<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">HESS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">HESS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1607-7938</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-25-429-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Progressive water deficits during multiyear droughts <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> in basins with long hydrological memory in Chile</article-title><alt-title>Progressive water deficits during multiyear droughts</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Progressive water deficits during multiyear droughts}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Alvarez-Garreton et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Alvarez-Garreton</surname><given-names>Camila</given-names></name>
          <email>calvarezgarreton@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-4863</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Boisier</surname><given-names>Juan Pablo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Garreaud</surname><given-names>René</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Seibert</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-2124</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Vis</surname><given-names>Marc</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5589-2611</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2, FONDAP 15110009),
Santiago, Chile</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Geophysics, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Camila Alvarez-Garreton (calvarezgarreton@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>28</day><month>January</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>25</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>429</fpage><lpage>446</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>November</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Camila Alvarez-Garreton et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021.html">This article is available from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e139">A decade-long (2010–2020) period with precipitation deficits in central–south Chile (30–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), the so-called megadrought (MD), has led to streamflow depletions of larger amplitude than expected from precipitation anomalies, indicating an intensification in drought propagation. We analysed the catchment characteristics and runoff mechanisms modulating such intensification by using the CAMELS-CL dataset and simulations from the HBV hydrological model. We compared annual precipitation–runoff (P–R) relationships before and during the MD across 106 basins with varying snow-/rainfall regimes and identified those catchments where drought propagation was intensified. Our results show that catchments' hydrological memory – modulated by snow and groundwater – is a key control of drought propagation. Snow-dominated catchments (30–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) feature larger groundwater contribution to streamflow than pluvial basins, which we relate to the infiltration of snowmelt over the Western Andean Front. This leads to longer memory in these basins, represented by a significative correlation between autumn streamflow (when snow has already melted) and the precipitation from the preceding year. Hence, under persistent drought conditions, snow-dominated catchments accumulate the effects of precipitation deficits and progressively generate less water, compared with their historical behaviour, notably affecting central Chile, a region with limited water supply and which concentrates most of the country's population and water demands. Finally, we addressed a general question: what is worse – an extreme single-year drought or a persistent moderate drought? In snow-dominated basins, where water provision strongly depends on both the current and previous precipitation seasons, an extreme drought induces larger absolute streamflow deficits; however persistent deficits induce a more intensified propagation of the meteorological drought. Hence, the worst scenario would be an extreme meteorological drought following consecutive years of precipitation below average, as occurred in 2019. In pluvial basins of southern Chile
(35–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), hydrologic memory is still an important factor, but water supply is more strongly dependant on the meteorological conditions of the current year, and therefore an extreme drought would have a higher impact on water supply than a persistent but moderate drought.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e178">Persistent climatic anomalies may alter catchment response to precipitation.
Thus, catchment dynamics under unusual multiyear precipitation deficits
might not be correctly predicted based on the interannual variability over
the last decades. This applies even when past decades include severe but
shorter dry conditions (Saft et al., 2016a). In other words, stationarity as commonly assumed for streamflow projections under climate change might be an invalid assumption (Blöschl and Montanari, 2010), which poses challenges for achieving realistic structures and parameters in hydrological models
(Duethmann et al., 2020; Fowler et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e181">Non-stationary catchment response modulates hydrological functioning. This
applies particularly to drought propagation, i.e. the process leading to
soil moisture droughts and hydrological droughts (streamflow and<?pagebreak page430?> groundwater
deficits) under dry meteorological conditions (Van Loon et al., 2014). While meteorological droughts are mainly controlled by regional precipitation, soil moisture and hydrological droughts are also controlled by catchment characteristics. Therefore, under similar meteorological conditions, the severity of hydrological droughts can vary significantly within a climatic region (Van Lanen et al., 2013). Most drought-related impacts on, for instance, agriculture, ecosystems, energy, industry, drinking water, and recreation depend primarily on groundwater and streamflow deficits (Van Loon,
2015). Therefore, understanding the geographical variation in drought
propagation provides critical information for drought-hazard adaptation and
mitigation (Van Loon and Laaha, 2015). In addition to such spatial variability, non-stationary catchment responses to precipitation would lead to a temporal variation in drought propagation.</p>
      <p id="d1e184">This temporal aspect is becoming increasingly important since many regions
around the globe are experiencing unprecedented long dry spells due to climate and circulation changes, causing unforeseen impacts on water supply
(e.g. Schewe et al., 2014). Recent evidence has shown that protracted droughts may propagate differently within the same catchment (i.e. same landscape characteristics and governing runoff mechanisms) under similar precipitation deficits and temperature anomalies than shorter dry events. For example, studies in south-eastern Australia have reported changes in catchment functioning (Fowler et al., 2018; Saft et al., 2015, 2016b; Yang et al., 2017) during the Millennium drought that took place for more than a decade (1997–2010). More recently, Garreaud et al. (2017) reported an unprecedented decrease in annual runoff during a multiyear drought in central–south Chile, the so-called megadrought (MD). The amplified response of streamflow to a drought signal may be due to variations of drainage density related to depleted groundwater levels within the catchment (Eltahir and Yeh, 1999; Van De Griend et al., 2002), a factor also emphasized by Saft et al. (2016b).</p>
      <p id="d1e187">The MD experienced in Chile since 2010 (and continuing to date) offers a
great opportunity to understand the potential impacts of global changes on
hydrology and water supply over wide ranges of hydro-climatic regions and
landscape characteristics. The persistency and geographical extension of the
MD have few analogues in the last millennia, and its causes have been
partially attributed to anthropogenic climate change (Boisier et al., 2016, 2018; Garreaud et al., 2017, 2019). This uninterrupted sequence of years with precipitation deficits has impacted various sectors, including coastal ecosystems (Masotti et al., 2018), natural vegetation (Arroyo et al., 2020; Garreaud et al., 2017), fire regimes (Gonzalez et al., 2018), and water supply (Muñoz et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e191">To deepen the understanding of the impacts of persistent droughts on water
supply, we explore the mechanisms causing the larger-than-expected hydrological deficits in central–south Chile during the MD. We complement
previous analyses of the MD in Chile (Garreaud et al., 2017; Muñoz et al., 2020) by incorporating 4 more years into the MD period and by focusing on drought propagation over 106 catchments located between 30 and 41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The conceptual framework of our analysis is based on the water balance within a catchment, where the water sourced from precipitation takes different flow pathways and is temporally retained in various stores. In this scheme, the composite of response times associated with the different physical mechanisms transferring and storing water through the basin is referred to as hydrological memory (Fowler et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e203">For a dry year within a long drought, we can distinguish three cases:
(i) stationary drought propagation, when the streamflow deficits are similar to those observed in isolated years (single-year drought) with similar
precipitation deficits; (ii) intensified drought propagation, when streamflow
deficits are larger than those observed in years with similar precipitation
deficits; and (iii) attenuated drought propagation, when streamflow deficits
are lower than those observed in years with similar precipitation deficits.
Based on previous studies relating groundwater dynamics to non-stationary
catchment response to droughts (Carey et al., 2010; Eltahir and Yeh, 1999; Fowler et al., 2020; Saft et al., 2016b), we hypothesize that in catchments with longer hydrological memory (i.e. catchments where water is retained for a longer time in different storages such as aquifers and snowpack), the propagation of drought during multiyear precipitation deficits is intensified (i.e. larger streamflow deficits than those observed in years with similar precipitation deficits), when compared to single dry years.</p>
      <p id="d1e206">To test this hypothesis, we characterized the historical precipitation and
streamflow deficits at the catchment scale and followed Saft et al. (2015) to evaluate annual precipitation–runoff (P–R) relationships and identified those catchments where drought propagation during the MD was maintained, intensified, or attenuated with respect to their historical behaviour. We analysed catchment memory from observed hydrometeorological data and from the hydrological processes simulated by a bucket-type model calibrated for each basin. We related catchment hydrological memory with shifts in P–R relationships during the MD and with drought propagation for different types of drought, from extreme single-year droughts to moderate but persistent droughts (including the MD). Finally, we addressed a general question with practical implications: what is worse in terms of water supply – a single year with extreme precipitation deficits or several consecutive years with moderate deficits?</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e211">Characteristics of the study domain and location of catchments.
<bold>(a)</bold> The mean annual precipitation from CR2MET gridded dataset and the nine administrative regions covered by the study. <bold>(b)</bold> The mean annual snow fraction from the ERA5-L gridded dataset. <bold>(c)</bold> The gridded land cover dataset from Zhao et al. (2016). <bold>(d)</bold> The geological classes from Hartmann and Moosdorf (2012), corresponding to evaporites (ev), ice and glaciers (ig), metamorphics (mt), no data (nd), acid plutonic rocks (pa), basic plutonic rocks (pb), intermediate plutonic rocks (pi), pyroclastics (py), carbonate sedimentary rocks (sc), mixed sedimentary rocks (sm), siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (ss), unconsolidated sediments (su), acid volcanic rocks (va), basic volcanic rocks (vb), intermediate volcanic rocks (vi), and water bodies (wb).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Study region and data</title>
      <p id="d1e240">The study area corresponds to central–south Chile, spanning 9 out of 16 administrative regions between 30 and 41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Fig. 1). Hydrometeorological data were obtained from the CAMELS-CL dataset (Alvarez-Garreton et al.,<?pagebreak page431?> 2018), including catchment-scale daily precipitation from the CR2MET precipitation product (DGA, 2017) and streamflow time series for the period April 1979 to March 2020. Following the precipitation, snowmelt, and runoff seasonality, spanning from austral autumn to the summer of the following calendar year, the hydrological year in the study region is defined to run from April to March.</p>
      <p id="d1e252">Monthly streamflow values were computed when 15 or more days had valid data.
