<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-30-6531-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Characterizing Climate-Driven Shifts in Chilean Rainfall Regimes with a Hybrid Hidden Markov–Copula Framework</article-title><alt-title>Climate-Induced Shifts in Chilean Rainfall Regimes</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Herrera-Marín</surname><given-names>Mauricio</given-names></name>
          <email>mherrera@udd.cl</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-3077</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kleisinger</surname><given-names>Francisca</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rivera</surname><given-names>Diego</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>Andrés</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Godoy-Faundez</surname><given-names>Alex</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9609-9863</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Research Center on Sustainability and Strategic Resource Management (CISGER), Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Desarrollo (UDD), Avda. Plaza 680, Santiago, Chile</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Mauricio Herrera-Marín (mherrera@udd.cl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>30</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>6531</fpage><lpage>6547</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Mauricio Herrera-Marín et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e116">Chile's hydroclimate exhibits pronounced meridional gradients and strong interannual variability, posing persistent challenges for regime-aware, probabilistic rainfall prediction. We introduce a hierarchical framework that explicitly separates large-scale regime dynamics from local spatial dependence. The approach integrates: (i) a covariate-driven non-homogeneous Hidden Markov Model (nHMM) to identify synoptic precipitation regimes and their climate-sensitive transitions; (ii) Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) clustering to delineate precipitation-coherent climatic zones; and (iii) state-conditional Regular Vine copulas with Generalized Pareto (GPD) tails to model residual spatial dependence and extremes. The analysis employs the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daily CR2MET precipitation product over continental Chile (462 grid points, May–August (MJJA) 1980–2021) together with large-scale atmospheric covariates including zonal and meridional wind components, geopotential height, sea-level pressure, sea surface temperature, vertically integrated moisture flux and its divergence, and standard El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) indices: the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), and the Global Mean Sea Surface Temperature (GMSST).</p>

      <p id="d2e129">Five physically consistent rainfall regimes emerge, spanning from an anticyclonic dry state to a cyclonic wet state, confirmed by composites of mean sea-level pressure, 850 hPa winds, and 500 hPa geopotential height. The nHMM comprises <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">284</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated parameters fit to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">386</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">692</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daily observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), confirming adequate model identifiability. Mixed-effects inference on annual transition proportions reveals a statistically significant decline in wet-state self-persistence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<sup>−1</sup> (95 % CI: [0.21, 0.47] % yr<sup>−1</sup>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % over 1980–2022), coincident with rising GMSST. Out-of-sample ensembles for MJJA 2022 (100 daily members conditioned on Viterbi-decoded states) are well calibrated across all seven DTW zones: central 90 % prediction intervals achieve near-nominal coverage (88 %–98 %), asymmetry degrees <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and widths that increase monotonically southward with climatological variance. GPD shape parameters range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in anticyclonic dry states (bounded tails) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in episodic frontal states (heavy tails), confirming state-specific extreme behaviour. The vine-copula layer yields statistically significant improvements over a conditionally independent baseline (Diebold–Mariano test with heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent standard errors, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the rainfall-active southern zones, where skill scores of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score reach 0.51 (Zone 5) and 0.35 (Zone 6) relative to a climatological benchmark, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeds 0.87 for the 25 mm exceedance threshold. By disentangling regime timing and drivers from residual spatial co-variability and extremes, the proposed nHMM–DTW–vine–GPD framework yields meteorologically coherent states, spatially consistent probabilistic simulations, and quantitatively validated forecasts, offering a principled pathway for regime-conditioned, uncertainty-aware precipitation prediction to support hydroclimate risk management in Chile and other topographically complex regions.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo</funding-source>
<award-id>ANID/ANILLO/ATE250004</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e296">Understanding precipitation variability and its long-term modulation is a central challenge in hydroclimatology, particularly in regions of pronounced climatic heterogeneity such as Chile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.1"/>. The country spans an extreme meridional gradient – from hyperarid deserts in the north (18–26° S) to temperate and subpolar climates in the south (44–54° S) – producing sharp transitions in precipitation regimes and associated hydrological processes. Rainfall variability operates across multiple temporal scales, including seasonal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.2"/>, interannual <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.3"/>, and decadal to multidecadal fluctuations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.4"/>. Among the large-scale climate drivers, El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) dominates interannual variability, modulating storm-track position, jet strength, and moisture transport toward subtropical South America <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.5"/>. These effects are typically represented through the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), and the Global Mean Sea Surface Temperature (GMSST), which encapsulate large-scale forcing but often fail to explain the strong spatial gradients in rainfall induced by orography, mesoscale dynamics, and land–atmosphere coupling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.6"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e318">The persistence of extreme drought conditions – particularly the decade-long “megadrought” affecting central Chile since 2010 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.7"/> – underscores the urgency of developing analytical frameworks that integrate both large-scale climate drivers and localized hydrological responses. Annual precipitation deficits between 15 % and 45 % relative to the pre-2010 baseline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.8"/>, combined with regional warming and snowpack decline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.9"/>, have exacerbated water scarcity and altered runoff regimes. These changes highlight the limitations of traditional statistical models that assume linearity or stationarity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx67" id="paren.10"/>. Capturing hidden or emergent shifts in rainfall regimes therefore requires probabilistic frameworks capable of representing temporal evolution, regime persistence, and non-linear teleconnections.</p>
      <p id="d2e333">In this context, we employ a Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Model (nHMM) to identify latent rainfall regimes and characterize their temporal dynamics. HMMs have been extensively used for atmospheric circulation regimes and daily rainfall sequences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.11"/>; the non-homogeneous extension allows transition probabilities to depend on time-varying covariates such as ENSO indices or large-scale circulation fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.12"/>, enabling detection of evolving regime behavior under changing climatic conditions. Beyond identifying discrete rainfall states, we assess long-term persistence and transition probabilities using linear mixed models, quantifying statistically significant trends that reflect climate-induced shifts in regime stability.</p>
      <p id="d2e342">A key limitation of conventional nHMM applications lies in their assumption of conditional spatial independence – that rainfall at different locations is independent once the hidden state is known. This simplification is rarely valid in complex terrain such as Chile, where strong orographic forcing and mesoscale circulations generate residual spatial dependence even after conditioning on large-scale atmospheric states. To address this, we develop a hybrid nHMM–Copula framework that combines the temporal structure and climatic interpretability of nHMMs with explicit spatial modelling via multivariate copulas. Chile is first partitioned into homogeneous precipitation zones using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) clustering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.13"/>. Within each zone, state-specific copula models reconstruct spatial dependence, thereby relaxing the restrictive independence assumption while preserving the probabilistic and physically interpretable structure of the HMM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.14"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e352">Previous studies have independently applied HMMs and copula models to precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.15"/>, yet few have integrated spatial dependence within a covariate-driven nHMM framework. The novelty of this study lies in bridging these two perspectives through a hybrid regime-based, dependence-aware modelling system that explicitly links hidden rainfall regimes to large-scale atmospheric drivers while reconstructing state-conditioned spatial dependencies, providing an interpretable, transferable, and uncertainty-aware basis for rainfall regime analysis and probabilistic forecasting across Chile's diverse hydroclimatic zones.</p>
      <p id="d2e358">The paper is organized as follows. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the data, the step-by-step model construction, and the validation approach. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents the resulting rainfall regimes, their atmospheric interpretation, temporal trends, and spatially coherent probabilistic simulations. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> discusses methodological advances, hydroclimatic implications, limitations, and potential extensions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e375">This section guides the reader sequentially through the modelling pipeline. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/> describes the precipitation product and atmospheric covariates. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> introduces the nHMM. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> builds the hybrid spatial framework step by step: DTW zoning (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1"/>), marginal specification (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2"/>), copula construction (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3"/>–<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4"/>), simulation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5"/>), and uncertainty metrics (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6"/>). Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4"/> details the validation strategy. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/> summarizes model selection.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data</title>
      <p id="d2e409">Daily precipitation across Chile is monitored by official agencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.16"/>, yet many ground stations exhibit discontinuities, missing data, or records shorter than 30 years, limiting their suitability for robust climate diagnostics. To ensure spatial completeness and temporal consistency, we employed the CR2MET dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.17"/>, a high-resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) gridded product developed specifically for continental Chile and validated against dense observational networks. CR2MET integrates station observations with ERA5 reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.18"/> via statistical downscaling, capturing precipitation over complex orography more realistically than global products <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e434">From CR2MET we extracted 462 grid points collocated with operational rain gauges with uninterrupted daily records during 1980–2021. Each grid point contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5166</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daily austral-winter (May–August; MJJA) observations; frontal systems during MJJA account for approximately 70 %–90 % of annual rainfall between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° S <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.20"/>, dominating streamflow generation, groundwater recharge, and Andean snow accumulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.21"/>. The year 2022 is reserved for out-of-sample evaluation. Seasonal totals are primarily modulated by the South Pacific Subtropical High and the Southern Hemisphere storm track <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.22"/>; orographic enhancement along the Andes intensifies rainfall from frontal systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.23"/>, while persistent blocking can produce substantial deficits even during ENSO-neutral conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e483">Large-scale atmospheric covariates for the nHMM transition model were extracted from ERA5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.25"/> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over continental Chile and adjacent oceanic domains (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> N–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>° S, 120–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W). The covariate set comprises geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500); mean sea-level pressure (MSLP); sea surface temperature (SST); near-surface and maximum temperature; zonal and meridional wind components at 850 hPa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); vertically integrated moisture flux and its divergence (VIMF, VIMFD); and the ENSO indices SOI, ONI, and GMSST. The inclusion of VIMF and VIMFD is motivated by their direct link to landfalling moisture flux over Chile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.26"/>: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">850</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone do not fully characterize atmospheric moisture delivery in the presence of orographic blocking and low-level jets. Principal Component Analysis was applied independently to each gridded field; leading components explaining more than 80 % of total variance were retained as predictors in the nHMM transition model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Model</title>
