<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-26-5955-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Linking the complementary evaporation relationship with <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>the Budyko framework
for ungauged areas in Australia</article-title><alt-title>Linking the complementary evaporation relationship</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Linking the complementary evaporation relationship}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{D.~Kim et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Daeha</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>Minha</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Chun</surname><given-names>Jong Ahn</given-names></name>
          <email>jachun@apcc21.org</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-1811</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju,
Jeollabuk-do, 54896, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Water Resources, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon,
Gyeonggi-do, 16419, South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Prediction Research Department, APEC Climate Center, Busan, 48058,
South Korea</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jong Ahn Chun (jachun@apcc21.org)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>23</issue>
      <fpage>5955</fpage><lpage>5969</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>April</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>May</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>2</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Daeha Kim et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e115">While the calibration-free complementary relationship (CR) has
performed excellently in predicting terrestrial evapotranspiration
(ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, how to determine the Priestley–Taylor coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a remaining question. In this work, we evaluated this highly
utilizable method, which only requires atmospheric data, with in situ flux
observations and basin-scale water-balance estimates (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Australia, proposing how to constrain it with a traditional Budyko equation
for ungauged locations. We found that the CR method with a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transferred from fractional wet areas performed poorly in
reproducing the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in unregulated river basins, and it
underperformed advanced physical, machine-learning, and land surface models
in closing grid-scale water balance. This problem was remedied by linking
the CR method with a traditional Budyko equation that allowed for an upscaling
of the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from gauged basins to ungauged locations. The
combined CR–Budyko framework enabled us to reflect climate conditions in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to more plausible ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in ungauged
areas. The spatially varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditioned by local climates
enabled the CR method to outperform the three ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> models in reproducing the
grid-scale ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the Australian continent. We argued here that
the polynomial CR with a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could result in biased
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and it can be constrained by a traditional Budyko equation for
improvement.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e268">Evapotranspiration (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a pivotal role in water and energy
exchanges between the land and the atmosphere. On the global scale, more
than 60 % of terrestrial precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) returns to the atmosphere
through plants' vascular systems and soil pores while consuming over 70 %
of surface net radiation (Trenberth et al., 2007, 2009). Since it is tightly
coupled with carbon cycles, abnormally low ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would indicate food
insecurity and low ecosystem sustainability (Jasechko, 2018; Kyatengerwa et
al., 2020; Pareek et al., 2020; Swann et al., 2016). In severe cases,
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> limited by deficient soil moisture can lead to extreme heatwaves
that further propagate the water deficit in space and time (Miralles et al.,
2014; Mueller and Seneviratne, 2012; Schumacher et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e308">Despite great community efforts for sharing in situ observations (e.g.,
Baldocchi, 2020; Novick et al., 2018), ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gauging networks are
unevenly established over land surfaces and often subjected to error sources
(e.g., unclosed energy balance) and limited data lengths (Ma et al., 2021).
Inevitably, modeling approaches are needed to predict ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in ungauged
or poorly gauged areas or to characterize it on a long timescale in a large
area. Hence, various approaches have been proposed, including physical models
(e.g., Martens et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2016), machine-learning
techniques (e.g., Jung et al., 2019; Tramontana et al., 2016), and
conceptual land surface schemes (e.g., Guimberteau et al., 2018; Haverd et
al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e329"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Those modeling approaches typically require <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data and land surface
information (e.g., remote-sensing vegetation indices) to quantify available
soil moisture to the vaporization process. However, due in part to
uncertainty associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data (Sun et al., 2018) and model structures
(Samaniego et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019), resulting ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates
have shown substantial disparities. In the comprehensive intercomparison by
Pan et al. (2020), for example, the 14 advanced land surface models
generated the global mean ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> varying widely between 450
and 700 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Such a large incongruity in modeled ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was also
found by the earlier Global Soil Wetness Project (Schlosser and Gao, 2010),
suggesting that an alternative method is necessary to circumvent the
uncertainty sources.</p>
      <p id="d1e387">A practical method to simulate ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data and land surface
schemes is the complementary relationship (CR) of evaporation (Bouchet,
1963). It uses the evident fact that the air over a water-limited surface
amplifies its vapor pressure deficit (VPD), while this effect disappears
when the same surface is amply wet (Chen and Buchberger, 2018; Ramírez
et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2019). Based on the atmospheric self-adjustment,
numerous equations have been formulated to predict ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> only using
routine meteorological data (e.g., Anayah and Kaluarachchi, 2014; Crago and
Crowley, 2005; Crago and Qualls, 2013; Hobbins et al., 2004; Huntington et
al., 2011; Kahler and Brutsaert, 2006 among others). In particular, the
definitive derivation by Brutsaert (2015) and the following modifications
(Crago et al., 2016; Crago and Qualls, 2021; Szilagyi, 2021; Szilagyi et
al., 2017) provided strong physical foundations to the early principle of Bouchet (1963). They have excellently predicted ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at various spatial and
temporal scales (e.g., Brutsaert et al., 2017, 2020; Crago and Qualls, 2018;
Ma et al., 2019, 2021; Ma and Szilagyi, 2019) and allowed users to assess
vegetation droughts over national and continental areas (e.g., Kim et al.,
2019, 2021; Kyatengerwa et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e425">Nevertheless, definitive CRs still require at least some ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data
to calibrate the parameters that determine the hypothetical wet-surface
evaporation (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>; Qualls and Crago, 2020); thus, they are not fully
free of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data or parameterization. For instance, Brutsaert et al. (2020)
calibrated the single parameter of the CR of Brutsaert (2015) with flux
observations and basin-scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) data to estimate mean annual
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> across the globe. For evaluating four definitive CRs from
the derivation of Brutseart (2015), Crago et al. (2022) also calibrated their
parameters against eddy-covariance flux observations. To date, Szilagyi et al. (2017) have proposed the only CR formulation that purely uses routine
meteorological data; however, it depends on a questionable assumption that
the parameter for ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant over a large continental area, being
counterfactual to experimental studies on the Priestley and Taylor (1972)
coefficient (e.g., Assouline et al., 2016; Baldocchi et al., 2016; Parlange
and Katul, 1992; Wang et al., 2014). Given the complex space–time links
between climate, soil, and vegetation (Hagedorn et al., 2019; Mekonnen et
al., 2019; Rodriguez-Iturbe, 2000), the aerodynamic component of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
unlikely represented by a fixed fraction of the net radiation.</p>
      <p id="d1e495">Owing to the data required for parameter calibration, the state-of-the-art
CR formulations might not be applicable in ungauged locations. In part, this
problem can be mended by an additional constraint for determining the
essential parameters, and the traditional Budyko framework can come into
play. A Budyko function (e.g., Fu, 1981; Yang et al., 2008) explains the
mean ratio of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., surface water balance) simply by
climatological aridity and a few implicit parameters, simultaneously closing
the surface energy budget (Mianabadi et al., 2020). Although Bouchet's
principle has often been linked with the water balance described by Budyko
functions (e.g., Carmona et al., 2016; Chen and Buchberger, 2018; Lhomme and
Moussa, 2016; Zhang and Brutsaert, 2021), this theoretical link has been
ignored when predicting ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the definitive CRs. Kim and Chun (2021)
explicitly showed that the atmospheric self-adjustment is tightly coupled
with the climatological aridity within a Budyko function. This implies
that the optimal parameter for a definitive CR should vary with climates
rather than staying constant.</p>
      <p id="d1e523">In this work, we showed that a Budyko equation could become an important
physical constraint when predicting ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by a definitive CR over a
continental area. Here, a practical approach was proposed to determine the
parameter reasonably in ungauged locations via a case study for the
Australian continent, where the performance of the CR method remained
unknown in many parts. Based on the analytical relationship between the CR
and the Budyko framework, we showed why the parameter of the CR is not
independent of local climate conditions and addressed how to reflect
spatially varying climates in its essential parameter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The polynomial CR by Szilagyi et al. (2017)</title>
      <p id="d1e550">For the case study, we employed the calibration-free CR formulated by
Szilagyi et al. (2017). It describes the atmospheric self-adjustment to
surface moisture conditions using three evaporation rates, namely, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the potential evaporation (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the actual
moisture flux from a land surface to the atmosphere, and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
hypothetical ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rate that should occur with ample water availability.