For those months, a mean monthly value was computed from the available daily
values and then aggregated into the total number of days within the month to
get total monthly runoff. Subsequently, gaps in monthly streamflow time
series were filled based on a procedure previously used for monthly precipitation data (Boisier et al., 2016). The method uses multivariate regression models, taking advantage of the streamflow co-variability among multiple gauging stations in the study region (within or across basins). Using this approach, data for a station can be filled if the missing data do not exceed 25 % of the period. Each missing month is independently assessed based on an ensemble of multivariate models based on covariant records from other stations as predictors. A given linear model is used if it shows a predictive power (coefficient of determination, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, larger than 0.75); otherwise, the missing month is not filled. Annual streamflow values were computed for stations and years for which all monthly values were observed or could be filled.</p>
      <p id="d1e266">We computed catchment-scale solid to total precipitation fractions and daily
estimates for snowmelt over the period April 1981 to March 2020 based on the
ECMWF surface reanalysis ERA5-Land dataset, available at a spatial resolution of 9 km (Muñoz-Sabater, 2019a).</p>
      <p id="d1e269">As a basis for the hydrological modelling (Sect. 3.1.2), we computed hypsometric curves for each catchment based on ASTER GDEM (Tachikawa et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e273">The CAMELS-CL dataset includes catchment characteristics such as topography and
geology and hydrological signatures such as the baseflow index, representing
the slow<?pagebreak page432?> catchment response to precipitation. The anthropic-related data
provided include land cover for the year 2016, the location of reservoirs, and water use rights granted within the basins.</p>
      <p id="d1e276">From the 327 catchments located between 30 and 41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Alvarez-Garreton et al., 2018), we selected 106 for this study based on the following criteria: (i) no catchments with reservoirs to exclude effects of dam operations in runoff observations (56 basins excluded); (ii) only catchments with less than 10 % of their areas covered by glaciers to exclude the effects of glacier contribution in the propagation of droughts (5 basins excluded); (iii) only catchments with more than 30 years of streamflow observations (96 basins excluded); and (iv) only catchments where the annual rainfall explained less than 50 % of the variance in annual runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in P–R regressions from Sect. 3.2.2; 64 basins excluded).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Hydrological analyses</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Hydrological regimes</title>
      <p id="d1e325">Given the latitudinal extent and terrain complexity, the study region features very different hydroclimate regimes (Fig. 1). Annual precipitation ranges from less than 100 mm to the north to near 3000 mm in the southern
part. Precipitation also increases substantially towards the west due to the
orographic effect exerted by the Andes on the predominantly westerly atmospheric flow (Viale and Garreaud, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e328">To characterize the different hydrological regimes of the study catchments,
we classified them based on the hydro-climatic metrics summarized in Table 1, which represent the main seasonal hydro-climatic characteristics of a catchment. The classification was based on a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-means clustering algorithm
(Lloyd, 1982), implemented with the H2O.ai library in Python (H2O.ai, 2020).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e341">Hydro-meteorological basin features used for classification.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ratio of mean autumn–winter precipitation (April to September) to mean annual precipitation (period April</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1979 to March 2020) from CAMELS-CL dataset</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ratio of mean autumn–winter streamflow (April to September) to mean annual streamflow (period April 1979</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">to March 2020) from CAMELS-CL dataset</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Long-term snow fraction computed as the average of ERA5-L solid to total precipitation ratio for the period</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">April 1981 to March 2020</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Modelling</title>
      <p id="d1e458">In addition to the analysis of the observations-based dataset from CAMELS-CL, we run the HBV model (Bergström, 1972; Lindström et al., 1997) to simulate streamflow and other fluxes for each of the 106 study catchments. With these simulations, we seek to improve our understanding of runoff mechanisms from a process-based perspective, particularly regarding the role of snow and groundwater in runoff generation. The HBV is a bucket-type model that simulates the main hydrological processes in a catchment through a number of routines. In the snow routine, snow accumulation and melt are simulated based on a simple degree-day approach. A variable fraction of all melted and rainfall water is retained in the soil depending on the current soil water level. The remaining part is transferred to the groundwater routine. In this routine, groundwater storage is represented by two boxes, an upper soil box representing faster groundwater release to total streamflow and a lower soil box representing a slower groundwater release to total streamflow, both with linear outflows. Finally, the simulated outflows from the groundwater stores are routed using a simple routing scheme, leading to the total streamflow. Besides streamflow, time series of a number of other fluxes and storages can be obtained from the model, such as actual evapotranspiration (ET), soil water storage, or the different streamflow components.</p>
      <p id="d1e461">The HBV model has been implemented in several software packages. Here we used the version HBV light (Seibert and Vis, 2012). The model was calibrated using a genetic algorithm (Seibert, 2000) with parameter ranges similar to those suggested earlier (e.g. Seibert and Vis, 2012). The 14 free parameters values were derived after 3500 model runs. For each catchment, 100 independent calibration trials were performed based on the non-parametric variation of Kling–Gupta efficiency, NPE (Pool et al., 2018), which resulted in ensembles with 100 parameter sets.</p>
      <p id="d1e464">To characterize the slow groundwater contribution to runoff for each basin, we computed a groundwater index (GWI) as the mean annual outflow from the
lower soil box (GW) normalized by the mean annual simulated streamflow. Note
that GWI provides a measure of the groundwater flux simulated by HBV (i.e.
not the groundwater storage). In contrast to the baseflow index provided in
CAMELS-CL, which is computed from a low-pass filter applied to streamflow
observations and thus represents the response timings to precipitation, the
GWI represents timings and also the source of the water.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Quantifying hydrological memory</title>
      <p id="d1e475">The hydrological memory of a catchment is the composite of response times
associated with the physical mechanisms transferring and storing water through the basin (Fowler et al., 2020). Such response times have been qualitatively related to the presence of aquifers, lakes, and snow (Van Loon and Van Lanen, 2012). Thus, there is no unique way to quantify hydrological memory. For example, catchment memory has been assessed based on soil moisture and groundwater dynamics (Agboma and Lye, 2015; Peters et al., 2006), on streamflow recession curves (Rodríguez-Iturbe and Valdes, 1979), on lag correlations between soil moisture and other fluxes within the catchment (Orth and Seneviratne, 2013), and on recovery times from droughts (Yang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e478">In this study, we assessed hydrological memory based on the following indices:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e483">Seasonal streamflow memory is represented by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between autumn–winter (April to September) precipitation of a certain year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the observed streamflow during the subsequent seasons: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OND</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">JFM</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMJ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These correlations represent the strength of the hydrological memory at 3, 6, and<?pagebreak page433?> 9 months, respectively.
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e587">Seasonal GW memory is represented by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the simulated GW during the subsequent seasons: GW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OND</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, GW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">JFM</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and GW<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMJ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. These correlations indicate hydrological memories of 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e676">Annual streamflow memory is represented by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the residuals of the annual P–R regressions computed in Sect. 3.2.2 (PR<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">res</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. annual streamflow not explained by the current annual precipitation) and the precipitation from the previous year (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This index represents the information gained when the precipitation from the previous year is incorporated into the annual P–R relationships, thus indicating a hydrological memory beyond 12 months.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Drought propagation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Drought characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e742">Meteorological and hydrological droughts were characterized by the observed
annual precipitation and streamflow anomalies at the catchment scale, respectively. For each basin, the relative anomaly of streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and annual precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the hydrological year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were computed as

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the annual streamflow observation and annual precipitation for the hydrological year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> are the mean annual streamflow and mean annual precipitation for the period April 1979 to March 2010 (i.e. excluding the MD), respectively. These relative anomalies are easy to interpret and commonly used in drought impact planning (Van Loon, 2015) but also have some limitations. Very large anomalies are obtained when the long-term mean is small. Furthermore, neither absolute nor relative deviations provide information about how unusual the anomalies are at specific locations. Therefore, we also computed the annual deviations of streamflow and precipitation normalized by the standard deviation of the annual time series for the period April 1979 to March 2010 (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores). Annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores for streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were computed as follows:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              To characterize the MD (April 2010 to March 2020) and to assess how unusual
this 10-year period has been in comparison to previous decades, we computed
the MD decadal means for each water flux (precipitation, observed streamflow,
and simulated ET) and compared them against historical decadal-mean values.
