<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-30-6381-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Climate change impacts on groundwater simulated using the AquiFR modelling platform</article-title><alt-title>Climate change impacts on groundwater simulated</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Jeantet</surname><given-names>Alexis</given-names></name>
          <email>alexis.jeantet@meteo.fr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3197-6693</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Vergnes</surname><given-names>Jean-Pierre</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Munier</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-8584</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Habets</surname><given-names>Florence</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1950-0921</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire de Géologie, CNRS UMR 8538, École Normale Supérieure, PSL University, IPSL, Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS UMR 3589, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Water, Environment, Processes and Analyses Division, BRGM – French Geological Survey, Orléans, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alexis Jeantet (alexis.jeantet@meteo.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>30</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>6381</fpage><lpage>6420</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>February</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Alexis Jeantet et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e123">In the context of increasing water stress and climate change, the assessment of changes in groundwater resources has become a major challenge for water decision-makers. As part of the EXPLORE2 project, this study aims to estimate changes in groundwater levels on French aquifers during the 21st century. We use the hydrogeological modelling platform AquiFR, forced by 36 regional climate projections from Eurocordex (CMIP5), bias-corrected according to a state-of-the-art method, based on three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs): RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. To better reflect uncertainties, four storylines based on the RCP8.5 scenario have been selected to represent possible futures that illustrate the impacts of worst-case scenarios, to help decision-makers to adopt sustainable groundwater management policies. The future evolution of groundwater is assessed using the standardized piezometric level index, a normalized indicator of groundwater level that provides return periods based on the distribution value over a reference period – in this case 1975–2004. The analyses revealed significant variability between regional climate models. The predominant signal is an increase in groundwater levels, affecting most of the study area, particularly in northern France. This result is in contrast to previous studies in this area. Under the RCP8.5 (highest greenhouse gas emissions scenario), the evolution of the occurrence of current 10-year return period events shows a significant increase in the risk of high groundwater levels, primarily on the northern part of France, which is consistent with 3 out of the 4 storylines. This is accompanied by an increase in the 10-year low groundwater levels mostly observed in the southern part of the French aquifer systems represented by AquiFR. This pattern is shared by all four storylines. This finding underscores a discernible North-South distinction. The increase in the severity of events is a well-known consequence of climate change on surface hydrology, but is less prevalent in groundwater hydrology, which is characterised by a longer residence time.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Office Français de la Biodiversité</funding-source>
<award-id>Not relevant</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement Durable et de l'Énergie</funding-source>
<award-id>Explore2 project</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e135">In France, groundwater supports 70 % of drinking water, supplying both domestic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.1"/> and agricultural sectors, the latter accounting for one-third of agricultural withdrawals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.2"/>. Therefore, understanding and anticipating future groundwater temporal evolution is crucial for stakeholders and decision-makers involved in the sustainable management of water resources, especially because this evolution depends on both human activities and climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.3"/>. In addition, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) asserts that a large proportion of hydrological systems (e.g., surface rivers, groundwater tables, …) are already being affected on a global scale and will be further impacted in the coming decades due to climate change <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"/>. Among the projected changes figures the intensification of extreme events in terms of floods and droughts, in both frequency and intensity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.5"/>, potentially affecting groundwater management.</p>
      <p id="d2e153">Several projects have provided a first global assessment of the consequences of climate change on French hydrology, e.g., the EXPLORE 2070 project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.6"/> using climate projections provided by the Coupled-Model Intercomparison Project 3 (CMIP3) global exercise. More recent projects used climate projections from the CMIP5 global exercise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.7"/>, which were regionalized over France by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.8"/>, to assess the future of groundwater on specific watersheds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.9"/>. These studies projected a widespread drop in groundwater levels induced by a decrease in recharge of between 10 % and 25 %, with spatial variations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.10"/>. Two areas were particularly severely affected: the Loire basin, where recharge decreases by 25 % to 30 % over half of its surface; and South-West France, where the decreases ranges between 30 % and 50 %. The EXPLORE 2070 project, which was completed with a surface hydrology assessment, enabled the magnitude of the challenge of defining national adaptation or attenuation strategies for numerous sectors of activity (e.g. energy and agriculture) to be better measured <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e175">However, more recent studies suggest that the impact of climate change on French hydrological systems, including groundwater, is more contrasted, particularly in northern France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.12"/>, highlighting the need for a new general assessment of the impact of climate change on French hydrology. In line with IPCC recommendations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.13"/>, the EXPLORE2 project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.14"/> aims to update the conclusions of these previous studies, in particular with regard to groundwater. This project provides an opportunity to study larger areas and more aquifers of interest.</p>
      <p id="d2e187">In such a context, studying the impact of climate change on hydrological systems requires the use of a hydroclimatic modelling chain, ranging from updated greenhouse gas emission scenarios to hydrological indicators, and established as best as possible on a multi-model ensemble approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="paren.15"/>. The principle is to use several radiative forcing scenarios, climate models and hydro(geo)logical models to quantify the uncertainty associated with the projections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.16"/>. Indeed, each climate model differs in elements such as precipitation distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.17"/> which necessarily leads to different projections at the end of the modelling chain. Consequently, using multiple models at each step is strongly recommended <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx94 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.18"/>. Ultimately, the challenge for modellers is to assess the uncertainties inherent to the amount of obtained results, for example by identifying converging patterns or, conversely, the absence of a robust trend from all projections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.19"/>. Given the potential divergence in results derived from global climate projection datasets, a second approach has recently emerged: the use of storylines. These are contrasted climate projections, each based on distinct design assumptions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.20"/>. The objective is to emphasis the variability of climate change impacts while maintaining the physical consistency of each projection, avoiding the aggregation of results as in probabilistic approaches.</p>
      <p id="d2e210">In order to provide consistent information on groundwater, the use of models providing realistic representations of aquifer systems is required <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.21"/>. Therefore, the hydrogeological part of the modelling chain is often composed of spatially distributed hydrogeological regional models built over specific studies areas at the regional scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.22"/>. In this respect, the hydrogeological platform AquiFR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.23"/> is a relevant candidate as the platform integrates two distributed hydrogeological modelling software packages with several regional models, in order to account for the heterogeneity of French aquifers. However, although the AquiFR platform integrates several hydrogeological software packages, it is not based on a multi-model approach, as each package is applied to a specific catchment and almost no simulated areas overlap spatially. Despite this limitation, the AquiFR system is already operational for historical reanalysis of groundwater, real-time monitoring and seasonal forecast, when coupled with the SURFEX land surface model to provide recharge over its entire domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.24"/>, especially for the assessment of dry events to help decision-makers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e228">As part of a study on the impact of climate change on French groundwater, CMIP5 global climate projections have already been used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.26"/> to force AquiFR. However, since then, the projections have been updated and a new assessment is required. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.27"/> have also already assessed the impact of climate change on French groundwater resources, but using a single-layer aquifer model at a coarser spatial configuration than AquiFR, with a set of five climate projections. These elements highlight the importance of the present study. As part of the EXPLORE2 project, we aim to assess the impact of climate change projected by regional climate models on several French aquifers of interest. To this end, the hydrogeological modelling platform AquiFR is used to simulate hydrogeological projections based on 36 climate projections that use three future socio-economic scenarios. These projections are a subset of the Euro-CORDEX project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.28"/> resulting from the CMIP5 exercise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.29"/>, which have been downscaled with a method combining weather typing and quantile mapping approaches. The primary contribution of this paper lies in its utilisation of a large ensemble of climate projections used to better account for climate internal variability – a dimension that has been poorly carried out in the literature, particularly with respect to the evolution of groundwater under climate change. Additionally, this work places specific emphasis on four contrasting projections from the EXPLORE2 dataset. These projections are utilised as storylines to explore the range of climate change impacts on groundwater, an approach that, to our knowledge, has been rarely adopted in existing literature. Finally, the use of the AquiFR platform enables the integration of heterogeneous aquifer systems, representing another key strength of this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e243">It is important to clarify that this study does not explicitly address the impacts of anthropogenic factors on water resources, as the EXPLORE2 project was designed to disentangle climate change impacts from those of human activities. This separation aims to provide stakeholders with clear, actionable insights for developing targeted adaptation measures. Consequently, all anthropogenic factors, including land use and groundwater abstraction, are held constant throughout the 21st century simulations. Nevertheless, previous work using the AquiFR platform has demonstrated that groundwater abstraction, by inducing declines in groundwater levels, can substantially reduce aquifer-river exchange fluxes, with significant implications for headwater basin dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.30"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Regionalized climate projections from EXPLORE2</title>
      <p id="d2e264">The climate projections (CPs) used to force the AquiFR platform primarily originates from the DRIAS-2020 database (DRIAS 2021; <uri>http://www.drias-climat.fr/</uri>, last access:  25  October, 2024) which provides downscaled and unbiased climate projections on the French region. This database is based on a subset of projections from the Euro-CORDEX project (CooRdinated Downscaling EXperiment – European Domain; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="altparen.31"/>), which is included in CMIP5 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.32"/>. As part of the EXPLORE2 database implementation, the original DRIAS-2020 database has been extended to include the latest EURO-CORDEX simulations with evolving aerosol forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.33"/> resulting in the EXPLORE2-Climat 2022 database.</p>
      <p id="d2e279">To obtain future climate variables, General Circulations Models (GCMs; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="altparen.34"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="altparen.35"/>) are forced by Radiative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), greenhouse gas emission scenarios that follow specific socio-economic trajectories through the 21st century. However, GCM outputs have a coarse spatial resolution of around 2.5°, i.e., between 100 and 200 km, which is insufficient to adequately represent local meteorological phenomena and extreme events. This prevents them from being directly used as climate forcing in hydrological models for regional or local scale studies. Thus prior to use a statistical downscaling method, a dynamic downscaling is made by using RCMs (Regional Climate Models) to provide detailed estimates of meteorological parameters (e.g., temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind, solar radiation, …) at an hourly time step for regional applications using a dynamic downscaling approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.36"/>, with a spatial resolution from 10 to 20 km.</p>
      <p id="d2e291">Then, the ADjustment to MOuNTain regions (ADAMONT; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="altparen.37"/>) method is applied to the RCM outputs to both improve spatial resolution and correct bias according to an historical meteorological reference by a two-steps method: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e300">Weather regime computation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.38"/>: each day from both the RCMs and the meteorological reference is clustered into one of four weather regimes, based on the clustering of the geopotential height at 500 hPa from the ERA-40 analysis, per each one of the four seasons: (1) December, January, February (DJF); (2) March, April, May (MAM); (3) June, July, August (JJA); (4) September, October, November (SON). Then, quantile distributions of each climate variables from both the RCMs and the meteorological reference are computed for the 16 weather regime/season combinations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89" id="paren.39"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e310">Quantile mapping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.40"/>: for each couple, quantile mapping is applied to the quantile distributions of RCMs climate variables, which are adjusted according to the meteorological reference.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e316">The historical meteorological reference used is the SAFRAN reanalysis (“Système d'Analyse Fournissant des Renseignements Adaptés à la Nivologie” in French; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.41"/>), which provides “pseudo-observed” data useful for bias correction across France.</p>
      <p id="d2e323">At the end of the procedure, the CPs simulated by the GCM/RCM couples provide downscaled climate variables at hourly time step and on a regular grid of 8 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 km. The total set comprises 6 GCMs coupled with 9 RCMs, and forced by 3 RCPs : (1) RCP2.6, a stringent mitigation scenario which assumes an efficient international environmental policy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.42"/>; (2) RCP4.5, an intermediate stabilisation scenario <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.43"/>; (3) RCP8.5, a very high green house gas emission scenario without efficient environmental international policy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.44"/>. The EXPLORE2 project uses 17 GCM/RCM pairs forced by one to three RCPs, for a total of 36 simulations (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> in Appendix A), all downscaled and bias-corrected by ADAMONT.</p>
      <p id="d2e344">The large number of GCM/RCM couples in the EXPLORE2 ensemble is one of the project's main strengths, which allows to better account for uncertainty when extracting future trends using a probabilistic approach. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.45"/> identified climate components as being the primary source of uncertainty in particular for precipitation, which is the main factor influencing recharge and, consequently, groundwater. Indeed, the climate models can produce different results for the same future scenario, depending on the formulation and parametrisation of physical and thermodynamic processes, which can vary considerably from one model to another, as well as on the spatial resolution. Further details on the biases induced by each specific GCM and RCM can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.46"/>. In light of this divergence, which limits the extraction of future trends using a probabilistic approach, a second approach is adopted. This approach involves selecting four contrasting storylines (i.e., CPs based on contrasted trends) from the available GCM/RCM couples using the RCP8.5. This allows us to focus on four contrasting possible futures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx75" id="paren.47"/>. Unlike the probabilistic approach, the aim here is to consider each narrative individually to maintain its physical consistency without mixing it with the other narratives in the set. The selected storylines are <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.48"/>: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e361">Orange storyline (EC-EARTH/HadREM3-GA7-05 couple): climate affected by a strong warming and very dry in the summer;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e365">Green storyline (HadGEM2-ES/ALADIN63 couple): serious warming and increased rainfall;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e369">Purple storyline (HadGEM2-ES/CCLM4-8-17 couple): serious warming in temperature and strong seasonal contrast in precipitation with the winter season having large amount of precipitation, while summer season has low amount of precipitation;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e373">Yellow storyline (CNRM-CM5/ALADIN63 couple): future changes remaining relatively low;</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e376">It should be noticed that the latter CMIP6 projections are not used here, since they have not yet been downscaled or bias-corrected at the regional level, which prevents their use for regional studies. However, the EXPLORE2 dataset was compared with projections from CMIP6, and the projections used here are included within the CMIP6 confidence interval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.49"/>. This lends credibility to the use of these climate projections, particularly given that they have been used in recently published papers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.50"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e385">Following the recommendations of the EXPLORE2 project, the analyses of CPs were conducted over four time periods comprising 1 historical period and 3 future horizons for a total time frame ranging from 1975 to 2099. This considers that an hydrological year is set from 1 August to 31 July  (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e393">Temporal splitting of the climate projections from the EXPLORE2 project.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Historical period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Short-term horizon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Intermediate horizon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Long-term horizon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1975–2004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The AquiFR modelling platform</title>
      <p id="d2e454">AquiFR is a hydro-meteorological modelling platform regrouping existing models, one model being defined as a pair of catchments and the hydrogeological modelling software used, to simulate French rivers and groundwater systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.51"/>. Each model is developed and configured for a specific region to meet the needs of stakeholders. The platform was assessed over a sixty-year period <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.52"/>, and has demonstrated good performance in simulating groundwater levels, compared to observed piezometric heads from the ADES (“Accès aux Données sur les Eaux Souterraines”) database (<uri>http://www.ades.eaufrance.fr/</uri>, last access:   29 November 2024, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.53"/>). Nowadays, the AquiFR platform is used in an operational context for real-time monitoring and seasonal forecasting on the main sedimentary basins and aquifers for groundwater decision-makers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>The SURFEX modelling platform</title>
      <p id="d2e479">A specific feature of AquiFR is that the SURFEX modelling platform (“SURFace EXternalisée” in French; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.55"/>) is used to solve the water and energy balances at the surface-atmosphere interface from the atmospheric forcings. This is achieved using several land surface schemes dedicated to each land use category. More specifically, only the ISBA (“Interactions Sol – Biosphère – Atmosphère” in French; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="altparen.56"/>) land surface scheme, which is included in the SURFEX modelling platform, is used to simulate the continental area. ISBA allows a direct coupling with an atmospheric model, with a spatial resolution adaptable to a wide range of grid sizes, from hundreds of kilometers (e.g., when coupled to a global climate model) to a few kilometers for more local studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.57"/> or for hydrological studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.58"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e494">The atmospheric forcing used to force SURFEX varies depending on the purpose, either the SAFRAN historical reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.59"/> for historical reanalysis and real-time monitoring or seasonal forecasting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.60"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e503">Eventually, SURFEX simulates surface runoff and drainage homogeneously across all the aquifers simulated by AquiFR. These are both diagnostic variables that constitute the groundwater recharge terms used to force the hydrogeological models implemented in AquiFR. Note that no feedback mechanisms from AquiFR to SURFEX are used here. Such mechanisms could provide a more accurate representation of actual evapotranspiration, particularly when groundwater level reaches the root zone. However, the contribution of groundwater to actual evapotranspiration in France does not exceed 2 % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.61"/>, which suggests that feedback mechanisms can be reasonably neglected.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Hydrogeological modelling software</title>
      <p id="d2e517">Two physically-based hydrogeological modelling software packages have been integrated into the AquiFR platform: EauDyssée <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.62"/> and MARTHE (“Modélisation des Aquifères avec un maillage Rectangulaire, Transport et HydrodynamiquE” in French; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="altparen.63"/>). These software packages represent sedimentary aquifers, with an explicit representation of river-aquifer exchanges and a simplified transfer process within the unsaturated zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.64"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e529">EauDyssée comprises several modules, including, among the most important ones, one dedicated to simulate multilayer aquifers using a finite difference numerical scheme to solve the groundwater diffusivity equation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.65"/>. This approach is based on 2D horizontal groundwater flows and vertical exchange through aquitards, in order to represent both unconfined and confined aquifers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.66"/>. Then, a second module uses matrix-based version of the Muskingum routing scheme for river routing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.67"/>, to calculate discharge simultaneously through a river network, and exchanges with groundwater in both directions by coupling with groundwater modules.</p>
      <p id="d2e541">MARTHE is the hydrogeological modelling software program developed by the French Geological Survey (BRGM), which simulates coupled groundwater flows and mass transfers and rivers flows using single-layer to multilayer aquifers and hydrographic networks. MARTHE simulates groundwater flows using a 3-dimensional finite volume approach to solve the hydrodynamic equation based on Darcy’s law and mass conservation on a regular rectangular grids, and coupled to a kinetic wave approach used to simulate river flows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx90" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e547">Note that while EauDyssée and MARTHE simulate rivers discharges and groundwater-river exchanges, this study focuses exclusively on groundwater level projections. The choice is motivated to focus the reader attention of groundwater levels and because studies included in the EXPLORE2 project already carry out the future evolution of river discharge under climate change over hexagonal France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.69"/>. Furthermore, groundwater abstraction is simulated at a monthly time step for each model, using a climatology-based approach that relies on historical data. As stated in the introduction section, groundwater abstraction rates are assumed to remain unchanged in future projections, thereby allowing the isolation of climate change impacts on groundwater dynamics. More detailed information about hydrogeological modelling software are provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.70"/>. In practice, the hydrogeological modelling software packages are simultaneously and synchronously forced by the runoff and drainage simulated by SURFEX and connected via a Python software. The AquiFR results are provided in a homogeneous format defined according to an irregular spatial grid with a resolution ranging from 100  to 2000 m on a monthly time step <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.71"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Spatial coverage of the AquiFR domain</title>
      <p id="d2e567">In this paper, the AquiFR domain is defined as the spatial extent of the 13 models simulated within the AquiFR platform (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/> in Appendix A). These models are mostly located in the large sedimentary basin in the North part of France, spanning the Poitou-Charentes region, the Loire and the Parisian basin, up to the Nord Pas-de-Calais region. Two other models are located further out: MARTHE Alsace covering an area of around 1100 km<sup>2</sup> in East of France, and MARTHE Tarn-et-Garonne, of a similar size, which is the only model located in the southern part of mainland France. For the remaining models, the surface areas of the aquifer systems within the models vary between around 7000 and 66 000 km<sup>2</sup>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e594">Spatial distribution of the AquiFR models. The numbers refer to the IDs of each model regrouped in Appendix A (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e605">On the Somme and the Basse-Normandie basins, both EauDyssée and MARTHE are used. In these cases, the simulations are carried out separately using the two different hydrogeological software packages, and the resulting models may overlap spatially (to account for the potential evolution of the groundwater edge). Therefore, priority is given to the most accurate models on top of the maps when plotting, and when performing the corresponding analyses. This order corresponds to the ID numbering presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/>, from the uppermost surface layer to the deepest layer, and is applied to all spatial projection results in this article.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Method used to analyse the climate change projections</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Standardized Piezometric Level Index</title>
      <p id="d2e626">The following analyses use the Standardized Piezometric Level Index (SPLI; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="altparen.72"/>) to examine the evolution of the groundwater level over the AquiFR domain. The SPLI is a normalised indicator of monthly water table level very useful to evidence the evolution compared to the distribution on a reference period, regardless of the study area's intrinsic hydrogeological heterogeneity. The advantage of the SPLI is that it provides an easy-to-interpret indication of whether the groundwater level is above or below the median state for the given month. The greatest advantage lies in mapping, as maps of the groundwater level are linked to the topography, whereas SPLI maps allows to interpret the state of the aquifers compared to the past reference evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx91" id="paren.73"/>. Therefore, the SPLI is widely used by the French Geological Survey (BRGM) over France, as well as for seasonal forecasts with AquiFR for the French aquifer systems represented by the platform.</p>
      <p id="d2e635">The SPLI is based on the same approach as the well-known Standard Precipitation Index (SPI; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.74"/>). First, 12 series of monthly groundwater levels are extracted from the reference historical time series, one for each month from January to December, from a historical time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Second, monthly cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) are extracted from the monthly groundwater levels, which are then used to fit empirical distribution functions based on standard normal distributions using a non-parametric Kernel Density Estimation (KDE, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b) using the scikit-learn Python package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.75"/>. The KDE is estimated using the Epanechnikov kernel (i.e., with a parabolic form) and the bandwidth-selection procedure controlling the smoothing follows the Silverman's rule of Thumb, to get an optimized estimator of bandwidth. Third, the adjusted CDF from the KDE is projected over a standardized normal distribution using a quantile-quantile projection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c), deducing the SPLI value. Eventually, each groundwater level value from an evaluated period (example with the piezometer 01266X1013_S1 located in the Seine-Oise basin on Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>a) is converted into a SPLI value (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>d), which corresponds to the return period of the equivalent event in the historical reference period.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e674">General approach for constructing the SPLI. “KDE” refers to the Kernel Density Estimation used to estimate the best probability density function fitting the reference CDF from reference water table level mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">REF</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The piezometer 01266X1013_S1, located in the Seine-Oise basin, is used as an example to illustrate the conversion of a time series groundwater water level into a SPLI time series, according to the CDF extracted from the reference period.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e695">The SPLI values are centred on 0, which corresponds to a simulated groundwater level close to the median of the groundwater levels in the reference series. Negative values indicate a lower level, i.e., for events lower (and thus drier) than the median, up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 (corresponding to a very low water level), while positive values indicate a higher level, i.e., for a wetter event, up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3. The range of SPLI values associated with return periods (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is divided into seven mutually exclusive categories (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>).</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e724">Classification of groundwater heads (H) assessed following the SPLI values and the associated return period corresponding to the historical reference. Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.76"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Classification</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SPLI values</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Return periods</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Very low H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Low H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Between 5-year dry and 10-year dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relatively low H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Between 2.5-year dry and 5-year dry</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Around the normal state</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Between 2.5-year dry and 2.5-year wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relatively high H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Between 2.5-year wet and 5-year wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">High H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.84; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Between 5-year wet and 10-year wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Very high H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year wet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Groundwater evolution under climate change</title>
      <p id="d2e960">In this paper, the evolution of groundwater is first analysed in term of the spatial distribution of the median of the SPLI values across the 3 horizons of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> and under the 3 RCPs. The medians of the SPLI values from each pixel of a model are extracted for each future horizon and each RCP, illustrating the temporal evolution of the medians of the SPLI in each RCP/horizon couple. This evaluation is performed for each GCM/RCM couple in order to illustrate the uncertainty related to CPs.</p>
      <p id="d2e965">A second analysis is carried out on the occurrence of each category of events, by examining the temporal evolution of the proportion of the AquiFR domain that is affected by the corresponding dry or wet events (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>). In practice, the SPLI values from all models are regrouped and the proportion of surface affected by a specific return period is defined as the sum of each pixel's surface dedicated to this return period, and divided by the total surface area of the AquiFR domain. This procedure is performed on the results from all the projections. For graphical analyses, a 5-year temporal rolling median SPLI is calculated for each RCP with an envelope representing the difference between the minimum and maximum values, to enable comparison of future trends between each RCP. As the year 2005 marks the transition between the historical and the future periods in the simulations provided by the CPs, the period from 2003 to 2007 is excluded from this analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e970">The significance of the trends observed between the reference period and the horizons of the 3 RCPs is assessed using two statistical tests: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e975">The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.77"/> is used to evaluate the significance of the difference between historical and future trends of SPLI values from 2021 to 2099. The test is performed using the Scipy Python package, and the null hypothesis is that distributions are identical;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e982">The Mann-Kendall test <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.78"/> on the future SPLI values is used to assess whether the associated trend of future SPLI values significantly evolves over time. The test is performed using the pyMannKendall Python package, the null hypothesis is that there is no monotonic trend in the future SPLI values.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e988">For each storyline, the tests are performed on the 5-year temporal rolling median from the corresponding GCM/RCM couple. When considering all the CPs, in order to provide more integrated analysis for each RCP, the tests are performed on the median from the 5-year temporal rolling medians over the available GCM/RCM couples. For each statistical test, the significance threshold is set at a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05.</p>
      <p id="d2e1006">A third set of analysis focuses on hydrogeological extreme events, which are defined here as decadal events, i.e., with a probability to occur each year of 0.1 in present day ( at least 10-year events in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), for both wet and dry events. The spatial distribution of the median proportion of time corresponding to these extreme wet events is analysed, per future horizon and per RCP.</p>
      <p id="d2e1011">The following analyses mostly focus on the results extracted from the RCP8.5. The results corresponding to the RCP2.6 and RCP4.5 will be provided in Appendix C. Furthermore, all the analyses performed on the total set of available CPs (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/>) are also performed individually on the four storylines selected in the EXPLORE2 project (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>) in order to compare the statistical trends extracted from all the combined CPs, and the trends obtained when using few plausible futures that conserve all their physical consistency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.79"/>. This second approach is therefore more deterministic regarding the scenario represented by the storyline.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Spatial evolution of the french groundwater level over the 21st century</title>
      <p id="d2e1038">The SPLI maps for each RCP8.5 projection of the median value over the long-term horizon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>) show heterogeneity between the different projections, from dry to wet values. Some GCM/RCM couples, such as the orange storyline (EC-EARTH/HadREM3-GA7-05 couple), lead to a increase in the area corresponding to dry events, specifically 10-year events which span almost the entire AquiFR domain on the long-term horizon. On the contrary, other couples like the green storyline (HadGEM2-ES/ALADIN63) and the IPSL-CM5A-MR/RCA4 couple lead to predominantly stable or increasing groundwater levels for the three horizons, with a large area characterised by median groundwater level above the 10-year wet level throughout the entire period.</p>
      <p id="d2e1043">Overall, most of GCM/RCM couples lead to an increase in groundwater level across the domain (11 out of 17, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 65 %), while 4 induce a decrease (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 %) and 2 induce relatively stable values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 %).</p>
      <p id="d2e1067">Focusing on the purple storyline, the results indicate stable groundwater levels in the northern part of the domain for the short-term horizon while in the Beauce and in the Loire basin, groundwater levels increase (median above 2.5-year wet). This pattern changes over time, with conditions close to normal for the intermediate and long-term horizon over the major part of the domain, except in the Basse-Normandie region with decreasing trend. The yellow storyline shows the least changes. Groundwater levels in southern Beauce, the Loiret department and the northern part of the Loire basin decrease slightly (median SPLI below the 2.5-year dry, and around normal elsewhere). Similar results are observed for the long-term horizon, except in the northern France (Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Basse-Normandie), where groundwater levels slightly increase (median SPLI between 2.5- and 5-year wet). Let us note that the MARTHE Tarn-et-Garonne and MARTHE Alsace models show an opposite trend with decreasing groundwater levels for all the storylines, corresponding to extreme dry events, from the short-term horizon for Alsace and from the long-term horizon for Tarn-et-Garonne.</p>
      <p id="d2e1070">The same analyses for the short-term (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB7"/>) and the intermediate horizons (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB8"/>) under the RCP8.5 are available in Appendix B. Despite the divergent results, two main patterns are distinguishable: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1079">From the northern part of the AquiFR domain to the southern part of the Loire basin, the median of the groundwater levels increases up to what is today considered as 5-year wet events on the short-term and intermediate horizons, and to extreme wet events on the long-term horizon;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1083">On the contrary, the median of the groundwater levels remains stable in the southern AquiFR domain (e.g., Tarn-et-Garonne) for the short-term horizon and decrease then to reach a 5-year dry events in the long term horizon.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e1087">These findings suggest a North-South divide in the future evolution of groundwater level over the AquiFR domain under the RCP8.5, as highlighted by 3 out of the 4 storylines (green, purple and yellow).</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1092">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the RCP8.5 on the  long-term horizon (2071–2099), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The coloured rectangles indicates the GCM/RCM couples corresponding to the storylines (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f03.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1103">Under the RCP2.6 (Figs.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/> and  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB3"/> in Appendix B respectively for the three horizons), projections show the largest heterogeneities. On the long-term horizon, 4 out of 10 GCM/RCM couples (40 %) project an increase of the groundwater level to a relatively high value, 3 couples (30 %) project almost no change and 3 couples (30 %) project a decrease of the groundwater level, especially the ones related to the EC-EARTH GCM. These results are consistent across the three horizons. Similarly, projections with RCP4.5 for the short-term and intermediate horizons (see Figs.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB5"/>) are divergent, preventing any statement as to the future trend in groundwater levels for this scenario. On the long-term horizon (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB5"/>), the results are more homogeneous with 6 out of 9 GCM/RCM couples inducing increasing groundwater level corresponding to high values over more than half of the AquiFR domain, while 3 couples induce either no change or slight decrease of the groundwater level.</p>
