dominated regions, while systematic differences between spherical-harmonic and mascon TWS products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.143"/> motivate cross-product trend and uncertainty assessments. Spatially correlated uncertainty in aggregated storage-change estimates and field-wide significance across the global grid also warrant further investigation.</p>
      <p id="d2e6708">Independent constraints from hydrological models, in situ groundwater observations, and complementary geodetic measurements such as GNSS and InSAR will be important for separating climatic, anthropogenic, and model-related contributions. Longer records from GRACE-C and subsequent mass-change missions, together with explicit measurement-stability uncertainty concepts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx99" id="paren.144"/> and full use of validated G3P formal uncertainties, should further improve trend detectability and  volumetric change estimates.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6719">The Hector software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.145"/>, used for stochastic time-series modelling and variance component estimation, is publicly available at <uri>https://teromovigo.com/product/hector/</uri> (last access: 22 October 2026). All analyses were performed using this software together with standard scientific Python libraries. The complete statistical framework, including model equations and parameter estimation procedures, is described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6733">The G3P v1.12 dataset used in this study is available from GFZ Data Services at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/g3p.2024.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/g3p.2024.001</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.146"/> and via the GFZ GravIS portal (<uri>https://gravis.gfz.de/gws</uri>, last access: 22 October 2026). The processed TWS and GWS time series and the resulting GLS parameter estimates are archived at Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18538047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18538047</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.147"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e6751">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-6789-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-6789-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6760">Roland Hohensinn (RH): Conceptualization; Methodology; Software; Formal analysis; Investigation; Data curation; Visualization; Writing – original draft; Writing – review and editing. Junyang Gou (JG): Conceptualization; Methodology; Software; Formal analysis; Investigation; Data curation; Visualization; Writing – review and editing. Ulrich Meyer (UM): Investigation; Data curation; Writing – original draft; Writing – review and editing. Laura Jensen (LJ): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Vincent Humphrey (VH): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Wouter Dorigo (WD): Investigation; Data curation; Writing – review and editing. Eva Börgens (EB): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Benedikt Soja (BS): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Alexander Gruber (AGr): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Annette Eicker (AE): Investigation; Writing – review and editing. Michael Rast (MR): Investigation. Andreas Güntner (AGü): Investigation; Data curation; Writing – original draft; Writing – review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6766">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6775">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6781">A part of this study was performed during Roland Hohensinn's scientific visit at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, and Junyang Gou's scientific visit at Bodner Lab, MIT.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6786">The Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P) project received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 870353.The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the GFZ Helmholtz Centre  for Geosciences.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6799">This paper was edited by Christian Massari and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ahmed and Wiese(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Ahmed, M. and Wiese, D. N.: Short-term trends in Africa's freshwater  resources: Rates and drivers, Sci. Total Environ., 695, 133843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133843" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133843</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Albergel et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Albergel, C., De Rosnay, P., Gruhier, C., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Hasenauer, S., Isaksen, L., Kerr, Y., and Wagner, W.: Evaluation of remotely sensed and  modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ  observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 215–226, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Allen and Tett(1999)</label><mixed-citation> Allen, M. R. and Tett, S. F.: Checking for model consistency in optimal  fingerprinting, Clim. Dynam., 15, 419–434, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Amiri-Simkooei et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Amiri-Simkooei, A., Hosseini-Asl, M., Asgari, J., and Zangeneh-Nejad, F.:  Offset detection in GPS position time series using multivariate analysis, GPS Solutions, 23, 1–12, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Anyah et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Anyah, R., Forootan, E., Awange, J. L., and Khaki, M.: Understanding linkages  between global climate indices and terrestrial water storage changes over  Africa using GRACE products, Sci. Total Environ., 635, 1405–1416, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Argus et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Argus, D. F., Martens, H. R., Borsa, A. A., Knappe, E., Wiese, D. N., Alam, S., Anderson, M., Khatiwada, A., Lau, N., Peidou, A., Swarr, M., White, A. M., Bos, M. S., Ellmer, M., Landerer, F. W., and Gardiner, W. P.: Subsurface Water Flux in California's Central Valley and Its Source Watershed From Space Geodesy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099583,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL099583</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Asoka et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Asoka, A., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., and Mishra, V.: Relative contribution of  monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in  India, Nat. Geosci., 10, 109–117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2869" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2869</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Beltaos and Peters(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Beltaos, S. and Peters, D. L.: Effects of regulation on open-water flows in the lower Peace River, Canada, and implications for the recharge of  Peace-Athabasca Delta basins, River Res. Appl., 40, 151–162, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bhanja et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Bhanja, S. N., Mukherjee, A., Rodell, M., Wada, Y., Chattopadhyay, S.,  Velicogna, I., Pangaluru, K., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Groundwater  rejuvenation in parts of India influenced by water-policy change implementation, Scientific Reports, 7, 7453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07058-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-017-07058-2</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bierkens and Wada(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Bierkens, M. F. and Wada, Y.: Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater  depletion: a review, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 063002,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N.,  Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I.,  Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: Detection and  attribution of climate change: from global to regional, in: Climate Change  2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the  Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,  edited by Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,  Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 867–952, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Boergens et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Boergens, E., Güntner, A., Sips, M., Schwatke, C., and Dobslaw, H.: Interannual variations of terrestrial water storage in the East African Rift region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4733–4754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4733-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-28-4733-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Bonsal et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Bonsal, B. R., Peters, D. L., Seglenieks, F., Rivera, A., and Berg, A.: Changes in freshwater availability across Canada, in: Canada's Changing Climate Report, edited by: Bush, E. and Lemmen, D. S., Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 261–342, ISBN 978-0-660-30222-5, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bos et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation> Bos, M., Fernandes, R., Williams, S., and Bastos, L.: Fast error analysis of  continuous GPS observations, J. Geodesy, 82, 157–166, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Bos et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Bos, M., Fernandes, R., and Bastos, L.: Hector user manual version 1.9,  Space &amp; Earth Geodetic Analysis Laboratory (SEGAL), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal,  <uri>https://segal.ubi.pt/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hector_manual_1.9.pdf</uri> (last access: 19 January 2024), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Braun et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Braun, M. H., Malz, P., Sommer, C., Farías-Barahona, D., Sauter, T.,  Casassa, G., Soruco, A., Skvarca, P., and Seehaus, T. C.: Constraining  glacier elevation and mass changes in South America, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 130–136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Bring et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bring, A., Fedorova, I., Dibike, Y., Hinzman, L., Mård, J., Mernild, S. H., Prowse, T., Semenova, O., Stuefer, S. L., and Woo, M.-K.: Arctic terrestrial hydrology: A synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 621–649,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JG003131</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Bulygina et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Bulygina, O. N., Groisman, P. Y., Razuvaev, V. N., and Korshunova, N. N.:  Changes in snow cover characteristics over Northern Eurasia since 1966,  Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 045204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045204" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045204</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Çakan et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Çakan, Ç., Yılmaz, M. T., Dobslaw, H., Ince, E. S., Evrendilek, F., Förste, C., and Yagci, A. L.: Evaluation of globally gridded precipitation data and satellite-based terrestrial water storage products using hydrological drought recovery time, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3359–3377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3359-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-3359-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Cao et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Cao, G., Zheng, C., Scanlon, B. R., Liu, J., and Li, W.: Use of flow modeling  to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain,  Water Resour. Res., 49, 159–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011899" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012WR011899</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Chandanpurkar et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Chandanpurkar, H. A., Famiglietti, J. S., Gopalan, K., Wiese, D. N., Wada, Y., Kakinuma, K., Reager, J. T., and Zhang, F.: Unprecedented continental drying, shrinking freshwater availability, and increasing land contributions to sea level rise, Science Advances, 11, eadx0298, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx0298" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.adx0298</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Chaudhari et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Chaudhari, S., Pokhrel, Y., Moran, E., and Miguez-Macho, G.: Multi-decadal hydrologic change and variability in the Amazon River basin: understanding terrestrial water storage variations and drought characteristics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2841–2862, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2841-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-23-2841-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Chen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Wilson, C., Tapley, B., Longuevergne, L., Yang, Z., and Scanlon, B.: Recent La Plata basin drought conditions observed by satellite gravimetry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D22108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014689</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Chen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J. L., Pekker, T., Wilson, C. R., Tapley, B. D., Kostianoy, A. G.,  Crétaux, J.-F., and Safarov, E. S.: Long-term Caspian Sea level change,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 6993–7001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL073958</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Choulga et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Choulga, M., Moschini, F., Mazzetti, C., Grimaldi, S., Disperati, J., Beck, H., Salamon, P., and Prudhomme, C.: Technical note: Surface fields for global environmental modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2991–3036, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Ciracì et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Ciracì, E., Velicogna, I., and Swenson, S.: Continuity of the mass loss of  the world's glaciers and ice caps from the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On  missions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086926" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL086926</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Cook et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Marvel, K., Williams, A. P., Smerdon, J. E., and  Anchukaitis, K. J.: Twenty-First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6  Forcing Scenarios, Earth's Future, 8, e2019EF001461,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019EF001461</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Cui et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Cui, L., Zhu, C., Wu, Y., Yao, C., Wang, X., An, J., and Wei, P.: Natural-and  human-induced influences on terrestrial water storage change in Sichuan,  Southwest China from 2003 to 2020, Remote Sensing, 14, 1369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061369" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14061369</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Dahle et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Dahle, C., Boergens, E., Sasgen, I., Döhne, T., Reißland, S., Dobslaw, H., Klemann, V., Murböck, M., König, R., Dill, R., Sips, M., Sylla, U., Groh, A., Horwath, M., and Flechtner, F.: GravIS: mass anomaly products from satellite gravimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 611–631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-611-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Dangar et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Dangar, S., Asoka, A., and Mishra, V.: Causes and implications of groundwater  depletion in India: A review, J. Hydrol., 596, 126103,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>de Graaf et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> de Graaf, I. E., van Beek, R. L., Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Schmitz, O.,  Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Bierkens, M. F.: A global-scale two-layer transient  groundwater model: Development and application to groundwater depletion,  Adv. Water Resour., 102, 53–67, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>de Melo and Wendland(2020)</label><mixed-citation>de Melo, D. C. D. and Wendland, E.: Using GRACE to Quantify the Depletion of Terrestrial Water Storage in Northeastern Brazil: The Urucuia Aquifer  System, Sci. Total Environ., 705, 135828,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135828</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Döll et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Döll, P., Müller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T., and Eicker,  A.: Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater  abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well  observations and GRACE satellites, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5698–5720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014WR015595</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Dorigo et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Dorigo, W., Dietrich, S., Aires, F., Brocca, L., Carter, S., Cretaux, J.