<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-30-2543-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Leveraging 20 years of remote sensing to characterize surface phytoplankton seasonality and long-term trends in lake Tanganyika</article-title><alt-title>Leveraging 20 years of remote sensing</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Toussaint</surname><given-names>François</given-names></name>
          <email>francois.toussaint@uclouvain.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6949-8964</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>Alice</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-6759</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vanclooster</surname><given-names>Marnik</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-8723</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Earth and Life Institute – Environmental Sciences (ELIE), Faculty of Biosciences Engineering, UCLouvain, Croix du Sud 2, L7.05.02,  1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">François Toussaint (francois.toussaint@uclouvain.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>30</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>2543</fpage><lpage>2556</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>March</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>21</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 François Toussaint et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e101">Lake Tanganyika, the world's second-largest freshwater lake by volume, is a vital resource for millions in East Africa, providing water, food, and economic opportunities while supporting exceptional biodiversity.</p>

      <p id="d2e104">Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a key indicator of phytoplankton biomass. In Lake Tanganyika, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is known to display strong spatiotemporal horizontal variability with an exceptionally low annual mean and wide ranges of concentrations compared to other tropical or temperate great lakes. This variability is influenced by the lake's hydrodynamic cycle driven by air temperature and wind seasonality. Phytoplankton biomass is suspected to be decreasing due to a strengthening of water column stratification induced by climate change. However, the particular spatiotemporal variability and trends in phytoplankton biomass have never been examined using a lake-wide, temporally continuous long-term record. This study bridges this gap by analyzing satellite remote sensing-derived Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the ESA Climate Change Initiative Lakes dataset across the entire surface of Lake Tanganyika over a 20-year period. It offers insight into the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics with an unprecedented timespan and spatial coverage.</p>

      <p id="d2e142">The analysis reveals distinct seasonal patterns in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with shallow regions (depth <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 m) maintaining higher levels year-round, while deeper areas exhibit pronounced seasonality tightly linked to known wind patterns. To further explore these spatial differences in seasonal dynamics, the study identifies seven clusters of co-varying Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, each displaying distinct seasonal behaviours that reflect the lake's hydrodynamic cycle. Long-term trends indicate a decline in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 % per decade in deep regions, suggesting decreasing phytoplankton biomass. However, this overall decline is nuanced by monthly patterns. In deep regions, the low Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, mainly observed between November and April, tend to decrease over time at rates between -5 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 % per decade when averaged over entire clusters. In contrast, highest Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values recorded during the most productive months, from August to October, show increasing trends up to 25 %. Nearly all shallow areas, meanwhile, display year-round increases up to 35 % across the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution, with particularly sharp rises in extreme values.</p>

      <p id="d2e209">The findings underscore the complexity of Lake Tanganyika's Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics. The observed trends may have significant consequences for the lake's trophic structure and the communities dependent on its resources. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying drivers of these changes and to assess their broader ecological and socio-economic impacts.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e228">Lakes play a fundamental role in global biogeochemical cycles and provide essential ecosystem services, serving as crucial water resources for millions of people (Wetzel, 2001). However, these fragile ecosystems face increasing pressure from climate change, pollution and other stressors, which drive profound changes in their physical, chemical, and biological properties (Brönmark and Hansson, 2002). Given their sensitivity to environmental shifts, lakes are often considered sentinels of change, rapidly responding to alterations in temperature, precipitation, and human-induced disturbances (Adrian et al., 2009; Williamson et al., 2009). Continuous monitoring of water quality is essential to better understand these ecosystems, for assessing the transformations they are undergoing and guiding adaptive management efforts.</p>
      <p id="d2e231">One important indicator of lake ecosystem dynamics is phytoplankton biomass (Xu et al., 2001). Variations in phytoplankton biomass can signal shifts in trophic state, alterations of ecosystem dynamics, or direct anthropogenic pressures such as water pollution. Since phytoplankton form the base of the aquatic food web, fluctuations in their abundance directly influence higher trophic levels and therefore the whole ecosystem (Wetzel, 2001). Measurements of phytoplankton concentration are typically made at discrete locations, either via boat campaigns or from easily accessible buoys (Kutser, 2009; Lombard et al., 2019). However, in large bodies of water, such methods may not adequately represent the overall water quality across the entire surface. Additionally, temporal availability can present challenges, as these methods are often limited in sampling frequency. In recent decades, the use of optical satellite remote sensing to estimate phytoplankton biomass has emerged as a powerful tool, providing broad spatial coverage and continuous temporal monitoring across large water bodies (Gordon and Wang, 1994; Hu and Campbell, 2014; Martin, 2014; McClain et al., 2006; Moore et al., 2014; Moses et al., 2009; Neil et al., 2019). It involves estimating chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentration by utilizing its distinctive absorption peaks in the blue and red bands (Martin, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d2e248">Lake Tanganyika, located in East Africa, is the second most voluminous freshwater lake in the world. It spans four countries, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Burundi, and Rwanda. It is an essential resource for millions of people living along its shores, who rely on the lake's fish as their primary source of animal protein but also for water and economic opportunities (Bulengela, 2024; Mölsä et al., 2002; Niyongabo et al., 2024; Paffen et al., 1997). The lake is characterized by its unique ecosystem, which supports a wide range of endemic species, particularly in its fish communities (Coulter, 1991). This ecosystem is increasingly exposed to a multitude of threats as climate change poses significant challenges, exacerbated by human activities (Plisnier et al., 2018). Extreme high water levels in recent years have had severe consequences, causing floods and population displacements (Gbetkom et al., 2024; Papa et al., 2023). Physical parameters of the lake are changing such as water temperature that increases along with air temperature, causing a strengthening of vertical stratification (O'Reilly et al., 2003; Verburg et al., 2003). This increased stratification is expected to reduce nutrient upwelling, thereby limiting phytoplankton growth, the key driver of the lake's food web and fisheries. Reduction in vertical mixing has caused the oxycline to rises, restricting habitats to shallower areas (Cohen et al., 2016; Van Bocxlaer et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e251">Lake Tanganyika's water quality and ecosystem dynamics have been the focus of numerous studies, many of them focusing on primary production and phytoplankton concentrations (Bergamino et al., 2007, 2010; Corman et al., 2010; Descy et al., 2005; Hecky and Fee, 1981; Hecky and Kling, 1981; Langenberg et al., 2002; Stenuite et al., 2007). Field campaigns have usually focused on specific regions of the lake, often nearshore and during limited time periods (Plisnier, et al., 2023). Phytoplankton concentrations in the lake are generally low but they exhibit high spatial and temporal variability, making it challenging to characterize their lake-wide dynamics with sparse in situ measurements. Satellite remote sensing provides a complementary approach. Horion et al. (2010) validated a MODIS-based algorithm for estimating Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Lake Tanganyika using in-situ measurements collected between 2002 and 2006. The algorithm applied in their study is similar to the one used in the lakes_CCI processing chain, which ensures consistency with that validated approach in the context of our study. Bergamino et al. (2010) then used MODIS remote sensing data based on Horion's algorithm to estimate annual primary production over the entire lake surface based on three years of observations. Their study was limited to a short time series and did not characterize seasonal variability or assess long-term trends in phytoplankton dynamics. No study to date has provided a comprehensive, long-term assessment of phytoplankton dynamics across the entire lake surface, preventing a full understanding of spatial patterns, seasonal cycles, and long-term trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e262">This study aims to analyse the spatiotemporal variability of surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations across the entire surface of Lake Tanganyika, with particular attention to regional differences in seasonal dynamics. We also seek to assess long-term trends over the past two decades and examine changes in the statistical distribution of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an emphasis on extreme values. Finally, we aim to compare Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends between deep and shallower zones of the lake to identify potential differences in their responses to environmental and climatic drivers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Material and Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study Site</title>
      <p id="d2e301">Lake Tanganyika is the largest African Great Lake, located between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.6  and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.8° N and 29.2 and 31.2° E (Fig. 1). It is 650 km long, averaging 50 km of width along a North-West to South-East axis and has an area of more than 32 600 km<sup>2</sup>. It comprises three main basins, with the deepest point reaching 1400 m located in the central basin.</p>
      <p id="d2e327">The region's climate is characterized by a pronounced wet season from September to April, with average annual precipitations of approximately 1000 mm. Air temperatures are relatively stable, typically ranging between 25  and 29 °C. Strong southeast winds peak in July–August before weakening in September as the Intertropical Convergence Zone shifts (Nicholson, 2000), while lighter northerly winds dominate the rest of the year (Coulter, 1991).</p>
