<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-30-6599-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis with mixed Weibull components and Copula-based dependence framework</article-title><alt-title>Non-Stationary Mixture Low-Flow Frequency Analysis</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fitriana</surname><given-names>Farhana Sweeta</given-names></name>
          <email>farhana.fitriana@boku.ac.at</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9404-1259</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>Svenja</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-0223</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Weigelhofer</surname><given-names>Gabriele</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Laimighofer</surname><given-names>Johannes</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-0990</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Laaha</surname><given-names>Gregor</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-9640</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Statistics, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute of Hydrobiology and Water Management,  BOKU University, Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Farhana Sweeta Fitriana (farhana.fitriana@boku.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>30</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>6599</fpage><lpage>6622</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Farhana Sweeta Fitriana et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e130">Extreme low flows are a pressing challenge for water management, reducing water availability and degrading water quality. Reliable design estimates are therefore essential. Traditional low-flow frequency analysis relies on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, which is increasingly violated under climate change and by varying low-flow generating processes. In a seasonal snow-influenced climate, annual low-flow extremes may occur in both summer and winter, potentially exhibiting seasonal dependence that challenges conventional modelling approaches. This study extends traditional low-flow frequency analysis to non-stationary conditions by jointly accounting for temporal trends, seasonal heterogeneity and inter-event dependence. Building on previously developed mixed distribution and mixed copula frameworks, we generalise these frameworks to non-stationary conditions using three-parameter Weibull distributions. Seasonal low-flow distributions and their joint mixture vary over time, with linear non-stationarity in the location parameter and in inter-event dependence. Results are presented for more than 700 catchments from the European Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection (ROBIN) dataset. Model evaluation shows that neglecting non-stationarity when present can lead to biased assessments of low-flow severity, particularly for higher return periods. In contrast, non-stationary models provide a more realistic representation of evolving low-flow regimes by revealing temporal changes that remain hidden from traditional estimators. By preserving the conceptual consistency of the previous stationary framework, the proposed non-stationary framework improves the statistical characterisation of extreme low flows and provides an enhanced basis for low-flow frequency analysis by offering new insights into past and current low-flow processes under climate change.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Austrian Science Fund</funding-source>
<award-id>(R/VF) 10. 55776/DOC216</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Klima- und Energiefonds</funding-source>
<award-id>programme “ACRP” (grant no. C265154)</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e142">Frequency analysis (FA) is the most straightforward statistical approach for estimating the probability of hydrological extremes. In the context of low-flows, low-flow frequency analysis (LFA) is used to derive design low-flows associated with specific non-exceedence probabilities by fitting probability distributions to characteristic time series, most often annual minimum streamflow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.1"/>. The reliability of these estimates depends strongly on both sample size and the validity of the underlying model assumptions. Traditional LFA assumes that observations are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), implying (i) stationarity of the time series, (ii) homogeneity of the underlying generating processes, and (iii) absence of serial dependence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e151">(Weak) Stationarity implies that the statistical properties such as mean, variance or autocovariance of a hydrological series remain constant over time, such that probability distributions fitted to historical observations are assumed to remain valid for future conditions and throughout the design life span of water resources infrastructure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.3"/>. However, the validity of this assumption has been increasingly questioned over recent decades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.4"/>. Climate change-driven increases in temperature and shifts in precipitation regimes are projected to amplify both the frequency and severity of low-flow events, as highlighted in the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.5"/>. Empirical evidence from large sample studies supports this concern. Analyses of more than 1000 near-natural catchments across Europe, North and South America, and Australia, for the period 1975–2015, show that trends in extreme low-flow occurrence vary across climatic regions and low-flow regimes. While many regions exhibit no significant trends, statistically significant increases or decreases have been detected in specific cold- and warm-season regimes, with results depending on both the observation period and the dominant climatic drivers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.6"/>. These findings indicate that the assumption of stationarity can be violated in observed low-flow records, and ignoring non-stationarity when it is present may lead to biased and unreliable estimates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e169">Non-stationarity in FA can be addressed either by removing the detected trend in the time series or by introducing time or other covariates to model time-varying parameters. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.8"/> made an important contribution to the increasing awareness of non-stationarity in hydrological frequency analysis by considering parsimonious estimators that focus on a more homogeneous recent sub-period. Such approaches can reduce the influence of non-stationarity by using records that better represent current conditions. A complementary strategy is to retain the full record and represent non-stationarity explicitly by modelling time-varying parameters. This allows temporal change to be incorporated directly into the frequency model, but increases model complexity and therefore requires careful model selection to justify deviation from stationarity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.9"/>. Comprehensive reviews, such as those by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.10"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.11"/>, have summarised recent advances in non-stationary hydrological frequency analysis for design purposes, with primary emphasis on flood extremes but also acknowledging relevance for low flows. Within this literature, non-stationary flood frequency analysis (NSFFA) has explored a wide range of methodological approaches, including Generalised Extreme Value (GEV) probability distribution with time dependent parameters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.12"/>, regression-based frameworks linking annual maximum floods to external drivers of non-stationarity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.13"/>, modelling non-stationary dependence structures using dynamic copulas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.14"/>, and accounting for temporal changes in flood generating mechanisms and flood types <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e197">In contrast, methodological development for non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis (NSLFA) remains comparatively limited <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.16"/>. To date, only a small number of NSLFA studies have been reported. These include application of NSLFA to bivariate low-flow characteristics such as occurrence and severity in the Connecticut River Basin, USA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.17"/>. Additionally, NSLFA typically employs generalised additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), in which the parameters of the selected low-flow distribution are expressed as functions of time or climatic covariates to account for non-stationary behaviour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.18"/>. GAMLSS-based approaches provide a flexible framework for representing temporal variation in the distribution. However, they do not address the additional process heterogeneity that arises when annual low flows originate from distinct seasonal generating processes, nor the dependence that may exist between these seasonal components.</p>
      <p id="d2e210">This imbalance is particularly concerning given the substantial environmental and socioeconomic impacts of low flows. Low flows are a major driver of deterioration in river water quality worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.19"/>. Reduced streamflow increases water residence times and decreases flushing capacity, thereby enhancing pollutant accumulation and intensifying thermal and biogeochemical stress on aquatic ecosystems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.20"/>. Beyond ecological impacts, prolonged low-flow periods can constrain water availability for irrigation, reduce hydropower production, and disrupt inland navigation, leading to cascading socio-economic consequences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e222">An additional challenge in LFA arises in seasonal climates, where low flows are generated by fundamentally different processes. Summer low-flows are typically driven by precipitation deficits and high evaporative demand, whereas winter low-flows in snow-influenced catchments are often associated with snow accumulation, freezing conditions, or delayed melt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.22"/>. Consequently, the annual minimum low-flow represents a mixture of seasonal processes, violating the process homogeneity assumptions underlying traditional LFA. A mixed three-parameter Weibull distribution (LFA<sub>mix</sub>) approach has been proposed to address this issue by explicitly combining seasonal low-flow distributions within a unified annual framework, thereby preserving seasonal process information <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e240">However, the LFA<sub>mix</sub> approach assumes independence between seasonal low-flow, an assumption that may not hold in practice. Low-flow events can persist over long time scales, and droughts may extend across seasons, introducing dependence between summer and winter low-flows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.24"/>. Copula-based models provide a flexible framework for representing dependence structures independently of the marginal distributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.25"/> and are therefore well-suited for modelling seasonal low-flow dependence within the mixed distribution LFA framework. Within this context, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.26"/> demonstrated that the mixed copula approach (LFA<sub>mixC</sub>) represents a valid generalisation of LFA<sub>mix</sub> and is particularly advantageous in regions with strong seasonal correlation.</p>
      <p id="d2e280">Despite these advances, both LFA<sub>mix</sub> and LFA<sub>mixC</sub> have thus far been limited to stationary conditions. Under ongoing climate change, however, seasonal low-flow behaviour and its inter-seasonal dependence may evolve due to shifts in climatic drivers, snow dynamics or drought persistence. Ignoring such non-stationarity in the dependence structure may therefore lead to biased low-flow risk estimates, even when non-stationarity in the marginal distributions is considered. To address this limitation, the present study extends the mixed distribution and mixed copula framework to a non-stationary setting (NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub>), allowing time-dependent parameters in the seasonal marginal distributions, their mixture, and the seasonal dependence, thereby enabling a consistent representation of evolving low-flow behaviour in the presence of climate change.</p>
      <p id="d2e310">Within this paper, we address four key research questions: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e315">To what extent do seasonal low flows exhibit significant trends and non-stationary behaviour in Europe?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e319">How can non-stationary mixture distributions and non-stationary copula-based dependence be appropriately represented within a low-flow frequency analysis framework?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e323">What insights do non-stationary seasonal models provide into past and present changes in low-flow behaviour?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e327">How does explicitly accounting for non-stationarity affect estimates of design low flows compared to stationary low-flow frequency analysis?</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e330">The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the study area and data used in the analysis. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> outlines the proposed methodological NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> presents and discusses the results. Finally, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> summarises the main findings and highlights directions for future research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and study area</title>
      <p id="d2e358">The models developed in this study are evaluated using annual and seasonal low-flow data from 721 European catchments from the Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection (ROBIN) dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.27"/>. ROBIN represents high-quality streamflow records from national reference hydrometric networks (RHNs) and is specifically designed to minimise direct human influences that can obscure climate-driven variability. All selected catchments belong to the Level-1 network, prioritising long records from near-natural catchments with limited documented impacts from reservoirs, abstractions, and land-use change. Although residual human influences cannot be fully excluded, the use of RHNs substantially reduces non-climatic confounding effects and provides a robust basis for attributing observed low-flow variability and trends primarily to climatic drivers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.28"/>. This is particularly important for low-flow studies, where regulation and water management can otherwise dominate observed changes.</p>
      <p id="d2e367">The study domain covers a wide range of hydroclimatic conditions across Europe, including catchments located in Austria, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Finland, France, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Norway, Poland, and Sweden. To increase temporal coverage, the original ROBIN records were complemented with streamflow data from the Global Runoff Data Centre <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.29"/>, the Austrian Hydrographic Service <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.30"/>, and publicly available European CAMELS-type datasets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.31"/>. Only stations meeting comparable data-quality requirements and near-natural screening criteria were retained. All time series were harmonised to a common analysis period from 1976 to 2020, balancing spatial coverage with record length requirements for LFA. Annual and seasonal low-flow indices were derived from mean daily streamflow (m<sup>3</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>), with seasonal stratification of low flows defined following established continental-scale European conventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.32"/>, where summer is defined as the period from April to October and winter from November to March.</p>