To account for a large sample size, we computed 100 decadal mean values from
random batches of 10 annual values within the historical records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Intensification of drought propagation during the MD</title>
      <p id="d1e1153">Stationarity in drought propagation during the MD was assessed by following
the procedure suggested by Saft et al. (2015) to identify significant shifts in annual rainfall–runoff relationships over Australian catchments during the Millennium drought. Saft et al. (2015) showed that prolonged rainfall (liquid precipitation) deficits resulted in shifts in rainfall–runoff relationships at the catchment scale, and Saft et al. (2016b) related the shifts to catchment characteristics (aridity index and rainfall seasonality) and soil and groundwater dynamics. The physical mechanisms likely associated with these factors were discussed by Saft et al. (2016b) but not explicitly modelled.</p>
      <p id="d1e1156">In this study, we computed annual P–R relationships between annual
precipitation (solid and liquid) and runoff time series for each catchment
and performed a global test to validate linear model assumptions with the
R package gvlma (Peña and Slate, 2006). From the 170 catchments fulfilling the criteria (i) to (iii) described in Sect. 2, we selected 106 for which the linear assumptions in P–R relationships were fulfilled and where the annual rainfall explained more than 50 % of the variance in annual runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> larger than 0.5).</p>
      <p id="d1e1170">For each catchment, we tested if the P–R relationship during the MD (April 2010 to March 2020) was different to the P–R relationship computed with the previous period<?pagebreak page434?> (April 1979 to March 2010), by performing the analysis of variance model from the R package aov (R Core Team, 2018) to the intercept parameter from the linear regressions (see Eq. (1) from Saft et al., 2015). From this analysis, we defined two types of cases: (i) catchments with a significant shift in P–R relationship at a 0.1 significance level and (ii) catchments that did not experience a significant shift (test <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value greater than 0.1). For those catchments experiencing a significant shift, we computed the magnitude of the shift as the relative difference between streamflow estimations from both linear regressions (prior to the MD and during the MD), given the same precipitation value. This characteristic precipitation value was defined for each basin as the average precipitation during the MD period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Propagation of extreme, severe, moderate, and mild droughts</title>
      <p id="d1e1188">In addition to computing the shifts in P–R relationships (Sect. 3.2.2), which represent an overall catchment response during the MD period, we
analysed annual drought propagation over the entire period of record (April 1979 to March 2020) based on annual precipitation and streamflow anomalies (Sect. 3.2.1). Drought propagation during a hydrological year was
represented by the contrast between streamflow and precipitation anomalies.</p>
      <p id="d1e1191">In particular, we focused on catchment responses during two types of events:
(i) single-year extreme and severe droughts and (ii) multiyear moderate and
mild droughts. For each catchment, precipitation anomalies were classified
by following the drought classification thresholds provided by McKee et al. (1995). In this way, annual anomalies between 0.5 and 0.067 quantiles were classified as mild to moderate droughts. Annual anomalies below the quantile 0.067 were classified as severe to extreme droughts. These thresholds are currently being used by the Public Works Ministry to declare water scarcity decrees (DGA resolution no. 1.674 from 2012; DGA, 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e1194">To analyse the hydrological memory effect on the propagation of extreme and
severe droughts, we separated these events based on the precipitation anomaly of the preceding year (below or above the median).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Hydrologic regime and catchment characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e1214">Based on the classification scheme described in Sect. 3.1.1, we identified
72 pluvial and 34 snow-dominated basins. Some of their main characteristics
are presented in Fig. 2. Most of the snow-dominated basins are located in
central Chile (30–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), given the higher elevation of the Andes at these latitudes (Fig. 2a). These basins feature mean annual precipitation values between 258 and 1882 mm (mean of 779 mm), with a marked concentration of precipitation during the autumn and winter months (April to September, Fig. 2b), while most of the streamflow is released during spring and summer months, when snowmelt occurs (October to January; Fig. 2b). Pluvial basins, mostly located towards the south of the study region (35–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S), have mean annual precipitation values ranging from 428 to 3376 mm (mean of 1862 mm), with a significant water accumulation (mostly rainfall) outside the autumn–winter season of maximum precipitation. Streamflow in pluvial basins follows the seasonality of precipitation closely (Fig. 2c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1237">Characteristics of pluvial and snow-dominated basins obtained from
CAMELS-CL dataset. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> presents the catchments' location.
Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> present the hydrologic regimes for snow-dominated and pluvial catchments, respectively. The mean monthly fluxes of precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and groundwater (GW) were normalized by the annual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from CAMELS-CL dataset for the period April 1979 to March 2020. Since snowmelt was obtained from a different dataset, the mean monthly snowmelt fluxes were normalized by the mean annual precipitation from ERA5-Land. Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows the relation between GWI and SF, representing groundwater and snow storages, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1280">To visualize the importance of groundwater processes within the study catchments, and their relationship with snow processes, in Fig. 2d we relate
the GWI computed from HBV simulations with the SF derived from ERA5-L for
each basin (Table 1). These variables come from independent datasets and show a significant correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which indicates the interdependence of snow and groundwater processes. The HBV model calibration resulted in overall acceptable simulation performance in snow-dominated and pluvial basins, with NPE values of 0.72, 0.88, and 0.95 for the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentile, respectively. For comparison, the corresponding Kling–Gupta efficiency values (Gupta et al., 2009) were, respectively, 0.57, 0.8, and 0.92.</p>
      <p id="d1e1299">In addition to the climatic characteristics (e.g. precipitation, snow fraction, and aridity), GW contribution to runoff depends on physical factors
(e.g. geology, topography, soil properties, and soil drainage density), which
may explain the large scatter in Fig. 2d. In fact, the geologic characteristics vary across basins, as can be seen in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. The most common geologic classes in snow-dominated basins are acid volcanic rocks (main class in 59 % of basins), followed by acid plutonic rocks (main class in 18 % of basins) and pyroclastics (main class in 18 % of basins). In pluvial basins, there is greater heterogeneity in geologic classes, with 22 % of basins dominated by pyroclastics and 19 % of basins by acid plutonic.</p>
      <p id="d1e1302">Additional characteristics of snow-dominated and pluvial catchments,
including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, SF, elevation, area, baseflow
index, main land cover class, and granted water used rights are presented in
Fig. S1. By construction, there is a clear distinction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, and SF from both clusters, which is translated into differences in mean catchment elevations (mean elevation of snow-dominated catchments is 2667 m a.s.l., while mean elevation of pluvial basins is 599 m a.s.l.). Both clusters present similar areas, and pluvial basins present lower baseflow indices compared to snow-dominated basins. Higher baseflow indices in snow-dominated basins are consistent with the larger GWI simulated in these basins (Fig. 2d).</p>
      <p id="d1e1369">Regarding the land cover, 68 % of the snow-dominated catchments are mainly
covered by barren soil and snow, while the rest is mainly covered by
shrubland. None of these land cover classes is directly associated with
anthropic activities. 94 % of the snow-dominated basins have less than 5 % of their areas covered by croplands.</p>
      <?pagebreak page435?><p id="d1e1372">The region where pluvial basins are located features a higher heterogeneity
of land cover classes, compared to the Andean region of central Chile (where
snow-dominated basins are located) (Alvarez-Garreton et al., 2018). The dominant land cover classes in pluvial basins are native forest (main class in 61 % of pluvial basins) and shrubland (main class in 11 % of pluvial basins). Anthropic-related land cover classes dominate the rest of the pluvial catchments: forest plantation in 11 % of basins, grassland in 9 % of basins, and cropland in 7 % of basins.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Hydrological memory</title>
      <p id="d1e1383">The correlation between autumn–winter precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the observed streamflow and simulated GW over the following seasons are presented in Fig. 3. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used instead of annual precipitation since it is more directly related to snow dynamics. Precipitation in autumn and winter represents between 50 % and 100 % of the total precipitation volume (Garreaud et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1420">Hydrological memory represented by different indices. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> presents the variance in seasonal streamflow explained by the variance in autumn–winter precipitation of year <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Panel <bold>(b)</bold> presents the
seasonal GW correlation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between annual precipitation and annual streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of P–R regressions) and the variance of the P–R residuals explained by the precipitation from the preceding year.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1512">Figure 3a indicates that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> explains more than half of the variance in spring and summer streamflow (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OND</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">JFM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) in snow-dominated catchments, which is consistent with the seasonal-lag hydrological memory produced by snow accumulation and melting processes. In general, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> control on streamflow in these basins is stronger during spring and decreases towards summer (larger blue bars compared to cyan bars in Fig. 3a). This memory effect drastically decreases during the subsequent autumn season (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMJ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, represented by the green bars in Fig. 3a) for most snow-dominated basins, which indicates that streamflow during autumn is more influenced by the current seasonal precipitation than by the precipitation during the preceding year. These correlations, representing memory times of 3 to 9 months (Sect. 3.1.3), are consistent with the streamflow and snowmelt seasonality presented in Fig. 2b.</p>
      <p id="d1e1581">Interestingly, the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the spring and summer GW generally increases towards the summer months (Fig. 3b). This indicates a longer response time of GW to the solid autumn–winter precipitation, compared to the streamflow time response. Consistent with this longer GW memory, the correlation to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> does not decrease so drastically after summer as streamflow does (larger green bars in Fig. 3b compared to Fig. 3a). Since snowmelt is mostly finished by January, the high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (up to 0.75 in some catchments) indicate that autumn–winter precipitation contributes to the following year's runoff after being stored as groundwater (Fig. 2b).</p>
      <p id="d1e1627">The control of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>–</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on subsequent seasonal streamflow is consistently weaker in pluvial catchments compared to snow-dominated ones, which is expected given the more direct runoff generation from rain. Also, in pluvial basins, the spring precipitation is larger than in northern basins and<?pagebreak page436?> explains most of the streamflow generated during the same season, hence overshadowing the streamflow dependency to the previous season precipitation. The spring GW memory in most pluvial catchments is stronger than the streamflow memory (larger blue bars in Fig. 3b compared to Fig. 3a), which indicates a 3-month GW memory after winter precipitation. The GW memory during spring decreases towards summer (cyan bars in Fig. 3b) and mostly disappears towards the autumn of the following year (green bars in Fig. 3b close to zero).</p>
      <p id="d1e1646">To remove the effect of the precipitation of the current year, Fig. 3c
presents the dependency of the P–R regression residuals from Sect. 3.2.2
(i.e. annual streamflow not explained by the current precipitation) to the
precipitation from the previous year. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Fig. 3c (all
corresponding to positive correlation coefficients; not shown here) represent the control that the precipitation from the previous year exerts
on the annual streamflow and thus indicate hydrological memory beyond 1
year. Interestingly, although the residual <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are larger in snow-dominated catchments, there are also significant values in the pluvial
basins, suggesting that residence times associated with GW processes in pluvial catchments also contribute to more extended catchment memory.</p>
      <p id="d1e1671">The relationship between hydrological memory beyond 1 year and catchment