      <p id="d2e591">The nHMM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.27"/> identifies latent climate regimes and models their temporal evolution in daily rainfall sequences. Transitions between states follow the Markov property, and the nHMM extends the conventional HMM by allowing transition probabilities to vary in time through dependence on external covariates.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Model structure</title>
      <p id="d2e604">Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote daily precipitation at location <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">long</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lat</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5166</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (42 winters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 123 MJJA days, 1980–2021) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">462</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial locations; 2022 is reserved for out-of-sample evaluation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimensional precipitation vector on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the latent Markov chain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined by four assumptions.</p>
      <p id="d2e831"><italic>Assumption 1</italic> (Markovian dynamics): the hidden state sequence is first-order Markov, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e913"><italic>Assumption 2</italic> (Conditional rainfall dependence): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1032"><italic>Assumption 3</italic> (Conditional spatial independence): conditional on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, precipitation across stations is assumed independent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This assumption is relaxed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/> via vine copulas. Each marginal term follows a zero-inflated Gamma mixture,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="5.690551pt" columnspacing="1em" class="cases" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry-day probability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shape and rate parameters of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th Gamma component.</p>
      <p id="d2e1404"><italic>Assumption 4</italic> (Non-homogeneity): transition probabilities depend on the atmospheric covariate vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via multinomial logistic regression,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the baseline log-odds of transition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantifies covariate influence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Estimation</title>
      <p id="d2e1616">Parameters are estimated via the Baum–Welch (EM) algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.28"/>, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.29"/> as adapted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.30"/>. Model selection over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uses AIC and BIC (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Hybrid nHMM–Copula Framework with DTW-Based Zoning</title>
      <p id="d2e1689">The nHMM provides a coherent temporal-regime layer, but Assumption 3 is often too restrictive in regions with strong orographic gradients and mesoscale circulations such as Chile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.31"/>. The hybrid framework addresses this through four sequential steps whose conceptual justification is elaborated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS4"/>. Full mathematical details and extended diagnostics are in Supplement S1–S4.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Step 1 – Zoning via DTW</title>
      <p id="d2e1704">A direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">462</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-variate copula is computationally prohibitive. We partition the station network into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> zones via hierarchical clustering on pairwise Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) dissimilarities computed from standardized MJJA daily series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.32"/>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DTW</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the set of monotone warping paths. Ward's linkage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.33"/> on the resulting distance matrix yields compact, interpretable clusters.</p>
      <p id="d2e1836">The optimal number of zones is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, selected via a consensus of five internal cluster validity indices (CVI): Silhouette, Calinski–Harabasz, Davies–Bouldin, Dunn, and COP (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>; full table in Supplement S2). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution achieves the best consensus rank across all five CVIs, aligns with established climatic subregions of continental Chile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.34"/>, and yields zones with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stations and at least 200 training days per state, providing sufficient data for robust copula estimation.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1897">Top-ranked DTW zoning candidates (consensus CVI rank). Sil: Silhouette; CH: Calinski–Harabasz (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); DB: Davies–Bouldin; COP: COP index. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>: larger is better; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>: smaller is better. Bold: selected configuration.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Config.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sil<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">DB<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Dunn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mo>↑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">COP<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>↓</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Rank</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>ward.D2</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>0.390</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>186.4</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><bold>0.743</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>0.012</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>0.241</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>1</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ward.D2, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.393</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">201.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.810</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.271</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ward.D, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.401</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">212.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.787</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.259</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ward.D2, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.390</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">235.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.816</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ward.D, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.376</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">224.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.843</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.306</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Step 2 – State-conditional marginal specification</title>
      <p id="d2e2207">For station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the state-conditioned CDF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated from the Viterbi-decoded training subset using a three-part hybrid marginal: (1) a point mass at zero with probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (2) a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-component Gamma mixture for positive amounts; and (3) a Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD) for the upper tail above threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.90 empirical quantile of positive precipitation):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex4"><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Continuity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is enforced by probability-splicing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2513">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> summarizes GPD estimates for the Zone 5 medoid (southern Chile, storm-dominated) across all five states. GPD shape parameters exhibit a physically consistent pattern: states 0, 3, and 4 (anticyclonic to transitional) show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (bounded or near-exponential tails), while states 1 and 2 (episodic frontal intrusions) yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (heavy, unbounded tails). This contrast reflects the distinct precipitation generation mechanisms: light, intermittent precipitation associated with cold-air incursions under blocking conditions (bounded tails) versus intense, organized rainfall from deep frontal systems (heavy tails). Bootstrap 95 % confidence intervals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parametric resamples of the medoid's own exceedances) confirm that this sign contrast is statistically robust across the range. Threshold sensitivity at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was verified via mean-excess diagnostics (Supplement S3), confirming adequate GPD stability at the adopted 0.90 level.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2591">GPD parameter estimates at the Zone 5 medoid by nHMM state (southern Chile, storm-dominated). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 0.90-quantile threshold (mm); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>: scale; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>: shape; 95 % bootstrap CI from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parametric resamples of medoid exceedances; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: number of exceedances above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">State</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CI<sub><italic>L</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">CI<sub><italic>U</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Tail</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bounded</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.458</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">heavy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.121</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">heavy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">43.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.161</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bounded</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.112</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">bounded</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>2.3.3</label><title>Step 3 – Transformation to copula space</title>
      <p id="d2e3034">State-conditional probability integral transform (PIT) pseudo-observations for zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By Sklar's theorem <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.36"/>, the conditional joint law factorizes as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex5"><mml:math id="M117" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo mathsize="1.5em">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            so marginal behaviour is inherited from Step 2 and residual spatial dependence is encoded entirely by the copula <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>2.3.4</label><title>Step 4 – Regular vine construction and model selection</title>
      <p id="d2e3237">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> we represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a Regular Vine (R-vine) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.37"/>, decomposing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-variate density into bivariate pair-copulas:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex6"><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            We adopt the simplifying assumption (pair-copula parameters independent of conditioning variable values); diagnostics in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2"/> confirm its empirical adequacy. The candidate family set is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gaussian</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Student</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Clayton</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Gumbel</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Frank</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, covering elliptical and Archimedean families with different tail properties. Structure selection and family assignment use AIC edge-wise via <monospace>RVineStructureSelect</monospace> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.38"/>; parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood with multiple random initialisations. Vines are truncated at Tree 2, which captures the dominant spatial links (typically between nearby stations) while limiting over-fitting in higher-order trees where conditional dependence attenuates.</p>
      <p id="d2e3456">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/> shows the selected structures for Zone 2 (semi-arid north) across all states. All are R-vines truncated at Tree 2, with Archimedean families predominating (7 %–23 % of edges) and Gaussian pairs rare (0 %–3 %), reflecting the non-Gaussian, asymmetric spatial dependence structure of daily precipitation in semi-arid terrain. As expected, the proportion of Gaussian pairs increases southward (reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in wet states of Zone 5; Supplement S4), consistent with more elliptically distributed spatial fields under persistent frontal forcing.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3478">Selected vine structures for Zone 2, all five states. %Arch: percentage of Archimedean pair-copula families selected by AIC; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: training days.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">State</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Trunc.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">%Gauss</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">%Arch</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R-vine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1179</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R-vine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1269</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R-vine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">23.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">845</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R-vine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1013</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">R-vine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">16.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">860</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS5">