      <p id="d2e404">The considered catchment areas range from less than 1 to more than 10 000 km<sup>2</sup> and mean elevations range between 20 and 3000 m a.s.l. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a–b, shows that the study catchments are predominantly small to medium-sized and located at low to mid elevations, with fewer large or high-elevation catchments. In addition to these physiographic characteristics, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>c highlights clear spatial patterns of summer, winter, and mixed low-flow regimes across Europe. Overall, the dataset spans a broad range of physiographic and hydroclimatic settings, providing a robust basis for comparative analyses of stationary and non-stationary low-flow settings.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e423">Catchment characteristics and low-flow regime classification for the study area. <bold>(a)–(b)</bold> show the distributions of catchment area and mean elevation (both on logarithmic scales). <bold>(c)</bold> show the spatial distribution of low-flow regimes derived using PAM clustering, distinguishing winter-dominated, summer-dominated, and mixed regimes.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e446">This section presents the framework of NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> developed in this study (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The workflow consists of (i) data pre-processing and seasonal stratification, (ii) testing for non-stationarity and inter-seasonal dependence, (iii) model selection based on likelihood-based criteria (iv) estimation of stationary and non-stationary marginal low-flow distributions, (v) estimation of stationary and non-stationary mixed distribution and mixed copula models, and (vi) model performance evaluation using gain metrics.</p><fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e462">Workflow of the NSLFA framework. The procedure includes data pre-processing and seasonal stratification, testing of statistical assumptions, fitting and comparing stationary and non-stationary marginal Weibull distributions, modelling seasonal dependence using either a mixed distribution or a mixed distribution-copula approach, and estimation of low-flow quantiles and probability plots.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Data pre-processing</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Delineation of homogeneous regions using partitioning around medoids (PAM)</title>
      <p id="d2e485">To support a hydrologically meaningful regional interpretation of seasonal low-flow regimes, homogeneous low-flow regimes were delineated using seasonality histograms (SH) and classified using partitive clustering based on the partitioning around medoids (PAM), which helps identify dominant hydrological controls, reduce heterogeneity, and improve model choice <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.33"/>. SH describe the seasonal distribution of low flows using 12 variables that represent monthly frequencies of low flows. Low-flow days were identified from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series, obtained by smoothing the daily discharge series with a 7 d moving average, using a catchment-specific threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the discharge exceeded on 95 % of days, which is a commonly used threshold in low-flow studies. A low-flow day is when its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e541">For each catchment, monthly occurrence frequencies were calculated as the ratio of low-flow days to total observations in each calendar month, yielding a 12-dimensional SH vector that captures the timing and shape of low-flow seasonality. These SH vectors were then grouped using PAM clustering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.35"/> with the number of clusters selected from the silhouette plot, which orders the silhouette width of each SH and reflects its similarity to the assigned cluster relative to the nearest alternative cluster. PAM clustering of seasonality histograms identifies whether low-flow events occur predominantly in summer, winter or both seasons, thereby providing regional evidence that annual low-flow minima may originate from different seasonal generating processes and supporting the need for a seasonal mixture framework. Clusters were interpreted based on the seasonal peaks of their medoid histograms to identify dominant seasonal low-flow regimes, whereas catchments with silhouette widths below 0.2 were considered to have weak cluster membership and were therefore classified as having mixed seasonality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.36"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Seasonal stratification</title>
      <p id="d2e558">The annual low-flow series (AM) consists of the minimum 7 d average streamflow observed in each hydrological year (April to March), obtained from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series. The moving average filter reduces short-term variability and is widely applied in low-flow studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.37"/>. Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote a sequence of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables with common distribution function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.38"/>. Under the conventional annual-minima approach, the annual low-flow series is defined as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            which implicitly assumes that annual low flows are generated by a homogeneous underlying process. However, in seasonal climates, low-flow events may arise from distinct hydrological processes operating in different seasons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.39"/>. In such cases, the annual minimum can be expressed as the minimum of the annual summer minima (AM<sub>S</sub>) and winter minima (AM<sub>W</sub>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.40"/>,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M23" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AM</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e696">For each catchment, the dependence between the annual summer and winter low-flow series was assessed using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.41"/>. Statistical significance was evaluated at the 5 % level, and correlations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were classified as non-significant. Only significant correlations were subsequently grouped, for interpretation purposes, into weak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), moderate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and strong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dependence classes. In addition, a mixture rate was calculated as the proportion of years in which the summer minimum 7 d flow was lower than the winter minimum 7 d flow. Based on this rate, catchments were classified as summer-dominated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), winter-dominated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or mixed (0.45–0.55). This provides a gradual measure of seasonal dominance at the individual-catchment scale, whereas PAM clustering yields a discrete classification into mutually exclusive regime groups <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Trend analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e797">In this study, non-stationarity is assessed by separately detecting trends in the summer (AM<sub>S</sub>) and winter (AM<sub>W</sub>) low-flow series using the non-parametric modified Mann-Kendall test with block bootstrapping (BBSMK) with block size determined from the number of contiguous significant serial correlations, plus an additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.43"/>. Compared to the original Mann-Kendall test, BBSMK preserves the original data structure, accounts for autocorrelation in the time series, and reduces the risk of false trend detection. Due to its resampling technique, the method is robust even for relatively short records <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.44"/>. A total of 2000 bootstrap replicates is generated to construct the empirical distribution of the Mann-Kendall test statistic. Statistical significance is evaluated using the empirical bootstrap confidence interval of the standardised test statistic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). A trend is considered significant at the 95 % confidence level when the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value lies outside the corresponding 95 % empirical bootstrap confidence interval. The magnitude of the trend is quantified using the Sen slope estimator, a robust non-parametric estimate of the monotonic rate of change based on the median of all pairwise slopes. Positive and negative values indicate increasing and decreasing trends, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.45"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework for low flows</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Stationary mixed copula approach for low flows</title>
      <p id="d2e881">The AM<sub>S</sub> and AM<sub>W</sub> are samples from two random variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (annual summer low flow) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (annual winter low flow). Under the assumption that summer and winter events are independent, the probability that the low-flow event is equal to or smaller than magnitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be obtained from its seasonal non-exceedance probabilities:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="2em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Given that the same discharge magnitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is inserted into both marginal distributions, the mixed probability estimator can be written as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M44" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            This estimator provides a valid generalisation of the annual-frequency estimator and yields improved probability estimates when the summer and winter distributions differ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.46"/>. Following the Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem, seasonal low-flow minima are modelled using three-parameter Weibull (WEI3) distributions for both summer and winter,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M45" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="2em"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            defined for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the location parameter, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the scale parameter, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the shape parameter of the WEI3 distribution. The parameters are estimated separately for each season by maximum likelihood (ML) which is adopted for its flexibility in accommodating changes in model structure, which is important for extending from stationary to non-stationary settings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1198">The multiplication rule assumes that the events in the two seasons are independent. However, this is not always the case, leading to a more general bivariate frequency problem in which the joint occurrence probability of events in two variables is required. This can be addressed using bivariate frequency analysis, in which a joint probability model is used to estimate the probability that both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> do not exceed given magnitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1279">To model the joint distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a copula-based approach is applied. A copula is a function that fully characterises the dependence structure between random variables independently of their marginal distributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.48"/>. Following Sklar’s theorem, the joint cumulative distribution function can be written as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes a bivariate copula.</p>
      <p id="d2e1385">In this study, the Gumbel-Hougaard copula was chosen, motivated by the pan-European comparative assessment of copula-based mixed estimators presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.49"/>. Although alternative families (e.g. Frank and Plackett) performed well for individual catchments, the Gumbel copula emerged as a robust and station-wide suitable model for capturing positive tail dependence in seasonal low-flow extremes and was therefore adopted for continental-scale applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.50"/>. Following this established evidence, and given that the focus of the present study is on extending the mixed copula framework to non-stationary conditions, alternative copula families are not re-evaluated here. The Gumbel copula is defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M58" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the pseudo-observations corresponding to the marginal probabilities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is directly related to Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1533">The copula-based mixed probability estimator for annual low-flow occurrences is obtained by inserting the same discharge magnitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into both marginal distributions and applying the AND-operator for minima. This yields

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1628">For the special case of independence (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the copula reduces to the independence copula and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such that Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) simplifies to the mixed distribution estimator in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). The mixed copula estimator therefore represents a valid generalisation of the mixed distribution approach for situations where summer and winter low flows are not independent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.51"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Non-stationary mixed copula approach for low flows</title>
      <p id="d2e1719">Under non-stationary conditions, both seasonal low-flow behaviour and the dependence between summer and winter low flows may change over time. To account for such changes, the mixed copula framework is extended to allow temporal variation in both the marginal distributions and the dependence structure.</p>
      <p id="d2e1722">Non-stationarity in seasonal low-flow behaviour is represented by allowing the location parameter of the marginal Weibull distributions to vary linearly with time, while keeping the scale and shape parameters constant. Allowing additional parameters to vary without strong empirical support substantially increases estimation uncertainty. Moreover, scaling analysis indicates that the moments of streamflow series (mean, variance, and skewness) are nearly perfectly related <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.52"/>, suggesting that independent temporal variation in scale and shape parameters would be inconsistent with these structural dependencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.53"/>.  Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the (annual) time index of the observation record. The time-dependent location parameter is then defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies the temporal trend in low-flow magnitude. Accordingly, the seasonal marginal distributions are expressed as time-dependent cumulative distribution functions,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M72" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="1em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with non-stationarity in both summer and winter low-flow series introduced through the time-varying location parameter of the WEI3 distribution. Assuming seasonal independence, the non-stationary mixed distribution for annual low flows is obtained by inserting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1918">To explicitly account for inter-seasonal dependence that may itself vary over time, a non-stationary copula-based estimator is adopted. As in the stationary case, a Gumbel-Hougaard copula is used to model positive dependence between seasonal low flows, but now with a time-variant parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The non-stationary copula is defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote time-dependent pseudo-observations and

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a standardized time covariate. This formulation ensures valid parameter values and allows for gradual changes in dependence strength over time, and assuming the observations are independent, the likelihood functions for the stationary and non-stationary WEI3 models are provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2179">The non-stationary copula-based mixed probability estimator for annual low-flow occurrences is then obtained analogously to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>). The non-stationary mixed copula estimator therefore represents a generalisation of both the stationary mixed copula approach and the non-stationary mixed distribution approach, allowing simultaneous representation of temporal changes in marginal low-flow behaviour and inter-seasonal dependence.</p>
      <p id="d2e2185">Design low-flow quantiles for a given return period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are finally obtained by numerical inversion of the time-dependent form of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) at selected time points, yielding time-dependent return levels that reflect evolving seasonal processes and dependence structures.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Model comparison</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Model selection using likelihood ratio test</title>