-F.,  Dunkerley, D., Enomoto, H., Forsberg, R., Güntner, A., Hegglin, M. I.,  Hollmann, R., Hurst, D. F., Johannessen, J. A., Kummerow, C., Lee, T.,  Luojus, K., Looser, U., Miralles, D. G., Pellet, V., Recknagel, T.,  Ruz Vargas, C., Schneider, U., Schoeneich, P., Schröder, M., Tapper, N.,  Vuglinsky, V., Wagner, W., Yu, L., Zappa, L., Zemp, M., and Aich, V.: Closing  the water cycle from observations across scales: Where do we stand?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E1897–E1935, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0316.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0316.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Dubois et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Dubois, E., Larocque, M., Gagné, S., and Braun, M.: Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge in cold and humid climates: Controlling processes and thresholds, Climate, 10, 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10010006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/cli10010006</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Dussaillant et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Dussaillant, I., Bannwart, J., Paul, F., and Zemp, M.: Glacier mass change  global gridded data from 1976 to present derived from the Fluctuations of  Glaciers Database, World Glacier Monitoring Service [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.ba597449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.ba597449</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Eicker et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Eicker, A., Schawohl, L., Middendorf, K., Bagge, M., Jensen, L., and Dobslaw,  H.: Influence of GIA uncertainty on climate model evaluation with GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite gravimetry data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 129, e2023JB027769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB027769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JB027769</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Famiglietti et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Famiglietti, J. S., Lo, M., Ho, S. L., Bethune, J., Anderson, K., Syed, T. H., Swenson, S. C., de Linage, C. R., and Rodell, M.: Satellites measure recent rates of groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L03403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046442</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Fatolazadeh and Goïta(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Fatolazadeh, F. and Goïta, K.: Mapping terrestrial water storage changes  in Canada using GRACE and GRACE-FO, Sci. Total Environ., 779, 146435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146435</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Favreau et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Favreau, G., Cappelaere, B., Massuel, S., Leblanc, M., Boucher, M., Boulain,  N., and Leduc, C.: Land clearing, climate variability, and water resources  increase in semiarid southwest Niger: A review, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00A16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006785</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Felfelani et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Felfelani, F., Wada, Y., Longuevergne, L., and Pokhrel, Y. N.: Natural and  human-induced terrestrial water storage change: A global analysis using  hydrological models and GRACE, J. Hydrol., 553, 105–118, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Feng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Feng, W., Zhong, M., Lemoine, J.-M., Biancale, R., Hsu, H.-T., and Xia, J.:  Evaluation of groundwater depletion in North China using the Gravity  Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and ground-based measurements, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2110–2118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20192</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Franzke(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Franzke, C.: Nonlinear trends, long-range dependence, and climate noise  properties of surface temperature, J. Climate, 25, 4172–4183, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Frappart(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Frappart, F.: Groundwater storage changes in the major North African  transboundary aquifer systems during the GRACE era (2003–2016), Water, 12,  2669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12102669</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Frappart and Ramillien(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Frappart, F. and Ramillien, G.: Monitoring Groundwater Storage Changes Using  the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Satellite Mission: A  Review, Remote Sensing, 10, 829, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060829" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10060829</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Fraser et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Fraser, R. H., Kokelj, S. V., Lantz, T. C., McFarlane-Winchester, M., Olthof,  I., and Lacelle, D.: Climate sensitivity of high Arctic permafrost terrain  demonstrated by widespread ice-wedge thermokarst on Banks Island, Remote  Sensing, 10, 954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10060954</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Frederikse et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey,  V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., and Wu, Y.-H.: The  causes of sea-level rise since 1900, Nature, 584, 393–397,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Gafurov et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Gafurov, A., Selyuzhenok, V., Latinovic, M., Apel, H., Mamaraimov, A.,  Salokhiddinov, A., Boergens, E., and Güntner, A.: GRACE observes the  natural and irrigation-induced regional redistribution of water storage in  Central Asia, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 56, 101994,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101994</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>García-Sanz et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>García-Sanz, I., Heine-Fuster, I., Luque, J. A., Pizarro, H., Castillo, R., Pailahual, M., Prieto, M., Pérez-Portilla, P., and Aránguiz-Acuña, A: Limnological Response from High-Altitude Wetlands  to the Water Supply in the Andean Altiplano, Scientific Reports, 11, 7681, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87162-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-87162-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Gardner et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Wouters, B., Wolken, G. J., Burgess, D. O., Sharp, M. J., Cogley, J. G., Braun, C., and Labine, C.: Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Nature, 473, 357–360, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature10089</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Gbetkom et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Gbetkom, P. G., Crétaux, J.-F., Biancamaria, S., Blazquez, A., Paris, A.,  Tchilibou, M., Gal, L., Kitambo, B., Oliveira, R. A. J., and Gosset, M.: Lake Tanganyika basin water storage variations from 2003–2021 for water balance and flood monitoring, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 34, 101182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Gobron et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Gobron, K., Rebischung, P., de Viron, O., Demoulin, A., and Van Camp, M.:  Impact of offsets on assessing the low-frequency stochastic properties of  geodetic time series, J. Geodesy, 96, 46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01634-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-022-01634-9</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Gobron et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Gobron, K., Hohensinn, R., Loizeau, X., Bulgin, C. E., Merchant, C. J.,  Woolliams, E. R., Cox, M. G., Dorigo, W., Howard, T., Langsdale, M., Povey,  A. C., Ablain, M., Bogusz, J., Gruber, A., Klos, A., and Mittaz, J.: A  Unified Framework for Trend Uncertainty Assessment in Climate Data Records:  Demonstration on Global Mean Sea Level, Surv. Geophys.,  online first, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-025-09922-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-025-09922-7</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Goncalves et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Goncalves, J., Petersen, J., Deschamps, P., Hamelin, B., and Baba-Sy, O.:  Quantifying the modern recharge of the “fossil” Sahara aquifers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2673–2678, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Gonzales et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Gonzales, L., López, V., Huamán, D., Villalobos, C., Espinoza, R., Vega, M.,  and Ramos, J.: Two Decades of Groundwater Variability in Peru Using  Satellite Gravimetry Data, Appl. Sci., 15, 8071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/app15148071</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Gronewold and Rood(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Gronewold, A. D. and Rood, R. B.: Recent water level changes across Earth's largest lake system and implications for future variability, J. Great Lakes Res., 45, 1–3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jglr.2018.10.012</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Gunes and Aydin(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Gunes, O. and Aydin, C.: Colored noise in GRACE total water storage time  series: Its impact on trend significance in the Türkiye region and  major world river basins, Adv. Space Res., 74, 1633–1647,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.051</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Güntner et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Güntner, A., Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Cao, F., Dahle, C., Darbeheshti, N., Dobslaw, H., Dussaillant, I., Dorigo, W., Flechtner, F., Jäggi, A., Kosmale, M., Lasser, M., Luojus, K., Meyer, U., Pasik, A., Preimersberger, W., Ruz Vargas, C., and Zemp, M.: The Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P), Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-2025-797</ext-link>, in review, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Güntner et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Güntner, A., Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H.,  Dorigo, W., Dussailant, I., Flechtner, F., Jäggi, A., Kosmale, M., Luojus,  K., Mayer-Gürr, T., Meyer, U., Preimesberger, W., Ruz Vargas, C., and Zemp,  M.: Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P) V.1.12, GFZ Data Services [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5880/g3p.2024.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5880/g3p.2024.001</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Haacker et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Haacker, E. M., Kendall, A. D., and Hyndman, D. W.: Water level declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to resource senescence, Groundwater,  54, 231–242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gwat.12350</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Hamdi and Goïta(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Hamdi, M. and Goïta, K.: Analysis of groundwater depletion in the  saskatchewan river basin in Canada from coupled SWAT-MODFLOW and  satellite gravimetry, Hydrology, 10, 188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10090188" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/hydrology10090188</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Hasselmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation> Hasselmann, K.: Multi-pattern fingerprint method for detection and attribution of climate change, Clim. Dynam., 13, 601–611, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Hirschi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Hirschi, M., Stradiotti, P., Crezee, B., Dorigo, W., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Potential of long-term satellite observations and reanalysis products for characterising soil drying: trends and drought events, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 397–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-397-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-397-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Hoell et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Hoell, A., Gaughan, A. E., Shukla, S., and Magadzire, T.: The hydrologic  effects of synchronous El Niño–Southern oscillation and subtropical  Indian ocean dipole events over Southern Africa, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2407–2424, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Hohensinn(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Hohensinn, R.: Parameter estimates for GRACE/GRACE-FO TWS and GWS trend analysis (G3P, 2002–2023), Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18538047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18538047</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Hohensinn et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Hohensinn, R., Ruttner, P., and Bock, Y.: Sensitivity of GNSS to vertical  land motion over Europe: effects of geophysical loadings and common-mode  errors, J. Geodesy, 98, 68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Huang et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, J., Halpenny, J., Van Der Wal, W., Klatt, C., James, T., and Rivera, A.: Detectability of groundwater storage change within the Great Lakes Water  Basin using GRACE, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B08401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008876" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008876</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Huang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Q., Wang, P., Wang, R., Yu, J., Frolova, N. L., and Pozdniakov, S. P.:  Differential decline in terrestrial water storage across major  permafrost-dominated Arctic River basins during the rapid warming period  from 1981 to 2020, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042978</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Humphrey and Gudmundsson(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Humphrey, V. and Gudmundsson, L.: GRACE-REC: a reconstruction of climate-driven water storage changes over the last century, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1153–1170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1153-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-11-1153-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Humphrey et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Humphrey, V., Gudmundsson, L., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Assessing global water  storage variability from GRACE: Trends, seasonal cycle, subseasonal  anomalies and extremes, Surv. Geophys., 37, 357–395,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9367-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-016-9367-1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Humphrey et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Humphrey, V., Gudmundsson, L., and Seneviratne, S. I.: A globalreconstruction  of climate-driven subdecadal water storage variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2300–2309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL072564</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Jackson et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Jackson, C. R., Bloomfield, J. P., and Mackay, J. D.: Evidence for changes in  historic and future groundwater levels in the UK, Prog. Phys. Geog., 39, 49–67, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Jäggi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Jäggi, A., Meyer, U., Lasser, M., Jenny, B., Lopez, T., Flechtner, F., Dahle, C., Förste, C., Mayer-Gürr, T., Kvas, A., Lemoine, J.