storage dynamics driven by GW and snow processes is further explored in Fig. 4. The GWI derived from HBV simulations (Sect. 3.1.2) and SF (Table 1) are used to summarize GW and snow processes within a catchment in Fig. 4. These plots show that both snow and GW mechanisms contribute to the hydrological memory, which is consistent with the time lags these processes introduce to the pathways of precipitation within a basin. The adopted approach to compute the memory of a catchment, based on seasonal streamflow and GW flows at the catchment outlet, represents the composite response times of all catchment mechanisms. Therefore, there might be other factors contributing to the overall response time of a catchment, including topography, soil properties, geology, drainage area, and water table levels
(Robinson and Ward, 2017), which may explain the large scatters in Fig. 4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1676">Relationship between hydrological memory and indices of groundwater and snow storages (GWI and SF, respectively). Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the autumn streamflow correlation to the autumn–winter precipitation of the preceding year (9-month memory). Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the autumn GW correlation to the autumn–winter precipitation of the preceding year (9-month memory). Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the streamflow correlation to the precipitation of the preceding year (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-month memory).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Droughts over the last decades</title>
      <p id="d1e1712">Given the marked north to south precipitation gradient (Fig. 1), droughts
characteristics in this section are analysed at the catchment scale but
following a latitudinal order. In the following sections, we analyse drought
propagation per hydrologic regime. Heat maps in Fig. 2 illustrate<?pagebreak page437?> the
precipitation and streamflow annual anomalies (Fig. 5a and b) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores (Fig. 5c and d). The unprecedented dry conditions during the last decade are evident. The temporal and spatial extent of precipitation deficits are shown by general negative anomalies for the 106 catchments between 30 and 41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Fig. 5a). Over the previous 3 decades, there are few analogues showing such a spatial pattern, such as the 1988–1990 3-year drought and the single-year droughts in 1996 and 1998 (one of the driest years in the last millennium; Garreaud et al., 2017) and 2007. The decade-long persistence of the MD spatial pattern, however, has no analogue in the studied period, nor in the last century (Garreaud et al., 2017).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1733">Relative annual anomalies of catchment-scale precipitation <bold>(a)</bold> and streamflow <bold>(b)</bold>. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> present the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> score of annual precipitation and streamflow. The MD period (April 2010 to March 2020) is highlighted by a grey box. Each row in the heat maps corresponds to one study catchment, and the catchments are sorted from north to south to illustrate regional drought patterns.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1761">The relative precipitation anomalies are consistently higher in catchments
north of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Fig. 5a), which is partly due to the very low annual precipitation values in the northern region compared to the southern region. The probability of having high anomalies is larger in this northern region (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores closer to zero in Fig. 5c), where few meteorological events contribute to most of the annual accumulation. Thus, the interannual variability is higher than in the southern region (south of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, where most pluvial basins are located, Fig. 2), where several precipitation events occur during the year. During the MD, annual precipitation in basins south of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S decreased up to 1.5 times below the historical standard deviation of annual precipitation, which represents an exceedance probability of 94.3%. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores during the MD have usually been lower in the southern region compared to central Chile (30–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S).</p>
      <p id="d1e1816">The annual streamflow relative anomalies (Fig. 5b) present larger values and
larger variations in space and time than precipitation, which is due to the
lower absolute values compared to precipitation and the dependency of
streamflow on local terrestrial characteristics. If we compare the spatial
patterns of anomalies (Fig. 5b) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores (Fig. 5d) during the MD, we see that consistently with precipitation, larger anomalies have been observed in catchments north of 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (extreme dry years up to 90 % of
streamflow deficits with a median of 57 %). Still, the moderate deficits
experienced in the southern region (median deficit of 25 %) have a lower
probability of occurring (lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> score values, indicating higher exceedance probabilities).</p>
      <p id="d1e1842">To further characterize the hydro-climatic anomalies during the MD, Fig. 6
presents the frequency distribution of 10-year mean precipitation, observed
streamflow, and simulated ET for each basin, with the mean values during the
MD plotted by red dots. These plots indicate that the MD has been extremely
unusual in terms of precipitation and streamflow. The average precipitation
during the MD is within the first decile for 91 % of the study catchments
(96 out of 106). The average runoff during the MD has been more extreme than
precipitation deficits, with 96 % of catchments (102 out of 106) presenting 10-year mean runoff values within the first decile. These values represent the minimum value over the last 4 decades for some basins located north to 32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and correspond to an outlier of the historical distribution for the rest of the catchments. The average 10-year ET during the MD has been less unusual than precipitation and streamflow anomalies, with only 20 % of catchments (21 out of 106) within the first decile and 73 % of basins below the median (quantile 0.5) historical 10-year ET values. This indicates that in general, the estimated ET within the study basins during the MD has not been as different from normal conditions as precipitation and streamflow. This also shows that, despite the higher mean temperatures due to the warming trend experienced in the region (Boisier et al., 2018), ET is closely related to precipitation, notably in the northern (water-limited) basins.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1856">Box plots of 10-year mean precipitation <bold>(a)</bold>, observed runoff <bold>(b)</bold>, and simulated ET from HBV <bold>(c)</bold> for the period April 1970 to March 2010 (i.e. excluding the MD). The red marks correspond to the decadal means during the MD (April 2010 to March 2020). Please note the log scale of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes in <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Shifts in P–R relationships during the MD</title>
      <p id="d1e1896">Given the relatively small scale of catchments in Chile, runoff in most of
them has a strong dependency on the interannual precipitation variability,
explaining typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %<?pagebreak page438?> of the streamflow variances. Yet, the annual P–R relationships observed during the MD changed significantly for some of the catchments within the study region (examples in Fig. 7b, c, e, and f), while other catchments showed no significant change (Fig. 7a and d). Table 2 summarizes the number of catchments that experienced a significant shift in P–R relationship during the MD and their associated shift magnitudes. This table also shows the results for those catchments with no change. From the 106 studied catchments, 61.3 % had a significant change in the P–R relationship during the MD, and 38.7 % had not changed (Table 2).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1911">Annual runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes) and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axes) for selected
snow-dominated catchments with and without a significant change in P–R relationships during the MD <bold>(a–c)</bold>. Panels <bold>(d–f)</bold> show three selected pluvial basins with and without change. The years within the MD are
highlighted in magenta when there was change and grey when there was no change in P–R regressions. The map shows the catchments with change coloured
by their shift in P–R relationships.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Table}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1943">Number of catchments with a significant shift and no shift in P–R relationships during the MD. The shift magnitude in catchments with change is given in italics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Snow-dominated</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pluvial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">65</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean shift (min, max)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><italic>–31 %</italic> (<italic>–57 %</italic>, <italic>–12 %</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>–11 %</italic> (<italic>–37 %</italic>, <italic>27 %</italic>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><italic>–19 %</italic> (<italic>–57 %</italic>, <italic>27 %</italic>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No change</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2065">For the 65 catchments showing a change, the historical P–R regressions
consistently underestimate the runoff deficits during the MD. 95 % (62 out
of 65) of the catchments with a significant change in P–R relationship during the MD, had a negative shift, that is, an intensification in drought
propagation. For similar precipitation deficits to other dry years, observed
streamflow during the MD in snow-dominated catchments was up to 57 % lower than predicted by the historical P–R relationship. In pluvial catchments, these shifts reached up to 37 % (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d1e2068">For those catchments with a significant change, higher GWI values are associated with larger shifts in P–R relationships (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, not shown here) and thus with the intensification of drought propagation during the MD, with respect to historical annual responses to droughts. The relationship between snow fraction and P–R shifts is weaker (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, not shown here), probably because snow processes control the hydrologic response of a subset of catchments experiencing a significant change in P–R relationships, whereas GW is inherent to all basins.</p>
      <p id="d1e2101">While these results provide insights about changes in P–R relationships during a multiyear period, they do not indicate if the changes are progressive, i.e. if the basins progressively generate less water for a
given precipitation amount, compared with their historical behaviour. We address this in the following section, where annual drought propagation is
analysed in detail.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page439?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Annual drought propagation</title>
      <p id="d1e2114">Figure 8 presents the time series of annual precipitation and streamflow
anomalies averaged across snow-dominated catchments (Fig. 8a) and pluvial
catchments (Fig. 8b) over the last 4 decades. Drought propagation is
represented by the difference between average runoff and precipitation anomalies (secondary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in Fig. 8). To focus on drought propagation and
not on the propagation of positive anomalies, the difference in runoff to
precipitation anomalies was computed only for those years with negative
streamflow anomalies (red line in Fig. 8).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2126">Precipitation and runoff anomalies in snow-dominated <bold>(a)</bold> and pluvial catchments <bold>(b)</bold>. The blue shaded area between curves represents precipitation anomalies larger than streamflow anomalies, and the green shaded area represents the opposite. The meteorological to hydrological drought propagation, represented by the difference between runoff and precipitation anomalies for those years where runoff anomaly is below zero, is shown on the secondary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis by red points connected with red lines between consecutive years.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2148">In snow-dominated basins, the difference between runoff and precipitation
anomalies consistently increases (becomes more negative) in the second year
of precipitation deficits, showing that in catchments with longer hydrological memory, consecutive years with precipitation deficits are associated with intensified drought propagation. This plot also provides
insights about hydrological recovery, understood as the hydrological condition after a meteorological drought has ceased (Yang et al., 2017). While 2016 had near-average<?pagebreak page440?> precipitation in snow-dominated basins, there was probably not enough water entering the system over enough time to recharge groundwater systems up to levels such as those before the MD (similarly to the conceptual drought propagation illustrated in Fig. 3 from Van Loon, 2015). This is reflected by the larger streamflow deficits in 2016 compared to 2008, even when the above-mean precipitation values in 2008 following the deficits in 2007 are comparable to those in 2016 and 2015, respectively. This can be related to the catchments' memory (Sect. 4.2) and the 7-year (2009 to 2015) precipitation deficits prior to 2016, which probably prevented a full hydrological recovery after a single year of above-average precipitation. These results are consistent with large recovery times
reported for semi-arid Australian catchments following extreme droughts
(Fowler et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2017). In this way, hydrological memory would be an explanatory factor for both the intensification in drought propagation and a delayed hydrological recovery.</p>
      <p id="d1e2152">For pluvial catchments (Fig. 8b), prior to 2010, the propagation of
meteorological to hydrological drought has ranged from around 0 % to 15 % (i.e. streamflow anomalies have been, on average, up to 15 % lower than
precipitation anomalies), independently of the precipitation deficits of
previous years. Such propagation was observed even in the driest 2 years
of the historical record, 1996 and 1998. After 2010, there are 2 years (2012 and 2016) where drought propagation has been intensified up to 25 %.