      <p id="d2e2211">Stationary and non-stationary marginal models are compared using the likelihood ratio (LR) test within a nested modelling framework, where M1 denotes the simpler stationary model and M2 the more complex non-stationary model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.54"/>. The LR deviance statistic is defined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the maximized log-likelihoods of the stationary and non-stationary models, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2287">Model selection follows a parsimony principle, whereby a non-stationary model is adopted only when the LR test indicates a statistically significant improvement over the stationary formulation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Model evaluation methods</title>
      <p id="d2e2299">Model evaluation follows the gain-based framework of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26" id="text.55"/>, in which deviations between alternative estimators are interpreted as relative gains or losses in accuracy rather than absolute errors. This interpretation reflects the fact that the true low-flow distribution is unknown and that models incorporating additional hydrological process information are considered conceptually superior to simpler representations. It should be noted that the interpretation of the deviation as a gain depends on the assumption that the model provides a more appropriate representation of the underlying low-flow process than the alternative model. The terminology is therefore used in the context of nested model comparisons, where the more complex formulation extends the simpler alternative. The evaluation is based on the differences in the estimated return periods for selected design events. As low flows represent minima, return periods are defined as the reciprocal of the non-exceedence probability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2321">In the stationary framework, model performance is evaluated by comparing return period estimates from one conventional model M1 with those from an extended model M2, e.g. the mixture model or mixture copula model. For a given return period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the corresponding annual low-flow quantile is first estimated from the conventional model M1 and then inserted into the alternative probability models M2 to obtain the associated return periods <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2352">The performance gain of the extended estimators relative to the conventional estimator is quantified using the relative deviation

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M88" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e2399">Positive values indicate that the conventional estimator overestimates the return period relative to the extended estimator. To avoid cancellation when aggregating results, the relative absolute deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rad</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rd</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is also reported. The added value of explicitly accounting for seasonal dependence is assessed by comparing the mixed distribution (M1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mixed copula estimators (M2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e2447">In the non-stationary framework, the same evaluation principle is applied, but return periods are evaluated at selected temporal snapshots <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. When rdT is used to compare two different time points within the non-stationary model, it should be interpreted as a distributional shift, expressed as a change in estimated return period, rather than as a performance gain. For either non-stationary approach, let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the time-dependent return period at snapshot <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Changes in low-flow severity between two snapshots, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are quantified as well as the difference between a stationary model and a non-stationary model with parameters at the end of the observation period.</p>
      <p id="d2e2557">Corresponding relative absolute deviations are additionally reported for aggregation. Together, these metrics quantify the added value of accounting for seasonal heterogeneity, seasonal dependence, and temporal non-stationarity in low-flow frequency analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Seasonal regimes, dependence, and trends</title>
      <p id="d2e2576">The classification of seasonality histograms with PAM clustering shows pronounced spatial low-flow regimes across Europe (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>c). Three regimes are identified: summer, winter, and mixed seasonality. Summer regimes dominate, comprising 82.5 % of the catchments, and are distributed mainly across western, central, and southern Europe. Their seasonal peaks between April and October indicate low-flow conditions primarily associated with warm-season precipitation deficits and high evaporative demand. This broad pattern is also in line with recent studies pointing to a contribution of internal multidecadal North Atlantic Variability to the warming of early spring droughts in Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.56"/>. Winter regimes account for 14.4 % of the catchments and occur mainly in northern Europe and mountainous regions, where peaks between November and March reflect the influence of snow accumulation and other cold-season hydrological processes. The remaining 3.1 % of catchments, classified as mixed seasonality based on silhouette widths below 0.2, indicating weak or less distinct seasonal dominance (Sect.<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1"/>). The classification is robust to the choice of silhouette-width threshold, with thresholds of 0.15 and 0.25 retaining 98.47 % and 98.89 % agreement, respectively, with the baseline threshold of 0.2, changes primarily affect the proportion of catchments classified as mixed. Additional sensitivity analyses of the clustering approach and seasonal definition similarly support the robustness of the dominant summer-winter structure, with detailed results provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>. This result is consistent with the mixture-rate analysis results shown in the Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>, which likewise highlights the predominance of summer low-flow conditions across the study domain.</p>
      <p id="d2e2590">Trend patterns also differ between the summer and winter low flow series. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a–b show that significant trends are more common in summer than in winter, occurring in 36.1 % and 18.1 % of catchments, respectively, while non-significant trends dominate overall, particularly in winter (82.1 %). This suggests a greater sensitivity of summer low flows to long-term hydrological change. In summer, decreasing trends dominate (73.8 % of significant cases) and are concentrated mainly in western, central, and southern Europe. In winter, decreasing trends are more frequent than increasing trends (59.2 %), but the share of increasing trends (40.8 %) is notably higher than in summer, particularly in northern Europe and snow-influenced regions. These patterns suggest that summer low flows are shaped by the combined effects of warming, enhanced evapotranspiration, drought intensification, and regional precipitation deficits, particularly in central Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.57"/>, whereas winter low flows reflect a more mixed response linked to snow processes and cold-season hydrological dynamics.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2600">Spatial distribution of statistical assumption tests and final model selection. <bold>(a)–(b)</bold> show significant and non-significant trends in summer and winter low-flow series across the study catchments, based on the block bootstrap Mann-Kendall test. <bold>(c)</bold> summarises dependence between seasonal low-flow using Kendall's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <bold>(d)</bold>, shows the final model decision, distinguishing stationary catchments from those requiring non-stationary modelling in summer, winter, or both seasons.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2626">The dependence analysis further shows that summer and winter low flows are neither fully independent nor strongly coupled across most catchments. Using the significance criterion and Kendall's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> classes defined in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2"/>, significantly low to moderate Kendall's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> correlations dominate the study domain (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c), accounting for 41.5 % and 25.9 % of catchments, respectively, whereas strong significant correlations are rare (0.1 %). Non-significant correlations are primarily confined to the low-correlation class (32.3 %), indicating that seasonal dependence is common but generally weak to moderate, implying that the two seasonal components often share part of the same hydro-climatic forcing while still retaining distinct behaviour.</p>
      <p id="d2e2647">Taken together, these results show that low-flow regimes across the study area are governed by different generating processes, varying degrees of seasonal dependence, and temporal dynamics, thereby highlighting the need for a low-flow frequency analysis framework that is flexible but also explicitly accounts for these conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Application and evaluation of the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Model selection and spatial distribution of non-stationarity</title>
      <p id="d2e2675">The first step in applying the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework is to fit the WEI3 distribution to the low-flow time series. The use of the WEI3 distribution is theoretically motivated by the Fisher-Tippett-Gnedenko theorem, as the Weibull distribution represents a limiting distribution for lower extremes with a finite lower bound and is therefore well established in low-flow frequency analysis. Nevertheless, departures from the fitted distribution may occur at individual catchments. Such departures are interpreted not only as a distributional issue, but also as a diagnostic indication of sample properties, particularly process heterogeneity between summer and winter low-flow generation. Alternative low-flow distributions may also provide suitable representations at individual catchments. However, the present study retains WEI3 because of its theoretical basis for lower extremes and its consistency with the established LFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework.</p>
      <p id="d2e2696">In this study, WEI3 with ML estimation converged to feasible parameter estimates in 76.1 % of catchments, indicating that the procedure is suitable for modelling low-flow behaviour in most cases. The remaining optimisation failures are likely related to the constrained parameter space, which may yield infeasible parameter combinations. The unsuccessful fits were distributed throughout the study domain rather than being concentrated in a single geographical region, while the successfully fitted catchments retained broad spatial coverage across Europe. Unsuccessfully fitted catchments tended to be smaller and generally had lower low-flow values relative to catchment area in the annual, summer, and winter series, with less year-to-year variability. Mean catchment elevation was similar between the two groups. The unsuccessful catchments also showed consistently higher positive L-skewness, indicating differences in the distributional shape of their low-flow series. These characteristics may contribute to the greater difficulty in estimating the WEI3 parameters within the constrained parameter space. Similar convergence issues have been reported in earlier low-flow studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.58"/>, suggesting that they arise from the estimation procedure rather than a general limitation of the WEI3 distribution itself. We also provide the corresponding spatial comparison and detailed catchment, low-flow, and distributional characteristics in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2704">After fitting the stationary and non-stationary WEI3 distributions to annual and seasonal low-flow data, the evidence supporting the more complex non-stationary formulation must be evaluated for each catchment to avoid overfitting and increased estimation bias. Based on the likelihood ratio test with 5 % significance level, comparing stationary and non-stationary WEI3 models, 84.5 % of summer catchments and 91.3 % of winter catchments favour the simpler stationary model, whereas 15.5 % and 8.7 %, respectively, show a statistically significant improvement when non-stationarity is introduced.</p>
      <p id="d2e2707">When combining the results of the likelihood ratio test and the Mann-Kendall trend test, the proportion of catchments classified as non-stationary in both cases decreases slightly to 12.2 % in summer and 7.7 % in winter, while the stationary model remains preferred in 87.8 % and 92.3 % of catchments, respectively. The reduction is expected, as the combined criterion is more restrictive and requires both improved statistical fit and evidence of temporal change. In addition, the Type-I error of statistical tests has to be considered. The results indicate that stationary formulations remain adequate for most catchments, while a non-negligible subset exhibits evidence of temporal change that cannot be ignored and justifies the more complex non-stationary representation, with a clearer signal in summer than in winter, which is consistent with the trend analysis presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2713">The spatial distribution of the model selection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>d) further shows that non-stationarity is spatially structured rather than randomly distributed across the study domain. Catchments classified as non-stationary in summer-only are more frequent and occur mainly in central and eastern Europe, whereas winter-only non-stationary catchments are less common and more scattered. Catchments requiring non-stationary modelling in both seasons are concentrated particularly in northern Europe and other snow-influenced regions, suggesting that temporal change there affects both seasonal components simultaneously. By contrast, stationary models dominate across much of western and central Europe, indicating that for most catchments the simpler stationary model remains sufficient.</p>
      <p id="d2e2718">The observed spatial structure therefore suggests that the detected non-stationarity may be linked to differences in low- flow generating processes across regions and catchment types. Although the ROBIN Level-1 network minimises direct human influence, low-flow regimes are strongly controlled by catchment storage and release processes, including soil and aquifer characteristics, recharge, evapotranspiration, vegetation, topography, and climate (Smakhtin, 2001). Therefore, residual effects from small abstractions, groundwater interactions, land- use change, local water management, reservoirs, or flow regulation cannot be fully excluded and may contribute to temporal changes in some catchments.</p>
      <p id="d2e2721">Overall, these results suggest that the proposed non-stationary framework is  particularly relevant for catchments with evident non-stationarity, even though it is not required for all catchments. Its value lies not in universally replacing stationary models, but in identifying and representing catchments where seasonal low-flow regimes exhibit temporal change. In this case, the stationarity assumption may be violated and should not be ignored in the frequency analysis. To keep the framework parsimonious, non-stationarity was introduced as a linear trend in the location parameter and was evaluated formally by comparing the non-stationary and stationary models using a likelihood-ratio test. The linear formulation was chosen as a simple and parsimonious way to represent gradual temporal change. Given the limited record length, more flexible non-linear formulations or time-varying scale and shape parameters would require stronger empirical support and could substantially increase estimation uncertainty and the risk of overfitting. More complex temporal dynamics, including regime shifts, accelerations, thresholds, or oscillatory behaviour linked to climatic variability, may also occur. Nonlinear formulations, change-point approaches, or climatic covariates could therefore be considered where sufficiently long records and supporting evidence are available. Therefore, NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> provides an extension of the stationary framework, preserving its conceptual basis while improving the representation of evolving low-flow conditions where non-stationarity is evident. Given that the stationary model remains a special case of the more complex non-stationary model, the non-stationary model provides a robust framework that can cover both sides.</p>