      <p id="d2e1119">Due to these large heterogeneities in the results from all the CPs, we focus the further analyses on the storylines, while the results corresponding to all the CPs are available in Appendices B and C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Evolution of the occurrence of wet and dry events</title>
      <p id="d2e1130">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> illustrates the temporal evolution of the percentage of the surface within the AquiFR surface area that falls into one of the six SPLI categories (in line), as defined in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>, for the four storylines under the RCP8.5. The left column corresponds to wet events and the right column to dry events. Overall, the results depend largely on the hypotheses on which the storylines are based. The results show strong temporal variabilities, mostly on the 10-year events, probably related to climate natural variability. The orange storyline tends to significantly decrease the surface affected by wet events and increase the ones affected by 10-year and 5-year dry events. The surface corresponding to 10-year dry events almost reaches 60 % of the AquiFR domain by the end of the 21st century. The green storyline induces an increase the surface related to wet events, i.e., 10-year wet events covering almost 20 % of the AquiFR domain (from 3.7 % on the historical period), and a decrease of the surface dedicated to dry events, except for the 10-year dry event where the surface increases to 10.2 %. The changes induced by the purple and the yellow storylines are smaller, except for both wet and dry extreme events where the contrasts are particularly pronounced. These two storylines tends to increase the extreme events (mainly the purple storyline) and reduce the surface allocated to 2.5-year events. These results are confirmed by the statistical tests with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values below 0.05 for almost all the 6 categories of events (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC1"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC2"/>), meaning that the future is significantly different from the reference period (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and changes significantly over the 21st century (Mann-Kendall test), for the four storylines.</p>
      <p id="d2e1148">The results for all the CPs are available in Appendix C (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC3"/>). The results show that the envelopes between the minimum and maximum values are wide, mainly for the extreme events, which highlights the heterogeneity between the projections. The surfaces related to 10-year events increase for both wet and dry events, spreading with time and increasing greenhouse gas emission, particularly for wet events. The surface related to extreme dry events is also projected to increase, albeit with a much less pronounced trend, reaching at most 10.0 % under the RCP8.5. The changes of surface proportions corresponding to the 5-year dry or wet events are low, slightly increasing for the wet events, and decreasing for the dry events. Eventually, both dry and wet 2.5-year events are expected to decrease over the 21st century, indicating an intensification of extreme events, which aligns with the findings from the storylines.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1157">Temporal evolution of the running median of proportion from the AquiFR domain affected by the categories of events from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/> for the four storylines. The lines represent the return periods of the events, for the wet events (left) and dry events (right). The gap centered on 2005 corresponds to the exclusion of the 2003–2007 period in the calculation of running medians (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). The black line represents the historical median of each category from all the available CPs.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Evolution of the time spent in extreme events</title>
      <p id="d2e1178">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> illustrates the maps of the median of the time proportion corresponding to extreme events (i.e., at least 10-year events), for wet (1st line) and dry (2nd line) events for the four storylines on the long-term horizon. The results for the short-term and intermediate horizons are available in Appendix C (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC2"/>). In consistency with the previous analyses, the results vary depending on the storyline. The orange storyline tends to reduce the time proportion corresponding to extreme wet events to less than 5 % over almost the entire AquiFR domain, while increasing the time proportion of extreme dry events to more than 75 % over the whole domain. The green storyline strongly increases the time proportion of extreme wet events while reducing the one corresponding to extreme dry events. The purple storyline induces an increase in both wet and extreme dry events, higher as time goes to 2100, and representing more than 50 % of the time over half of the AquiFR domain by the end of the 21st century. The results for the yellow storyline are more spatially and temporally contrasted and do not highlight a noticeable future tendency over the 21st century.</p>
      <p id="d2e1185">The results for all the CPs (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC3"/>) show that, in the short-term horizon, the time proportion of extreme wet events corresponds to almost half of the time over half of the AquiFR domain for the three RCPs. This proportion remains close to the historical conditions over the remaining part of the domain. Then, this time proportion increases as time goes to 2100, primarly in the northern part of the AquiFR domain. Results for the time proportion corresponding to extreme dry events are more contrasted. On the long-term horizon, the results suggest a decrease of the median of the time proportion in extreme dry event with values on more than half of the AquiFR domain under the RCP2.6 and RCP4.5. Under the RCP8.5, the results show a decrease of the time proportion in the northern part of the AquiFR domain, and higher values on the southern part of the domain, suggesting a North-South contrast in the evolution of the time proportion corresponding to extreme dry events.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1192">Spatial distribution of median of time proportion corresponding to extreme events (i.e., at least 10-year return period), respectively for wet (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, 1st line) and dry events (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, 2nd line), for the long-term horizon for the four storylines (in column) under the RCP8.5.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Divergent projections limiting the extraction of clear future tendency</title>
      <p id="d2e1245">In this study, the evolution of the groundwater is simulated by the AquiFR modelling platform using 36 climatic projections spread over 3 socio-economic scenarios RCPs. As highlighted in the introduction section, the use of such an extensive range of CPs enables a robust assessment of uncertainties associated with internal climate variability. When combined with the exploration of four distinct storylines to illustrate contrasting future scenarios, this methodological approach remains rare in the existing literature, particularly in studies examining groundwater dynamics under climate change. Furthermore, the AquiFR platform provides a noticeable advantage by accounting for the heterogeneity of aquifers across the French aquifers covering by the platform. This capability is further enhanced by the integration of the SPLI, which facilitates spatially explicit analyses of future groundwater level trends. Collectively, these elements – the CP ensemble, the storyline-based approach, and the high-resolution aquifer modelling – represent the primary scientific advancements of this paper, with direct implications for groundwater management and climate adaptation strategies.</p>
      <p id="d2e1248">The results demonstrate that the spatial distribution of the SPLI median varies between the projections, resulting in an uncertainty that restrains the identification of a clear trend regarding the future evolution of groundwater. This uncertainty is to be expected as the study area falls within the transition zone of the Atlantic region marked by a large internal variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.80"/>, where expected trends shift from a wetter climate in the North to a drier climate in the South <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.81"/>. Therefore, there is a lack of consensus among the CPs regarding the location of the transition zone, thereby inducing divergence in the future evolution of groundwater levels.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Uncertainty arising from the AquiFR forcings</title>
      <p id="d2e1264">This inherent uncertainty that is frequently observed in hydroclimatic modelling chains based on a multi-model approach is a recurring point in the literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.82"/> and requires a proper evaluation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.83"/>. To be accurate, a rigorous uncertainty analysis must consider the contribution of each element in the modelling chain to the total uncertainty: (1) climate scenarios such as RCPs or, more recently, SSPs (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways) in the CMIP6 global exercise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.84"/>; (2) global (GCMs) and regional (RCMs) climate models; (3) debiasing and downscaling methods such as ADAMONT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.85"/> or CDF-t <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.86"/>; (4) hydrological component (models and associated parameters); (5) irreducible fraction of uncertainty due to internal climate variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.87"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1286">In the context of the EXPLORE2 project, an uncertainty propagation analysis has been carried out by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.88"/> on surface hydrology over hexagonal France, by estimating the variance inherent in each link in the modelling chain. Their results indicated that the main contributor to the total uncertainty is internal climate variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %). Subsequently, the following sources contributing the most are the GCMs and the RCMs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % of combined contribution), in similar proportion, especially in North and East of France corresponding to the large majority of the AquiFR domain. These elements are in accordance with the literature, which states that the cumulative GCM/RCM contribution often reaches 40 % to 80 % of the total uncertainty <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92 bib1.bibx84 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.89"/>. Moreover, they are consistent with the analyses showed in this paper suggesting that the results strongly depends on the GCM/RCM couples. In South of France, including the MARTHE Tarn-et-Garonne model, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.90"/> demonstrated that the RCPs constitute the third source contributing the most to the total uncertainty, which can be attributed to a weaker influence of precipitation in these regions than on the rest of the country, and as a consequence a heightened influence of temperature evolution, over the 21st century.</p>
      <p id="d2e1312">At mid-latitudes including France, the uncertainty related to internal variability and the GCMs/RCMs may originate from the chaotic nature of precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.91"/>, rainfall being caused by multiple factors, that affects the accuracy of hydrometeorological forecasts and long-term projections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.92"/>, and induces divergence among the CPs. The future evolution of rainfall over France is consistent with this statement (see Appendix D on the long-term horizon for the three RCPs). The divergence is most pronounced for the RCP8.5 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD3"/>) for which the quantiles Q10 and Q90 between the CPs exhibit opposite trends, while the Q50 quantile delineates a North-South divide, characterised by an increase in rainfall in northern France, and a decrease in the southern regions. Conversely, the results from the RCP2.6 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD1"/>) and the RCP4.5 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD2"/>) demonstrate slightly lower divergence. This finding suggests that the larger the number of CPs per scenario, the more the contribution from internal variability and the GCMs/RCMs to the total uncertainty is highlighted. The real evapotranspiration, drainage and runoff, simulated by the SURFEX land surface model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.93"/>; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>), are also submitted to this large divergence among the CPs, especially under the RCP8.5. This divergence is even larger for the variables drainage and runoff, which are the primary drivers of aquifer recharge. This result is in accordance with the existing literature on the subject, which indicates that the two variables in question are characteristic of the near-surface soil horizon, which is strongly affected by rainfall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.94"/>. As these two variables are used to force AquiFR, it is reasonable to assume that the observed divergence in the SPLI primarily originates from the earlier stages in the modelling chain. Note that the uncertainties highlighted in the CP ensemble – and their propagation through the modelling chain – may be transferable to other mid-latitude regions where, as mentioned above, precipitation projections exhibit high variability due to the precipitation inherent chaotic nature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.95"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Uncertainty arising from the hydrogeological modelling</title>
      <p id="d2e1347">The hydrogeological part may also contribute to uncertainty, and a proper evaluation evaluation of this contribution would require a multi-model approach for the hydrogeological component of the modelling chain, which is not the case for the AquiFR platform (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.96"/> demonstrated that the simulated outcomes derived from two hydrogeological software packages closed to the ones used in AquiFR, i.e., based on analogous physical approaches and forced by the same surface fluxes, were similar. Thus, we can assume that models with spatial overlap in the AquiFR region may yield comparable results, and consequently that the contribution of hydrogeological components in the modelling chain to overall uncertainty is relatively minor compared to that of climate components. However, as stated above, a thorough assessment of the hydrogeological contributions to total uncertainty is necessary to substantiate this claim.</p>
      <p id="d2e1355">While this kind of assessment remains unfeasible, we can nevertheless evaluate the influence of climate projections on historical reference distributions of groundwater levels. Indeed, part of the uncertainty is linked to the fact the climate projection cannot be fully unbiased over the historical period, which might affect simulated groundwater levels. This is rather explicit when computing SPLI over the historical period, since the projections are not compared to present day observations or reference simulation, but to present day climate simulation, which are all different. The CDFs extracted from projected groundwater series are used to fit an empirical distribution function (based on a Kernel Density Estimation KDE), on which a standard normal distribution is projected in order to get the SPLI (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). Therefore, if climate projections introduce too much bias into groundwater levels, the CDFs and consequently the SPLI values are biased, which thereby bias the interpretation of future groundwater levels. To evaluate this effect, we compare the CDFs obtained from CPs with a reference CDF obtained using the reference atmospheric forcings over the historical period. To maintain consistency with the bias correction method of applied on the used CPs (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.97"/>), the SAFRAN historical reanalysis product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.98"/> is used as the meteorological reference. For each model, the evaluation is carried out by first calculating a CDF of the model extracted per CP over the historical period. Second, the spatial mean of CDFs from each CP is calculated with a 95 % confidence interval. Third, from the simulations obtained by forcing AquiFR with SAFRAN on the historical period, a reference CDF is calculated. Fourth, the average CDF obtained from the CPs is compared to the reference CDF. This evaluation is performed for each of the 12 months and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> illustrates results for January.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e1372">Comparison of CDFs from the reference reanalysis SAFRAN with those from CPs calculated on the historical period (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), for the month of January. The IDs of each model correspond to the abbreviations from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/> in Appendix A.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e1386">For almost all models, the CDFs from CPs are relatively close and distributed on either side of the reference CDFs, with average projected CDFs following the trends of the reference CDFs quite well. This suggests that the mean distribution of groundwater level obtained from CPs is analogous to the distribution obtained from the SAFRAN historical reanalysis over the historical period. Similar analyses were carried out on the 12 months of the hydrological year and led to analogous results. The largest differences are evident in March and April, indicating that the CPs diverge on this period, i.e., the end of the wet period and the beginning of the dry period and so the end of the recharge period of water tables. This period is also characterised by significant inter-annual variability, which is difficult to represent in climate models. Overall, these results suggest that the construction of SPLI by the AquiFR simulations is not noticeably affected by the use of CPs. Therefore, the discrepancies between the SPLI values observed on the future horizons are unlikely to be induced by the construction of the CDFs from the CPs on the historical period. Instead, it is more likely that these discrepancies are due to the divergences from the CPs on the future period, and thus from the climate components of the modelling chain (GCMs and RCMs). This statement is in agreement with the results highlighted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.99"/> on surface hydrology, as mentioned-above.</p>
      <p id="d2e1392">However, for a specific model, the CDFs from CPs are never fully merged, suggesting discrepancies directly induced by the adjustment of the CDFs by CPs. Consequently, if these CDFs are too divergent, this may result in SPLI values pertaining to different categories of events from one CP to another (Table 4), particularly due to the presence of threshold effects on the studied aquifers. This may contribute to the uncertainty associated with the SPLI, and then on both sign (dry/wet) and severity of the corresponding event.</p>
      <p id="d2e1395">Let us note that the discrepancies of the CDFs of the CPs in present day attest that the bias correction method is not fully efficient, which is expected. Indeed, even a perfect bias correction method would lead to different results due to the inherent internal variability included in each CP. More robust studies are required, accounting for both the need for an accurate method and the complexity of hydrogeological modelling.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Groundwater evolution over the 21st century</title>
      <p id="d2e1407">Faced to the divergences observed between all the available CPs in the multi-model ensemble approach, the extraction of reliable future trends is quite challenging and strongly depends on the RCP considered. As regards the RCP8.5, two tendencies have been identified, primarly through to the utilisation of storylines which demonstrate analogous future evolutions despite being based on contrasted future evolutions consistent with their design assumptions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.100"/>. First, groundwater level from the northern part of the AquiFR domain (i.e., Seine, north of Loire catchment, Basse Normandie and Nord Pas de Calais) is expected to increase toward wetter events, mostly corresponding to 10-year wet groundwater level of the reference period. The green storyline induces this increase from the short-term horizon over most of the AquiFR domain, while this increase starts from the long-term horizon for the yellow (Nord Pas de Calais and Basse-Normandie) and the purple (on the Beauce and the Loire catchment) storylines. Second, a decrease in groundwater level from the southern part of the AquiFR domain (i.e., south of Loire catchment and Tarn-et-Garonne) and from the Alsace catchment is expected, at least to levels corresponding to 5-year dry events on the reference period on the South of the AquiFR domain on the long-term horizon. The orange storyline enhances this decrease to the entire AquiFR domain, reaching levels corresponding to 10-year dry events on the reference period. The yellow storyline also induces a slight decrease of groundwater level from south of Loire to the southern part of the AquiFR domain.</p>
      <p id="d2e1413">This North-South contrast in the evolution of groundwater levels under the RCP8.5 is highlighted by both the majority of the CPs and by 3 out of the 4 storylines, and appears to be the consequence of the North-South contrast observed in future precipitation projections derived from climate models used in the EXPLORE2 project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.101"/>. In this paper, the spatial representation of South of France into the AquiFR platform is limited, which prevents the existence of this North-South divide from being highlighted with certainty. However, these findings are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.102"/>, who predict an increase in groundwater level in the northern part of the French metropolitan area as time goes to 2100, and a decrease in the southernmost sectors of France, using a subset of the RCP8.5 DRIAS projections. Moreover, in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1"/>, we demonstrated that this contrast is already visible in earlier stages of the modelling chain, in particular on the drainage and runoff variables simulated by SURFEX and which constitute the main drivers of the aquifers recharges (see Appendix D). For RCP8.5 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD3"/>), the North-South divide is already visible for precipitation and real evapotranspiration but the contrast remains moderate. Conversely, the contrast is much clearer for the groundwater recharge term across the three quantiles, particularly for drainage, with northern France becoming wetter and southern regions drier. Note that the Q90 quantile still highlights a decrease in drainage in regions close to the Pyrenean mountains. All these elements are consistent with joint research from the EXPLORE2 project on groundwater recharge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.103"/> and surface hydrology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.104"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1433">Nevertherless, some differences with our findings and the conclusions extracted from the literature are to be noticed. Indeed, the conclusions drawn for the northern part of the AquiFR domain are not consistent with previous studies which, as mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/>, suggested a global decrease of both recharge and groundwater level over France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.105"/>. The divergence may come from that CPs from the CMIP5 global project are wetter than the ones from the CMIP3 global project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.106"/> from which these previous studies were based on, particularly over northern France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.107"/>. Hydrological systems are therefore directly affected by this additional amount of water into the water balance between the two versions of the projections. In this way, the consistency between the present results and the ones from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="text.108"/> was to be expected as they used the hydrogeological MARTHE model, included in the AquiFR platform, and CPs provided by the DRIAS-2020 database, which are included into the CP database established by EXPLORE2. However, the main difference is that the MARTHE hydrological software package was configured on a coarser spatial grid of 2 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km, and their study is based on 5 selected regionalized CPs, while in this paper 17 different GCM/RCM combinations have been used.</p>
      <p id="d2e1458">Moreover, most of studies addressing surface hydrology under climate change state that the seasons will be more contrasted in the future, e.g., winter flows will be higher while summer will be lower <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.109"/>, shift that can be attributed to a seasonal regime change of rainfall and evapotranspiration balances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.110"/>. However, by assessing the spatial distribution of SPLI for each one of the 12 months of the year (not shown here), we found similar results for each month, suggesting no modification in the seasonal regime of groundwater level. This phenomenon may be attributed to the slow temporal dynamics characterising the aquifers in the study area, particularly those close to the Parisian Basin which constitute a large part of the AquiFR domain. Indeed, these aquifers are subject to variations that often extent beyond the hydrological year and even span multi-decadal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.111"/>. This renders the observation of sub-annual variations a highly arduous undertaking.</p>
      <p id="d2e1471">Let us note that the storylines inducing contrasted yet possible future evolutions highlight their usefulness to groundwater decision-makers, especially when they do not converge. The northern part of the AquiFR domain, i.e., from Nord Pas-de-Calais to the South of the Loire basin, is the sector where the contrast between the storylines is the most pronounced, particularly in the long-term horizon. In this context, the storylines can encourage the decisions-makers to establish their policy based on the less favourable projection, i.e., the “worst case scenario” (or precautionary principle), or using no-regrets measures based on the consequences of climate change on other surface variables such as the different seasonal flows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="paren.112"/> or the 20-year return period quantile of the annual maximum daily flow to characterise floods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.113"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1480">The extraction of tendencies for the RCP2.6 and the RCP4.5 was an ardous task, because the projections are too divergent to give confidences on the evolution of the groundwater, especially on the short-term and the intermediate horizons. On the long-term horizon under the RCP2.6, the results are still quite divergent, yet they do underscore an increase of groundwater with values that reach the 5-year to 10-year wet return period of the reference. Under the RCP4.5, this result is in line with the statement established by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.114"/> on the climate aspect of the EXPLORE2 project, which projects a 3.5 % increase in precipitation on the long-term horizon under this RCP in North of France, encompassing the majority of the AquiFR domain (see Appendix <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD2"/>). This additional amount of precipitation increase water supply, groundwater recharge and ultimately raise groundwater levels in these areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e1488">As stated in the introduction section, this study does not address the impacts of anthropogenic factors on water resources, which constitutes a major limitation of this work. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>, groundwater abstractions currently applied to the studied aquifers, thus defined according to current water availability and water demand, are supposedly maintained in the future and do not change regardless of groundwater level evolution and groundwater availability to meet future water demand. This assumption may be rendered moot by the fact that, according to several projections, groundwater level is expected to decrease over the 21st century, specifically in the southern AquiFR domain. In such cases, it is imperative that current groundwater abstractions need to be adapted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.115"/> to future conditions. In further assessments, including adapting groundwater abstraction could prove to be a crucial element in enhancing the persistency of our analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Hydrogeological extreme events under climate change</title>
      <p id="d2e1504">In this study, hydrogeological extreme events are defined as decadal events, i.e., at least 10-year events (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>), for both wet and dry events. The results show that the surface affected by extreme wet events increases by the end of the 21st century as both time goes to 2100 and greenhouse gases are released by the RCP. For RCP8.5, extreme wet events increase by a factor of 4.5 on the long-term horizon considering all the CPs, a trend supported by 3 out of 4 of the storylines (green, purple and yellow). The increase of wet events could affect surface water, resulting in an increased risk of flooding, as shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="text.116"/> in northern France, due to the strong influence of groundwater dynamics on the amount of water in rivers and wetlands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.117"/>. Let us note that the orange storyline predicts a different future trend characterised by a total disappearance of extreme wet events.</p>
      <p id="d2e1515">Conversely, the results also show an increase in extreme dry events, as confirmed by the four storylines, which correspond to a decrease of more regular events, i.e., 2.5-years events. It should be noted that even the green storyline induces this increase of extreme dry events, despite its design assumption leading to a larger amount of precipitation. Furthermore, the orange storyline leads to a much larger increase, by a factor of 25 of the extreme dry events, covering almost the entire AquiFR domain. In this case, groundwater recharge may decrease, a phenomenon already observed in some locations nowadays, e.g., the Champagne region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.118"/>. The areas where these increases are larger are Alsace, Poitou-Charentes and Tarn-et-Garonne on the RCP8.5. However, for most of the CPs and the 3 remaining storylines (green, purple and yellow), this increase is lower than the one for wet events. Therefore, the meteorological droughts announced in the EXPLORE2 project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.119"/> do not appear to noticeably involve hydrogeological droughts in the large majority of the AquiFR domain. This is differs notably from recent hydrological drought assessments, which clearly indicate an intensity of drought events, whether in terms of low flows observed or periods of no flow, particularly in South of France <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx85" id="paren.120"/>. This result contradicts the results from the EXPLORE 2070 project which suggested a strong increase of hydrogeological droughts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.121"/>. As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>, the CPs used in the EXPLORE2 project are wetter than the ones used in the EXPLORE 2070 project <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.122"/>. As such, the ones from EXPLORE2 are likely to induce fewer dry events than those used in the EXPLORE 2070 project. Furthermore, the aquifers corresponding to the study area are defined by annual or multi-annual temporal dynamics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.123"/> and often involve groundwater-river interactions, whereby the groundwater feeds the river <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.124"/>. Therefore, droughts may be observed at the surface without having a direct effect on groundwater.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e1552">The purpose of this study is to identify the main impacts of climate change on groundwater levels in the French regions covered by the AquiFR platform: Nord Pas-de-Calais, Basse-Normandie, Parisian Basin, Loire, Poitou-Charentes, Alsace and Tarn-et-Garonne. To achieve this, the hydrogeological modelling platform AquiFR, which gathers 13 different models (a model being the combination of a study aquifer with the associated hydrogeological software package), is connected to a hydroclimatic modelling chain. The latter is based on a multi-model ensemble approach, with 36 climate projections under the RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The future evolution of groundwater level is assessed using the SPLI, a normalised indicator of groundwater level, which allows various types of aquifer to be compared simultaneously. The results show that future trends diverge depending on the GCM/RCM couples, either on the spatial distribution of median SPLI or on areas associated with extreme events, defined as 10-year events, i.e., characterised by return periods of more than 10 years.</p>
      <p id="d2e1555">Under the RCP8.5, the divergences from the 17 CPs are substantial, but two main trends have been identified, mostly thanks to the use of four storylines defined in the EXPLORE2 project. First, an increase in groundwater levels (with return periods greater than 5 years) is expected in the northern part of the AquiFR domain (Nord Pas-de-Calais, Parisian Basin, Normandie), a statement supported by 3 out of the 4 storylines. Second, a decrease in groundwater levels is expected in the southern part (Poitou-Charentes and Tarn-et-Garonne), but with a lower intensity than the increase in the northern AquiFR domain. All four storylines confirm this evolution, and the orange storyline (the driest one) extends this increase of dry event to the entire AquiFR domain, with groundwater levels reaching 10-year dry events on the reference historical period (1975–2004).</p>
      <p id="d2e1558">The RCP8.5 produces the largest amplification of both dry and wet extreme groundwater levels, and induces the most pronounced North-South differentiation, with a transition zone along the northern border which depends on the GCM/RCM couple. While this study alone is insufficient to prove the existence of a North-South divide over France due to the limited spatial extent in South of France, the results are consistent with those from several other studies dealing with climate change impacts on French hydrology, especially the joined researches carried out in the EXPLORE2 project on groundwater recharge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.125"/> and surface hydrology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="paren.126"/>, which justifies the authors' confidence in this conclusion. Furthermore, the use of the storylines may encourage the decision-makers to adopt the precautionary principle and select the worst case situation when establishing a sustainable groundwater management policy.</p>
      <p id="d2e1567">For the RCP2.6 and RCP4.5, the results are too divergent on the short-term horizon (2021–2050) and the intermediate-term horizon (2041–2070) to extract reliable future trends. While still being quite divergent, the results on the long-term horizon are more convergent and show an increase of groundwater level mostly in the northern AquiFR domain, i.e., Normandie, Nord Pas-de-Calais, Parisian Basin. For the RCP4.5, this increase in groundwater levels corresponds to extreme wet events on the historical period. For the most remote areas (Tarn-et-Garonne and Alsace), the results diverge too much from one GCM/RCM couple to another to extract reliable future trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e1571">There are several potential ways in which this work could be improved, such as integrating more models into the AquiFR platform to enhance its representativeness for the different French hydrogeological contexts, especially in South of France. Similarly, using other hydrogeological modelling software per model could substantial improve the reliability of the study, particularly in terms of accurately assessing the propagation of uncertainties along the modelling chain. Eventually, considering the very close relationship between water policy (including water use) and water availability, future work should integrate socio-economic considerations into physically-based models to make water demand dependent on water availability.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title/>
      <p id="d2e1585">The elements from Appendix A are related to the Material and Method section. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> regroups all the GCM/RCM combinations available in this study, with the RCPs used to force them, and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA2"/> regroups the characteristics of the 13 models included in the AquiFR platform.</p>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e1596">Availability of climate projections. The numbers (2.6, 4.5, and 8.5) refer to the RCPs used by the GCM (rows)/RCM (columns) couples. “–” indicates missing data.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ALADIN 63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">RACMO 22E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">HadREM3-GA7-05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RCA4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">HIR HAM5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">WRF 381P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">CCLM4-8-17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">RegCM4-6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">REMO 2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">REMO 2015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CNRM-CM5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EC-EARTH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IPSL-CM5-MR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HadGEM2-ES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MPI-ESM-LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">2.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NorESM1-M</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">4.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">8.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TA2"><label>Table A2</label><caption><p id="d2e2177">Characteristics of the 13 studied models included in the AquiFR platform. The IDs refer to each model illustrated on Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model IDs</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Abbreviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Catchment</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Surface (km<sup>2</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Hydrogeological model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Som</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Somme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7506</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Npc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nord – Pas-de-Calais</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13 332</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Als</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Alsace</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1079</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Poc</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Poitou-Charente</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19 326</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Teg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tarn-et-Garonne</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1139</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bno</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Basse-Normandie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7646</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">MARTHE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seineoise</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seine – Oise</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15 968</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seineeure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seine – Eure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9318</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Marneloing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Marne – Loing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10 861</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Marneoise</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Marne – Oise</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7285</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bassenormandie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Basse-Normandie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3626</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Seine</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">65 696</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Loire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Loire</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38 746</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">EauDyssée</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title/>
      <p id="d2e2476">The figures from Appendix B are related to the spatial repartion of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the RCP2.6 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/> and  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB3"/>) and under the RCP4.5 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB4"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB5"/> and  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB6"/>) respectively on the short-term, intermediate-term and long-term horizons. The similar ones are available under the RCP8.5 (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB7"/> and   <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB8"/>) on the short-term and intermediate-term horizons.</p>