These larger streamflow deficits during the MD may be due to different factors, including the large ET in 2012 and 2016 (positive anomalies and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> scores above 1.5, as can be seen in Fig. S2) combined with large precipitation deficits.</p>
      <p id="d1e2162">Regarding the overall response during the MD, since P–R relationships do not
explicitly account for variations in ET, the positive ET anomalies during
specific years of the MD (2012, 2016 and 2018, Fig. S2) may partly explain the P–R shifts identified in some pluvial catchments (Fig. 7). Towards the
south of the study region, basins move from<?pagebreak page441?> being water-limited to energy-limited
(Alvarez-Garreton et al., 2018). Therefore, ET in pluvial catchments is modulated by both the available water and the available energy, in contrast to snow-dominated catchments, where ET is primarily driven by precipitation (these are water-limited basins). This suggests that ET may be a factor influencing the intensification of drought propagation during the MD in pluvial catchments. However, despite higher ET in 3 years during the MD, the average ET during the 10-year MD period has been lower than other 10-year windows (Fig. 6c). Therefore, the hydrological memory beyond 1 hydrological year in pluvial basins (Fig. 3) is likely another factor contributing to the P–R shifts in pluvial catchments.</p>
      <p id="d1e2165">Figure 9 presents the observed and simulated drought propagation during
single-year severe and extreme droughts and during persistent mild and moderate droughts, for snow-dominated (Fig. 9a and b) and pluvial catchments
(Fig. 9c and d). Consistent with the hydrological memory in snow-dominated
catchments, we observe that drought propagation in these basins is highly
dependent on the meteorological conditions from the previous year (Fig. 9a),
which define the initial condition of soil water storages. If a severe or
extreme drought happens after a wet year, such as 1981, 1985, 1988, 1998, 2007, and 2009 (Fig. 9a), drought propagates without amplification; i.e.
streamflow deficits are lower than precipitation deficits. By contrast, if
the extreme drought happens after a dry year, such as 1995, 1996, 2013, and 2019, meteorological droughts are amplified by nearly 20 % (difference
between median streamflow and median precipitation deficits in Fig. 9a). This is also observed in persistent but moderate droughts, when under similar precipitation deficits, the surface water supply decreases after 1 year with below-average conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2170">Observed and simulated annual drought propagation for consecutive
dry years. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> presents the results for snow-dominated catchments and <bold>(b)</bold> for pluvial catchments. The number of cases is presented for each set of box plots.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/25/429/2021/hess-25-429-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2185">If we look at streamflow predictions, these plots indicate that the HBV model represents catchment response for extreme and persistent droughts well, consistently outperforming the prediction from P–R regressions. It should be noted though that HBV allows for memory effects only to a certain extent given the groundwater storage capacity defined by calibration.</p>
      <p id="d1e2189">Pluvial basins in the study region have shorter hydrological memory compared
to snow-dominated catchments, which leads to a more similar behaviour under
extreme meteorological droughts occurring after a wet and a dry year (difference in streamflow to precipitation anomalies between 10 %–20 %; Fig. 9c). However, even when these basins are largely controlled by precipitation during the same year, there is some memory that is over 1 year (Fig. 3c), which may be influencing the observed decrease in streamflow generation after 2 years of consecutive precipitation deficits (Fig. 9d). This effect is well captured by the HBV model, while the annual P–R relationship tends to overestimate<?pagebreak page442?> observed runoff. This indicates that a good representation of fluxes such as ET, soil moisture, and groundwater dynamics, allows catchment response to persistent droughts and to extreme droughts to be foreseen.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2202">Hydrological memory is related to slow groundwater and subsurface flows
transferring precipitation from previous seasons, especially from winter
(Figs. 3 and 4). If the winter snowpack is large, hydrological memory is further extended, not only by the season lag resulting from the snowmelt contribution to streamflow in spring and summer, but also by the slow GW contribution during the next autumn, when the snow has already melted.</p>
      <p id="d1e2205">We showed that the importance of GW contribution to runoff is positively
correlated with snow accumulation (Fig. 2d). This relationship between snow
and groundwater contribution to downstream streamflow supports the GW
recharge conceptualization recently proposed by Taucare et al. (2020) for the Western Andean Front in central Chile. In contrast to former assumptions of no GW recharge in high elevated Andean areas, Taucare et al. (2020) demonstrated the existence of GW circulation in fractured rocks originating from rain and snowmelt above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.s.l. (the mean elevation of the
snow-dominated basins in this study range from 737 to 3783, with a mean of
2667 m a.s.l.).</p>
      <p id="d1e2218">This conceptualization is also supported by the groundwater recharge mechanisms driven by snowmelt shown by Carroll et al. (2019) in a Colorado River headwater basin. Snowmelt infiltrates in situ, where ET is low compared to precipitation, the soil storage is shallow, and there is a low permeability bedrock underneath. Infiltrated snowmelt is routed through the steep topography as shallow ephemeral interflow, which supports large recharge rates in topographic convergence zones, where ET is still moderate and ephemeral stream channels in the upper basin appear (Anderson and Burt, 1978). At high elevations where snowmelt starts, topography and soil permeability would have a larger control in groundwater recharge than precipitation. That is, the rates at which snowmelt infiltrates are more sensitive to catchment characteristics than to the snowpack volume (Carroll et al., 2019). This suggests that during dry years, the portion of snowmelt directly contributing to runoff would decrease, while the portion of GW from snowmelt infiltration would increase.</p>
      <p id="d1e2221">The large snowmelt infiltration rates at high elevations during snowmelt season, combined with the absence of precipitation events (precipitation is
concentrated in the winter season), would explain the higher GWI in snow-dominated basins.</p>
      <p id="d1e2225">High snow fraction ratios also indicate an important spatial variation of
precipitation within the basin, with most precipitation falling in the upper
part of the basin and, therefore, travelling longer paths to reach the outlet
where streamflow is recorded. Longer paths lead to longer travel times (i.e. longer hydrological memory), which may support groundwater recharge from interflow.</p>
      <p id="d1e2228">Regarding drought propagation, our results show that precipitation has an influence
for longer times in basins where snow and GW processes dominate the hydrological response. Snow-dominated catchments feature longer memory than
pluvial basins and have been more affected by the<?pagebreak page443?> persistency of precipitation deficits during the MD, causing a significant change in overall catchment response to the precipitation over the last decade. These results complement previous findings in Australia (Saft et al., 2015, 2016a, b), providing new evidence of the vulnerability of catchments to drying climatic trends. In particular, our results reveal that snow processes are tightly associated with the intensification in drought propagation, a conclusion that was not drawn by the analysis of the Australian Millennium drought given the lower elevation of the Australian basins analysed (mean elevations below 1500 m a.s.l.).</p>
      <p id="d1e2231">The role of snow in hydrological memory and its impacts on water provision
during droughts highlight the need to further understand the seasonal
characteristics of drought propagation. The effects of spring–summer
precipitation deficits may be different from those of autumn–winter
deficits (Berghuijs et al., 2014; Jasechko et al., 2014). This is particularly important in central–south Chile, where shifts in precipitation and streamflow seasonality due to anthropogenic climate change have already been detected in observations (Boisier et al., 2018; Bozkurt et al., 2018; Cortés et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e2234">Our results also provide insights regarding model representation of hydrologic mechanisms. The HBV model overcomes some of the limitations of
diagnosing the progressive water deficits only from shifts in annual P–R relationships. A model that can capture catchment memory is more suited to represent deficits in streamflow under persistent drought, compared to the
simulations from P–R regressions that only consider the precipitation of the
same year (Fowler et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the HBV model is a simplified representation of actual hydrological processes, which limits its capability to simulate long-term memory effects. Memory effects in the HBV model are caused by soil water storage as this store can accumulate precipitation deficits. The groundwater stores in HBV cannot drain below the level where streamflow ceases and, thus, represent only the dynamic storage in a catchment (Staudinger et al., 2017), which means that memory effects caused by groundwater stores are limited in the model. This is consistent with the limitations of conceptual bucket-type models to simulate long, slow hydrological processes demonstrated by Fowler et al. (2020). The effects of
multiyear drought cannot accumulate in models where the time constants (usually months) are shorter than the observed memory (seasonal and longer).