      <p id="d2e2733">Finally, intermittent-flow conditions relevant to the applicability of the WEI3-based framework were identified by comparing the ROBIN catchments used in this study with the intermittent-flow classifications of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.59"/>. There are 3.2 % of catchments that were classified as intermittent and were retained in the analysis. Because the WEI3 distribution is continuous and cannot explicitly represent a probability mass at zero, catchments with repeated zero-flow occurrences would require a modelling framework that accounts for zero flows, for example by treating zeros as censored observations within a mixed discrete-continuous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-moment framework <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.60"/>. However, explicitly accounting for these data conditions is beyond the scope of the current study..</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Catchment-scale application: illustrative case study</title>
      <p id="d2e2757">To illustrate the practical application of the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework, the catchment Stauf Vöckla at Traun in Upper Austria is used as a representative example. The catchment covers an area of 99.7 km<sup>2</sup> and has a mean elevation of 503 m a.s.l. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a shows the time series of observed summer and winter minimum flow. Trend analysis using BBMSK identified a significant decreasing trend in summer flow, whereas no significant trend was detected in winter. The catchment is further characterised by moderate seasonal dependence (Kendall's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a nearly balanced mixture rate (0.52), indicating a mixed seasonal low-flow regime. Stationary and non-stationary WEI3 distributions were then fitted separately to the annual series, used here as a reference model, and to the seasonal series. Based on the likelihood ratio and trend test, the non-stationary model was preferred for summer, whereas the stationary model was not rejected for winter. Notably, this seasonal contrast is already visible in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a, where temporal change is more evident in summer than in winter.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2796">Catchment Stauf Vöckla at Traun <bold>(a)</bold> Observed summer and winter minimum 7 d flows (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with corresponding Sen’s slope trend estimates. <bold>(b)</bold> Stationary WEI3 return period curves for summer, winter, annual, and seasonal mixture (independence and Gumbel copula) models. <bold>(c)</bold> Non-stationary WEI3 return level curves evaluated at the mid-point and final year of the record, including NS mixture and NS copula-mixture formulations. <bold>(d)</bold> Temporal evolution of the 100-year low-flow quantile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under non-stationary seasonal, annual, mixture, and mixture-copula models, illustrating how changes in seasonal regimes propagate into extreme low-flow behaviour.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2841">Under stationary conditions, five low-flow frequency models were fitted using WEI3 distribution and Gumbel-Hougaard copula following the framework of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26" id="text.61"/>: the annual, summer, winter, mixture, and mixture-copula models. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b shows the resulting stationary probability plot across different return periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The practical interpretation focuses mainly on the 100-year return period, which can be used as a stress-test or worst-case scenario in water management and infrastructure planning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.62"/>. In this study, the 100-year return period is used to compare the sensitivity of low-flow estimates to seasonality, dependence, and non-stationarity, while higher return periods are shown only for illustrative comparison of lower-tail behaviour.</p>
      <p id="d2e2860">For all models, estimated minimum flows decrease with increasing return period. Importantly, the annual curve lies above the mixture-based estimators, indicating that explicit representation of seasonal structure yields lower, and therefore more extreme, design low-flow estimates. The mixture and mixture-copula curves are very close, consistent with the catchment's moderate inter-seasonal dependence. Their differences are more visible at short return periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years), which are less relevant for design purposes. In this respect, this behaviour is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26" id="text.63"/> showing that under moderate seasonal dependence, the copula-based correction has only a limited influence, whereas larger differences would be expected for increased seasonal dependence between summer and winter low-flow components.</p>
      <p id="d2e2878">When non-stationarity is explicitly taken into account, the seasonal WEI3 location parameter is allowed to vary over time, while the scale and shape parameters are kept constant. For the copula-based formulation, the dependence parameter is also time-varying (Sect.<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2"/>). The effect of this formulation is illustrated by the non-stationary probability plot in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c. Because non-stationarity was detected in summer, but not in winter, the non-stationarity comparison is shown only for the annual, summer, mixture, and mixture-copula models. The probabilities are evaluated at two reference points: the midpoint in 1998 (dashed lines) and the end of the observation period in 2020 (solid lines) to capture more recent conditions. The separation between the dashed and solid lines indicates a downward shift in estimated low-flow magnitudes over time across all models. Notably, summer low flows were lower in 2020 than in 1998, confirming a shift in the summer low flow regime. At the same time, the mixture-copula model accounting for time-varying dependence yields similar behaviour to the stationary models, where the difference between the mixture and the copula-based mixture remains small. Overall, this Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c indicates that the temporal behaviour of the low-flow regime cannot be fully described under a stationary assumption.</p>
      <p id="d2e2887">This temporal change becomes even clearer when examining the evolution of extreme low-flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the full observation period. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>d shows that all non-stationary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates decline over time, indicating a general intensification of low-flow conditions. At the beginning of the record, the summer curve lies above the winter curve, implying that winter low flows are initially more severe than summer low flows. Over time, however, the two seasonal curves then converge around the middle of the period, and towards the end of the period, the summer curve falls below the winter curve. This clearly shows a gradual shift from winter dominance to summer dominance. The annual, mixture, and mixture-copula estimates closely track this transition and remain very similar throughout, suggesting that for this catchment the effect of seasonal dependence on the long-term evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively small compared with the overall temporal decline. Comparing return periods from the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>) between the start of the observation period in 1976 and its end in 2020 suggests a substantial increase in the frequency of extreme low flows within the observed record. In particular, an event corresponding to a 100-year return period in 1976 is associated with a return period of about 43 years by 2020, indicating that such an event became approximately on average 2.3 times as frequent according to the fitted non-stationary model. This comparison is a statistical diagnostic of change within the historical observation period and should not be interpreted as a projection of future event frequency.</p>
      <p id="d2e2937">To further illustrate the framework under contrasting hydro-climatic conditions, we analysed the catchment Oksfjordvatn in Norway as a second example. Unlike Stauf Vöckla, which represents a mixed seasonal regime (mixture rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.52), Oksfjordvatn is winter-dominated (mixture rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.40) and exhibits weaker inter-seasonal dependence (Kendall's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared with 0.48 at Stauf Vöckla). The temporal behaviour also differs between the two catchments. At Stauf Vöckla, non-stationarity is mainly associated with declining summer low flows, whereas at Oksfjordvatn both summer and winter components were identified as non-stationary and low-flow magnitudes increase over time. Consequently, the non-stationary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates decrease through time at Stauf Vöckla, indicating increasingly severe low-flow conditions, but increase at Oksfjordvatn, indicating less severe low-flow conditions toward the end of the observation period. The corresponding four-panel analysis for Oksfjordvatn is provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2979">Overall, both examples demonstrate how the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework captures seasonal contrasts, temporal shifts, and dependence effects within a single coherent analysis. It also illustrates that non-stationarity may alter not only the magnitude of design low flows, but also the relative importance of summer and winter contributions to the annual low-flow regime.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Performance evaluation and model gains</title>
      <p id="d2e3000">In the following, we assess the performance of the full non-stationary framework across European catchments. A benchmark comparison of the stationary annual and stationary mixture-based estimators is provided in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S6"/>. As the main focus here is the extension to non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis, the detailed stationary benchmark is not discussed further in the main text.</p>
      <p id="d2e3005">Building on the stationary comparison, we conduct three assessments to quantify the impact of non-stationarity modelling on low-flow return-period estimates. First, for catchments with evident non-stationarity, we compare return-period estimates for the beginning (1976) and end (2020) of the observation period. The resulting relative absolute deviations are summarised across catchments, and are reported in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>, thereby quantifying the temporal shift captured by the non-stationary framework. A clear pattern emerges: the deviations are largest for high return periods and decrease steadily towards more frequent events. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, the median relative absolute deviation is 41.73 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 41.99 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years the medians remain high at 32.72 % and 34.71 %, respectively. Even at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, the median deviations still reach about 20 %–26 %, and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years they remain close to 9 %–12 %. This indicates that between 1976 and 2020, the estimated return periods of low-flow events changed markedly in catchments with evident non-stationarity, particularly for rare events. It also implies that low-flow events classified as very rare in 1976, may have very different recurrence characteristics by 2020. The largest changes occur in the upper tail of the distribution, indicating that temporal change affects the severity assessment of extreme low-flow events more strongly than that of frequent events. Depending on the direction of change, a low-flow event of fixed magnitude may therefore have become either more frequent or less frequent by 2020.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3094">Summary statistics of the relative absolute deviation (%) of the non-stationary mixture-based estimators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the beginning and end of the observation period for catchments with evident non-stationarity.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Estimator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">First Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Third Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IQR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2511.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">32.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">62.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">836.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">24.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">47.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">310.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">42.58</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">178.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">33.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">70.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2511.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">67.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">34.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">833.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">27.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">53.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">313.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">47.25</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">186.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">36.18</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">62.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">13.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3612">By comparison, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> provides a practical measure of how far a stationary model can depart from a non-stationary formulation under recent conditions in catchments with evident non-stationarity. While this does not establish the error in an absolute sense, it does quantify the discrepancy incurred when temporal change is ignored. The same overall pattern is observed, with the largest deviations again occurring for high return periods and smaller deviations for more frequent events. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, the median relative absolute deviation is 29.42 % for both estimator pairs, while for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years it remains around 23 %. At lower return periods, the differences decrease further, but remain non-negligible, reaching about 11 %–14 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years and 4 %–6 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years. In practical terms, this means that, in catchments where non-stationarity is evident, stationary estimates may differ by around 30 % or more from non-stationary estimates for rare events. Compared with the previous assessment, these deviations are systematically smaller, as the earlier comparison captures the full temporal shift between 1976 and 2020 within the non-stationary framework, whereas the present one contrasts a fixed stationary estimate with the non-stationary estimate at a single point in time. Accordingly, the former describes temporal evolution, while the latter indicates the potential bias from representing recent low-flow conditions with a stationary model.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3668">Summary statistics of the relative absolute deviation (%) between the stationary estimators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their non-stationary counterparts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, evaluated at the end of the observation period for catchments with evident non-stationarity.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Estimator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">First Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Third Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IQR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2535.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">66.31</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1183.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">49.76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">36.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">532.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">31.49</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">303.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">21.73</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">57.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">71.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2524.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">61.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1168.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">54.75</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">517.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">34.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">290.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">26.98</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4317">Compared with the subset of catchments showing evident non-stationarity, however, the deviations are systematically smaller once all catchments are included. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TG1"/> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years, for example, the median deviation decreases from 29.42 % to about 25.2 %, and the same reduction appears at all return periods. This is consistent with expectations, because the full sample also includes catchments where non-stationarity is weak (or not significant). Including those catchments naturally reduces the overall contrast between stationary and non-stationary formulations. As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>, deviations between stationary and non-stationary estimates are generally small for frequent events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years), but become much larger and more widespread for rare events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years), both in catchments with evident non-stationarity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a–b) and across the full set of catchments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c–d). In that sense, the pan-European comparison provides a more conservative estimate of the average effect of non-stationarity modelling.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4367">Spatial comparison of stationary and non-stationary return-period estimates across European catchments. Panels <bold>(a)–(b)</bold> show the relative deviation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the non-stationary end-of-period estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">end</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for catchments classified as non-stationary; panels <bold>(c)–(d)</bold> show the same comparison for all catchments.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4413">Another notable result across all three comparisons is that the two mixture-based models remain very similar: The summary statistics for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as for the stationary versus non-stationary comparisons, differ only slightly. This suggests that the dominant effect arises from introducing temporal non-stationarity itself, rather than from the distinction between the mixture and mixture-copula formulations. In other words, once seasonal structure is already represented, the largest additional change arises from allowing the distribution parameters to vary with time and not by considering the dependency of events.</p>