-M., Bourgogne, S., Weigelt, M., and Groh, A.: International Combination Service for Time-Variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) – Start of Operational Phase and  Future Perspectives, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 152,  57–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/1345_2020_109</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Jarugula and McPhaden(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Jarugula, S. and McPhaden, M. J.: Indian Ocean Dipole affects eastern  tropical Atlantic salinity through Congo River Basin hydrology,  Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 4, 366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01027-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-023-01027-6</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Jasechko et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Jasechko, S., Seybold, H., Perrone, D., Fan, Y., Shamsudduha, M., Taylor,  R. G., Fallatah, O., and Kirchner, J. W.: Rapid groundwater decline and some  cases of recovery in aquifers globally, Nature, 625, 715–721, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Jensen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation> Jensen, L., Eicker, A., Dobslaw, H., Stacke, T., and Humphrey, V.: Long-term  wetting and drying trends in land water storage derived from GRACE and CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9808–9823, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Jiang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, Y., Zhou, L., Roundy, P. E., Hua, W., and Raghavendra, A.: Increasing influence of Indian Ocean dipole on precipitation over central equatorial Africa, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092370</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Joodaki et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Joodaki, G., Wahr, J., and Swenson, S.: Estimating the human contribution to  groundwater depletion in the Middle East, from GRACE data, land surface  models, and well observations, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2679–2692, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Kayastha et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Kayastha, M. B., Ye, X., Huang, C., and Xue, P.: Future rise of the Great  Lakes water levels under climate change, J. Hydrol., 612, 128205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128205" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128205</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Kirshen et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Kirshen, A. B., Moran, B. J., Munk, L. A., Russo, A. A., McKnight, S. V.,  Jenckes, J., Corkran, D. B., Bresee, M., and Boutt, D. F.: Freshwater inflows  to closed basins of the Andean plateau in Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 6, 177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02130-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-025-02130-6</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Knief and Forstmeier(2021)</label><mixed-citation> Knief, U. and Forstmeier, W.: Violating the normality assumption may be the  lesser of two evils, Behav. Res. Methods, 53, 2576–2590, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Konikow(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Konikow, L. F.: Long-term groundwater depletion in the United States, Groundwater, 53, 2–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gwat.12306</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Koscielny-Bunde et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Koscielny-Bunde, E., Kantelhardt, J. W., Braun, P., Bunde, A., and Havlin, S.: Long-term persistence and multifractality of river runoff records: Detrended fluctuation studies, J. Hydrol., 322, 120–137,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.004</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Koutsoyiannis(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Koutsoyiannis, D.: Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological  statistics, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 3–24, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Kvas et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Kvas, A., Boergens, E., Dobslaw, H., Eicker, A., Mayer-Guerr, T., and  Güntner, A.: Evaluating long-term water storage trends in small  catchments and aquifers from a joint inversion of 20 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO mission data, Geophys. J. Int., 236, 1002–1012, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Lai et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Lai, E. N., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Virkki, V., Porkka, M., and van der Ent, R. J.: Root zone soil moisture in over 25 % of global land permanently beyond pre-industrial variability as early as 2050 without climate policy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3999–4018, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3999-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-27-3999-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Landerer et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Landerer, F. W., Flechtner, F. M., Save, H., Webb, F. H., Bandikova, T.,  Bertiger, W. I., Bettadpur, S. V., Byun, S. H., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H.,  Fahnestock, E., Harvey, N., Kang, Z., Kruizinga, G. L. H., Loomis, B. D.,  McCullough, C., Murböck, M., Nagel, P., Paik, M., Pie, N., Poole, S.,  Strekalov, D., Tamisiea, M. E., Wang, F., Watkins, M. M., Wen, H.-Y., Wiese,  D. N., and Yuan, D.-N.: Extending the global mass change data record: GRACE  Follow-On instrument and science data performance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL088306</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Lewkowicz and Way(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Lewkowicz, A. G. and Way, R. G.: Extremes of summer climate trigger thousands  of thermokarst landslides in a High Arctic environment, Nat. Commun., 10, 1329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09314-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-09314-7</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Li and Rodell(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Li, B. and Rodell, M.: Terrestrial water storage in 2023, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 5, 247–249, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Li, J., Wang, S., and Zhou, F.: Time series analysis of long-term terrestrial  water storage over Canada from GRACE satellites using principal component  analysis, Can. J. Remote Sens., 42, 161–170,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1166042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07038992.2016.1166042</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Li and Zhang(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Li, Z. and Zhang, Y.-K.: Quantifying fractal dynamics of groundwater systems  with detrended fluctuation analysis, J. Hydrol., 336, 139–146, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Lin et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, H., Cheng, X., Zheng, L., Peng, X., Feng, W., and Peng, F.: Recent changes in groundwater and surface water in large pan-arctic river basins, Remote Sensing, 14, 607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030607" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14030607</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Little and Bloomfield(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Little, M. A. and Bloomfield, J. P.: Robust evidence for random fractal scaling of groundwater levels in unconfined aquifers, J. Hydrol., 393,  362–369, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Lucas et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Lucas, M. C., Kublik, N., Rodrigues, D. B. B., Meira Neto, A. A., Almagro, A., de Melo, D. C. D., Zipper, S. C., and de Oliveira, P. T. S.: Significant  Baseflow Reduction in the São Francisco River Basin, Water, 13,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w13010002</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Luojus et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Luojus, K., Pulliainen, J., Takala, M., Lemmetyinen, J., Mortimer, C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Moisander, M., Hiltunen, M., Smolander, T., Ikonen, J., Cohen, J., Salminen, M., Norberg, J., Veijola, K., and Venäläinen, P.:  GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset, Scientific Data, 8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>MacQueen(1967)</label><mixed-citation> MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate  observations, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical  Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, University of California Press, 5, 281–298, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><label>Mandelbrot and Wallis(1969)</label><mixed-citation> Mandelbrot, B. B. and Wallis, J. R.: Some long-run properties of geophysical  records, Water Resour. Res., 5, 321–340, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><label>Merchant et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Merchant, C. J., Paul, F., Popp, T., Ablain, M., Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Hollmann, R., Lavergne, T., Laeng, A., de Leeuw, G., Mittaz, J., Poulsen, C., Povey, A. C., Reuter, M., Sathyendranath, S., Sandven, S., Sofieva, V. F., and Wagner, W.: Uncertainty information in climate data records from Earth observation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 511–527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-511-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-511-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Merchant et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Merchant, C. J., Woolliams, E. R., Dorigo, W., Bulgin, C. E., Gobron, K.,  Hohensinn, R., Loizeau, X., and Tynan, C. P. J.: Stability specifications for  climate data records: their meaning and application in evaluating geophysical  trend uncertainty, Surv. Geophys., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09941-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-026-09941-y</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Meyer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Meyer, U., Lasser, M., Dahle, C., Förste, C., Behzadpour, S., Koch, I., and Jäggi, A.: Combined monthly GRACE-FO gravity fields for a Global  Gravity-based Groundwater Product, Geophys. J. Int., 236,  456–469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/gji/ggad437</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>Montillet and Bos(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Montillet, J.-P. and Bos, M. S.: Geodetic time series analysis in earth  sciences, Springer, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21718-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-030-21718-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>Mudelsee(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Mudelsee, M.: Climate Time Series Analysis: Classical Statistical and Bootstrap Methods, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7</ext-link>, ISBN 978-90-481-9482-7, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Mudelsee(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Mudelsee, M.: Trend analysis of climate time series: A review of methods,  Earth-Sci. Rev., 190, 310–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.005</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>Muskett and Romanovsky(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Muskett, R. R. and Romanovsky, V. E.: Alaskan permafrost groundwater storage  changes derived from GRACE and ground measurements, Remote Sensing, 3,  378–397, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3020378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs3020378</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Naumann et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Naumann, G., Podesta, G., Marengo, J., Luterbacher, J., Bavera, D., Acosta Navarro, J., Arias-Muñoz, C., Barbosa, P., Cammalleri, C., Cuartas Luz, A., De Estrada, M., De Felice, M., De Jager, A., Escobar, C., Fioravanti, G., Giordano, L., Hrast Essenfelder, A., Hidalgo, C., Leal De Moraes, O. L., Maetens, W., Magni, D., Masante, D., Mazzeschi, M., Osman, M., Rossi, L., Seluchi, M., De Los Milagros Skansi, M., Spennemann, P., Spinoni, J., Toreti, A., and Vera, C.: Extreme and Long-Term Drought in the La Plata Basin: Event Evolution and Impact Assessment until September 2022, Technical Report JRC132245, Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Luxembourg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2760/62557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2760/62557</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><label>Ni et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Ni, S., Chen, J., Wilson, C. R., Li, J., Hu, X., and Fu, R.: Global terrestrial water storage changes and connections to ENSO events, Surv. Geophys., 39, 1–22, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Nikraftar et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Nikraftar, Z., Parizi, E., Saber, M., Hosseini, S. M., Ataie-Ashtiani, B., and Simmons, C. T.: Groundwater sustainability assessment in the Middle East using GRACE/GRACE-FO data, Hydrogeol. J., 32, 321–337, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Noël et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Noël, B., van de Berg, W. J., Machguth, H., Lhermitte, S., Howat, I.,  Fettweis, X., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Six Decades of Glacial Mass Loss in  the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 123, 1430–1449, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004304" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JF004304</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Orth and Seneviratne(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Orth, R. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Analysis of soil moisture memory from  observations in Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017366</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Orth et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Orth, R., Staudinger, M., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Inferring Soil Moisture  Memory from Streamflow Observations Using a Simple Water Balance Model, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 1773–1790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-099.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-12-099.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><label>Otosaka et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Otosaka, I. N., Shepherd, A., Ivins, E. R., Schlegel, N.-J., Amory, C., van den Broeke, M. R., Horwath, M., Joughin, I., King, M. D., Krinner, G., Nowicki, S., Payne, A. J., Rignot, E., Scambos, T., Simon, K. M., Smith, B. E., Sørensen, L. S., Velicogna, I., Whitehouse, P. L., A, G., Agosta, C., Ahlstrøm, A. P., Blazquez, A., Colgan, W., Engdahl, M. E., Fettweis, X., Forsberg, R., Gallée, H., Gardner, A., Gilbert, L., Gourmelen, N., Groh, A., Gunter, B. C., Harig, C., Helm, V., Khan, S. A., Kittel, C., Konrad, H., Langen, P. L., Lecavalier, B. S., Liang, C.-C., Loomis, B. D., McMillan, M., Melini, D., Mernild, S. H., Mottram, R., Mouginot, J., Nilsson, J., Noël, B., Pattle, M. E., Peltier, W. R., Pie, N., Roca, M., Sasgen, I., Save, H. V., Seo, K.-W., Scheuchl, B., Schrama, E. J. O., Schröder, L., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Spada, G., Sutterley, T. C., Vishwakarma, B. D., van Wessem, J. M., Wiese, D., van der Wal, W., and Wouters, B.: Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1597–1616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1597-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-1597-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx112"><label>Pasik et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Pasik, A., Gruber, A., Preimesberger, W., De Santis, D., and Dorigo, W.: Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4957–4976, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Patterson and Thompson(1971)</label><mixed-citation> Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R.: Recovery of inter-block information when  block sizes are unequal, Biometrika, 58, 545–554, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Pfeffer et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation> Pfeffer, J., Cazenave, A., and Barnoud, A.: Analysis of the interannual variability in satellite gravity solutions: detection of climate modes fingerprints in water mass displacements across continents and oceans, Clim. Dynam., 58, 1065–1084, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Pokhrel et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Pokhrel, Y., Felfelani, F., Satoh, Y., Boulange, J., Burek, P., Gädeke, A., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Grillakis, M., Gudmundsson, L., Hanasaki, N.,  Kim, H., Koutroulis, A., Liu, J., Papadimitriou, L., Schewe, J.,  Müller Schmied, H., Stacke, T., Telteu, C.