<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-26-1565-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Continuous monitoring of a soil aquifer treatment system's physico-chemical conditions to optimize operational performance</article-title><alt-title>Monitoring a SAT system's physico-chemical conditions for performance optimization </alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Monitoring a SAT system's physico-chemical conditions for performance optimization }?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T. Turkeltaub et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Turkeltaub</surname><given-names>Tuvia</given-names></name>
          <email>tuviat@bgu.ac.il</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Furman</surname><given-names>Alex</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Mannheim</surname><given-names>Ron</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weisbrod</surname><given-names>Noam</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-9472</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Environmental Hydrology and Microbiology, Zuckerberg
Institute for Water Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert
Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, Midreshet
Ben-Gurion 84990, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Faculty of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Tuvia Turkeltaub (tuviat@bgu.ac.il)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>March</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>1565</fpage><lpage>1578</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Tuvia Turkeltaub et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e114">Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) is a tertiary process for wastewater treatment, where the wastewater infiltrates through a thick vadose zone for purification and storage in the underneath aquifer. SAT infiltration basins are typically flooded intermittently, while maintaining a fixed ratio between the wetting and the drying stages. However, infiltration basins exhibit different physical and chemical properties, limiting the generalization of SAT operation to attain optimal efficiency. Since frequent sampling of the soil pore water to verify the SAT's biodegradation efficiency can be arduous, continuous monitoring of the SAT vadose zone's physico-chemical conditions is required. In this study, redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was continuously monitored, together with other variables, such as volumetric water content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), soil temperature, and gaseous oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), at multiple depths of a SAT vadose zone throughout the year and while the system was constrained to different operational modes. Hydrological models were calibrated and validated to water content observations, and they illustrated the seasonal changes in water infiltration. Furthermore, it was shown that, under long wetting stages during winter, there was a reduction in the SAT's drainage capabilities. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, under long wetting stages, demonstrated larger variability and very negative values as ambient temperature increased. Assembling the daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations illustrated that a wetting stage should cease after about 30 h, once suboxic conditions are established. A drying stage's optimal duration should be 36 h, according to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations during summer and winter. Ultimately, the study shows that the length of wetting and drying stages should be defined separately, rather than by adhering to the wetting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> drying ratio.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="specialsection"><title>Highlights</title>
    

      <p id="d1e201"><list list-type="bullet">
        <?xmltex \notforhtml{\item[~]}?>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d1e208">Long wetting stages reduce soil percolation capabilities during winter.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d1e214">Redox and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>  display intensive dynamics in the top 25 cm of the soil aquifer treatment vadose zone.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d1e229">Optimal wetting and drying stages are defined according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d1e255">The length of wetting and drying stages should be defined separately rather than by adhering to their ratio.</p>
        </list-item>
      </list></p>
  </notes>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e268">Worldwide water scarcity has motivated the development of alternative water
resources such as the reuse of treated wastewater. Soil aquifer treatment
(SAT) is commonly implemented to further improve the recovered water's
quality and remove the majority of suspended matter, microorganisms,
viruses, and organic and inorganic constituents (Dillon, 2005; Goren et al., 2014; Massmann et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2011; Tsangaratos et al., 2017). In SAT systems, the treated wastewater is recharged to the underlying aquifer by surface spreading over infiltration basins. The wastewater is purified mainly through the physical and biochemical processes that occur during water passage through the vadose zone (Dillon, 2005; Elkayam et al., 2015).
Although SAT systems have been used for decades (Grinshpan et al.,
2021; Bouwer, 2002), the ability to estimate and predict a SAT system's
performance is still challenging, and the optimal SAT operation is still
under investigation (Ben Moshe et al., 2020; Sharma and Kennedy, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e271">A major uncertainty in SAT systems concerns the vadose zone processes that
play a central role in determining the quality of the water that recharges
the aquifer (Elkayam et al., 2015). The chemistry of the percolating wastewater changes due to a combination of several biogeochemical processes, such as organic matter biodegradation, nitrification, sorption, cation exchange, etc. (Amy and Drewes, 2007; Díaz-Cruz and Barceló, 2008; Goren et al., 2014; Miller et al., 2006; Tufenkji et al., 2003). Most of the organic matter is removed by biodegradation (i.e. microbial activity) within the upper two metres of the vadose zone  (Drewes, 2009). Nevertheless, the microbial activity is greatly affected by the soil water content, which frequently changes in SAT. Generally, a major challenge in SAT systems is to facilitate the intrusion of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, primarily in the gaseous phase, and to enrich the active subsurface with O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ben Moshe et al., 2020; Massmann et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e292">A consequence of the perturbation in the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supply to SAT is expressed in changes in the redox conditions (Mächler et al., 2013; Rezanezhad et al., 2014). Redox potential or oxidation reduction potential is a quantitative measure of electron availability, i.e. the tendency of the system to receive or donate electrons (Hinchey and Schaffner, 2005).
Substantial changes in SAT systems' redox conditions might lead to the
release of undesirable metals, such as Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Goren et al., 2012), and affect the degradation rates of pesticides and pharmaceutical substances  (Massmann et al., 2006). Additionally, previous studies have illustrated the possible degradation of groundwater quality due to the emergence of contaminants that leach from the SAT vadose zone under reducing conditions (Asano and Cotruvo, 2004; Massmann et al., 2006; Oren et al., 2007; Sharma and Kennedy, 2017). Redox processes are associated with the degradation of organic matter by terminal electron acceptors or redox couples, such as O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, MnO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Mn<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S, in sequential order from the highest energy yield downwards (Berner, 1981; Froelich et al., 1979; Christensen et al., 2000). The transition between redox conditions is determined by the presence and availability of these electron acceptors/donors. Once the strongest oxidizing species (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is depleted, the next strongest oxidizing species is
used (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and so on. The alternation between oxic  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 400 mV), suboxic (between 400 and 100 mV), and anoxic (100 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions in the vadose zone depends on the availability of the oxidized species  (Reddy et al., 1998). In addition, studies have reported on the seasonal (temperature changes) effects on redox conditions, which were attributed to the increase in dissolved oxygen concentrations at low temperatures  (Massmann et al., 2006) and the greater microbial activity (i.e. higher O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption) at higher temperatures (Greskowiak et al., 2006;
Kirschbaum, 1995).</p>
      <p id="d1e506">An important operational aspect of a SAT system is the intermittent application of the effluents (Sattar, 2016; Sallwey et al., 2020). After the infiltration basin is flooded with wastewater, a drying period is implemented to sustain the SAT's infiltration capacity and biochemical capabilities  (Sharma and Kennedy, 2017). The wetting and drying stages, which can be expressed by the wet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dry ratio parameter, have a critical impact on the removal rates of dissolved organic carbon, total nitrogen, and pathogens
(Ben Moshe et al., 2020; Morrison et al., 2020; Sharma and Kennedy, 2017).