In this way, catchments that are more prone to a non-stationary hydrologic
response under persistent droughts pose greater challenges for projecting the impacts of a drying climate. This highlights the need to advance towards
robust modelling frameworks in order to achieve reliable streamflow predictions under drier climate projections.</p>
      <p id="d1e2237">The proposed approach focuses on understanding the causes of intensified
drought propagation by analysing the basins' runoff mechanisms and the
hydrological memory within the basins. However, anthropic factors such as
irrigated agriculture, reservoirs, and water abstractions for human consumption may also contribute to different catchment responses to
precipitation during persistent droughts. While the water used by natural
ecosystems is related to the incoming precipitation (e.g. in water-limited
basins, ET is proportional to the precipitation), the water used to supply
human demands may remain similar to pre-drought conditions if the associated
infrastructure allows for it (e.g. deep pumping wells or large reservoirs). This may cause a decrease in runoff, which is not directly related to precipitation deficits. In this study, we aimed at removing some of these anthropic effects by filtering out catchments with reservoirs, but there are still anthropic activities within the analysed sample. In particular, pluvial basins feature human-induced land cover classes such as cropland, forest plantations, and grassland (Sect. 4.1). Previous findings have related these classes to differences in water provision, particularly during dry years (Alvarez-Garreton et al., 2019). Hence, drought propagation within these basins is likely a combined result of climatic conditions, hydrological mechanisms, and anthropic effects. In contrast, the sample of snow-dominated catchments is less prone to anthropic effects given their location in high elevated areas of the Andes cordillera (no human-related dominant land cover classes within the basins; Sect. 4.1). This suggests that the intensification of drought propagation in these basins is mainly due to climatic conditions and hydrological mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2248">Our analysis of 106 basins along central Chile indicates that larger solid
precipitation fraction within a catchment leads to increased slow GW contribution to runoff, thus connecting precipitation anomalies in a given
winter with streamflow until autumn of the next year. In this way, snow-dominated catchments have a memory that strongly connects streamflow
generation over consecutive hydrological years. In pluvial basins on the other hand, hydrological memory is shorter, and the annual streamflow is mostly explained by the precipitation of the current year.</p>
      <p id="d1e2251">These different hydrological memories have led to contrasted drought propagation during the MD. The MD in central–south Chile has been extraordinary because of its persistence (10 years to date) and extended
spatial domain (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km). Annual precipitation anomalies during the MD have been larger in snow-dominated catchments (mostly located between 30–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) compared to pluvial catchments (mostly located between 35–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S). However, observing such large annual deficits in the northern region is not unusual given the highly variable rainfall regime. The annual precipitation anomalies experienced in the southern region, on the other hand, have been highly unusual with respect to the last 4 decades.</p>
      <?pagebreak page444?><p id="d1e2282"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Catchments with longer hydrological memory showed larger shifts in P–R relationships during the MD, compared to their historical behaviour,
revealing the intensification of drought propagation during multiyear droughts. For snow-dominated catchments, after 1 year of precipitation
deficits, the surface water supply – under equivalent precipitation
deficits – significantly decreases. That is, the basins progressively generate less streamflow for a given precipitation amount compared with the
historical behaviour because snowmelt infiltrates into depleted levels of GW and does not reach the catchment outlets during the same hydrological year. In pluvial basins, on the other hand, there is a weaker decrease in the water supply after consecutive years of precipitation deficits.</p>
      <p id="d1e2286">What is worse – an extreme single-year drought or a persistent moderate drought? We have shown that for any type of drought, hydrological memory and
initial storage conditions are key factors modulating catchment responses.
In snow-dominated basins located in the Andean semi-arid region of Chile,
catchments strongly depend on both the current and previous precipitation
seasons. In absolute terms, single-year extreme droughts induce larger absolute streamflow deficits (i.e. less water supply). However, moderate
but persistent deficits induce a more intensified propagation of the
meteorological drought (larger streamflow deficits relative to precipitation). The worst scenario would be an extreme meteorological drought following consecutive years of below-average precipitation, as occurred in 2019. In pluvial regimes, initial conditions and hydrologic memory are still important factors to represent catchment response fully. However, water supply is more strongly dependent on the meteorological conditions of the current year. Therefore, an extreme drought would have a higher impact on water supply than a persistent but moderate drought.</p>
      <p id="d1e2290">Snow-dominated catchments store water that is then released during dry seasons, a characteristic particularly valuable in regions with a limited
water supply and a severe risk to droughts, such as in central Chile. We have demonstrated that these basins are prone to intensify the propagation of persistent droughts, which pose additional challenges to water management adaptation in central Chile given the drying projected trends for the region.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2297">The CAMELS-CL catchment dataset was obtained from the Center for Climate and Resilience Research website at <uri>http://www.cr2.cl/camels-cl/</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020) (Alvarez-Garreton, 2018). The ECMWF ERA5-Land dataset was downloaded from <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/en/era5-land</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020) (Muñoz Sabater, 2019b). ASTER GDEM elevation data were downloaded from the NASA Earthdata website at
<uri>https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020) ASTER GDEM, 2020).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e2309">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-429-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-429-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2318">This research was conceived and design by CAG, JPB, and RG. JS and MV implemented the HBV model. CAG wrote the paper with input from all co-authors. All the authors have been involved in interpreting the results, discussing the findings, and editing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2324">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2330">This research has been developed within the framework of the Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2, ANID/FONDAP/15110009) and the joint research project ANID/NSFC190018. Camila Alvarez-Garreton also acknowledges support by ANID/FONDECYT/1201714. We thank the editor Markus Hrachowitz and the referees Anne Van Loon and Gemma Coxon for their constructive comments that greatly improved the original manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e2335">This research has been developed within the framework of the Center for Climate and Resilience Research (grant no. ANID/FONDAP/15110009) and the joint research project ANID/NSFC190018. Camila Alvarez-Garreton also acknowledges support by ANID/FONDECYT/1201714.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2341">This paper was edited by Markus Hrachowitz and reviewed by Anne Van Loon and Gemma Coxon.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Agboma, C. O. and Lye, L. M.: Hydrologic memory patterns assessment over a
drought-prone Canadian prairies catchment, J. Hydrol. Eng., 20, 1–11,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001106</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alvarez-Garreton, C.: CAMELS-CL explorer, available at: <uri>http://camels.cr2.cl/</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alvarez-Garreton, C., Mendoza, P. A., Boisier, J. P., Addor, N., Galleguillos, M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Lara, A., Puelma, C., Cortes, G., Garreaud, R., McPhee, J., and Ayala, A.: The CAMELS-CL dataset: catchment attributes and meteorology for large sample studies – Chile dataset, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5817–5846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alvarez-Garreton, C., Lara, A., Boisier, J. P., and Galleguillos, M.: The
Impacts of Native Forests and Forest Plantations on Water Supply in Chile,
Forests, 10, 473, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060473" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/f10060473</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P.: Role of Topography in Controlling Throughflow Generation, Earth Surf. Process., 3, 331–344,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290030402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.3290030402</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page445?><ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arroyo, M. T. K., Robles, V., Tamburrino, Í., Martínez-Harms, J.,
Garreaud, R. D., Jara-Arancio, P., Pliscoff, P., Copier, A., Arenas, J.,
Keymer, J., and Castro, K.: Extreme Drought A ff ects Visitation and Seed Set
in a Plant Species in the Central Chilean Andes Heavily Dependent on Hummingbird Pollination, Plants, 9, 1–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111553" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/plants9111553</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ASTER GDEM: Earthdata Search, available at: <uri>https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov</uri>, last access: 31 May 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., and Hrachowitz, M.: A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow, Nat. Clim. Change,
4, 583–586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate2246</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bergström, S.: Utvechling och tillämpning av en digital avrinningsmodell, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Blöschl, G. and Montanari, A.: Climate change impacts – throwing the
dice?, Hydrol. Process., 24, 374–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7574" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7574</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Garreaud, R., and Muñoz, F.: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to the Southeast Pacific precipitation decline and recent megadrought in central Chile, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 413–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067265" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL067265</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garretón, C., Cordero, R. R., Damiani, A., Gallardo, L., Garreaud, R. D., Lambert, F., Ramallo, C., Rojas, M., and
Rondanelli, R.: Anthropogenic drying in central-southern Chile evidenced by
long-term observations and climate model simulations, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6,
74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.328</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bozkurt, D., Rojas, M., Boisier, J. P., and Valdivieso, J.: Projected
hydroclimate changes over Andean basins in central Chile from downscaled CMIP5 models under the low and high emission scenarios, Climatic Change, 150, 131–147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2246-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10584-018-2246-7</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carey, S. K., Tetzlaff, D., Seibert, J., Soulsby, C., Buttle, J., Laudon, H., McDonnell, J., McGuire, K., Caissie, D., Shanley, J., Kennedy, M., Devito, K., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Inter-comparison of hydro-climatic regimes across northern catchments: Synchronicity, resistance and resilience, Hydrol. Process., 24, 3591–3602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.7880</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carroll, R. W. H., Deems, J. S., Niswonger, R., Schumer, R., and Williams, K.
H.: The Importance of Interflow to Groundwater Recharge in a Snowmelt-Dominated Headwater Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5899–5908,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082447</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cortés, G., Vargas, X., and McPhee, J.: Climatic sensitivity of streamflow timing in the extratropical western Andes Cordillera, J. Hydrol.,
405, 93–109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.013</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
DGA: Resolución 1674, Deja sin efecto Resolución D. G. A. No. 39, de febrero de 1984 y establece nuevos criterios para calificar épocas de extraordinaria sequía, 12 de Junio de 2012, Dirección General de Aguas, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Chile, p. 3, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
DGA: Actualización del Balance Hídrico Nacional, SIT No. 417, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Dirección General de Aguas, División de Estudios y Planificación, Realizado por: Universidad de Chile &amp; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duethmann, D., Blöschl, G., and Parajka, J.: Why does a conceptual hydrological model fail to correctly predict discharge changes in response to climate change?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3493–3511, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eltahir, E. A. B. and Yeh, P. J. F.: On the asymmetric response of aquifer
water level to floods and droughts in Illinois, Water Resour. Res., 35,
1199–1217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998WR900071</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fowler, K., Peel, M., Western, A., and Zhang, L.: Improved Rainfall-Runoff
Calibration for Drying Climate: Choice of Objective Function, Water Resour.