      <p id="d2e4449">Overall, the results show that non-stationarity modelling has a tangible impact on low-flow frequency estimation, particularly for rare events. The largest deviations occur when the full temporal shift within the non-stationary framework is considered in catchments with evident non-stationarity, smaller but still substantial deviations arise when stationary and non-stationary formulations are compared under recent conditions in the same subset of catchments, and somewhat smaller deviations again are found when this comparison is extended to all catchments. This progression is physically plausible and suggests that the strongest benefits of non-stationary modelling are concentrated in catchments where temporal change is most evident, while the broader European data set still shows a meaningful overall effect.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e4462">This study developed and evaluated the non-stationary seasonal low-flow frequency analysis framework NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub>, extending the stationary mixture and mixture-copula approaches to a non-stationary setting. The framework provides a consistent and unified way to represent seasonal low-flow behaviour, inter-seasonal dependence, and temporal change, and is particularly relevant where key assumptions of traditional low-flow frequency analysis are violated due to process heterogeneity and non-stationarity.</p>
      <p id="d2e4474">The results show that non-stationary behaviour is evident in in approximately 10 % of the near-natural European catchments used in this study, although its strength varies across regions and return periods. In the present application, non-stationarity is introduced through the location parameter, so temporal change is represented mainly as a shift in the lower bound of the seasonal low-flow distribution. Comparisons between the beginning and end of the observation period indicate that return period estimates can change significantly within the historical record, especially for rare events, implying that low-flow events considered very rare at the start of the record may have substantially different recurrence characteristics under recent conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e4477">The comparison with stationary formulations further shows that ignoring non-stationarity can lead to substantial differences, particularly in catchments where temporal change is evident and especially for high return periods. At the same time, the non-stationary analysis confirms that the largest gain still comes from explicitly representing seasonal low-flow structure, while the additional refinement from the mixture copula-based approach is generally smaller. Overall, the results suggest a clear hierarchy of model gains: the largest improvement comes from accounting for seasonal process heterogeneity, followed by temporal non-stationarity, whereas the added gain from modelling inter-seasonal dependence is more modest. In this sense, NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> provides a coherent and flexible framework for describing historical changes in low-flow frequency behaviour across diverse European hydro-climatic settings.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Limitations and future work</title>
      <p id="d2e4496">Some limitations should be noted. In the present study, non-stationarity is introduced only through the location parameter. While this parsimonious formulation is attractive for interpretation and large-sample application, it may be insufficient since variability can also change over time. Moreover, the non-stationary model is used here solely to describe historical change and is not intended to predict future trends. A further challenge is that non-stationary models generally require sufficiently long data records to estimate temporal changes in a robust way. Where records are short, the additional parameters introduced by non-stationary formulations may be difficult to estimate, increase uncertainty and reduce the reliability of inferred trends. This is particularly relevant in low-flow applications, where data scarcity and limited record length remain common in many catchments.</p>
      <p id="d2e4499">These limitations point to several directions for future work. An important next step is to investigate whether temporal changes in low-flow variability can be represented parsimoniously as consequential changes associated with shifts in the mean, rather than by independently varying additional distribution parameters, while remaining consistent with the underlying physical processes driving change. Further work should also aim to more directly link the inferred temporal changes to physical drivers, such as temperature, precipitation deficits, snow processes, evaporative demand, catchment storage dynamics, and large-scale climate variability. It would also be useful to extend it to multivariate settings, such as low flow and high water temperature, which would be valuable given its relevance for aquatic ecosystem health. In addition, the present framework is developed using WEI3, supported by its theoretical basis for lower extremes and its established use in low-flow frequency analysis. Extending the framework to alternative marginal distributions would provide a useful assessment of its broader applicability. Finally, it would be useful to examine more explicitly how non-stationary low-flow frequency estimates can contribute to drought management, environmental flow assessment, and water-resources planning under changing climatic conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Maximum-likelihood estimation</title>
      <p id="d2e4515">The parameters of the three-parameter Weibull (WEI3) distribution are estimated by maximum likelihood separately for the summer and winter low-flow series. Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote a seasonal sample of low-flow minima.</p>
      <p id="d2e4543">In the stationary case, the location parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant over time, and the log-likelihood function is given by

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>A1</label><mml:math id="M181" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        defined for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4712">In the non-stationary case, temporal variation in low-flow behaviour is introduced through a time-dependent location parameter,

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>A2</label><mml:math id="M185" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        while the scale and shape parameters are assumed constant. The corresponding log-likelihood function becomes

          <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S1.E18" content-type="numbered"><label>A3</label><mml:math id="M186" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4918">In both cases, parameter estimation is carried out by minimising the negative log-likelihood subject to the constraints <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and valid support of the distribution.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Sensitivity analysis of the seasonal low flow classification</title>

<table-wrap id="TB1"><label>Table B1</label><caption><p id="d2e4957">Sensitivity of the low-flow seasonality classification to the silhouette-width threshold used to identify catchments with mixed seasonality. The baseline threshold is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Agreement refers to the percentage of catchments retaining the same classification as under the baseline threshold.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Threshold</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Winter (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Summer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Summer (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mixed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Mixed (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Agreement (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">605</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">84.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">97.78</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">603</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">83.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">98.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">104</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">594</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">100.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">588</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">81.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">98.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">575</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">79.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">95.97</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TB2"><label>Table B2</label><caption><p id="d2e5214">Sensitivity of the physical interpretation of the PAM clusters to the seasonal definition. The baseline defines summer as April–October and winter as November–March.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seasonal Definition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Cluster 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cluster 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Agreement (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Apr–Oct/Nov–Mar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">May–Oct/Nov–Apr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Apr–Sep/Oct–Mar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Summer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">100.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Low flow regime classification with Mixture rate</title>

      <fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e5320">Spatial distribution of the dominant seasonal low-flow regime across the study catchments based on the mixture rate.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <label>Appendix D</label><title>Spatial and hydrological characteristics of WEI3 fitting outcomes</title>

      <fig id="FD1"><label>Figure D1</label><caption><p id="d2e5343">Spatial distribution of catchments with successful and unsuccessful WEI3 fits with MLE across the European study domain.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<table-wrap id="TD1"><label>Table D1</label><caption><p id="d2e5358">Comparison of catchment characteristics, low-flow characteristics and distributional shape between catchments with successful and unsuccessful WEI3 fits. Values are reported as median [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>3]. Low-flow values are normalized by catchment area. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values are based on Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Characteristic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Successful</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Unsuccessful</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Catchment area (km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">163.63 [83.60–494.50]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">91.50 [44.15–247.21]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean catchment elevation (m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">349.82 [172.39–599.30]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">350.00 [125.28–587.44]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.291</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Low-flow magnitude and variability </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Median annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L s<sup>−1</sup> km<sup>−2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.80 [1.60–4.21]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.69 [0.85–3.31]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Median summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L s<sup>−1</sup> km<sup>−2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.97 [1.64–4.62]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.93 [0.87–3.76]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Median winter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L s<sup>−1</sup> km<sup>−2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.86 [2.96–7.71]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.27 [2.06–5.83]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IQR annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L s<sup>−1</sup> km<sup>−2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.26 [0.86–2.00]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.87 [0.51–1.39]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col4">Distributional shape </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Annual L-skewness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.13 [0.06–0.19]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22 [0.12–0.32]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Summer L-skewness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.14 [0.08–0.20]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.23 [0.13–0.32]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Winter L-skewness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16 [0.09–0.22]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.26 [0.17–0.34]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S5">
  <label>Appendix E</label><title>Contrasting catchment example: Oksfjordvatn, Norway</title>

      <fig id="FE1"><label>Figure E1</label><caption><p id="d2e5800">Application of the NSLFA<sub>mixC</sub> framework to Oksfjordvatn, Norway. <bold>(a)</bold> Observed summer and winter minimum flows with corresponding Sen's slope trends. <bold>(b)</bold> Stationary WEI3 low-flow frequency estimates for the annual, summer, winter, mixture, and mixture-copula models. <bold>(c)</bold> Non-stationary low-flow frequency estimates evaluated at the midpoint (1998) and end (2020) of the observation period. <bold>(d)</bold> Temporal evolution of the estimated 100-year low-flow quantile (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the observation period.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S6">
  <label>Appendix F</label><title>Performance gains of the stationary modelling</title>