-E., Thiery, W., Veldkamp, T.,  Zhao, F., and Wada, Y.: Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity  under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 226–233,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Preimesberger et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Preimesberger, W., Stradiotti, P., and Dorigo, W.: ESA CCI Soil Moisture GAPFILLED: an independent global gap-free satellite climate data record with uncertainty estimates, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4305–4329, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4305-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-4305-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Richey et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Richey, A. S., Thomas, B. F., Lo, M.-H., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S.,  Voss, K., Swenson, S., and Rodell, M.: Quantifying renewable groundwater  stress with GRACE, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5217–5238,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015WR017349</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Riva et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Riva, R. E., Bamber, J. L., Lavallée, D. A., and Wouters, B.: Sea-level  fingerprint of continental water and ice mass change from GRACE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044770" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL044770</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx119"><label>Rodell et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Satellite-based estimates  of groundwater depletion in India, Nature, 460, 999–1002,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature08238</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx120"><label>Rodell et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J. S., Wiese, D. N., Reager, J., Beaudoing, H. K.,  Landerer, F. W., and Lo, M.-H.: Emerging trends in global freshwater  availability, Nature, 557, 651–659, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx121"><label>Roe(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Roe, G. H.: What do glaciers tell us about climate variability and climate  change?, J. Glaciol., 57, 567–578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796905640" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/002214311796905640</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx122"><label>Saito et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Saito, Y. K., Justino, F., Gurjão, C. D., Zita, L., Paixão, P., and  Ramiro, Í.: Soil Moisture Dynamics in South America: A Multi-Dataset  Analysis From 1990 to 2020, Int. J. Climatol., 45, e70047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.70047</ext-link>,  2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx123"><label>Satizábal-Alarcón et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Satizábal-Alarcón, D. A., Suhogusoff, A., and Ferrari, L. C.:  Characterization of groundwater storage changes in the Amazon River Basin  based on downscaling of GRACE/GRACE-FO data with machine learning models,  Sci. Total Environ., 912, 168958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168958</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx124"><label>Scanlon et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Scanlon, B. R., Faunt, C. C., Longuevergne, L., Reedy, R. C., Alley, W. M.,  McGuire, V. L., and McMahon, P. B.: Groundwater depletion and sustainability  of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley, P. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 109, 9320–9325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200311109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1200311109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx125"><label>Scanlon et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Save, H., Wiese, D. N., Landerer, F. W., Long, D., Longuevergne, L., and Chen, J.: Global evaluation of new GRACE mascon  products for hydrologic applications, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9412–9429, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019494" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019494</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx126"><label>Scanlon et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Save, H., Sun, A. Y., Müller Schmied, H., van  Beek, L. P. H., Wiese, D. N., Wada, Y., Long, D., Reedy, R. C., Longuevergne,  L., Döll, P., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global models underestimate large  decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite  data, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E1080–E1089,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704665115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1704665115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx127"><label>Schilling et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Schilling, J., Hertig, E., Tramblay, Y., and Scheffran, J.: Climate change  vulnerability, water resources and social implications in North Africa, Reg. Environ. Change, 20, 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01597-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10113-020-01597-7</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx128"><label>Shalby et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Shalby, A., Emara, S. R., Metwally, M. I., Armanuos, A. M., El-Agha, D. E.,  Negm, A. M., and Gado, T. A.: Satellite-based estimates of groundwater  storage depletion over Egypt, Environ. Monit. Assess., 195, 594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11171-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-023-11171-3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx129"><label>Sharifi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Dobslaw, H., and Güntner, A.: Technical note: GRACE-compatible filtering of water storage data sets via spatial autocorrelation analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 6985–6998, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6985-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-6985-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx130"><label>Shrestha et al.(2012)Shrestha, Dibike, and Prowse</label><mixed-citation> Shrestha, R. R., Dibike, Y. B., and Prowse, T. D.: Modelling of climate-induced hydrologic changes in the Lake Winnipeg watershed, J. Great Lakes Res., 38, 83–94, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx131"><label>Singh et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, A., Seitz, F., and Schwatke, C.: Inter-annual water storage changes in  the Aral Sea from multi-mission satellite altimetry, optical remote sensing, and GRACE satellite gravimetry, Remote Sens. Environ., 123, 187–195, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx132"><label>Sospedra-Alfonso et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Merryfield, W. J., and Kharin, V. V.: Representation of  Snow in the Canadian Seasonal to Interannual Prediction System. Part II:  Potential Predictability and Hindcast Skill, J. Hydrometeorol., 17,  2511–2535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0027.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-16-0027.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx133"><label>Spinoni et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Carrao, H., Barbosa, P., and Vogt, J.: World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 2792–2804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3875</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx134"><label>Spinoni et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Vogt, J., and Barbosa, P.: Meteorological droughts in Europe: events and impacts-past trends and future projections, Publications Office of the European Union, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2788/450449" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2788/450449</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx135"><label>Springer et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Springer, A., Lopez, T., Owor, M., Frappart, F., and Stieglitz, T.: The role  of space-based observations for groundwater resource monitoring over Africa, Surv. Geophys., 44, 123–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09759-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-022-09759-4</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx136"><label>Tang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Tang, J., Cheng, H., and Liu, L.: Assessing the recent droughts in Southwestern China using satellite gravimetry, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3030–3038, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx137"><label>Tangdamrongsub et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Tangdamrongsub, N., Steele-Dunne, S. C., Gunter, B. C., Ditmar, P. G., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Sun, Y., Xia, T., and Wang, Z.: Improving estimates of water resources in a semi-arid region by assimilating GRACE data into the PCR-GLOBWB hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2053–2074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2053-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-2053-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx138"><label>Tapley et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J. C., Thompson, P. F., and Watkins, M. M.: GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system, Science, 305, 503–505, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx139"><label>Thomas et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Thomas, B. F., Famiglietti, J. S., Landerer, F. W., Wiese, D. N., Molotch,  N. P., and Argus, D. F.: GRACE Groundwater Drought Index: Evaluation of  California Central Valley groundwater drought, Remote Sens. Environ., 198, 384–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.026</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx140"><label>Van Der Knijff et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation> Van Der Knijff, J., Younis, J., and De Roo, A.: LISFLOOD: a GIS-based  distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation,  Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 24, 189–212, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx141"><label>Velicogna(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Velicogna, I.: Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and  Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040222" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040222</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx142"><label>Vishwakarma et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Vishwakarma, B. D., Bates, P., Sneeuw, N., Westaway, R. M., and Bamber, J. L.: Re-assessing global water storage trends from GRACE time series,  Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx143"><label>Wada et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P., and Bierkens, M. F.: Nonsustainable groundwater  sustaining irrigation: A global assessment, Water Resour. Res., 48,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR010562</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx144"><label>Wada et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Wada, Y., Reager, J. T., Chao, B. F., Wang, J., Lo, M.-H., Song, C., Li, Y.,  and Gardner, A. S.: Recent changes in land water storage and its contribution  to sea level variations, Surv. Geophys., 38, 131–152, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx145"><label>Walvoord et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Walvoord, M. A., Voss, C. I., and Wellman, T. P.: Influence of permafrost  distribution on groundwater flow in the context of climate-driven permafrost  thaw: Example from Yukon Flats Basin, Alaska, United States, Water Resour. Res., 48, W07524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011WR011595</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx146"><label>Wang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Wang, H., Jia, L., Steffen, H., Wu, P., Jiang, L., Hsu, H., Xiang, L., Wang,  Z., and Hu, B.: Increased water storage in North America and Scandinavia  from GRACE gravity data, Nature Geoscience, 6, 38–42, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx147"><label>Wang et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Song, C., Reager, J. T., Yao, F., Famiglietti, J. S., Sheng, Y.,  MacDonald, G. M., Brun, F., Müller Schmied, H., Marston, R. A., and Wada,  Y.: Recent global decline in endorheic basin water storages, Nat. Geosci., 11, 926–932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0265-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0265-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx148"><label>Wang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Zhou, F., Fatolazadeh, F., Russell, H. A. J., and Bunn, M.:  Accelerated water loss over Canada's landmass in 2002–2024, Research Square [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6253460/v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21203/rs.3.rs-6253460/v1</ext-link>,, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx149"><label>Werth et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Werth, S., White, D., and Bliss, D.: GRACE detected rise of groundwater in  the Sahelian Niger River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 10459–10477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JB014845</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx150"><label>World Meteorological Organization(2022)</label><mixed-citation> World Meteorological Organization: The 2022 GCOS ECVs Requirements, Tech. Rep. GCOS-245, Global Climate Observing System, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx151"><label>Wouters et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Wouters, B., Gardner, A. S., and Moholdt, G.: Global glacier mass loss during  the GRACE satellite mission (2002–2016), Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2019.00096</ext-link>,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx152"><label>Wright et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Wright, S. N., Thompson, L. M., Olefeldt, D., Connon, R. F., Carpino, O. A.,  Beel, C. R., and Quinton, W. L.: Thaw-induced impacts on land and water in  discontinuous permafrost: A review of the Taiga Plains and Taiga Shield,  northwestern Canada, Earth-Sci. Rev., 232, 104104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104104</ext-link>, 2022. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx153"><label>Xanke and Liesch(2022)</label><mixed-citation> Xanke, J. and Liesch, T.: Quantification and possible causes of declining  groundwater resources in the Euro-Mediterranean region from 2003 to 2020,  Hydrogeol. J., 30, 379–400, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx154"><label>Yang et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, X., Tian, S., Feng, W., Ran, J., You, W., Jiang, Z., and Gong, X.:  Spatio-temporal evaluation of water storage trends from hydrological models  over Australia using GRACE mascon solutions, Remote Sensing, 12, 3578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213578" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs12213578</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx155"><label>Yang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Yang, Y., Long, D., Guan, H., Scanlon, B. R., Simmons, C. T., Jiang, L., and  Xu, X.: GRACE satellite observed hydrological controls on interannual and  seasonal variability in surface greenness over mainland Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 2245–2260, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx156"><label>Yao et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Yao, C., Luo, Z., Wang, H., Li, Q., and Zhou, H.: GRACE-derived terrestrial  water storage changes in the inter-basin region and its possible influencing  factors: A case study of the Sichuan Basin, China, Remote Sensing, 8, 444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs8060444</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx157"><label>Zemp and Welty(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Zemp, M. and Welty, E.: Temporal downscaling of glaciological mass balance  using seasonal observations, J. Glaciol., 69, 2163–2168,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.66" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2023.66</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx158"><label>Zemp et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Zemp, M., Huss, M., Thibert, E., Eckert, N., McNabb, R., Huber, J., Barandun,  M., Machguth, H., Nussbaumer, S. U., Gärtner-Roer, I., Thomson, L., Paul,  F., Maussion, F., Kutuzov, S., and Cogley, J. G.: Global glacier mass changes  and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016, Nature, 568,  382–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx159"><label>Zhao and Li(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Zhao, K. and Li, X.: Estimating terrestrial water storage changes in the Tarim River Basin using GRACE data, Geophys. J. Int., 211, 1449–1460, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx160"><label>Zhao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Q., Zhang, B., Yao, Y., Wu, W., Meng, G., and Chen, Q.: Geodetic and  hydrological measurements reveal the recent acceleration of groundwater  depletion in North China Plain, J. Hydrology, 575, 1065–1072,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.016</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Continental water storage trends and budgets from the GRACE/GRACE-FO Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P)</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ahmed and Wiese(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahmed, M. and Wiese, D. N.: Short-term trends in Africa's freshwater  resources: Rates and drivers, Sci. Total Environ., 695, 133843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133843" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133843</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Albergel et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albergel, C., De Rosnay, P., Gruhier, C., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Hasenauer, S., Isaksen, L., Kerr, Y., and Wagner, W.: Evaluation of remotely sensed and  modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ  observations, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 215–226, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Allen and Tett(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allen, M. R. and Tett, S. F.: Checking for model consistency in optimal  fingerprinting, Clim. Dynam., 15, 419–434, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Amiri-Simkooei et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Amiri-Simkooei, A., Hosseini-Asl, M., Asgari, J., and Zangeneh-Nejad, F.:  Offset detection in GPS position time series using multivariate analysis, GPS Solutions, 23, 1–12, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Anyah et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anyah, R., Forootan, E., Awange, J. L., and Khaki, M.: Understanding linkages  between global climate indices and terrestrial water storage changes over  Africa using GRACE products, Sci. Total Environ., 635, 1405–1416, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Argus et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Argus, D. F., Martens, H. R., Borsa, A. A., Knappe, E., Wiese, D. N., Alam, S., Anderson, M., Khatiwada, A., Lau, N., Peidou, A., Swarr, M., White, A. M., Bos, M. S., Ellmer, M., Landerer, F. W., and Gardiner, W. P.: Subsurface Water Flux in California's Central Valley and Its Source Watershed From Space Geodesy, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099583,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099583</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Asoka et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Asoka, A., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., and Mishra, V.: Relative contribution of  monsoon precipitation and pumping to changes in groundwater storage in  India, Nat. Geosci., 10, 109–117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2869" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2869</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Beltaos and Peters(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beltaos, S. and Peters, D. L.: Effects of regulation on open-water flows in the lower Peace River, Canada, and implications for the recharge of  Peace-Athabasca Delta basins, River Res. Appl., 40, 151–162, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bhanja et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bhanja, S. N., Mukherjee, A., Rodell, M., Wada, Y., Chattopadhyay, S.,  Velicogna, I., Pangaluru, K., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Groundwater  rejuvenation in parts of India influenced by water-policy change implementation, Scientific Reports, 7, 7453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07058-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07058-2</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bierkens and Wada(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bierkens, M. F. and Wada, Y.: Non-renewable groundwater use and groundwater  depletion: a review, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 063002,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1a5f</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Bindoff et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bindoff, N. L., Stott, P. A., AchutaRao, K. M., Allen, M. R., Gillett, N.,  Gutzler, D., Hansingo, K., Hegerl, G., Hu, Y., Jain, S., Mokhov, I. I.,  Overland, J., Perlwitz, J., Sebbari, R., and Zhang, X.: Detection and  attribution of climate change: from global to regional, in: Climate Change  2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the  Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,  edited by Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K.,  Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 867–952, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.022</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Boergens et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boergens, E., Güntner, A., Sips, M., Schwatke, C., and Dobslaw, H.: Interannual variations of terrestrial water storage in the East African Rift region, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4733–4754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4733-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4733-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Bonsal et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bonsal, B. R., Peters, D. L., Seglenieks, F., Rivera, A., and Berg, A.: Changes in freshwater availability across Canada, in: Canada's Changing Climate Report, edited by: Bush, E. and Lemmen, D. S., Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 261–342, ISBN 978-0-660-30222-5, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bos et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bos, M., Fernandes, R., Williams, S., and Bastos, L.: Fast error analysis of  continuous GPS observations, J. Geodesy, 82, 157–166, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Bos et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bos, M., Fernandes, R., and Bastos, L.: Hector user manual version 1.9,  Space &amp; Earth Geodetic Analysis Laboratory (SEGAL), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal,  <a href="https://segal.ubi.pt/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hector_manual_1.9.pdf" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 19 January 2024), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Braun et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Braun, M. H., Malz, P., Sommer, C., Farías-Barahona, D., Sauter, T.,  Casassa, G., Soruco, A., Skvarca, P., and Seehaus, T. C.: Constraining  glacier elevation and mass changes in South America, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 130–136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0375-7</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Bring et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bring, A., Fedorova, I., Dibike, Y., Hinzman, L., Mård, J., Mernild, S. H., Prowse, T., Semenova, O., Stuefer, S. L., and Woo, M.-K.: Arctic terrestrial hydrology: A synthesis of processes, regional effects, and research challenges, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 621–649,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003131</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Bulygina et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bulygina, O. N., Groisman, P. Y., Razuvaev, V. N., and Korshunova, N. N.:  Changes in snow cover characteristics over Northern Eurasia since 1966,  Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 045204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045204" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045204</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Çakan et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Çakan, Ç., Yılmaz, M. T., Dobslaw, H., Ince, E. S., Evrendilek, F., Förste, C., and Yagci, A. L.: Evaluation of globally gridded precipitation data and satellite-based terrestrial water storage products using hydrological drought recovery time, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3359–3377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3359-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3359-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Cao et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cao, G., Zheng, C., Scanlon, B. R., Liu, J., and Li, W.: Use of flow modeling  to assess sustainability of groundwater resources in the North China Plain,  Water Resour. Res., 49, 159–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011899" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011899</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Chandanpurkar et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chandanpurkar, H. A., Famiglietti, J. S., Gopalan, K., Wiese, D. N., Wada, Y., Kakinuma, K., Reager, J. T., and Zhang, F.: Unprecedented continental drying, shrinking freshwater availability, and increasing land contributions to sea level rise, Science Advances, 11, eadx0298, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx0298" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx0298</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Chaudhari et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chaudhari, S., Pokhrel, Y., Moran, E., and Miguez-Macho, G.: Multi-decadal hydrologic change and variability in the Amazon River basin: understanding terrestrial water storage variations and drought characteristics, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2841–2862, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2841-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2841-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Chen et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, J., Wilson, C., Tapley, B., Longuevergne, L., Yang, Z., and Scanlon, B.: Recent La Plata basin drought conditions observed by satellite gravimetry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D22108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014689" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014689</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Chen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, J. L., Pekker, T., Wilson, C. R., Tapley, B. D., Kostianoy, A. G.,  Crétaux, J.-F., and Safarov, E. S.: Long-term Caspian Sea level change,  Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 6993–7001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL073958</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Choulga et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Choulga, M., Moschini, F., Mazzetti, C., Grimaldi, S., Disperati, J., Beck, H., Salamon, P., and Prudhomme, C.: Technical note: Surface fields for global environmental modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 2991–3036, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2991-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Ciracì et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ciracì, E., Velicogna, I., and Swenson, S.: Continuity of the mass loss of  the world's glaciers and ice caps from the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On  missions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086926" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086926</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Cook et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S., Marvel, K., Williams, A. P., Smerdon, J. E., and  Anchukaitis, K. J.: Twenty-First Century Drought Projections in the CMIP6  Forcing Scenarios, Earth's Future, 8, e2019EF001461,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001461</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Cui et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cui, L., Zhu, C., Wu, Y., Yao, C., Wang, X., An, J., and Wei, P.: Natural-and  human-induced influences on terrestrial water storage change in Sichuan,  Southwest China from 2003 to 2020, Remote Sensing, 14, 1369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061369" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061369</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Dahle et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dahle, C., Boergens, E., Sasgen, I., Döhne, T., Reißland, S., Dobslaw, H., Klemann, V., Murböck, M., König, R., Dill, R., Sips, M., Sylla, U., Groh, A., Horwath, M., and Flechtner, F.: GravIS: mass anomaly products from satellite gravimetry, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 611–631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Dangar et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dangar, S., Asoka, A., and Mishra, V.: Causes and implications of groundwater  depletion in India: A review, J. Hydrol., 596, 126103,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126103</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>de Graaf et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Graaf, I. E., van Beek, R. L., Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Schmitz, O.,  Sutanudjaja, E. H., and Bierkens, M. F.: A global-scale two-layer transient  groundwater model: Development and application to groundwater depletion,  Adv. Water Resour., 102, 53–67, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>de Melo and Wendland(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Melo, D. C. D. and Wendland, E.: Using GRACE to Quantify the Depletion of Terrestrial Water Storage in Northeastern Brazil: The Urucuia Aquifer  System, Sci. Total Environ., 705, 135828,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135828</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Döll et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Döll, P., Müller Schmied, H., Schuh, C., Portmann, F. T., and Eicker,  A.: Global-scale assessment of groundwater depletion and related groundwater  abstractions: Combining hydrological modeling with information from well  observations and GRACE satellites, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5698–5720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015595</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Dorigo et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dorigo, W., Dietrich, S., Aires, F., Brocca, L., Carter, S., Cretaux, J.-F.,  Dunkerley, D., Enomoto, H., Forsberg, R., Güntner, A., Hegglin, M. I.,  Hollmann, R., Hurst, D. F., Johannessen, J. A., Kummerow, C., Lee, T.,  Luojus, K., Looser, U., Miralles, D. G., Pellet, V., Recknagel, T.,  Ruz Vargas, C., Schneider, U., Schoeneich, P., Schröder, M., Tapper, N.,  Vuglinsky, V., Wagner, W., Yu, L., Zappa, L., Zemp, M., and Aich, V.: Closing  the water cycle from observations across scales: Where do we stand?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 102, E1897–E1935, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0316.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0316.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Dubois et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubois, E., Larocque, M., Gagné, S., and Braun, M.: Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge in cold and humid climates: Controlling processes and thresholds, Climate, 10, 6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10010006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10010006</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Dussaillant et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dussaillant, I., Bannwart, J., Paul, F., and Zemp, M.: Glacier mass change  global gridded data from 1976 to present derived from the Fluctuations of  Glaciers Database, World Glacier Monitoring Service [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.ba597449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.ba597449</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Eicker et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eicker, A., Schawohl, L., Middendorf, K., Bagge, M., Jensen, L., and Dobslaw,  H.: Influence of GIA uncertainty on climate model evaluation with