      <p id="d2e330">Surface water temperatures vary seasonally between 24 to 28 °C while deep-water temperatures remain stable at 23.45 °C. Lake Tanganyika is highly stratified and meromictic, meaning its water column never fully mixes (Coulter, 1991). Seasonal monsoon winds dominate the mixing processes. During the dry season (May–August), strong southeast winds tilt the thermocline, causing it to rise closer to the surface in the south. This disruption of stratification in the south favors upwellings, which enhance nutrient cycling and promote phytoplankton growth. Simultaneously, surface waters are pushed northward, causing downwelling in the northern basin. As winds relax during the wet season transition (September–October), stratification returns in the south while secondary upwellings occur in the north. Internal seiching, a lake-wide oscillation of the thermocline, becomes prominent, driving mixing and primary production especially when its amplitude reaches surface waters (Corman et al., 2010; Coulter, 1991; Langenberg et al., 2002, 2003; Naithani et al., 2002; Plisnier et al., 2023b, 1999; Plisnier and Coenen, 2001).</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e336">Map of Lake Tanganyika bathymetry, surrounding countries, major towns, and key rivers (Inflow: Ruzizi, Malagarasi; Outflow: Lukuga).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e345">Lake Tanganyika's water is remarkably clear, ithan average Secchi disk depth transparency of around 12 m (Plisnier et al., 2015). Nutrient levels at the surface are generally low. Phytoplankton concentration show great spatiotemporal variability depending on the nutrient availability in the euphotic zone. The seasonality of phytoplankton concentration, often measured in terms of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels or estimates of primary production, depends on the hydrodynamic cycle and winds seasonality. Phytoplankton biomass is located between depths from 0 to 40 m with maxima commonly found between 0–20 m (Descy et al., 2010; Salonen et al., 1999; Vuorio et al., 2003). Bergamino et al. (2010) used remote sensing data from 2002 to 2005 to estimate primary productivity over the whole lake's surface based on MODIS data. They computed an average of 646 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 142 mg C m<sup>−2</sup> per day. They also showed the remarkable differences between some coastal zones around the lake in shallower areas showing values above 800 mg C m<sup>−2</sup> per day and the rest of the lake where primary production was lower. The lake's stratification regime has indeed confined the distribution of benthic organisms to a narrow band of biodiversity around the lake within the upper, oxygen-rich water layer (Van Bocxlaer et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e386">Lake Tanganyika has experienced significant warming, with recent temperature increases unprecedented in the past 1500 years (Tierney et al., 2010). Since 1913, the upper water column has warmed at approximately 0.1 °C per decade (Kraemer et al., 2015; O'Reilly et al., 2003), with higher rates in the north due to weaker vertical mixing. Seasonal variations exist, with slower warming during the dry season (0.08 °C per decade) and faster warming near the shore (Verburg and Hecky, 2009). This warming trend is expected to increase the stability of the water column and reduce vertical mixing (O'Reilly et al., 2003; Tierney et al., 2010; Verburg et al., 2003; Verburg and Hecky, 2009).</p>
      <p id="d2e389">Direct measurements of primary production have been too intermittent to determine whether the changes in the lake have caused a decrease in productivity (Macintyre, 2012). O'Reilly et al. (2003) suggested a 20 % decline in primary productivity and a 30 % reduction in fish yields based on carbon isotope records from sediment cores. Reduced silica demand by diatoms further indicates a shift toward a more oligotrophic system (Verburg et al., 2003; Verburg and Hecky, 2009). Stenuite et al. (2007) reported daily mean and daily minimum primary production below previous estimates while Bergamino et al. (2010) estimated primary productivity in 2003 using remote sensing data and found a 15 % decrease compared to the estimate by Hecky and Fee (1981), though the studies used different methodologies.</p>
      <p id="d2e392">An increase in water temperature is also expected to reduce the mixing and oxycline depths, reducing ecosystem habitats (Cohen et al., 2016; O'Reilly et al., 2003; Verburg et al., 2003). Indeed, if vertical mixing is reduced, the oxygen consumed by metabolic respiration cannot be replenished through mixing, leading to its depletion. This should cause a narrowing of the ring of benthic biodiversity in the lake. Concurrently, water clarity has improved as phytoplankton levels have declined. This could enhance benthic primary production relative to that of pelagic phytoplankton (Van Bocxlaer et al., 2012). All these environmental changes are coupled with observations of declining fish populations even before the era of commercial fishing (Cohen et al., 2016).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Dataset</title>
      <p id="d2e403">We used the ESA Climate Change Initiative Lakes dataset (Lakes_cci Version 2.1) (Carrea et al., 2024).This dataset contains Essential Climate Variables (ECV) such as lake water level and extent, lake surface water temperature (LSWT), Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and water turbidity for over 2000 lakes worldwide. The Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coverage spanned from 2002 to 2022, with a theoretical daily temporal resolution, that may vary due to cloud cover, and a spatial resolution of 1/120th of a degree of latitude. This roughly corresponds to a spatial resolution of 1 km near the equator. Data from different satellite products (MERIS on Envisat, MODIS on Terra and Aqua, and OLCI on Sentinel-3) were harmonized to produce a temporally consistent Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset. The Lakes_cci dataset also provides uncertainties layers associated with each ECV. For Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 90 % of the dataset had an associated fractional uncertainty between 39 and 60 %. MODIS data was not released for most lakes in the dataset including Lake Tanganyika. The dataset therefore shows a data gap during the 2012 to 2016 period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data Interpolation Method</title>
      <p id="d2e442">Due to cloud cover and satellite revisit times, the dataset contains gaps, with some days missing data entirely or having incomplete coverage of the lake. To address this, we applied an interpolation method to fill in missing data and ensure continuity in the analysis. The Data Interpolating Empirical Orthogonal Functions (DINEOF) technique was used for spatio-temporal interpolation of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and LSWT data (Alvera-Azcárate et al., 2005; Beckers and Rixen, 2003). The method consists in iteratively decomposing and reconstructing the dataset in a set of empirical orthogonal functions (EOF), expressed as spatial and temporal modes. This process is repeated until the root mean square error, computed on a spatially coherent set of validation pixels, converges to a stable value. These validation pixels were selected as contiguous areas of 10 000 pixels from the 15 images with the least cloud coverage in the dataset. We found 7 to be the optimal number of EOF modes that minimizes the error function. We applied this interpolation procedure solely to images containing less than 95 % missing values, as recommended by the method. Other images were not altered and remained in the dataset in their original state.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Analysis methods for Seasonal and Interannual Variations of Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e467">To capture the seasonal dynamics of surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, we first generated monthly median maps of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by computing the median of all values observed during each month at each location. These maps illustrate the general spatial patterns of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the lake. However, they cannot be used to display the short-term and interannual variability in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e498">To address this limitation and provide a more detailed characterization of the temporal variability of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Tanganyika, we partitioned the lake into regions with co-varying Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations rather than analysing the lake as a whole. To do the partitioning, we used k-means clustering (MacQueen, 1967) with the seven spatial empirical orthogonal function modes previously computed using the DINEOF method as input. The optimal number of spatial clusters, determined using the silhouette value (Rousseeuw, 1987), was found to be 7. To characterize the temporal variability of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we computed two complementary time series for each cluster. The first captures the interannual variability of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated as the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles of all observations for each month between January 2002 and December 2022. The second time series represents the seasonal cycle of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and is calculated as the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles of all Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates within each cluster for each day of the year, pooling data across all years in the time series. This means that each day's statistics represent interannual daily percentiles, derived from the corresponding day across all years in the dataset. We had first applied a five-day rolling mean to the time series of each pixel over the entire period from 2002 to 2022. This smoothing method was selected to reduce the impact of outliers, minimize the influence of missing data while preserving short-term variability, following the approach of Laliberté and Larouche (2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e544">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends were independently calculated for each pixel across Lake Tanganyika using daily time-step data from the lakes_cci dataset for the period 2002 to 2022. Before conducting the trend analysis, we first removed the seasonal cycle. To do this, we determined the interannual median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for each pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on each day of the year (DOY), averaging across all years in the time series. These seasonal cycles were then smoothed using a 5 d rolling mean. Finally, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies were calculated by subtracting the smoothed seasonal values from the observed Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations following Eq. (1), ensuring that the trend analysis focused on long-term changes rather than recurring seasonal fluctuations.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOY</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (the total number of pixels covering the lake) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the day number within the period from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2022. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DOY</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the interannual median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the corresponding DOY, averaged across all years, and smoothed using a 5 d rolling mean. Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the deviation of the observed Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the expected seasonal median value.</p>
      <p id="d2e773">Overall Trends in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated using the Sen's slope estimator <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> following Eq. (2), expressed in mg m<sup>−3</sup> per decade, alongside a Mann-Kendall test for significance. The Sen's slope, defined as the median of all pairwise slopes in the time series (Sen, 1968), provides a robust estimate of trend magnitude.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M66" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">median</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>for all</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies for pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at times <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e982">Firstly, overall absolute trends were computed for each pixel using all available observations and are expressed as changes in surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration per decade. Overall relative trends were then computed by dividing the overall absolute trends by the median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at each pixel following Eq. (3), providing a relative measure of change, expressed in percentage by decade.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M75" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">relative</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chl</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration anomaly at pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the study period.</p>
      <p id="d2e1082">To capture intra-annual variations of these trends, monthly relative trends were also estimated using only the observations for each specific month of the year.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Partition and Shifts in Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Distribution</title>