      <fig id="FB1"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e2498">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP2.6 on the  short-term horizon (2021–2050), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f07.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB2"><label>Figure B2</label><caption><p id="d2e2513">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP2.6 on the  intermediate-term horizon (2041–2070), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f08.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB3"><label>Figure B3</label><caption><p id="d2e2527">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the RCP2.6 on the long-term horizon (2071–2099), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f09.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB4"><label>Figure B4</label><caption><p id="d2e2541">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the RCP4.5 on the short-term horizon (2021–2050), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f10.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB5"><label>Figure B5</label><caption><p id="d2e2556">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP4.5 on the  intermediate-term horizon (2041–2070), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f11.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB6"><label>Figure B6</label><caption><p id="d2e2570">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP4.5 on the  long-term horizon (2071–2099), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f12.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB7"><label>Figure B7</label><caption><p id="d2e2584">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP8.5 on the  short-term horizon (2021–2050), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The colored rectangles indicates the GCM/RCM couples corresponding to the storylines (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f13.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB8"><label>Figure B8</label><caption><p id="d2e2601">Spatial distribution of the SPLI median over the AquiFR domain under the  RCP8.5 on the  intermediate-term horizon (2041–2070), following the different GCM (in column)/RCM (in line) combination. The last line corresponds to couples where RCMs are used only once. The colored rectangles indicates the GCM/RCM couples corresponding to the storylines (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). The missing panels indicate the GCM/RCM couples not included in the EXPLORE2 climate projection dataset.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f14.jpg"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title/>
      <p id="d2e2623">The elements from Appendix C are related to the analyses performed on the temporal evolution of the running median affected by the categories of events for the four storylines (see Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC1"/> and  <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC2"/>) and for all the CPs (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TC3"/>), and for the time proportion spend in extreme events for all the CPs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC3"/>).</p>