GRACE/GRACE-FO satellite gravimetry data, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 129, e2023JB027769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB027769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB027769</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Famiglietti et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Famiglietti, J. S., Lo, M., Ho, S. L., Bethune, J., Anderson, K., Syed, T. H., Swenson, S. C., de Linage, C. R., and Rodell, M.: Satellites measure recent rates of groundwater depletion in California's Central Valley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L03403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046442</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Fatolazadeh and Goïta(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fatolazadeh, F. and Goïta, K.: Mapping terrestrial water storage changes  in Canada using GRACE and GRACE-FO, Sci. Total Environ., 779, 146435, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146435</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Favreau et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Favreau, G., Cappelaere, B., Massuel, S., Leblanc, M., Boucher, M., Boulain,  N., and Leduc, C.: Land clearing, climate variability, and water resources  increase in semiarid southwest Niger: A review, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00A16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006785</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Felfelani et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Felfelani, F., Wada, Y., Longuevergne, L., and Pokhrel, Y. N.: Natural and  human-induced terrestrial water storage change: A global analysis using  hydrological models and GRACE, J. Hydrol., 553, 105–118, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Feng et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Feng, W., Zhong, M., Lemoine, J.-M., Biancale, R., Hsu, H.-T., and Xia, J.:  Evaluation of groundwater depletion in North China using the Gravity  Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data and ground-based measurements, Water Resour. Res., 49, 2110–2118, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20192</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Franzke(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Franzke, C.: Nonlinear trends, long-range dependence, and climate noise  properties of surface temperature, J. Climate, 25, 4172–4183, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Frappart(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frappart, F.: Groundwater storage changes in the major North African  transboundary aquifer systems during the GRACE era (2003–2016), Water, 12,  2669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102669</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Frappart and Ramillien(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frappart, F. and Ramillien, G.: Monitoring Groundwater Storage Changes Using  the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Satellite Mission: A  Review, Remote Sensing, 10, 829, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060829" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060829</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Fraser et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fraser, R. H., Kokelj, S. V., Lantz, T. C., McFarlane-Winchester, M., Olthof,  I., and Lacelle, D.: Climate sensitivity of high Arctic permafrost terrain  demonstrated by widespread ice-wedge thermokarst on Banks Island, Remote  Sensing, 10, 954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060954</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Frederikse et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frederikse, T., Landerer, F., Caron, L., Adhikari, S., Parkes, D., Humphrey,  V. W., Dangendorf, S., Hogarth, P., Zanna, L., Cheng, L., and Wu, Y.-H.: The  causes of sea-level rise since 1900, Nature, 584, 393–397,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2591-3</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Gafurov et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gafurov, A., Selyuzhenok, V., Latinovic, M., Apel, H., Mamaraimov, A.,  Salokhiddinov, A., Boergens, E., and Güntner, A.: GRACE observes the  natural and irrigation-induced regional redistribution of water storage in  Central Asia, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 56, 101994,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101994</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>García-Sanz et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
García-Sanz, I., Heine-Fuster, I., Luque, J. A., Pizarro, H., Castillo, R., Pailahual, M., Prieto, M., Pérez-Portilla, P., and Aránguiz-Acuña, A: Limnological Response from High-Altitude Wetlands  to the Water Supply in the Andean Altiplano, Scientific Reports, 11, 7681, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87162-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87162-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Gardner et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Wouters, B., Wolken, G. J., Burgess, D. O., Sharp, M. J., Cogley, J. G., Braun, C., and Labine, C.: Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Nature, 473, 357–360, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10089</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Gbetkom et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gbetkom, P. G., Crétaux, J.-F., Biancamaria, S., Blazquez, A., Paris, A.,  Tchilibou, M., Gal, L., Kitambo, B., Oliveira, R. A. J., and Gosset, M.: Lake Tanganyika basin water storage variations from 2003–2021 for water balance and flood monitoring, Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 34, 101182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Gobron et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gobron, K., Rebischung, P., de Viron, O., Demoulin, A., and Van Camp, M.:  Impact of offsets on assessing the low-frequency stochastic properties of  geodetic time series, J. Geodesy, 96, 46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01634-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01634-9</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Gobron et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gobron, K., Hohensinn, R., Loizeau, X., Bulgin, C. E., Merchant, C. J.,  Woolliams, E. R., Cox, M. G., Dorigo, W., Howard, T., Langsdale, M., Povey,  A. C., Ablain, M., Bogusz, J., Gruber, A., Klos, A., and Mittaz, J.: A  Unified Framework for Trend Uncertainty Assessment in Climate Data Records:  Demonstration on Global Mean Sea Level, Surv. Geophys.,  online first, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-025-09922-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-025-09922-7</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Goncalves et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goncalves, J., Petersen, J., Deschamps, P., Hamelin, B., and Baba-Sy, O.:  Quantifying the modern recharge of the “fossil” Sahara aquifers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2673–2678, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Gonzales et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gonzales, L., López, V., Huamán, D., Villalobos, C., Espinoza, R., Vega, M.,  and Ramos, J.: Two Decades of Groundwater Variability in Peru Using  Satellite Gravimetry Data, Appl. Sci., 15, 8071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148071</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Gronewold and Rood(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gronewold, A. D. and Rood, R. B.: Recent water level changes across Earth's largest lake system and implications for future variability, J. Great Lakes Res., 45, 1–3, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.10.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.10.012</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Gunes and Aydin(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gunes, O. and Aydin, C.: Colored noise in GRACE total water storage time  series: Its impact on trend significance in the Türkiye region and  major world river basins, Adv. Space Res., 74, 1633–1647,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.051</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Güntner et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Güntner, A., Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Cao, F., Dahle, C., Darbeheshti, N., Dobslaw, H., Dussaillant, I., Dorigo, W., Flechtner, F., Jäggi, A., Kosmale, M., Lasser, M., Luojus, K., Meyer, U., Pasik, A., Preimersberger, W., Ruz Vargas, C., and Zemp, M.: The Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P), Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-797</a>, in review, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Güntner et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Güntner, A., Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H.,  Dorigo, W., Dussailant, I., Flechtner, F., Jäggi, A., Kosmale, M., Luojus,  K., Mayer-Gürr, T., Meyer, U., Preimesberger, W., Ruz Vargas, C., and Zemp,  M.: Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product (G3P) V.1.12, GFZ Data Services [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5880/g3p.2024.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5880/g3p.2024.001</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Haacker et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haacker, E. M., Kendall, A. D., and Hyndman, D. W.: Water level declines in the High Plains Aquifer: Predevelopment to resource senescence, Groundwater,  54, 231–242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12350</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Hamdi and Goïta(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hamdi, M. and Goïta, K.: Analysis of groundwater depletion in the  saskatchewan river basin in Canada from coupled SWAT-MODFLOW and  satellite gravimetry, Hydrology, 10, 188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10090188" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10090188</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Hasselmann(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasselmann, K.: Multi-pattern fingerprint method for detection and attribution of climate change, Clim. Dynam., 13, 601–611, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Hirschi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hirschi, M., Stradiotti, P., Crezee, B., Dorigo, W., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Potential of long-term satellite observations and reanalysis products for characterising soil drying: trends and drought events, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 397–425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-397-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-397-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Hoell et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoell, A., Gaughan, A. E., Shukla, S., and Magadzire, T.: The hydrologic  effects of synchronous El Niño–Southern oscillation and subtropical  Indian ocean dipole events over Southern Africa, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2407–2424, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Hohensinn(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hohensinn, R.: Parameter estimates for GRACE/GRACE-FO TWS and GWS trend analysis (G3P, 2002–2023), Version v1, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18538047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18538047</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Hohensinn et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hohensinn, R., Ruttner, P., and Bock, Y.: Sensitivity of GNSS to vertical  land motion over Europe: effects of geophysical loadings and common-mode  errors, J. Geodesy, 98, 68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01856-z</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Huang et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, J., Halpenny, J., Van Der Wal, W., Klatt, C., James, T., and Rivera, A.: Detectability of groundwater storage change within the Great Lakes Water  Basin using GRACE, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 117, B08401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008876" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008876</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Huang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, Q., Wang, P., Wang, R., Yu, J., Frolova, N. L., and Pozdniakov, S. P.:  Differential decline in terrestrial water storage across major  permafrost-dominated Arctic River basins during the rapid warming period  from 1981 to 2020, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042978</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Humphrey and Gudmundsson(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humphrey, V. and Gudmundsson, L.: GRACE-REC: a reconstruction of climate-driven water storage changes over the last century, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1153–1170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1153-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1153-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Humphrey et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humphrey, V., Gudmundsson, L., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Assessing global water  storage variability from GRACE: Trends, seasonal cycle, subseasonal  anomalies and extremes, Surv. Geophys., 37, 357–395,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9367-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9367-1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Humphrey et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Humphrey, V., Gudmundsson, L., and Seneviratne, S. I.: A globalreconstruction  of climate-driven subdecadal water storage variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2300–2309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072564" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072564</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Jackson et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jackson, C. R., Bloomfield, J. P., and Mackay, J. D.: Evidence for changes in  historic and future groundwater levels in the UK, Prog. Phys. Geog., 39, 49–67, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Jäggi et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jäggi, A., Meyer, U., Lasser, M., Jenny, B., Lopez, T., Flechtner, F., Dahle, C., Förste, C., Mayer-Gürr, T., Kvas, A., Lemoine, J.