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric capacity to receive water vapor that responds
actively to soil moisture conditions. By defining the two dimensionless
variables as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Szilagyi et al. (2017) derived a polynomial function from
four definitive boundary conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e664">Under ample water conditions, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> does not deviate from ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; hence, the
corresponding zero-order boundary condition is (i) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
contrast, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> must be nil over a desiccated surface (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
and by energy balance, the surface net radiation should be fully transformed
to the sensible heat flux. Then, the atmospheric VPD would be amplified at
the maximum level with the same net radiation and wind speed. Defining the
maximum ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rate as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, another zero-order boundary condition
is given as (ii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., ample water), changes in ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would be controlled by
changes in ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, yielding a first-order boundary condition as (iii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Over a desiccated surface, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> stays at zero,
even when ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes; thus, another first-order boundary condition
becomes (iv) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The simplest polynomial equation
satisfying the four boundary conditions is
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M76" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> rescales the variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into [0, 1] as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Equation (1) allows users to estimate ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with no land surface information
because ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are all obtainable from a set of
net radiation, air temperature, dew-point temperature, and wind speed data.
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated by the Penman (1948) equation:

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VPD</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the slope of the saturation vapor pressure
curve (kPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the psychrometric constant (kPa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface net radiation less the soil heat flux (MJ m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>v</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the latent heat of vaporization (MJ kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Rome wind function
(mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 2 m wind speed (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>;
and VPD is calculated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dew</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturation vapor pressure (kPa), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dew</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the dew-point temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C).</p>
      <p id="d1e1653"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (4) is the air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) at which the
lower atmosphere is devoid of humidity presumably by the adiabatic drying
process:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M115" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dew</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wet-bulb temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) at which the
saturation vapor pressure curve intersects with the adiabatic wetting line.
Thus, it is obtained by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M118" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">avg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">wb</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dew</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          To estimate ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (2), the Priestley–Taylor (1972) equation has
been a typical choice (e.g., Brutsaert, 2015; Crago et al., 2016; Han and
Tian, 2018; Szilagyi et al., 2017):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M120" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Priestley–Taylor coefficient ranging usually
within [1.10, 1.32] (Szilagyi et al., 2017), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
wet-environment air temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be approximated
with the wet-surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because the vertical air
temperature gradient is negligible under a wet environment. Given its
independence on areal extent (Szilagyi and Schepers, 2014), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
approximated by the implicit Bowen ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a small wet patch:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M128" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ws</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ws</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dew</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Equation (8) assumes that the available radiation for the wet patch is close to
that of the drying surface (Szilagyi et al., 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might be higher
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when the air is close to saturation. In such a case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
should be capped by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when calculating ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2100">The single parameter of the polynomial CR, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is analytically
obtainable by inserting the Priestley–Taylor equation into the Bowen ratio
of a wet environment (Szilagyi et al., 2017) as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M135" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ws</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dew</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ws</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dew</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ws</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must fall within the theoretical limit of [1,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Priestley and Taylor, 1972).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>The analytical relationship between the polynomial CR and a Budyko
function</title>
      <p id="d1e2279">Since Eq. (9) is only applicable in a wet environment, Szilagyi et al. (2017) identified wet locations in a continental area based on the fact that
the air close to saturation should have high relative humidity (RH) with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, they calculated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at
locations with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the average value was used to predict ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a continental area. However, the spatially constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unlikely
suitable in such a large area under diverse climates because the
equilibrium between the atmosphere and the underlying surface is intertwined
with the partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Q over the surface.</p>
      <p id="d1e2386">Kim and Chun (2021) analytically related Eq. (1) with the traditional
Turc–Mezentsev equation and found that the self-adjustment of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is tightly linked with climatological aridity and land properties.
For the independence between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and “the possible maximum ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>” of the
Budyko framework, Kim and Chun (2021) reformulated the traditional equation
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of the commonly used
aridity index (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M153" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">xET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> implicitly represents the factors affecting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning other than the climatic drivers. When dividing Eq. (10) by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is found that the Budyko Eq. (10) is intertwined with the Eq. (1) of the CR:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M157" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Equation (11) implies that the self-adjustment of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is tightly
related with the climatic condition (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the implicit land
property (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2696">While the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be achievable from a set of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values by inverting Eq. (11), such an approach is not
applicable in locations with no ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data. To quantify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values only
using ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, Kim and Chun (2021) developed a
regression equation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from 513 gauged river basins around the world. We used the same regression-based
regionalization. Considering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
nonlinear expression in Eq. (11) can be approximated by a multiple regression as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M178" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the approximate ratio of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the intercept and the regression
coefficients. Since the implicit parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is unavailable in
ungauged locations, Eq. (12) needs to be further simplified by neglecting
the last term:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M186" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the intercept and the coefficients
of the approximated regression.</p>
      <p id="d1e3080">If <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is known by the regression by Eq. (13), the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be estimated using the Priestley–Taylor equation as

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M192" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>14</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E15"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>15</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eq</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Priestley–Taylor coefficient
that approximately satisfies the CR and the Budyko equations together, and
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the equilibrium ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (mm d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at which VPD is nil
under a wet environment. It should be noted that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> within Eqs. (10)–(13) must be on a timescale where the
Turc–Mezentsev equation is valid (typically longer than a year), and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is still bounded within [1,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3331">Spatial distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> the reciprocals of aridity index and
<bold>(b)</bold> the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 predicted by the CR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The red circles and the gray polygons are the locations of 15 flux
towers and the boundaries of 71 CAMELS basins. The blue-colored points in
<bold>(a)</bold> indicate the wet cells with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated at
the grid cells where the land fraction was larger than 50 %.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Atmospheric forcing, eddy-covariance, and runoff data</title>
      <p id="d1e3429">We examined the CR–Budyko combined framework in the Australian continent
lying within (10–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 113–155<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The required atmospheric forcing data (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>dew</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected from the advanced ERA5-Land
reanalysis archive (Muñoz-Sabater et al., 2021) of the European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (<uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu</uri>; last
access: 10 December 2021). The monthly averages of surface latent and sensible
heat fluxes, 2 m air temperature, 2 m dew-point temperature, and 10 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind speed components at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
downloaded for 1981–2020. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated by summing the two heat
fluxes, and the 10 m wind speed components were converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using
the logarithmic wind profile (Allen et al., 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e3555">We also collected the Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and
Meteorology for Large sample Studies (CAMELS; Fowler et al., 2021) series of
datasets (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.921850</ext-link>). The CAMELS datasets comprise daily time series of 19
hydrometeorological variables at 222 unregulated river basins in Australia
up to 2014, and we selected the 71 basins larger than 500 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
contain at least five CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates within the boundaries. The
water-balance ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
each basin was calculated for the two periods of 1981–1997 and 1998–2014.
The mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for the former period was used for the regressions
with Eqs. (12) and (13), and the predicted ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was evaluated against
the latter.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e3646">List of the chosen FLUXNET2015 sites.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Long. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Data period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Site ID</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Long. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Lat. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Data period</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-ASM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">133.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2010–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Rig</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">145.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2011–2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-Cpr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">140.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2010–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Stp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">133.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">17.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2008–2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-DaP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2007–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-TTE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">133.64</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2012-2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-DaS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">14.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2008–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Tum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">148.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">35.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2001–2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-Dry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">132.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2008–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Wac</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">145.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2005–2008</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-Emr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">148.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">23.86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2011–2013</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Whr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">145.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">36.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2011–2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-Gin</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">115.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2011–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">AU-Wom</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">144.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2010-2014</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AU-How</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">131.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2001–2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3963">As a point-scale evaluation dataset, the annual flux observations were taken
from the 15 eddy-covariance stations (Table 1) included in the FLUXNET2015
archive (<uri>https://fluxnet.org/</uri>; last access: 1 July 2021). We
chose the flux towers with two or more annual means and adopted the
energy-balance-corrected latent heat flux observations with the quality
measures “LE_F_MDSQC” higher
than 0.70. Given the fine resolution of the ERA5-Land forcing data, we
believed that the ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates by CR could be directly compared with
the point-scale observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3978">In addition, as a grid-scale evaluation reference, the SILO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were collected from the
Queensland government (<uri>https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/gridded-data</uri>; last access:
1 June 2021) together with the Global RUNoff (GRUN) ENSEMBLE (Ghiggi et al.,
2021) (<uri>https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12794075</uri>; last
access:  1 October 2021). The global Q data were produced at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a machine-learning algorithm trained by
in situ streamflow observations, and potential biases were reduced by
simulations with 21 sets of atmospheric forcing (Ghiggi et al., 2021). The
SILO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at each grid of the
forcing data. After bilinearly unifying the resolutions of SILO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and GRUN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
data, we also calculated the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the entire Australian
continent.</p>
      <p id="d1e4086">Against the grid-scale ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates, performance of the polynomial CR
was also compared with three ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products from a physical, a
machine-learning, and a land surface model. The physical model was the
Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) v3.2 (Martens et al., 2017;
<uri>https://www.gleam.eu</uri>; last access: 3 June 2020) based on the
Priestley–Taylor equation constrained by microwave-derived soil moisture,
surface temperature, and vegetation optical depth. The machine-learning
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> product was the FluxCom (<uri>http://www.fluxcom.org/</uri>; last
access: 18 March 2019) that upscaled in situ observations at 224
eddy-covariance towers using 11 algorithms (Jung et al., 2019). We used the
version forced by the CRUNCEPv8 that has the longest data length from 1950
to 2016. The land surface model product was the ERA5-Land monthly ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu</uri>; last access: 7 July 2021)
simulated by the advanced Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme for Surface Exchanges
over Land (Balsamo et al., 2015). All the modeled ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets
were bilinearly regridded to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
1998–2014 to be compared with the grid-scale ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4173">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comparison between the CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(a)</bold> the annual FLUXNET2015 observations and <bold>(b)</bold> the mean annual
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the 71 CAMELS basins for 1998–2014.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4236">Same as Fig. 2 except <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Performance of the calibration-free CR in Australia</title>
      <p id="d1e4276">Figure 1a depicts the spatial distribution of the inverted aridity index
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that can traditionally categorize climate
conditions. The mean ratios between SILO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014
indicated that 83 % of the Australian land surfaces were under arid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and semi-arid climates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Semi-humid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and humid climates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were only found in the northern and southeastern coastal areas and the
southwestern edge where major cities and agricultural lands have developed.
Despite the high aridity, hyper-arid climates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were not found in Australia.</p>
      <p id="d1e4425">We first examined the calibration-free approach by Szilagyi et al. (2017)
that only uses the meteorological forcing inputs. The blue-colored points in
Fig. 1a are the locations with RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ws</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, at which the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from
Eq. (9) were within 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.047 (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation).
Though the two conditions were met in some mountainous areas in the
southeastern part, we excluded them because unexpectedly high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
were obtained. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fell within the theoretical limits
and was equal to the value used in the prior studies in China (Ma et al.,
2019) and the conterminous United States (Ma and Szilagyi, 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e4529">Using the CR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we predicted ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the entire
Australian continent (Fig. 1b). The distribution of the resulting mean
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 was coherent with that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean
CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged in 262 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85.3 and 547 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 173 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> under arid and semi-arid climates, respectively. On the other
hand, CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in semi-humid and humid locations was much higher, at 886 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 187 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1010 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 213 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The
calibration-free CR predicted the continental mean ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to be as high as 489 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1981–2012, and it was about 11.3 % higher than the
estimate for the same period (439 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Zhang et al. (2016). The
mean fraction of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 (97 %) was larger than the
typical ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> value in Australia (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %; Glenn et al.,
2011), implicating that the constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seemed to make the CR
overrate ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4762">The scatter plots between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated by CR with ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
1981–1997 and the corresponding <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and <bold>(d)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plot between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from CR and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
predicted by Eq. (17). The red <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> symbols are the outliers excluded from the
regression analysis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4868">The overestimation of the calibration-free CR was confirmed by the flux
observations and the basin-scale ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). The percent bias
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-bias) of CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the point-scale annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
while it became more than doubled when compared to the basin-scale
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Though the Pearson correlation coefficients (Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
significantly high between the CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the two evaluation
references, the low Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) to ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> implies
that the CR method could perform poorly in wet river basins. The regression
slopes in Fig. 2 also indicate that the calibration-free CR tends to
increasingly overestimate as climate becomes wetter. The root mean square
error (RMSE) of CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher than to the point
observations. Although it appeared to perform acceptably at the 15 flux
towers, the CR method produced considerable biases in the 71 CAMELS basins.
The performance measures were not as excellent as the same CR method had
shown in the United States (Ma et al., 2021; Ma and Szilagyi, 2019; Kim et al., 2019)
and in China (Ma et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e4968">One may argue that the mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from fractional wet areas is
unlikely representative of the large Australian continent, and this might
introduce the biases to CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates. Hence, we re-simulated CR
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the estimate by Ma et al. (2021) (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from a
global-scale analysis. Figure 3a shows that the predicted ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> became
nearly unbiased at the 15 flux tower locations and seemingly suggests that
the decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could become a solution to improving the CR method.
Nevertheless, the fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> still made the CR overestimate ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the CAMELS basins under <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>(semi-)humid<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> climates, albeit slightly ameliorated
(Fig. 3b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5062">Distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from
Eq. (17) and <bold>(b)</bold> the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 by the CR method
with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f05.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The empirical relationship between
to climate conditions}?><title>The empirical relationship between
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>
and climate conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e5135">Figures 2 and 3 imply that the calibration-free CR with a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
unlikely good at closing the local water balance in (semi-)humid river basins.
To resolve this problem with the CR–Budyko framework, first we estimated the
climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the CAMELS basins using Eq. (11)
with the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1981–1997.
Figure 4a–c illustrate the scatter plots between the resultant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values
between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the other three variables were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 0.44,
respectively (significant at the 1 % level), suggesting that the
self-adjustment of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is not only correlated with climate conditions,
but with land surface properties at least in part. By regressing between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values and the log-transformed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we
obtained an empirical relationship that enables us to spatially predict the
mean annual ratio of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M348" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.949</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.204</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.231</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0712</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The regression coefficients were all significant at the 1 % level, and the
coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.98. The regression equation was
further approximated by discarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the explanatory variables:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><label>17</label><mml:math id="M351" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.023</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.220</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.210</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ET</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pmax</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of Eq. (17) declined to 0.93. We found that the simple
regression between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> further reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.90. While the
heterogeneous land properties exert non-negligible influences, the
regression analyses indicate that the climatic condition dominantly explains
the spatial variation of the atmospheric self-adjustment.</p>
      <p id="d1e5512">Equation (17) performed excellently in reproducing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values from CR with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4d). The NSE, RMSE, Pearson <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-bias between the predicted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from CR were 0.93, 0.03,
0.96, and 0.0 %, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Evaluation of the CR and the advanced models against the grid ET${}_{\text{wb}}$}?><title>Evaluation of the CR and the advanced models against the grid ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e5595">By multiplying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> by the mean annual ratio between ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the
Australian land surfaces. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values ranged within 1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.114, and the median value was almost
equal to the global estimate (1.10) by Ma et al. (2021). They were relatively
high in the northwestern and the northern part while being below the mean
in the southern and the eastern parts (Fig. 5a). On 19 % of the
surfaces, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were unity, and thus they
might become below the theoretical limit unless bounded.</p>
      <p id="d1e5676">We again generated CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the spatially varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. 5b). The mean CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014
ranged in 249 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 78.8 and 530 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 172.0 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
under arid and semi-arid climates, while it decreased to 805.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 209 and 932 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 239 mm a<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in semi-humid and humid regions,
respectively. The flux observations were still acceptably regenerated with
the less biases than in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6a). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the Budyko framework significantly
reduced the biases introduced by the constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in (semi-)humid
basins. Albeit some biases remained, the water-balance ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
1998–2014 in the CAMELS basins were better reproduced by the spatially
varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 6b).</p>
      <p id="d1e5828">To confirm the improved performance of the combined CR–Budyko method across
Australia, we resampled the new CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and compared them with the grid ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data.
The ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products by GLEAM, FluxCom, and ERA5-Land were evaluated with
the grid evaluation reference. As shown, the CR method with a constant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> overrated the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> along the eastern and
the northern coastlines (Fig. 7b), underperforming the physical, the
machine-learning, and the land surface models (Figure 8a). Although the
smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> made the CR method perform better, its
predictability was still poorer than the three advanced models, and the
residual variance was as large as in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5934">Same as Fig. 2 except that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values from Eq. (17) were used for CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5966">In contrast, when employing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditioned
by local climate conditions, the same CR formulation could alleviate the
overestimation along the coastlines (Fig. 7c). The Budyko-function-based
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> led the CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates to neatly agree
with the grid ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the residual variance was much smaller than in
the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 8c). The CR method with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> clearly outperformed the three advanced models in
reproducing the grid ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates (Fig. 8d–f). Although the
referenced grid ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has some error sources associated with the upscaling
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, our comparative evaluation suggests that conditioning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with local climate conditions could substantially reduce the uncertainty of
CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in ungauged areas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Constraining the CR with the Budyko framework for ungauged areas</title>
      <p id="d1e6115">The CR explains the dynamic equilibrium between the atmospheric ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
the underlying moisture conditions, while the Budyko framework describes the
steady-state water balance with climatic controls (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The analytical link between the CR and the Budyko equations, hence, implies
that the atmospheric self-adjustment needs to be conditioned by the
long-term climate conditions. Constraining the Turc–Mezentsev equation by
the polynomial CR, Kim and Chun (2021) found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes would be more
sensitive to climatic changes than when they were not linked. In the
opposite direction, the CR can be constrained by the Budyko equation to
determine its essential parameter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6155">Distributions of <bold>(a)</bold> the mean annual water-balance ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for
1998–2014 and the predictions by <bold>(b)</bold> CR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> CR with
spatially varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> GLEAM, <bold>(e)</bold> FluxCom,
and <bold>(f)</bold> ERA5-Land.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f07.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6223">Scatter plots between the mean annual ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for 1998–2014 at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the predictions by <bold>(a)</bold> CR with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> CR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> CR with spatially
varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> GLEAM, <bold>(e)</bold> FluxCom, and <bold>(f)</bold> ERA5-Land.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5955/2022/hess-26-5955-2022-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6324">In Crago and Qualls (2018), the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the linear CR of Crago
et al. (2016) varied largely between 1.00 and 1.43. This point-scale
experiment has already suggested that a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unlikely
suitable for definitive CRs to predict ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Australia. The ratio
between the aerodynamic and the radiation components of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is
evidently affected by the heat entrainment from the top of the boundary
layer (Baldocchi et al., 2016), the dissimilarity between heat and water
vapor sources (Assouline et al., 2016), the large-scale synoptic changes
(Guo et al., 2015), and the horizontal advection of dry-air mass (Jury and
Tanner, 1975). More recently, Han et al. (2021) proved the nonlinear
dependence of ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> on ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Yang and Roderick (2019) showed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changing with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over ocean surfaces. Hence, the constant
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assumption underpinning the calibration-free CR is counterintuitive
to the theoretical and empirical evidence. Although Ma et al. (2021) found
some global applicability of the calibration-free CR, its performance
remains unknown in most of the Australian surfaces and in many ungauged
basins over the world.</p>
      <p id="d1e6419">Since ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a pivotal role in the terrestrial water and energy
balances, the partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the latent and the sensible heat
fluxes cannot be independent of the partitioning of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> into ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
On a mean annual scale, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>w</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the major determinants of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> partitioning, and thus the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might not be independent of P.
Given the large variability of P, assuming a fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across a
continental area may introduce considerable biases to CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates.
Thus, discarding available <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> data may not be a good choice when predicting
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by the CR method in ungauged areas. It is noteworthy that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
dominantly explained the spatial variation of the mean annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the 71
CAMELS basins, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values conditioned by
local climates were of a large spatial variation. This suggests that the CR
with a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may produce unreliable ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates in
ungauged locations.</p>
      <p id="d1e6586">Nonetheless, the low performance with a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not indicate
that the CR method underperforms the sophisticated ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> models. The
simple polynomial CR seemed to outperform the advanced the advanced
physical, machine-learning, and land surface models, when its parameter was
conditioned by local climates. The proposed CR–Budyko framework enabled us to
regionalize the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the CR method from gauged basins to
ungauged locations in an empirical manner. It should be highlighted that the
CR with spatially varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced much
smaller residual variance than the three advanced models.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Remaining issues and caveats</title>
      <p id="d1e6642">In seven Australian eddy-covariance flux towers, Crago et al. (2022) found
that the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the polynomial CR was 1.35 for predicting daily
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the dimensionless form (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,
it was increased to 1.42, 1.45, 1.47, and 1.50 to simulate the dimensional
latent heat fluxes at daily, weekly, monthly, and annual timescales,
respectively. This implies that the timescale would largely affect the
optimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the definitive CRs. Though the stationary Budyko
equation can become a constraint at a mean-annual scale, how to capture the
scale dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a remaining question.</p>
      <p id="d1e6711">Further questions can arise as to how to quantify ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>pmax</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
For example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the Rome wind function
rely upon an unrealistic assumption that the aerodynamic resistance on a
vegetated surface is equivalent to that of an open-water surface. It is
still unknown if this assumption is practically valid because the Penman
equation with the Rome wind function may result in unrealistically high
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, even on a large wet area (McMahon et al., 2013). Given the
importance of the aerodynamic resistance in modulating surface temperature
(Chen et al., 2020), ignoring its variability may become a significant error
source for the CR method at both annual and subannual timescales.</p>
      <p id="d1e6763">In addition, there are some caveats in our case study. We employed the
meteorological data different from those used in Ma et al. (2021). The
ERA5-Land dataset is a downscaled version of the ERA5 data (Hersbach et al.,
2020) by which Ma et al. (2021) predicted ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> globally. Ma et al. (2021) incorporated remotely sensed albedo and emissivity together with a
correction factor when calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>n</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas we used the sum of the
ERA5-Land latent and sensible heat fluxes. Those input differences may lead
to differences in CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates.</p>
      <p id="d1e6795">The gridded GRUN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, too, has some uncertainty sources, though it is the
ensemble of many runoff simulations from 21 different atmospheric forcing
inputs. In the machine-leaning process by Ghiggi et al. (2021), some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations affected by human activities (e.g., dam regulation and return
flows from groundwater abstraction) might not be excluded, potentially
disrupting the empirical relationship between atmospheric forcing and
natural flows. In addition, the uncertainty of SILO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> might be
non-negligible in areas with limited weather stations and in mountainous
areas (Fu et al., 2022). Though we reduced the potential biases of the