Res., 54, 3392–3408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017WR022466</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fowler, K., Knoben, W., Peel, M., Peterson, T., Ryu, D., Saft, M., Seo, K. W., and Western, A.: Many Commonly Used Rainfall-Runoff Models Lack Long, Slow Dynamics: Implications for Runoff Projections, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025286" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019WR025286</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fowler, K. J. A., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., Zhang, L., and Peterson, T. J.: Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an
apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 52, 1820–1846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018068" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015WR018068</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garreaud, R., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Barichivich, J., Boisier, J. P., Christie, D., Galleguillos, M., LeQuesne, C., McPhee, J., and Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.: The 2010–2015 mega drought in Central Chile: Impacts
on regional hydroclimate and vegetation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21,
6307–6327, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Garreaud, R. D., Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H. H., and Veloso-Aguila, D.: The Central Chile Mega Drought (2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 421–439, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.6219</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gonzalez, M. E., Gómez-González, S., Lara, A., Garreaud, R., and
Díaz-Hormazábal, I.: The 2010–2015 Megadrought and its influence on the fire regime in central and south-central Chile, Ecosphere, 9, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ecs2.2300</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N.: The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the Earth surface, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, 1–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GC004370</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>H2O.ai: h2o: Python Interface for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Python package version 3.30.0.6, available at: <uri>https://github.com/h2oai/h2o-3</uri>, last access: 31 May 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jasechko, S., Birks, S. J., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Fawcett, P. J., Sharp, Z. D., McDonnell, J. J., and Welker, J. M.: The pronounced seasonality of global groundwater recharge, Water Resour. Res., 50, 8845–8867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014WR015809</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and Bergström, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272–288, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lloyd, S. P.: Least Squares Quantization in PCM, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 28, 129–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page446?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Masotti, I., Aparicio-Rizzo, P., Yevenes, M. A., Garreaud, R., Belmar, L., and Farías, L.: The Influence of River Discharge on Nutrient Export and
Phytoplankton Biomass Off the Central Chile Coast (33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S): Seasonal Cycle and Interannual Variability, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2018.00423</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: Drought monitoring with multiple time scales, in: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Applied
Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 233–236, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muñoz, A. A., Klock-Barría, K.; Alvarez-Garreton, C., Aguilera-Betti, I., González-Reyes, Á., Lastra, J. A., Chávez, R. O., Barría, P., Christie, D., Rojas-Badilla, M., and LeQuesne, C.: Water Crisis in Petorca Basin, Chile: The Combined Effects of a Mega-Drought and Water Management, Water, 12, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030648" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/w12030648</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Muñoz-Sabater, J.: First ERA5-Land dataset to be released this spring,
ECMWF Newsl., 159, 8–9, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muñoz Sabater, J.: ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), available at: <uri>https://www.ecmwf.int/en/era5-land</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2019b</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Orth, R. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Propagation of soil moisture memory to
streamflow and evapotranspiration in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3895–3911, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3895-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-3895-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peña, E. A. and Slate, E. H.: Global validation of linear model assumptions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 101, 341–354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1198/016214505000000637</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peters, E., Bier, G., van Lanen, H. A. J., and Torfs, P. J. J. F.: Propagation and spatial distribution of drought in a groundwater catchment, J. Hydrol., 321, 257–275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.004</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pool, S., Vis, M., and Seibert, J.: Evaluating model performance: towards a
non-parametric variant of the Kling–Gupta efficiency, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 1941–1953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: <uri>https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Robinson, M. and Ward, R.: Hydrology: principles and processes, 2017th Edn.,
IWA, London, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdes, J. B.: The geomorphologic structure of
hydrologic response, Water Resour. Res., 15, 1409–1420, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saft, M., Western, A. W., Zhang, L., Peel, M. C., and Potter, N. J.: The
influence of multiyear drought on the annual rainfall-runoff relationship: An Australian perspective, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2444–2463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015348" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014WR015348</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saft, M., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., Perraud, J. M., and Zhang, L.: Bias in
streamflow projections due to climate-induced shifts in catchment response,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1574–1581, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067326" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL067326</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saft, M., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., and Zhang, L.: Predicting shifts in
rainfall-runoff partitioning during multiyear drought: Roles of dry period and catchment characteristics, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9290–9305,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019525" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016WR019525</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., and Clark, D. B.: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3245–3250, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1222460110</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-4-215-2000</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seibert, J. and Vis, M. J. P.: Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3315–3325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Staudinger, M., Stoelzle, M., Seeger, S., Seibert, J., Weiler, M., and Stahl,
K.: Catchment water storage variation with elevation, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2000–2015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/hyp.11158</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M., and Iwasaki, A.: Characteristics of ASTER
GDEM version 2, in: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3657–3660, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Taucare, M., Daniele, L., Viguier, B., Vallejos, A., and Arancibia, G.:
Groundwater resources and recharge processes in the Western Andean Front of
Central Chile, Sci. Total Environ., 722, 137824, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137824</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van De Griend, A. A., De Vries, J. J., and Seyhan, E.: Groundwater discharge
from areas with a variable specific drainage resistance, J. Hydrol., 259, 203–220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00583-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00583-2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Lanen, H. A. J., Wanders, N., Tallaksen, L. M., and Van Loon, A. F.:
Hydrological drought across the world: Impact of climate and physical catchment structure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1715–1732,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought explained, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev.
Water, 2, 359–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wat2.1085</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Loon, A. F. and Laaha, G.: Hydrological drought severity explained by
climate and catchment characteristics, J. Hydrol., 526, 3–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.059</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Loon, A. F. and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: A process-based typology of hydrological drought, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1915–1946,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1915-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/hess-16-1915-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Loon, A. F., Tijdeman, E., Wanders, N., Van Lanen, H. A. J., Teuling, A.
J., and Uijlenhoet, R.: How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and
deficit, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4640–4656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd020383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013jd020383</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Viale, M. and Garreaud, R.: Summer Precipitation Events over the Western Slope of the Subtropical Andes, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1074–1092,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00259.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/MWR-D-13-00259.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., McVicar, T. R., Donohue, R. J., Zhang, Y., Roderick, M. L., Chiew,
F. H. S., Zhang, L., and Zhang, J.: Lags in hydrologic recovery following an
extreme drought, Water Resour. Res., 53, 4821–4837, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y., Feng, D., Yu, L., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Bai, Y., Hernández, H. J., Galleguillos, M., Estades, C., Biging, G. S., Radke, J. D., and Gong, P.:
Detailed dynamic land cover mapping of Chile: Accuracy improvement by
integrating multi-temporal data, Remote Sens. Environ., 183, 170–185,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Progressive water deficits during multiyear droughts  in basins with long hydrological memory in Chile</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A decade-long (2010–2020) period with precipitation deficits in central–south Chile (30–41°&thinsp;S), the so-called megadrought (MD), has led to streamflow depletions of larger amplitude than expected from precipitation anomalies, indicating an intensification in drought propagation. We analysed the catchment characteristics and runoff mechanisms modulating such intensification by using the CAMELS-CL dataset and simulations from the HBV hydrological model. We compared annual precipitation–runoff (P–R) relationships before and during the MD across 106 basins with varying snow-/rainfall regimes and identified those catchments where drought propagation was intensified. Our results show that catchments' hydrological memory – modulated by snow and groundwater – is a key control of drought propagation. Snow-dominated catchments (30–35°&thinsp;S) feature larger groundwater contribution to streamflow than pluvial basins, which we relate to the infiltration of snowmelt over the Western Andean Front. This leads to longer memory in these basins, represented by a significative correlation between autumn streamflow (when snow has already melted) and the precipitation from the preceding year. Hence, under persistent drought conditions, snow-dominated catchments accumulate the effects of precipitation deficits and progressively generate less water, compared with their historical behaviour, notably affecting central Chile, a region with limited water supply and which concentrates most of the country's population and water demands. Finally, we addressed a general question: what is worse – an extreme single-year drought or a persistent moderate drought? In snow-dominated basins, where water provision strongly depends on both the current and previous precipitation seasons, an extreme drought induces larger absolute streamflow deficits; however persistent deficits induce a more intensified propagation of the meteorological drought. Hence, the worst scenario would be an extreme meteorological drought following consecutive years of precipitation below average, as occurred in 2019. In pluvial basins of southern Chile
(35–41°&thinsp;S), hydrologic memory is still an important factor, but water supply is more strongly dependant on the meteorological conditions of the current year, and therefore an extreme drought would have a higher impact on water supply than a persistent but moderate drought.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agboma, C. O. and Lye, L. M.: Hydrologic memory patterns assessment over a
drought-prone Canadian prairies catchment, J. Hydrol. Eng., 20, 1–11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001106</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Garreton, C.: CAMELS-CL explorer, available at: <a href="http://camels.cr2.cl/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Garreton, C., Mendoza, P. A., Boisier, J. P., Addor, N., Galleguillos, M., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Lara, A., Puelma, C., Cortes, G., Garreaud, R., McPhee, J., and Ayala, A.: The CAMELS-CL dataset: catchment attributes and meteorology for large sample studies – Chile dataset, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5817–5846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5817-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Garreton, C., Lara, A., Boisier, J. P., and Galleguillos, M.: The
Impacts of Native Forests and Forest Plantations on Water Supply in Chile,
Forests, 10, 473, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060473" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060473</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P.: Role of Topography in Controlling Throughflow Generation, Earth Surf. Process., 3, 331–344,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290030402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290030402</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Arroyo, M. T. K., Robles, V., Tamburrino, Í., Martínez-Harms, J.,
Garreaud, R. D., Jara-Arancio, P., Pliscoff, P., Copier, A., Arenas, J.,
Keymer, J., and Castro, K.: Extreme Drought A ff ects Visitation and Seed Set
in a Plant Species in the Central Chilean Andes Heavily Dependent on Hummingbird Pollination, Plants, 9, 1–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111553" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111553</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
ASTER GDEM: Earthdata Search, available at: <a href="https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 May 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., and Hrachowitz, M.: A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow, Nat. Clim. Change,
4, 583–586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2246</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bergström, S.: Utvechling och tillämpning av en digital avrinningsmodell, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Blöschl, G. and Montanari, A.: Climate change impacts – throwing the
dice?, Hydrol. Process., 24, 374–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7574" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7574</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Garreaud, R., and Muñoz, F.: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to the Southeast Pacific precipitation decline and recent megadrought in central Chile, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 413–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067265" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067265</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Boisier, J. P., Alvarez-Garretón, C., Cordero, R. R., Damiani, A., Gallardo, L., Garreaud, R. D., Lambert, F., Ramallo, C., Rojas, M., and
Rondanelli, R.: Anthropogenic drying in central-southern Chile evidenced by
long-term observations and climate model simulations, Elem. Sci. Anth., 6,
74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.328</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Bozkurt, D., Rojas, M., Boisier, J. P., and Valdivieso, J.: Projected
hydroclimate changes over Andean basins in central Chile from downscaled CMIP5 models under the low and high emission scenarios, Climatic Change, 150, 131–147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2246-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2246-7</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Carey, S. K., Tetzlaff, D., Seibert, J., Soulsby, C., Buttle, J., Laudon, H., McDonnell, J., McGuire, K., Caissie, D., Shanley, J., Kennedy, M., Devito, K., and Pomeroy, J. W.: Inter-comparison of hydro-climatic regimes across northern catchments: Synchronicity, resistance and resilience, Hydrol. Process., 24, 3591–3602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7880</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Carroll, R. W. H., Deems, J. S., Niswonger, R., Schumer, R., and Williams, K.