-M., Bourgogne, S., Weigelt, M., and Groh, A.: International Combination Service for Time-Variable Gravity Fields (COST-G) – Start of Operational Phase and  Future Perspectives, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 152,  57–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2020_109</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Jarugula and McPhaden(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jarugula, S. and McPhaden, M. J.: Indian Ocean Dipole affects eastern  tropical Atlantic salinity through Congo River Basin hydrology,  Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 4, 366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01027-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01027-6</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Jasechko et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jasechko, S., Seybold, H., Perrone, D., Fan, Y., Shamsudduha, M., Taylor,  R. G., Fallatah, O., and Kirchner, J. W.: Rapid groundwater decline and some  cases of recovery in aquifers globally, Nature, 625, 715–721, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Jensen et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jensen, L., Eicker, A., Dobslaw, H., Stacke, T., and Humphrey, V.: Long-term  wetting and drying trends in land water storage derived from GRACE and CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 9808–9823, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Jiang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, Y., Zhou, L., Roundy, P. E., Hua, W., and Raghavendra, A.: Increasing influence of Indian Ocean dipole on precipitation over central equatorial Africa, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092370</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Joodaki et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joodaki, G., Wahr, J., and Swenson, S.: Estimating the human contribution to  groundwater depletion in the Middle East, from GRACE data, land surface  models, and well observations, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2679–2692, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Kayastha et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kayastha, M. B., Ye, X., Huang, C., and Xue, P.: Future rise of the Great  Lakes water levels under climate change, J. Hydrol., 612, 128205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128205" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128205</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Kirshen et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kirshen, A. B., Moran, B. J., Munk, L. A., Russo, A. A., McKnight, S. V.,  Jenckes, J., Corkran, D. B., Bresee, M., and Boutt, D. F.: Freshwater inflows  to closed basins of the Andean plateau in Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia, Communications Earth &amp; Environment, 6, 177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02130-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02130-6</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Knief and Forstmeier(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knief, U. and Forstmeier, W.: Violating the normality assumption may be the  lesser of two evils, Behav. Res. Methods, 53, 2576–2590, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Konikow(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Konikow, L. F.: Long-term groundwater depletion in the United States, Groundwater, 53, 2–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12306</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Koscielny-Bunde et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koscielny-Bunde, E., Kantelhardt, J. W., Braun, P., Bunde, A., and Havlin, S.: Long-term persistence and multifractality of river runoff records: Detrended fluctuation studies, J. Hydrol., 322, 120–137,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.004</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Koutsoyiannis(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koutsoyiannis, D.: Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon, and hydrological  statistics, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 3–24, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Kvas et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kvas, A., Boergens, E., Dobslaw, H., Eicker, A., Mayer-Guerr, T., and  Güntner, A.: Evaluating long-term water storage trends in small  catchments and aquifers from a joint inversion of 20 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO mission data, Geophys. J. Int., 236, 1002–1012, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Lai et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lai, E. N., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Virkki, V., Porkka, M., and van der Ent, R. J.: Root zone soil moisture in over 25&thinsp;% of global land permanently beyond pre-industrial variability as early as 2050 without climate policy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 3999–4018, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3999-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3999-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Landerer et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landerer, F. W., Flechtner, F. M., Save, H., Webb, F. H., Bandikova, T.,  Bertiger, W. I., Bettadpur, S. V., Byun, S. H., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H.,  Fahnestock, E., Harvey, N., Kang, Z., Kruizinga, G. L. H., Loomis, B. D.,  McCullough, C., Murböck, M., Nagel, P., Paik, M., Pie, N., Poole, S.,  Strekalov, D., Tamisiea, M. E., Wang, F., Watkins, M. M., Wen, H.-Y., Wiese,  D. N., and Yuan, D.-N.: Extending the global mass change data record: GRACE  Follow-On instrument and science data performance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088306</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Lewkowicz and Way(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lewkowicz, A. G. and Way, R. G.: Extremes of summer climate trigger thousands  of thermokarst landslides in a High Arctic environment, Nat. Commun., 10, 1329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09314-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09314-7</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Li and Rodell(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, B. and Rodell, M.: Terrestrial water storage in 2023, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 5, 247–249, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Li et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Wang, S., and Zhou, F.: Time series analysis of long-term terrestrial  water storage over Canada from GRACE satellites using principal component  analysis, Can. J. Remote Sens., 42, 161–170,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1166042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2016.1166042</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Li and Zhang(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Z. and Zhang, Y.-K.: Quantifying fractal dynamics of groundwater systems  with detrended fluctuation analysis, J. Hydrol., 336, 139–146, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Lin et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, H., Cheng, X., Zheng, L., Peng, X., Feng, W., and Peng, F.: Recent changes in groundwater and surface water in large pan-arctic river basins, Remote Sensing, 14, 607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030607" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030607</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Little and Bloomfield(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Little, M. A. and Bloomfield, J. P.: Robust evidence for random fractal scaling of groundwater levels in unconfined aquifers, J. Hydrol., 393,  362–369, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Lucas et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lucas, M. C., Kublik, N., Rodrigues, D. B. B., Meira Neto, A. A., Almagro, A., de Melo, D. C. D., Zipper, S. C., and de Oliveira, P. T. S.: Significant  Baseflow Reduction in the São Francisco River Basin, Water, 13,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010002</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Luojus et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luojus, K., Pulliainen, J., Takala, M., Lemmetyinen, J., Mortimer, C., Derksen, C., Mudryk, L., Moisander, M., Hiltunen, M., Smolander, T., Ikonen, J., Cohen, J., Salminen, M., Norberg, J., Veijola, K., and Venäläinen, P.:  GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset, Scientific Data, 8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00939-2</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>MacQueen(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
      
MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate  observations, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical  Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Statistics, University of California Press, 5, 281–298, 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Mandelbrot and Wallis(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mandelbrot, B. B. and Wallis, J. R.: Some long-run properties of geophysical  records, Water Resour. Res., 5, 321–340, 1969.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Merchant et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Merchant, C. J., Paul, F., Popp, T., Ablain, M., Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Hollmann, R., Lavergne, T., Laeng, A., de Leeuw, G., Mittaz, J., Poulsen, C., Povey, A. C., Reuter, M., Sathyendranath, S., Sandven, S., Sofieva, V. F., and Wagner, W.: Uncertainty information in climate data records from Earth observation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 511–527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-511-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-511-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Merchant et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Merchant, C. J., Woolliams, E. R., Dorigo, W., Bulgin, C. E., Gobron, K.,  Hohensinn, R., Loizeau, X., and Tynan, C. P. J.: Stability specifications for  climate data records: their meaning and application in evaluating geophysical  trend uncertainty, Surv. Geophys., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09941-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09941-y</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Meyer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meyer, U., Lasser, M., Dahle, C., Förste, C., Behzadpour, S., Koch, I., and Jäggi, A.: Combined monthly GRACE-FO gravity fields for a Global  Gravity-based Groundwater Product, Geophys. J. Int., 236,  456–469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad437</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>Montillet and Bos(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montillet, J.-P. and Bos, M. S.: Geodetic time series analysis in earth  sciences, Springer, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21718-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21718-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>Mudelsee(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mudelsee, M.: Climate Time Series Analysis: Classical Statistical and Bootstrap Methods, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9482-7</a>, ISBN 978-90-481-9482-7, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Mudelsee(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mudelsee, M.: Trend analysis of climate time series: A review of methods,  Earth-Sci. Rev., 190, 310–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.005</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>Muskett and Romanovsky(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muskett, R. R. and Romanovsky, V. E.: Alaskan permafrost groundwater storage  changes derived from GRACE and ground measurements, Remote Sensing, 3,  378–397, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3020378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3020378</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Naumann et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Naumann, G., Podesta, G., Marengo, J., Luterbacher, J., Bavera, D., Acosta Navarro, J., Arias-Muñoz, C., Barbosa, P., Cammalleri, C., Cuartas Luz, A., De Estrada, M., De Felice, M., De Jager, A., Escobar, C., Fioravanti, G., Giordano, L., Hrast Essenfelder, A., Hidalgo, C., Leal De Moraes, O. L., Maetens, W., Magni, D., Masante, D., Mazzeschi, M., Osman, M., Rossi, L., Seluchi, M., De Los Milagros Skansi, M., Spennemann, P., Spinoni, J., Toreti, A., and Vera, C.: Extreme and Long-Term Drought in the La Plata Basin: Event Evolution and Impact Assessment until September 2022, Technical Report JRC132245, Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Luxembourg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2760/62557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2760/62557</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Ni et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ni, S., Chen, J., Wilson, C. R., Li, J., Hu, X., and Fu, R.: Global terrestrial water storage changes and connections to ENSO events, Surv.
Geophys., 39, 1–22, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Nikraftar et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nikraftar, Z., Parizi, E., Saber, M., Hosseini, S. M., Ataie-Ashtiani, B., and Simmons, C. T.: Groundwater sustainability assessment in the Middle East using GRACE/GRACE-FO data, Hydrogeol. J., 32, 321–337, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Noël et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noël, B., van de Berg, W. J., Machguth, H., Lhermitte, S., Howat, I.,  Fettweis, X., and van den Broeke, M. R.: Six Decades of Glacial Mass Loss in  the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 123, 1430–1449, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004304" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004304</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Orth and Seneviratne(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Orth, R. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Analysis of soil moisture memory from  observations in Europe, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017366</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Orth et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Orth, R., Staudinger, M., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Inferring Soil Moisture  Memory from Streamflow Observations Using a Simple Water Balance Model, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 1773–1790, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-099.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-099.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Otosaka et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Otosaka, I. N., Shepherd, A., Ivins, E. R., Schlegel, N.-J., Amory, C., van den Broeke, M. R., Horwath, M., Joughin, I., King, M. D., Krinner, G., Nowicki, S., Payne, A. J., Rignot, E., Scambos, T., Simon, K. M., Smith, B. E., Sørensen, L. S., Velicogna, I., Whitehouse, P. L., A, G., Agosta, C., Ahlstrøm, A. P., Blazquez, A., Colgan, W., Engdahl, M. E., Fettweis, X., Forsberg, R., Gallée, H., Gardner, A., Gilbert, L., Gourmelen, N., Groh, A., Gunter, B. C., Harig, C., Helm, V., Khan, S. A., Kittel, C., Konrad, H., Langen, P. L., Lecavalier, B. S., Liang, C.-C., Loomis, B. D., McMillan, M., Melini, D., Mernild, S. H., Mottram, R., Mouginot, J., Nilsson, J., Noël, B., Pattle, M. E., Peltier, W. R., Pie, N., Roca, M., Sasgen, I., Save, H. V., Seo, K.-W., Scheuchl, B., Schrama, E. J. O., Schröder, L., Simonsen, S. B., Slater, T., Spada, G., Sutterley, T. C., Vishwakarma, B. D., van Wessem, J. M., Wiese, D., van der Wal, W., and Wouters, B.: Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from 1992 to 2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1597–1616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1597-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1597-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Pasik et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pasik, A., Gruber, A., Preimesberger, W., De Santis, D., and Dorigo, W.: Uncertainty estimation for a new exponential-filter-based long-term root-zone soil moisture dataset from Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) surface observations, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4957–4976, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4957-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Patterson and Thompson(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R.: Recovery of inter-block information when  block sizes are unequal, Biometrika, 58, 545–554, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Pfeffer et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pfeffer, J., Cazenave, A., and Barnoud, A.: Analysis of the interannual variability in satellite gravity solutions: detection of climate modes fingerprints in water mass displacements across continents and oceans, Clim. Dynam., 58, 1065–1084, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Pokhrel et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pokhrel, Y., Felfelani, F., Satoh, Y., Boulange, J., Burek, P., Gädeke, A., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Grillakis, M., Gudmundsson, L., Hanasaki, N.,  Kim, H., Koutroulis, A., Liu, J., Papadimitriou, L., Schewe, J.,  Müller Schmied, H., Stacke, T., Telteu, C.-E., Thiery, W., Veldkamp, T.,  Zhao, F., and Wada, Y.: Global terrestrial water storage and drought severity  under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 226–233,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00972-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Preimesberger et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Preimesberger, W., Stradiotti, P., and Dorigo, W.: ESA CCI Soil Moisture GAPFILLED: an independent global gap-free satellite climate data record with uncertainty estimates, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4305–4329, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4305-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4305-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Richey et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Richey, A. S., Thomas, B. F., Lo, M.