  <label>2.3.5</label><title>State-aware simulation and back-transformation</title>
      <p id="d2e3657">Given Viterbi-decoded regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: (1) draw <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via <monospace>RVineSim</monospace>; (2) map back to precipitation using the stitched marginal inverse, directing draws above the tail threshold through the GPD quantile function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.39"/>. The full system comprises <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> copula models, parallelized across <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using <monospace>VineCopula</monospace> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.40"/> and <monospace>TSclust</monospace> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS6">
  <label>2.3.6</label><title>Uncertainty quantification metrics</title>
      <p id="d2e3780">From <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ensemble members per day, define the central 90 % prediction interval <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (5th–95th percentiles). Let <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> be the observation. We report the Average Width (AW), the Percentage of Coverage (POC), and the Average Asymmetry Degree (AAD):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="gather"><mml:math id="M137" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AW</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAD</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAD</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAD</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures the normalized distance of the observation from the nearest interval bound when outside (and is zero when inside). These indicators are not substitutes for proper scoring rules but enhance communication of sharpness, calibration, and directional bias across zones.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Model validation strategy</title>
      <p id="d2e3985">We assess model adequacy at two complementary levels: the temporal regime structure encoded by the nHMM, and the residual state-conditioned spatial dependence within DTW zones. Probabilistic skill is verified out-of-sample. Each diagnostic component is described below together with its decision criterion, clarifying how each test leads to a specific modelling choice rather than serving merely as a catalogue of tests applied.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>nHMM fit and calibration</title>
      <p id="d2e3996">The nHMM yields the one-step predictive distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Pr⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="script">L</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. PIT residuals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should be i.i.d. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Unif</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under correct specification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.42"/>. We examine PIT histograms and apply Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) and Cramér–von Mises (CvM) uniformity tests, together with Ljung–Box tests for residual autocorrelation (Supplement S1).  Retention criterion: a configuration is retained if PIT histograms are visually flat, KS/CvM tests do not reject uniformity at the 5 % level for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of stations, and no significant Ljung–Box autocorrelation is detected. Regime count <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is selected by BIC (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5"/>), with PIT-based adequacy as a secondary check. Wet/dry occurrence is validated via Brier scores and reliability diagrams; tail diagnostics include mean-excess plots and GPD shape bootstrap CIs (Supplement S3). State-aware PITs using smoothed probabilities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>Pr⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>∣</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isolate emission misspecification from transition errors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Vine-copula fit: residual spatial dependence</title>
      <p id="d2e4310">Within zone <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the Rosenblatt transform <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maps <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that should be i.i.d. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Unif</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under correct specification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.44"/>. Diagnostics include marginal KS/CvM tests on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">V</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; energy-distance tests against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Unif</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.45"/>; and parametric-bootstrap GoF for edge copulas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.46"/>. Upper tail-coincidence rates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and variogram functionals <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are reported in Supplement S4. We note that KS and CvM tests on individual Rosenblatt components are extremely sensitive at the training sample sizes employed here (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">845</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1269</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> d per state): they will reliably detect even minor residual dependence that has negligible practical consequence for forecast calibration. Accordingly, the  operative criterion for vine adequacy is not strict <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value thresholds on every component but rather: (i) PIT histograms visually consistent with uniformity for states and zones used in the verification; (ii) variogram scores lower for the vine model than for the independence baseline; and (iii) Diebold–Mariano tests confirming predictive skill gains in out-of-sample verification. Competing vine structures (C-, D-, R-vines), truncation levels, and family sets are compared by AIC/BIC; Vuong's test resolves close comparisons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>2.4.3</label><title>Out-of-sample probabilistic verification</title>
      <p id="d2e4515">We use strictly proper scoring rules <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.48"/>. The Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS) for a predictive CDF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and realization <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex10"><mml:math id="M161" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRPS</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            estimated from ensemble <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via the unbiased estimator of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.49"/>. CRPS skill scores (CRPSS) use the MJJA climatological distribution (1980–2021) as the reference. At the multivariate level, energy scores (ES) and variogram scores (VS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.50"/> are computed; VS is particularly diagnostic of dependence misspecification. Differences versus the conditionally independent baseline are tested with Diebold–Mariano statistics using Newey–West heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent (HAC) standard errors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.51"/>. Decision criterion: the vine layer is deemed to improve over the independence baseline if the Diebold–Mariano test rejects equality at the 10 % level (HAC-adjusted) for station-wise CRPS or zone-wise VS in the majority of zones.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS4">
  <label>2.4.4</label><title>Conceptual justification of the hierarchical design</title>
      <p id="d2e4651">The apparent tension between assuming conditional spatial independence in the nHMM (Assumption 3) and subsequently introducing spatial dependence via copulas is resolved by scale separation. Regime transitions are driven by synoptic–planetary variability (ENSO, storm track, South Pacific High), whereas subdaily–mesoscale organization shapes spatial correlation given a regime. Estimating regimes without a high-dimensional spatial likelihood avoids confounding temporal state dynamics with local dependence and stabilizes identification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, transition coefficients, and emission parameters. The modular likelihood is computationally tractable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the nHMM stage) and attains near-full-model performance without embedding a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-variate copula inside EM. Any potential mismatch introduced by the modular approach is explicitly probed by the three-layer diagnostic strategy above. Empirically, the copula-adjusted simulations reproduce observed spatial coherence and extreme-rainfall behaviour in the rainfall-active zones (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>), providing the key evidence that this principled approximation is adequate for the intended purpose.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Model selection: grid of nHMM configurations</title>
      <p id="d2e4702">We fitted a grid of 30 nHMMs varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the number of Gamma mixture components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Supplement S9), denoting each as <monospace><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>hs<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>dg</monospace>. Model selection uses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BIC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5166</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">462</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">386</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">692</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/> reports key statistics for the three candidate models.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4838">Model selection: representative configurations per <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (by BIC). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: maximized log-likelihood; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: free parameters; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: observations-per-parameter ratio. Bold: adopted configuration. The BIC minimum within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <monospace>5hs3dg</monospace> (BIC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">437</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">601</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <monospace>5hs5dg</monospace> is preferred on secondary criteria (PIT flatness, regime separation, GPD tail adequacy) at a BIC cost of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Full 30-configuration grid in Supplement S9.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Config.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AIC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">BIC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4hs4dg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 595</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">286</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">428</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 608 046</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10 733 017</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">136</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>5hs5dg</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>5</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><bold>29 284</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><bold>5 108 541</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><bold>10 275 650</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><bold>10 483 644</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><bold>82</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6hs3dg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17 695</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">006</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">775</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 048 940</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10 174 621</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">135</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5121">The BIC surface shows a clear elbow at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: moving from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields a large likelihood gain that compensates the penalty, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sharply with negligible improvement and produces weakly separated regimes confirmed by regime-overlap diagnostics (Supplement S9). Within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> confirms adequate identifiability: there are roughly 82 observations per estimated parameter. We adopt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all subsequent analyses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of model configuration</title>
      <p id="d2e5248">All results use nHMM <monospace>5hs5dg</monospace> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">284</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with residual spatial dependence modelled within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DTW zones (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), each with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stations. For each zone and state, a state-conditional R-vine copula (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>) is fit by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and used for ensemble simulation. Forecast verification employs central 90 % prediction interval diagnostics (POC, AW, AAD) and strictly proper scoring rules (CRPS, ES, VS) under blocked cross-validation and out-of-sample tests (Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/>–<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>; Supplement S5–S9).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Climatic organization of precipitation by hidden Markov states</title>