<table-wrap id="TC1" orientation="landscape"><label>Table C1</label><caption><p id="d2e2640">Results from Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and Mann-Kendall (MK) test for the orange and green storylines under the RCP8.5 on each category of events from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. The direction of the trend is provided if both tests are significant, as well as the corresponding median areas affected for all three horizons.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Historical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Orange </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col11" align="center">Green </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Temporal periods </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1975–2004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">21.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">19.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">11.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">14.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">5.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">21.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">58.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TC2" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><label>Table C2</label><caption><p id="d2e3621">Results from Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and Mann-Kendall (MK) test for the purple and yellow storylines under the RCP8.5 on each category of events from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. The direction of the trend is provided if both tests are significant, as well as the corresponding median areas affected for all three horizons.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">Historical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">Purple </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col11" align="center">Yellow </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Temporal periods </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1975–2004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">18.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">19.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">22.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">16.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.177</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="TC3" specific-use="star" orientation="landscape"><label>Table C3</label><caption><p id="d2e4595">Results from Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and Mann-Kendall (MK) test for all the available climate projections on each category of events from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. The direction of the trend is provided if both tests are significant, as well as the corresponding median areas affected for all three horizons.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="15">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="14" colname="col14" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="15" colname="col15" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Historical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col4" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">RCP2.6 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col8" nameend="col11" align="center" colsep="1">RCP4.5 </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col12" nameend="col15" align="center">RCP8.5 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Temporal periods </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1975–2004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">2021–2050</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">2041–2070</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">2071–2099</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15">Future general trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">9.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">16.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">12.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.660</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">10.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">9.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">9.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">19.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">19.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">17.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">18.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">18.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">17.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">14.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[2.5; 5] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">18.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">15.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">14.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">10.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">[5; 10] years dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>↘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10-year dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>↗</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.603</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AquiFR coverage (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">4.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">6.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col14">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col15"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e5869">Temporal evolution of the 5-year running median of proportion of area from the AquiFR domain affected by the categories of events from Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. From top to bottom are represented the 3 return periods, and from left to dry the wet and dry events. The minimum and maximum values over the set of GCM/RCM couples are also plotted. The gap between the historical curve (in grey) and the future curves under the three RCPs corresponds to the exclusion of the 2003–2007 period centred on 2005 in the calculation of running medians (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). The dashed black line represents the median value over the historical period gathering all the available projections.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FC2"><label>Figure C2</label><caption><p id="d2e5888">Spatial distribution of the median of the time proportion corresponding to extreme wet events (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, <bold>a</bold>) and extreme dry events (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, <bold>b</bold>) for the short-term and intermediate horizons (in line) for the four storylines (in column).</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f16.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FC3"><label>Figure C3</label><caption><p id="d2e5937">Spatial distribution of the median of the time proportion corresponding to extreme wet events (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, <bold>a</bold>) and extreme dry events (SPLI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.28, <bold>b</bold>) per future horizon (in line) and per RCP (in column), from all the CPs.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f17.jpg"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <label>Appendix D</label><title>Appendix D</title>
      <p id="d2e5993">The elements from Appendix D are related to the analyses performed on four variables from the water balance, i.e., the total rainfall from the CPs and three variables simulated by SURFEX (real evapotranspiration, drainage and runoff), which contributes the most to the groundwater recharge.</p>