      <p id="d2e5855">The stationary benchmark comparison confirms the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.64"/>, with the main added value of the present analysis being the use of an extended and more recent observation period. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TF1"/>, both mixture-based estimators deviate from the annual estimator, especially at high return periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the differences decrease toward more frequent events (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as also illustrated in Fig.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="FF1"/>a–b. These findings support the conclusion that a conventional annual distribution may not adequately capture the combined influence of distinct summer and winter low-flow generating processes. In addition, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TF2"/> further shows that differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally small for the most extreme events in most catchments, suggesting that seasonal dependence has only a minor influence in the distribution tail. For more frequent events, however, the deviations become more pronounced, indicating that dependence plays a more visible role outside the most extreme conditions.</p>

<table-wrap id="TF1"><label>Table F1</label><caption><p id="d2e5918">Summary statistics of the relative absolute deviation (%) of the stationary mixture-based estimators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the conventional annual estimator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Estimator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">First Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Third Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">IQR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">85.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1324.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">79.15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">651.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55.59</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">29.87</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">247.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">114.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5.24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">32.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1335.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">80.68</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">60.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">661.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">55.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">256.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.97</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">121.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">18.23</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TF2"><label>Table F2</label><caption><p id="d2e6352">Summary statistics of relative deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rd</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the mix and the mix copula estimator (in %).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Min</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">First Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Third Quantile</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<fig id="FF1"><label>Figure F1</label><caption><p id="d2e6577">Spatial comparison of stationary models return-period estimates across European catchments. <bold>(a, b)</bold> show the relative deviation between the annual estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the stationary mixed distribution-copula estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for return periods of 2 and 100 years.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6599/2026/hess-30-6599-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S7">
  <label>Appendix G</label><title>Model gain between stationary and non-stationary estimators for all catchments</title>

<table-wrap id="TG1"><label>Table G1</label><caption><p id="d2e6621">Summary statistics of the relative absolute deviation (%) between the stationary estimators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and their non-stationary counterparts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, evaluated at the end of the observation period for all catchments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Estimator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Years)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">First Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Median</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Third Quantile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Max</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">IQR</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1163.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74.02</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">56.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">607.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">53.29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.98</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">225.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">29.54</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">114.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">20.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mixC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">25.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">78.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1236.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">60.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">626.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">56.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">38.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">244.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">34.42</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">26.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">127.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">23.85</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mix</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7276">The present study uses publicly available data of European streamflow records obtained from the Reference Observatory of Basins for INternational hydrological climate change detection (ROBIN) dataset, Global Runoff Data Centre (GRDC), Austrian Hydrographic Service (eHYD), European CAMELS-type datasets. The analysis code is available on Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19406599</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.65"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7288">FSF: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing (original draft preparation); SF: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing (review and editing), JL: Resources, Writing (review and editing), GW: Supervision, Funding acquisition, GL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing (review and editing).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7294">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7300">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7306">The work of Farhana Sweeta Fitriana was supported by the Doctoral School “Human River Systems in the 21st Century (HR21)” of BOKU University, Vienna. We also thank the editor, Elena Toth, and the reviewers: Chuck Kroll and an anonymous reviewer, for their constructive comments and suggestions, which helped improve the final manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7311">This research has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (grant no. (R/VF) 10. 55776/DOC216) and the Klima- und Energiefonds (programme “ACRP”, grant no. C265154).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7317">This paper was edited by Elena Toth and reviewed by Chuck Kroll and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ahn and Palmer(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Ahn, K.-H. and Palmer, R. N.: Use of a nonstationary copula to predict future bivariate low flow frequency in the Connecticut river basin, Hydrol. Process., 30, 3518–3532, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bayazit(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Bayazit, M.: Nonstationarity of hydrological records and recent trends in trend analysis: a state-of-the-art review, Environmental Processes, 2, 527–542, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bhatti et al.(2019)Bhatti, Kroll, and Vogel</label><mixed-citation>Bhatti, S. J., Kroll, C. N., and Vogel, R. M.: Revisiting the probability distribution of low streamflow series in the United States, J. Hydrol. Eng., 24, 04019043, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001844</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Casado Rodríguez(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Casado Rodríguez, J.: CAMELS-ES: Catchment Attributes and Meteorologyfor Large-Sample Studies – Spain, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8428374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.8428374</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Chebana and Ouarda(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Chebana, F. and Ouarda, T. B.: Multivariate non-stationary hydrological frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 593, 125907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125907</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Coles et al.(2001)Coles, Bawa, Trenner, and Dorazio</label><mixed-citation>Coles, S., Bawa, J., Trenner, L., and Dorazio, P.: An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, vol. 208, Springer, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Delaigue et al.(2025)Delaigue, Guimarães, Brigode, Génot, Perrin, Soubeyroux, Janet, Addor, and Andréassian</label><mixed-citation>Delaigue, O., Guimarães, G. M., Brigode, P., Génot, B., Perrin, C., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Janet, B., Addor, N., and Andréassian, V.: CAMELS-FR dataset: a large-sample hydroclimatic dataset for France to explore hydrological diversity and support model benchmarking, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Delgado et al.(2010)Delgado, Apel, and Merz</label><mixed-citation>Delgado, J. M., Apel, H., and Merz, B.: Flood trends and variability in the Mekong river, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 407–418, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-407-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-407-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Du et al.(2015)Du, Xiong, Xu, Gippel, Guo, and Liu</label><mixed-citation> Du, T., Xiong, L., Xu, C.-Y., Gippel, C. J., Guo, S., and Liu, P.: Return period and risk analysis of nonstationary low-flow series under climate change, J. Hydrol., 527, 234–250, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>eHYD(2025)</label><mixed-citation>eHYD: eHYD – der Zugang zu hydrographischen Daten Österreichs, <uri>https://ehyd.gv.at/</uri> (last access: 21 November 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Fischer and Schumann(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Fischer, S. and Schumann, A. H.: Temporal changes in the frequency of flood types and their impact on flood statistics, J. Hydrol., 22, 100171,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100171</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Fitriana et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Fitriana, F. S., Fischer, S., and Laaha, G.: Code to “Non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis with mixed Weibull components and Copula-based dependence framework”, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19406599</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Floriancic et al.(2021)Floriancic, Berghuijs, Molnar, and Kirchner</label><mixed-citation>Floriancic, M. G., Berghuijs, W. R., Molnar, P., and Kirchner, J. W.: Seasonality and drivers of low flows across Europe and the United States, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2019WR026928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026928" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019WR026928</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Graham et al.(2024)Graham, Bierkens, and van Vliet</label><mixed-citation>Graham, D. J., Bierkens, M. F., and van Vliet, M. T.: Impacts of droughts and heatwaves on river water quality worldwide, J. Hydrol., 629, 130590, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130590</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>GRDC(2025)</label><mixed-citation>GRDC: Global Runoff Data Centre, <uri>https://grdc.bafg.de/</uri> (last access: 21 November 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Haslinger and Mayer(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Haslinger, K. and Mayer, K.: Early spring droughts in Central Europe: Indications for atmospheric and oceanic drivers, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 24, e1136, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/asl.1136</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Hodgkins et al.(2024)Hodgkins, Renard, Whitfield, Laaha, Stahl, Hannaford, Burn, Westra, Fleig, Araújo Lopes et al.</label><mixed-citation>Hodgkins, G. A., Renard, B., Whitfield, P. H., Laaha, G., Stahl, K., Hannaford, J., Burn, D. H., Westra, S., Fleig, A. K., Araújo Lopes, W. T., Murphy, C., Mediero, L., and Hanel, M.:  Climate driven trends in historical extreme low streamflows on four continents, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2022WR034326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022WR034326</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Höge et al.(2023)Höge, Kauzlaric, Siber, Schönenberger, Horton, Schwanbeck, Floriancic, Viviroli, Wilhelm, Sikorska-Senoner et al.</label><mixed-citation>Höge, M., Kauzlaric, M., Siber, R., Schönenberger, U., Horton, P., Schwanbeck, J., Floriancic, M. G., Viviroli, D., Wilhelm, S., Sikorska-Senoner, A. E., Addor, N., Brunner, M., Pool, S., Zappa, M., and Fenicia, F.: CAMELS-CH: hydro-meteorological time series and landscape attributes for 331 catchments in hydrologic Switzerland, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5755–5784, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Ionita and Nagavciuc(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Ionita, M. and Nagavciuc, V.: Forecasting low flow conditions months in advance through teleconnection patterns, with a special focus on summer 2018, Sci. Rep., 10, 13258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70060-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-70060-8</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Kaufman and Rousseeuw(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. J.: Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-31748-8, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Kendall(1976)</label><mixed-citation> Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edn., Griffin, London, ISBN 978-0-85264-199-6, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Klein et al.(2010)Klein, Schumann, and Pahlow</label><mixed-citation>Klein, B., Schumann, A. H., and Pahlow, M.: Copulas–new risk assessment methodology for dam safety, in: Flood risk assessment and management: How to specify hydrological loads, their consequences and uncertainties, 149–185, Springer, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_8</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Laaha(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Laaha, G.: Modelling summer and winter droughts as a basis for estimating river low flows, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication, 289–296, ISBN 978-1-901502-81-7, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Laaha(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Laaha, G.: Process based regionalisation of low flows, PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien, <uri>https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-13474</uri> (last access: 25 May 2025), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Laaha(2023a)</label><mixed-citation>Laaha, G.: A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 1: Concept, performance, and effect of seasonality, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 689–701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-689-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-27-689-2023</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Laaha(2023b)</label><mixed-citation>Laaha, G.: A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2019–2034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Laaha and Blöschl(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Laaha, G. and Blöschl, G.: A comparison of low flow regionalisation methods–catchment grouping, J. Hydrol., 323, 193–214, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Laaha and Blöschl(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Laaha, G. and Blöschl, G.: A national low flow estimation procedure for Austria, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52, 625–644, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Laaha et al.(2017)Laaha, Gauster, Tallaksen, Vidal, Stahl, Prudhomme, Heudorfer, Vlnas, Ionita, Van Lanen et al.</label><mixed-citation>Laaha, G., Gauster, T., Tallaksen, L. M., Vidal, J.-P., Stahl, K., Prudhomme, C., Heudorfer, B., Vlnas, R., Ionita, M., Van Lanen, H. A. J., Adler, M.-J., Caillouet, L., Delus, C., Fendekova, M., Gailliez, S., Hannaford, J., Kingston, D., Van Loon, A. F., Mediero, L., Osuch, M., Romanowicz, R., Sauquet, E., Stagge, J. H., and Wong, W. K.: The European 2015 drought from a hydrological perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3001–3024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3001-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-3001-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lee et al.