gridded <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets by temporal averaging, the grid-scale ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>wb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
estimates should be treated as plausible values rather than exact
observations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e6852">Via a case study in Australia, we showed that the polynomial CR by Szilagyi
et al. (2017) is unlikely to perform well when local climate conditions are
neglected. The assumption of a constant Priestley–Taylor coefficient cannot
reflect the long-term water balance; thereby, CR ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates can be
biased. We resolved this problem by conditioning the CR with the traditional
Budyko equation, and it allowed for a reasonable determination of the essential
parameter in ungauged locations. The following conclusions are worth
emphasizing:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6866">The constant Priestley–Taylor coefficient transferred from fractional
wet locations could make the CR method perform poorly in closing the local water
balance. The unrealistic assumption could make the CR method underperform
the advanced physical, machine-learning, and land surface models.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6870">The Budyko framework can play a role in determining the degree of
ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> adjustment at the mean annual scale. It allows for upscaling of the
Priestley–Taylor coefficients from gauged to ungauged locations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6883">The Priestley–Taylor coefficients conditioned by local climates made the
CR better close the basin-scale water balance. The spatially varying
Priestley–Taylor coefficients seemed to make the CR method outperform the
advanced ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> models.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6899">The Python scripts that implement the CR method are available upon request
from the lead author (daeha.kim@jbnu.ac.kr).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6905">All the datasets used in this study are publicly available. ERA5-Land reanalysis datasets are available for download at <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-land-monthly-means?tab=overview</uri> (last access: 10 December 2021; Muñoz-Sabater et al., 2021). The Australian edition of the Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large sample Studies is at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.921850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.921850</ext-link> (last access: 14 March 2022; Fowler et al., 2021). FLUXNET2015 data are readily available from the FLUXNET-Fluxdata Portal at <uri>https://fluxnet.org/data/fluxnet2015-dataset/</uri> (last access: 1 July 2021). The GRUN ENSEMBLE can be accessed at <uri>https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/G-RUN_ENSEMBLE/12794075</uri> (1 October 2021; Ghiggi et al., 2021). SILO P data are provided by the Queensland Government at <uri>https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/silo/gridded-data/</uri> (last access: 1 June 2021). The GLEAM is available for download at <uri>https://www.gleam.eu/</uri> (last access: last access: 3 June 2020; Martens et al., 2017), and the FluxCom is given at <uri>http://www.fluxcom.org/EF-Download/</uri> (last access: 18 March 2019; Jung et al., 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6933">DK, MC, and JAC organized this study together. DK built the research
framework, simulated ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with the CR method, and drafted the
manuscript. JAC processed the modeled ET<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets and reviewed the
draft, and MC actively participated in discussing the results.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6957">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e6963">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6969">This work was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry &amp; Technology
Institute (KEITI) through the Wetland Ecosystem Value Evaluation and Carbon
Absorption Value Promotion Technology Development Project, funded by the Korea
Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2022003640001). This work was supported by
the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Korea
government (MSIT) (NRF-2022R1A2C2010266).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6974">This research has been jointly supported by the KEITI of MOE (grant no. 2022003640001) and the NRF of MSIT (grant no. NRF-2022R1A2C2010266).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6981">This paper was edited by Adriaan J. (Ryan) Teuling and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, <uri>http://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm</uri> (last access: 10 June 2021), ISBN 92-5-104219-5, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anayah, F. M. and Kaluarachchi, J. J.: Improving the complementary methods to estimate evapotranspiration under diverse climatic and physical conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2049–2064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2049-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-18-2049-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Assouline, S., Li, D., Tyler, S., Tanny, J., Cohen, S., Bou-Zeid, E.,
Parlange, M., and Katul, G. G.: On the variability of the Priestley-Taylor
coefficient over water bodies, Water Resour. Res., 52, 150–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017504" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015wr017504</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baldocchi, D. D.: How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to
our understanding of Global Change Biology, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 242–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.14807</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baldocchi, D., Knox, S., Dronova, I., Verfaillie, J., Oikawa, P.,
Sturtevant, C., Matthes, J. M., and Detto, M.: The impact of expanding
flooded land area on the annual evaporation of rice, Agr. Forest Meteorol.
223, 181–193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.001</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Balsamo, G., Albergel, C., Beljaars, A., Boussetta, S., Brun, E., Cloke, H., Dee, D., Dutra, E., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Pappenberger, F., de Rosnay, P., Stockdale, T., and Vitart, F.: ERA-Interim/Land: a global land surface reanalysis data set, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 389–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-389-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-19-389-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bouchet, R. J.: Evapotranspiration re'elle et potentielle, signification
climatique, in: General Assembly Berkeley, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol.,
Gentbrugge, Belgium, Publ. No. 62, 134–142, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brutsaert, W., Cheng, L., and Zhang, L.: Spatial distribution of global
landscape evaporation in the early twenty-first century by means of a
generalized complementary approach, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 287–298,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0208.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM-D-19-0208.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brutsaert, W., Li, W., Takahashi, A., Hiyama, T., Zhang, L., and Liu, W.:
Nonlinear advection-aridity method for landscape evaporation and its
application during the growing season in the southern Loess Plateau of the
Yellow River basin, Water Resour. Res., 53, 270–282.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019472" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019472</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brutsaert, W.: A generalized complementary principle with physical
constraints for land-surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 51,
8087–8093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015WR017720</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carmona, A. M., Poveda, G., Sivapalan, M., Vallejo-Bernal, S. M., and Bustamante, E.: A scaling approach to Budyko's framework and the complementary relationship of evapotranspiration in humid environments: case study of the Amazon River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 589–603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-589-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-589-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, C., Li, D., Li, Y., Piao, S., Wang, X., Huang, M., Gentine, P.,
Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R. B.: Biophysical impacts of Earth greening
largely controlled by aerodynamic resistance, Sci. Adv., 6, eabb1981,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb1981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abb1981</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, X. and Buchberger, S. G.: Exploring the relationships between warm-season precipitation, potential evaporation, and “apparent” potential evaporation at site scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4535–4545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4535-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-4535-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R. D. and Qualls, R. J.: A graphical interpretation of the rescaled
complementary relationship for evapotranspiration. Water Resour. Res., 57,
e2020WR028299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020WR028299</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R. D., and Qualls, R. J.: Evaluation of the generalized and rescaled
complementary evaporation relationships, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8086–8102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018WR023401</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R. D. and Qualls, R. J.: The value of intuitive concepts in
evaporation research, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6100–6104,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20420</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R. D., Qualls, R., and Szilagyi, J.: Complementary Relationship for
evaporation performance at different spatial and temporal scales, J.
Hydrol., 608, 127575, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127575</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R. and Crowley, R.: Complementary relationships for
near-instantaneous evaporation, J. Hydrol., 300, 199–211,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.002</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crago, R., Szilagyi, J., Qualls, R., and Huntington, J.: Rescaling the
complementary relationship for land surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res.,
52, 8461–8471, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019753</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fowler, K. J. A., Acharya, S. C., Addor, N., Chou, C., and Peel, M. C.: CAMELS-AUS: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 222 catchments in Australia, [data set], Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3847–3867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fu, B. P.: On the calculation of evaporation from land surface.