      <fig id="FD1"><label>Figure D1</label><caption><p id="d2e5998">Spatial distribution of the total rainfall (1st column) from the CPs for the RCP2.6, and of the real evapotranspiration (2nd column), the drainage (3rd column) and the runoff (4th column) simulated by the land surface model SURFEX. The results are represented by the quantiles Q10, Q50 and Q90 from all the CPs over the long-term horizon (2071–2099).</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f18.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FD2"><label>Figure D2</label><caption><p id="d2e6013">Spatial distribution of the total rainfall (1st column) from the CPs for the RCP4.5, and of the real evapotranspiration (2nd column), the drainage (3rd column) and the runoff (4th column) simulated by the land surface model SURFEX. The results are represented by the quantiles Q10, Q50 and Q90 from all the CPs over the long-term horizon (2071–2099).</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f19.jpg"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FD3"><label>Figure D3</label><caption><p id="d2e6027">Spatial distribution of the total rainfall (1st column) from the CPs for the RCP8.5, and of the real evapotranspiration (2nd column), the drainage (3rd column) and the runoff (4th column) simulated by the land surface model SURFEX. The results are represented by the quantiles Q10, Q50 and Q90 from all the CPs over the long-term horizon (2071–2099).</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6381/2026/hess-30-6381-2026-f20.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6042">As part of the AquiFR project led by the OFB (“Office Français pour la Biodiversité” in French for French Office for Biodiversity), the AquiFR modelling platform is not directly hosted on any public repository.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6048">The climate and hydrogeological projections (water table levels and corresponding SPLI values) are available on the DRIAS-Eau database (<uri>https://drias-eau.fr/</uri>, last access:  25 October 2024).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6057">AJ, JPV, SM and FH conceptualised the work. AJ and JPV performed the simulations and analyses. AJ drafted the paper. JPV, SM and FH all revised the paper and contributed to its analyses and discussions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6065">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6071">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6077">The authors want to thank the partners of the EXPLORE2 project, which provided the data regarding the climate projections. Especially, the authors want to thank Eric Sauquet for his relevant comments which made this work achievable. Eventually, the authors want also express their gratitude to the Météo-France Meteorological Agency for providing the data used in this work from the SAFRAN database.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6083">This research has been supported by the Office Français de la Biodiversité  and the Ministère de l'Écologie, du Développement Durable et de l'Énergie (EXPLORE2 project).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6089">This paper was edited by Heng Dai and reviewed by six anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Baulenas et al.(2023)Baulenas, Versteeg, Terrado, Mindlin, and Bojovic</label><mixed-citation>Baulenas, E., Versteeg, G., Terrado, M., Mindlin, J., and Bojovic, D.: Assembling the climate story: use of storyline approaches in climate-related science, Global Challenges, 7, 2200183, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/gch2.202200183</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baulon et al.(2020)Baulon, Allier, Massei, Bessiere, Fournier, and Bault</label><mixed-citation>Baulon, L., Allier, D., Massei, N., Bessiere, H., Fournier, M., and Bault, V.: Influence de la variabilité basse-fréquence des niveaux piézométriques sur l'occurrence et l'amplitude des extrêmes, Géologues, Société Géologique de France <uri>https://hal.science/hal-03138860</uri> (last access: 13 October 2026),  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Baulon et al.(2022)Baulon, Massei, Allier, Fournier, and Bessiere</label><mixed-citation>Baulon, L., Massei, N., Allier, D., Fournier, M., and Bessiere, H.: Influence of low-frequency variability on high and low groundwater levels: example of aquifers in the Paris Basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2829–2854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Birnbaum and Tingey(1951)</label><mixed-citation>Birnbaum, Z. W. and Tingey, F. H.: One-Sided Confidence Contours for Probability Distribution Functions,  Ann. Math. Stat., 22, 592–596, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729550" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1214/aoms/1177729550</ext-link>,  1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bouttier and Marchal(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Bouttier, F. and Marchal, H.: Probabilistic short-range forecasts of high-precipitation events: optimal decision thresholds and predictability limits, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2793–2816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024</ext-link>,  2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boé et al.(2018)Boé, Radojevic, Bonnet, and Dayon</label><mixed-citation>Boé, J., Radojevic, M., Bonnet, R., and Dayon, G.: Scénarios sécheresse sur le bassin Seine-Normandie, Rapport technique, CECI, CERFACS-CNRS,, Toulouse, France, <uri>https://www.drieat.ile-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_boe_final.pdf</uri> (last access: 13 October 2026), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Carroget et al.(2017)Carroget, Perrin, Sauquet, Vidal, Chazot, Rouchy, and Chauveau</label><mixed-citation>Carroget, A., Perrin, C., Sauquet, E., Vidal, J.-P., Chazot, S., Rouchy, N., and Chauveau, M.: Explore 2070 : quelle utilisation d’un exercice prospectif sur les impacts des changements climatiques à l’échelle nationale pour définir des stratégies d’adaptation ?, Sciences Eaux &amp; Territoires, Numéro 22, 4–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3917/set.022.0004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3917/set.022.0004</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chauveau et al.(2013)Chauveau, Chazot, Perrin, Bourgin, Sauquet, Vidal, Rouchy, Martin, David, Norotte, Maugis, and De Lacaze</label><mixed-citation>Chauveau, M., Chazot, S., Perrin, C., Bourgin, P.-Y., Sauquet, E., Vidal, J.-P., Rouchy, N., Martin, E., David, J., Norotte, T., Maugis, P., and De Lacaze, X.: Quels impacts des changements climatiques sur les eaux de surface en France à l’horizon 2070 ?, La Houille Blanche, 99, 5–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2013027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/lhb/2013027</ext-link>,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Chery and Cattan(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Chery, L. and Cattan, A.: ADES : la banque de données nationale sur les eaux souterraines, La Houille Blanche, 89, 115–119, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2003038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/lhb/2003038</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Costantini et al.(2023)Costantini, Colin, and Decharme</label><mixed-citation>Costantini, M., Colin, J., and Decharme, B.: Projected Climate-Driven Changes of Water Table Depth in the World's Major Groundwater Basins, Earth's Future, 11, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022EF003068</ext-link>,  2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>David et al.(2011)David, Habets, Maidment, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>David, C. H., Habets, F., Maidment, D. R., and Yang, Z.-L.: RAPID applied to the SIM-France model, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3412–3425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.8070</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Dayon et al.(2018)Dayon, Boé, Martin, and Gailhard</label><mixed-citation>Dayon, G., Boé, J., Martin, E., and Gailhard, J.: Impacts of climate change on the hydrological cycle over France and associated uncertainties, Comptes Rendus, Géoscience, 350, 141–153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.crte.2018.03.001</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Decharme et al.(2019)Decharme, Delire, Minvielle, Colin, Vergnes, Alias, Saint-Martin, Séférian, Sénési, and Voldoire</label><mixed-citation>Decharme, B., Delire, C., Minvielle, M., Colin, J., Vergnes, J.-P., Alias, A., Saint-Martin, D., Séférian, R., Sénési, S., and Voldoire, A.: Recent Changes in the ISBA-CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM-CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off-Line Hydrological Applications, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 1207–1252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018MS001545</ext-link>,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Driouech et al.(2010)Driouech, Déqué, and Sánchez-Gómez</label><mixed-citation>Driouech, F., Déqué, M., and Sánchez-Gómez, E.: Weather regimes – Moroccan precipitation link in a regional climate change simulation, Glob. Planet. Change, 72, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Evin et al.(2019)Evin, Hingray, Blanchet, Eckert, Morin, and Verfaillie</label><mixed-citation>Evin, G., Hingray, B., Blanchet, J., Eckert, N., Morin, S., and Verfaillie, D.: Partitioning Uncertainty Components of an Incomplete Ensemble of Climate Projections Using Data Augmentation, J. Clim., 32, 2423–2440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0606.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0606.1</ext-link>,  2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Evin et al.(2024)Evin, Reverdy, and Hingray</label><mixed-citation>Evin, G., Reverdy, A., and Hingray, B.: Ensemble de projections Explore2 : changements moyens et incertitudes associés, Rapport final, IGE, INRAE, CNRS, Grenoble, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57745/KCOWZO" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57745/KCOWZO</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Evin et al.(2025)Evin, Hingray, Thirel, Ducharne, Strohmenger, Corre, Tramblay, Vidal, Bonneau, Colleoni, Gailhard, Habets, Hendrickx, Héraut, Huang, Le Lay, Magand, Marson, Monteil, Munier, Reverdy, Soubeyroux, Robin, Vergnes, Vrac, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>Evin, G., Hingray, B., Thirel, G., Ducharne, A., Strohmenger, L., Corre, L., Tramblay, Y., Vidal, J.-P., Bonneau, J., Colleoni, F., Gailhard, J., Habets, F., Hendrickx, F., Héraut, L., Huang, P., Le Lay, M., Magand, C., Marson, P., Monteil, C., Munier, S., Reverdy, A., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Robin, Y., Vergnes, J.-P., Vrac, M., and Sauquet, E.: Uncertainty sources in a large ensemble of hydrological projections: Regional Climate Models and Internal Variability matter, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Fereday et al.(2018)Fereday, Chadwick, Knight, and Scaife</label><mixed-citation>Fereday, D., Chadwick, R., Knight, J., and Scaife, A. A.: Atmospheric Dynamics is the Largest Source of Uncertainty in Future Winter European Rainfall, J. Clim., 31, 963–977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0048.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0048.1</ext-link>,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Garner et al.(2015)Garner, Van Loon, Prudhomme, and Hannah</label><mixed-citation>Garner, G., Van Loon, A. F., Prudhomme, C., and Hannah, D. M.: Hydroclimatology of extreme river flows, Freshwater Biol., 60, 2461–2476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/fwb.12667</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Goubanova and Li(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Goubanova, K. and Li, L.: Extremes in temperature and precipitation around the Mediterranean basin in an ensemble of future climate scenario simulations, Glob. Planet. Change, 57, 27–42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.012</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Guillaumot et al.(2022)Guillaumot, Smilovic, Burek, de Bruijn, Greve, Kahil, and Wada</label><mixed-citation>Guillaumot, L., Smilovic, M., Burek, P., de Bruijn, J., Greve, P., Kahil, T., and Wada, Y.: Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of irrigation at regional scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7099–7120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Guillaumot et al.(2024)Guillaumot, Munier, Abhervé, Vergnes, Jeantet, Le Moigne, and Habets</label><mixed-citation>Guillaumot, L., Munier, S., Abhervé, R., Vergnes, J.-P., Jeantet, A., Le Moigne, P., and Habets, F.: Are regional groundwater models suitable for simulating wetlands, rivers and intermittence? The example of the French AquiFR platform, J. Hydrol., 644, 132019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132019</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Habets et al.(2013)Habets, Boé, Déqué, Ducharne, Gascoin, Hachour, Martin, Pagé, Sauquet, Terray, Thiéry, Oudin, and Viennot</label><mixed-citation>Habets, F., Boé, J., Déqué, M., Ducharne, A., Gascoin, S., Hachour, A., Martin, E., Pagé, C., Sauquet, E., Terray, L., Thiéry, D., Oudin, L., and Viennot, P.: Impact of climate change on the hydrogeology of two basins in northern France, Climatic Change, 121, 771–785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0934-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-013-0934-x</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Habets et al.(2021)Habets, Amraoui, Thiéry, Vergnes, Morel, Le Moigne, Munier, Leroux, de Dreuzy, Longuevergne, Ackerer, Besson, Etchevers, Rousset, Willemet, Viennot, and Gallois</label><mixed-citation>Habets, F., Amraoui, N., Thiéry, D., Vergnes, J.-P., Morel, T., Le Moigne, P., Munier, S., Leroux, D., de Dreuzy, J.-R., Longuevergne, L., Ackerer, P., Besson, F., Etchevers, P., Rousset, F., Willemet, J.-M., Viennot, P., and Gallois, N.: Plateforme de modélisation hydrogéologique nationale AQUI-FR, Rapport final de 2ème phase, OFB, Paris, France, <uri>https://hal.science/hal-04006877</uri> (last access: 13 October 2026), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hawkins and Sutton(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1095–1108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1</ext-link>,  2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hingray and Saïd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Hingray, B. and Saïd, M.: Partitioning Internal Variability and Model Uncertainty Components in a Multimember Multimodel Ensemble of Climate Projections, J. Clim., 27, 6779–6798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Hingray et al.(2019)Hingray, Blanchet, Evin, and Vidal</label><mixed-citation>Hingray, B., Blanchet, J., Evin, G., and Vidal, J.-P.: Uncertainty component estimates in transient climate projections, Clim. Dynam., 53, 2501–2516, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04635-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-019-04635-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Højberg et al.(2013)Højberg, Troldborg, Stisen, Christensen, and Henriksen</label><mixed-citation>Højberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., Stisen, S., Christensen, B. B. S., and Henriksen, H. J.: Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model, Environ. Model. Softw., 40, 202–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.010</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>IPCC(2014)</label><mixed-citation> IPCC: Climate Change 2014 : Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Final Report, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ISBN 978-1-107-64165-5, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>IPCC(2022)</label><mixed-citation>IPCC: Climate Change 2022 : Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Final Report, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, publisher: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/9781009325844</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jacob et al.(2020)Jacob, Teichmann, Sobolowski, Katragkou, Anders, Belda, Benestad, Boberg, Buonomo, Cardoso, Casanueva, Christensen, Christensen, Coppola, De Cruz, Davin, Dobler, Domínguez, Fealy, Fernandez, Gaertner, García-Díez, Giorgi, Gobiet, Goergen, Gómez-Navarro, Alemán, Gutiérrez, Gutiérrez, Güttler, Haensler, Halenka, Jerez, Jiménez-Guerrero, Jones, Keuler, Kjellström, Knist, Kotlarski, Maraun, van Meijgaard, Mercogliano, Montávez, Navarra, Nikulin, de Noblet-Ducoudré, Panitz, Pfeifer, Piazza, Pichelli, Pietikäinen, Prein, Preuschmann, Rechid, Rockel, Romera, Sánchez, Sieck, Soares, Somot, Srnec, Sørland, Termonia, Truhetz, Vautard, Warrach-Sagi, and Wulfmeyer</label><mixed-citation>Jacob, D., Teichmann, C., Sobolowski, S., Katragkou, E., Anders, I., Belda, M., Benestad, R., Boberg, F., Buonomo, E., Cardoso, R. M., Casanueva, A., Christensen, O. B., Christensen, J. H., Coppola, E., De Cruz, L., Davin, E. L., Dobler, A., Domínguez, M., Fealy, R., Fernandez, J., Gaertner, M. A., García-Díez, M., Giorgi, F., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Gómez-Navarro, J. J., Alemán, J. J. G., Gutiérrez, C., Gutiérrez, J. M., Güttler, I., Haensler, A., Halenka, T., Jerez, S., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Jones, R. G., Keuler, K., Kjellström, E., Knist, S., Kotlarski, S., Maraun, D., van Meijgaard, E., Mercogliano, P., Montávez, J. P., Navarra, A., Nikulin, G., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Panitz, H.-J., Pfeifer, S., Piazza, M., Pichelli, E., Pietikäinen, J.-P., Prein, A. F., Preuschmann, S., Rechid, D., Rockel, B., Romera, R., Sánchez, E., Sieck, K., Soares, P. M. M., Somot, S., Srnec, L., Sørland, S. L., Termonia, P., Truhetz, H., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi, K., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate downscaling over Europe: perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community, Reg. Environ. Change, 20, 51, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01606-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10113-020-01606-9</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Jaouen et al.(2025)Jaouen, Benoit, Héraut, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>Jaouen, T., Benoit, L., Héraut, L., and Sauquet, E.: Will rivers become more intermittent in France? Learning from an extended set of hydrological projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3629–3671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3629-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-3629-2025</ext-link>,  2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Jeantet et al.(2023)Jeantet, Thirel, Lemaitre-Basset, and Tournebize</label><mixed-citation>Jeantet, A., Thirel, G., Lemaitre-Basset, T., and Tournebize, J.: Uncertainty propagation in a modelling chain of climate change impact for a representative French drainage site, Hydrol. Sci. J., 68, 1426–1442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2203322" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2023.2203322</ext-link>,  2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Kendall(1948)</label><mixed-citation> Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Methods, London (UK), charles griffin and co. edn., 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kennel et al.(2016)Kennel, Briggs, and Victor</label><mixed-citation>Kennel, C. F., Briggs, S., and Victor, D. G.: Making climate science more relevant, Science, 354, 421–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aag3248</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Knutti et al.(2013)Knutti, Masson, and Gettelman</label><mixed-citation>Knutti, R., Masson, D., and Gettelman, A.: Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 1194–1199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50256</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Kundzewicz et al.(2014)Kundzewicz, Kanae, Seneviratne, Handmer, Nicholls, Peduzzi, Mechler, Bouwer, Arnell, Mach, Muir-Wood, Brakenridge, Kron, Benito, Honda, Takahashi, and Sherstyukov</label><mixed-citation>Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., Muir-Wood, R., Brakenridge, G. R., Kron, W., Benito, G., Honda, Y., Takahashi, K., and Sherstyukov, B.: Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives, Hydrol. Sci. J., 59, 1–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2013.857411</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lafaysse et al.(2014)Lafaysse, Hingray, Mezghani, Gailhard, and Terray</label><mixed-citation>Lafaysse, M., Hingray, B., Mezghani, A., Gailhard, J., and Terray, L.: Internal variability and model uncertainty components in future hydrometeorological projections: The Alpine Durance basin, Water Resour. Res., 50, 3317–3341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014897" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013WR014897</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Lanini et al.(2024)Lanini, Robelin, Caballero, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>Lanini, S., Robelin, O., Caballero, Y., and Sauquet, E.: Projections hydrologiques souterraines : recharge potentielle des aquifères, Rapport final, BRGM, INRAE, Orléans, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57745/ZQPNIE" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57745/ZQPNIE</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2020)Le Moigne, Besson, Martin, Boé, Boone, Decharme, Etchevers, Faroux, Habets, Lafaysse, Leroux, and Rousset-Regimbeau</label><mixed-citation>Le Moigne, P., Besson, F., Martin, E., Boé, J., Boone, A., Decharme, B., Etchevers, P., Faroux, S., Habets, F., Lafaysse, M., Leroux, D., and Rousset-Regimbeau, F.: The latest improvements with SURFEX v8.0 of the Safran–Isba–Modcou hydrometeorological model for France, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3925–3946, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3925-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-3925-2020</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Ledoux et al.(1989)Ledoux, Girard, de Marsily, Villeneuve, and Deschenes</label><mixed-citation>Ledoux, E., Girard, G., de Marsily, G., Villeneuve, J. P., and Deschenes, J.: Spatially Distributed Modeling: Conceptual Approach, Coupling Surface Water And Groundwater, in: Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic Modeling: Theory and Practice, edited by: Morel-Seytoux, H. J., NATO ASI Series,  435–454, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-94-009-2352-2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2352-2_16" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-2352-2_16</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Lemaitre-Basset et al.(2021)Lemaitre-Basset, Collet, Thirel, Parajka, Evin, and Hingray</label><mixed-citation>Lemaitre-Basset, T., Collet, L., Thirel, G., Parajka, J., Evin, G., and Hingray, B.: Climate change impact and uncertainty analysis on hydrological extremes in a French Mediterranean catchment, Hydrol. Sci. J., 66, 888–903, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1895437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2021.1895437</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Liang et al.(2008)Liang, Kunkel, Meehl, Jones, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Liang, X.-Z., Kunkel, K. E., Meehl, G. A., Jones, R. G., and Wang, J. X. L.: Regional climate models downscaling analysis of general circulation models present climate biases propagation into future change projections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032849" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032849</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Mann(1945)</label><mixed-citation>Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric Tests Against Trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2307/1907187</ext-link>, 1945.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Marson et al.(2026)Marson, Soubeyroux, Corre, Samacoïts, Sauquet, Robin, and Vrac</label><mixed-citation>Marson, P., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Corre, L., Samacoïts, R., Sauquet, E., Robin, Y., and Vrac, M.: The Explore2 – 2022 climate projections dataset for impact studies over France, Data in Brief, 66, 112659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2026.112659" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dib.2026.112659</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Maréchal and Rouillard(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Maréchal, J.-C. and Rouillard, J.: Groundwater in France: Resources, Use and Management Issues, in: Sustainable Groundwater Management: A Comparative Analysis of French and Australian Policies and Implications to Other Countries, edited by Rinaudo, J.-D., Holley, C., Barnett, S., and Montginoul, M., Global Issues in Water Policy, 17–45, Springer International Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-32766-8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Masson et al.(2013)Masson, Le Moigne, Martin, Faroux, Alias, Alkama, Belamari, Barbu, Boone, Bouyssel, Brousseau, Brun, Calvet, Carrer, Decharme, Delire, Donier, Essaouini, Gibelin, Giordani, Habets, Jidane, Kerdraon, Kourzeneva, Lafaysse, Lafont, Lebeaupin Brossier, Lemonsu, Mahfouf, Marguinaud, Mokhtari, Morin, Pigeon, Salgado, Seity, Taillefer, Tanguy, Tulet, Vincendon, Vionnet, and Voldoire</label><mixed-citation>Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R., Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E., Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini, K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G., Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu, A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G., Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B., Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</ext-link>,  2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Maurer et al.