H.: The Importance of Interflow to Groundwater Recharge in a Snowmelt-Dominated Headwater Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 5899–5908,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082447</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cortés, G., Vargas, X., and McPhee, J.: Climatic sensitivity of streamflow timing in the extratropical western Andes Cordillera, J. Hydrol.,
405, 93–109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.013</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
DGA: Resolución 1674, Deja sin efecto Resolución D. G. A. No. 39, de febrero de 1984 y establece nuevos criterios para calificar épocas de extraordinaria sequía, 12 de Junio de 2012, Dirección General de Aguas, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Chile, p. 3, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
DGA: Actualización del Balance Hídrico Nacional, SIT No. 417, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Dirección General de Aguas, División de Estudios y Planificación, Realizado por: Universidad de Chile &amp; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Duethmann, D., Blöschl, G., and Parajka, J.: Why does a conceptual hydrological model fail to correctly predict discharge changes in response to climate change?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3493–3511, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Eltahir, E. A. B. and Yeh, P. J. F.: On the asymmetric response of aquifer
water level to floods and droughts in Illinois, Water Resour. Res., 35,
1199–1217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900071</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, K., Peel, M., Western, A., and Zhang, L.: Improved Rainfall-Runoff
Calibration for Drying Climate: Choice of Objective Function, Water Resour.
Res., 54, 3392–3408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, K., Knoben, W., Peel, M., Peterson, T., Ryu, D., Saft, M., Seo, K. W., and Western, A.: Many Commonly Used Rainfall-Runoff Models Lack Long, Slow Dynamics: Implications for Runoff Projections, Water Resour. Res., 56, 1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025286" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025286</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fowler, K. J. A., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., Zhang, L., and Peterson, T. J.: Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an
apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 52, 1820–1846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018068" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018068</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Garreaud, R., Alvarez-Garreton, C., Barichivich, J., Boisier, J. P., Christie, D., Galleguillos, M., LeQuesne, C., McPhee, J., and Zambrano-Bigiarini, M.: The 2010–2015 mega drought in Central Chile: Impacts
on regional hydroclimate and vegetation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21,
6307–6327, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Garreaud, R. D., Boisier, J. P., Rondanelli, R., Montecinos, A., Sepúlveda, H. H., and Veloso-Aguila, D.: The Central Chile Mega Drought (2010–2018): A climate dynamics perspective, Int. J. Climatol., 40, 421–439, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6219</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez, M. E., Gómez-González, S., Lara, A., Garreaud, R., and
Díaz-Hormazábal, I.: The 2010–2015 Megadrought and its influence on the fire regime in central and south-central Chile, Ecosphere, 9, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2300</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of
the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N.: The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the Earth surface, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, 1–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GC004370</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
H2O.ai: h2o: Python Interface for H<sub>2</sub>O, Python package version 3.30.0.6, available at: <a href="https://github.com/h2oai/h2o-3" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 May 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jasechko, S., Birks, S. J., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Fawcett, P. J., Sharp, Z. D., McDonnell, J. J., and Welker, J. M.: The pronounced seasonality of global groundwater recharge, Water Resour. Res., 50, 8845–8867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015809</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Persson, M., Gardelin, M., and Bergström, S.: Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model, J. Hydrol., 201, 272–288, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lloyd, S. P.: Least Squares Quantization in PCM, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 28, 129–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Masotti, I., Aparicio-Rizzo, P., Yevenes, M. A., Garreaud, R., Belmar, L., and Farías, L.: The Influence of River Discharge on Nutrient Export and
Phytoplankton Biomass Off the Central Chile Coast (33°–37°&thinsp;S): Seasonal Cycle and Interannual Variability, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00423</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., and Kleist, J.: Drought monitoring with multiple time scales, in: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Applied
Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, 233–236, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Muñoz, A. A., Klock-Barría, K.; Alvarez-Garreton, C., Aguilera-Betti, I., González-Reyes, Á., Lastra, J. A., Chávez, R. O., Barría, P., Christie, D., Rojas-Badilla, M., and LeQuesne, C.: Water Crisis in Petorca Basin, Chile: The Combined Effects of a Mega-Drought and Water Management, Water, 12, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030648" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030648</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Muñoz-Sabater, J.: First ERA5-Land dataset to be released this spring,
ECMWF Newsl., 159, 8–9, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Muñoz Sabater, J.: ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), available at: <a href="https://www.ecmwf.int/en/era5-land" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2019b
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Orth, R. and Seneviratne, S. I.: Propagation of soil moisture memory to
streamflow and evapotranspiration in Europe, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3895–3911, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3895-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3895-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Peña, E. A. and Slate, E. H.: Global validation of linear model assumptions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 101, 341–354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000637" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000637</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Peters, E., Bier, G., van Lanen, H. A. J., and Torfs, P. J. J. F.: Propagation and spatial distribution of drought in a groundwater catchment, J. Hydrol., 321, 257–275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.08.004</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Pool, S., Vis, M., and Seibert, J.: Evaluating model performance: towards a
non-parametric variant of the Kling–Gupta efficiency, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 63, 1941–1953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, available at: <a href="https://www.R-project.org/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 May 2020), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Robinson, M. and Ward, R.: Hydrology: principles and processes, 2017th Edn.,
IWA, London, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdes, J. B.: The geomorphologic structure of
hydrologic response, Water Resour. Res., 15, 1409–1420, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Saft, M., Western, A. W., Zhang, L., Peel, M. C., and Potter, N. J.: The
influence of multiyear drought on the annual rainfall-runoff relationship: An Australian perspective, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2444–2463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015348" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015348</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Saft, M., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., Perraud, J. M., and Zhang, L.: Bias in
streamflow projections due to climate-induced shifts in catchment response,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1574–1581, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067326" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067326</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Saft, M., Peel, M. C., Western, A. W., and Zhang, L.: Predicting shifts in
rainfall-runoff partitioning during multiyear drought: Roles of dry period and catchment characteristics, Water Resour. Res., 52, 9290–9305,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019525" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019525</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N. W., and Clark, D. B.: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3245–3250, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222460110</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, J.: Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 215–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Seibert, J. and Vis, M. J. P.: Teaching hydrological modeling with a user-friendly catchment-runoff-model software package, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3315–3325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3315-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Staudinger, M., Stoelzle, M., Seeger, S., Seibert, J., Weiler, M., and Stahl,
K.: Catchment water storage variation with elevation, Hydrol. Process., 31, 2000–2015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11158</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Tachikawa, T., Hato, M., Kaku, M., and Iwasaki, A.: Characteristics of ASTER
GDEM version 2, in: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3657–3660, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Taucare, M., Daniele, L., Viguier, B., Vallejos, A., and Arancibia, G.:
Groundwater resources and recharge processes in the Western Andean Front of
Central Chile, Sci. Total Environ., 722, 137824, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137824</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Van De Griend, A. A., De Vries, J. J., and Seyhan, E.: Groundwater discharge
from areas with a variable specific drainage resistance, J. Hydrol., 259, 203–220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00583-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00583-2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Van Lanen, H. A. J., Wanders, N., Tallaksen, L. M., and Van Loon, A. F.:
Hydrological drought across the world: Impact of climate and physical catchment structure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1715–1732,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1715-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Van Loon, A. F.: Hydrological drought explained, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev.
Water, 2, 359–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1085</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Van Loon, A. F. and Laaha, G.: Hydrological drought severity explained by
climate and catchment characteristics, J. Hydrol., 526, 3–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.059</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Van Loon, A. F. and Van Lanen, H. A. J.: A process-based typology of hydrological drought, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1915–1946,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1915-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1915-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Van Loon, A. F., Tijdeman, E., Wanders, N., Van Lanen, H. A. J., Teuling, A.
J., and Uijlenhoet, R.: How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and
deficit, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4640–4656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd020383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jd020383</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Viale, M. and Garreaud, R.: Summer Precipitation Events over the Western Slope of the Subtropical Andes, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1074–1092,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00259.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00259.1</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, Y., McVicar, T. R., Donohue, R. J., Zhang, Y., Roderick, M. L., Chiew,
F. H. S., Zhang, L., and Zhang, J.: Lags in hydrologic recovery following an
extreme drought, Water Resour. Res., 53, 4821–4837, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Y., Feng, D., Yu, L., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Bai, Y., Hernández, H. J., Galleguillos, M., Estades, C., Biging, G. S., Radke, J. D., and Gong, P.:
Detailed dynamic land cover mapping of Chile: Accuracy improvement by
integrating multi-temporal data, Remote Sens. Environ., 183, 170–185,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