      <p id="d2e1102">In addition to analysing overall and monthly trends per pixel, we assessed if there was any shift in yearly statistical distribution of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over time. To achieve this, we computed trends for a set of yearly quantile values, consisting of those at 2.5 % intervals along with the uppermost quantiles at 98 %, 98.5 %, 99 %, 99.5 %, and 99.9 %. Recognizing that lake-wide trends might obscure local variability, we conducted this analysis within the seven previously defined clusters of similar temporal Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> variability. For each pixel, we calculated all yearly quantile values and determined trends from 2002 to 2022 using the Sen's slope estimator following Eq. (4). Relative trends were then calculated by dividing each yearly quantile trend by its interannual mean, yielding rates of change. Finally, we spatially aggregated the results by calculating the median rate of change for each quantile within each cluster following Eq. (5).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M82" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">median</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">relative</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">median</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  is the Sen's slope estimator for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th quantile, calculated as the median of pairwise slopes between yearly quantile values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over years <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2002 and 2022. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">relative</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the median rate of change for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantile within a specific cluster <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> , calculated based on all pixels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within this cluster. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the interannual mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th quantile at pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across all years. This analysis was conducted separately for pixels in deep and shallower zones, as these two areas are influenced by distinct processes influencing Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Seasonality of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Concentrations</title>
      <p id="d2e1468">The maps of interannual monthly median surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. 2 highlight strong differences between some coastal zones and the rest of the lake. These coastal zones usually extend a few kilometres offshore and are relatively shallow, with depths generally not exceeding 250 m (Fig. 1). They exhibit consistently higher median concentrations throughout the year, above 3 mg m<sup>−3</sup> in some areas. In contrast, open waters with greater depths and deep nearshore zones exhibit a more pronounced Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality, displaying low median levels outside the productive season between January and April, below 0.3 mg m<sup>−3</sup>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1509">Shallow zones with year-round higher Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are scattered around the lake. The northern zone, off the coast of Bujumbura and the Bujumbura Rural Province, feature an extensive shallow area where depths of less than 100 meters stretch up to 6 kilometres offshore. It is characterized by consistently elevated Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, which also extend further south along the gently sloped shores of Burundi. The Gulf of Burton, located south of Baraka on the north-western coast, shares similarities with the waters off Bujumbura, featuring a large shallow zone with sustained higher Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels compared to deeper areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e1533">The coastal area south of Kigoma spans 700 km<sup>2</sup> at depths of less than 200 m, including 400 km<sup>2</sup> shallower than 100 m. It remains highly productive throughout the year. Some of the highest Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Lake Tanganyika are observed at the Malagarasi river's estuary where a 40 km<sup>2</sup> area near the river mouth exhibits mean Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels exceeding 3 mg m<sup>−3</sup>. Other remarkably productive regions include the shallow zones near Kalemie and the southeastern Gulf in the DRC as well as areas near Mpulungu in Zambia.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1593">Maps of interannual monthly median surface chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Lake Tanganyika (2002–2022).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1609">By contrast, the Tanzanian coast north of Kigoma, where depth sharply increases offshore, shows Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels and seasonality comparable to that of the pelagic waters at this latitude. Similar patterns are observed along the DRC coast, both north of Kabimba and north of the border with Zambia, for example. Pelagic areas and deeper nearshore zones of the lake display monthly median surface concentrations below 1 mg m<sup>−3</sup> with the lowest median levels between 0.1 and 0.3 mg m<sup>−3</sup> observed in April. Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels start rising in the southern regions of the lake in April and this increase gradually progresses northward in the following months, reaching the northern areas only by September. Peak concentrations are typically observed between August and November in the south and between October and November in the north. From December to April, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations progressively decrease across the entire lake, starting from the south.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial Clustering for Improved Characterization of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> variability</title>
      <p id="d2e1673">Figure 3 illustrates the spatial aggregations into clusters of co-varying Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations that divide Lake Tanganyika from north to south into six relatively spatially coherent regions. Cluster 7 stands out as it groups pixels from shallow coastal regions across the lake, all characterized by consistently higher Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels throughout the year.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1692">Clustering of Lake Tanganyika into regions of co-varying chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering method.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1715">Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observations within each cluster were aggregated to visualize both interannual variability and seasonal patterns. The left panel in Fig. 4 highlights substantial interannual variability across all clusters. Clear seasonal patterns emerge in clusters 1 to 6, characterized by alternating periods of lower and higher phytoplankton biomass. However, the timing of peak Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations within the productive season varies from year to year, and multiple peaks may occur within a single year. The magnitude of these peaks also fluctuates greatly between years. In contrast, cluster 7, which represents the shallow coastal zones surrounding the lake, is characterized by persistently higher Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations throughout the entire observation period and year-round, with no clear seasonal pattern, as shown in the right panel of Fig. 4. Median daily Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in this cluster consistently range around 1 mg m<sup>−3</sup>. Although they show remarkable interannual variability, the other clusters do show clear general seasonal patterns. From late April, median concentrations start to increase in clusters 1 and 2, at the very south of the lake. This increase persists until August and September, with median daily levels remaining below 1 mg m<sup>−3</sup> during this period. The daily 75th and 90th percentile time series show recurrent peak values that indicate frequent phytoplankton blooms in these regions. At the very end of the dry season, higher surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are observed at the southern tip of Lake Tanganyika. Concentrations in clusters 1 and 2 then drop back to lower levels in September until mid-October. This coincides with the first peaks of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northernmost clusters 5 and 6, following a slow increase in concentrations that started in July. This northern Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increase at the beginning of the wet season is followed by a gradual southward shift of phytoplankton blooms across all clusters 5, 4, 3, and 2 over the following month. The magnitude of these blooms varies from year to year, both in spatial extent and in peak concentrations, but they consistently follow a southward progression. The September-October blooms in clusters 5, 4 and 3 are followed by a sharp decrease in the 75th and 90th quantiles time series, indicating a calm period with fewer extreme bloom events and a general decrease in concentrations towards the end of the wet season. Cluster 6 experiences blooms that gradually weaken and become less frequent until the end of the wet season. The two southernmost clusters reach their highest Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in October and November, before showing a decline in concentrations over the following months, with recurrent but less intense blooms.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1802">Interannual and seasonal variations in chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, represented by the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles of all observations within each cluster. The left panel shows interannual variability based on monthly quantiles from 2002 to 2022, while the right panel depicts the seasonal cycle using daily quantiles pooled across the same period.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Overall Patterns of Change in Surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e1833">Figure 5 shows maps of overall absolute and relative decadal trends in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Lake Tanganyika and the corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values. A general decrease in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is observed across most of the lake's surface, except in shallow areas where concentrations remain higher throughout the year. To examine how trends vary with depth, we computed the mean Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trend for all pixels within the same depth range, using 10 m depth intervals. The results show positive mean trend values in areas with maximum depths up to 170 m, beyond which the average trends become negative. For subsequent analyses, this depth will serve as the boundary distinguishing the pelagic and deeper coastal zones from the shallower coastal zones of the lake. Negative absolute trends found in deeper regions are small, rarely exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 mg m<sup>−3</sup> per decade. They are generally statistically significant, as large areas show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values below 1 %, as seen on panel C. Although the negative trends indicate a slight decrease in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, they are found in regions where average Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels are already very low. When expressed relative to the interannual median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, these relative trends correspond to rates of change ranging from close to 0 down to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % per decade, with an average relative trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 % per decade. The most severe relative trends in deep zones are found in the north basin and in the south of the lake.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e1929">Maps of overall trends in surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Lake Tanganyika, depicting absolute trends <bold>(A)</bold>, relative trends computed with respect to pixel-specific median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations <bold>(B)</bold> and corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-values <bold>(C)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1969">Positive trends are observed across 13 % of the lake's surface, mostly in shallower coastal areas that exhibit the highest year-round levels of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These shallower zones with depth less than 170 m show a wide range of trend values compared to deeper areas, with both lower negative and higher positive absolute trends. Negative relative trends in shallower zones are generally less pronounced than those in deep areas. 25 % of trends in shallow areas exceed 10 % per decade and 10 % exceed 25 % per decade, with some locations reaching increases of up to 50 %. The maximum values are found near Bujumbura, Kigoma and Kalemie, at the estuary of the Malagarasi river and in the Gulf of Burton, where trends values exceed 1 mg m<sup>−3</sup> per decade.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Monthly Dynamics of Surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Trends</title>