(2010)Maurer, Hidalgo, Das, Dettinger, and Cayan</label><mixed-citation>Maurer, E. P., Hidalgo, H. G., Das, T., Dettinger, M. D., and Cayan, D. R.: The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1125–1138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Maxwell et al.(2015)Maxwell, Condon, and Kollet</label><mixed-citation>Maxwell, R. M., Condon, L. E., and Kollet, S. J.: A high-resolution simulation of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 923–937, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>McKee et al.(1993)McKee, Doesken, and Kleist</label><mixed-citation> McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales, Vol. 17, No. 22,  179–183, California, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 17–22 January 1993, Anaheim, California, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Meaurio et al.(2017)Meaurio, Zabaleta, Boithias, Epelde, Sauvage, Sánchez-Pérez, Srinivasan, and Antiguedad</label><mixed-citation>Meaurio, M., Zabaleta, A., Boithias, L., Epelde, A. M., Sauvage, S., Sánchez-Pérez, J.-M., Srinivasan, R., and Antiguedad, I.: Assessing the hydrological response from an ensemble of CMIP5 climate projections in the transition zone of the Atlantic region (Bay of Biscay), J. Hydrol., 548, 46–62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.029</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Meehl et al.(2007)Meehl, Covey, Delworth, Latif, McAvaney, Mitchell, Stouffer, and Taylor</label><mixed-citation>Meehl, G., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, J., Stouffer, R., and Taylor, K.: The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new era in climatic change research, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1383–1394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Michelangeli et al.(2009)Michelangeli, Vrac, and Loukos</label><mixed-citation>Michelangeli, P.-A., Vrac, M., and Loukos, H.: Probabilistic downscaling approaches: Application to wind cumulative distribution functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038401</ext-link>,  2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Munier and Decharme(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Munier, S. and Decharme, B.: River network and hydro-geomorphological parameters at 1/12-degree resolution for global hydrological and climate studies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2239–2258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2239-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-2239-2022</ext-link>,   2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Navarro-Racines et al.(2020)Navarro-Racines, Tarapues, Thornton, Jarvis, and Ramirez-Villegas</label><mixed-citation>Navarro-Racines, C., Tarapues, J., Thornton, P., Jarvis, A., and Ramirez-Villegas, J.: High-resolution and bias-corrected CMIP5 projections for climate change impact assessments, Sci. Data, 7, 7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Noilhan and Planton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 536–549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0536:ASPOLS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0536:ASPOLS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Northrop and Chandler(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Northrop, P. J. and Chandler, R. E.: Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in Projections of Future Climate, J. Clim., 27, 8793–8808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00265.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00265.1</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Nuissier et al.(2011)Nuissier, Joly, Joly, Ducrocq, and Arbogast</label><mixed-citation>Nuissier, O., Joly, B., Joly, A., Ducrocq, V., and Arbogast, P.: A statistical downscaling to identify the large-scale circulation patterns associated with heavy precipitation events over southern France, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 1812–1827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.866" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.866</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Pasquier(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Pasquier, J.-L.: Les prélèvements d’eau douce en France : les grands usages en 2013 et leur évolution depuis 20 ans, Rapport final, Ministère de l'environnement, de l'énergie et de la mer, en charge des relations internationales sur le climat, La Defense, France,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Pedregosa et al.(2011)Pedregosa, Varoquaux, Gramfort, Michel, Thirion, Grisel, Blondel, Prettenhofer, Weiss, Dubourg, Vanderplas, Passos, Cournapeau, Brucher, Perrot, and Duchesnay</label><mixed-citation> Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825–2830, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Philippe et al.(2011)Philippe, Habets, Ledoux, Goblet, Viennot, and Mary</label><mixed-citation>Philippe, E., Habets, F., Ledoux, E., Goblet, P., Viennot, P., and Mary, B.: Improvement of the solute transfer in a conceptual unsaturated zone scheme: a case study of the Seine River basin, Hydrol. Process., 25, 752–765, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7865</ext-link>,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Phillips(1956)</label><mixed-citation>Phillips, N. A.: The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 123–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708235202" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49708235202</ext-link>,  1956.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Potter et al.(2020)Potter, Chiew, Charles, Fu, Zheng, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Potter, N. J., Chiew, F. H. S., Charles, S. P., Fu, G., Zheng, H., and Zhang, L.: Bias in dynamically downscaled rainfall characteristics for hydroclimatic projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2963–2979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2963-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-2963-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Prudhomme et al.(2014)Prudhomme, Giuntoli, Robinson, Clark, Arnell, Dankers, Fekete, Franssen, Gerten, Gosling, Hagemann, Hannah, Kim, Masaki, Satoh, Stacke, Wada, and Wisser</label><mixed-citation>Prudhomme, C., Giuntoli, I., Robinson, E. L., Clark, D. B., Arnell, N. W., Dankers, R., Fekete, B. M., Franssen, W., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N., Hagemann, S., Hannah, D. M., Kim, H., Masaki, Y., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T., Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.: Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3262–3267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222473110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1222473110</ext-link>,  2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Rajib et al.(2014)Rajib, Sultana, Saha, and Rahman</label><mixed-citation>Rajib, M. A., Sultana, S., Saha, M., and Rahman, M. M.: A multi-model ensembling approach for developing plausible countryscale climate change scenarios for future, Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change, 5, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4172/2157-7617.1000179</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Randall(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Randall, D. A. (Ed.): General Circulation Model Development: Past, Present, and Future, Vol. 70, International Geophysics Series, Elsevier Science, San Diego CA, Academic press edn., ISBN 978-0-08-050723-1,  2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Riahi et al.(2011)Riahi, Rao, Krey, Cho, Chirkov, Fischer, Kindermann, Nakicenovic, and Rafaj</label><mixed-citation>Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., and Rafaj, P.: RCP8.5 – A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions, Climatic Change, 109, 33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Robin et al.(2023)Robin, Corre, Marson, Bernus, Vrac, and Thao</label><mixed-citation>Robin, Y., Corre, L., Marson, P., Bernus, S., Vrac, M., and Thao, S.: Explore 2 : Anticiper les évolutions climlatiques et hydrologiques en France. Projections Climatiques Régionalisées : Correction de Biais et Changements Futurs, Rapport final version 1.2, INRAE, OiEau, IPSL, Météo France, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57745/99X4CD" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57745/99X4CD</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Roehrig et al.(2020)Roehrig, Beau, Saint-Martin, Alias, Decharme, Guérémy, Voldoire, Abdel-Lathif, Bazile, Belamari, Blein, Bouniol, Bouteloup, Cattiaux, Chauvin, Chevallier, Colin, Douville, Marquet, Michou, Nabat, Oudar, Peyrillé, Piriou, Salas y Mélia, Séférian, and Sénési</label><mixed-citation>Roehrig, R., Beau, I., Saint-Martin, D., Alias, A., Decharme, B., Guérémy, J.-F., Voldoire, A., Abdel-Lathif, A. Y., Bazile, E., Belamari, S., Blein, S., Bouniol, D., Bouteloup, Y., Cattiaux, J., Chauvin, F., Chevallier, M., Colin, J., Douville, H., Marquet, P., Michou, M., Nabat, P., Oudar, T., Peyrillé, P., Piriou, J.-M., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., and Sénési, S.: The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE-Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 12, e2020MS002075, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002075" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002075</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Saleh et al.(2013)Saleh, Ducharne, Flipo, Oudin, and Ledoux</label><mixed-citation>Saleh, F., Ducharne, A., Flipo, N., Oudin, L., and Ledoux, E.: Impact of river bed morphology on discharge and water levels simulated by a 1D Saint–Venant hydraulic model at regional scale, J. Hydrol., 476, 169–177, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.027</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Sansom et al.(2013)Sansom, Stephenson, Ferro, Zappa, and Shaffrey</label><mixed-citation>Sansom, P. G., Stephenson, D. B., Ferro, C. A. T., Zappa, G., and Shaffrey, L.: Simple Uncertainty Frameworks for Selecting Weighting Schemes and Interpreting Multimodel Ensemble Climate Change Experiments, J. Clim., 26, 4017–4037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00462.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00462.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Sauquet et al.(2024)Sauquet, Strohmenger, Thirel, and Le Lay</label><mixed-citation>Sauquet, E., Strohmenger, L., Thirel, G., and Le Lay, M.: Quelles évolutions des régimes hydrologiques en France métropolitaine ?, Rapport final, INRAE, EDF, Lyon, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57745/TLUTKF" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57745/TLUTKF</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Sauquet et al.(2026)Sauquet, Evin, Siauve, Aissat, Arnaud, Bérel, Bonneau, Branger, Caballero, Colléoni, Ducharne, Gailhard, Habets, Hendrickx, Héraut, Hingray, Huang, Jaouen, Jeantet, Lanini, Le Lay, Magand, Mimeau, Monteil, Munier, Perrin, Robelin, Rousset, Soubeyroux, Strohmenger, Thirel, Tocquer, Tramblay, Vergnes, and Vidal</label><mixed-citation>Sauquet, E., Evin, G., Siauve, S., Aissat, R., Arnaud, P., Bérel, M., Bonneau, J., Branger, F., Caballero, Y., Colléoni, F., Ducharne, A., Gailhard, J., Habets, F., Hendrickx, F., Héraut, L., Hingray, B., Huang, P., Jaouen, T., Jeantet, A., Lanini, S., Le Lay, M., Magand, C., Mimeau, L., Monteil, C., Munier, S., Perrin, C., Robelin, O., Rousset, F., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Strohmenger, L., Thirel, G., Tocquer, F., Tramblay, Y., Vergnes, J.-P., and Vidal, J.-P.: A large transient multi-scenario multi-model ensemble of future streamflow and groundwater projections in France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2277–2300, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2277-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-30-2277-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Seguin(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Seguin, J.-J.: Proposition d’un indicateur piézométrique standardisé pour le Bulletin de Situation Hydrologique “Nappes”, Rapport finale BRGM/RP-64147-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Shepherd(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Shepherd, T. G.: Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information, P. Roy. Soc. A, 475, 20190013, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2019.0013</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Shepherd et al.(2018)Shepherd, Boyd, Calel, Chapman, Dessai, Dima-West, Fowler, James, Maraun, Martius, Senior, Sobel, Stainforth, Tett, Trenberth, van den Hurk, Watkins, Wilby, and Zenghelis</label><mixed-citation>Shepherd, T. G., Boyd, E., Calel, R. A., Chapman, S. C., Dessai, S., Dima-West, I. M., Fowler, H. J., James, R., Maraun, D., Martius, O., Senior, C. A., Sobel, A. H., Stainforth, D. A., Tett, S. F. B., Trenberth, K. E., van den Hurk, B. J. J. M., Watkins, N. W., Wilby, R. L., and Zenghelis, D. A.: Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change, Climatic Change, 151, 555–571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Sobaga et al.(2024)Sobaga, Habets, Beaudoin, Léonard, and Decharme</label><mixed-citation>Sobaga, A., Habets, F., Beaudoin, N., Léonard, J., and Decharme, B.: Decreasing trend of groundwater recharge with limited impact of intense precipitation: Evidence from long-term lysimeter data, J. Hydrol., 637, 131340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131340" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131340</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Soubeyroux et al.(2021)Soubeyroux, Bernus, Corre, Drouin, Dubuisson, Etchevers, Gouget, Josse, Kerdoncuff, Samacoits, and Tocquet</label><mixed-citation> Soubeyroux, J.-M., Bernus, S., Corre, L., Drouin, A., Dubuisson, B., Etchevers, P., Gouget, V., Josse, P., Kerdoncuff, M., Samacoits, R., and Tocquet, F.: Les nouvelles projections climatiques de référence DRIAS 2020 pour la métropole, Rapport technique, Météo-France, Toulouse,  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Stollsteiner(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Stollsteiner, P.: Projet Explore 2070 : Evaluation de l'impact du changement climatique, Rapport finale BRGM/RP-61483-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Tapiador et al.(2020)Tapiador, Navarro, Moreno, Sánchez, and García-Ortega</label><mixed-citation>Tapiador, F. J., Navarro, A., Moreno, R., Sánchez, J. L., and García-Ortega, E.: Regional climate models: 30 years of dynamical downscaling, Atmos. Res., 235, 104785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104785</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Taylor et al.(2012)Taylor, Stouffer, and Meehl</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1</ext-link>,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Thiéry(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Thiéry, D.: Code de calcul MARTHE – Modélisation 3D des écoulements dans les hydrosystèmes – Notice d’utilisation de la version 7.5, Rapport finale BRGM/RP-64554-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Thomson et al.(2011)Thomson, Calvin, Smith, Kyle, Volke, Patel, Delgado-Arias, Bond-Lamberty, Wise, Clarke, and Edmonds</label><mixed-citation>Thomson, A. M., Calvin, K. V., Smith, S. J., Kyle, G. P., Volke, A., Patel, P., Delgado-Arias, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Wise, M. A., Clarke, L. E., and Edmonds, J. A.: RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100, Climatic Change, 109, 77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Tramblay and Somot(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Tramblay, Y. and Somot, S.: Future evolution of extreme precipitation in the Mediterranean, Climatic Change, 151, 289–302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2300-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-018-2300-5</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Tramblay et al.(2024)Tramblay, Sauquet, Arnaud, Rousset, Soubeyroux, Jeantet, Munier, and Vergnes</label><mixed-citation>Tramblay, Y., Sauquet, E., Arnaud, P., Rousset, F., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Jeantet, A., Munier, S., and Vergnes, J.-P.: Scénarios d'extrêmes hydrologiques, Rapport final, IRD, INRAE, Météo-France, CNRM, BRGM, Montpellier, France, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.57745/2XDJ5H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.57745/2XDJ5H</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Tramblay et al.(2025)Tramblay, Thirel, Strohmenger, Evin, Corre, Heraut, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>Tramblay, Y., Thirel, G., Strohmenger, L., Evin, G., Corre, L., Heraut, L., and Sauquet, E.: Evolution of flood generating processes under climate change in France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 7023–7039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7023-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-29-7023-2025</ext-link>,  2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Van Loon(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought explained, WIREs Water, 2, 359–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wat2.1085</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>van Vuuren et al.(2007)van Vuuren, den Elzen, Lucas, Eickhout, Strengers, van Ruijven, Wonink, and van Houdt</label><mixed-citation>van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, M. G. J., Lucas, P. L., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B. J., van Ruijven, B., Wonink, S., and van Houdt, R.: Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs, Climatic Change, 81, 119–159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Verfaillie et al.(2017)Verfaillie, Déqué, Morin, and Lafaysse</label><mixed-citation>Verfaillie, D., Déqué, M., Morin, S., and Lafaysse, M.: The method ADAMONT v1.0 for statistical adjustment of climate projections applicable to energy balance land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4257–4283, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4257-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-4257-2017</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Vergnes et al.(2020)Vergnes, Roux, Habets, Ackerer, Amraoui, Besson, Caballero, Courtois, de Dreuzy, Etchevers, Gallois, Leroux, Longuevergne, Le Moigne, Morel, Munier, Regimbeau, Thiéry, and Viennot</label><mixed-citation>Vergnes, J.-P., Roux, N., Habets, F., Ackerer, P., Amraoui, N., Besson, F., Caballero, Y., Courtois, Q., de Dreuzy, J.-R., Etchevers, P., Gallois, N., Leroux, D. J., Longuevergne, L., Le Moigne, P., Morel, T., Munier, S., Regimbeau, F., Thiéry, D., and Viennot, P.: The AquiFR hydrometeorological modelling platform as a tool for improving groundwater resource monitoring over France: evaluation over a 60-year period, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 633–654, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-633-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-633-2020</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Vergnes et al.(2023)Vergnes, Caballero, and Lanini</label><mixed-citation>Vergnes, J.-P., Caballero, Y., and Lanini, S.: Assessing climate change impact on French groundwater resources using a spatially distributed hydrogeological model, Hydrol. Sci. J., 68, 209–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2150553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2022.2150553</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Vetter et al.(2015)Vetter, Huang, Aich, Yang, Wang, Krysanova, and Hattermann</label><mixed-citation>Vetter, T., Huang, S., Aich, V., Yang, T., Wang, X., Krysanova, V., and Hattermann, F.: Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for three large-scale river basins on three continents, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6, 17–43, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-17-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-6-17-2015</ext-link>,  2015. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Vidal et al.(2010)Vidal, Martin, Franchistéguy, Baillon, and Soubeyroux</label><mixed-citation>Vidal, J.-P., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., and Soubeyroux, J.-M.: A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1627–1644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.2003</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Vidal et al.(2016)Vidal, Hingray, Magand, Sauquet, and Ducharne</label><mixed-citation>Vidal, J.-P., Hingray, B., Magand, C., Sauquet, E., and Ducharne, A.: Hierarchy of climate and hydrological uncertainties in transient low-flow projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3651–3672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Climate change impacts on groundwater simulated using the AquiFR modelling platform</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Baulenas et al.(2023)Baulenas, Versteeg, Terrado, Mindlin, and
Bojovic</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baulenas, E., Versteeg, G., Terrado, M., Mindlin, J., and Bojovic, D.:
Assembling the climate story: use of storyline approaches in climate-related
science, Global Challenges, 7, 2200183, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200183</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baulon et al.(2020)Baulon, Allier, Massei, Bessiere, Fournier, and
Bault</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baulon, L., Allier, D., Massei, N., Bessiere, H., Fournier, M., and Bault, V.:
Influence de la variabilité basse-fréquence des niveaux piézométriques
sur l'occurrence et l'amplitude des extrêmes, Géologues, Société
Géologique de France
<a href="https://hal.science/hal-03138860" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 October 2026),  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baulon et al.(2022)Baulon, Massei, Allier, Fournier, and
Bessiere</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baulon, L., Massei, N., Allier, D., Fournier, M., and Bessiere, H.: Influence
of low-frequency variability on high and low groundwater levels: example of
aquifers in the Paris Basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26,
2829–2854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2829-2022</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Birnbaum and Tingey(1951)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Birnbaum, Z. W. and Tingey, F. H.: One-Sided Confidence Contours for
Probability Distribution Functions,  Ann. Math.
Stat., 22, 592–596, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729550" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729550</a>,  1951.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bouttier and Marchal(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouttier, F. and Marchal, H.: Probabilistic short-range forecasts of
high-precipitation events: optimal decision thresholds and predictability
limits, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2793–2816,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024</a>,  2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boé et al.(2018)Boé, Radojevic, Bonnet, and
Dayon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boé, J., Radojevic, M., Bonnet, R., and Dayon, G.: Scénarios sécheresse sur
le bassin Seine-Normandie, Rapport technique, CECI, CERFACS-CNRS,,
Toulouse, France,
<a href="https://www.drieat.ile-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_boe_final.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 October 2026),
2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Carroget et al.(2017)Carroget, Perrin, Sauquet, Vidal, Chazot,
Rouchy, and Chauveau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carroget, A., Perrin, C., Sauquet, E., Vidal, J.-P., Chazot, S., Rouchy, N.,
and Chauveau, M.: Explore 2070 : quelle utilisation d’un exercice
prospectif sur les impacts des changements climatiques à l’échelle
nationale pour définir des stratégies d’adaptation ?, Sciences Eaux &amp;
Territoires, Numéro 22, 4–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3917/set.022.0004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3917/set.022.0004</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chauveau et al.(2013)Chauveau, Chazot, Perrin, Bourgin, Sauquet,
Vidal, Rouchy, Martin, David, Norotte, Maugis, and
De Lacaze</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chauveau, M., Chazot, S., Perrin, C., Bourgin, P.-Y., Sauquet, E., Vidal,
J.-P., Rouchy, N., Martin, E., David, J., Norotte, T., Maugis, P., and
De Lacaze, X.: Quels impacts des changements climatiques sur les eaux de
surface en France à l’horizon 2070 ?, La Houille Blanche, 99, 5–15,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2013027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2013027</a>,  2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Chery and Cattan(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chery, L. and Cattan, A.: ADES : la banque de données nationale sur les eaux
souterraines, La Houille Blanche, 89, 115–119, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2003038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2003038</a>,
2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Costantini et al.(2023)Costantini, Colin, and
Decharme</label><mixed-citation>
      