Although the wet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dry ratio can vary depending on location and  wastewater quality, it is well accepted that it should be below 1.0 (Sattar,
2016; Sharma and Kennedy, 2017). Nevertheless, infiltration basins behave
differently with regard to infiltration rates and clogging. Thus, in many
cases, the SAT operational efficiency is limited to the personal experience
of the operators and their knowledge of the specific infiltration basin  (Sharma and Kennedy, 2017). Note, however, that several studies (e.g. Ben Moshe et al., 2021) suggest that it is not the wet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dry ratio that should be considered but specific times for wetting and drying.</p>
      <p id="d1e531">The oxidation reduction potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), together with chemical and
physical parameters, such as water content, soil temperature, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration, etc., can be continuously monitored by installing the
relevant sensors. Previous studies have implemented the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor and
successfully described, with high temporal resolution, the subsurface
chemical conditions in various environments, such as wetlands, the
groundwater (or the capillary fringe), aquifers, etc. (Wallace
et al., 2019; McMahon and Chapelle, 2008; Shenker et al., 2005; Silver et
al., 2018; Rezanezhad et al., 2014). To improve SAT system performances, the
link between the wetting and drying stages and the subsequent redox conditions developed in the subsurface should be established. Thus, in situ
monitoring can improve SAT management performance and reduce the subjectivity of the operator. The objective of this study was to examine the temporal variability in redox potential and the way it is affected by changes in volumetric water content, gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and climate imposed by different operational modes of wetting and drying stages. Furthermore, calibrated and validated hydrological models were used to explore the behaviour of water fluxes under different operational modes and seasonal temperature changes. Finally, the optimal lengths of a drying stage and a wetting stage were determined, following the in situ observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study sites</title>
      <p id="d1e589">The Dan Region Reclamation Project (Shafdan) reclaims about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of effluent annually from the Tel Aviv metropolitan area in Israel. The treatment of effluents occurs in two stages. The first stage involves mechanical biological treatment, which is based on activated sludge, while, in the second stage, the treated water (a secondary effluent) is delivered to infiltration basins, as part of the SAT system, to further improve water
quality. The six infiltration basin sites, covering a total area of 1053 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, are located in central Israel, overlying the coastal aquifer (Fig. 1). Each basin is divided into several spreading ponds, about 1500 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> each, which are alternately flooded. The vadose zone that underlies the basins is mostly composed of sand, sandy loam soil, and calcareous sandstone layers. Typically, the ponds are flooded for 1 to 2 d (max hydraulic head of about 50 cm), followed by 2 to 6 d of drainage and soil surface drying. The wetting and drying stages are controlled by the ponds' flooding order, the availability of effluent, and the drying period, which is suggested to be at least 24 h  (Icekson-Tal et al., 2003). The basin surface is ploughed on a regular basis to break up the developed biocrust and to prevent clogging (see  Negev et al.,
2020, for details).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Study operation</title>
      <p id="d1e644">In this research, two in situ measurement stations were installed in an
infiltration pond during 2018 (pond 4103 in the Yavne 1 cluster;
Fig. 1). Each station was equipped with several sets of sensors at 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 cm depth, including time domain transmittance (TDT) probes (Acclima Inc., Idaho, USA), copper–constantan thermocouples (Omega Engineering Inc., CT, USA), oxidation reduction potential (ORP) electrodes (ELH016; Van London Co., Houston, TX, USA), and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> percentage probes (SO-421 sensor; Apogee Instruments, Utah, USA). Data were collected at prescribed intervals and logged on a CR1000 data logger (Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT, USA). In addition, suction cups were installed at similar depths. In station 1 (Fig. 1), the data consisted of volumetric water content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), soil temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and ORP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) time series, which were continuously measured every 20 min between 28 July 2020 and 10 February 2021 (a total of 14 185 values, over 197 d, for each variable). The data
were obtained at 25, 50, and 100 cm depths. In station 2 (Fig. 1), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, gaseous oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  were measured every 20 min between 8 May 2019 and 20 July 2020. There were about 60 d in which data were not collected in station 2 due to technical issues. The data from station 2 contained 27 222 points of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 29 394 points of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 30 414 points of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 26 730 points of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements. In station 2, the data were collected at 25, 50, 75, and 100 cm depths.</p>
      <p id="d1e751">The water quality characteristics of the secondary effluent that flooded the
Yavne 1 basin are presented in the Supplement (Fig. S1). Note that the quality parameter concentrations conform to the updated Inbar regulations (Inbar, 2007) and the findings of a previous study that surveyed numerous wastewater storage and treatment reservoirs across the country (Kfir et al., 2012). To determine the soil physical properties, undisturbed soil cores were sampled at different depths. Subsequently, flow experiments were carried out to calculate the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), based on Darcy's law (Fig. S2). Additionally, particle size distribution (PSD) analyses are presented in Fig. S3. The PSD results indicate that the SAT vadose zone is homogeneous.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e756">The location of the investigated site – the Yavne 1 infiltration
basin of the Shafdan. In the magnified view of the investigated pond, the yellow circles represent the locations of the measurement stations (© Google Earth).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Hydrological model and gaseous oxygen dynamics</title>
      <p id="d1e773">The calculations for water and oxygen fluxes in the SAT vadose zone are
calculated differently for the ponding stage and for the stage, where there
is no ponding (water) on the soil surface. For the ponding stage, Ganot et al. (2017) showed that the infiltration rates in managed aquifer recharge systems can be predicted reasonably well by simple analytical models. In this study, the Green–Ampt equation for infiltration into a flooded soil was implemented to calculate the water flux as follows (Bouwer, 2002):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ks</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (L T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the water flux, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (L) is the ponding depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (L) is the thickness of the saturated vadose zone, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L) is the
negative pressure head at the wetting front. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed here to
be constant, the subsurface is assumed to be homogeneous, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
assumed to vary with time only. As the wetting front progresses, the gradient approaches a value of unity, and the infiltration rate becomes equal to the hydraulic conductivity of the wetted zone. Once the water ponding ceases, the water drainage is set equal to the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, described with an exponential form as follows (Guswa et al., 2002):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M68" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ks</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where Ks (L T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a parameter of the soil, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the volumetric water content, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the water content at field capacity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the saturated water content. Furthermore, the effect of temperature changes on the soil hydraulic conductivity is implemented through the change in viscosity as follows (Lin et al., 2003):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M80" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ks</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ks</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where Ks<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ks<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are soil hydraulic conductivity values at
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the dynamic viscosity of water (M L<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> T<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) values at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e1182">An inverse problem was set to find an optimal combination of Ks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters that minimizes the following objective function:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are the observations at a specific time, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(t<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,b) are the
corresponding models' (Eqs. 1 to 3) predictions for the vector of optimized
parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The inverse problem was solved using the
fminsearch function in MATLAB. To evaluate the prediction quality, the root mean squared error (RMSE), the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and the Pearson correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated following Ritter and Muñoz-Carpena (2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1327">The water level measurements at the soil surface were collected by the
Shafdan operators as part of the operational routine. Analysis of the water
level data (ponding depth) indicates two operational modes of long and short
cycles that were implemented at the investigated pond. The characteristics
of the drying and wetting stages, as recorded by the operators, are summarized in Table 1. Note that the wetting stage is defined when water is present at the soil surface and the drying stage is defined when water is absent. Further note that the water level is measured at a single point (close to the pond inlet). Therefore, some variations, at the order of a few centimetres may exist due to microtopography and the distance between the inlet and the far parts of the pond. This may lead to some delays in water arrival or recession from the stations. Throughout the analysis described below, we define the winter period as the months between November and April and the summer period as the months between May and October, corresponding to the Mediterranean climate. Our monitoring systems are operated independently from the Shafdan facilities.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1333">Technical information of the recorded long and short wetting and
drying cycles (these data were provided by the Shafdan operators).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Long</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Short</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">cycles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">cycles</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wetting stage (d)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Drying stage (d)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of recorded cycles</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Length of cycle (d)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wet / dry ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Hydrological conditions</title>
      <p id="d1e1498">A representative set of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> time series measured in the SAT's vadose
zone is presented to describe the variability in hydrological conditions
measured throughout different seasons and operational modes (Fig. 2). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were obtained during long (Fig. 2a, b, c) and short
(Fig. 2d) cycles at three different depths. Note that the water content measurements presented in Fig. 2a and b were recorded at station 2 (Fig. 1)