      <p id="d2e2008">Throughout the year, the lake's dynamics reveal a complex pattern of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends. Figure 6 illustrates monthly relative trends in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, calculated based on monthly trends divided by the monthly median. Pelagic trends appear to closely align with Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality. In the deeper areas of the lake, trends generally shift from predominantly decreasing between February and July to mostly increasing between August and October. From February to April, as Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations reach their lowest annual levels, starting in the south and progressing northwards as seen in Fig. 2, negative Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends follow the same south-to-north pattern, extending across all deeper regions of the lake by April. Relative trends show peak negative values of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 % per decade, as seen in Fig. 6, amounting to absolute trends up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 mg m<sup>−3</sup> per decade. Starting in May, trends in deeper zones increase from the south. By August, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends reach a first positive peak in southern clusters 1, 2, and 3, with relative increases ranging between 10 % and 20 % per decade and up to 30 % per decade in the far south. In contrast, August trends show no statistical significance in the northern deeper areas of the lake. In September, significant positive trends are found in the centre and northern part of the lake, reaching values of up to 50 % per decade in some areas. October is characterized by widespread positive trends in surface Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, with the highest values observed in the central and southern parts of the lake. From November to January, trend values become less pronounced and less significant, coinciding with the rainy season when the availability of optical data is at its lowest. Contrasting with the seasonality of pelagic Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends, shallow zones exhibit positive Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> trends throughout the year. These trends remain relatively stable in magnitude.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2104">Maps of monthly relative trends in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in Lake Tanganyika (2002–2022).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Partition and Shifts in Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Distribution</title>
      <p id="d2e2137">To evaluate how the yearly distribution of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations has evolved from 2002 to 2022, we analysed trends of yearly quantiles values for each pixel covering Lake Tanganyika. Figure 7 shows spatial median quantile trends by cluster across the yearly statistical distribution of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a distinct focus between deeper and shallower regions. Overall, we see that nearly all clusters exhibit slightly positive changes in shallow areas for most of their distribution, with higher trends for the highest quantile values. In deeper zones, most clusters exhibit negative changes for quantiles up to the 75th to 90th percentiles.</p>
      <p id="d2e2154">More specifically, shallow areas show the steepest increases in cluster 7, while cluster 2 exhibits decreasing values between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % per decade across most of its distribution, below the 80th quantile. Clusters 1 and 4 display near-zero changes in their lower quantiles while clusters 3, 5 and 6 show modest increases of between 5 % and 15 % per decade. Notably, all clusters exhibit sharp increases in the highest quantiles, ranging from 10 % to 30 % per decade. For trends in deeper areas, clusters 1 to 5 exhibit decreases for all quantiles below the 75th to the 90th percentiles, with values ranging from 0 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 % per decade. In contrast, higher quantiles show sharp increases, ranging from 10 % to 30 % per decade. Cluster 6, located at the northern end of the lake, shows consistent increases around 5 % per decade for the entire distribution below the 90th percentile. For both shallow and deep zones of the lake, this peaks in trends for the highest yearly quantiles could suggest more frequent extreme events, although statistical tests failed to detect any significant changes in the frequency or extent of major bloom events.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e2180">Cluster-specific median rate of change in yearly Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quantiles in shallower and deeper zones. The map of the lake shows the areas shallower than 170 m in each cluster.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/2543/2026/hess-30-2543-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e2205">The analysis of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) seasonality in Lake Tanganyika reveals a highly structured yet dynamic ecosystem, whose spatial and temporal variability cannot be fully captured by field-based observations alone. Satellite remote sensing provides a long-term, lake-wide perspective, allowing Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonality to be characterized across the entire surface over an unprecedented time span.</p>
      <p id="d2e2229">In pelagic waters, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> closely follows the lake's hydrodynamic cycle, highlighting the dominant influence of wind-driven thermocline dynamics on phytoplankton biomass. While the hydrodynamic framework identifies four seasonal periods, satellite observations suggest a simpler, three-phase biological response. During the dry, windy season, southeasterly winds tilt the thermocline, increasing nutrient availability and triggering phytoplankton blooms, with maximum concentrations appearing first in the south. After the wind reverses, thermocline oscillations propagate blooms from north to south, consistent with previously described upwelling dynamics. Notably, Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations during this phase are higher than those reported in earlier studies, suggesting either stronger bloom intensity or improved detection via satellite data. During the late rainy season, weaker winds and a deepening thermocline produce a basin-wide minimum in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference between hydrodynamic cycles and biological response shows how phytoplankton integrate physical forcing into broader, fewer ecological phases.</p>
      <p id="d2e2253">A key finding of this study is the sharp contrast in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics between shallow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 m) and deep zones. Shallow coastal areas maintain relatively high Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> year-round, while deeper coastal and pelagic regions experience pronounced seasonal lows, particularly in April. This suggests that depth, rather than distance from the shore alone, is a primary control on phytoplankton biomass. Lake Tanganyika thus comprises two functionally distinct ecosystem types, likely shaped by differences in nutrient availability linked to contrasting water column mixing regimes (Van Bocxlaer et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e2277">Earlier spatially explicit studies (Bergamino et al., 2010) focused on annual primary productivity and did not resolve seasonal differences between depth-defined zones. Their identification of high-productivity areas aligns with the shallow, high-Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> clusters found here, but the seasonal and spatial patterns in shallow zones documented in this study represent a novel contribution. These previously unreported dynamics may have important implications for nutrient cycling, energy flow, and overall ecosystem functioning.</p>
      <p id="d2e2288">Long-term trends further highlight these depth-dependent differences. Pelagic waters, with pronounced seasonal minima, show declining annual median Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, in line with earlier reports of reduced primary productivity due to climate-driven water column stabilization (Bergamino et al., 2010; O'Reilly et al., 2003). At the same time, seasonal trend analysis reveals increasing peak values during the productive season, suggesting that episodic bloom events may be intensifying, as supported by yearly quantile analysis. Shallow coastal zones, in contrast, remain productive year-round and show consistent increases across all seasons. This divergence between average and extreme values underscores the influence of depth-dependent seasonal dynamics on long-term trends and highlights the complex responses of phytoplankton to environmental forcing.</p>
      <p id="d2e2298">Ecologically, these contrasting trajectories carry important implications. In pelagic waters, declining productivity could reduce energy transfer to higher trophic levels and contribute to lower fish yields. Shallow zones, on the other hand, display dynamic seasonal patterns not previously documented, indicating active processes that could affect nutrient cycling, food web interactions, and ecosystem resilience. Together, these results show that Lake Tanganyika cannot be treated as a uniform system; depth-specific processes must be considered when assessing ecological status and predicting responses to environmental change.</p>
      <p id="d2e2301">Finally, while satellite data provide a unique lake-wide view, algorithm performance can vary depending on water conditions (e.g., shallow or turbid areas) and the sensor used, and long-term in situ validation remains limited, primarily due to substantial spatial mismatches between point-based field measurements and satellite observations, compounded by sparse coverage, temporal gaps, and methodological variability. These limitations mean that small trends, particularly in pelagic waters, should be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, the contrasting seasonal and long-term dynamics between deep pelagic and shallow coastal zones are consistently observed across years and spatial clusters, supporting the robustness of the main patterns reported here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e2313">This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the seasonality and long-term trends in surface chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations across Lake Tanganyika over the past two decades. Our findings highlight the distinct seasonal dynamics of Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, driven by the lake's hydrodynamic processes and regional variations in environmental conditions. The analysis confirms that shallow areas exhibit persistently high Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations year-round, whereas pelagic regions show strong seasonal variability, with peak productivity following wind-driven mixing events.</p>
      <p id="d2e2344">The long-term trends reveal a complex duality in the lake's ecological evolution. While deep waters are experiencing a general decline in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, consistent with previous predictions of reduced primary productivity linked to climate-driven stratification, shallow coastal areas display increasing trends. Notably, in deep areas, while overall concentrations are decreasing, the highest yearly values are showing positive trends, suggesting an increase in extreme Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> events. These shifts could have cascading effects throughout the lake's trophic network, potentially altering food web dynamics and ecosystem stability.</p>