(2023)Lee, Calvin, Dasgupta, Krinmer, Mukherji, Thorne, Trisos, Romero, Aldunce, Barret et al.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., Trisos, C., Romero, J., Aldunce, P., Barrett, K., Blanco, G., Cheung, W. W. L., Connors, S. L., Denton, F., Diongue-Niang, A., Dodman, D., Garschagen, M., Geden, O., Hayward, B., Jones, C., Jotzo, F., Krug, T., Lasco, R., Lee, J.-Y., Masson-Delmotte, V., Meinshausen, M., Mintenbeck, K., Mokssit, A., Otto, F. E. L., Pathak, M., Pirani, A., Poloczanska, E., Pörtner, H.-O., Revi, A., Roberts, D. C., Roy, J., Ruane, A. C., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., Slade, R., Slangen, A., Sokona, Y., Sörensson, A. A., Tignor, M., van Vuuren, D., Wei, Y.-M., Winkler, H., Zhai, P., and Zommers, Z.: Synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Longer report, IPCC, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Loritz et al.(2024)Loritz, Dolich, Acuña Espinoza, Ebeling, Guse, Götte, Hassler, Hauffe, Heidbüchel, Kiesel et al.</label><mixed-citation>Loritz, R., Dolich, A., Acuña Espinoza, E., Ebeling, P., Guse, B., Götte, J., Hassler, S. K., Hauffe, C., Heidbüchel, I., Kiesel, J., Mälicke, M., Müller-Thomy, H., Stölzle, M., and Tarasova, L.: CAMELS-DE: hydro-meteorological time series and attributes for 1582 catchments in Germany, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5625–5642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Milly et al.(2008)Milly, Betancourt, Falkenmark, Hirsch, Kundzewicz, Lettenmaier, and Stouffer</label><mixed-citation> Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?, Science, 319, 573–574, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Montanari et al.(2013)Montanari, Young, Savenije, Hughes, Wagener, Ren, Koutsoyiannis, Cudennec, Toth, Grimaldi et al.</label><mixed-citation>Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec, C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer, B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G., Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A., Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z., and Belyaev, V.: “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society – The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2013.809088</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Mosley(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Mosley, L. M.: Drought impacts on the water quality of freshwater systems; review and integration, Earth-Sci. Rev., 140, 203–214, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Önöz and Bayazit(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Önöz, B. and Bayazit, M.: Block bootstrap for Mann–Kendall trend test of serially dependent data, Hydrol. Process., 26, 3552–3560, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Patakamuri et al.(2020)Patakamuri, O'Brien, and Patakamuri</label><mixed-citation>Patakamuri, S. K., O'Brien, N., and Patakamuri, M. S. K.: Package “modifiedmk”, Cran, R-project, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.modifiedmk" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32614/CRAN.package.modifiedmk</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Salas et al.(2018)Salas, Obeysekera, and Vogel</label><mixed-citation> Salas, J., Obeysekera, J., and Vogel, R.: Techniques for assessing water infrastructure for nonstationary extreme events: A review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 325–352, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Sen(1968)</label><mixed-citation> Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Serago and Vogel(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Serago, J. M. and Vogel, R. M.: Parsimonious nonstationary flood frequency analysis, Adv. Water Resour., 112, 1–16, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Sklar(1959)</label><mixed-citation> Sklar, M.: Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges, in: Annales de l'ISUP, 8, 229–231, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Stahl et al.(2010)Stahl, Hisdal, Hannaford, Tallaksen, Van Lanen, Sauquet, Demuth, Fendekova, and Jódar</label><mixed-citation>Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J., Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., and Jódar, J.: Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Stedinger(1993)</label><mixed-citation> Stedinger, J. R.: Frequency analysis of extreme events, Handbook of hydrology, ISBN 978-0-07-039732-3, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Tallaksen and Laaha(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Tallaksen, L. M. and Laaha, G.: Frequency analysis, in: Hydrological Drought: Processes and Estimation Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater, 2nd edn., edited by: Tallaksen, L. M. and van Lanen, H. A. J., Chapter 6, 233–304, Elsevier, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819082-1.00003-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/B978-0-12-819082-1.00003-5</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Tallaksen and Van Lanen(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Tallaksen, L. M. and van Lanen, H. A. J. (Eds.): Hydrological Drought: Processes and Estimation Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater, 2nd edn., Elsevier, 684 pp., ISBN 978-0-12-819082-1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03464-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/C2017-0-03464-X</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Tramblay et al.(2021)Tramblay, Rutkowska, Sauquet, Sefton, Laaha, Osuch, Albuquerque, Alves, Banasik, Beaufort et al.</label><mixed-citation>Tramblay, Y., Rutkowska, A., Sauquet, E., Sefton, C., Laaha, G., Osuch, M., Albuquerque, T., Alves, M. H., Banasik, K., Beaufort, A., Brocca, L., Camici, S., Csabai, Z., Dakhlaoui, H., DeGirolamo, A. M., Dörflinger, G., Gallart, F., Gauster, T., Hanich, L., Kohnová, S., Mediero, L., Ninov, P., Parry, S., Quintana-Seguí, P., Tzoraki, O., and Datry, T.: Trends in flow intermittence for European rivers, Hydrol. Sci. J., 66, 37–49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1849708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2020.1849708</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Turner et al.(2025)Turner, Hannaford, Barker, Suman, Killeen, Armitage, Chan, Davies, Griffin, Kumar et al.</label><mixed-citation>Turner, S., Hannaford, J., Barker, L. J., Suman, G., Killeen, A., Armitage, R., Chan, W., Davies, H., Griffin, A., Kumar, A., Dixon, H., Albuquerque, M. T. D., Almeida Ribeiro, N., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Amoussou, E., Arheimer, B., Asano, Y., Berezowski, T., Bodian, A., Boutaghane, H., Capell, R., Dakhlaoui, H., Daňhelka, J., Do, H. X., Ekkawatpanit, C., El Khalki, E. M., Fleig, A. K., Fonseca, R., Giraldo-Osorio, J. D., Goula, A. B. T., Hanel, M., Horton, S., Kan, C., Kingston, D. G., Laaha, G., Laugesen, R., Lopes, W., Mager, S., Rachdane, M., Markonis, Y., Medeiro, L., Midgley, G., Murphy, C., O’Connor, P., Pedersen, A. I., Pham, H. T., Piniewski, M., Renard, B., Saidi, M. E., Schmocker-Fackel, P., Stahl, K., Thyer, M., Toucher, M., Tramblay, Y., Uusikivi, J., Venegas-Cordero, N., Visessri, S., Watson, A., Westra, S., and Whitfield, P. H.: ROBIN: Reference observatory of basins for international hydrological climate change detection, Sci. Data, 12, 654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04907-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-025-04907-y</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Van Vliet et al.(2023)Van Vliet, Thorslund, Strokal, Hofstra, Flörke, Ehalt Macedo, Nkwasa, Tang, Kaushal, Kumar et al.</label><mixed-citation>Van Vliet, M. T. H., Thorslund, J., Strokal, M., Hofstra, N., Flörke, M., Ehalt Macedo, H., Nkwasa, A., Tang, T., Kaushal, S. S., Kumar, R., van Griensven, A., Bouwman, L., and Mosley, L. M.: Global river water quality under climate change and hydroclimatic extremes, Nat. Rev. Earth  Environ., 4, 687–702, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00472-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-023-00472-3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Vogel and Kroll(1989)</label><mixed-citation> Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: Low-flow frequency analysis using probability-plot correlation coefficients, J. Water Res. Pl., 115, 338–357, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Vogel and Kroll(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: A comparison of estimators of the conditional mean under non-stationary conditions, Adv. Water Res., 143, 103672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103672." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103672.</ext-link>, 2020. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Vogel and Kroll(2021)</label><mixed-citation> Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: On the need for streamflow drought frequency guidelines in the US, Water Policy, 23, 216–231, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Vogel and Sankarasubramanian(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Vogel, R. M. and Sankarasubramanian, A.: Spatial scaling properties of annual streamflow in the United States, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 45, 465–476, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Volpi et al.(2024)Volpi, Grimaldi, Aghakouchak, Castellarin, Chebana, Papalexiou, Aksoy, Bárdossy, Cancelliere, Chen et al.</label><mixed-citation>Volpi, E., Grimaldi, S., Aghakouchak, A., Castellarin, A., Chebana, F., Papalexiou, S. M., Aksoy, H., Bárdossy, A., Cancelliere, A., Chen, Y., Deidda, R., Haberlandt, U., Eris, E., Fischer, S., Francés, F., Kavetski, D., Kjeldsen, T. R., Kochanek, K., Langousis, A., Mediero Orduña, L., Montanari, A., Nerantzaki, S. D., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Prosdocimi, I., Ragno, E., Rajulapati, C. R., Requena, A. I., Ridolfi, E., Sadegh, M., Schumann, A., and Sharma, A.: The legacy of STAHY: milestones, achievements, challenges, and open problems in statistical hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. J., 69, 1913–1949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2385686" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2024.2385686</ext-link>,  2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Wang et al.(2022)Wang, Jiang, Ren, Xu, Shi, Yuan, Liu, and Fang</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Jiang, S., Ren, L., Xu, C.-Y., Shi, P., Yuan, S., Liu, Y., and Fang, X.: Nonstationary flood and low flow frequency analysis in the upper reaches of Huaihe River Basin, China, using climatic variables and reservoir index as covariates, J. Hydrol., 612, 128266,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128266" ext-link-type="DOI">0.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128266</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Yılmaz and Tosunoğlu(2024)</label><mixed-citation> Yılmaz, M. and Tosunoğlu, F.: Non-stationary low flow frequency analysis under climate change, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 155, 7479–7497, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Yu et al.(2015)Yu, Cohn, and Stedinger</label><mixed-citation>Yu, X., Cohn, T. A., and Stedinger, J. R.: Flood frequency analysis in the context of climate change, in: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2015, 2376–2385, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479162.233" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/9780784479162.233</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Zeder and Fischer(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Zeder, J. and Fischer, E. M.: Observed extreme precipitation trends and scaling in Central Europe, Weather and Climate Extremes, 29, 100266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wace.2020.100266</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis with mixed Weibull components and Copula-based dependence framework</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ahn and Palmer(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahn, K.-H. and Palmer, R. N.: Use of a nonstationary copula to predict future
bivariate low flow frequency in the Connecticut river basin, Hydrol.
Process., 30, 3518–3532, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bayazit(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bayazit, M.: Nonstationarity of hydrological records and recent trends in trend
analysis: a state-of-the-art review, Environmental Processes, 2, 527–542,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bhatti et al.(2019)Bhatti, Kroll, and Vogel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bhatti, S. J., Kroll, C. N., and Vogel, R. M.: Revisiting the probability
distribution of low streamflow series in the United States, J.
Hydrol. Eng., 24, 04019043, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001844</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Casado Rodríguez(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Casado Rodríguez, J.: CAMELS-ES: Catchment Attributes and Meteorologyfor
Large-Sample Studies – Spain, Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8428374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8428374</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chebana and Ouarda(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chebana, F. and Ouarda, T. B.: Multivariate non-stationary hydrological
frequency analysis, J. Hydrol., 593, 125907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125907</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Coles et al.(2001)Coles, Bawa, Trenner, and
Dorazio</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coles, S., Bawa, J., Trenner, L., and Dorazio, P.: An introduction to
statistical modeling of extreme values, vol. 208, Springer, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Delaigue et al.(2025)Delaigue, Guimarães, Brigode, Génot,
Perrin, Soubeyroux, Janet, Addor, and Andréassian</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delaigue, O., Guimarães, G. M., Brigode, P., Génot, B., Perrin, C., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Janet, B., Addor, N., and Andréassian, V.: CAMELS-FR dataset: a large-sample hydroclimatic dataset for France to explore hydrological diversity and support model benchmarking, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Delgado et al.(2010)Delgado, Apel, and Merz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delgado, J. M., Apel, H., and Merz, B.: Flood trends and variability in the Mekong river, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 407–418, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-407-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-407-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Du et al.(2015)Du, Xiong, Xu, Gippel, Guo, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Du, T., Xiong, L., Xu, C.-Y., Gippel, C. J., Guo, S., and Liu, P.: Return
period and risk analysis of nonstationary low-flow series under climate
change, J. Hydrol., 527, 234–250, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>eHYD(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
eHYD: eHYD – der Zugang zu hydrographischen Daten Österreichs, <a href="https://ehyd.gv.at/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21
November 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Fischer and Schumann(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fischer, S. and Schumann, A. H.: Temporal changes in the frequency of flood
types and their impact on flood statistics, J. Hydrol., 22,
100171,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100171</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Fitriana et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fitriana, F. S., Fischer, S., and Laaha, G.: Code to “Non-stationary low-flow frequency analysis with mixed Weibull components and Copula-based dependence framework”, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19406599</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Floriancic et al.(2021)Floriancic, Berghuijs, Molnar, and
Kirchner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Floriancic, M. G., Berghuijs, W. R., Molnar, P., and Kirchner, J. W.:
Seasonality and drivers of low flows across Europe and the United States,
Water Resour. Res., 57, e2019WR026928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026928" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026928</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Graham et al.(2024)Graham, Bierkens, and van
Vliet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Graham, D. J., Bierkens, M. F., and van Vliet, M. T.: Impacts of droughts and
heatwaves on river water quality worldwide, J. Hydrol., 629,
130590, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130590" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130590</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>GRDC(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
GRDC: Global Runoff Data Centre, <a href="https://grdc.bafg.de/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 November 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Haslinger and Mayer(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haslinger, K. and Mayer, K.: Early spring droughts in Central Europe:
Indications for atmospheric and oceanic drivers, Atmos. Sci. Lett.,
24, e1136, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1136</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Hodgkins et al.(2024)Hodgkins, Renard, Whitfield, Laaha, Stahl,