Costantini, M., Colin, J., and Decharme, B.: Projected Climate-Driven
Changes of Water Table Depth in the World's Major Groundwater
Basins, Earth's Future, 11, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003068</a>,  2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>David et al.(2011)David, Habets, Maidment, and
Yang</label><mixed-citation>
      
David, C. H., Habets, F., Maidment, D. R., and Yang, Z.-L.: RAPID applied to
the SIM-France model, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3412–3425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Dayon et al.(2018)Dayon, Boé, Martin, and
Gailhard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dayon, G., Boé, J., Martin, E., and Gailhard, J.: Impacts of climate change on
the hydrological cycle over France and associated uncertainties, Comptes
Rendus, Géoscience, 350, 141–153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2018.03.001</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Decharme et al.(2019)Decharme, Delire, Minvielle, Colin, Vergnes,
Alias, Saint-Martin, Séférian, Sénési, and
Voldoire</label><mixed-citation>
      
Decharme, B., Delire, C., Minvielle, M., Colin, J., Vergnes, J.-P., Alias, A.,
Saint-Martin, D., Séférian, R., Sénési, S., and Voldoire, A.: Recent
Changes in the ISBA-CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the
CNRM-CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off-Line Hydrological
Applications, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11,
1207–1252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001545</a>,  2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Driouech et al.(2010)Driouech, Déqué, and
Sánchez-Gómez</label><mixed-citation>
      
Driouech, F., Déqué, M., and Sánchez-Gómez, E.: Weather
regimes – Moroccan precipitation link in a regional climate change
simulation, Glob. Planet. Change, 72, 1–10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.03.004</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Evin et al.(2019)Evin, Hingray, Blanchet, Eckert, Morin, and
Verfaillie</label><mixed-citation>
      
Evin, G., Hingray, B., Blanchet, J., Eckert, N., Morin, S., and Verfaillie, D.:
Partitioning Uncertainty Components of an Incomplete Ensemble of
Climate Projections Using Data Augmentation, J. Clim.,
32, 2423–2440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0606.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0606.1</a>,  2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Evin et al.(2024)Evin, Reverdy, and Hingray</label><mixed-citation>
      
Evin, G., Reverdy, A., and Hingray, B.: Ensemble de projections Explore2 :
changements moyens et incertitudes associés, Rapport final, IGE, INRAE,
CNRS, Grenoble, France, <a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/KCOWZO" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57745/KCOWZO</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Evin et al.(2025)Evin, Hingray, Thirel, Ducharne, Strohmenger, Corre,
Tramblay, Vidal, Bonneau, Colleoni, Gailhard, Habets, Hendrickx, Héraut,
Huang, Le Lay, Magand, Marson, Monteil, Munier, Reverdy, Soubeyroux, Robin,
Vergnes, Vrac, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Evin, G., Hingray, B., Thirel, G., Ducharne, A., Strohmenger, L., Corre, L., Tramblay, Y., Vidal, J.-P., Bonneau, J., Colleoni, F., Gailhard, J., Habets, F., Hendrickx, F., Héraut, L., Huang, P., Le Lay, M., Magand, C., Marson, P., Monteil, C., Munier, S., Reverdy, A., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Robin, Y., Vergnes, J.-P., Vrac, M., and Sauquet, E.: Uncertainty sources in a large ensemble of hydrological projections: Regional Climate Models and Internal Variability matter, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fereday et al.(2018)Fereday, Chadwick, Knight, and
Scaife</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fereday, D., Chadwick, R., Knight, J., and Scaife, A. A.: Atmospheric
Dynamics is the Largest Source of Uncertainty in Future Winter
European Rainfall, J. Clim., 31, 963–977,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0048.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0048.1</a>,  2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Garner et al.(2015)Garner, Van Loon, Prudhomme, and
Hannah</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garner, G., Van Loon, A. F., Prudhomme, C., and Hannah, D. M.: Hydroclimatology
of extreme river flows, Freshwater Biol., 60, 2461–2476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12667" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12667</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Goubanova and Li(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goubanova, K. and Li, L.: Extremes in temperature and precipitation around the
Mediterranean basin in an ensemble of future climate scenario simulations,
Glob. Planet. Change, 57, 27–42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.012</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Guillaumot et al.(2022)Guillaumot, Smilovic, Burek, de Bruijn, Greve,
Kahil, and Wada</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guillaumot, L., Smilovic, M., Burek, P., de Bruijn, J., Greve, P., Kahil, T.,
and Wada, Y.: Coupling a large-scale hydrological model (CWatM v1.1) with a
high-resolution groundwater flow model (MODFLOW 6) to assess the impact of
irrigation at regional scale, Geosci. Model Dev., 15,
7099–7120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7099-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Guillaumot et al.(2024)Guillaumot, Munier, Abhervé, Vergnes,
Jeantet, Le Moigne, and Habets</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guillaumot, L., Munier, S., Abhervé, R., Vergnes, J.-P., Jeantet, A.,
Le Moigne, P., and Habets, F.: Are regional groundwater models suitable for
simulating wetlands, rivers and intermittence? The example of the French
AquiFR platform, J. Hydrol., 644, 132019,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132019</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Habets et al.(2013)Habets, Boé, Déqué, Ducharne, Gascoin, Hachour,
Martin, Pagé, Sauquet, Terray, Thiéry, Oudin, and
Viennot</label><mixed-citation>
      
Habets, F., Boé, J., Déqué, M., Ducharne, A., Gascoin, S., Hachour, A.,
Martin, E., Pagé, C., Sauquet, E., Terray, L., Thiéry, D., Oudin, L., and
Viennot, P.: Impact of climate change on the hydrogeology of two basins in
northern France, Climatic Change, 121, 771–785,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0934-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0934-x</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Habets et al.(2021)Habets, Amraoui, Thiéry, Vergnes, Morel,
Le Moigne, Munier, Leroux, de Dreuzy, Longuevergne, Ackerer, Besson,
Etchevers, Rousset, Willemet, Viennot, and Gallois</label><mixed-citation>
      
Habets, F., Amraoui, N., Thiéry, D., Vergnes, J.-P., Morel, T., Le Moigne, P.,
Munier, S., Leroux, D., de Dreuzy, J.-R., Longuevergne, L., Ackerer, P.,
Besson, F., Etchevers, P., Rousset, F., Willemet, J.-M., Viennot, P., and
Gallois, N.: Plateforme de modélisation hydrogéologique nationale
AQUI-FR, Rapport final de 2ème phase, OFB, Paris, France,
<a href="https://hal.science/hal-04006877" target="_blank"/> (last access: 13 October 2026), 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hawkins and Sutton(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in
Regional Climate Predictions, Bull. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 90, 1095–1108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1</a>,  2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hingray and Saïd(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hingray, B. and Saïd, M.: Partitioning Internal Variability and Model
Uncertainty Components in a Multimember Multimodel Ensemble of
Climate Projections, J. Clim., 27, 6779–6798,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00629.1</a>,  2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hingray et al.(2019)Hingray, Blanchet, Evin, and
Vidal</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hingray, B., Blanchet, J., Evin, G., and Vidal, J.-P.: Uncertainty component
estimates in transient climate projections, Clim. Dynam., 53, 2501–2516,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04635-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04635-1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Højberg et al.(2013)Højberg, Troldborg, Stisen, Christensen, and
Henriksen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Højberg, A. L., Troldborg, L., Stisen, S., Christensen, B. B. S., and
Henriksen, H. J.: Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national
water resources model, Environ. Model. Softw., 40, 202–213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.010</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>IPCC(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
IPCC: Climate Change 2014 : Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.
Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working
Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Final Report, Cambridge University Pres,
Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ISBN 978-1-107-64165-5, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>IPCC(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
IPCC: Climate Change 2022 : Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability:
Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Final Report,
Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
publisher: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jacob et al.(2020)Jacob, Teichmann, Sobolowski, Katragkou, Anders,
Belda, Benestad, Boberg, Buonomo, Cardoso, Casanueva, Christensen,
Christensen, Coppola, De Cruz, Davin, Dobler, Domínguez, Fealy, Fernandez,
Gaertner, García-Díez, Giorgi, Gobiet, Goergen, Gómez-Navarro, Alemán,
Gutiérrez, Gutiérrez, Güttler, Haensler, Halenka, Jerez,
Jiménez-Guerrero, Jones, Keuler, Kjellström, Knist, Kotlarski, Maraun, van
Meijgaard, Mercogliano, Montávez, Navarra, Nikulin, de Noblet-Ducoudré,
Panitz, Pfeifer, Piazza, Pichelli, Pietikäinen, Prein, Preuschmann, Rechid,
Rockel, Romera, Sánchez, Sieck, Soares, Somot, Srnec, Sørland, Termonia,
Truhetz, Vautard, Warrach-Sagi, and Wulfmeyer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jacob, D., Teichmann, C., Sobolowski, S., Katragkou, E., Anders, I., Belda, M.,
Benestad, R., Boberg, F., Buonomo, E., Cardoso, R. M., Casanueva, A.,
Christensen, O. B., Christensen, J. H., Coppola, E., De Cruz, L., Davin,
E. L., Dobler, A., Domínguez, M., Fealy, R., Fernandez, J., Gaertner, M. A.,
García-Díez, M., Giorgi, F., Gobiet, A., Goergen, K., Gómez-Navarro,
J. J., Alemán, J. J. G., Gutiérrez, C., Gutiérrez, J. M., Güttler, I.,
Haensler, A., Halenka, T., Jerez, S., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Jones, R. G.,
Keuler, K., Kjellström, E., Knist, S., Kotlarski, S., Maraun, D., van
Meijgaard, E., Mercogliano, P., Montávez, J. P., Navarra, A., Nikulin, G.,
de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Panitz, H.-J., Pfeifer, S., Piazza, M., Pichelli,
E., Pietikäinen, J.-P., Prein, A. F., Preuschmann, S., Rechid, D., Rockel,
B., Romera, R., Sánchez, E., Sieck, K., Soares, P. M. M., Somot, S., Srnec,
L., Sørland, S. L., Termonia, P., Truhetz, H., Vautard, R., Warrach-Sagi,
K., and Wulfmeyer, V.: Regional climate downscaling over Europe:
perspectives from the EURO-CORDEX community, Reg. Environ.
Change, 20, 51, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01606-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01606-9</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Jaouen et al.(2025)Jaouen, Benoit, Héraut, and
Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jaouen, T., Benoit, L., Héraut, L., and Sauquet, E.: Will rivers become more
intermittent in France? Learning from an extended set of hydrological
projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3629–3671,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3629-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3629-2025</a>,  2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Jeantet et al.(2023)Jeantet, Thirel, Lemaitre-Basset, and
Tournebize</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jeantet, A., Thirel, G., Lemaitre-Basset, T., and Tournebize, J.: Uncertainty
propagation in a modelling chain of climate change impact for a
representative French drainage site, Hydrol. Sci. J., 68,
1426–1442, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2203322" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2203322</a>,  2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Kendall(1948)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Methods, London (UK), charles griffin and
co. edn., 1948.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kennel et al.(2016)Kennel, Briggs, and Victor</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kennel, C. F., Briggs, S., and Victor, D. G.: Making climate science more
relevant, Science, 354, 421–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag3248</a>,  2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Knutti et al.(2013)Knutti, Masson, and
Gettelman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Knutti, R., Masson, D., and Gettelman, A.: Climate model genealogy:
Generation CMIP5 and how we got there, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40,
1194–1199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50256</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Kundzewicz et al.(2014)Kundzewicz, Kanae, Seneviratne, Handmer,
Nicholls, Peduzzi, Mechler, Bouwer, Arnell, Mach, Muir-Wood, Brakenridge,
Kron, Benito, Honda, Takahashi, and Sherstyukov</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N.,
Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., Muir-Wood, R.,
Brakenridge, G. R., Kron, W., Benito, G., Honda, Y., Takahashi, K., and
Sherstyukov, B.: Flood risk and climate change: global and regional
perspectives, Hydrol. Sci. J., 59, 1–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lafaysse et al.(2014)Lafaysse, Hingray, Mezghani, Gailhard, and
Terray</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lafaysse, M., Hingray, B., Mezghani, A., Gailhard, J., and Terray, L.: Internal
variability and model uncertainty components in future hydrometeorological
projections: The Alpine Durance basin, Water Resour. Res., 50,
3317–3341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014897" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014897</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Lanini et al.(2024)Lanini, Robelin, Caballero, and
Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lanini, S., Robelin, O., Caballero, Y., and Sauquet, E.: Projections
hydrologiques souterraines : recharge potentielle des aquifères, Rapport
final, BRGM, INRAE, Orléans, France,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/ZQPNIE" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57745/ZQPNIE</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Le Moigne et al.(2020)Le Moigne, Besson, Martin, Boé, Boone,
Decharme, Etchevers, Faroux, Habets, Lafaysse, Leroux, and
Rousset-Regimbeau</label><mixed-citation>
      
Le Moigne, P., Besson, F., Martin, E., Boé, J., Boone, A., Decharme, B.,
Etchevers, P., Faroux, S., Habets, F., Lafaysse, M., Leroux, D., and
Rousset-Regimbeau, F.: The latest improvements with SURFEX v8.0 of the
Safran–Isba–Modcou hydrometeorological model for France,
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3925–3946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3925-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3925-2020</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Ledoux et al.(1989)Ledoux, Girard, de Marsily, Villeneuve, and
Deschenes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ledoux, E., Girard, G., de Marsily, G., Villeneuve, J. P., and Deschenes, J.:
Spatially Distributed Modeling: Conceptual Approach, Coupling
Surface Water And Groundwater, in: Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic
Modeling: Theory and Practice, edited by: Morel-Seytoux, H. J., NATO
ASI Series,  435–454, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, ISBN
978-94-009-2352-2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2352-2_16" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2352-2_16</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Lemaitre-Basset et al.(2021)Lemaitre-Basset, Collet, Thirel, Parajka,
Evin, and Hingray</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lemaitre-Basset, T., Collet, L., Thirel, G., Parajka, J., Evin, G., and
Hingray, B.: Climate change impact and uncertainty analysis on hydrological
extremes in a French Mediterranean catchment, Hydrol. Sci.
J., 66, 888–903, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1895437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1895437</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Liang et al.(2008)Liang, Kunkel, Meehl, Jones, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liang, X.-Z., Kunkel, K. E., Meehl, G. A., Jones, R. G., and Wang, J. X. L.:
Regional climate models downscaling analysis of general circulation models
present climate biases propagation into future change projections,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032849" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032849</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Mann(1945)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mann, H. B.: Nonparametric Tests Against Trend, Econometrica, 13,
245–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187</a>,
1945.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Marson et al.(2026)Marson, Soubeyroux, Corre, Samacoïts, Sauquet,
Robin, and Vrac</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marson, P., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Corre, L., Samacoïts, R., Sauquet, E., Robin,
Y., and Vrac, M.: The Explore2 – 2022 climate projections dataset for
impact studies over France, Data in Brief, 66, 112659,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2026.112659" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2026.112659</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Maréchal and Rouillard(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maréchal, J.-C. and Rouillard, J.: Groundwater in France: Resources, Use
and Management Issues, in: Sustainable Groundwater Management: A
Comparative Analysis of French and Australian Policies and
Implications to Other Countries, edited by Rinaudo, J.-D., Holley, C.,
Barnett, S., and Montginoul, M., Global Issues in Water Policy,
17–45, Springer International Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-32766-8,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Masson et al.(2013)Masson, Le Moigne, Martin, Faroux, Alias, Alkama,
Belamari, Barbu, Boone, Bouyssel, Brousseau, Brun, Calvet, Carrer, Decharme,
Delire, Donier, Essaouini, Gibelin, Giordani, Habets, Jidane, Kerdraon,
Kourzeneva, Lafaysse, Lafont, Lebeaupin Brossier, Lemonsu, Mahfouf,
Marguinaud, Mokhtari, Morin, Pigeon, Salgado, Seity, Taillefer, Tanguy,
Tulet, Vincendon, Vionnet, and Voldoire</label><mixed-citation>
      
Masson, V., Le Moigne, P., Martin, E., Faroux, S., Alias, A., Alkama, R.,
Belamari, S., Barbu, A., Boone, A., Bouyssel, F., Brousseau, P., Brun, E.,
Calvet, J.-C., Carrer, D., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Donier, S., Essaouini,
K., Gibelin, A.-L., Giordani, H., Habets, F., Jidane, M., Kerdraon, G.,
Kourzeneva, E., Lafaysse, M., Lafont, S., Lebeaupin Brossier, C., Lemonsu,
A., Mahfouf, J.-F., Marguinaud, P., Mokhtari, M., Morin, S., Pigeon, G.,
Salgado, R., Seity, Y., Taillefer, F., Tanguy, G., Tulet, P., Vincendon, B.,
Vionnet, V., and Voldoire, A.: The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface
platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and
fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 929–960,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-929-2013</a>,  2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Maurer et al.(2010)Maurer, Hidalgo, Das, Dettinger, and
Cayan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maurer, E. P., Hidalgo, H. G., Das, T., Dettinger, M. D., and Cayan, D. R.: The
utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change
impacts on daily streamflow in California, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 14, 1125–1138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Maxwell et al.(2015)Maxwell, Condon, and
Kollet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maxwell, R. M., Condon, L. E., and Kollet, S. J.: A high-resolution simulation
of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the
integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3, Geosci. Model Dev., 8,
923–937, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015</a>,  2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>McKee et al.(1993)McKee, Doesken, and
Kleist</label><mixed-citation>
      