      <p id="d2e2361">The observed changes in Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> underscore the need for further research into the underlying mechanisms driving these changes. A better understanding of how climate variability, nutrient dynamics, and anthropogenic pressures interact to shape the lake's phytoplankton biomass is crucial. Additionally, assessing the cascading effects on zooplankton and fish populations will be essential for developing effective conservation and management strategies. Given the lake's critical role in supporting surrounding populations, continued monitoring efforts using remote sensing and in situ observations are necessary to guide sustainable resource management in the face of ongoing environmental change.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e2375">All data used in this article originate from the freely accessible ESA Lakes_cci dataset (version 2.1) (Carrea et al., 2024).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e2378">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2543-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2543-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e2387">FT, AA, and MV conceptualized the research paper and developed the methodology; FT processed the data, performed statistical analysis and designed the figures; FT wrote the original draft; AA and MV supervised the work and reviewed and edited the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e2393">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e2402">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e2408">Generative AI tools were used for sentence rephrasing and programming assistance.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e2413">This paper was edited by Giuliano Di Baldassarre and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adrian, R., O'Reilly, C. M., Zagarese, H., Baines, S. B., Hessen, D. O., Keller, W., Livingstone, D. M., Sommaruga, R., Straile, D., Van Donk, E., Weyhenmeyer, G. A., and Winder, M.: Lakes as sentinels of climate change, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2283–2297, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2283" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2283</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alvera-Azcárate, A., Barth, A., Rixen, M., and Beckers, J. M.: Reconstruction of incomplete oceanographic data sets using empirical orthogonal functions: Application to the Adriatic Sea surface temperature, Ocean Model., 9, 325–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Beckers, J. M. and Rixen, M.: EOF Calculations and Data Filling from Incomplete Oceanographic Datasets, J Atmos Ocean Technol, 20, 1839–1856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;1839:ECADFF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;1839:ECADFF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bergamino, N., Loiselle, S. A., Cózar, A., Dattilo, A. M., Bracchini, L., and Rossi, C.: Examining the dynamics of phytoplankton biomass in Lake Tanganyika using Empirical Orthogonal Functions, Ecol. Modell., 204, 156–162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.031</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bergamino, N., Horion, S., Stenuite, S., Cornet, Y., Loiselle, S., Plisnier, P. D., and Descy, J. P.: Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton and primary production in Lake Tanganyika using a MODIS based bio-optical time series, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 772–780, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.013</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Brönmark, C. and Hansson, L. A.: Environmental issues in lakes and ponds: Current state and perspectives, Environ. Conserv., 29, 290–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0376892902000218</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bulengela, G.: “I am a Fisher”: Identity and livelihood diversification in Lake Tanganyika Fisheries, Tanzania, Mar. Technol. Res., 6, 268718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.268718" ext-link-type="DOI">10.33175/mtr.2024.268718</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Carrea, L., Crétaux, J. F., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Bergé-Nguyen, M., Calmettes, B., Duguay, C. R., Jiang, D., Merchant, C. J., Mueller, D., Selmes, N., Simis, S., Spyrakos, E., Stelzer, K., Warren, M., Yesou, H., and Zhang, D.: ESA Lakes Climate Change Initiative (Lakes_cci): Lake products, Version 2.1., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01889-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-022-01889-z</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Cohen, A. S., Gergurich, E. L., Kraemer, B. M., McGlue, M. M., McIntyre, P. B., Russell, J. M., Simmons, J. D., and Swarzenski, P. W.: Climate warming reduces fish production and benthic habitat in Lake Tanganyika, one of the most biodiverse freshwater ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 9563–9568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603237113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1603237113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Corman, J. R., Mcintyre, P. B., Kuboja, B., Mbemba, W., Fink, D., Wheeler, C. W., Gans, C., Michel, E., and Flecker, A. S.: Upwelling couples chemical and biological dynamics across the littoral and pelagic zones of Lake Tanganyika, East Africa, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1, 214–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0214" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0214</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Coulter, G. W.: Lake Tanganyika and its life, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, ISBN 0-19-858525X, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Descy, J. P., Hardy, M. A., Sténuite, S., Pirlot, S., Leporcq, B., Kimirei, I., Sekadende, B., Mwaitega, S. R., and Sinyenza, D.: Phytoplankton pigments and community composition in Lake Tanganyika, Freshw. Biol., 50, 668–684, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x</ext-link>, April 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Descy, J. P., Tarbe, A. L., Stenuite, S., Pirlot, S., Stimart, J., Vanderheyden, J., Leporcq, B., Stoyneva, M. P., Kimirei, I., Sinyinza, D., and Plisnier, P. D.: Drivers of phytoplankton diversity in Lake Tanganyika, Hydrobiologia, 653, 29–44, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0343-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10750-010-0343-3</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Gbetkom, P. G., Crétaux, J. F., Biancamaria, S., Blazquez, A., Paris, A., Tchilibou, M., Gal, L., Kitambo, B., Jucá Oliveira, R. A., and Gosset, M.: Lake Tanganyika basin water storage variations from 2003–2021 for water balance and flood monitoring, Remote Sens. Appl., 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, H. R. and Wang, M.: Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm, Appl. Opt., 33, 443–452, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.000443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.33.000443</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Hecky, R. E. and Fee, E. J.: Primary production and rates of algal growth in Lake Tanganyika, Limnol. Oceanogr., 26, 532–547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0532" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0532</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hecky, R. E. and Kling, I.-I. J.: The phytoplankton and protozooplankton of the euphotic zone of Lake Tanganyika: Species composition, biomass, chlorophyll content, and spatio-temporal distribution, Limnol. Oceanogr., 26, 548–564, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0548</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Horion, S., Bergamino, N., Stenuite, S., Descy, J.-P., Plisnier, P.-D., Loiselle, S. A., and Cornet, Y.: Optimized extraction of daily bio-optical time series derived from MODIS/Aqua imagery for Lake Tanganyika, Africa, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 781–791, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.012</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hu, C. and Campbell, J.: Oceanic Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> Content, in: Biophysical Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing, edited by: Hanes, J., Springer, 171–203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25047-7_7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-25047-7_7</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Kraemer, B. M., Hook, S., Huttula, T., Kotilainen, P., O'Reilly, C. M., Peltonen, A., Plisnier, P. D., Sarvala, J., Tamatamah, R., Vadeboncoeur, Y., Wehrli, B., and McIntyre, P. B.: Century-long warming trends in the upper water column of lake tanganyika, PLoS One, 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1371/journal.pone.0132490</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Kutser, T.: Passive optical remote sensing of cyanobacteria and other intense phytoplankton blooms in coastal and inland waters, Int. J. Remote Sens., 30, 4401–4425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802562305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431160802562305</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Laliberté, J. and Larouche, P.: Chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration climatology, phenology, and trends in the optically complex waters of the St. Lawrence Estuary and Gulf, J. Mar. Syst., 238, 103830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2022.103830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2022.103830</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Langenberg, V. T., Mwape, L. M., Tshibangu, K., Tumba, J. M., Koelmans, A. A., Roijackers, R., Salonen, K., Sarvala, J., and Mölsä, H.: Comparison of thermal stratification, light attenuation, and chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamics between the ends of Lake Tanganyika, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 5, 255–265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031956" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14634980290031956</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Langenberg, V. T., Sarvala, J., and Roijackers, R.: Effect of wind induced water movements on nutrients, chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and primary production in Lake Tanganyika, Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag., 6, 279–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301488" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14634980301488</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Lombard, F., Boss, E., Waite, A. M., Uitz, J., Stemmann, L., Sosik, H. M., Schulz, J., Romagnan, J. B., Picheral, M., Pearlman, J., Ohman, M. D., Niehoff, B., Möller, K. O., Miloslavich, P., Lara-Lopez, A., Kudela, R. M., Lopes, R. M., Karp-Boss, L., Kiko, R., Jaffe, J. S., Iversen, M. H., Irisson, J. O., Hauss, H., Guidi, L., Gorsky, G., Giering, S. L. C., Gaube, P., Gallager, S., Dubelaar, G., Cowen, R. K., Carlotti, F., Briseño-Avena, C., Berline, L., Benoit-Bird, K. J., Bax, N. J., Batten, S. D., Ayata, S. D., and Appeltans, W.: Globally consistent quantitative observations of planktonic ecosystems, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2019.00196</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Macintyre, S.: Climatic Variability, Mixing Dynamics, and Ecological Consequences in the African Great Lakes, in: Climatic Change and Global Warming of Inland Waters: Impacts and Mitigation for Ecosystems and Societies, edited by: Charles R. Goldman, Michio Kumagai, and Richard D. Robarts, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 311–336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118470596.ch18" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781118470596.ch18</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, 281–297, <uri>https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512992</uri> (last access: 28 April 2026), 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Martin, Seelye.: An introduction to ocean remote sensing, Cambridge University Press, 496 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781139094368</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>McClain, C. R., Hooker, S., Feldman, G., and Bontempi, P.: Satellite Data for Ocean Biology, Biogeochemistry, and Climate Research, Eos,  87, 337–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024310</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Mölsä, H., Sarvala, J., Badende, S., Chitamwebwa, D., Kanyaru, R., Mulimbwa, M., and Mwape, L.: Ecosystem monitoring in the development of sustainable fisheries in Lake Tanganyika, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 5, 267–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031965" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14634980290031965</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Moore, T. S., Dowell, M. D., Bradt, S., and Ruiz Verdu, A.: An optical water type framework for selecting and blending retrievals from bio-optical algorithms in lakes and coastal waters, Remote Sens. Environ., 143, 