during summer (Fig. 2a) and winter (Fig. 2b). The water content variations under short cycles were measured at station 1 (Fig. 2c, d). Differences in the absolute values between the water content observations at different depths are mainly related to the vertical texture variability (Fig. S2). Under the long cycles, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were obtained throughout 19 cycles during summer (May–October) and 14 cycles during winter (November–April). Under short cycles, there were 12 cycles during
summer and 25 during winter.</p>
      <p id="d1e1522">Every recorded wetting event prompted an intensive infiltration that was
expressed by a rapid and almost instantaneous increase in water content at
all depths and under the two operational modes (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the soil remained at similar level of saturation throughout each wetting stage. Similarly, once the drying process started, it occurred virtually simultaneously at all depths. There were noticeable differences in the drainage rates between summer and winter, where the soil dried faster in summer. To elaborate the drainage process, the drying stages were assembled and averaged at an hourly interval and separated into short (Fig. 3a) and long (Fig. 3b) cycles. Additionally, Eqs. (1), (2), and (3) (the hydrological model) were implemented to describe the water flow in the SAT's vadose zone under long and short cycles. The hydrological models were calibrated and validated against water content observations at 25 cm depth by adjusting the Ks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters (Figs. S4 and S5; Table 2). Throughout the calibration, the Ks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters attained different values for
the long cycle periods and the short cycle periods (Table 2). There are differences in soil physical properties between stations 1 and 2, which explains the need for calibrating different parameter sets. In addition, the calibrated Ks values for both models were substantially lower than the measured Ks values (Fig. S2; Table 2). It has been shown that Ks measurements in the field are commonly lower than lab Ks measurements   (Nimmo et al., 2009). This is related to a reduction in soil conductivity due to air trapping in the soil pores during the wetting process when water is applied at the land surface (Mizrahi et al., 2016; Nimmo et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e1539">Under the short cycles, the soil drainage process occurred mostly within the
first 15 h of the drying stage (Fig. 3a). The soil drainage rate was slightly higher in summer than in winter. Under the short cycles, the model successfully followed the observed trends, where the validation period showed similar performances (Figs. S4, 3a). The model results for the short cycles
confirm that the differences in drainage between summer and winter are
mainly due to temperature changes that affect water viscosity (Lin et al., 2003). During the long cycle application, the drainage rates in summer showed a moderate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decline compared to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under short cycles (Fig. 3b). This might be due to the differences in soil physical parameters between stations 1 and 2, as highlighted by the calibrated models' parameters (Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e1556">While the model under long cycles successfully followed the drainage trend
during summer, the model showed poor performance during winter under long
cycles. This is mainly due to the observable changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, which displayed a shift towards higher values from November
2019 (Figs. S5 and 2b). To explore the changes in the SAT's physical properties, an additional parameter set was calibrated against the winter data only during the long cycles (Fig. 3b; green line). Both the Ks and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameters attained lower values, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased (Fig. S6; Table 2). Previous studies related the accumulation of organic matter in SAT to lower rates of organic matter decomposition during winter (Nadav et al., 2012, 2021a, b; Arye et al., 2011). The authors ruled out the occurrence of soil clogging and indicated that the accumulation of organic matter at the topsoil increased the degree of soil water repellency or soil hydrophobicity. This phenomenon often develops in sandy soils (commonly used in SAT) due to the low specific surface area of sand (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0077 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) compared to clay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 900 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; Doerr et al., 2000; Wallis and Horne, 1992). Thus, only a small amount of organic matter is required to coat the particles of the sand in order to develop soil water repellency (Wallis and Horne, 1992). Arye et al. (2011) showed that soil hydrophobicity is attributed to the reduction in the liquid surface tension and increase in the contact angle. These changes in soil properties are related to the reduction in the soil permeability (Nadav et al., 2012b). It appears that long wetting and drying cycles in SAT during winter can alter the physical soil properties, which eventually affect the infiltration capabilities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1626">Representative time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements obtained at
station 2 (Fig. 1) during <bold>(a)</bold> summer and <bold>(b)</bold> winter under long wetting and drying cycles at three different depths. The black line represents the surface water hydraulic head. The bottom plots display
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements obtained at station 1 under <bold>(c)</bold> long and <bold>(d)</bold> short wetting and drying cycles during the summer.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1665">Estimated parameters of the hydrological models.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Station 1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Station 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Station 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(winter only)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ks (cm h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.72</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1879">The average and standard deviation values of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
25 cm depth throughout the drying stages at an hourly timescale. <bold>(a)</bold> Short cycles (station 1) and <bold>(b)</bold> long cycles (station 2) are shown. The blue and red circles represent the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values collected during winter (November–April) and summer (May–October), respectively. The statistics of measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> under long cycles are based on 19 drying stages during summer and 14 drying stages during winter. For the short cycles, the statistics are based on 12 drying stages during summer and 24 drying stages during winter. The dashed black and solid grey lines represent the average values of simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> throughout the drying stage during winter (November–April) and summer (May–October), respectively. Note that, for the long cycle periods, an additional model was established based only on winter data (green line).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Seasonal differences in SAT redox ($E_{{h}}$) conditions under long wetting cycles}?><title>Seasonal differences in SAT redox (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions under long wetting cycles</title>
      <p id="d1e1944"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were monitored at four depths (Fig. 4a, b). The behaviour of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dynamic following a wetting event was similar for the summer and the winter periods. At 25, 50, and 75 cm depths, a gradual decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> started only after a time lag from the beginning of a wetting event
(Fig. 4a, b). This time lag can be explained by the presence of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the percolating solution. Once the DO is depleted, suboxic and anoxic conditions begin to develop (Dutta et al., 2015; Ben Moshe et al., 2021, 2020). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions at 25 cm were the most highly responsive to the wetting events, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were the most negative at this depth (Fig. 4a, b). At 100 cm depth, only minor changes were observed, and in some cases (during winter), no changes were observed (Fig. 4a, b). According to the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements (Fig. 4c, d), there were partially aerated conditions (unsaturated conditions) during some of the flooding events at 75 cm depth, while at 150 cm depth, unsaturated conditions prevailed continuously throughout the period of measurements. Therefore, the small changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 100 cm depth could either have been the outcome of only minor biochemical activity or they could have been due to the sufficient oxygen supply. Gorski et al. (2019) suggested that, in coarse-grained soils, due to the high infiltration rates, the DO is delivered rapidly by the percolating water to the base of the saturated zone. Thus, the soil microbes do not have enough time to consume the DO. In the current study, it is reflected by positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 100 cm depth (Fig. 4a, b). As the wetting cycle continues, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions at 100 cm depth decrease, mainly during summer (Fig. 4a, b). This indicates that eventually the infiltrated water that reaches 100 cm depth contains lower concentrations of DO. Yet, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions do not show a further decrease, which can be attributed to limited microbial activity. Previous studies showed that carbon availability at greater depths of the vadose zone is a dominant factor for this limitation (Grau-martínez et al., 2017, 2018; Brettar et al., 2002). Furthermore, the monitored <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions illustrate that most of the activity in SAT systems occurs at the topsoil, as illustrated in previous studies (e.g. Quanrud et al., 1996, 2003; Sopilniak et al., 2017; Grinshpan et al., 2022). Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery time, i.e. an increase towards positive values, was virtually instantaneous once the drying process initiated (Fig. 4a, b). The increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions occurred concurrently with the observed rapid increase of the gaseous oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the vadose zone (Fig. 4c, d).</p>
      <p id="d1e2098">A distinct difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions between winter and summer at 25 cm depth is expressed by a more negative range of values during summer
(Fig. 4a, b). Since similar wastewater quality and hydraulic loads were fed to the pond during summer and winter (see the Supplement), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were mainly affected by the SAT's aeration state and seasonal temperature changes. In Fig. 5, the monthly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions at 25 cm depth are presented in the form of a box plot, together with the monthly average ambient temperature (dashed black line) and monthly average global radiation (grey line). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions showed a wider range of values with the increase in temperature (Fig. 5). Between November and March, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions mostly remained above zero or were slightly negative
(Fig. 5). Once the temperature increased above 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between May and October, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions showed substantial fluctuation between negative and positive values (Fig. 5). Note that the average monthly ambient temperatures during November and May were similar in value, but during
November, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions mostly remained above zero (Fig. 5). This difference is connected to the daylight duration, as indicated by the global radiation, which is substantially greater in May than in November (Fig. 5; grey line). A typical characteristic of aquatic systems is the large fluctuations in dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations due to intense photosynthesis and respiration (Stumm and Morgan, 1996). Goren et al. (2014) illustrated that following the effluent spreading in the infiltration ponds, photosynthesis enriches the water with DO. Furthermore, chemical analysis of porewater samples that were obtained at 0.5 m depth in the SAT vadose zone indicated the DO's substantial influence on the biochemical conditions of the percolating water (Goren et al., 2014). Thus, the photosynthesis process enriches the effluent with DO, which encourages further microbial activity  (Goren et al., 2014; Hargreaves, 2006; Rodríguez-Escales et al., 2020).