      <p id="d2e5361">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> synthesizes austral-winter (MJJA) precipitation conditioned on the five nHMM regimes. For each column, the main map shows the conditional mean daily precipitation (mm d<sup>−1</sup>) across the 462 locations for days assigned to that state by the Viterbi path; the inset displays anomalies relative to the MJJA climatology (1980–2021). Climatologically, conditional means peak over southern Chile (40–55° S), consistent with vigorous mid-latitude cyclone activity and Andean orographic enhancement. Northern Chile (north of 30° S) remains dry in all regimes. The anomaly insets reveal a coherent dry-to-wet progression: regimes “0” and “1” exhibit widespread negative anomalies (suppressed frontal activity); regime “2” presents near-neutral, spatially patchy anomalies; and regimes “3” and “4” display robust positive anomalies from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>   to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° S, enhanced by windward ascent.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e5402">Mean precipitation and anomalies by nHMM state (MJJA, 1980–2021). <bold>(A)</bold> Conditional mean daily precipitation (mm d<sup>−1</sup>) across the 462 locations for each of the five latent states; marker size and colour are proportional to the conditional mean. <bold>(B)</bold> Precipitation anomalies (mm d<sup>−1</sup>) relative to the MJJA climatology, shown as full-size interpolated maps for readability. States “0”/“1”: dry regimes; “2”: transitional; “3”/“4”: wet regimes, strongest over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35–45° S.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5448">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows circulation composites for each state. Dry states (e.g., “1”): a ridge–high couplet with positive Z500 over the southeast Pacific and positive MSLP over central Chile displaces the storm track poleward and strengthens subsidence over 30–40° S; weakened westerlies and enhanced coastal southerlies inhibit onshore moisture flux and orographic triggering.  Wet states (e.g., “4”): a deep negative Z500 trough extending from the Amundsen–Bellingshausen sector, paired with a negative MSLP minimum south of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° S, intensifies a zonal low-level jet impinging on central–southern Chile; cyclonic curvature favours frontal genesis and baroclinic development. Transitional states (“0”, “2”, “3”) show intermediate synoptic structures consistent with episodic storm incursions. The columnwise correspondence between the MSLP and Z500 composites evidences robust vertical coupling, while the 850 hPa streamlines underscore the state-dependent Pacific moisture corridor intersecting the Andes.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e5466">Circulation composites by nHMM state (MJJA, 1980–2021). <bold>(A)</bold> Mean sea-level pressure (MSLP) anomalies (hPa) relative to the MJJA climatology; <bold>(B)</bold> 850 hPa wind streamlines, coloured by normalized wind speed; <bold>(C)</bold> 500 hPa geopotential height (Z500) anomalies (m). Contour labels indicate anomaly magnitudes. Dry regimes (e.g., State 1): ridge–high couplet with weakened westerlies. Wet regimes (e.g., State 4): trough–low couplet with an intensified westerly jet impinging on central–southern Chile.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Persistence and inter-regime transitions</title>
      <p id="d2e5492">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5"/> reports the average empirical transition matrix for MJJA 1980–2022. The matrix is diagonally dominant, evidencing persistence: the dry regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the largest self-transition probability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by the wet regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are moderately persistent (0.33–0.41), acting as transitional configurations. Direct dry–wet jumps are rare (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), dynamically consistent with the gradual synoptic reconfiguration required to transition between anticyclonic and deep cyclonic states <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.52"/>. Transitions among <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are relatively frequent, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is favoured over links between wet and dry clusters, supporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a preconditioning stage toward wetness.</p>

<table-wrap id="T5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d2e5694">Average transition probabilities (MJJA, 1980–2022). Each entry is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the empirical probability of transition <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> given current state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Bootstrap 95 % CIs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> block bootstraps of annual MJJA seasons) showed widths <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for diagonal entries and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for off-diagonal entries (not shown for conciseness).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">From/To</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">41 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">26 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">21 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">57 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">33 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">26 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">46 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5922">Analysis of annual transition proportions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1980</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2022</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via binomial Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs; beta-binomial under overdispersion), with Benjamini–Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.53"/> over all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition pairs, reveals a statistically significant decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> self-persistence at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<sup>−1</sup> (95 % CI: [0.21, 0.47] % yr<sup>−1</sup>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indicating shorter wet-regime residence over the study period (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> self-persistence is trendless (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Bridging transitions show compensating behaviour, with modest increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alongside reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> probability, suggesting more frequent cycling through transitional states rather than persistent wet occupancy. Approximately 73 % of the variance in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> arises from systematic differences among transition pairs.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e6128">Annual transition proportions and Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) trends (MJJA, 1980–2022). Points: annual proportions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Solid lines: logit-linear GLMM trends (minimum 25 nonzero years, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Shaded bands: 95 % CIs. Red dashed: significant trend after BH-FDR correction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Linkages between regimes and large-scale climate indices</title>
      <p id="d2e6208">Seasonal state occupancy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is correlated with SOI, Niño 3.4, ONI, and GMSST (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). Dry-state occupancy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlates positively with SOI and negatively with Niño/ONI; wet-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows the opposite, consistent with canonical ENSO forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.54"/>. Transitional states (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) show weaker, sign-varying associations. GMSST relates negatively to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with increased subtropical stability and a poleward baroclinicity shift under global warming <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.55"/>. The moderate magnitudes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflect the well-established feature that ENSO modulates but does not deterministically control synoptic regimes; the copula component is motivated precisely by these nonlinear, tail-enhanced associations. Spearman and Kendall rank correlations yield qualitatively identical patterns; signs remain invariant under FDR control <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.56"/> and block-bootstrap uncertainty bounds (Supplement S7).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6358">Pearson correlations between seasonal state frequencies and atmospheric indices (MJJA, 1980–2022). Asterisks: significant at the 5 % level after effective-sample-size correction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.57"/>. Signs agree with ENSO modulation; moderate magnitudes are consistent with teleconnections that modulate – not deterministically control – synoptic regimes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6372">State–index relationships (MJJA, 1980–2022). <bold>(A)</bold> ONI vs monthly frequency of the dry state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(B)</bold> ONI vs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(C)</bold> GMSST vs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Kernel-density contours; dashed: OLS fits with 95 % bands (descriptive only). Tail-enhanced associations motivate copula-based nonlinear dependence modelling.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Out-of-sample probabilistic simulations and verification</title>
      <p id="d2e6433">We evaluate the hybrid nHMM–Copula–GPD forecaster on MJJA 2022 using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daily ensemble members. The nHMM is trained on 1980–2021; the 2022 state sequence is inferred by Viterbi using observed covariates.</p>
      <p id="d2e6448">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> summarizes the DTW zone design and out-of-sample skill. Panel (A) shows the seven DTW zones with medoids marked by stars. Panel (B) shows, for six medoids (Zone 1 excluded: negligible MJJA totals in the hyperarid far north), monthly boxplots of 2022 predictive distributions (100 daily draws per day) with observed monthly means in orange; insets show daily ensembles versus observations. Ensembles reproduce the seasonal cycle and precipitation intermittency; spreads are smaller in the arid north and larger (and well-centered) in the storm-dominated south, consistent with climatological variance gradients.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6455">DTW climate zones and out-of-sample MJJA 2022 simulations. <bold>(A)</bold> Seven DTW-based climate zones (medoids: stars). <bold>(B)</bold> Monthly boxplots of MJJA 2022 predictive distributions (100 daily draws) overlaid with observed monthly means (orange). Insets: daily ensembles vs observations. Training: 1980–2021; 2022 state sequence inferred via Viterbi.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6531/2026/hess-30-6531-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6471">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/> reports interval-based metrics for MJJA 2022. Average Width (AW) increases monotonically from 6.9 mm in Zone 2 to 44.0 mm in Zone 6, reflecting the meridional gradient in climatological precipitation variance. Coverage (POC) is close to or above the nominal 90 % in all zones (88.8 %–97.7 %), confirming well-calibrated prediction intervals. Asymmetry degree (AAD) is small throughout (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with mild right-skew in Zone 2 corresponding to occasional outlier events in the arid regime.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>3.5.1</label><title>Proper scores, event-based skill, and gain from the vine-copula layer</title>
      <p id="d2e6493">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/> presents the core verification results. In the rainfall-active zones (5 and 6), CRPSS reaches 0.51 and 0.35 respectively, indicating substantial improvement over the climatological benchmark; the vine-copula layer is highly significant (Diebold–Mariano <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HAC-adjusted) and reduces mean areal CRPS by 18 % (Zone 5) and 26 % (Zone 6) relative to the conditionally independent baseline. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 25 mm exceedance events reaches 0.89 and 0.87, confirming strong discrimination. Pinball losses at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are consistently lower for the vine model, indicating that the skill gain extends to the upper quantiles most relevant for hydrological risk. Zone 3 shows a positive CRPSS of 0.23 but the vine layer is not significant (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that the copula improves the CRPS through marginal calibration rather than dependence modelling. Zone 7 (Zone covering the austral fjord region south of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>° S) shows a modest but significant CRPSS of 0.04 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); AUC could not be computed due to insufficient 25 mm exceedance events during the 2022 evaluation season.</p>
      <p id="d2e6572">For Zones 2 and 4, the areal-CRPS and CRPSS values are reported as not applicable (n/a) in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"/>. Zone 2 spans the Atacama and Coquimbo desert transition zone (approximately 25–30° S); precipitation is infrequent and concentrated in a small number of convective or orographic events, resulting in near-zero daily totals across the station network. Zone 4 covers the semi-arid Mediterranean transition of central Chile (approximately 33–38° S, including the pre-cordillera of O'Higgins, Maule, and northern Bío-Bío), a region with high within-zone precipitation variability driven by strong orographic gradients between coastal stations receiving a few hundred millimetres per year and Andean stations receiving several times more. Under both scenarios, the computation of a zone-wide  areal mean precipitation as the scoring target amplifies two distinct numerical problems: in Zone 2, the vine ensemble occasionally generates positive draws even on days when observations are universally zero, so a single such draw inflates the areal mean and causes CRPS to diverge; in Zone 4, the extreme range of precipitation totals across the zone means that rare large draws at high-elevation Andean stations – plausible given the GPD shape <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.921</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fitted for State 1 at the Zone 4 medoid, the highest shape estimate in the dataset and associated with a very small training sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">exc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) – can dominate the areal mean for that state even though they occur on days when lower-lying stations record near-zero totals. In both cases, the interval-based diagnostics in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/> (which operate at the medoid level rather than across the full heterogeneous zone) are more appropriate and show well-calibrated performance (POC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, AAD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results collectively indicate that zone-level areal scoring is not a valid evaluation tool in regions where within-zone precipitation heterogeneity is extreme, and that the framework requires dedicated treatments – including stratified or weighted areal averages and refined zero-inflation marginals – before it can be applied in semi-arid and orographically heterogeneous zones.</p>