97–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Moses, W. J., Gitelson, A. A., Berdnikov, S., and Povazhnyy, V.: Estimation of chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in case II waters using MODIS and MERIS data - Successes and challenges, Environ. Res. Lett, 4, 045005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045005</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Naithani, J., Deleersnijder, E., and Plisnier, P. D.: Origin of intraseasonal variability in Lake Tanganyika, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015843" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015843</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Neil, C., Spyrakos, E., Hunter, P. D., and Tyler, A. N.: A global approach for chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval across optically complex inland waters based on optical water types, Remote Sens. Environ., 229, 159–178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.027</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Nicholson, S. E.: The nature of rainfall variability over Africa on time scales of decades to millenia, Glob. Planet Chang., 26, 137–158, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00040-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00040-0</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Niyongabo, A., Zhang, D., Guan, Y., Wang, Z., Imran, M., Nicayenzi, B., Guyasa, A. K., and Hatungimana, P.: Predicting Urban Water Consumption and Health Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Tanganyika Lake, East Africa, Water, 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131793" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w16131793</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>O'Reilly, C. M., Alin, S. R., Piisnier, P. D., Cohen, A. S., and McKee, B. A.: Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake Tanganyika, Africa, Nature, 424, 766–768, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01833" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature01833</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Paffen, P., Coenen, E., Bambara, S., Wa Bazolana, M., Lyimo, E., and Lukwesa, C.: Synthesis of the 1995 simultaneous frame survey of Lake Tanganyika fisheries, FAO/FINNIDA Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika, GCP/RAF/271/FIN–TD/60 (En), 22 pp., <uri>https://www.fao.org/fishery/static/LTR/FTP/TD60.PDF</uri> (last access: 28 April 2026), 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Papa, F., Crétaux, J. F., Grippa, M., Robert, E., Trigg, M., Tshimanga, R. M., Kitambo, B., Paris, A., Carr, A., Fleischmann, A. S., de Fleury, M., Gbetkom, P. G., Calmettes, B., and Calmant, S.: Water Resources in Africa under Global Change: Monitoring Surface Waters from Space, Surv. Geophys., 44, 43–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P.-D. and Coenen, E. J.: Pulsed and Dampened Annual Limnological Fluctuations in Lake Tanganyika, in: The Great Lakes of the World (GLOW), edited by: Munawar, M. and Hecky, R. E., Michigan State University Press, 8396, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctt1bqzmb5.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.14321/j.ctt1bqzmb5.11</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P.-D., Poncelet, N., Cocquyt, C., De Boeck, H., Bompangue, D., Naithani, J., Jacobs, J., Piarroux, R., Moore, S., Giraudoux, P., Batumbo, D., Mushagalusa, D., Makasa, L., Deleersnijder, E., Tomazic, I., and Cornet, Y.: Cholera outbreaks at Lake Tanganyika induced by climate change? – “CHOLTIC”, final report, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, 117 pp., <uri>https://www.belspo.be/belspo/SSD/science/Reports/CHOLTIC_FinRep.pdf</uri> (last access: 28 April 2026), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P., Nshombo, M., Mgana, H., and Ntakimazi, G.: Monitoring climate change and anthropogenic pressure at Lake Tanganyika, J. Great Lakes Res., 44, 1194–1208, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.05.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jglr.2018.05.019</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P., Kayanda, R., MacIntyre, S., Obiero, K., Okello, W., Vodacek, A., Cocquyt, C., Abegaz, H., Achieng, A., Akonkwa, B., Albrecht, C., Balagizi, C., Barasa, J., Abel Bashonga, R., Bashonga Bishobibiri, A., Bootsma, H., Borges, A. V., Chavula, G., Dadi, T., De Keyzer, E. L. R., Doran, P. J., Gabagambi, N., Gatare, R., Gemmell, A., Getahun, A., Haambiya, L. H., Higgins, S. N., Hyangya, B. L., Irvine, K., Isumbisho, M., Jonasse, C., Katongo, C., Katsev, S., Keyombe, J., Kimirei, I., Kisekelwa, T., Kishe, M., Otoung A. Koding, S., Kolding, J., Kraemer, B. M., Limbu, P., Lomodei, E., Mahongo, S. B., Malala, J., Mbabazi, S., Masilya, P. M., McCandless, M., Medard, M., Migeni Ajode, Z., Mrosso, H. D., Mudakikwa, E. R., Mulimbwa, N., Mushagalusa, D., Muvundja, F. A., Nankabirwa, A., Nahimana, D., Ngatunga, B. P., Ngochera, M., Nicholson, S., Nshombo, M., Ntakimazi, G., Nyamweya, C., Ikwaput Nyeko, J., Olago, D., Olbamo, T., O'Reilly, C. M., Pasche, N., Phiri, H., Raasakka, N., Salyani, A., Sibomana, C., Silsbe, G. M., Smith, S., Sterner, R. W., Thiery, W., Tuyisenge, J., Van der Knaap, M., Van Steenberge, M., van Zwieten, P. A. M., Verheyen, E., Wakjira, M., Walakira, J., Ndeo Wembo, O., and Lawrence, T.: Need for harmonized long-term multi-lake monitoring of African Great Lakes, J. Great Lakes Res., 49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.016</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P., Cocquyt, C., Cornet, Y., Poncelet, N., Nshombo, M., Ntakimazi, G., Nahimana, D., Makasa, L., and MacIntyre, S.: Phytoplankton blooms and fish kills in Lake Tanganyika related to upwelling and the limnological cycle, J. Great Lakes Res., 49, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102247</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Plisnier, P.-D., Chitamwebwa, D., Mwape, L., Tshibangu, K., Langenberg, V., and Coenen, E.: Limnological annual cycle inferred from physical-chemical fluctuations at three stations of Lake Tanganyika, Hydrobiologia, 407, 45–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762119873" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1003762119873</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Rousseeuw, P. J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Salonen, K., Sarvala, J., Järvinen, M., Langenberg, V., Nuottajärvi, M., Vuorio, K., and Chitamwebwa, and D. B. R.: Phytoplankton in Lake Tanganyika-vertical and horizontal distribution of in vivo fluorescence, Hydrobiologia, 407, 89–103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764825808" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1003764825808</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</ext-link>, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Stenuite, S., Pirlot, S., Hardy, M. A., Sarmento, H., Tarbe, A. L., Leporcq, B., and Descy, J. P.: Phytoplankton production and growth rate in Lake Tanganyika: Evidence of a decline in primary productivity in recent decades, Freshw. Biol., 52, 2226–2239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01829.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01829.x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Tierney, J. E., Mayes, M. T., Meyer, N., Johnson, C., Swarzenski, P. W., Cohen, A. S., and Russell, J. M.: Late-twentieth-century warming in Lake Tanganyika unprecedented since AD 500, Nat. Geosci., 3, 422–425, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo865</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Van Bocxlaer, B., Schultheiß, R., Plisnier, P. D., and Albrecht, C.: Does the decline of gastropods in deep water herald ecosystem change in Lakes Malawi and Tanganyika?, Freshw. Biol., 57, 1733–1744, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02828.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02828.x</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Verburg, P. and Hecky, R. E.: The physics of the warming of Lake Tanganyika by climate change, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2418–2430, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2418" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2418</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Verburg, P., Hecky, R. E., and Kling, H.: Ecological consequences of a century of warming in Lake Tanganyika, Science, 301, 505–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084846" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1084846</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Vuorio, K., Nuottajärvi, M., Salonen, K., and Sarvala, J.: Spatial distribution of phytoplankton and picocyanobacteria in Lake Tanganyika in March and April 1998, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 6, 263–278, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301494" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14634980301494</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Wetzel, R. G.: Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, Third Edition., Academic Press, San Diego, 1006 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02112-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/C2009-0-02112-6</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Williamson, C. E., Saros, J. E., Vincent, W. F., and Smol, J. P.: Lakes and reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2273–2282, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2273</ext-link>, 2009. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Xu, F.-L., Tao, S., Dawson, R. W., Li, P.-G., and Cao, J.: Lake Ecosystem Health Assessment: Indicators and Methods, Water Res., 35, 3157–3167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00040-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00040-9</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Leveraging 20 years of remote sensing to characterize surface phytoplankton seasonality and long-term trends in lake Tanganyika</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adrian, R., O'Reilly, C. M., Zagarese, H., Baines, S. B., Hessen, D. O.,
Keller, W., Livingstone, D. M., Sommaruga, R., Straile, D., Van Donk, E.,
Weyhenmeyer, G. A., and Winder, M.: Lakes as sentinels of climate change,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2283–2297, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2283" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2283</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alvera-Azcárate, A., Barth, A., Rixen, M., and Beckers, J. M.:
Reconstruction of incomplete oceanographic data sets using empirical
orthogonal functions: Application to the Adriatic Sea surface temperature,
Ocean Model., 9, 325–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.001</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beckers, J. M. and Rixen, M.: EOF Calculations and Data Filling from
Incomplete Oceanographic Datasets, J Atmos Ocean Technol, 20, 1839–1856,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;1839:ECADFF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020&lt;1839:ECADFF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergamino, N., Loiselle, S. A., Cózar, A., Dattilo, A. M., Bracchini,
L., and Rossi, C.: Examining the dynamics of phytoplankton biomass in Lake
Tanganyika using Empirical Orthogonal Functions, Ecol. Modell., 204, 156–162,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.031</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergamino, N., Horion, S., Stenuite, S., Cornet, Y., Loiselle, S., Plisnier,
P. D., and Descy, J. P.: Spatio-temporal dynamics of phytoplankton and
primary production in Lake Tanganyika using a MODIS based bio-optical time
series, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 772–780, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.013</a>,
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brönmark, C. and Hansson, L. A.: Environmental issues in lakes and
ponds: Current state and perspectives, Environ. Conserv., 29, 290–307,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000218</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bulengela, G.: “I am a Fisher”: Identity and livelihood diversification in
Lake Tanganyika Fisheries, Tanzania, Mar. Technol. Res., 6,
268718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.268718" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2024.268718</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carrea, L., Crétaux, J. F., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Bergé-Nguyen, M.,
Calmettes, B., Duguay, C. R., Jiang, D., Merchant, C. J., Mueller, D.,
Selmes, N., Simis, S., Spyrakos, E., Stelzer, K., Warren, M., Yesou, H., and
Zhang, D.: ESA Lakes Climate Change Initiative (Lakes_cci):
Lake products, Version 2.1., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01889-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01889-z</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cohen, A. S., Gergurich, E. L., Kraemer, B. M., McGlue, M. M., McIntyre, P.