However, between July and September, there was a decrease in global radiation that did not affect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability (Fig. 5). Thus, it appears that, under long wetting stages, the seasonal temperature changes dominate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions but show some trade-off with the global radiation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2212">Representative time series of redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements obtained at station 2 (Fig. 1) at depths of 25, 50, and 100 cm. <bold>(a, c)</bold> Summer and <bold>(b, d)</bold> winter results are shown. Note that the grey and white areas indicate wetting and drying periods, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2250">Seasonal changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions as observed at 25 cm depth at station 2 under long (7 d) wetting periods. The dashed black line represents the monthly mean ambient temperature, and the solid grey line represents the monthly mean global radiation obtained from the Israeli
Meteorological Service (IMS, 2022).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{A comparison between SAT redox ($E_{{h}}$) conditions under long and short cycles}?><title>A comparison between SAT redox (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) conditions under long and short cycles</title>
      <p id="d1e2290">It has been shown that the operational mode affects the aeration conditions
of the upper vadose zone, which, consequently, might alter the infiltration
rates and the intensity of the biogeochemical processes (Goren et al., 2014). Throughout the measurement period, the intervals of wetting and drying stages were modified (Table 1). The wetting and drying stages were substantially shortened during September 2020, which enabled the examining of the differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions under short and long cycles. The variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions under long cycles during October 2019, December 2019, and January 2020 are presented in Fig. 6a and c. In addition, the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions under short cycles during September–October 2020, December 2020, and January 2021 are presented in Fig. 6b and d.</p>
      <p id="d1e2326">As was shown above, under long cycles, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions declined towards slightly negative values during winter and attained markedly negative values during the summer months at 25 and 50 cm depths, where only minor variations were observed at 100 cm depth (Fig. 6a, c). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  conditions, under short cycles during the summer, showed a decline towards slightly negative values for a brief time, compared to long cycles (Fig. 6a, b). During the winter, only minor variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were recorded under short cycles (Fig. 6d). Note that, at 100 cm depth, there was
almost no change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions for either season under short cycles
(Fig. 6b, d). As was illustrated previously (Fig. 4a, b), once the drying stage initiated, the recovery of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> towards positive values (oxic conditions) was almost instant under both short and long cycles. It appears that the re-establishment of oxic conditions occurs independently of the length of the wetting stage.</p>
      <p id="d1e2384">The observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> under long and short cycles indicate a weak relationship between the wetting and the drying stages. These results call into question the advantage of implementing the wet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> dry ratio for optimizing SAT performance. It appears that the length of a wetting stage and a drying stage should be defined separately (Ben Moshe et al., 2020, 2021). Thus, the necessary further investigation is described below to examine the optimal lengths of the wetting and drying stages.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2417">Representative time series of redox potential (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measurements at 25, 50, and 100 cm depths at station 1 (Fig. 1). <bold>(a, c)</bold> Long wetting periods and <bold>(b, d)</bold> short wetting periods are shown. Note that the grey and white areas indicate wetting and drying periods, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The length of the wetting stage according to $E_{{h}}$  measurements}?><title>The length of the wetting stage according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2463">During wetting stages, the main limiting factor of the biodegradation
process is the availability of dissolved oxygen (Skopp et al., 1990; Cook and Knight, 2003). Once the soil pores are fully saturated, only the dissolved oxygen (DO) of the percolating water is available. However, studies have
illustrated that the DO of the percolating water rapidly depletes
(Dutta et al., 2015; Ben Moshe et al., 2020, 2021). Thus, the wetting stage should cease when the DO no longer has an effect on the degradation process, i.e. when suboxic and anoxic conditions begin to develop. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements can provide a good indication for the time when such conditions begin to be established. For this purpose, the hourly measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions during the wetting stage of 33 recorded cycles (19 cycles during summer and 14 cycles during winter) were averaged for 25, 50, 75, and 100 cm depth (Fig. 7). The data were separated between winter (November–April) and summer (May–October), according to the trends presented in Fig. 5.</p>
      <p id="d1e2488">During summer, the decline in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions was steeper compared to
the trends exhibited in winter (Fig. 7). Following 30 h of wetting, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions during the summer dropped below 400 mV at 25 cm depth, which indicates the establishment of suboxic conditions (Fig. 7a). After 37 h, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations at 50 and 75 cm depths showed similar trends
(Fig. 7a). Note that, after 45 h the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations at 25 cm depth reach anoxic conditions. The differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements at topsoil and at deeper parts of the vadose zone were previously attributed to carbon availability, which decrease with depth (Brettar et al., 2002; Bohrerova et al., 2004). Furthermore, Brettar et al. (2002) provided a range of threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for the denitrifying conditions, depending on the
depth of the soil horizon. Similarly, despite the differences between the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements at 25 cm depth and at deeper depths (Fig. 7), all the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements potentially indicate similar activity. To prevent anoxic conditions in the SAT vadose zone during summer, the optimal length of a wetting stage, in terms of biodegradation, would be about 30 h (1.25 d). This is in agreement with Dutta et al. (2015), who suggested a relatively wide distribution of de-oxygenation times of between 0.36 and 1.5 d.</p>
      <p id="d1e2580">In winter, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements decrease towards suboxic conditions,
that occur after 51, 69, and 84 h of wetting at 25, 50, and 75 cm depths,
respectively (Fig. 7b). The delay in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> drop (compared to summer) is partly explained by the longer presence of gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SAT vadose zone (Figs. 4c, d and 8). It takes a longer time for the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to deplete during winter (Fig. 8), probably as a result of lower oxygen demand due to slower microbial activity at low temperatures (Kirschbaum, 1995). An
additional explanation for the longer presence of gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is due to a longer establishment of saturated conditions as a consequence of lower Ks values (see Sect. 3.1). However, once the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is absent from the
SAT vadose zone during winter (Fig. 8), no further decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions occurs (Fig. 7b). Therefore, the trade-off between nutrient transport rates and reaction rates should be considered, where the supply of the percolated effluent's substrate might be faster than the SAT's degradation capability (Greskowiak et al., 2006). Determining the length of a
wetting stage during winter, using solely the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements, may be challenging. Nevertheless, the changes in soil physical
parameters and the seasonal differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values imply low biodegradation rates during winter. From a practical perspective, the
observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at 25 cm depth during winter are compared with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  measurements during summer. Using a two-sample <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> test shows that the differences in the first 28 h of a wetting cycle are insignificant. It
suggests that the length of a wetting stage during winter should be no more
than 30 h, as in the summer period. Nevertheless, given the evidences
that are reflected in the measurements of the current study and conclusions
from previous studies, the implementation of SAT during winter is questionable. It might be necessary to store the effluents in reservoirs
during winter and apply the SAT during summer.</p>
      <p id="d1e2715">According to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor at 100 cm, suboxic conditions prevail for
most times during winter and a moderate decrease (compared to the other
sensors) in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions is noticeable during summer (Fig. 7). The gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations at 75 cm indicate depletion of gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer and a very low O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (2 %) during winter (Fig. 8c). At 150 cm, the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations suggest that, for most of the recorded wetting cycles, unsaturated conditions prevailed
(Fig. 8d). It is not clear if the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions at 100 cm are determined by a continuous supply of oxygen, given the unsaturated conditions. This might affect the decision concerning the optimal length of a wetting cycle. However, previous studies (Miller et al., 2006; Fox et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2008; Goren et al., 2014; Sopilniak et al., 2018; Essandoh et al., 2013; Quanrud et al., 1996, 2003) and a recent study by our group  (Grinshpan et al., 2022) suggest that most biodegradation activity occurs at topsoil, and there is a steep reduction in removal capabilities with depth. Thus, the potential contribution of the deeper vadose zone to the SAT treatment should be further investigated.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2790">Plot of hourly means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements obtained at station
2, from the beginning of the wetting stages, at three depths. The statistics
are based on 19 cycles during summer (May–October) and 14 cycles during
winter (November–April) that were observed in <bold>(a)</bold> winter and <bold>(b)</bold> summer. Note that the data are separated between summer and winter according to the trends presented in Fig. 5. The green, grey, and
yellow areas represent the oxic (400 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), suboxic (400 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 mV), and anoxic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 mV) conditions, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2869">Plot of hourly means of gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from the
beginning of the wetting stages at <bold>(a)</bold> 25, <bold>(b)</bold> 50, <bold>(c)</bold> 75, and <bold>(d)</bold> 150 cm depths. The statistics are based on 14 cycles during winter (November–April) and 19 cycles during summer (May–October) that were observed at multiple depths in station 2. Note that the data are separated between summer and winter according to the trends presented in Fig. 5.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The length of the drying stage using $E_{{h}}$ and gaseous O${}_{{2}}$
measurements}?><title>The length of the drying stage using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2928">The drying stage in SAT systems is implemented to restore the infiltration,
biological, and chemical capabilities of the pond, mainly by aerating the
soil (Sharma and Kennedy, 2017). A drying stage is defined as the stage in which there is no water at the soil surface, and the observed volumetric water contents begin to decrease (Fig. 2). To determine the optimal time for a drying stage, both the averaged values of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9a, b) and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9c, d) observations during the drying stages are presented. Note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements were conducted at 25, 50,
75, and 100 cm depths, and the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations were obtained at 25, 50,
75, and 150 cm depths (Fig. 9). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data during the drying stages were separated between winter (November–April) and summer (May–October), according to the trends presented in Fig. 5.</p>
      <p id="d1e2992">Slower aeration rates and larger variability were observed during winter
compared to summer (Fig. 9a, b). Furthermore, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery is clearly dominated by the rates of the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> intrusion to the soil (Fig. 9c, d). During winter, the aeration rates are different at each depth, but in general, the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increase moderately with time
(Fig. 9a). The recovery of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions display comparable trends (Fig. 9c). Although the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor at 50 cm depth suggest a faster O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> intrusion rate compared to the other sensors (Fig. 9a), it is not
expressed in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recovery time (Fig. 9c). During summer all the observed O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> curves show steep recovery that ceases after about 20 h (Fig. 9b). According to the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> intrusion process at 50 and 75 cm depths starts at the very beginning of the drying stage, while at 25 and 100 cm depths there is a 2 h delay (Fig. 9b). Nevertheless, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions recovery is comparable at all depths (Fig. 9d).</p>
      <p id="d1e3103">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations illustrate that the re-establishment of oxic conditions in the SAT vadose zone is similar during winter and summer
(Fig. 9c, d). Once the drying stage started, it required about 36 h for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions to reach values in the range of oxic conditions, regardless of the initial value of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (Fig. 9c, d). However, a recent study has indicated that using solely the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to quantify soil aeration status might be inaccurate for some conditions (Ben-Noah et al., 2021). Instead, the authors suggested using the Damköhler number, which is the ratio between characteristic diffusion (i.e. oxygen supply) and soil respiration times. A small Damköhler number would indicate that the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> consumption rate is lower than the O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> supply. Thus, although during summer the oxygen supply rate is relatively high compared to winter (Fig. 9a, b), the oxygen consumption rate for soil