Scientia Atmospherica Sinica, 1, 23–31, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fu, G., Barron, O., Charles, S. P., Donn, M. J., Van Niel, T. G., and
Hodgson, G.: Uncertainty of gridded precipitation at local and continent
scales: A direct comparison of rainfall from SILO and AWAP in Australia,
Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 471–488,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00267-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13143-022-00267-4</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I., and Gudmundsson, L.: G-RUN
ENSEMBLE: A multi-forcing observation-based global runoff reanalysis, [data set], Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028787, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028787" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020WR028787</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Glenn, E.P., Doody, T.M., Guerschman, J.P., Huete, A.R., King, E.A.,
McVicar, T.R., Van Dijk, A.I.J.M., Van Niel, T.G., Yebra, M., and Zhang, Y.:
Actual evapotranspiration estimation by ground and remote sensing methods:
the Australian experience, Hydrol. Proc., 25, 4103–4116,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.8391</ext-link>, 2011</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guimberteau, M., Zhu, D., Maignan, F., Huang, Y., Yue, C., Dantec-Nédélec, S., Ottlé, C., Jornet-Puig, A., Bastos, A., Laurent, P., Goll, D., Bowring, S., Chang, J., Guenet, B., Tifafi, M., Peng, S., Krinner, G., Ducharne, A., Wang, F., Wang, T., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yin, Z., Lauerwald, R., Joetzjer, E., Qiu, C., Kim, H., and Ciais, P.: ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a land surface model for the high latitudes: model description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 121–163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-121-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-121-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guo, X., Liu, H., and Yang, K.: On the application of the Priestley–Taylor
relation on sub-daily time scales, Bound. Lay. Meteorol., 156, 489–499,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0031-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-015-0031-y</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hagedorn, F., Gavazov, K., and Alexander, J. M.: Above- and belowground
linkages shape responses of mountain vegetation to climate change, Science,
365, 1119–1123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aax4737</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, S. and Tian, F.: Derivation of a sigmoid generalized complementary
function for evaporation with physical constraints, Water Resour. Res., 54,
5050–5068, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017WR021755</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Han, S., Tian, F., Wang, W., and Wang, L.: Sigmoid generalized complementary
equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the
Priestley-Taylor equation, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028737,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020WR028737</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haverd, V., Smith, B., Nieradzik, L., Briggs, P. R., Woodgate, W., Trudinger, C. M., Canadell, J. G., and Cuntz, M.: A new version of the CABLE land surface model (Subversion revision r4601) incorporating land use and land cover change, woody vegetation demography, and a novel optimisation-based approach to plant coordination of photosynthesis, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2995–3026, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hobbins, M. T., Ramírez, J. A., and Brown, T. C.: Trends in pan
evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.:
Paradoxical or complementary? Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L13503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019846" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL019846</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huntington, J. L., Szilagyi, J., Tyler, S. W., and Pohll, G. M.: Evaluating
the complementary relationship for estimating evapotranspiration from arid
shrublands, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05533,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009874" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010WR009874</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jasechko, S.: Plants turn on the tap, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 562–563,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0212-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-018-0212-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G.,
Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G., and Reichstein, M: The FLUXCOM
ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes, [data set], Sci. data, 6, 74,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jury, W. and Tanner, C.: Advection modification of the Priestley and Taylor
evapotranspiration formula, Agron. J., 67, 840–842,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.000219620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2134/agronj1975.000219620</ext-link>, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kahler, D. M. and Brutsaert, W.: Complementary relationship between daily
evaporation in the environment and pan evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 42,
W05413, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005WR004541</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, D., and Chun, J. A.: Revisiting a two-parameter Budyko equation with
the complementary evaporation principle for proper consideration of surface
energy balance, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR030838,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030838" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021WR030838</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, D., Ha, K.-J., and Yeo, J.-H.: New drought projections over East Asia
using evapotranspiration deficits from the CMIP6 warming scenarios, Earths
Future, 9, e2020EF001697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001697" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020EF001697</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, D., Lee, W.-S., Kim, S. T., and Chun, J. A.: Historical drought
assessment over the contiguous United States using the generalized
complementary principle of evapotranspiration, Water Resour. Res., 55,
6244–6267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024991" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019WR024991</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kyatengerwa, C., Kim, D., and Choi, M.: A national-scale drought assessment
in Uganda based on evapotranspiration deficits from the Bouchet hypothesis,
J. Hydrol., 500, 124348, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124348</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lhomme, J.-P. and Moussa, R.: Matching the Budyko functions with the complementary evaporation relationship: consequences for the drying power of the air and the Priestley–Taylor coefficient, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4857–4865, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4857-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-20-4857-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, N. and Szilagyi, J.: The CR of evaporation: a calibration-free
diagnostic and benchmarking tool for large-scale terrestrial
evapotranspiration modeling. Water Resour. Res., 55, 7246–7274,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024867" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019WR024867</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Szilagyi, J., and Zhang, Y.: Calibration-free complementary
relationship estimates terrestrial evapotranspiration globally, Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029691, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029691" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021WR029691</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ma, N., Szilagyi, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, W.:
Complementary-relationship-based modeling of terrestrial evapotranspiration
across China during 1982–2012: validations and spatiotemporal analyses, J.
Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 4326–4351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029850" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD029850</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture,  [data set], Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1903–1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martens, B., Schumacher, D. L., Wouters, H., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Verhoest, N. E. C., and Miralles, D. G.: Evaluating the land-surface energy partitioning in ERA5, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4159–4181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMahon, T. A., Peel, M. C., Lowe, L., Srikanthan, R., and McVicar, T. R.: Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1331–1363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mekonnen, Z. A., Riley, W. J., Randerson, J. T., Grant, R. F., and Rogers,
B. M.: Expansion of high-latitude deciduous forests driven by interactions
between climate warming and fire, Nat. Plants, 5, 952–958,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0495-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41477-019-0495-8</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mianabadi, A., Davary, K., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., and Coenders-Gerrits, A. M.
J.: Budyko framework: Towards non-steady state conditions, J. Hydrol.,
588, 125089, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miralles, D., G., Teuling, A., J. van Heerwaarden, C. C., and de Arellano,
J. V.-G.: Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and
atmospheric heat accumulation, Nat. Geosci., 7, 345–349,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2141</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mueller, B. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Hot days induced by precipitation
deficits at the global scale, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 12398–12403,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204330109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1204330109</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, [data set], Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Novick, K. A., Biederman, J. A., Desai, A. R., Litvak, M. E., Moore, D. J.
P., Scott, R. L., and Torn, M. S.: The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the
willing, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 249, 444–456,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.00" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.00</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pan, S., Pan, N., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Shi, H., Arora, V. K., Haverd, V., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Ottlé, C., Poulter, B., Zaehle, S., and Running, S. W.: Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration using state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning and land surface modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pareek, A., Dhankher, O. P., and Foyer, C. H.: Mitigating the impact of
climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainability, J. Exp.
Bot., 71, 451–456, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz518" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/jxb/erz518</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Parlange, M. B. and Katul, G. G.: Estimation of the diurnal variation of
potential evaporation from a wet bare soil surface, J. Hydrol., 132, 71–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90173-s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-1694(92)90173-s</ext-link>, 1992.Qualls and Crago, 2020</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bares soil, and grass,
P. Roy. Soc. A, 193, 120–146.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.1948.0037</ext-link>, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Priestley, C. H. and Taylor, R. J.: On the assessment of surface heat flux
and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100,
81–92, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramírez, J. A., Hobbins, M. T., and Brown, T. C.: Observational
evidence of the complementary relationship in regional evaporation lends
strong support for Bouchet's hypothesis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15401,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023549</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of
climate-soil-vegetation dynamies, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3–9,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999WR900210</ext-link>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schlosser, C. A. and Gao, X.: Assessing evapotranspiration estimates from
the second global soil wetness project (GSWP-2) simulations, J.
Hydrometeorol., 11, 880–897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jhm1203.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010jhm1203.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schumacher, D.L., Keune, J., van Heerwaarden, C.C., de Alrellano, J. V.,
Teuling, A. J., and Miralles, D. G.: Amplification of mega-heatwaves through
heat torrents fuelled by upwind drought, Nat. Geosci., 12, 712–717,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0431-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-019-0431-6</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sun, Q., Miao, C., Duan, Q., Ashouri, H., Sorooshian, S., and Hsu, K.-L.: A
review of global precipitation datasets: Data sources, estimation, and
intercomparisons, Rev. Geophys., 56, 79–107,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017rg000574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017rg000574</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Szilagyi, J. and Schepers, A.: Coupled heat and vapor transport: The
thermostat effect of a freely evaporating land surface, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 435–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013gl058979</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Szilagyi, J., Crago, R., and Qualls, R.: A calibration-free formulation of
the complementary relationship of evaporation for continental-scale
hydrology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 264–278,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd025611</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Szilagyi, J.: On the thermodynamics foundations of the complementary
relationship of evaporation, J. Hydrol., 593, 125916,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125916</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tramontana, G., Jung, M., Schwalm, C. R., Ichii, K., Camps-Valls, G., Ráduly, B., Reichstein, M., Arain, M. A., Cescatti, A., Kiely, G., Merbold, L., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sickert, S., Wolf, S., and Papale, D.: Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms, Biogeosciences, 13, 4291–4313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., and Kiehl, J.: Earth's global energy
budget, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 311–324,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Trenberth, K. E., Smith, L., Qian, T., Dai, A., and Fasullo, J.: Estimates
of the global water Budget and its annual cycle using observational and
model data, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 758–769,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM600.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JHM600.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Xiao, W., Cao, C., Gao, Z., Hu, Z., Liu, S., Shen, S., Wang, L.,
Xiao, Q., Xu, J., Yang D., and Lee X.: Temporal and spatial variations in
radiation and energy balance across a large freshwater lake in China, J.