<table-wrap id="T6"><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d2e6636">Uncertainty metrics at medoids, MJJA 2022. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> daily draws. AW: Average Width (mm) of central 90 % prediction interval; POC: empirical coverage (%); 95 % CI from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> block bootstraps; AAD: Average Asymmetry Degree. Zone 1 excluded (hyperarid far north, negligible MJJA totals).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AW (mm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">POC (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">POC 95 % CI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AAD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.873</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">96.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(93.2, 99.1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.070</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">97.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(95.3, 99.5)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26.644</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">96.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(94.1, 99.3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.016</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32.521</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">97.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(94.8, 99.4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">93.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(89.4, 96.6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone 7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11.560</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">88.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(84.2, 93.0)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.029</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="T7"><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6816">Verification summary at zone medoids, MJJA 2022. CRPSS: CRPS Skill Score (positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> better than climatology). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRPS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRPS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: mean areal-CRPS for vine and independence baseline (mm). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: Diebold–Mariano <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value (HAC one-sided; alternative: vine <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> indep). PL<sub><italic>q</italic></sub>: pinball loss at quantile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (vine/indep). AUC: ROC AUC for the 25 mm exceedance event. n/a: areal-CRPS not interpretable due to within-zone precipitation heterogeneity (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS1"/>); interval-based diagnostics in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"/> are preferred for these zones.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CRPSS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRPS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CRPS</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">AUC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.38</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.84</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.89</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.87</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup>

  <oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Zone</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PL<sub>0.90</sub> (v)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PL<sub>0.90</sub> (i)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">PL<sub>0.95</sub> (v)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">PL<sub>0.95</sub> (i)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.764</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.802</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.641</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.772</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.763</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.708</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.597</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.625</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.978</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.102</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.670</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.979</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.042</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.641</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.625</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.523</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.408</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.874</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.916</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.784</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.108</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.448</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>3.5.2</label><title>Sensitivity to modelling choices</title>
      <p id="d2e7322">Allowing Student-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> pairs in vines, varying the GPD threshold within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and changing the state count to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leaves PIT shapes, coverage, and event skill qualitatively unchanged (Supplement S9). Student-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> pairs marginally improve heavy-rain discrimination in Zones 5–6; lower GPD thresholds slightly increase over-coverage, supporting the parsimonious main specification.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Synthesis</title>
      <p id="d2e7385">The hybrid framework delivers: (i) an interpretable regime taxonomy with physically coherent dry <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> wet progression and robust vertical coupling; (ii) quantified, statistically significant trends in regime persistence consistent with documented megadrought signals; and (iii) calibrated, sharp probabilistic forecasts with significant vine-layer improvements in the rainfall-active southern zones, robust interval calibration across all zones, and well-understood limitations in semi-arid and orographically heterogeneous regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e7406">This work develops and validates a hierarchical probabilistic framework for austral-winter (MJJA) precipitation in Chile, coupling a covariate-driven nHMM with DTW-based climatic zoning and state-conditioned Regular Vine copulas augmented by GPD tails. The architecture explicitly separates temporal regime dynamics from spatial residual dependence, overcoming the conditional-independence limitation of classical HMM applications to rainfall.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Summary of scientific contributions</title>
      <p id="d2e7416">Five hidden regimes organize MJJA precipitation along a coherent dry–wet spectrum with physically interpretable circulation signatures: ridge–high couplets with weakened westerlies in dry anticyclonic states, and trough–low couplets with intensified zonal jets in wet cyclonic states (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). Regime persistence and connectivity are quantified from 1980–2022, revealing a statistically significant decline in wet-state self-transitions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<sup>−1</sup>; 95 % CI: [0.21, 0.47] % yr<sup>−1</sup>), consistent with documented drying signatures in central Chile and the negative trend in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with rising GMSST. GPD shape parameters range from bounded tails (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, anticyclonic states) to heavy tails (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ξ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, frontal states), with statistically robust differences confirmed by parametric bootstrap CIs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). Out-of-sample probabilistic skill is established in the rainfall-active zones: POC is close to nominal (89–98 %), interval widths increase meridionally as expected, AAD is small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), CRPSS is positive in all zones with interpretable scores (Zones 3, 5, 6, 7), and the vine-copula layer yields statistically significant improvements over the independence baseline in the two wettest zones (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Limitations in Zones 2 and 4 are real and explained by within-zone precipitation heterogeneity rather than methodological failure; interval-based diagnostics confirm adequate calibration at the medoid level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Relation to prior work and novelty</title>
      <p id="d2e7532">The novelty lies in the explicit integration of covariate-driven regime transitions, DTW-based zoning that respects temporal asynchronies, and state-conditioned high-dimensional R-vines with GPD tail augmentation for daily totals – a combination not previously assembled in the literature. This design preserves regime-physics interpretability while achieving multivariate coherence and extreme-aware behaviour at daily scales, capabilities difficult to obtain within a single monolithic spatiotemporal likelihood for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">462</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Hydroclimatic implications</title>
      <p id="d2e7555">The detected decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> persistence implies shorter residence times in wet, cyclone-dominated states during MJJA, directly translating into reduced winter accumulation and increasing hydroclimatic stress downstream (streamflow, snowpack, groundwater recharge). The regime classification provides a physically grounded pathway from seasonal predictors (ENSO indices, dynamical fields) to spatially consistent precipitation ensembles – through the state-transition kernel and the copula-GPD simulator – suitable for risk-aware hydroclimate operations including reservoir rule-curve testing, drought early-warning, and flood preparedness.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Limitations and pathways for improvement</title>
      <p id="d2e7585">The most pressing limitation is the inadequacy of zone-level areal-CRPS in climatically heterogeneous zones (2 and 4). The solution is threefold: replace the uniform areal average by an orographically weighted average; implement dedicated zero-inflated marginals for stations with very high dry-day frequencies; and apply stratified validation (separately for coastal and Andean sub-domains) before summarizing at the zone level. These modifications would not change the fundamental framework architecture but would extend its applicability to Chile's most climatically complex zones.</p>
      <p id="d2e7588">Other limitations include Viterbi-induced state-assignment error that can propagate to the copula layer; within-state nonstationarity that is not explicitly captured; and the modular estimation strategy that assumes conditional spatial independence during EM, though the hierarchical design repairs this in a principled and diagnostically verified manner. Future work should explore hierarchical Bayesian formulations that integrate regime, vine, and tail components with shared priors; regime-aware multivariate fields for compound-risk analysis; and assimilation of sub-seasonal dynamical predictors (MJO diagnostics, RCM output, VIMF forecasts) as transition-model covariates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Concluding remarks</title>
      <p id="d2e7599">By disentangling large-scale regime dynamics from residual spatial dependence and explicitly accounting for extremes, the nHMM–DTW–vine–GPD framework delivers meteorologically coherent regimes, quantified changes in regime persistence consistent with observed megadrought trends, and calibrated, sharp probabilistic forecasts in the rainfall-active zones of Chile. The approach reconciles physical insight with statistical parsimony and computational tractability at continental scale, offering a transferable template for probabilistic hydroclimate modelling in Chile and other mountainous, hydroclimatically heterogeneous regions, with clearly specified conditions for its applicability in arid and orographically complex environments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7607">The R code and processed precipitation inputs supporting the state-conditional marginal modelling, vine-copula simulation, statistical diagnostics, and May–August 2022 out-of-sample validation are publicly available from the GitHub repository <uri>https://github.com/mauricio-herrera/hybrid-nhmm-copula-precipitation-framework</uri>. The version used for archival citation is release v1.0.0, preserved on Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.58"/> (DOI: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23322615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23322615</ext-link>). The archive includes the R simulation and validation script in <monospace>Scripts/</monospace> and the compressed processed dataset in <monospace>Data/</monospace>. The processed data already contain regime-state assignments and DTW-based zone labels; the release therefore does not provide a complete workflow for re-estimating the upstream nHMM, climatic covariates, and DTW clustering from unprocessed source data. The underlying gridded precipitation product is CR2MET <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.59"/>. The simulations and validation were implemented in R <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.60"/>, with <monospace>VineCopula</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.61"/>, <monospace>evd</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.62"/>, and <monospace>scoringRules</monospace>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.63"/>.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e7651">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-6531-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-6531-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7660">MH-M: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization. FK: Data Curation, Methodology, Software, Visualization. DR: Conceptualization, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision. AW: Data Curation, Methodology, Visualization. AGF: Conceptualization, Writing – Review and Editing, Supervision.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7666">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7672">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7678">D. Rivera acknowledges support from FONDECYT project No. 1230520 and CISFECh (ANID/CIN250005).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7683">This research has been supported by the Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID), Chile, through the ANILLO project ATE250004 (grant no. ANID/ANILLO/ATE250004).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7689">This paper was edited by Lelys Bravo de Guenni and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aas et al.(2009)Aas, Czado, Frigessi, and Bakken</label><mixed-citation> Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A., and Bakken, H.: Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 182–198, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ailliot et al.(2009)Ailliot, Thompson, and Thomson</label><mixed-citation>Ailliot, P., Thompson, C., and Thomson, P.: Space–Time Modeling of Precipitation Using a Hidden Markov Model and Censored Gaussian Distributions, J. Hydrol., 365, 56–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.027</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arias et al.(2021)Arias, Garreaud, Poveda, Espinoza, Molina-Carpio, Masiokas, Viale, Scaff, and Van Oevelen</label><mixed-citation>Arias, P. A., Garreaud, R., Poveda, G., Espinoza, J. C., Molina-Carpio, J., Masiokas, M., Viale, M., Scaff, L., and Van Oevelen, P. J.: Hydroclimate of the Andes part II: Hydroclimate variability and sub-continental patterns, Front. Earth Sci., 8, 505467,<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.505467" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2020.505467</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Barrett and Hameed(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Barrett, B. S. and Hameed, S.: Seasonal variability in precipitation in central and southern Chile: Modulation by the South Pacific high, J. Clim., 30, 55–69, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Barría et al.