B., Russell, J. M., Simmons, J. D., and Swarzenski, P. W.: Climate warming
reduces fish production and benthic habitat in Lake Tanganyika, one of the
most biodiverse freshwater ecosystems, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
9563–9568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603237113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603237113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Corman, J. R., Mcintyre, P. B., Kuboja, B., Mbemba, W., Fink, D., Wheeler,
C. W., Gans, C., Michel, E., and Flecker, A. S.: Upwelling couples chemical
and biological dynamics across the littoral and pelagic zones of Lake
Tanganyika, East Africa, Limnol. Oceanogr., 1, 214–224,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0214" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0214</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coulter, G. W.: Lake Tanganyika and its life, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, UK, ISBN 0-19-858525X, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Descy, J. P., Hardy, M. A., Sténuite, S., Pirlot, S., Leporcq, B.,
Kimirei, I., Sekadende, B., Mwaitega, S. R., and Sinyenza, D.: Phytoplankton
pigments and community composition in Lake Tanganyika, Freshw. Biol., 50,
668–684, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01358.x</a>, April 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Descy, J. P., Tarbe, A. L., Stenuite, S., Pirlot, S., Stimart, J.,
Vanderheyden, J., Leporcq, B., Stoyneva, M. P., Kimirei, I., Sinyinza, D.,
and Plisnier, P. D.: Drivers of phytoplankton diversity in Lake Tanganyika,
Hydrobiologia, 653, 29–44, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0343-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-010-0343-3</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gbetkom, P. G., Crétaux, J. F., Biancamaria, S., Blazquez, A., Paris,
A., Tchilibou, M., Gal, L., Kitambo, B., Jucá Oliveira, R. A., and
Gosset, M.: Lake Tanganyika basin water storage variations from 2003–2021
for water balance and flood monitoring, Remote Sens. Appl., 34,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101182</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gordon, H. R. and Wang, M.: Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol
optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm,
Appl. Opt., 33, 443–452, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.000443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.000443</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hecky, R. E. and Fee, E. J.: Primary production and rates of algal growth in
Lake Tanganyika, Limnol. Oceanogr., 26, 532–547,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0532" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0532</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hecky, R. E. and Kling, I.-I. J.: The phytoplankton and protozooplankton of
the euphotic zone of Lake Tanganyika: Species composition, biomass,
chlorophyll content, and spatio-temporal distribution, Limnol. Oceanogr., 26,
548–564, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1981.26.3.0548</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Horion, S., Bergamino, N., Stenuite, S., Descy, J.-P., Plisnier, P.-D., Loiselle, S. A., and Cornet, Y.: Optimized extraction of daily bio-optical time series derived from MODIS/Aqua imagery for Lake Tanganyika, Africa, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 781–791, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.012</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, C. and Campbell, J.: Oceanic Chlorophyll <i>a</i> Content, in: Biophysical
Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing, edited by: Hanes, J., Springer,
171–203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25047-7_7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25047-7_7</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kraemer, B. M., Hook, S., Huttula, T., Kotilainen, P., O'Reilly, C. M.,
Peltonen, A., Plisnier, P. D., Sarvala, J., Tamatamah, R., Vadeboncoeur, Y.,
Wehrli, B., and McIntyre, P. B.: Century-long warming trends in the upper
water column of lake tanganyika, PLoS One, 10,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132490</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kutser, T.: Passive optical remote sensing of cyanobacteria and other
intense phytoplankton blooms in coastal and inland waters, Int. J. Remote
Sens., 30, 4401–4425, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802562305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802562305</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laliberté, J. and Larouche, P.: Chlorophyll <i>a</i> concentration climatology,
phenology, and trends in the optically complex waters of the St. Lawrence
Estuary and Gulf, J. Mar. Syst., 238, 103830,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2022.103830" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2022.103830</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Langenberg, V. T., Mwape, L. M., Tshibangu, K., Tumba, J. M., Koelmans, A.
A., Roijackers, R., Salonen, K., Sarvala, J., and Mölsä, H.:
Comparison of thermal stratification, light attenuation, and chlorophyll <i>a</i>
dynamics between the ends of Lake Tanganyika, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 5,
255–265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031956" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031956</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Langenberg, V. T., Sarvala, J., and Roijackers, R.: Effect of wind induced
water movements on nutrients, chlorophyll <i>a</i>, and primary production in Lake
Tanganyika, Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag., 6, 279–288,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301488" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301488</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lombard, F., Boss, E., Waite, A. M., Uitz, J., Stemmann, L., Sosik, H. M.,
Schulz, J., Romagnan, J. B., Picheral, M., Pearlman, J., Ohman, M. D.,
Niehoff, B., Möller, K. O., Miloslavich, P., Lara-Lopez, A., Kudela, R.
M., Lopes, R. M., Karp-Boss, L., Kiko, R., Jaffe, J. S., Iversen, M. H.,
Irisson, J. O., Hauss, H., Guidi, L., Gorsky, G., Giering, S. L. C., Gaube,
P., Gallager, S., Dubelaar, G., Cowen, R. K., Carlotti, F.,
Briseño-Avena, C., Berline, L., Benoit-Bird, K. J., Bax, N. J., Batten,
S. D., Ayata, S. D., and Appeltans, W.: Globally consistent quantitative
observations of planktonic ecosystems, Front. Mar. Sci., 6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00196</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Macintyre, S.: Climatic Variability, Mixing Dynamics, and Ecological
Consequences in the African Great Lakes, in: Climatic Change and Global
Warming of Inland Waters: Impacts and Mitigation for Ecosystems and
Societies, edited by: Charles R. Goldman, Michio Kumagai, and Richard D.