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: The relationship of drought
frequency and duration to time scales, Vol. 17, No. 22,  179–183,
California, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 17–22 January 1993,
Anaheim, California, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Meaurio et al.(2017)Meaurio, Zabaleta, Boithias, Epelde, Sauvage,
Sánchez-Pérez, Srinivasan, and Antiguedad</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meaurio, M., Zabaleta, A., Boithias, L., Epelde, A. M., Sauvage, S.,
Sánchez-Pérez, J.-M., Srinivasan, R., and Antiguedad, I.: Assessing the
hydrological response from an ensemble of CMIP5 climate projections in the
transition zone of the Atlantic region (Bay of Biscay), J.
Hydrol., 548, 46–62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.029</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Meehl et al.(2007)Meehl, Covey, Delworth, Latif, McAvaney, Mitchell,
Stouffer, and Taylor</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meehl, G., Covey, C., Delworth, T., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., Mitchell, J.,
Stouffer, R., and Taylor, K.: The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: A new
era in climatic change research, Bull. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 88, 1383–1394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Michelangeli et al.(2009)Michelangeli, Vrac, and
Loukos</label><mixed-citation>
      
Michelangeli, P.-A., Vrac, M., and Loukos, H.: Probabilistic downscaling
approaches: Application to wind cumulative distribution functions,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038401</a>,  2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Munier and Decharme(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Munier, S. and Decharme, B.: River network and hydro-geomorphological
parameters at 1/12-degree resolution for global hydrological
and climate studies, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 2239–2258,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2239-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2239-2022</a>,   2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Navarro-Racines et al.(2020)Navarro-Racines, Tarapues, Thornton,
Jarvis, and Ramirez-Villegas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navarro-Racines, C., Tarapues, J., Thornton, P., Jarvis, A., and
Ramirez-Villegas, J.: High-resolution and bias-corrected CMIP5 projections
for climate change impact assessments, Sci. Data, 7, 7,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0343-8</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Noilhan and Planton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noilhan, J. and Planton, S.: A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface
Processes for Meteorological Models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117,
536–549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0536:ASPOLS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117&lt;0536:ASPOLS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Northrop and Chandler(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Northrop, P. J. and Chandler, R. E.: Quantifying Sources of Uncertainty in
Projections of Future Climate, J. Clim., 27, 8793–8808,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00265.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00265.1</a>,  2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Nuissier et al.(2011)Nuissier, Joly, Joly, Ducrocq, and
Arbogast</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nuissier, O., Joly, B., Joly, A., Ducrocq, V., and Arbogast, P.: A statistical
downscaling to identify the large-scale circulation patterns associated with
heavy precipitation events over southern France, Q. J.
Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 1812–1827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.866" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.866</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Pasquier(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pasquier, J.-L.: Les prélèvements d’eau douce en France : les grands
usages en 2013 et leur évolution depuis 20 ans, Rapport final, Ministère de
l'environnement, de l'énergie et de la mer, en charge des relations
internationales sur le climat, La Defense, France,  2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Pedregosa et al.(2011)Pedregosa, Varoquaux, Gramfort, Michel,
Thirion, Grisel, Blondel, Prettenhofer, Weiss, Dubourg, Vanderplas, Passos,
Cournapeau, Brucher, Perrot, and Duchesnay</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel,
O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J.,
Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.:
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn.
Res., 12, 2825–2830, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Philippe et al.(2011)Philippe, Habets, Ledoux, Goblet, Viennot, and
Mary</label><mixed-citation>
      
Philippe, E., Habets, F., Ledoux, E., Goblet, P., Viennot, P., and Mary, B.:
Improvement of the solute transfer in a conceptual unsaturated zone scheme: a
case study of the Seine River basin, Hydrol. Process., 25,
752–765, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7865</a>,  2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Phillips(1956)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Phillips, N. A.: The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical
experiment, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 82,
123–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708235202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708235202</a>,  1956.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Potter et al.(2020)Potter, Chiew, Charles, Fu, Zheng, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Potter, N. J., Chiew, F. H. S., Charles, S. P., Fu, G., Zheng, H., and Zhang,
L.: Bias in dynamically downscaled rainfall characteristics for hydroclimatic
projections, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2963–2979,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2963-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2963-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Prudhomme et al.(2014)Prudhomme, Giuntoli, Robinson, Clark, Arnell,
Dankers, Fekete, Franssen, Gerten, Gosling, Hagemann, Hannah, Kim, Masaki,
Satoh, Stacke, Wada, and Wisser</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prudhomme, C., Giuntoli, I., Robinson, E. L., Clark, D. B., Arnell, N. W.,
Dankers, R., Fekete, B. M., Franssen, W., Gerten, D., Gosling, S. N.,
Hagemann, S., Hannah, D. M., Kim, H., Masaki, Y., Satoh, Y., Stacke, T.,
Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.: Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots
and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3262–3267,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222473110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222473110</a>,  2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Rajib et al.(2014)Rajib, Sultana, Saha, and
Rahman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rajib, M. A., Sultana, S., Saha, M., and Rahman, M. M.: A multi-model
ensembling approach for developing plausible countryscale climate change
scenarios for future, Journal of Earth Science and Climatic Change, 5,
1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000179</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Randall(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randall, D. A. (Ed.): General Circulation Model Development: Past,
Present, and Future, Vol. 70, International Geophysics
Series, Elsevier Science, San Diego CA, Academic press edn., ISBN
978-0-08-050723-1,  2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Riahi et al.(2011)Riahi, Rao, Krey, Cho, Chirkov, Fischer,
Kindermann, Nakicenovic, and Rafaj</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann,
G., Nakicenovic, N., and Rafaj, P.: RCP8.5 – A scenario of comparatively
high greenhouse gas emissions, Climatic Change, 109, 33,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Robin et al.(2023)Robin, Corre, Marson, Bernus, Vrac, and
Thao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Robin, Y., Corre, L., Marson, P., Bernus, S., Vrac, M., and Thao, S.: Explore 2
: Anticiper les évolutions climlatiques et hydrologiques en France.
Projections Climatiques Régionalisées : Correction de Biais et
Changements Futurs, Rapport final version 1.2, INRAE, OiEau, IPSL,
Météo France, Gif-sur-Yvette, France,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/99X4CD" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57745/99X4CD</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Roehrig et al.(2020)Roehrig, Beau, Saint-Martin, Alias, Decharme,
Guérémy, Voldoire, Abdel-Lathif, Bazile, Belamari, Blein, Bouniol,
Bouteloup, Cattiaux, Chauvin, Chevallier, Colin, Douville, Marquet, Michou,
Nabat, Oudar, Peyrillé, Piriou, Salas y Mélia, Séférian, and
Sénési</label><mixed-citation>
      
Roehrig, R., Beau, I., Saint-Martin, D., Alias, A., Decharme, B., Guérémy,
J.-F., Voldoire, A., Abdel-Lathif, A. Y., Bazile, E., Belamari, S., Blein,
S., Bouniol, D., Bouteloup, Y., Cattiaux, J., Chauvin, F., Chevallier, M.,
Colin, J., Douville, H., Marquet, P., Michou, M., Nabat, P., Oudar, T.,
Peyrillé, P., Piriou, J.-M., Salas y Mélia, D., Séférian, R., and
Sénési, S.: The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE-Climat 6.3:
Description and Evaluation, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Syst., 12, e2020MS002075, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002075" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002075</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Saleh et al.(2013)Saleh, Ducharne, Flipo, Oudin, and
Ledoux</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saleh, F., Ducharne, A., Flipo, N., Oudin, L., and Ledoux, E.: Impact of river
bed morphology on discharge and water levels simulated by a 1D
Saint–Venant hydraulic model at regional scale, J. Hydrol.,
476, 169–177, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.027</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Sansom et al.(2013)Sansom, Stephenson, Ferro, Zappa, and
Shaffrey</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sansom, P. G., Stephenson, D. B., Ferro, C. A. T., Zappa, G., and Shaffrey, L.:
Simple Uncertainty Frameworks for Selecting Weighting Schemes and
Interpreting Multimodel Ensemble Climate Change Experiments,
J. Clim., 26, 4017–4037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00462.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00462.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Sauquet et al.(2024)Sauquet, Strohmenger, Thirel, and
Le Lay</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sauquet, E., Strohmenger, L., Thirel, G., and Le Lay, M.: Quelles évolutions
des régimes hydrologiques en France métropolitaine ?, Rapport final,
INRAE, EDF, Lyon, France, <a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/TLUTKF" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57745/TLUTKF</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Sauquet et al.(2026)Sauquet, Evin, Siauve, Aissat, Arnaud, Bérel,
Bonneau, Branger, Caballero, Colléoni, Ducharne, Gailhard, Habets,
Hendrickx, Héraut, Hingray, Huang, Jaouen, Jeantet, Lanini, Le Lay, Magand,
Mimeau, Monteil, Munier, Perrin, Robelin, Rousset, Soubeyroux, Strohmenger,
Thirel, Tocquer, Tramblay, Vergnes, and Vidal</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sauquet, E., Evin, G., Siauve, S., Aissat, R., Arnaud, P., Bérel, M., Bonneau, J., Branger, F., Caballero, Y., Colléoni, F., Ducharne, A., Gailhard, J., Habets, F., Hendrickx, F., Héraut, L., Hingray, B., Huang, P., Jaouen, T., Jeantet, A., Lanini, S., Le Lay, M., Magand, C., Mimeau, L., Monteil, C., Munier, S., Perrin, C., Robelin, O., Rousset, F., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Strohmenger, L., Thirel, G., Tocquer, F., Tramblay, Y., Vergnes, J.-P., and Vidal, J.-P.: A large transient multi-scenario multi-model ensemble of future streamflow and groundwater projections in France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 2277–2300, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2277-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2277-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Seguin(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seguin, J.-J.: Proposition d’un indicateur piézométrique standardisé pour
le Bulletin de Situation Hydrologique “Nappes”, Rapport finale
BRGM/RP-64147-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France,  2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Shepherd(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shepherd, T. G.: Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate
change information, P. Roy. Soc. A, 475, 20190013,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0013</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Shepherd et al.(2018)Shepherd, Boyd, Calel, Chapman, Dessai,
Dima-West, Fowler, James, Maraun, Martius, Senior, Sobel, Stainforth, Tett,
Trenberth, van den Hurk, Watkins, Wilby, and
Zenghelis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shepherd, T. G., Boyd, E., Calel, R. A., Chapman, S. C., Dessai, S., Dima-West,
I. M., Fowler, H. J., James, R., Maraun, D., Martius, O., Senior, C. A.,
Sobel, A. H., Stainforth, D. A., Tett, S. F. B., Trenberth, K. E., van den
Hurk, B. J. J. M., Watkins, N. W., Wilby, R. L., and Zenghelis, D. A.:
Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical
aspects of climate change, Climatic Change, 151, 555–571,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Sobaga et al.(2024)Sobaga, Habets, Beaudoin, Léonard, and
Decharme</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sobaga, A., Habets, F., Beaudoin, N., Léonard, J., and Decharme, B.:
Decreasing trend of groundwater recharge with limited impact of intense
precipitation: Evidence from long-term lysimeter data, J.
Hydrol., 637, 131340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131340" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131340</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Soubeyroux et al.(2021)Soubeyroux, Bernus, Corre, Drouin, Dubuisson,
Etchevers, Gouget, Josse, Kerdoncuff, Samacoits, and
Tocquet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soubeyroux, J.-M., Bernus, S., Corre, L., Drouin, A., Dubuisson, B., Etchevers,
P., Gouget, V., Josse, P., Kerdoncuff, M., Samacoits, R., and Tocquet, F.:
Les nouvelles projections climatiques de référence DRIAS 2020 pour la
métropole, Rapport technique, Météo-France, Toulouse,  2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Stollsteiner(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stollsteiner, P.: Projet Explore 2070 : Evaluation de l'impact du
changement climatique, Rapport finale BRGM/RP-61483-FR, BRGM, Orléans,
France,  2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Tapiador et al.(2020)Tapiador, Navarro, Moreno, Sánchez, and
García-Ortega</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tapiador, F. J., Navarro, A., Moreno, R., Sánchez, J. L., and García-Ortega,
E.: Regional climate models: 30 years of dynamical downscaling, Atmos.
Res., 235, 104785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104785</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Taylor et al.(2012)Taylor, Stouffer, and
Meehl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and
the Experiment Design, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
93, 485–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1</a>,  2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Thiéry(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thiéry, D.: Code de calcul MARTHE – Modélisation 3D des écoulements
dans les hydrosystèmes – Notice d’utilisation de la version 7.5, Rapport
finale BRGM/RP-64554-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France,  2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Thomson et al.(2011)Thomson, Calvin, Smith, Kyle, Volke, Patel,
Delgado-Arias, Bond-Lamberty, Wise, Clarke, and Edmonds</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thomson, A. M., Calvin, K. V., Smith, S. J., Kyle, G. P., Volke, A., Patel, P.,
Delgado-Arias, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Wise, M. A., Clarke, L. E., and
Edmonds, J. A.: RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by
2100, Climatic Change, 109, 77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0151-4</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Tramblay and Somot(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tramblay, Y. and Somot, S.: Future evolution of extreme precipitation in the
Mediterranean, Climatic Change, 151, 289–302,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2300-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2300-5</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Tramblay et al.(2024)Tramblay, Sauquet, Arnaud, Rousset, Soubeyroux,
Jeantet, Munier, and Vergnes</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tramblay, Y., Sauquet, E., Arnaud, P., Rousset, F., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Jeantet,
A., Munier, S., and Vergnes, J.-P.: Scénarios d'extrêmes hydrologiques,
Rapport final, IRD, INRAE, Météo-France, CNRM, BRGM, Montpellier, France,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.57745/2XDJ5H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.57745/2XDJ5H</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Tramblay et al.(2025)Tramblay, Thirel, Strohmenger, Evin, Corre,
Heraut, and Sauquet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tramblay, Y., Thirel, G., Strohmenger, L., Evin, G., Corre, L., Heraut, L., and
Sauquet, E.: Evolution of flood generating processes under climate change in
France, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 7023–7039,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7023-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7023-2025</a>,  2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Van Loon(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought explained, WIREs Water, 2, 359–392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085</a>,  2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>van Vuuren et al.(2007)van Vuuren, den Elzen, Lucas, Eickhout,
Strengers, van Ruijven, Wonink, and van Houdt</label><mixed-citation>
      
van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, M. G. J., Lucas, P. L., Eickhout, B., Strengers,
B. J., van Ruijven, B., Wonink, S., and van Houdt, R.: Stabilizing greenhouse
gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and
costs, Climatic Change, 81, 119–159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Verfaillie et al.(2017)Verfaillie, Déqué, Morin, and
Lafaysse</label><mixed-citation>
      
Verfaillie, D., Déqué, M., Morin, S., and Lafaysse, M.: The method ADAMONT
v1.0 for statistical adjustment of climate projections applicable to energy
balance land surface models, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4257–4283,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4257-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4257-2017</a>,  2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Vergnes et al.(2020)Vergnes, Roux, Habets, Ackerer, Amraoui, Besson,
Caballero, Courtois, de Dreuzy, Etchevers, Gallois, Leroux, Longuevergne,
Le Moigne, Morel, Munier, Regimbeau, Thiéry, and
Viennot</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vergnes, J.-P., Roux, N., Habets, F., Ackerer, P., Amraoui, N., Besson, F.,
Caballero, Y., Courtois, Q., de Dreuzy, J.-R., Etchevers, P., Gallois, N.,
Leroux, D. J., Longuevergne, L., Le Moigne, P., Morel, T., Munier, S.,
Regimbeau, F., Thiéry, D., and Viennot, P.: The AquiFR hydrometeorological
modelling platform as a tool for improving groundwater resource monitoring
over France: evaluation over a 60-year period, Hydrol. Earth Syst.
Sci., 24, 633–654, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-633-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-633-2020</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Vergnes et al.(2023)Vergnes, Caballero, and
Lanini</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vergnes, J.-P., Caballero, Y., and Lanini, S.: Assessing climate change impact
on French groundwater resources using a spatially distributed
hydrogeological model, Hydrol. Sci. J., 68, 209–227,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2150553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2150553</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Vetter et al.(2015)Vetter, Huang, Aich, Yang, Wang, Krysanova, and
Hattermann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vetter, T., Huang, S., Aich, V., Yang, T., Wang, X., Krysanova, V., and
Hattermann, F.: Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for
three large-scale river basins on three continents, Earth Syst. Dynam., 6,
17–43, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-17-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-17-2015</a>,  2015.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Vidal et al.(2010)Vidal, Martin, Franchistéguy, Baillon, and
Soubeyroux</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vidal, J.-P., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., and Soubeyroux,
J.-M.: A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with
the Safran system, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1627–1644,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2003</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Vidal et al.(2016)Vidal, Hingray, Magand, Sauquet, and
Ducharne</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vidal, J.-P., Hingray, B., Magand, C., Sauquet, E., and Ducharne, A.: Hierarchy
of climate and hydrological uncertainties in transient low-flow projections,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3651–3672,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3651-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