Hydrol., 511, 811–824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.012</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the
mean annual water balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007WR006135</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, Y. and Roderick, M. L.: Radiation, surface temperature and
evaporation over wet surfaces, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 1118–1129,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3481</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, K., Zhu, G., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Shang, S., and Gu, C.: Parameter
analysis and estimates for the MODIS evapotranspiration algorithm and
multiscale verification, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2211–2231,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018wr023485</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, L. and Brutsaert, W.: Blending the evaporation precipitation ratio
with the complementary principle function for the prediction of evaporation,
Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029729, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029729" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021WR029729</ext-link>,
2021
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., McVicar, T. R., Chiew, F. H., Vaze,
J., Liu, C., Lu, X., Zheng, H., Wang, Y., and Liu, Y. Y.: Multi-decadal
trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components, Sci.
Rep., 6, 19124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep19124</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhou, S., Williams, A. P., Berg, A. M., Cook, B. I., Zhang, Y., Hagemann,
S., Lorenz, R., Seneviratne, S. I., and Gentine, P.: Land–atmosphere
feedbacks exacerbate concurrent soil drought and atmospheric aridity, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 18848–18853,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904955116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1904955116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Linking the complementary evaporation relationship with the Budyko framework for ungauged areas in Australia</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, <a href="http://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 June 2021), ISBN 92-5-104219-5, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anayah, F. M. and Kaluarachchi, J. J.: Improving the complementary methods to estimate evapotranspiration under diverse climatic and physical conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2049–2064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2049-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2049-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Assouline, S., Li, D., Tyler, S., Tanny, J., Cohen, S., Bou-Zeid, E.,
Parlange, M., and Katul, G. G.: On the variability of the Priestley-Taylor
coefficient over water bodies, Water Resour. Res., 52, 150–163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017504" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017504</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D. D.: How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to
our understanding of Global Change Biology, Glob. Change Biol., 26, 242–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14807</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Baldocchi, D., Knox, S., Dronova, I., Verfaillie, J., Oikawa, P.,
Sturtevant, C., Matthes, J. M., and Detto, M.: The impact of expanding
flooded land area on the annual evaporation of rice, Agr. Forest Meteorol.
223, 181–193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.001</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Balsamo, G., Albergel, C., Beljaars, A., Boussetta, S., Brun, E., Cloke, H., Dee, D., Dutra, E., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Pappenberger, F., de Rosnay, P., Stockdale, T., and Vitart, F.: ERA-Interim/Land: a global land surface reanalysis data set, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 389–407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-389-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-389-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bouchet, R. J.: Evapotranspiration re'elle et potentielle, signification
climatique, in: General Assembly Berkeley, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol.,
Gentbrugge, Belgium, Publ. No. 62, 134–142, 1963.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brutsaert, W., Cheng, L., and Zhang, L.: Spatial distribution of global
landscape evaporation in the early twenty-first century by means of a
generalized complementary approach, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 287–298,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0208.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0208.1</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Brutsaert, W., Li, W., Takahashi, A., Hiyama, T., Zhang, L., and Liu, W.:
Nonlinear advection-aridity method for landscape evaporation and its
application during the growing season in the southern Loess Plateau of the
Yellow River basin, Water Resour. Res., 53, 270–282.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019472" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019472</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brutsaert, W.: A generalized complementary principle with physical
constraints for land-surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 51,
8087–8093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017720" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017720</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Carmona, A. M., Poveda, G., Sivapalan, M., Vallejo-Bernal, S. M., and Bustamante, E.: A scaling approach to Budyko's framework and the complementary relationship of evapotranspiration in humid environments: case study of the Amazon River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 589–603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-589-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-589-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C., Li, D., Li, Y., Piao, S., Wang, X., Huang, M., Gentine, P.,
Nemani, R. R., and Myneni, R. B.: Biophysical impacts of Earth greening
largely controlled by aerodynamic resistance, Sci. Adv., 6, eabb1981,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb1981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb1981</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, X. and Buchberger, S. G.: Exploring the relationships between warm-season precipitation, potential evaporation, and “apparent” potential evaporation at site scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4535–4545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4535-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4535-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R. D. and Qualls, R. J.: A graphical interpretation of the rescaled
complementary relationship for evapotranspiration. Water Resour. Res., 57,
e2020WR028299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028299</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R. D., and Qualls, R. J.: Evaluation of the generalized and rescaled
complementary evaporation relationships, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8086–8102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023401</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R. D. and Qualls, R. J.: The value of intuitive concepts in
evaporation research, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6100–6104,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20420</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R. D., Qualls, R., and Szilagyi, J.: Complementary Relationship for
evaporation performance at different spatial and temporal scales, J.
Hydrol., 608, 127575, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127575</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R. and Crowley, R.: Complementary relationships for
near-instantaneous evaporation, J. Hydrol., 300, 199–211,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.002</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Crago, R., Szilagyi, J., Qualls, R., and Huntington, J.: Rescaling the
complementary relationship for land surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res.,
52, 8461–8471, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019753</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, K. J. A., Acharya, S. C., Addor, N., Chou, C., and Peel, M. C.: CAMELS-AUS: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 222 catchments in Australia, [data set], Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3847–3867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3847-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, B. P.: On the calculation of evaporation from land surface.
Scientia Atmospherica Sinica, 1, 23–31, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, G., Barron, O., Charles, S. P., Donn, M. J., Van Niel, T. G., and
Hodgson, G.: Uncertainty of gridded precipitation at local and continent
scales: A direct comparison of rainfall from SILO and AWAP in Australia,
Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 471–488,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00267-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00267-4</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Ghiggi, G., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I., and Gudmundsson, L.: G-RUN
ENSEMBLE: A multi-forcing observation-based global runoff reanalysis, [data set], Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028787, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028787" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028787</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Glenn, E.P., Doody, T.M., Guerschman, J.P., Huete, A.R., King, E.A.,
McVicar, T.R., Van Dijk, A.I.J.M., Van Niel, T.G., Yebra, M., and Zhang, Y.:
Actual evapotranspiration estimation by ground and remote sensing methods:
the Australian experience, Hydrol. Proc., 25, 4103–4116,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8391</a>, 2011
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Guimberteau, M., Zhu, D., Maignan, F., Huang, Y., Yue, C., Dantec-Nédélec, S., Ottlé, C., Jornet-Puig, A., Bastos, A., Laurent, P., Goll, D., Bowring, S., Chang, J., Guenet, B., Tifafi, M., Peng, S., Krinner, G., Ducharne, A., Wang, F., Wang, T., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yin, Z., Lauerwald, R., Joetzjer, E., Qiu, C., Kim, H., and Ciais, P.: ORCHIDEE-MICT (v8.4.1), a land surface model for the high latitudes: model description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 121–163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-121-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-121-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Guo, X., Liu, H., and Yang, K.: On the application of the Priestley–Taylor
relation on sub-daily time scales, Bound. Lay. Meteorol., 156, 489–499,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0031-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0031-y</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hagedorn, F., Gavazov, K., and Alexander, J. M.: Above- and belowground
linkages shape responses of mountain vegetation to climate change, Science,
365, 1119–1123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4737</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Han, S. and Tian, F.: Derivation of a sigmoid generalized complementary
function for evaporation with physical constraints, Water Resour. Res., 54,
5050–5068, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021755</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Han, S., Tian, F., Wang, W., and Wang, L.: Sigmoid generalized complementary
equation for evaporation over wet surfaces: A nonlinear modification of the
Priestley-Taylor equation, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR028737,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028737</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Haverd, V., Smith, B., Nieradzik, L., Briggs, P. R., Woodgate, W., Trudinger, C. M., Canadell, J. G., and Cuntz, M.: A new version of the CABLE land surface model (Subversion revision r4601) incorporating land use and land cover change, woody vegetation demography, and a novel optimisation-based approach to plant coordination of photosynthesis, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2995–3026, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2995-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hobbins, M. T., Ramírez, J. A., and Brown, T. C.: Trends in pan
evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.:
Paradoxical or complementary? Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L13503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019846" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019846</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Huntington, J. L., Szilagyi, J., Tyler, S. W., and Pohll, G. M.: Evaluating
the complementary relationship for estimating evapotranspiration from arid
shrublands, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05533,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009874" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009874</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jasechko, S.: Plants turn on the tap, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 562–563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0212-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0212-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G.,
Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G., and Reichstein, M: The FLUXCOM
ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes, [data set], Sci. data, 6, 74,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0076-8</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Jury, W. and Tanner, C.: Advection modification of the Priestley and Taylor
evapotranspiration formula, Agron. J., 67, 840–842,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.000219620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.000219620</a>, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kahler, D. M. and Brutsaert, W.: Complementary relationship between daily
evaporation in the environment and pan evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 42,
W05413, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004541</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., and Chun, J. A.: Revisiting a two-parameter Budyko equation with
the complementary evaporation principle for proper consideration of surface
energy balance, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR030838,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030838" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030838</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., Ha, K.-J., and Yeo, J.-H.: New drought projections over East Asia
using evapotranspiration deficits from the CMIP6 warming scenarios, Earths
Future, 9, e2020EF001697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001697" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001697</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, D., Lee, W.-S., Kim, S. T., and Chun, J. A.: Historical drought
assessment over the contiguous United States using the generalized
complementary principle of evapotranspiration, Water Resour. Res., 55,
6244–6267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024991" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024991</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kyatengerwa, C., Kim, D., and Choi, M.: A national-scale drought assessment
in Uganda based on evapotranspiration deficits from the Bouchet hypothesis,
J. Hydrol., 500, 124348, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124348</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lhomme, J.-P. and Moussa, R.: Matching the Budyko functions with the complementary evaporation relationship: consequences for the drying power of the air and the Priestley–Taylor coefficient, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4857–4865, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4857-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4857-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, N. and Szilagyi, J.: The CR of evaporation: a calibration-free
diagnostic and benchmarking tool for large-scale terrestrial
evapotranspiration modeling. Water Resour. Res., 55, 7246–7274,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024867" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024867</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, N., Szilagyi, J., and Zhang, Y.: Calibration-free complementary
relationship estimates terrestrial evapotranspiration globally, Water
Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029691, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029691" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029691</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, N., Szilagyi, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, W.:
Complementary-relationship-based modeling of terrestrial evapotranspiration
across China during 1982–2012: validations and spatiotemporal analyses, J.
Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 4326–4351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029850" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029850</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture,  [data set], Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1903–1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Martens, B., Schumacher, D. L., Wouters, H., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Verhoest, N. E. C., and Miralles, D. G.: Evaluating the land-surface energy partitioning in ERA5, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4159–4181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4159-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McMahon, T. A., Peel, M. C., Lowe, L., Srikanthan, R., and McVicar, T. R.: Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1331–1363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mekonnen, Z. A., Riley, W. J., Randerson, J. T., Grant, R. F., and Rogers,
B. M.: Expansion of high-latitude deciduous forests driven by interactions
between climate warming and fire, Nat. Plants, 5, 952–958,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0495-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-019-0495-8</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Mianabadi, A., Davary, K., Pourreza-Bilondi, M., and Coenders-Gerrits, A. M.
J.: Budyko framework: Towards non-steady state conditions, J. Hydrol.,
588, 125089, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125089</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Miralles, D., G., Teuling, A., J. van Heerwaarden, C. C., and de Arellano,
J. V.-G.: Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and
atmospheric heat accumulation, Nat. Geosci., 7, 345–349,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2141</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Mueller, B. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Hot days induced by precipitation
deficits at the global scale, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 12398–12403,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204330109" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204330109</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, [data set], Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Novick, K. A., Biederman, J. A., Desai, A. R., Litvak, M. E., Moore, D. J.
P., Scott, R. L., and Torn, M. S.: The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the
willing, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 249, 444–456,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.00" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.10.00</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, S., Pan, N., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Shi, H., Arora, V. K., Haverd, V., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Ottlé, C., Poulter, B., Zaehle, S., and Running, S. W.: Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration using state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning and land surface modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1485–1509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1485-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pareek, A., Dhankher, O. P., and Foyer, C. H.: Mitigating the impact of
climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainability, J. Exp.
Bot., 71, 451–456, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz518" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz518</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Parlange, M. B. and Katul, G. G.: Estimation of the diurnal variation of
potential evaporation from a wet bare soil surface, J. Hydrol., 132, 71–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90173-s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90173-s</a>, 1992.Qualls and Crago, 2020
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Penman, H. L.: Natural evaporation from open water, bares soil, and grass,
P. Roy. Soc. A, 193, 120–146.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037</a>, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Priestley, C. H. and Taylor, R. J.: On the assessment of surface heat flux
and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Mon. Weather Rev., 100,
81–92, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ramírez, J. A., Hobbins, M. T., and Brown, T. C.: Observational
evidence of the complementary relationship in regional evaporation lends
strong support for Bouchet's hypothesis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L15401,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023549</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of
climate-soil-vegetation dynamies, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900210</a>, 2000.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schlosser, C. A. and Gao, X.: Assessing evapotranspiration estimates from
the second global soil wetness project (GSWP-2) simulations, J.
Hydrometeorol., 11, 880–897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jhm1203.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jhm1203.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schumacher, D.L., Keune, J., van Heerwaarden, C.C., de Alrellano, J. V.,
Teuling, A. J., and Miralles, D. G.: Amplification of mega-heatwaves through
heat torrents fuelled by upwind drought, Nat. Geosci., 12, 712–717,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0431-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0431-6</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, Q., Miao, C., Duan, Q., Ashouri, H., Sorooshian, S., and Hsu, K.-L.: A
review of global precipitation datasets: Data sources, estimation, and
intercomparisons, Rev. Geophys., 56, 79–107,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017rg000574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017rg000574</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Szilagyi, J. and Schepers, A.: Coupled heat and vapor transport: The
thermostat effect of a freely evaporating land surface, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
41, 435–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013gl058979</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Szilagyi, J., Crago, R., and Qualls, R.: A calibration-free formulation of
the complementary relationship of evaporation for continental-scale
hydrology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 264–278,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025611</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Szilagyi, J.: On the thermodynamics foundations of the complementary
relationship of evaporation, J. Hydrol., 593, 125916,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125916</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tramontana, G., Jung, M., Schwalm, C. R., Ichii, K., Camps-Valls, G., Ráduly, B., Reichstein, M., Arain, M. A., Cescatti, A., Kiely, G., Merbold, L., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sickert, S., Wolf, S., and Papale, D.: Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms, Biogeosciences, 13, 4291–4313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., and Kiehl, J.: Earth's global energy
budget, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 311–324,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Trenberth, K. E., Smith, L., Qian, T., Dai, A., and Fasullo, J.: Estimates
of the global water Budget and its annual cycle using observational and
model data, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 758–769,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM600.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM600.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, W., Xiao, W., Cao, C., Gao, Z., Hu, Z., Liu, S., Shen, S., Wang, L.,
Xiao, Q., Xu, J., Yang D., and Lee X.: Temporal and spatial variations in
radiation and energy balance across a large freshwater lake in China, J.
Hydrol., 511, 811–824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.012</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, H., Yang, D., Lei, Z., and Sun, F.: New analytical derivation of the
mean annual water balance equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, W03410,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006135</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y. and Roderick, M. L.: Radiation, surface temperature and
evaporation over wet surfaces, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 145, 1118–1129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, K., Zhu, G., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Shang, S., and Gu, C.: Parameter
analysis and estimates for the MODIS evapotranspiration algorithm and
multiscale verification, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2211–2231,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023485</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, L. and Brutsaert, W.: Blending the evaporation precipitation ratio
with the complementary principle function for the prediction of evaporation,
Water Resour. Res., 57, e2021WR029729, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029729" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029729</a>,
2021

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., McVicar, T. R., Chiew, F. H., Vaze,
J., Liu, C., Lu, X., Zheng, H., Wang, Y., and Liu, Y. Y.: Multi-decadal
trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components, Sci.
Rep., 6, 19124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19124</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, S., Williams, A. P., Berg, A. M., Cook, B. I., Zhang, Y., Hagemann,
S., Lorenz, R., Seneviratne, S. I., and Gentine, P.: Land–atmosphere
feedbacks exacerbate concurrent soil drought and atmospheric aridity, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 18848–18853,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904955116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904955116</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