respiration is expected to be substantially higher during summer than during
winter (Kirschbaum, 1995), as it is reflected by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (Figs. 5 and  7). Therefore, in parallel to proper treatment of aeration time, optimal wetting time should be further treated.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3181">Plot of hourly means of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements
from the beginning of the drying stages. The statistics are based on <bold>(a, c)</bold> 14 cycles during winter (November–April) and <bold>(b, d)</bold> 19 cycles during summer (May–October). Note that the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a, b)</bold> measurements were obtained at 25, 50, 75, and 150 cm depths, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions <bold>(c, d)</bold> were observed at 25, 50, 75, and 100 cm depths. All observations were conducted in station 2. The data are separated between summer and winter according to the trends presented in Fig. 5. The green, grey, and yellow areas represent the oxic (400 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), suboxic
(400 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 mV), and anoxic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 mV) conditions, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/26/1565/2022/hess-26-1565-2022-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3304">Continuous monitoring of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
vadose zones of SAT infiltration ponds was carried out for about 600 d. SAT operation was subjected to long and short wetting and drying cycles and seasonal changes. The datasets enabled the examination of factors that control the hydrological and geochemical conditions in SAT. Calibrated and
validated hydrological models were applied to investigate the water flow dynamics in the SAT vadose zone. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations
were averaged to determine seasonal changes and deduce the optimal length of
wetting and drying stages.</p>
      <p id="d1e3362">The examination of the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions illustrated a noticeable decline to markedly negative values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>450 mV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) during summer and to values between 0 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV during winter. These <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were established following 30 h of wetting, and no considerable changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions were noticeable until the wetting stages ceased. A monthly statistic of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements illustrated the relationship between the size of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amplitude and the seasonal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes. Furthermore, it is speculated that the limited decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions during winter was due to lower microbial activity. An additional support for this claim is the reduction in
infiltration capabilities following long wetting and drying cycles during
winter, as was indicated by the hydrological models. To define the optimal
length of a wetting stage, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data were averaged and separated
between the winter and summer periods. During the summer period, the optimal
time length of a wetting stage, according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, is about
30 h. Determining the optimal length of a wetting stage during winter is
challenging. Practically, there are no significant differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions during winter and summer for the first 28 h of wetting. Thus, the length of a wetting stage during winter should be 30 h, as in the summer period.</p>
      <p id="d1e3497">The length of a drying stage, following the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, should
be about 36 h, regardless of the initial values of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and the season. Note that, during summer, a longer drying time is required for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions to attain suboxic conditions. Nevertheless, the gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations indicated faster aeration rates during summer, which compensate for the very negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and allow fast recovery. Following our analysis, we suggest that, under the tested conditions, the length of a drying stage should be 36 h for winter and summer. Shorter drying stages would affect SAT efficiency, while applying longer drying stages would reduce the total hydraulic loads that can be fed to the infiltration basin.</p>
      <p id="d1e3553">Implementing in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and gaseous O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensors
provided continuous high-resolution observations. These datasets revealed
the hydrological and biochemical dynamics in SAT as imposed by seasonal and
operational changes. Analysis of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements
enabled the identification of the optimal time lengths of wetting and drying
stages. The results indicated that there is no direct relationship between
the length of a wetting stage and a drying stage. Thus, the operational use
of a wetting/drying ratio in SAT management should be reconsidered.</p>
</sec><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3614">The MATLAB scripts and the data that were used for this study are available for public download at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032</ext-link> (Turkeltaub, 2022).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3620">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1565-2022-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1565-2022-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3629">RM, AF, and NW designed the experiments. RM provided and analyzed the field data. TT analyzed the data and prepared the paper with contribution of all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3635">The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3641">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3647">This work has been supported within the framework of the German–Israeli Water Technology Cooperation Program (grant no. WT1601/2689), by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), by the Israel Ministry of Science,
Technology and Space (MOST), and by the Goldinger Trust, Jewish Federation of Delaware.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3653">This paper was edited by Gerrit H. de Rooij and reviewed by Ofer Dahan and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amy, G. and Drewes, J.: Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) as a natural and
sustainable wastewater reclamation/reuse technology: Fate of wastewater
effluent organic Matter (EfoM) and trace organic compounds, Environ. Monit.
Assess., 129, 19–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9421-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-006-9421-4</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arye, G., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Treated wastewater effects on water
repellency and soil hydraulic properties of soil aquifer treatment
infiltration basins, J. Hydrol., 397, 136–145,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.046" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.046</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Asano, T. and Cotruvo, J. A.: Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal
wastewater: Health and regulatory considerations, Water Res., 38,
1941–1951, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.023</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., Barquero, F., Sallwey, J., Orgad, O., and Furman, A.: On the role of operational dynamics in biogeochemical efficiency of a soil aquifer treatment system, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 417–426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-417-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-417-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., and Furman, A.: Optimization of soil aquifer
treatment (SAT) operation using a reactive transport model, Vadose Zone J.,
20, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/vzj2.20095</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ben-Noah, I., Nitsan, I., Cohen, B., Kaplan, G., and Friedman, S. P.: Soil
aeration using air injection in a citrus orchard with shallow groundwater,
Agr. Water Manage., 245, 106664,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106664</ext-link>, 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berner, R. A.: A new geochemical classification of sedimentary environments,
J. Sediment. Perol., 51, 359–365,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7C7F-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1306/212F7C7F-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</ext-link>,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bohrerova, Z., Stralkova, R., Podesvova, J., Bohrer, G., and Pokorny, E.:
The relationship between redox potential and nitrification under different
sequences of crop rotations, Soil Till. Res., 77, 25–33,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.still.2003.10.006</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouwer, H.: Artificial recharge of groundwater: Hydrogeology and
engineering, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 121–142,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brettar, I., Sanchez-Perez, J. M., and Trémolières, M.: Nitrate
elimination by denitrification in hardwood forest soils of the Upper Rhine
floodplain – Correlation with redox potential and organic matter,
Hydrobiologia, 469, 11–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015527611350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1015527611350</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Christensen, T. H., Bjerg, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Jakobsen, R., Heron, G.,
and Albrechtsen, H. J.: Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater
contaminant plumes, J. Contam. Hydrol., 45, 165–241,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00109-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00109-1</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cook, F. J. and Knight, J. H.: Oxygen Transport to Plant Roots, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 67, 20–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.2000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2003.2000</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Díaz-Cruz, M. S. and Barceló, D.: Trace organic chemicals
contamination in ground water recharge, Chemosphere, 72, 333–342,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.031</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dillon, P.: Future management of aquifer recharge, Hydrogeol. J., 13,
313–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A., and Walsh, R. P. D.: Soil water repellency:
Its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance, Earth
Sci. Rev., 51, 33–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Drewes, J. E.: Ground water replenishment with recycled water – Water
quality improvements during managed aquifer recharge, Ground Water, 47,
502–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00587_5.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00587_5.x</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dutta, T., Carles-Brangarí, A., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Rubol, S.,
Tirado-Conde, J., and Sanchez-Vila, X.: Vadose zone oxygen (O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) dynamics
during drying and wetting cycles: An artificial recharge laboratory
experiment, J. Hydrol., 527, 151–159,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.048</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Elkayam, R., Sopliniak, A., Gasser, G., Pankratov, I., and Lev, O.: Oxidizer
Demand in the Unsaturated Zone of a Surface-Spreading Soil Aquifer Treatment
System, Vadose Zone J., 14, vzj2015.03.0047,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.03.0047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2015.03.0047</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Essandoh, H. M. K., Tizaoui, C., and Mohamed, M. H. A.: Removal of dissolved
organic carbon and nitrogen during simulated soil aquifer treatment, Water
Res., 47, 3559–3572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Fox, P., Aboshanp, W., and Alsamadi, B.:  Analysis of soils to demonstrate sustained organic carbon removal during soil aquifer treatment, J. Environ. Qual., 34, 156–163, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath,
G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.:
Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern
equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 43,
1075–1090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ganot, Y., Holtzman, R., Weisbrod, N., Nitzan, I., Katz, Y., and Kurtzman, D.: Monitoring and modeling infiltration–recharge dynamics of managed aquifer recharge with desalinated seawater, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4479–4493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4479-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-4479-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goren, O., Lazar, B., Burg, A., and Gavrieli, I.: Mobilization and
retardation of reduced manganese in sandy aquifers: Column experiments,
modeling and implications, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 96, 259–271,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.06.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.gca.2012.06.032</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Goren, O., Burg, A., Gavrieli, I., Negev, I., Guttman, J., Kraitzer, T.,
Kloppmann, W., and Lazar, B.: Biogeochemical processes in infiltration
basins and their impact on the recharging effluent, the soil aquifer
treatment (SAT) system of the Shafdan plant, Israel, Appl. Geochem., 48,
58–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.017</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gorski, G., Fisher, A. T., Beganskas, S., Weir, W. B., Redford, K., Schmidt,
C., and Saltikov, C.: Field and Laboratory Studies Linking Hydrologic,
Geochemical, and Microbiological Processes and Enhanced Denitrification
during Infiltration for Managed Recharge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
9491–9501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01191" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01191</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grau-martínez, A., Torrentó, C., Carrey, R.,
Rodríguez-escales, P., Domènech, C., Ghiglieri, G., Soler, A., and
Otero, N.: Feasibility of two low-cost organic substrates for inducing
denitrification in artificial recharge ponds: Batch and flow-through
experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 198, 48–58,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.01.001</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grau-martínez, A., Folch, A., Torrentó, C., Valhondo, C., Barba,
C., Domènech, C., Soler, A., and Otero, N.: Monitoring induced
denitrification during managed aquifer recharge in an infiltration pond, J.
