Articles | Volume 3, issue 1
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 55–69, 1999
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-3-55-1999

Special issue: The TIGER Programme

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 3, 55–69, 1999
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-3-55-1999

  31 Mar 1999

31 Mar 1999

The sensitivity of stand-scale photosynthesis and transpiration to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration and climate

B. Kruijt, C. Barton, A. Rey, and P. G. Jarvis B. Kruijt et al.
  • Institute of Ecology and Resource Management, Darwin Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JU, UK
  • Tel. +44 131 650 5427, Fax. +44 131 662 0478, Email: b.kruijt@ed.ac.uk

Abstract. The 3-dimensional forest model MAESTRO was used to simulate daily and annual photosynthesis and transpiration fluxes of forest stands and the sensitivity of these fluxes to potential changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]), temperature, water stress and phenology. The effects of possible feed-backs from increased leaf area and limitations to leaf nutrition were simulated by imposing changes in leaf area and nitrogen content. Two different tree species were considered: Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr., a conifer with long needle longevity and large leaf area, and Betula pendula Roth., a broad-leaved deciduous species with an open canopy and small leaf area.
Canopy photosynthetic production in trees was predicted to increase with atmospheric [CO2] and length of the growing season and to decrease with increased water stress. Associated increases in leaf area increased production further only in the B. pendula canopy, where the original leaf area was relatively small. Assumed limitations in N uptake affected B. pendula more than P. sitchensis. The effect of increased temperature was shown to depend on leaf area and nitrogen content. The different sensitivities of the two species were related to their very different canopy structure. Increased [CO2] reduced transpiration, but larger leaf area, early leaf growth, and higher temperature all led to increased water use. These effects were limited by feedbacks from soil water stress. The simulations suggest that, with the projected climate change, there is some increase in stand annual `water use efficiency', but the actual water losses to the atmosphere may not always decrease.

Special issue
Download