(2019)Barría, Rojas, Moraga, Muñoz, Bozkurt, and Alvarez-Garreton</label><mixed-citation>Barría, P., Rojas, M., Moraga, P., Muñoz, A., Bozkurt, D., and Alvarez-Garreton, C.: Anthropocene and streamflow: Long-term perspective of streamflow variability and water rights, Elem. Sci. Anth., 7, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.340." ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.340.</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Becker and Schmitz(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Becker, E. and Schmitz, G.: Climatological effects of orography and land–sea heating contrasts on the gravity wave–driven circulation of the mesosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 103–118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;0103:CEOOAL&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;0103:CEOOAL&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bellone et al.(2000)Bellone, Hughes, and Guttorp</label><mixed-citation>Bellone, E., Hughes, J. P., and Guttorp, P.: A Hidden Markov Model for Downscaling Synoptic Atmospheric Patterns to Precipitation Amounts, Clim. Res., 15, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr015001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3354/cr015001</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Benjamini and Hochberg(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289–300, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bergmeir and Benítez(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Bergmeir, C. and Benítez, J. M.: On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation, Inform. Sciences, 191, 192–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Berndt and Clifford(1994)</label><mixed-citation> Berndt, D. J. and Clifford, J.: Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series, KDD workshop, 10, 359–370, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Boisier(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P.: CR2MET v2.5: High-resolution precipitation and temperature dataset for 1960–2021 in continental Chile, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7529682" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7529682</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Boisier et al.(2018)Boisier, Alvarez-Garretón, Cepeda, Osses, Vásquez, and Rondanelli</label><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garretón, C., Cepeda, J., Osses, A., Vásquez, N., and Rondanelli, R.: CR2MET A high-resolution precipitation and temperature dataset for hydroclimatic research in Chile,Geophysical Research Abstracts, 20, EGU2018-19739, EGU General Assembly 2018, <uri>https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-19739.pdf.</uri> (last access: 21 October 2026), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Boisier et al.(2018)Boisier, Alvarez-Garreton, Cordero, Damiani, Gallardo, Garreaud, Lambert, Ramallo, Rojas, and Rondanelli</label><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Cordero, R. R., Damiani, A., Gallardo, L., Garreaud, R. D., Lambert, F., Ramallo, C., Rojas, M., and Rondanelli, R.: Anthropogenic drying in central-southern Chile evidenced by long-term observations and climate model simulations, Elementa, 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.328</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Bozkurt et al.(2021)Bozkurt, Rondanelli, Gonzalez-Reyes, Garreaud, Muñoz, Flores-Aqueveque, Aguilera, Farias-Barahona, Lambert, and Ramallo</label><mixed-citation>Bozkurt, D., Rondanelli, R., Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Garreaud, R. D., Muñoz, A., Flores-Aqueveque, V., Aguilera, D., Farias-Barahona, D., Lambert, F., and Ramallo, C.: Climate change impacts on water availability and agriculture in Central Chile, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 1–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6789</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Burger et al.(2018)Burger, Brock, and Montecinos</label><mixed-citation> Burger, F., Brock, B., and Montecinos, A.: Seasonal and elevational contrasts in temperature trends in Central Chile between 1979 and 2015, Glob. Planet. Change, 162, 136–147, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Bárdossy and Pegram(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Bárdossy, A. and Pegram, G.: Copula-Based Multivariate Distribution Functions for Hydrological Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 46, W07536, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009WR007857</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Cavalleri et al.(2024)Cavalleri, Lussana, Viterbo, Brunetti, Bonanno, Manara, Lacavalla, Sperati, Raffa, Capecchi, Cesari, Giordani, Cerenzia, and Maugeri</label><mixed-citation>Cavalleri, F., Lussana, C., Viterbo, F., Brunetti, M., Bonanno, R., Manara, V., Lacavalla, M., Sperati, S., Raffa, M., Capecchi, V., Cesari, D., Giordani, A., Cerenzia, I. M. L., and Maugeri, M.: Multi-scale assessment of high-resolution reanalysis precipitation fields over Italy, Atmos. Res., 312, 107734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107734" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107734</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Charles et al.(2014)Charles, Timbal, and Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>Charles, S. P., Timbal, B., and Nguyen, K.: Statistical Downscaling for Assessing Simulated Precipitation over Western Victoria, Australia, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 719–732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3727</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Cioffi et al.(2020)Cioffi, Conticello, and Lall</label><mixed-citation>Cioffi, F., Conticello, F. R., and Lall, U.: Stochastic Scenarios for 21st Century Rainfall Seasonality, Daily Frequency, and Intensity in South Florida, J. Water Res. Pl., 146, 04020058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001250</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>CR2(2024)</label><mixed-citation>CR2: Centro de Ciencia del Clima y la Resiliencia, Datos de Precipitación, <uri>https://www.cr2.cl/datos-de-precipitacion/</uri> (last access: 29 April 2024), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Dawid(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Dawid, A. P.: Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views: Statistical Theory: The Prequential Approach, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. A, 147, 278–292, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2981683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/2981683</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Diebold and Mariano(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R. S.: Comparing Predictive Accuracy, J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 13, 253–263, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Franzke and O'Kane(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Franzke, C. L. E. and O'Kane, T. J. (eds.): Nonlinear and Stochastic Climate Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339251" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781316339251</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Garreaud et al.(2017)Garreaud, Alvarez-Garreton, Barichivich, Boisier, Christie, Galleguillos, LeQuesne, McPhee, and Zambrano-Bigiarini</label><mixed-citation>Garreaud, R., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Barichivich, J., Boisier, J., Christie, D., Galleguillos, M., LeQuesne, C., McPhee, J., and Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.: The 2010–2015 megadrought in central Chile: impacts on regional hydroclimate and vegetation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6307–6327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Garreaud et al.(2020)Garreaud, Alvarez-Garreton, Barichivich, and et al.</label><mixed-citation>Garreaud, R. D., Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H. H., and Veloso-Aguila, D.: The Central Chile Mega Drought (2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 421–439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6219</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Garreaud(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Garreaud, R. D.: The Andes climate and weather, Adv. Geosci., 22, 3–11, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Garreaud et al.(2009)Garreaud, Vuille, Compagnucci, and Marengo</label><mixed-citation> Garreaud, R. D., Vuille, M., Compagnucci, R., and Marengo, J.: Present-day South American climate, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 281, 180–195, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Genest and MacKay(1986)</label><mixed-citation> Genest, C. and MacKay, J.: A primer on the copula approach to modeling dependence between random variables, Stat. Sci., 7, 113–122, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Genest and Rémillard(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Genest, C. and Rémillard, B.: Validity of the Parametric Bootstrap for Goodness-of-Fit Testing in Semiparametric Models, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, 44, 1096–1127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AIHP148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/07-AIHP148</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Genest et al.(2009)Genest, Rémillard, and Beaudoin</label><mixed-citation>Genest, C., Rémillard, B., and Beaudoin, D.: Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Copulas: A Review and a Power Study, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 199–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Giorgino(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Giorgino, T.: Computing and Visualizing Dynamic Time Warping Alignments in R: The dtw Package, J. Stat. Softw., 31, 1–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v031.i07" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v031.i07</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Gneiting and Raftery(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E.: Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 102, 359–378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1198/016214506000001437</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Herrera et al.(2025)Herrera, Kleisinger, and Wilsón</label><mixed-citation>Herrera, M., Kleisinger, F., and Wilsón, A.: Spatiotemporal Forecasting in Climate Data Using EOFs and Machine Learning Models: A Case Study in Chile, arXiv [preprint], <uri>https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17495</uri> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Herrera-Marín(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Herrera-Marín, M.: Hybrid Hidden Markov–Copula Precipitation Framework, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23322615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.23322615</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, and et. al.</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hoskins and Hodges(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Hoskins, B. J. and Hodges, K. I.: A new perspective on Southern Hemisphere storm tracks, J. Clim., 18, 4108–4129, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Hughes et al.(1999)Hughes, Guttorp, and Charles</label><mixed-citation> Hughes, J. P., Guttorp, P., and Charles, S. P.: A non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for precipitation occurrence, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. C, 48, 15–30, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Jordan et al.(2019)Jordan, Krüger, and Lerch</label><mixed-citation>Jordan, A., Krüger, F., and Lerch, S.: Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts with scoringRules, J. Stat. Softw., 90, 1–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v090.i12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v090.i12</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Khalil et al.(2010)Khalil, Kwon, Lall, and Kaheil</label><mixed-citation>Khalil, A. F., Kwon, H.-H., Lall, U., and Kaheil, Y. H.: Predictive Downscaling Based on Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Models, Hydrol. Sci. J., 55, 333–350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003780342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626661003780342</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kirshner(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Kirshner, S.: Modeling of Multivariate Time Series Using Hidden Markov Models, Ph.d. Thesis, University of California, Irvine, USA, 202 pp., ISBN: 0496986732, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Latoja et al.(2025)Latoja, Lillo-Saavedra, Gonzalo-Martin, Godoy-Faúndez, Somos-Valenzuela, and Rivera</label><mixed-citation>Latoja, D., Lillo-Saavedra, M., Gonzalo-Martin, C., Godoy-Faúndez, A., Somos-Valenzuela, M., and Rivera, D.: Decadal Variability of Dry Days in Central Chile, Earth Systems and Environment, 9, 1117–1134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00526-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s41748-024-00526-6</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Mayer et al.(2021)Mayer, Mayer, and Haimberger</label><mixed-citation>Mayer, J., Mayer, M., and Haimberger, L.: Consistency and Homogeneity of Atmospheric Energy, Moisture, and Mass Budgets in ERA5, J. Clim., 34, 3955–3974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0676.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0676.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>McLachlan and Krishnan(2008)</label><mixed-citation>McLachlan, G. and Krishnan, T.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions, vol. 382, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd edn., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470191613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9780470191613</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Montecinos and Aceituno(2003)</label><mixed-citation> Montecinos, A. and Aceituno, P.: Seasonality of the ENSO-related rainfall variability in central Chile and associated circulation anomalies, J. Clim., 16, 281–296, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Montecinos et al.(2011)Montecinos, Kurgansky, Muñoz, and Takahashi</label><mixed-citation>Montecinos, A., Kurgansky, M. V., Muñoz, C., and Takahashi, K.: Non-ENSO interannual rainfall variability in central Chile during austral winter, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 106, 557–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0457-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00704-011-0457-1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Montero and Vilar(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Montero, P. and Vilar, J. A.: TSclust: An R package for time series clustering, J. Stat. Softw., 62, 1–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v062.i01" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18637/jss.v062.i01</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Nelsen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Nelsen, R. B.: An Introduction to Copulas, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2 edn., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28678-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/0-387-28678-0</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Sarricolea and Meseguer-Ruiz(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Pablo Sarricolea, M. H.