Hydrol., 561, 123–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.044</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Greskowiak, J., Prommer, H., Massmann, G., and Nützmann, G.: Modeling
seasonal redox dynamics and the corresponding fate of the pharmaceutical
residue phenazone during artificial recharge of groundwater, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 6615–6621, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052506t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es052506t</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grinshpan, M., Furman, A., Dahlke, H. E., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: From
managed aquifer recharge to soil aquifer treatment on agricultural soils:
Concepts and challenges, Agr. Water Manage., 255, 106991,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106991" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106991</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grinshpan, M., Turkeltaub, T., Furman, A., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: On
the use of orchards to support soil aquifer treatment systems, Agr. Water
Manag., 260, 107315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107315" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107315</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Guswa, A. J., Celia, M. A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Models of soil
moisture dynamics in ecohydrology: A comparative study, Water Resour. Res.,
38, 5-1–5-15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001wr000826</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hargreaves, J. A.: Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture,
Aquac. Eng., 34, 344–363, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hinchey, E. K. and Schaffner, L. C.: An evaluation of electrode insertion
techniques for measurement of redox potential in estuarine sediments,
Chemosphere, 59, 703–710,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.029</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Icekson-Tal, N., Avraham, O., Sack, J., and Cikurel, H.: Water reuse in
Israel – the Dan region project: evaluation of water quality and
reliability of plant's operation, Water Supply, 3, 231–237, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Inbar, Y.: New standards for treated wastewater reuse in Israel, in:
Wastewater reuse–risk assessment, decision-making and
environmental security, edited by: Zaidi M., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Springer,
291–296, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6027-4_28" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4020-6027-4_28</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Israel Meterological Service (IMS): Web Israel Meteorological Service: Data base, <uri>https://ims.data.gov.il/ims/1</uri>, last access: 6 March 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kfir, O., Tal, A., Gross, A., and Adar, E.: The effect of reservoir
operational features on recycled wastewater quality, Resour. Conserv.
Recy., 68, 76–87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.002</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kirschbaum, M. U. F.: The temperature dependence of soil organic matter
decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 753–760,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, C., Greenwald, D., and Banin, A.: Temperature dependence of
infiltration rate during large scale water recharge into soils, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 67, 487–493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.4870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj2003.4870</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lin, C., Eshel, G., Negev, I., and Banin, A.: Long-term accumulation and
material balance of organic matter in the soil of an effluent infiltration
basin, Geoderma, 148, 35–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.017</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mächler, L., Peter, S., Brennwald, M. S., and Kipfer, R.: Excess air
formation as a mechanism for delivering oxygen to groundwater, Water Resour.
Res., 49, 6847–6856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wrcr.20547</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Massmann, G., Greskowiak, J., Dünnbier, U., Zuehlke, S., Knappe, A., and
Pekdeger, A.: The impact of variable temperatures on the redox conditions
and the behaviour of pharmaceutical residues during artificial recharge, J.
Hydrol., 328, 141–156, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.009</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMahon, P. B. and Chapelle, F. H.: Redox processes and water quality of
selected principal aquifer systems, Ground Water, 46, 259–271,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Miller, J. H., Ela, W. P., Lansey, K. E., Chipello, P. L., and Arnold, R.
G.: Nitrogen Transformations during Soil–Aquifer Treatment of Wastewater
Effluent–Oxygen Effects in Field Studies, J. Environ. Eng., 132,
1298–1306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1298)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1298)</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mizrahi, G., Furman, A., and Weisbrod, N.: Infiltration under Confined Air
Conditions: Impact of Inclined Soil Surface, Vadose Zone J., 15,
vzj2016.04.0034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2016.04.0034</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morrison, C. M., Betancourt, W. Q., Quintanar, D. R., Lopez, G. U., Pepper,
I. L., and Gerba, C. P.: Potential indicators of virus transport and removal
during soil aquifer treatment of treated wastewater effluent, Water Res.,
177, 115812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2020.115812</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nadav, I., Arye, G., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Enhanced infiltration
regime for treated-wastewater purification in soil aquifer treatment (SAT),
J. Hydrol., 420–421, 275–283,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.013</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nadav, I., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Soil cultivation for enhanced
wastewater infiltration in soil aquifer treatment (SAT), J. Hydrol.,
470–471, 75–81, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.013</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Negev, I., Shechter, T., Shtrasler, L., Rozenbach, H., and Livne, A.: The
effect of soil tillage equipment on the recharge capacity of infiltration
ponds, 12, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12020541</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nimmo, J. R., Schmidt, K. M., Perkins, K. S., and Stock, J. D.: Rapid
Measurement of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity for Areal
Characterization, Vadose Zone J., 8, 142–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/vzj2007.0159</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Oren, O., Gavrieli, I., Burg, A., Guttman, J., and Lazar, B.: Manganese
mobilization and enrichment during soil aquifer treatment (SAT) of
effluents, the Dan Region Sewage Reclamation Project (Shafdan), Israel,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 766–772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060576+" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060576+</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quanrud, D. M., Arnold, R. G., Wilson, L. G., Gordon, H. J., Graham, D. W.,
and Amy, G. L.: Fate of Organics during Column Studies of Soil Aquifer
Treatment, J. Environ. Eng., 122, 314–321,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:4(314)" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:4(314)</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Quanrud, D. M., Hafer, J., Karpiscak, M. M., Zhang, J., Lansey, K. E., and
Arnold, R. G.: Fate of organics during soil-aquifer treatment:
Sustainability of removals in the field, Water Res., 37, 3401–3411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00489-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00489-X</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reddy, K. R., D’angelo, E. M., and Harris, W. G.:  Biogeochemistry of wetlands, in:  Handbook of Soil Science, edited by: Summer, M. E., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 89–119,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203491454" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/9780203491454</ext-link>,   1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rezanezhad, F., Couture, R. M., Kovac, R., O'Connell, D., and Van Cappellen,
P.: Water table fluctuations and soil biogeochemistry: An experimental
approach using an automated soil column system, J. Hydrol., 509, 245–256,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.036</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R.: Performance evaluation of hydrological
models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in
goodness-of-fit assessments, J. Hydrol., 480, 33–45,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Escales, P., Barba, C., Sanchez-Vila, X., Jacques, D., and
Folch, A.: Coupling Flow, Heat, and Reactive Transport Modeling to Reproduce
in Situ Redox Potential Evolution: Application to an Infiltration Pond,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 12092–12101,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c03056</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sallwey, J., Jurado, A., Barquero, F., and Fahl, J.: Enhanced removal of
contaminants of emerging concern through hydraulic adjustments in soil
aquifer treatment,  Water,  12, 2627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092627" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12092627</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sattar, A. M. A.: Prediction of Organic Micropollutant Removal in Soil
Aquifer Treatment System Using GEP, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04016027,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001372</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmidt, C. M., Fisher, A. T., Racz, A. J., Lockwood, B. S., and Huertos, M.