Hannaford, Burn, Westra, Fleig, Araújo Lopes
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hodgkins, G. A., Renard, B., Whitfield, P. H., Laaha, G., Stahl, K., Hannaford, J., Burn, D. H., Westra, S., Fleig,
A. K., Araújo Lopes, W. T., Murphy, C., Mediero, L., and Hanel, M.:  Climate driven trends in historical
extreme low streamflows on four continents, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2022WR034326,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034326</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Höge et al.(2023)Höge, Kauzlaric, Siber, Schönenberger,
Horton, Schwanbeck, Floriancic, Viviroli, Wilhelm, Sikorska-Senoner
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Höge, M., Kauzlaric, M., Siber, R., Schönenberger, U., Horton, P., Schwanbeck, J., Floriancic, M. G., Viviroli, D., Wilhelm, S., Sikorska-Senoner, A. E., Addor, N., Brunner, M., Pool, S., Zappa, M., and Fenicia, F.: CAMELS-CH: hydro-meteorological time series and landscape attributes for 331 catchments in hydrologic Switzerland, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5755–5784, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Ionita and Nagavciuc(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ionita, M. and Nagavciuc, V.: Forecasting low flow conditions months in advance
through teleconnection patterns, with a special focus on summer 2018,
Sci. Rep., 10, 13258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70060-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70060-8</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Kaufman and Rousseeuw(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. J.: Finding groups in data: an introduction to
cluster analysis, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN 978-0-470-31748-8, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Kendall(1976)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Methods, 4th edn., Griffin, London, ISBN 978-0-85264-199-6, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Klein et al.(2010)Klein, Schumann, and Pahlow</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klein, B., Schumann, A. H., and Pahlow, M.: Copulas–new risk assessment
methodology for dam safety, in: Flood risk assessment and management: How to
specify hydrological loads, their consequences and uncertainties, 149–185, Springer, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9917-4_8</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Laaha(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G.: Modelling summer and winter droughts as a basis for estimating river
low flows, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication, 289–296, ISBN 978-1-901502-81-7, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Laaha(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G.: Process based regionalisation of low flows, PhD thesis, Technische
Universität Wien, <a href="https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-13474" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 May 2025), 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Laaha(2023a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G.: A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 1: Concept, performance, and effect of seasonality, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 689–701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-689-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-689-2023</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Laaha(2023b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G.: A mixed distribution approach for low-flow frequency analysis – Part 2: Comparative assessment of a mixed probability vs. copula-based dependence framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2019–2034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2019-2023</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Laaha and Blöschl(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G. and Blöschl, G.: A comparison of low flow regionalisation
methods–catchment grouping, J. Hydrol., 323, 193–214, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Laaha and Blöschl(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G. and Blöschl, G.: A national low flow estimation procedure for
Austria, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52, 625–644, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Laaha et al.(2017)Laaha, Gauster, Tallaksen, Vidal, Stahl, Prudhomme,
Heudorfer, Vlnas, Ionita, Van Lanen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laaha, G., Gauster, T., Tallaksen, L. M., Vidal, J.-P., Stahl, K., Prudhomme, C., Heudorfer, B., Vlnas, R., Ionita, M., Van Lanen, H. A. J., Adler, M.-J., Caillouet, L., Delus, C., Fendekova, M., Gailliez, S., Hannaford, J., Kingston, D., Van Loon, A. F., Mediero, L., Osuch, M., Romanowicz, R., Sauquet, E., Stagge, J. H., and Wong, W. K.: The European 2015 drought from a hydrological perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3001–3024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3001-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3001-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lee et al.(2023)Lee, Calvin, Dasgupta, Krinmer, Mukherji, Thorne,
Trisos, Romero, Aldunce, Barret et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, H., Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P., Trisos, C., Romero, J., Aldunce, P.,
Barrett, K., Blanco, G., Cheung, W. W. L., Connors, S. L., Denton, F., Diongue-Niang, A., Dodman, D.,
Garschagen, M., Geden, O., Hayward, B., Jones, C., Jotzo, F., Krug, T., Lasco, R., Lee, J.-Y., Masson-Delmotte,
V., Meinshausen, M., Mintenbeck, K., Mokssit, A., Otto, F. E. L., Pathak, M., Pirani, A., Poloczanska, E.,
Pörtner, H.-O., Revi, A., Roberts, D. C., Roy, J., Ruane, A. C., Skea, J., Shukla, P. R., Slade, R., Slangen, A.,
Sokona, Y., Sörensson, A. A., Tignor, M., van Vuuren, D., Wei, Y.-M., Winkler, H., Zhai, P., and Zommers, Z.:
Synthesis report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Longer report, IPCC,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Loritz et al.(2024)Loritz, Dolich, Acuña Espinoza, Ebeling, Guse,
Götte, Hassler, Hauffe, Heidbüchel, Kiesel
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Loritz, R., Dolich, A., Acuña Espinoza, E., Ebeling, P., Guse, B., Götte, J., Hassler, S. K., Hauffe, C., Heidbüchel, I., Kiesel, J., Mälicke, M., Müller-Thomy, H., Stölzle, M., and Tarasova, L.: CAMELS-DE: hydro-meteorological time series and attributes for 1582 catchments in Germany, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5625–5642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5625-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Milly et al.(2008)Milly, Betancourt, Falkenmark, Hirsch, Kundzewicz,
Lettenmaier, and Stouffer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W.,
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Stouffer, R. J.: Stationarity is dead: Whither water
management?, Science, 319, 573–574, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Montanari et al.(2013)Montanari, Young, Savenije, Hughes, Wagener,
Ren, Koutsoyiannis, Cudennec, Toth, Grimaldi et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montanari, A., Young, G., Savenije, H. H. G., Hughes, D., Wagener, T., Ren, L. L., Koutsoyiannis, D., Cudennec,
C., Toth, E., Grimaldi, S., Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., Gupta, H., Hipsey, M., Schaefli, B., Arheimer,
B., Boegh, E., Schymanski, S. J., Di Baldassarre, G., Yu, B., Hubert, P., Huang, Y., Schumann, A., Post, D. A.,
Srinivasan, V., Harman, C., Thompson, S., Rogger, M., Viglione, A., McMillan, H., Characklis, G., Pang, Z.,
and Belyaev, V.: “Panta Rhei – Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society – The IAHS Scientific
Decade 2013–2022, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1256–1275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.809088</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mosley(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mosley, L. M.: Drought impacts on the water quality of freshwater systems;
review and integration, Earth-Sci. Rev., 140, 203–214, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Önöz and Bayazit(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Önöz, B. and Bayazit, M.: Block bootstrap for Mann–Kendall trend test
of serially dependent data, Hydrol. Process., 26, 3552–3560, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Patakamuri et al.(2020)Patakamuri, O'Brien, and
Patakamuri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Patakamuri, S. K., O'Brien, N., and Patakamuri, M. S. K.: Package
“modifiedmk”, Cran, R-project, <a href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.modifiedmk" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.modifiedmk</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Salas et al.(2018)Salas, Obeysekera, and Vogel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salas, J., Obeysekera, J., and Vogel, R.: Techniques for assessing water
infrastructure for nonstationary extreme events: A review, Hydrolog.
Sci. J., 63, 325–352, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Sen(1968)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Serago and Vogel(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Serago, J. M. and Vogel, R. M.: Parsimonious nonstationary flood frequency
analysis, Adv. Water Resour., 112, 1–16, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Sklar(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sklar, M.: Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges, in:
Annales de l'ISUP, 8, 229–231, 1959.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Stahl et al.(2010)Stahl, Hisdal, Hannaford, Tallaksen, Van Lanen,
Sauquet, Demuth, Fendekova, and Jódar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J., Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., and Jódar, J.: Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Stedinger(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stedinger, J. R.: Frequency analysis of extreme events, Handbook of hydrology,
ISBN 978-0-07-039732-3, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Tallaksen and Laaha(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tallaksen, L. M. and Laaha, G.: Frequency analysis, in: Hydrological Drought: Processes and Estimation
Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater, 2nd edn., edited by: Tallaksen, L. M. and van Lanen, H. A. J.,
Chapter 6, 233–304, Elsevier, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819082-1.00003-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819082-1.00003-5</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Tallaksen and Van Lanen(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tallaksen, L. M. and van Lanen, H. A. J. (Eds.): Hydrological Drought: Processes and Estimation Methods for
Streamflow and Groundwater, 2nd edn., Elsevier, 684 pp., ISBN 978-0-12-819082-1,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03464-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03464-X</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Tramblay et al.(2021)Tramblay, Rutkowska, Sauquet, Sefton, Laaha,
Osuch, Albuquerque, Alves, Banasik, Beaufort et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tramblay, Y., Rutkowska, A., Sauquet, E., Sefton, C., Laaha, G., Osuch, M., Albuquerque, T., Alves, M. H.,
Banasik, K., Beaufort, A., Brocca, L., Camici, S., Csabai, Z., Dakhlaoui, H., DeGirolamo, A. M., Dörflinger, G.,
Gallart, F., Gauster, T., Hanich, L., Kohnová, S., Mediero, L., Ninov, P., Parry, S., Quintana-Seguí, P., Tzoraki,
O., and Datry, T.: Trends in flow intermittence for European rivers, Hydrol. Sci. J., 66, 37–49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1849708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1849708</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Turner et al.(2025)Turner, Hannaford, Barker, Suman, Killeen,
Armitage, Chan, Davies, Griffin, Kumar et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turner, S., Hannaford, J., Barker, L. J., Suman, G., Killeen, A., Armitage, R., Chan, W., Davies, H., Griffin, A.,
Kumar, A., Dixon, H., Albuquerque, M. T. D., Almeida Ribeiro, N., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Amoussou, E.,
Arheimer, B., Asano, Y., Berezowski, T., Bodian, A., Boutaghane, H., Capell, R., Dakhlaoui, H., Daňhelka, J.,
Do, H. X., Ekkawatpanit, C., El Khalki, E. M., Fleig, A. K., Fonseca, R., Giraldo-Osorio, J. D., Goula, A. B. T.,
Hanel, M., Horton, S., Kan, C., Kingston, D. G., Laaha, G., Laugesen, R., Lopes, W., Mager, S., Rachdane, M.,
Markonis, Y., Medeiro, L., Midgley, G., Murphy, C., O’Connor, P., Pedersen, A. I., Pham, H. T., Piniewski, M.,
Renard, B., Saidi, M. E., Schmocker-Fackel, P., Stahl, K., Thyer, M., Toucher, M., Tramblay, Y., Uusikivi, J.,
Venegas-Cordero, N., Visessri, S., Watson, A., Westra, S., and Whitfield, P. H.: ROBIN: Reference observatory
of basins for international hydrological climate change detection, Sci. Data, 12, 654,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04907-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04907-y</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Van Vliet et al.(2023)Van Vliet, Thorslund, Strokal, Hofstra,
Flörke, Ehalt Macedo, Nkwasa, Tang, Kaushal, Kumar
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Vliet, M. T. H., Thorslund, J., Strokal, M., Hofstra, N., Flörke, M., Ehalt Macedo, H., Nkwasa, A., Tang, T.,
Kaushal, S. S., Kumar, R., van Griensven, A., Bouwman, L., and Mosley, L. M.: Global river water quality under
climate change and hydroclimatic extremes, Nat. Rev. Earth  Environ., 4, 687–702,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00472-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00472-3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Vogel and Kroll(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: Low-flow frequency analysis using
probability-plot correlation coefficients, J. Water Res.
Pl., 115, 338–357, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Vogel and Kroll(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: A comparison of estimators of the conditional
mean under non-stationary conditions, Adv. Water Res., 143,
103672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103672." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103672.</a>, 2020.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Vogel and Kroll(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, R. M. and Kroll, C. N.: On the need for streamflow drought frequency
guidelines in the US, Water Policy, 23, 216–231, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Vogel and Sankarasubramanian(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vogel, R. M. and Sankarasubramanian, A.: Spatial scaling properties of annual
streamflow in the United States, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 45, 465–476,
2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Volpi et al.(2024)Volpi, Grimaldi, Aghakouchak, Castellarin, Chebana,
Papalexiou, Aksoy, Bárdossy, Cancelliere, Chen et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volpi, E., Grimaldi, S., Aghakouchak, A., Castellarin, A., Chebana, F., Papalexiou, S. M., Aksoy, H., Bárdossy,
A., Cancelliere, A., Chen, Y., Deidda, R., Haberlandt, U., Eris, E., Fischer, S., Francés, F., Kavetski, D.,
Kjeldsen, T. R., Kochanek, K., Langousis, A., Mediero Orduña, L., Montanari, A., Nerantzaki, S. D., Ouarda, T.
B. M. J., Prosdocimi, I., Ragno, E., Rajulapati, C. R., Requena, A. I., Ridolfi, E., Sadegh, M., Schumann, A., and
Sharma, A.: The legacy of STAHY: milestones, achievements, challenges, and open problems in statistical
hydrology, Hydrol. Sci. J., 69, 1913–1949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2385686" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2385686</a>,  2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Wang et al.(2022)Wang, Jiang, Ren, Xu, Shi, Yuan, Liu, and
Fang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, M., Jiang, S., Ren, L., Xu, C.-Y., Shi, P., Yuan, S., Liu, Y., and Fang,
X.: Nonstationary flood and low flow frequency analysis in the upper reaches
of Huaihe River Basin, China, using climatic variables and reservoir index as
covariates, J. Hydrol., 612, 128266,  <a href="https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128266</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Yılmaz and Tosunoğlu(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yılmaz, M. and Tosunoğlu, F.: Non-stationary low flow frequency
analysis under climate change, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 155,
7479–7497, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Yu et al.(2015)Yu, Cohn, and Stedinger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, X., Cohn, T. A., and Stedinger, J. R.: Flood frequency analysis in the
context of climate change, in: World Environmental and Water Resources
Congress 2015, 2376–2385, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479162.233" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479162.233</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Zeder and Fischer(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeder, J. and Fischer, E. M.: Observed extreme precipitation trends and scaling
in Central Europe, Weather and Climate Extremes, 29, 100266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100266</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