-O. and Meseguer-Ruiz, Ó.: Climatic regionalisation of continental Chile, J. Maps, 13, 66–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1259592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/17445647.2016.1259592</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Pica-Téllez et al.(2020)Pica-Téllez, Garreaud, Meza, Bustos, Falvey, Ibarra, Duarte, Ormazábal, Dittborn, and Silva</label><mixed-citation>Pica-Téllez, A., Garreaud, R., Meza, F., Bustos, S., Falvey, M., Ibarra, M., Duarte, K., Ormazábal, R., Dittborn, R., and Silva, I.: Informe proyecto arclim: Atlas de riesgos climáticos para chile, Tech. rep., Centro de Ciencia del Clima y la Resiliencia, Centro de Cambio Global UC y Meteodata para el Ministerio del Medio Ambiente a través de la Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (giz), Santiago, Chile, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Chile, <uri>https://arclim.mma.gob.cl/media/informes_consolidados/Informe_ARCLIM_Consolidado_Final.pdf</uri> (last access: 21 October 2026), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Politis and Romano(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Politis, D. N. and Romano, J. P.: The Stationary Bootstrap, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89, 1303–1313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Pyper and Peterman(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Pyper, B. J. and Peterman, R. M.: Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 2127–2140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f98-104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/f98-104</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>R Core Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, <uri>https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Robertson et al.(2004)Robertson, Kirshner, and Smyth</label><mixed-citation>Robertson, A. W., Kirshner, S., and Smyth, P.: Downscaling of Daily Rainfall Occurrence over Northeast Brazil Using a Hidden Markov Model, J. Climate, 17, 4407–4424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3216.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-3216.1</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Robertson et al.(2006)Robertson, Kirshner, Smyth, Charles, and Bates</label><mixed-citation> Robertson, A. W., Kirshner, S., Smyth, P., Charles, S. P., and Bates, B. C.: Subseasonal-to-interdecadal variability of the Australian monsoon over North Queensland, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 519–542, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Rosenblatt(1952)</label><mixed-citation>Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation, Ann. Math. Stat., 23, 470–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/aoms/1177729394</ext-link>, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Sarricolea et al.(2017)Sarricolea, Herrera-Ossandon, and Meseguer-Ruiz</label><mixed-citation> Sarricolea, P., Herrera-Ossandon, M., and Meseguer-Ruiz, Ó.: Climatic regionalisation of continental Chile, J. Maps, 13, 66–73, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Schepsmeier et al.(2015)Schepsmeier, Stöber, Brechmann, Graeler, Nagler, Erhardt, Almeida, Min, and Ruckdeschel</label><mixed-citation>Schepsmeier, U., Stöber, J., Brechmann, E. C., Graeler, B., Nagler, T., Erhardt, T., Almeida, C., Min, A., and Ruckdeschel, P.: Package “VineCopula”, R Package Version 1.6.0, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.VineCopula" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32614/CRAN.package.VineCopula</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Scheuerer and Hamill(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Scheuerer, M. and Hamill, T. M.: Variogram-based proper scoring rules for probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 1321–1334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00269.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-14-00269.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Stephenson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Stephenson, A. G.: evd: Extreme Value Distributions, R News, 2, 31–32, <uri>https://journal.r-project.org/articles/RN-2002-015/</uri> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Székely and Rizzo(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Székely, G. J. and Rizzo, M. L.: Energy Statistics: A Class of Statistics Based on Distances, Stat. Sci., 28, 558–575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/13-STS437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/13-STS437</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Trenberth(2014)</label><mixed-citation> Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in Precipitation with Climate Change, Clim. Res., 47, 123–138, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Valdés-Pineda et al.(2016)Valdés-Pineda, Valdes, Diaz, and Pizarro-Tapia</label><mixed-citation> Valdés-Pineda, R., Valdes, J. B., Diaz, H. F., and Pizarro-Tapia, R.: Analysis of spatio-temporal changes in annual and seasonal precipitation variability in South America-Chile and related ocean–atmosphere circulation patterns, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2979–3001, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Vrac and Naveau(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Vrac, M. and Naveau, P.: Stochastic downscaling of precipitation: From dry events to heavy rainfalls, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07402, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005308" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006WR005308</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Vrac and Friederichs(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Vrac, M. and Friederichs, P.: Multivariate—Intervariable, Spatial, and Temporal—Bias Correction, J. Climate, 28, 218–237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00059.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00059.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Vuong(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Vuong, Q. H.: Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses, Econometrica, 57, 307–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1912557</ext-link>, 1989. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Ward(1963)</label><mixed-citation>Ward, J. H.: Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 58, 236–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845</ext-link>, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Wilks(2011)</label><mixed-citation> Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Academic Press, 3rd edn., ISBN 978-0-12-385023-2, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Zucchini et al.(2016)Zucchini, MacDonald, and Langrock</label><mixed-citation>Zucchini, W., MacDonald, I. L., and Langrock, R.: Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2nd edn., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b20790" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b20790</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Characterizing Climate-Driven Shifts in Chilean Rainfall Regimes with a Hybrid Hidden Markov–Copula Framework</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aas et al.(2009)Aas, Czado, Frigessi, and Bakken</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aas, K., Czado, C., Frigessi, A., and Bakken, H.: Pair-copula constructions of
multiple dependence, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 182–198,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ailliot et al.(2009)Ailliot, Thompson, and Thomson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ailliot, P., Thompson, C., and Thomson, P.: Space–Time Modeling of
Precipitation Using a Hidden Markov Model and Censored Gaussian
Distributions, J. Hydrol., 365, 56–73,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.027</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arias et al.(2021)Arias, Garreaud, Poveda, Espinoza, Molina-Carpio,
Masiokas, Viale, Scaff, and Van Oevelen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arias, P. A., Garreaud, R., Poveda, G., Espinoza, J. C., Molina-Carpio, J.,
Masiokas, M., Viale, M., Scaff, L., and Van Oevelen, P. J.: Hydroclimate of
the Andes part II: Hydroclimate variability and sub-continental patterns,
Front. Earth Sci., 8, 505467,<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.505467" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.505467</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Barrett and Hameed(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barrett, B. S. and Hameed, S.: Seasonal variability in precipitation in central
and southern Chile: Modulation by the South Pacific high, J.
Clim., 30, 55–69, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Barría et al.(2019)Barría, Rojas, Moraga, Muñoz,
Bozkurt, and Alvarez-Garreton</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barría, P., Rojas, M., Moraga, P., Muñoz, A., Bozkurt, D., and
Alvarez-Garreton, C.: Anthropocene and streamflow: Long-term perspective of
streamflow variability and water rights, Elem. Sci. Anth., 7, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.340." target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.340.</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Becker and Schmitz(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Becker, E. and Schmitz, G.: Climatological effects of orography and land–sea
heating contrasts on the gravity wave–driven circulation of the mesosphere,
J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 103–118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;0103:CEOOAL&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060&lt;0103:CEOOAL&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bellone et al.(2000)Bellone, Hughes, and Guttorp</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellone, E., Hughes, J. P., and Guttorp, P.: A Hidden Markov Model for
Downscaling Synoptic Atmospheric Patterns to Precipitation
Amounts, Clim. Res., 15, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3354/cr015001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3354/cr015001</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Benjamini and Hochberg(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A
Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, J. Roy.
Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289–300, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Bergmeir and Benítez(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergmeir, C. and Benítez, J. M.: On the use of cross-validation for time
series predictor evaluation, Inform. Sciences, 191, 192–213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.12.028</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Berndt and Clifford(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berndt, D. J. and Clifford, J.: Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in
time series, KDD workshop, 10, 359–370, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Boisier(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boisier, J. P.: CR2MET v2.5: High-resolution precipitation and temperature
dataset for 1960–2021 in continental Chile, Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7529682" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7529682</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Boisier et al.(2018)Boisier, Alvarez-Garretón, Cepeda,
Osses, Vásquez, and Rondanelli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garretón, C., Cepeda, J., Osses, A.,
Vásquez, N., and Rondanelli, R.: CR2MET A high-resolution
precipitation and temperature dataset for hydroclimatic research in Chile,Geophysical Research Abstracts, 20, EGU2018-19739, EGU General Assembly 2018, <a href="https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-19739.pdf." target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 October 2026), 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Boisier et al.(2018)Boisier, Alvarez-Garreton, Cordero, Damiani,
Gallardo, Garreaud, Lambert, Ramallo, Rojas, and
Rondanelli</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Cordero, R. R., Damiani, A., Gallardo,
L., Garreaud, R. D., Lambert, F., Ramallo, C., Rojas, M., and Rondanelli, R.:
Anthropogenic drying in central-southern Chile evidenced by long-term
observations and climate model simulations, Elementa, 6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Bozkurt et al.(2021)Bozkurt, Rondanelli, Gonzalez-Reyes, Garreaud,
Muñoz, Flores-Aqueveque, Aguilera, Farias-Barahona, Lambert, and
Ramallo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bozkurt, D., Rondanelli, R., Gonzalez-Reyes, A., Garreaud, R. D., Muñoz,
A., Flores-Aqueveque, V., Aguilera, D., Farias-Barahona, D., Lambert, F., and
Ramallo, C.: Climate change impacts on water availability and agriculture in
Central Chile, Int. J. Climatol., 41, 1–21,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6789</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Burger et al.(2018)Burger, Brock, and Montecinos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burger, F., Brock, B., and Montecinos, A.: Seasonal and elevational contrasts
in temperature trends in Central Chile between 1979 and 2015, Glob.
Planet. Change, 162, 136–147, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Bárdossy and Pegram(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bárdossy, A. and Pegram, G.: Copula-Based Multivariate Distribution Functions
for Hydrological Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 46, W07536,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007857</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Cavalleri et al.(2024)Cavalleri, Lussana, Viterbo, Brunetti, Bonanno,
Manara, Lacavalla, Sperati, Raffa, Capecchi, Cesari, Giordani, Cerenzia, and
Maugeri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cavalleri, F., Lussana, C., Viterbo, F., Brunetti, M., Bonanno, R., Manara, V.,
Lacavalla, M., Sperati, S., Raffa, M., Capecchi, V., Cesari, D., Giordani,
A., Cerenzia, I. M. L., and Maugeri, M.: Multi-scale assessment of
high-resolution reanalysis precipitation fields over Italy, Atmos.
Res., 312, 107734,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107734" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107734</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Charles et al.(2014)Charles, Timbal, and Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Charles, S. P., Timbal, B., and Nguyen, K.: Statistical Downscaling for
Assessing Simulated Precipitation over Western Victoria, Australia,
Int. J. Climatol., 34, 719–732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3727</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Cioffi et al.(2020)Cioffi, Conticello, and Lall</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cioffi, F., Conticello, F. R., and Lall, U.: Stochastic Scenarios for 21st
Century Rainfall Seasonality, Daily Frequency, and Intensity in South
Florida, J. Water Res. Pl., 146, 04020058,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001250</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>CR2(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
CR2: Centro de Ciencia del Clima y la Resiliencia, Datos de Precipitación,
<a href="https://www.cr2.cl/datos-de-precipitacion/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 29 April 2024), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Dawid(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dawid, A. P.: Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views:
Statistical Theory: The Prequential Approach, J. Roy.
Stat. Soc. Ser. A, 147, 278–292, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2981683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/2981683</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Diebold and Mariano(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Diebold, F. X. and Mariano, R. S.: Comparing Predictive Accuracy, J.