Robarts, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 311–336,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118470596.ch18" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118470596.ch18</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, 281–297, <a href="https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512992" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 April 2026), 1967.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Martin, Seelye.: An introduction to ocean remote sensing, Cambridge
University Press, 496 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094368</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
McClain, C. R., Hooker, S., Feldman, G., and Bontempi, P.: Satellite Data
for Ocean Biology, Biogeochemistry, and Climate Research, Eos,  87, 337–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024310" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024310</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mölsä, H., Sarvala, J., Badende, S., Chitamwebwa, D., Kanyaru, R.,
Mulimbwa, M., and Mwape, L.: Ecosystem monitoring in the development of
sustainable fisheries in Lake Tanganyika, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 5,
267–281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031965" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290031965</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moore, T. S., Dowell, M. D., Bradt, S., and Ruiz Verdu, A.: An optical water
type framework for selecting and blending retrievals from bio-optical
algorithms in lakes and coastal waters, Remote Sens. Environ., 143, 97–111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.021</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moses, W. J., Gitelson, A. A., Berdnikov, S., and Povazhnyy, V.: Estimation
of chlorophyll <i>a</i> concentration in case II waters using MODIS and MERIS data
- Successes and challenges, Environ. Res. Lett, 4, 045005,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045005</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Naithani, J., Deleersnijder, E., and Plisnier, P. D.: Origin of
intraseasonal variability in Lake Tanganyika, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015843" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015843</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neil, C., Spyrakos, E., Hunter, P. D., and Tyler, A. N.: A global approach
for chlorophyll <i>a</i> retrieval across optically complex inland waters based on
optical water types, Remote Sens. Environ., 229, 159–178,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.027</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nicholson, S. E.: The nature of rainfall variability over Africa on time
scales of decades to millenia, Glob. Planet Chang., 26, 137–158,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00040-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(00)00040-0</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Niyongabo, A., Zhang, D., Guan, Y., Wang, Z., Imran, M., Nicayenzi, B.,
Guyasa, A. K., and Hatungimana, P.: Predicting Urban Water Consumption and
Health Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Tanganyika Lake, East
Africa, Water, 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131793" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131793</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Reilly, C. M., Alin, S. R., Piisnier, P. D., Cohen, A. S., and McKee, B.
A.: Climate change decreases aquatic ecosystem productivity of Lake
Tanganyika, Africa, Nature, 424, 766–768, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01833" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01833</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paffen, P., Coenen, E., Bambara, S., Wa Bazolana, M., Lyimo, E., and Lukwesa, C.: Synthesis of the 1995 simultaneous frame survey of Lake Tanganyika fisheries, FAO/FINNIDA Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika, GCP/RAF/271/FIN–TD/60 (En), 22 pp., <a href="https://www.fao.org/fishery/static/LTR/FTP/TD60.PDF" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 April 2026), 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Papa, F., Crétaux, J. F., Grippa, M., Robert, E., Trigg, M., Tshimanga,
R. M., Kitambo, B., Paris, A., Carr, A., Fleischmann, A. S., de Fleury, M.,
Gbetkom, P. G., Calmettes, B., and Calmant, S.: Water Resources in Africa
under Global Change: Monitoring Surface Waters from Space, Surv. Geophys., 44,
43–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-022-09700-9</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P.-D. and Coenen, E. J.: Pulsed and Dampened Annual Limnological
Fluctuations in Lake Tanganyika, in: The Great Lakes of the World (GLOW),
edited by: Munawar, M. and Hecky, R. E., Michigan State University Press,
8396, <a href="https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctt1bqzmb5.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctt1bqzmb5.11</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P.-D., Poncelet, N., Cocquyt, C., De Boeck, H., Bompangue, D., Naithani, J., Jacobs, J., Piarroux, R., Moore, S., Giraudoux, P., Batumbo, D., Mushagalusa, D., Makasa, L., Deleersnijder, E., Tomazic, I., and Cornet, Y.: Cholera outbreaks at Lake Tanganyika induced by climate change? – “CHOLTIC”, final report, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, 117 pp., <a href="https://www.belspo.be/belspo/SSD/science/Reports/CHOLTIC_FinRep.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 April 2026), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P., Nshombo, M., Mgana, H., and Ntakimazi, G.: Monitoring climate
change and anthropogenic pressure at Lake Tanganyika, J. Great Lakes Res., 44,
1194–1208, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.05.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.05.019</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P., Kayanda, R., MacIntyre, S., Obiero, K., Okello, W., Vodacek,
A., Cocquyt, C., Abegaz, H., Achieng, A., Akonkwa, B., Albrecht, C.,
Balagizi, C., Barasa, J., Abel Bashonga, R., Bashonga Bishobibiri, A.,
Bootsma, H., Borges, A. V., Chavula, G., Dadi, T., De Keyzer, E. L. R.,
Doran, P. J., Gabagambi, N., Gatare, R., Gemmell, A., Getahun, A., Haambiya,
L. H., Higgins, S. N., Hyangya, B. L., Irvine, K., Isumbisho, M., Jonasse,
C., Katongo, C., Katsev, S., Keyombe, J., Kimirei, I., Kisekelwa, T., Kishe,
M., Otoung A. Koding, S., Kolding, J., Kraemer, B. M., Limbu, P., Lomodei,
E., Mahongo, S. B., Malala, J., Mbabazi, S., Masilya, P. M., McCandless, M.,
Medard, M., Migeni Ajode, Z., Mrosso, H. D., Mudakikwa, E. R., Mulimbwa, N.,
Mushagalusa, D., Muvundja, F. A., Nankabirwa, A., Nahimana, D., Ngatunga, B.
P., Ngochera, M., Nicholson, S., Nshombo, M., Ntakimazi, G., Nyamweya, C.,
Ikwaput Nyeko, J., Olago, D., Olbamo, T., O'Reilly, C. M., Pasche, N.,
Phiri, H., Raasakka, N., Salyani, A., Sibomana, C., Silsbe, G. M., Smith,
S., Sterner, R. W., Thiery, W., Tuyisenge, J., Van der Knaap, M., Van
Steenberge, M., van Zwieten, P. A. M., Verheyen, E., Wakjira, M., Walakira,
J., Ndeo Wembo, O., and Lawrence, T.: Need for harmonized long-term
multi-lake monitoring of African Great Lakes, J. Great Lakes Res., 49,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.01.016</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P., Cocquyt, C., Cornet, Y., Poncelet, N., Nshombo, M., Ntakimazi,
G., Nahimana, D., Makasa, L., and MacIntyre, S.: Phytoplankton blooms and
fish kills in Lake Tanganyika related to upwelling and the limnological
cycle, J. Great Lakes Res., 49, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2023.102247</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Plisnier, P.-D., Chitamwebwa, D., Mwape, L., Tshibangu, K., Langenberg, V.,
and Coenen, E.: Limnological annual cycle inferred from physical-chemical
fluctuations at three stations of Lake Tanganyika, Hydrobiologia, 407,
45–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762119873" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003762119873</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rousseeuw, P. J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and
validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salonen, K., Sarvala, J., Järvinen, M., Langenberg, V., Nuottajärvi,
M., Vuorio, K., and Chitamwebwa, and D. B. R.: Phytoplankton in Lake
Tanganyika-vertical and horizontal distribution of in vivo fluorescence,
Hydrobiologia, 407, 89–103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764825808" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764825808</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau,
J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934</a>, 1968.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stenuite, S., Pirlot, S., Hardy, M. A., Sarmento, H., Tarbe, A. L., Leporcq,
B., and Descy, J. P.: Phytoplankton production and growth rate in Lake
Tanganyika: Evidence of a decline in primary productivity in recent decades,
Freshw. Biol., 52, 2226–2239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01829.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01829.x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tierney, J. E., Mayes, M. T., Meyer, N., Johnson, C., Swarzenski, P. W.,
Cohen, A. S., and Russell, J. M.: Late-twentieth-century warming in Lake
Tanganyika unprecedented since AD 500, Nat. Geosci., 3, 422–425,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo865</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Bocxlaer, B., Schultheiß, R., Plisnier, P. D., and Albrecht, C.:
Does the decline of gastropods in deep water herald ecosystem change in
Lakes Malawi and Tanganyika?, Freshw. Biol., 57, 1733–1744,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02828.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02828.x</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Verburg, P. and Hecky, R. E.: The physics of the warming of Lake Tanganyika
by climate change, Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2418–2430,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2418" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2418</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Verburg, P., Hecky, R. E., and Kling, H.: Ecological consequences of a
century of warming in Lake Tanganyika, Science, 301, 505–507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084846" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1084846</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vuorio, K., Nuottajärvi, M., Salonen, K., and Sarvala, J.: Spatial
distribution of phytoplankton and picocyanobacteria in Lake Tanganyika in
March and April 1998, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health Manag., 6, 263–278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301494" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980301494</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wetzel, R. G.: Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, Third Edition.,
Academic Press, San Diego, 1006 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02112-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-02112-6</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williamson, C. E., Saros, J. E., Vincent, W. F., and Smol, J. P.: Lakes and
reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change,
Limnol. Oceanogr., 54, 2273–2282, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2273" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2273</a>, 2009.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, F.-L., Tao, S., Dawson, R. W., Li, P.-G., and Cao, J.: Lake Ecosystem
Health Assessment: Indicators and Methods, Water Res., 35, 3157–3167,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00040-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00040-9</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