-H., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S.,  Voss, K., Swenson, S., and Rodell, M.: Quantifying renewable groundwater  stress with GRACE, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5217–5238,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017349</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Riva et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riva, R. E., Bamber, J. L., Lavallée, D. A., and Wouters, B.: Sea-level  fingerprint of continental water and ice mass change from GRACE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044770" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044770</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib119"><label>Rodell et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodell, M., Velicogna, I., and Famiglietti, J. S.: Satellite-based estimates  of groundwater depletion in India, Nature, 460, 999–1002,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08238</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib120"><label>Rodell et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodell, M., Famiglietti, J. S., Wiese, D. N., Reager, J., Beaudoing, H. K.,  Landerer, F. W., and Lo, M.-H.: Emerging trends in global freshwater  availability, Nature, 557, 651–659, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib121"><label>Roe(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roe, G. H.: What do glaciers tell us about climate variability and climate  change?, J. Glaciol., 57, 567–578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796905640" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311796905640</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib122"><label>Saito et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saito, Y. K., Justino, F., Gurjão, C. D., Zita, L., Paixão, P., and  Ramiro, Í.: Soil Moisture Dynamics in South America: A Multi-Dataset  Analysis From 1990 to 2020, Int. J. Climatol., 45, e70047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70047</a>,  2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib123"><label>Satizábal-Alarcón et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Satizábal-Alarcón, D. A., Suhogusoff, A., and Ferrari, L. C.:  Characterization of groundwater storage changes in the Amazon River Basin  based on downscaling of GRACE/GRACE-FO data with machine learning models,  Sci. Total Environ., 912, 168958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168958</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib124"><label>Scanlon et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scanlon, B. R., Faunt, C. C., Longuevergne, L., Reedy, R. C., Alley, W. M.,  McGuire, V. L., and McMahon, P. B.: Groundwater depletion and sustainability  of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley, P. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 109, 9320–9325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200311109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200311109</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib125"><label>Scanlon et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Save, H., Wiese, D. N., Landerer, F. W., Long, D., Longuevergne, L., and Chen, J.: Global evaluation of new GRACE mascon  products for hydrologic applications, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9412–9429, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019494" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019494</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib126"><label>Scanlon et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Save, H., Sun, A. Y., Müller Schmied, H., van  Beek, L. P. H., Wiese, D. N., Wada, Y., Long, D., Reedy, R. C., Longuevergne,  L., Döll, P., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global models underestimate large  decadal declining and rising water storage trends relative to GRACE satellite  data, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E1080–E1089,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704665115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704665115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib127"><label>Schilling et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schilling, J., Hertig, E., Tramblay, Y., and Scheffran, J.: Climate change  vulnerability, water resources and social implications in North Africa, Reg. Environ. Change, 20, 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01597-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01597-7</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib128"><label>Shalby et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shalby, A., Emara, S. R., Metwally, M. I., Armanuos, A. M., El-Agha, D. E.,  Negm, A. M., and Gado, T. A.: Satellite-based estimates of groundwater  storage depletion over Egypt, Environ. Monit. Assess., 195, 594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11171-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11171-3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib129"><label>Sharifi et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sharifi, E., Haas, J., Boergens, E., Dobslaw, H., and Güntner, A.: Technical note: GRACE-compatible filtering of water storage data sets via spatial autocorrelation analysis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 6985–6998, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6985-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6985-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib130"><label>Shrestha et al.(2012)Shrestha, Dibike, and Prowse</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shrestha, R. R., Dibike, Y. B., and Prowse, T. D.: Modelling of climate-induced hydrologic changes in the Lake Winnipeg watershed, J. Great Lakes Res., 38, 83–94, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib131"><label>Singh et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Singh, A., Seitz, F., and Schwatke, C.: Inter-annual water storage changes in  the Aral Sea from multi-mission satellite altimetry, optical remote sensing, and GRACE satellite gravimetry, Remote Sens. Environ., 123, 187–195, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.001</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib132"><label>Sospedra-Alfonso et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Merryfield, W. J., and Kharin, V. V.: Representation of  Snow in the Canadian Seasonal to Interannual Prediction System. Part II:  Potential Predictability and Hindcast Skill, J. Hydrometeorol., 17,  2511–2535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0027.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0027.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib133"><label>Spinoni et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Carrao, H., Barbosa, P., and Vogt, J.: World drought frequency, duration, and severity for 1951–2010, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 2792–2804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3875</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib134"><label>Spinoni et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spinoni, J., Naumann, G., Vogt, J., and Barbosa, P.: Meteorological droughts in Europe: events and impacts-past trends and future projections, Publications Office of the European Union, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2788/450449" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2788/450449</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib135"><label>Springer et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Springer, A., Lopez, T., Owor, M., Frappart, F., and Stieglitz, T.: The role  of space-based observations for groundwater resource monitoring over Africa, Surv. Geophys., 44, 123–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09759-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09759-4</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib136"><label>Tang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, J., Cheng, H., and Liu, L.: Assessing the recent droughts in Southwestern China using satellite gravimetry, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3030–3038, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib137"><label>Tangdamrongsub et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tangdamrongsub, N., Steele-Dunne, S. C., Gunter, B. C., Ditmar, P. G., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Sun, Y., Xia, T., and Wang, Z.: Improving estimates of water resources in a semi-arid region by assimilating GRACE data into the PCR-GLOBWB hydrological model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2053–2074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2053-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2053-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib138"><label>Tapley et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tapley, B. D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J. C., Thompson, P. F., and Watkins, M. M.: GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system, Science, 305, 503–505, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib139"><label>Thomas et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomas, B. F., Famiglietti, J. S., Landerer, F. W., Wiese, D. N., Molotch,  N. P., and Argus, D. F.: GRACE Groundwater Drought Index: Evaluation of  California Central Valley groundwater drought, Remote Sens. Environ., 198, 384–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.026</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib140"><label>Van Der Knijff et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Der Knijff, J., Younis, J., and De Roo, A.: LISFLOOD: a GIS-based  distributed model for river basin scale water balance and flood simulation,  Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 24, 189–212, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib141"><label>Velicogna(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Velicogna, I.: Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and  Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L19503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040222" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040222</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib142"><label>Vishwakarma et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vishwakarma, B. D., Bates, P., Sneeuw, N., Westaway, R. M., and Bamber, J. L.: Re-assessing global water storage trends from GRACE time series,  Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 034005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a9</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib143"><label>Wada et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P., and Bierkens, M. F.: Nonsustainable groundwater  sustaining irrigation: A global assessment, Water Resour. Res., 48,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010562</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib144"><label>Wada et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wada, Y., Reager, J. T., Chao, B. F., Wang, J., Lo, M.-H., Song, C., Li, Y.,  and Gardner, A. S.: Recent changes in land water storage and its contribution  to sea level variations, Surv. Geophys., 38, 131–152, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib145"><label>Walvoord et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walvoord, M. A., Voss, C. I., and Wellman, T. P.: Influence of permafrost  distribution on groundwater flow in the context of climate-driven permafrost  thaw: Example from Yukon Flats Basin, Alaska, United States, Water Resour. Res., 48, W07524, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011595</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib146"><label>Wang et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Jia, L., Steffen, H., Wu, P., Jiang, L., Hsu, H., Xiang, L., Wang,  Z., and Hu, B.: Increased water storage in North America and Scandinavia  from GRACE gravity data, Nature Geoscience, 6, 38–42, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib147"><label>Wang et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, J., Song, C., Reager, J. T., Yao, F., Famiglietti, J. S., Sheng, Y.,  MacDonald, G. M., Brun, F., Müller Schmied, H., Marston, R. A., and Wada,  Y.: Recent global decline in endorheic basin water storages, Nat. Geosci., 11, 926–932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0265-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0265-7</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib148"><label>Wang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S., Zhou, F., Fatolazadeh, F., Russell, H. A. J., and Bunn, M.:  Accelerated water loss over Canada's landmass in 2002–2024, Research Square [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6253460/v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6253460/v1</a>,, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib149"><label>Werth et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Werth, S., White, D., and Bliss, D.: GRACE detected rise of groundwater in  the Sahelian Niger River basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 10459–10477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014845</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib150"><label>World Meteorological Organization(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
World Meteorological Organization: The 2022 GCOS ECVs Requirements, Tech. Rep. GCOS-245, Global Climate Observing System, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib151"><label>Wouters et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wouters, B., Gardner, A. S., and Moholdt, G.: Global glacier mass loss during  the GRACE satellite mission (2002–2016), Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00096</a>,  2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib152"><label>Wright et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wright, S. N., Thompson, L. M., Olefeldt, D., Connon, R. F., Carpino, O. A.,  Beel, C. R., and Quinton, W. L.: Thaw-induced impacts on land and water in  discontinuous permafrost: A review of the Taiga Plains and Taiga Shield,  northwestern Canada, Earth-Sci. Rev., 232, 104104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104104</a>, 2022.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib153"><label>Xanke and Liesch(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xanke, J. and Liesch, T.: Quantification and possible causes of declining  groundwater resources in the Euro-Mediterranean region from 2003 to 2020,  Hydrogeol. J., 30, 379–400, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib154"><label>Yang et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, X., Tian, S., Feng, W., Ran, J., You, W., Jiang, Z., and Gong, X.:  Spatio-temporal evaluation of water storage trends from hydrological models  over Australia using GRACE mascon solutions, Remote Sensing, 12, 3578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213578" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213578</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib155"><label>Yang et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Long, D., Guan, H., Scanlon, B. R., Simmons, C. T., Jiang, L., and  Xu, X.: GRACE satellite observed hydrological controls on interannual and  seasonal variability in surface greenness over mainland Australia, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 119, 2245–2260, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib156"><label>Yao et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yao, C., Luo, Z., Wang, H., Li, Q., and Zhou, H.: GRACE-derived terrestrial  water storage changes in the inter-basin region and its possible influencing  factors: A case study of the Sichuan Basin, China, Remote Sensing, 8, 444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060444</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib157"><label>Zemp and Welty(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zemp, M. and Welty, E.: Temporal downscaling of glaciological mass balance  using seasonal observations, J. Glaciol., 69, 2163–2168,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.66" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.66</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib158"><label>Zemp et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zemp, M., Huss, M., Thibert, E., Eckert, N., McNabb, R., Huber, J., Barandun,  M., Machguth, H., Nussbaumer, S. U., Gärtner-Roer, I., Thomson, L., Paul,  F., Maussion, F., Kutuzov, S., and Cogley, J. G.: Global glacier mass changes  and their contributions to sea-level rise from 1961 to 2016, Nature, 568,  382–386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1071-0</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib159"><label>Zhao and Li(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, K. and Li, X.: Estimating terrestrial water storage changes in the Tarim River Basin using GRACE data, Geophys. J. Int., 211, 1449–1460, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib160"><label>Zhao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, Q., Zhang, B., Yao, Y., Wu, W., Meng, G., and Chen, Q.: Geodetic and  hydrological measurements reveal the recent acceleration of groundwater  depletion in North China Plain, J. Hydrology, 575, 1065–1072,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.016</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