Bus. Econ. Stat., 13, 253–263,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Franzke and O'Kane(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Franzke, C. L. E. and O'Kane, T. J. (eds.): Nonlinear and Stochastic Climate Dynamics, Cambridge University Press,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339251" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339251</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Garreaud et al.(2017)Garreaud, Alvarez-Garreton, Barichivich,
Boisier, Christie, Galleguillos, LeQuesne, McPhee, and
Zambrano-Bigiarini</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garreaud, R., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Barichivich, J., Boisier, J., Christie, D.,
Galleguillos, M., LeQuesne, C., McPhee, J., and Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.: The
2010–2015 megadrought in central Chile: impacts on regional hydroclimate and
vegetation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 6307–6327,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Garreaud et al.(2020)Garreaud, Alvarez-Garreton, Barichivich, and
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garreaud, R. D.,
Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H. H., and Veloso-Aguila, D.: The Central Chile Mega Drought (2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 421–439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Garreaud(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garreaud, R. D.: The Andes climate and weather, Adv. Geosci., 22,
3–11, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Garreaud et al.(2009)Garreaud, Vuille, Compagnucci, and
Marengo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garreaud, R. D., Vuille, M., Compagnucci, R., and Marengo, J.: Present-day
South American climate, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 281, 180–195, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Genest and MacKay(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Genest, C. and MacKay, J.: A primer on the copula approach to modeling
dependence between random variables, Stat. Sci., 7, 113–122, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Genest and Rémillard(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Genest, C. and Rémillard, B.: Validity of the Parametric Bootstrap for
Goodness-of-Fit Testing in Semiparametric Models, Annales de l'Institut Henri
Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques, 44, 1096–1127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AIHP148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AIHP148</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Genest et al.(2009)Genest, Rémillard, and
Beaudoin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Genest, C., Rémillard, B., and Beaudoin, D.: Goodness-of-Fit Tests for
Copulas: A Review and a Power Study, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,
44, 199–213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Giorgino(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giorgino, T.: Computing and Visualizing Dynamic Time Warping Alignments in R:
The dtw Package, J. Stat. Softw., 31, 1–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v031.i07" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v031.i07</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Gneiting and Raftery(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gneiting, T. and Raftery, A. E.: Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and
Estimation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 102, 359–378,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Herrera et al.(2025)Herrera, Kleisinger, and Wilsón</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herrera, M., Kleisinger, F., and Wilsón, A.: Spatiotemporal Forecasting in
Climate Data Using EOFs and Machine Learning Models: A Case Study in Chile, arXiv [preprint], <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17495" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Herrera-Marín(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Herrera-Marín, M.: Hybrid Hidden Markov–Copula Precipitation
Framework, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23322615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23322615</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, and et. al.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from
1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store
(CDS), <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hoskins and Hodges(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoskins, B. J. and Hodges, K. I.: A new perspective on Southern Hemisphere
storm tracks, J. Clim., 18, 4108–4129, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Hughes et al.(1999)Hughes, Guttorp, and Charles</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hughes, J. P., Guttorp, P., and Charles, S. P.: A non-homogeneous hidden Markov
model for precipitation occurrence, J. Roy. Stat. Soc.
Ser. C, 48, 15–30, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Jordan et al.(2019)Jordan, Krüger, and
Lerch</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jordan, A., Krüger, F., and Lerch, S.: Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts
with scoringRules, J. Stat. Softw., 90, 1–37,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v090.i12" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v090.i12</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Khalil et al.(2010)Khalil, Kwon, Lall, and
Kaheil</label><mixed-citation>
      
Khalil, A. F., Kwon, H.-H., Lall, U., and Kaheil, Y. H.: Predictive Downscaling
Based on Non-Homogeneous Hidden Markov Models, Hydrol. Sci. J.,
55, 333–350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003780342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003780342</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kirshner(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kirshner, S.: Modeling of Multivariate Time Series Using Hidden Markov Models,
Ph.d. Thesis, University of California, Irvine, USA, 202 pp., ISBN: 0496986732, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Latoja et al.(2025)Latoja, Lillo-Saavedra, Gonzalo-Martin,
Godoy-Faúndez, Somos-Valenzuela, and Rivera</label><mixed-citation>
      
Latoja, D., Lillo-Saavedra, M., Gonzalo-Martin, C., Godoy-Faúndez,
A., Somos-Valenzuela, M., and Rivera, D.: Decadal Variability of Dry Days in Central Chile, Earth Systems and Environment, 9,
1117–1134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00526-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00526-6</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mayer et al.(2021)Mayer, Mayer, and Haimberger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mayer, J., Mayer, M., and Haimberger, L.: Consistency and Homogeneity of
Atmospheric Energy, Moisture, and Mass Budgets in ERA5, J. Clim.,
34, 3955–3974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0676.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0676.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>McLachlan and Krishnan(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McLachlan, G. and Krishnan, T.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions, vol. 382, John
Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2nd edn., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470191613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470191613</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Montecinos and Aceituno(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montecinos, A. and Aceituno, P.: Seasonality of the ENSO-related rainfall
variability in central Chile and associated circulation anomalies, J. Clim., 16, 281–296, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Montecinos et al.(2011)Montecinos, Kurgansky, Muñoz, and
Takahashi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montecinos, A., Kurgansky, M. V., Muñoz, C., and Takahashi, K.: Non-ENSO
interannual rainfall variability in central Chile during austral winter,
Theor. Appl. Climatol., 106, 557–568,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0457-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0457-1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Montero and Vilar(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Montero, P. and Vilar, J. A.: TSclust: An R package for time series
clustering, J. Stat. Softw., 62, 1–43,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v062.i01" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v062.i01</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Nelsen(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nelsen, R. B.: An Introduction to Copulas, Springer Series in Statistics,
Springer, New York, 2 edn., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28678-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28678-0</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Sarricolea and Meseguer-Ruiz(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pablo Sarricolea, M. H.-O. and Meseguer-Ruiz, Ó.: Climatic regionalisation
of continental Chile, J. Maps, 13, 66–73,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1259592" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1259592</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Pica-Téllez et al.(2020)Pica-Téllez, Garreaud, Meza, Bustos,
Falvey, Ibarra, Duarte, Ormazábal, Dittborn, and Silva</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pica-Téllez, A., Garreaud, R., Meza, F., Bustos, S., Falvey, M., Ibarra,
M., Duarte, K., Ormazábal, R., Dittborn, R., and Silva, I.: Informe
proyecto arclim: Atlas de riesgos climáticos para chile, Tech. rep.,
Centro de Ciencia del Clima y la Resiliencia, Centro de Cambio Global UC y
Meteodata para el Ministerio del Medio Ambiente a través de la Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (giz), Santiago, Chile, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Chile, <a href="https://arclim.mma.gob.cl/media/informes_consolidados/Informe_ARCLIM_Consolidado_Final.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 October 2026), 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Politis and Romano(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Politis, D. N. and Romano, J. P.: The Stationary Bootstrap, J.
Am. Stat. Assoc., 89, 1303–1313,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476870</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Pyper and Peterman(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pyper, B. J. and Peterman, R. M.: Comparison of methods to account for
autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data, Can. J.
Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 2127–2140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/f98-104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/f98-104</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>R Core Team(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
<a href="https://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Robertson et al.(2004)Robertson, Kirshner, and
Smyth</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robertson, A. W., Kirshner, S., and Smyth, P.: Downscaling of Daily Rainfall Occurrence over Northeast Brazil Using a
Hidden Markov Model, J. Climate, 17, 4407–4424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3216.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3216.1</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Robertson et al.(2006)Robertson, Kirshner, Smyth, Charles, and
Bates</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robertson, A. W., Kirshner, S., Smyth, P., Charles, S. P., and Bates, B. C.:
Subseasonal-to-interdecadal variability of the Australian monsoon over North
Queensland, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 132,
519–542, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Rosenblatt(1952)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation, Ann.
Math. Stat., 23, 470–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729394</a>, 1952.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Sarricolea et al.(2017)Sarricolea, Herrera-Ossandon, and
Meseguer-Ruiz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sarricolea, P., Herrera-Ossandon, M., and Meseguer-Ruiz, Ó.: Climatic
regionalisation of continental Chile, J. Maps, 13, 66–73, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Schepsmeier et al.(2015)Schepsmeier, Stöber, Brechmann, Graeler,
Nagler, Erhardt, Almeida, Min, and Ruckdeschel</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schepsmeier, U., Stöber, J., Brechmann, E. C., Graeler, B., Nagler, T.,
Erhardt, T., Almeida, C., Min, A., and Ruckdeschel, P.: Package
“VineCopula”, R Package Version 1.6.0, <a href="https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.VineCopula" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.VineCopula</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Scheuerer and Hamill(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scheuerer, M. and Hamill, T. M.: Variogram-based proper scoring rules for
probabilistic forecasts of multivariate quantities, Mon. Weather Rev.,
143, 1321–1334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00269.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00269.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Stephenson(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stephenson, A. G.: evd: Extreme Value Distributions, R News, 2, 31–32,
<a href="https://journal.r-project.org/articles/RN-2002-015/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 October 2026), 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Székely and Rizzo(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Székely, G. J. and Rizzo, M. L.: Energy Statistics: A Class of Statistics
Based on Distances, Stat. Sci., 28, 558–575,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/13-STS437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/13-STS437</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Trenberth(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trenberth, K. E.: Changes in Precipitation with Climate Change, Clim.
Res., 47, 123–138, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Valdés-Pineda et al.(2016)Valdés-Pineda, Valdes, Diaz, and
Pizarro-Tapia</label><mixed-citation>
      
Valdés-Pineda, R., Valdes, J. B., Diaz, H. F., and Pizarro-Tapia, R.:
Analysis of spatio-temporal changes in annual and seasonal precipitation
variability in South America-Chile and related ocean–atmosphere circulation
patterns, Int. J. Climatol., 36, 2979–3001, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Vrac and Naveau(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vrac, M. and Naveau, P.: Stochastic downscaling of
precipitation: From dry events to heavy rainfalls, Water Resour. Res., 43, W07402, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005308" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005308</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Vrac and Friederichs(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vrac, M. and Friederichs, P.: Multivariate—Intervariable, Spatial,
and Temporal—Bias Correction, J. Climate, 28, 218–237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00059.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00059.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Vuong(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vuong, Q. H.: Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested
Hypotheses, Econometrica, 57, 307–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557</a>, 1989.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Ward(1963)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ward, J. H.: Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 58, 236–244,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845</a>, 1963.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Wilks(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Academic Press,
3rd edn., ISBN 978-0-12-385023-2, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Zucchini et al.(2016)Zucchini, MacDonald, and
Langrock</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zucchini, W., MacDonald, I. L., and Langrock, R.: Hidden Markov Models for Time
Series: An Introduction Using R, Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC, 2nd edn., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b20790" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b20790</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