L.: Linking denitrification and infiltration rates during managed
groundwater recharge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9634–9640,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2023626" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es2023626</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sharma, S. K. and Kennedy, M. D.: Soil aquifer treatment for wastewater
treatment and reuse, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 119, 671–677,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shenker, M., Seitelbach, S., Brand, S., Haim, A., and Litaor, M. I.: Redox
reactions and phosphorus release in re-flooded soils of an altered wetland,
Eur. J. Soil Sci., 56, 515–525,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00692.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00692.x</ext-link>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Silver, M., Knöller, K., Schlögl, J., Kübeck, C., and
Schüth, C.: Nitrogen cycling and origin of ammonium during infiltration
of treated wastewater for managed aquifer recharge, Appl. Geochem., 97,
71–80, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.08.003</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Skopp, J., Jawson, M. D., and Doran, J. W.: Steady-State Aerobic Microbial
Activity as a Function of Soil Water Content, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54,
1619–1625, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060018x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060018x</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sopilniak, A., Elkayam, R., and Lev, O.: Nitrification in a soil-aquifer
treatment system: Comparison of potential nitrification and concentration
profiles in the vadose zone, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 19, 1571–1582,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00402h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c7em00402h</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sopilniak, A., Elkayam, R., Rossin, A. V., and Lev, O.: Emerging organic
pollutants in the vadose zone of a soil aquifer treatment system: Pore water
extraction using positive displacement, Chemosphere, 190, 383–392,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.010</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W., and Morgan, J. J.: Aquatic chemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley, ISBN 978-0-471-51185-4, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tsangaratos, P., Kallioras, A., Pizpikis, T., Vasileiou, E., Ilia, I., and
Pliakas, F.: Multi-criteria Decision Support System (DSS) for optimal
locations of Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) facilities, Sci. Total Environ.,
603–604, 472–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.238" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.238</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tufenkji, N., Redman, J. A., and Elimelech, M.: Interpreting deposition
patterns of microbial particles in laboratory-scale column experiments,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 616–623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025871i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es025871i</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Turkeltaub, T.: Paper Hess-2021-455, Figshare [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wallace, C. D., Sawyer, A. H., and Barnes, R. T.: Spectral analysis of
continuous redox data reveals geochemical dynamics near the stream–aquifer
interface, Hydrol. Process., 33, 405–413,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13335" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.13335</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wallis, M. G. and Horne, D. J.: Soil water repellency, in: Advances in Soil
Science, 265–267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Continuous monitoring of a soil aquifer treatment system's physico-chemical conditions to optimize operational performance</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Amy, G. and Drewes, J.: Soil aquifer treatment (SAT) as a natural and
sustainable wastewater reclamation/reuse technology: Fate of wastewater
effluent organic Matter (EfoM) and trace organic compounds, Environ. Monit.
Assess., 129, 19–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9421-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9421-4</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arye, G., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Treated wastewater effects on water
repellency and soil hydraulic properties of soil aquifer treatment
infiltration basins, J. Hydrol., 397, 136–145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.046" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.046</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Asano, T. and Cotruvo, J. A.: Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal
wastewater: Health and regulatory considerations, Water Res., 38,
1941–1951, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.023</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., Barquero, F., Sallwey, J., Orgad, O., and Furman, A.: On the role of operational dynamics in biogeochemical efficiency of a soil aquifer treatment system, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 417–426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-417-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-417-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Ben Moshe, S., Weisbrod, N., and Furman, A.: Optimization of soil aquifer
treatment (SAT) operation using a reactive transport model, Vadose Zone J.,
20, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20095</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Ben-Noah, I., Nitsan, I., Cohen, B., Kaplan, G., and Friedman, S. P.: Soil
aeration using air injection in a citrus orchard with shallow groundwater,
Agr. Water Manage., 245, 106664,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106664" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106664</a>, 2021b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Berner, R. A.: A new geochemical classification of sedimentary environments,
J. Sediment. Perol., 51, 359–365,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7C7F-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1306/212F7C7F-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D</a>,
1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bohrerova, Z., Stralkova, R., Podesvova, J., Bohrer, G., and Pokorny, E.:
The relationship between redox potential and nitrification under different
sequences of crop rotations, Soil Till. Res., 77, 25–33,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.10.006</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bouwer, H.: Artificial recharge of groundwater: Hydrogeology and
engineering, Hydrogeol. J., 10, 121–142,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Brettar, I., Sanchez-Perez, J. M., and Trémolières, M.: Nitrate
elimination by denitrification in hardwood forest soils of the Upper Rhine
floodplain – Correlation with redox potential and organic matter,
Hydrobiologia, 469, 11–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015527611350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015527611350</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Christensen, T. H., Bjerg, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Jakobsen, R., Heron, G.,
and Albrechtsen, H. J.: Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater
contaminant plumes, J. Contam. Hydrol., 45, 165–241,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00109-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00109-1</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cook, F. J. and Knight, J. H.: Oxygen Transport to Plant Roots, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 67, 20–31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.2000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.2000</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Díaz-Cruz, M. S. and Barceló, D.: Trace organic chemicals
contamination in ground water recharge, Chemosphere, 72, 333–342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.031</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dillon, P.: Future management of aquifer recharge, Hydrogeol. J., 13,
313–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0413-6</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Doerr, S. H., Shakesby, R. A., and Walsh, R. P. D.: Soil water repellency:
Its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance, Earth
Sci. Rev., 51, 33–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Drewes, J. E.: Ground water replenishment with recycled water – Water
quality improvements during managed aquifer recharge, Ground Water, 47,
502–505, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00587_5.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00587_5.x</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Dutta, T., Carles-Brangarí, A., Fernàndez-Garcia, D., Rubol, S.,
Tirado-Conde, J., and Sanchez-Vila, X.: Vadose zone oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) dynamics
during drying and wetting cycles: An artificial recharge laboratory
experiment, J. Hydrol., 527, 151–159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.048</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Elkayam, R., Sopliniak, A., Gasser, G., Pankratov, I., and Lev, O.: Oxidizer
Demand in the Unsaturated Zone of a Surface-Spreading Soil Aquifer Treatment
System, Vadose Zone J., 14, vzj2015.03.0047,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.03.0047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.03.0047</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Essandoh, H. M. K., Tizaoui, C., and Mohamed, M. H. A.: Removal of dissolved
organic carbon and nitrogen during simulated soil aquifer treatment, Water
Res., 47, 3559–3572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, P., Aboshanp, W., and Alsamadi, B.:  Analysis of soils to demonstrate sustained organic carbon removal during soil aquifer treatment, J. Environ. Qual., 34, 156–163, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath,
G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., and Maynard, V.:
Early oxidation of organic matter in pelagic sediments of the eastern
equatorial Atlantic: suboxic diagenesis, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 43,
1075–1090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ganot, Y., Holtzman, R., Weisbrod, N., Nitzan, I., Katz, Y., and Kurtzman, D.: Monitoring and modeling infiltration–recharge dynamics of managed aquifer recharge with desalinated seawater, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4479–4493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4479-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4479-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Goren, O., Lazar, B., Burg, A., and Gavrieli, I.: Mobilization and
retardation of reduced manganese in sandy aquifers: Column experiments,
modeling and implications, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 96, 259–271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.06.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.06.032</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Goren, O., Burg, A., Gavrieli, I., Negev, I., Guttman, J., Kraitzer, T.,
Kloppmann, W., and Lazar, B.: Biogeochemical processes in infiltration
basins and their impact on the recharging effluent, the soil aquifer
treatment (SAT) system of the Shafdan plant, Israel, Appl. Geochem., 48,
58–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.06.017</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gorski, G., Fisher, A. T., Beganskas, S., Weir, W. B., Redford, K., Schmidt,
C., and Saltikov, C.: Field and Laboratory Studies Linking Hydrologic,
Geochemical, and Microbiological Processes and Enhanced Denitrification
during Infiltration for Managed Recharge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
9491–9501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01191" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01191</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Grau-martínez, A., Torrentó, C., Carrey, R.,
Rodríguez-escales, P., Domènech, C., Ghiglieri, G., Soler, A., and
Otero, N.: Feasibility of two low-cost organic substrates for inducing
denitrification in artificial recharge ponds: Batch and flow-through
experiments, J. Contam. Hydrol., 198, 48–58,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.01.001</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Grau-martínez, A., Folch, A., Torrentó, C., Valhondo, C., Barba,
C., Domènech, C., Soler, A., and Otero, N.: Monitoring induced
denitrification during managed aquifer recharge in an infiltration pond, J.
Hydrol., 561, 123–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.044</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Greskowiak, J., Prommer, H., Massmann, G., and Nützmann, G.: Modeling
seasonal redox dynamics and the corresponding fate of the pharmaceutical
residue phenazone during artificial recharge of groundwater, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40, 6615–6621, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es052506t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es052506t</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Grinshpan, M., Furman, A., Dahlke, H. E., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: From
managed aquifer recharge to soil aquifer treatment on agricultural soils:
Concepts and challenges, Agr. Water Manage., 255, 106991,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106991" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106991</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Grinshpan, M., Turkeltaub, T., Furman, A., Raveh, E., and Weisbrod, N.: On
the use of orchards to support soil aquifer treatment systems, Agr. Water
Manag., 260, 107315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107315" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107315</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Guswa, A. J., Celia, M. A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I.: Models of soil
moisture dynamics in ecohydrology: A comparative study, Water Resour. Res.,
38, 5-1–5-15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000826</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hargreaves, J. A.: Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture,
Aquac. Eng., 34, 344–363, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hinchey, E. K. and Schaffner, L. C.: An evaluation of electrode insertion
techniques for measurement of redox potential in estuarine sediments,
Chemosphere, 59, 703–710,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.029</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Icekson-Tal, N., Avraham, O., Sack, J., and Cikurel, H.: Water reuse in
Israel – the Dan region project: evaluation of water quality and
reliability of plant's operation, Water Supply, 3, 231–237, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Inbar, Y.: New standards for treated wastewater reuse in Israel, in:
Wastewater reuse–risk assessment, decision-making and
environmental security, edited by: Zaidi M., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, Springer,
291–296, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6027-4_28" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6027-4_28</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Israel Meterological Service (IMS): Web Israel Meteorological Service: Data base, <a href="https://ims.data.gov.il/ims/1" target="_blank"/>, last access: 6 March 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kfir, O., Tal, A., Gross, A., and Adar, E.: The effect of reservoir
operational features on recycled wastewater quality, Resour. Conserv.
Recy., 68, 76–87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.002</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kirschbaum, M. U. F.: The temperature dependence of soil organic matter
decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage,
Soil Biol. Biochem., 27, 753–760,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C., Greenwald, D., and Banin, A.: Temperature dependence of
infiltration rate during large scale water recharge into soils, Soil Sci.
Soc. Am. J., 67, 487–493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.4870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.4870</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, C., Eshel, G., Negev, I., and Banin, A.: Long-term accumulation and
material balance of organic matter in the soil of an effluent infiltration
basin, Geoderma, 148, 35–42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.017</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Mächler, L., Peter, S., Brennwald, M. S., and Kipfer, R.: Excess air
formation as a mechanism for delivering oxygen to groundwater, Water Resour.
Res., 49, 6847–6856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20547</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Massmann, G., Greskowiak, J., Dünnbier, U., Zuehlke, S., Knappe, A., and
Pekdeger, A.: The impact of variable temperatures on the redox conditions
and the behaviour of pharmaceutical residues during artificial recharge, J.
Hydrol., 328, 141–156, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.009</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
McMahon, P. B. and Chapelle, F. H.: Redox processes and water quality of
selected principal aquifer systems, Ground Water, 46, 259–271,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00385.x</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Miller, J. H., Ela, W. P., Lansey, K. E., Chipello, P. L., and Arnold, R.
G.: Nitrogen Transformations during Soil–Aquifer Treatment of Wastewater
Effluent–Oxygen Effects in Field Studies, J. Environ. Eng., 132,
1298–1306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1298)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1298)</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mizrahi, G., Furman, A., and Weisbrod, N.: Infiltration under Confined Air
Conditions: Impact of Inclined Soil Surface, Vadose Zone J., 15,
vzj2016.04.0034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0034</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Morrison, C. M., Betancourt, W. Q., Quintanar, D. R., Lopez, G. U., Pepper,
I. L., and Gerba, C. P.: Potential indicators of virus transport and removal
during soil aquifer treatment of treated wastewater effluent, Water Res.,
177, 115812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115812" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115812</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Nadav, I., Arye, G., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Enhanced infiltration
regime for treated-wastewater purification in soil aquifer treatment (SAT),
J. Hydrol., 420–421, 275–283,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.013</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Nadav, I., Tarchitzky, J., and Chen, Y.: Soil cultivation for enhanced
wastewater infiltration in soil aquifer treatment (SAT), J. Hydrol.,
470–471, 75–81, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.013</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Negev, I., Shechter, T., Shtrasler, L., Rozenbach, H., and Livne, A.: The
effect of soil tillage equipment on the recharge capacity of infiltration
ponds, 12, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020541</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Nimmo, J. R., Schmidt, K. M., Perkins, K. S., and Stock, J. D.: Rapid
Measurement of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity for Areal
Characterization, Vadose Zone J., 8, 142–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0159</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Oren, O., Gavrieli, I., Burg, A., Guttman, J., and Lazar, B.: Manganese
mobilization and enrichment during soil aquifer treatment (SAT) of
effluents, the Dan Region Sewage Reclamation Project (Shafdan), Israel,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 766–772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060576+" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es060576+</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Quanrud, D. M., Arnold, R. G., Wilson, L. G., Gordon, H. J., Graham, D. W.,
and Amy, G. L.: Fate of Organics during Column Studies of Soil Aquifer
Treatment, J. Environ. Eng., 122, 314–321,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:4(314)" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1996)122:4(314)</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Quanrud, D. M., Hafer, J., Karpiscak, M. M., Zhang, J., Lansey, K. E., and
Arnold, R. G.: Fate of organics during soil-aquifer treatment:
Sustainability of removals in the field, Water Res., 37, 3401–3411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00489-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00489-X</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Reddy, K. R., D’angelo, E. M., and Harris, W. G.:  Biogeochemistry of wetlands, in:  Handbook of Soil Science, edited by: Summer, M. E., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 89–119,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203491454" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203491454</a>,   1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Rezanezhad, F., Couture, R. M., Kovac, R., O'Connell, D., and Van Cappellen,
P.: Water table fluctuations and soil biogeochemistry: An experimental
approach using an automated soil column system, J. Hydrol., 509, 245–256,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.036</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Ritter, A. and Muñoz-Carpena, R.: Performance evaluation of hydrological
models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in
goodness-of-fit assessments, J. Hydrol., 480, 33–45,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.004</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez-Escales, P., Barba, C., Sanchez-Vila, X., Jacques, D., and
Folch, A.: Coupling Flow, Heat, and Reactive Transport Modeling to Reproduce
in Situ Redox Potential Evolution: Application to an Infiltration Pond,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 12092–12101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03056</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Sallwey, J., Jurado, A., Barquero, F., and Fahl, J.: Enhanced removal of
contaminants of emerging concern through hydraulic adjustments in soil
aquifer treatment,  Water,  12, 2627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092627" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092627</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Sattar, A. M. A.: Prediction of Organic Micropollutant Removal in Soil
Aquifer Treatment System Using GEP, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 04016027,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001372</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, C. M., Fisher, A. T., Racz, A. J., Lockwood, B. S., and Huertos, M.
L.: Linking denitrification and infiltration rates during managed
groundwater recharge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 9634–9640,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es2023626" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es2023626</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Sharma, S. K. and Kennedy, M. D.: Soil aquifer treatment for wastewater
treatment and reuse, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 119, 671–677,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.013</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Shenker, M., Seitelbach, S., Brand, S., Haim, A., and Litaor, M. I.: Redox
reactions and phosphorus release in re-flooded soils of an altered wetland,
Eur. J. Soil Sci., 56, 515–525,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00692.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00692.x</a>, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Silver, M., Knöller, K., Schlögl, J., Kübeck, C., and
Schüth, C.: Nitrogen cycling and origin of ammonium during infiltration
of treated wastewater for managed aquifer recharge, Appl. Geochem., 97,
71–80, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.08.003</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Skopp, J., Jawson, M. D., and Doran, J. W.: Steady-State Aerobic Microbial
Activity as a Function of Soil Water Content, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54,
1619–1625, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060018x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060018x</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sopilniak, A., Elkayam, R., and Lev, O.: Nitrification in a soil-aquifer
treatment system: Comparison of potential nitrification and concentration
profiles in the vadose zone, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 19, 1571–1582,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00402h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c7em00402h</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sopilniak, A., Elkayam, R., Rossin, A. V., and Lev, O.: Emerging organic
pollutants in the vadose zone of a soil aquifer treatment system: Pore water
extraction using positive displacement, Chemosphere, 190, 383–392,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.010</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Stumm, W., and Morgan, J. J.: Aquatic chemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley, ISBN 978-0-471-51185-4, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Tsangaratos, P., Kallioras, A., Pizpikis, T., Vasileiou, E., Ilia, I., and
Pliakas, F.: Multi-criteria Decision Support System (DSS) for optimal
locations of Soil Aquifer Treatment (SAT) facilities, Sci. Total Environ.,
603–604, 472–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.238" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.238</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Tufenkji, N., Redman, J. A., and Elimelech, M.: Interpreting deposition
patterns of microbial particles in laboratory-scale column experiments,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 616–623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es025871i" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es025871i</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Turkeltaub, T.: Paper Hess-2021-455, Figshare [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19314032</a>, 2022.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Wallace, C. D., Sawyer, A. H., and Barnes, R. T.: Spectral analysis of
continuous redox data reveals geochemical dynamics near the stream–aquifer
interface, Hydrol. Process., 33, 405–413,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13335" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13335</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Wallis, M. G. and Horne, D. J.: Soil water repellency, in: Advances in Soil
Science, 265–267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2930-8_2</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
